Projects in Portland, Oregon Unless Noted Koch Landscape Architecture
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Report on the Amended and Restated Interstate Corridor Urban Renewal Plan 2021
Exhibit B Page 1 of 30 REPORT ON THE AMENDED AND RESTATED INTERSTATE CORRIDOR URBAN RENEWAL PLAN 2021 Prepared by Elaine Howard Consulting, LLC in conjunction with the Prosper Portland and the Portland Office of Management and Finance Exhibit B Page 2 of 30 Exhibit B Page 3 of 30 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 4 II. A DESCRIPTION OF PHYSICAL, SOCIAL, AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS IN URBAN RENEWAL AREA ............................................................................................................................... 5 A. Physical Conditions .......................................................................................................................... 6 B. Social, Economic, and Housing Conditions ................................................................................. 14 III. EXPECTED IMPACT, INCLUDING FISCAL IMPACT OF THE PLAN IN LIGHT OF ADDED SERVICES OR INCREASED POPULATION .................................................................................. 18 IV. REASONS FOR SELECTION OF EACH URBAN RENEWAL AREA IN THE PLAN .................. 19 V. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EACH PROJECT ACTIVITY TO BE UNDERTAKEN UNDER THE PLAN AND THE EXISTING CONDITIONS .................................................................................. 19 A. Rehabilitation, Development, and Redevelopment Assistance .............................................. 19 B. Housing ........................................................................................................................................... -
Portland Parks and Recreation
Portland Parks and Recreation CBO has posted the online, interactive version of the bureau’s performance dashboard here: http://www.portlandoregon.gov/cbo/article/523266 The following questions were asked during the bureau’s budget work session. Responses are included in the attached packet. 1. Please provide a breakdown of scholarships by community center. 2. What facilities and parks would be closed if there were no increase in major maintenance funding? 3. Did the increase in the value of scholarships granted correspond to the number or participants in the program? Was there an increase in workload or did the cost of the programs go up? 4. List/plans of the following: Five-year major maintenance queue Five-year SDC funded projects Prior five-year SDC fund projects 5. Please provide descriptions and budget amounts for the two new requests: (1) parks rangers expansion and (2) tree code implementation PP&R Council Budget Questions – Follow up from March 17th Budget presentation: 1) Breakdown of scholarships by community center See Attached Scholarship PDF File 2) What facilities and parks would be closed if there were no increase in major maintenance funding? Rather than close whole facilities or parks when there is inadequate major maintenance funding we reduce levels of service (thin the soup) across the system and we also delay repairs and replacements, thus allowing the risk of failure to increase. Examples are the sewer back up at Sellwood, the sewer failure at Buckman Field House, the emergency culvert failures, etc. The one counter example that resulted a full closure and demolition was the wood play structure at Couch Park. -
District Background
DRAFT SOUTHEAST LIAISON DISTRICT PROFILE DRAFT Introduction In 2004 the Bureau of Planning launched the District Liaison Program which assigns a City Planner to each of Portland’s designated liaison districts. Each planner acts as the Bureau’s primary contact between community residents, nonprofit groups and other government agencies on planning and development matters within their assigned district. As part of this program, District Profiles were compiled to provide a survey of the existing conditions, issues and neighborhood/community plans within each of the liaison districts. The Profiles will form a base of information for communities to make informed decisions about future development. This report is also intended to serve as a tool for planners and decision-makers to monitor the implementation of existing plans and facilitate future planning. The Profiles will also contribute to the ongoing dialogue and exchange of information between the Bureau of Planning, the community, and other City Bureaus regarding district planning issues and priorities. PLEASE NOTE: The content of this document remains a work-in-progress of the Bureau of Planning’s District Liaison Program. Feedback is appreciated. Area Description Boundaries The Southeast District lies just east of downtown covering roughly 17,600 acres. The District is bordered by the Willamette River to the west, the Banfield Freeway (I-84) to the north, SE 82nd and I- 205 to the east, and Clackamas County to the south. Bureau of Planning - 08/03/05 Southeast District Page 1 Profile Demographic Data Population Southeast Portland experienced modest population growth (3.1%) compared to the City as a whole (8.7%). -
The Fields Neighborhood Park Community Questionnaire Results March-April 2007
The Fields Neighborhood Park Community Questionnaire Results March-April 2007 A Community Questionnaire was included in the initial project newsletter, which was mailed to over 4,000 addresses in the vicinity of the park site (virtually the entire neighborhood) as well as other interested parties. The newsletter was made available for pick-up at Chapman School and Friendly House and made available electronically as well. A total of 148 questionnaires were submitted, either by mail or on the web, by the April 20 deadline. The following summarizes the results. 1. The original framework plan for the River District Parks suggested three common elements that would link the parks together. Which do you feel should be included in The Fields neighborhood park? 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Boardwalk Pedestrian Gallery Aquifer 2. This park is envisioned as a “neighborhood park no answ er – over two square blocks providing more traditional spaces for neighborhood residents. Do you agree ? with this overall concept? no yes Comments Regarding Question #2 “Traditional Neighborhood Park” #1 - None (of the original “framework concepts” are important What to you mean by "traditional" As long as this park does not become filthy (ie. bad terrain, homeless) like the waterfront, I'm for it. Excellent idea. A traditional park will be a nice complement to the other two parks. I don't know if my selections were recorded above. A continuation of the boardwalk is essential to making the connection between and among the parks. The design of the buildings around the park has narrowed the feeling of openness so it is beginning to look like a private park for the residential buildings surrounding it. -
Make a Plan to VOTE! Two Ways to Return Your Ballot: 1
Make a Plan to VOTE! Two ways to return your ballot: 1. Vote early & return your ballot by mail. Get it in the mail by Tue., Oct. 27. No stamp needed! 2. Return to any Official Ballot Drop Site in Oregon by 8 PM Nov 3, 2020. Multnomah County Voters’ Pamphlet November 3, 2020 General Election Dear Multnomah County Voter: This Voters’ Pamphlet for the Nov. 3, 2020 General Election is being mailed to all residential households in Multnomah County. Due to the size of both the State and County Voters’ Pamphlet the pamphlets are being mailed separately. If you don’t have your State Voters’ Pamphlet yet, look for it in the mail soon. In advance of the election we are asking voters to Make a Plan to VOTE! Here is what you can do to be ready for the election and ensure your vote is counted: 1. Register to VOTE. Update your voter registration information or register to vote at oregonvotes.gov/myvote. The Voter Registration Deadline is Oct. 13. Sign up to Track Your Ballot at multco.us/trackyourballot. 2. Get your ballot. You will receive your ballot in the mail beginning Oct. 14. If you have not received your ballot by Oct. 22, take action and contact the elections office. 3. VOTE your ballot. Remember to sign your ballot return envelope. Your signature is your identification. If you forget to sign or your signature does not match we will contact you so you can take action and we can count your vote. 4. Return your ballot. -
Oregon's Recent Past
Oregon’s Recent Past: North Willamette Valley, Portland, Columbia River, Mt. Hood. Written by RW. Faulkner Recent Photos by RW. Faulkner & MS. Faulkner ©= RW Faulkner 5/17/2018 All Rights Reserved First Printing August 2018 ISBN: 978-0-9983622-6-7 About the Cover Above Left Front Cover Above Right Back Cover Top Photo: Mt. Hood by FH Shogren, perhaps taken Top Photo: Clive E. Long, a Portland printer, near NW Thurman Street, Portland OR. Photo was & perhaps Clayton Van Riper of Dayton Ohio, featured in the 1905 Lewis & Clark Souvenir rest while climbing Mt. Hood, August 16, 1907. Program, (LC), titled, “Snow-Capped Mt. Hood, Seen Map: Copy of map of the northern Willamette Across The Exposition City,” & described by Rinaldo Valley. Original traced/drawn on tissue paper. M. Hall as, “Not every day may Mt. Hood be seen at It was used by pioneer Dr. Marcus Hudson its best, for clouds ever hover ‘round it, but the White to navigate, soon after his arrival in1891. constant watcher is frequently rewarded by seeing it (Found in a small notebook with most entries stand forth clearly & glisten in the sunlight as a dating 1892-1895, but map could be from mountain of silver. ...50 miles east of Portland by air 1891-1897.) line & 93 by shortest route, this favorite proudly rears its head 11,225 feet heavenward, thousands of feet above every neighboring object. It is one of the most notable peaks in the West, serving as a guide post to Lewis & Clark on their memorable trip of exploration to the coast in 1805-06, & later to the pioneers who hastened on to Western Oregon....” Lower Photo Mt. -
City of Portland Situation Status Report
City of Portland Situation Status Report INCIDENT NAME: COVID-19 REPORT #07 (04.02.20 0001) Citywide Readiness Status Full Activation ECC GENERAL PHONE 503-823-2323 OERS # 2020-0528 PREPARED BY KATHRYN HARTINGER, SITUATION UNIT LEAD REPORTING PERIOD 3/31/20 1700 – 4/2/20 1700 What’s new? Look for bold text. Next situation status report out Tuesday afternoon, April 7. Have something to add/update? Bureaus and agencies should send inputs by 10 AM TUESDAY, April 7 to [email protected] with subject line: COVID Situation Update – [Bureau Name]. Reminder that this report will be publicly available online. A. SITUATION SUMMARY COVID-19 Cases Oregon, Multnomah County Multnomah County, by Race & Ethnicity (Source: OHA) (Source: Multnomah County Data Dashboard) 800 100 700 80 600 60 40 Oregon 500 400 20 4 7 81 0 1 13 16 300 0 MultCo 200 100 0 Feb 28 Mar 06 Mar 13 Mar 20 Mar 27 Source: Oregon Health Authority OVERVIEW • Case information is dynamic – current Oregon information is available at the Oregon Health Authority (OHA) website. • Current statistics for United States are on the CDC website. • On March 30, the Oregon Department of Education issued Distance Learning for All Guidance, acknowledging that “there is a very real potential that our students…may not return to school this academic year. This called for a shift from providing Situation Status Report Rev: 4/2/2020 1 supplementary education to Distance Learning for All by April 13. • In a March 31 press release, it was announced that the State of Oregon was expecting a shipment of personal protective equipment (PPE) from FEMA that day. -
Downloads.Gigl.Org.Uk/Website/Parks People and Nature1.Pdf 8 Flores, T
AN ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION OF Michelle Lee Talal for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Environmental Science presented on May 7, 2019 Title: Exploring Urban Parks: Plant Communities, Visitor Experiences, and Manager Perspectives in Portland, Oregon Abstract approved: ______________________________________________________ Mary V. Santelmann Urban parks are biodiversity hotspots within cities and have the potential to provide a range of socio-cultural benefits for people, but may not always meet the needs and desires of park visitors. A variety of land use practices and environmental factors affect urban park biodiversity and vegetation structure, composition, and ecological function, but more studies are needed to compare plant taxonomic composition, biodiversity patterns, and species traits across different types of urban green spaces. Additionally, there is a lack of research that explores park user experiences, vegetation perceptions, and accessibility issues in a range of urban park types interspersed throughout Portland using qualitative methods to observe and interview visitors on-site. More research is also needed that focuses on interviewing park managers about their perspectives on park benefits and management. The findings of my interdisciplinary dissertation may assist managers in their aims to achieve various ecological goals, as well as meet the needs and desires of park visitors within increasingly developed urban areas. The purpose of this research is three-fold, and includes examining: 1) The relationships between plant community composition, biodiversity patterns, environmental variables, and species traits in a range of urban parks in Portland, Oregon; 2) how the vegetation in these urban parks currently meets the needs and desires of visitors; and 3) how park managers currently manage vegetation in the parks to meet the needs and desires of visitors. -
PP Annual Report Exec Summary V4.Indd
2015–16 Dear Portlanders: Thank you for your recent commitment to repairing and improving Portland’s parks. In November 2014, you and an impressive 74 percent of Portlanders voted “Yes” for the Parks Replacement Bond Projects26 underway — the highest percentage ever for a Parks ballot measure. You became part of a long tradition of Portlanders who’ve built and maintained our city’s enviable collection of park facilities. In this fi rst full year of the Bond, from July 2015 to July 2016, we’ve laid the foundation for the work to be done. In this upcoming year, you’ll start to see tangible results in the parks. Replacement of the 70 to 90 year old mechanical systems at Grant Pool was the fi rst completed project, and next year, results will be visible across the city. Project1 completed About every nine years over the last century, Portlanders have invested in increasing, preserving and maintaining our park system by voting “yes” on parks bonds or levies. Before the 2014 bond, the last major bond was in 1994, meaning 20 years passed without signifi cant park improvements or address- ing dire repair needs. Portland Parks & Recreation anticipates a $248 million funding gap for major maintenance needs over the next 10 years. The $68 million in funds from the 2014 Parks Replacement Bond will not address all of these maintenance issues, but it is vital to fi xing, upgrading and replacing the most crucial of these needs. Projects18 ahead of As your Parks Commissioner and Parks Director, we are making sure the funds will be used wisely and schedule maximize benefi ts to the greatest number of park users. -
March 2021/ Volume 34, No
NW “Digging deep, p. 3 p. 9 p. 15 Café Nell gets Shining a light” Zero-sum Pearl riot stirs fallacy city help help call INSIDE INSIDE MARCH 2021/ VOLUME 34, NO. 7 FREE SERVING PORTLAND’S NORTHWEST NEIGHBORHOODS SINCE 1986 nwexaminer Compassion and Order Stephanie Hansen and Debbie Poitra serve coffee to unhoused residents in Downtown Portland. Photo by Wesley Mahan Homeless people receive $1 a bag to pack up trash, a program of the Neighborhood associations blend Goose Hollow Foothills League underwritten by donations of recy- clables to BottleDrop. A total of 36 supposedly incompatible themes bags were collected one day in late February. Photo by Matt Erceg BY ALLAN CLASSEN Wilhelms lived across the street Another friend, Margaret Jessie, who knew the departed. ouis Wilhelms was not the from the First Unitarian Church in said he was “a good person who The fact that Wilhelms at last got kind of man who ordinarily a tent. He had been homeless for 25 would let people into his tent to get his due owes to the organized com- merits a newspaper obituary. of the last 30 years and got around out of the rain.” passion of Downtown Neighbor- L in a wheelchair after his legs were His date of death was unknown. With those sketchy generalities, hood Association volunteers who No survivors have been identified. amputated due to diabetes. Wilhelms’ death was commemorat- launched the Good Neighbor Pro- His closest associates didn’t know His homeless neighbor, Charles ed Jan. 13 in a singular service gram last year. Teams of residents his date of birth. -
2021 Reciprocal Admissions Program
AMERICAN HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY 2021 RECIPROCAL ADMISSIONS PROGRAM Participating Gardens, Arboreta, and Conservatories For details on benefits and 90-mile radius enforcement, see https://ahsgardening.org/gardening-programs/rap Program Guidelines: A current membership card from the American Horticultural Society (AHS) or a participating RAP garden entitles the visitor to special admissions privileges and/or discounts at many different types of gardens. The AHS provides the following guidelines to its members and the members of participating gardens for enjoying their RAP benefits: This printable document is a listing of all sites that participate in the American Horticultural Society’s Reciprocal Admissions Program. This listing does not include information about the benefit(s) that each site offers. For details on benefits and enforcement of the 90- mile radius exclusion, see https://ahsgardening.org/gardening-programs/rap Call the garden you would like to visit ahead of time. Some gardens have exclusions for special events, for visitors who live within 90 miles of the garden, etc. Each garden has its own unique admissions policy, RAP benefits, and hours of operations. Calling ahead ensures that you get the most up to date information. Present your current membership card to receive the RAP benefit(s) for that garden. Each card will only admit the individual(s) whose name is listed on the card. In the case of a family, couple, or household membership card that does not list names, the garden must extend the benefit(s) to at least two of the members. Beyond this, gardens will refer to their own policies regarding household/family memberships. -
Ri-Ze D______----::D-A-Te- -=S~~E~J/Ddny Qeh:Nh ~~~·!-\ Printed Name of Authorlz Lty Offrclal Title 3 70 8 5
Notice of City Measure Election SEL 802 ,.., 1111. o!lls 160-on. m o.u. 1~ H&. 2StUt5.15ot Ot5. 1S4 465 City and Notice Information Notlee Is hereby given on August 7th , 20 ~. that a measure election will be held In City of Portland oregon on November 4th · , 20~. - - - - - Name of City or Cities Date of Election The following shall be the ballot title of the measure io be submitted to the city's voters: Caption 10 words I 1 Please see attached. ! ! I Question 20 words Please see attached. Summary 175 words :ti I rn ("") I Please see attached. rn rn< -•• 0 I I I The following authorizad city official haraby certifies the above ballot title Is true and complete, which Includes publication of notice and the completion of the ballot title challenge process. Signature redacted 0 Signature of Au tho~ ~fflcial no-t-re.... ~- u-i re-d-to--:-b-e_n_o_ta-:ri-ze_d__ _ ___----::D-a-te- -=s~~e~J/ddNy Qeh:nh ~~~·!-\ Printed Name of Authorlz lty Offrclal Title 3 70 8 5 EXHIIUTC CAPTION Bonds to fix playgrounds, trails; improve park facilities, safety, accessibility. QUESTION Shall Portland fix, improve park facilities by issuing bonds estimated to maintain cmrent tax rate; require audits and public oversight? If the bonds are approved, they will be payable from taxes on property or properly ownership that are not subject to the limits of sections II and II b, Article XI of the Oregon Constitution. SUMMARY Measure would authorize $68,000,000 in general obligation bonds for Portland Parks & Recreation facilities.