Mirror Neutron Stars Maur´ıcioHippert,1 Jack Setford,2 Hung Tan,1 David Curtin,2 Jacquelyn Noronha-Hostler,1 and Nicol´asYunes1 1Illinois Center for Advanced Studies of the Universe, Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA 2Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A7, Canada (Dated: March 4, 2021) The fundamental nature of dark matter is entirely unknown. A compelling candidate is Twin Higgs mirror matter, invisible hidden-sector cousins of the Standard Model particles and forces. This generically predicts mirror neutron stars, degenerate objects made entirely of mirror nuclear matter. We find their structure using realistic equations of state, robustly modified based on first- principle quantum chromodynamic calculations. We predict their detectability with gravitational waves and binary pulsars, suggesting an impressive discovery potential and ability to probe the dark sector. Dark Matter makes up ∼ 85% of all matter in our particle species and bound states that interact via three universe, yet its composition and properties remain un- fundamental gauge forces plus gravity. Why should dark known. We only have gravitational information on large matter be so simple in comparison? Nothing prevents astrophysical or cosmological scales: how much of it ex- dark matter from being composed of different particle ists, along with modest bounds on self-interactions and species, endowed with their own dark forces. Next-to- more stringent bounds on interactions with Standard minimal examples including few particle species or forces Model (SM) matter [1]. These constraints are important, are being rigorously investigated [5], but dark sectors of but allow for an enormous space of possibilities. Uncover- similar complexity to the SM are underexplored. We refer ing the fundamental particle nature of dark matter would to this enticing possibility as Dark Complexity [6, 7]. solve one of the greatest mysteries of modern science. Given the lack of empirical evidence for theories like It is possible that all of dark matter is a single, ef- WIMPs or SUSY, the plausibility of complex dark mat- fectively collisionless particle species. This possibility is ter, and its potentially wildly different experimental sig- appealing not only due to its simplicity, but also because natures compared to minimal dark matter; it is imper- such dark matter candidates occur in predictive theories ative to understand the physical consequences of Dark of particle physics that extend the SM to address an a pri- Complexity. This seems daunting given the vast space of ori unrelated issue. For example, the Hierarchy Problem, possibilities, but unsolved fundamental puzzles of high- one of the most important puzzles in theoretical physics, energy particle physics can again provide guidance. is the inconsistency between the observed Higgs mass and A well-motivated example of Dark Complexity is mir- the value expected from quantum field theory. In the SM, ror matter [8, 9], a dark matter candidate related to the electroweak scale and the masses of all fundamental SM matter via a discrete symmetry. Part of dark mat- particles are set by the mass of the Higgs boson. How- ter would be made up of mirror protons, neutrons, and ever, the Higgs mass is sensitive to unknown physics at electrons: cousins of the known SM particles that do tiny distance scales, including details of quantum gravity. not interact under SM gauge forces, making them in- Quantum corrections should set the Higgs mass mH near visible. Instead, mirror matter interacts with itself via the Planck Scale ∼ 1018 GeV. This implies that all SM mirror versions of electromagnetism, the weak and strong matter collapses into black holes, and is in direct conflict forces. Just as WIMPs occur in supersymmetry, mirror with the measured value of mH ≈ 125 GeV. matter is a prediction of another solution to the Hierar- Supersymmetry (SUSY) [2] solves this problem by in- chy Problem, the Twin Higgs mechanism [9{11]. Twin troducing new particles that cancel large quantum cor- Higgs theories predict different collider signatures than arXiv:2103.01965v1 [astro-ph.HE] 2 Mar 2021 rections to mH . Minimal SUSY models predict the exis- SUSY [12, 13], evading existing constraints [3] from LHC tence of Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs) searches. Twin Higgs mirror matter is then an excellent that could be dark matter. The simplicity of this sce- starting point to understand Dark Complexity. Several nario implies a relationship between dark matter signa- of its predictions have already been theoretically studied tures, like atomic recoil events in direct detection ex- and will be tested in coming years [6, 7, 10, 11]. periments and the observed dark matter relic abundance We examine for the first time one of the simplest but from freeze-out. Unfortunately, the predicted direct de- most spectacular predictions: if mirror matter is part tection signals of WIMPs and collider signals of SUSY of dark matter, then the cosmos should be filled with have not yet been found [3, 4], straining this hypothesis. mirror neutron stars, invisible degenerate stellar objects The WIMP paradigm is theoretically attractive, but made entirely of mirror nucleons, analogous to SM neu- paints a picture of dark matter in stark contrast to our tron stars. These objects are a generic prediction of non- experience with SM matter. SM matter contains various minimal dark matter theories endowed with a confining 2 force similar to SM quantum chromodynamics (QCD), SM and mirror matter. While the details of these dy- but have never been studied before in realistic detail.1 namics depend on the precise parameters of mirror mat- Twin Higgs Mirror Matter { The Mirror Twin ter and remain uncertain, the endpoint of mirror-stellar- Higgs mechanism [9, 10] addresses the Hierarchy Problem evolution is, as for SM matter, relatively simple: compact by introducing a new hidden sector-copy of the SM parti- objects like neutron stars, white dwarfs, or black holes. cles and forces (see Supplementary Material Section A). Mirror neutron stars are a generic prediction of Dark As in the SM, mirror quarks form mirror proton and neu- Complexity and we investigate their properties and sig- tron bound states, coalesce into mirror nuclei, and form natures by studying the Twin Higgs benchmark model. mirror atoms with mirror electrons [11]. The symmetry At low energies, the mirror QCD sector behaves simi- relating the SM and mirror sector means that the baryo- larly to the SM QCD sector, except that renormalization genesis mechanism that generates the matter-excess of group arguments [11] imply the strong confinement scale 0 our universe should have a mirror-sector analogue, mean- ΛQCD is larger than the SM (where ΛQCD ≈ 250 MeV) 0 ing a significant fraction of DM could be in the form of by a factor of ΛQCD=ΛQCD ≈ 1:3 (1:7) for f=v = 3 (10). mirror matter. Mirror matter and SM matter have to The mirror neutron and proton masses increase accord- interact very faintly via the Higgs boson, and other fee- ingly. The pion mass is given by the fundamental quark p ble interactions could exist, but for the purposes of our masses and confinement scale, mπ / ΛQCDmq, mak- SM astrophysical discussion we can regard mirror matter as ing the mirror pion 2 (4) times heavier than mπ = 140 invisible and only detectable gravitationally. MeV for f=v = 3 (10). This allows us to predict the Earlier studies of mirror matter focused on an exact properties of mirror neutron stars. copy of SM matter (e.g. [8]). An interesting possibility, Our work focuses on this symmetric Twin Higgs bench- but not one motivated by the hierarchy problem, and mark model, but the results depend mainly on the dark many astrophysical predictions can be derived by exact confinement scale. Our analysis therefore provides in- analogy to known phenomena. In contrast, the mini- sight into other mirror-QCD scenarios with different mir- mal Mirror Twin Higgs predicts mirror matter that is a ror hadron spectra [20] as well, including scenarios with 0 SM copy, except that the vacuum expectation value f lighter mirror quark masses and hence lower ΛQCD. of the mirror Higgs is scaled up compared to the value Mirror Neutron Star Equation of State { Let for the SM Higgs v by a factor of f=v ∼ 3 − 10. The us begin by outlining a reasonable model for the equa- mirror quarks, mirror leptons, and mirror W and Z bo- tion of state (EoS) of SM neutron stars, which we can son masses are scaled up by the same factor. The lower then rescale to construct a mirror neutron star EoS. Neu- bound f=v & 3 ensures agreement with existing experi- tron stars probe different degrees of freedom depending mental constraints, including LHC Higgs coupling mea- on their radius, or equivalently their baryon density nB. surements [18]. Large values of f reduce the theory's The uncertainty increases at the core of a neutron star, ability to solve the Hierarchy Problem, making f 10 a sat sat 14 3 . where nB & 2nB , with nB ≈ 3 × 10 g=cm being reasonable upper bound. The properties of Twin Higgs the nucleon saturation density [21]. Starting from their mirror matter significantly deviate from the SM, while crust and ending at their core, their degrees of freedom being similar enough to allow for robust predictions. are thought to be: atoms, then nuclei (with increasing Just like SM matter, mirror matter would display rich mass), nuclei and free nucleons (after the neutron drip dynamics in our universe at all size scales. In the early sat line), nucleonic pasta, interacting nucleons (above nB ), universe, the presence of mirror matter gives rise to cos- then possibly hyperons, and possibly quarks (though we mological signatures like mirror-baryo-acoustic oscilla- do not consider these hypothetical phases here).