DOCSLIB.ORG

Report Number 11-42 Intergovern

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report Number 11-42 Intergovern DATE: May 25, 2011 TO: Board of Commissioners FROM: Patrick Quinton, Executive Director SUBJECT: Report Number 11-42 Intergovernmental Agreement with Portland Parks & Recreation for Construction of The Fields Neighborhood Park (NW Overton Street between NW 10th and NW 11th Avenues) in the River District Urban Renewal Area; providing funding in an amount not to exceed $5,140,000. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BOARD ACTION REQUESTED Adopt Resolution No. 6880 ACTION SUMMARY This action will authorize the Executive Director to execute an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) between the Portland Development Commission (PDC) and Portland Parks & Recreation (PP&R) for the construction of The Fields Neighborhood Park (the Park). The planned 3.3 acre park is located in the Pearl District, north of NW Overton Street between NW 10th and NW 11th Avenues. This IGA will provide up to $5,140,000 to PP&R to construct the Park. The IGA budget for fiscal years 2011-12 and 2012-13 is as follows: FY 11-12 FY 12-13 Total Park Improvements - Base $1,300,000 $2,035,000 $3,335,000 Park Improvements – Package 1 $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Environmental Remediation $99,000 $231,000 $330,000 Right of Way Improvements $0 $504,000 $504,000 Park Construction Subtotal $1,399,000 $3,770,000 $5,169,000 Construction Management $83,000 $288,000 $371,000 Total $1,482,000 $4,058,000 $5,540,000 This action will bring the total expected PDC investment in the Park to $14.2 million, and the total cost of the Park to $19.5 million including the value of the 1.2 acres donated by Hoyt Street Properties (HSP) and $400,000 in PP&R funding towards the total $5.54 million construction cost. Construction of the Park fulfills a City of Portland (City) commitment dating to 1997 to construct three parks as part of the successful public/private partnership between the City and Hoyt Street Properties (HSP) to convert a warehousing district and railyard into a high- density, transit-oriented neighborhood. The Park has been designed by a team led by the Office of Cheryl Barton (OCB) to meet the needs of the neighborhood, including a large, unprogrammed grassy area, a children’s play area, and an off-leash dog area. Construction of the Park is anticipated to begin in early 2012 and conclude by the fall of 2012. Board Report No. 11-42 ─ The Fields Intergovernmental Agreement May 25, 2011 Page 2 of 10 PUBLIC BENEFIT Development of the property as a three-acre public park will provide much needed active recreational space in the high-density, transit-oriented Pearl District neighborhood. The Park is designed to be a relatively large neighborhood park with a flat, unprogrammed grassy area that will serve to complement the two other nearby parks, the small and active Jamison Square and the small, passive Tanner Springs Park. The large, flexible open space of the Park is intended to contrast with the surrounding urban development and provide a variety of recreational opportunities throughout the year. Together, these three parks will provide a full range of recreational opportunities and enhance the livability of the neighborhood for residents, employees, and visitors. In addition, the Park will further implement the planned desire to extend the North Park Blocks into the Pearl District and connect the neighborhood to the Willamette River. Key features of the base Park include: Large, unprogrammed lawn; 5,000 square foot fenced off-leash dog area; Walking paths; Environmental remediation; and Right-of-way improvements to NW 11th Street and NW Overton Avenue. Key features of the of the Park enhancement package included in the Proposed Action include: Children’s play area; 8,000 square foot fenced off-leash dog area; Restroom (Portland Loo); Enhanced materials – to alleviate heavy use and foot traffic; and Boardwalk. Key features to be included as “add alternates” pending favorable contractor bids include: Urbanology Trail – a walkway along the northeast edge of the park where visitors will encounter public art or interpretive elements that celebrate dramatic views and contextual urban elements such as trains, the Willamette River, and Centennial Mills; will also increase safety and security by providing more activity in this area of the park and allow police and maintenance staff vehicular access; Dry Fountain – can be retrofitted to recirculating water feature in the future; Second restroom (Portland Loo); Enhanced materials – to alleviate anticipated heavy use and foot traffic; Additional furnishings (increased number of benches and tables); and Rain/Shade Shelter in off-leash dog area. A restroom building was included in the Park design through design development. This building has been excluded from the final Park design in favor of one Portland Loo in the base Park and a second Portland Loo as an add alternate for cost reasons. This change saves approximately $80,000 - $160,000 in project costs. PP&R may pursue separately funding and constructing the restroom building in the future. Although a water feature was originally identified as a desirable feature by the Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC) in accordance with the Peter Walker Framework Plan, a water feature has not been included in the final design. PP&R has found recirculating fountains to Board Report No. 11-42 ─ The Fields Intergovernmental Agreement May 25, 2011 Page 3 of 10 be high in ongoing maintenance and operational costs, and a fountain that does not recirculate water was determined by PP&R and PDC staff to be wasteful of scarce potable water supplies. The design will accommodate a recirculating water feature if funds become available in the future. The River Overlook, a ramp and Willamette River overlook leading to the future bridge connecting the Park to Centennial Mills has been excluded from the Park for cost reasons. In January 2009, the Park was identified as one of three PP&R capital projects in the “Portland Job Creation and Business Stimulus Package” and is anticipated to directly create 72 jobs based on an economic multiplier on the $5.2 million estimated construction budget. PDC’s $14.2 million total contribution towards the Park will leverage the $400,000 funding contribution by PP&R and the donation of Blocks 22 and 25 by Hoyt Street Properties (HSP) to PP&R that will increase the size of the Park from 2.1 to 3.3 acres. This was agreed to by the City and HSP in principle at the time the Hoyt Street Properties Master Plan was prepared in 2006. HSP entered into an agreement in 2010 with PDC and PP&R to donate the parcels to the City. The parcels were appraised at $5.25 million. According to the agreement, in exchange for the property donation, HSP is potentially eligible to receive up to $650,000 in Systems Development Charge (SDC) credits against SDC charges assessed at the time HSP seeks to develop properties in the future. The SDC credit reduce the net value of the donation to approximately $4.6 million. This represents approximately 24 percent of the total $19.5 million total cost of the Park: Sources Uses PDC PP&R HSP Total Property Acquisition $7,667,000 $0 $0 $7,667,000 Property Donation (1) $400,000 $250,000 $4,600,000 $5,250,000 Design/Environmental Assessment $941,000 $0 $0 $941,000 Construction IGA $5,140,000 $400,000 $0 $5,540,000 Regional Arts and Culture Council $93,000 $0 $0 $93,000 Total $14,241,000 $650,000 $4,600,000 $19,491,000 Percentages 73% 3% 24% 100% (1) Per the terms of the Donation Agreement, in return for the donation of Blocks 22 and 25 by HSP, PP&R and PDC agreed that HSP may be eligible for System Development Charge (SDC) credits not to exceed $650,000, and that PDC would reimburse the SDC fund for any credits granted in excess of $250,000 but not exceeding $650,000 (for a maximum PDC reimbursement of $400,000) subject to a future HSP application and PP&R approval. This action will support the following PDC goals: Sustainability and Social Equity Healthy Neighborhoods A Vibrant Central City Strong Economic Growth and Competitive Region Effective Stewardship over our Resources and Operations, and Employee Investment Board Report No. 11-42 ─ The Fields Intergovernmental Agreement May 25, 2011 Page 4 of 10 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND FEEDBACK Planning for the design and construction of the Park has involved a Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC) and numerous public involvement opportunities, including presentations, open houses, workshops, and questionnaires. This process has been managed by PP&R in coordination with PDC. Feedback from this committee has helped shape the Park design and programming especially for priority elements including the off-leash dog area and children’s play area. The CAC is supportive of the current design and approach, including increasing the Park Construction budget by $1 million to include the Park enhancements. The CAC has expressed concern with the project schedule and has asked PP&R to closely evaluate the project schedule and expedite the permitting process to begin construction in 2011. In addition, the CAC indicated a preference for PP&R to stop further work on the design and permitting of the restroom building in favor of allocating funds to achieve the Urbanology Trail. The CAC has also expressed concern that the final Park design does not include a water feature, as water features symbolizing Tanner Creek was a unifying theme of the sequence of three parks as envisioned in the Peter Walker Framework Study. (See Attachment “C”). A vocal minority of dog advocates believe the off-leash dog area in the final design is not large enough.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • WORKING DOCDRAFT Charter Directors Handbook .Docx
    PPS Resource Guide A guide for new arrivals to Portland and the Pacific Northwest PPS Resource Guide PPS Resource Guide Portland Public Schools recognizes the diversity and worth of all individuals and groups and their roles in society. It is the policy of the Portland Public Schools Board of Education that there will be no discrimination or harassment of individuals or groups on the grounds of age, color, creed, disability, marital status, national origin, race, religion, sex or sexual orientation in any educational programs, activities or employment. 3 PPS Resource Guide Table of Contents How to Use this Guide ....................................................................................................................6 About Portland Public Schools (letter from HR) ...............................................................................7 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................8 Cities, Counties and School Districts .............................................................................................. 10 Multnomah County .............................................................................................................................. 10 Washington County ............................................................................................................................. 10 Clackamas County ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Town Square Park Master Plan Public Hearing Draft
    TOWN SQUARE PARK MASTER PLAN PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT MAY 2019 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Municipality of Anchorage Parks and Recreation Department and the planning team would like to recognize and thank all the individuals and organizations who have worked to create the Town Square Park Master Plan. A special thanks to the members of the Citizen and Technical Advisory Groups for their dedication, insight and assistance. MUNICIPALITY OF CITIZEN ADVISORY ANCHORAGE GROUP MEMBERS PHOTO CREDITS Ethan Berkowitz, Mayor Radhika Krishna Bettisworth North, Erik Jones: cover, contents, 1, 7, 9, 21, 22, 23, 25-26, 28, 30, 33, 37, 42, Chris Schutte, Director of Economic and Shannon Kuhn Community Development 49, 55, 57, 59, 60, 65, 77-78, 78, 85, 87 Dianne Holmes John Rodda, Director of Parks & Recreation Tayna Iden P&R Horticulture Department: 59, 83 Josh Durand, Parks Superintendent Nancy Harbour James Starzec MOA Parks and Recreation, Steve Rafuse: 3, Nina Bonito Romine 4, 7, 8, 11, 13, 14, 17-18, 23 24, 27, 28, 30, PLANNING TEAM Jennifer Richcreek 32, 33, 35, 41, 45, 53, 58, 60, 61-62, 65-66, John Blaine 66, 68, 69, 75, 77, 83, 89, 95, 100 MOA PARKS & RECREATION Darrel Hess Steve Rafuse, Project Manager R&M Consultants, Van Le: 34 BETTISWORTH NORTH TECHNICAL ADVISORS Anchorage Downtown Partnership: 5-6, 17, Mark Kimerer, Landscape Architect 43-44, 57, 79-80, 81-82 Erik Jones, Landscape Designer GROUP MEMBERS R&M CONSULTANTS Jamie Boring Van Le, Planner Elise Huggins Taryn Oleson, Planner Erin Baca Katie Chan, Graphic Designer Sandy Potvin Sharon Chamard
    [Show full text]
  • The Fields Neighborhood Park Community Questionnaire Results March-April 2007
    The Fields Neighborhood Park Community Questionnaire Results March-April 2007 A Community Questionnaire was included in the initial project newsletter, which was mailed to over 4,000 addresses in the vicinity of the park site (virtually the entire neighborhood) as well as other interested parties. The newsletter was made available for pick-up at Chapman School and Friendly House and made available electronically as well. A total of 148 questionnaires were submitted, either by mail or on the web, by the April 20 deadline. The following summarizes the results. 1. The original framework plan for the River District Parks suggested three common elements that would link the parks together. Which do you feel should be included in The Fields neighborhood park? 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Boardwalk Pedestrian Gallery Aquifer 2. This park is envisioned as a “neighborhood park no answ er – over two square blocks providing more traditional spaces for neighborhood residents. Do you agree ? with this overall concept? no yes Comments Regarding Question #2 “Traditional Neighborhood Park” #1 - None (of the original “framework concepts” are important What to you mean by "traditional" As long as this park does not become filthy (ie. bad terrain, homeless) like the waterfront, I'm for it. Excellent idea. A traditional park will be a nice complement to the other two parks. I don't know if my selections were recorded above. A continuation of the boardwalk is essential to making the connection between and among the parks. The design of the buildings around the park has narrowed the feeling of openness so it is beginning to look like a private park for the residential buildings surrounding it.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Portland Situation Status Report
    City of Portland Situation Status Report INCIDENT NAME: COVID-19 REPORT #07 (04.02.20 0001) Citywide Readiness Status Full Activation ECC GENERAL PHONE 503-823-2323 OERS # 2020-0528 PREPARED BY KATHRYN HARTINGER, SITUATION UNIT LEAD REPORTING PERIOD 3/31/20 1700 – 4/2/20 1700 What’s new? Look for bold text. Next situation status report out Tuesday afternoon, April 7. Have something to add/update? Bureaus and agencies should send inputs by 10 AM TUESDAY, April 7 to [email protected] with subject line: COVID Situation Update – [Bureau Name]. Reminder that this report will be publicly available online. A. SITUATION SUMMARY COVID-19 Cases Oregon, Multnomah County Multnomah County, by Race & Ethnicity (Source: OHA) (Source: Multnomah County Data Dashboard) 800 100 700 80 600 60 40 Oregon 500 400 20 4 7 81 0 1 13 16 300 0 MultCo 200 100 0 Feb 28 Mar 06 Mar 13 Mar 20 Mar 27 Source: Oregon Health Authority OVERVIEW • Case information is dynamic – current Oregon information is available at the Oregon Health Authority (OHA) website. • Current statistics for United States are on the CDC website. • On March 30, the Oregon Department of Education issued Distance Learning for All Guidance, acknowledging that “there is a very real potential that our students…may not return to school this academic year. This called for a shift from providing Situation Status Report Rev: 4/2/2020 1 supplementary education to Distance Learning for All by April 13. • In a March 31 press release, it was announced that the State of Oregon was expecting a shipment of personal protective equipment (PPE) from FEMA that day.
    [Show full text]
  • PP Annual Report Exec Summary V4.Indd
    2015–16 Dear Portlanders: Thank you for your recent commitment to repairing and improving Portland’s parks. In November 2014, you and an impressive 74 percent of Portlanders voted “Yes” for the Parks Replacement Bond Projects26 underway — the highest percentage ever for a Parks ballot measure. You became part of a long tradition of Portlanders who’ve built and maintained our city’s enviable collection of park facilities. In this fi rst full year of the Bond, from July 2015 to July 2016, we’ve laid the foundation for the work to be done. In this upcoming year, you’ll start to see tangible results in the parks. Replacement of the 70 to 90 year old mechanical systems at Grant Pool was the fi rst completed project, and next year, results will be visible across the city. Project1 completed About every nine years over the last century, Portlanders have invested in increasing, preserving and maintaining our park system by voting “yes” on parks bonds or levies. Before the 2014 bond, the last major bond was in 1994, meaning 20 years passed without signifi cant park improvements or address- ing dire repair needs. Portland Parks & Recreation anticipates a $248 million funding gap for major maintenance needs over the next 10 years. The $68 million in funds from the 2014 Parks Replacement Bond will not address all of these maintenance issues, but it is vital to fi xing, upgrading and replacing the most crucial of these needs. Projects18 ahead of As your Parks Commissioner and Parks Director, we are making sure the funds will be used wisely and schedule maximize benefi ts to the greatest number of park users.
    [Show full text]
  • March 2021/ Volume 34, No
    NW “Digging deep, p. 3 p. 9 p. 15 Café Nell gets Shining a light” Zero-sum Pearl riot stirs fallacy city help help call INSIDE INSIDE MARCH 2021/ VOLUME 34, NO. 7 FREE SERVING PORTLAND’S NORTHWEST NEIGHBORHOODS SINCE 1986 nwexaminer Compassion and Order Stephanie Hansen and Debbie Poitra serve coffee to unhoused residents in Downtown Portland. Photo by Wesley Mahan Homeless people receive $1 a bag to pack up trash, a program of the Neighborhood associations blend Goose Hollow Foothills League underwritten by donations of recy- clables to BottleDrop. A total of 36 supposedly incompatible themes bags were collected one day in late February. Photo by Matt Erceg BY ALLAN CLASSEN Wilhelms lived across the street Another friend, Margaret Jessie, who knew the departed. ouis Wilhelms was not the from the First Unitarian Church in said he was “a good person who The fact that Wilhelms at last got kind of man who ordinarily a tent. He had been homeless for 25 would let people into his tent to get his due owes to the organized com- merits a newspaper obituary. of the last 30 years and got around out of the rain.” passion of Downtown Neighbor- L in a wheelchair after his legs were His date of death was unknown. With those sketchy generalities, hood Association volunteers who No survivors have been identified. amputated due to diabetes. Wilhelms’ death was commemorat- launched the Good Neighbor Pro- His closest associates didn’t know His homeless neighbor, Charles ed Jan. 13 in a singular service gram last year. Teams of residents his date of birth.
    [Show full text]
  • Happy Valley Beaverton Vancouver Damascus Camas
    C O V IN G PLAIN T BLVD O N R TH D UR HA ST 63RD ST FO D EHA R MINN HWY 500 58TH ST E D E V D V R A R E A E D 54TH ST V V N Y R H D E A R A L T L E R I E V 7 O D L N A H D A 3 R S S L 49 nd T TH ST E Isla C N K T O Y 49TH ST 1 H 2 E 2 L A N N S I I R 1 6 N V T H E 1 L 1 E 5 E I I O T 45 R TH ST 1 N I G J ST G 44TH D O U L T N L R E S A F ST 39TH ST L39oTHw Impact Development Practices R S D S R- 500 D A 50 HWY LV U 1 B in the city of Portland V I E 33RD ST IN E I A 28TH ST S L D P 28TH ST V L D R A H U A T V R D U H S N FOURTH PLAIN B L FO LVD T D R B Y 8 T 3 P A gton R Vancouver 3 Burlin 0 S D O 1 W O D D R L 18TH ST V N N E N A A I V TH ST Y A 18 E A U O A R O W S R D M C G M E E B E N N M A E A R V 2 R V C V V D E 3 A N I M A N A N A T I L 2 H E L N V F A LI H PLAIN BLV 9TH ST A H D L a D A M I D y E M H G V T 8TH ST N R d T E A D E e 7 2 E n RGREEN B 2 N 9 L C 7 I V 1 s D 2 1 l A 1 a R 9 Camas R B n T H 1 O d UR C LV B 1ST ST K D LV C D MIL R D L D PLA L E IN B A R R LVD K E E K R R D 7TH S R E T R D D H D R S T S R E I Y O L R W M R S CGI L L E WAS LIV L B HING L R O T A 20TH ST W ON E Y M D B E R LVD E B N V E T 21A1 V C D E A R S O N 9R O G L A R R E E D U G E R M L ON N T B E H IA R K 5 H T S O - W I 4 Y R T P 6 B L A V H 1 34TH ST D T P R 210 O 9 N KAISER Portland 18TH AVE R 209 HWY D l S LO 208 Internationa 14 9 R N MB 9 206 20H7 A O RD 9 D MCINTOSH RD J9 T E W Airport S G205 I ID LL R 9 AM B E D T T D NTOWN R E A A R ERM S E IR G T 3 9 P 3 O B 204 9 R G D LV9 LOMBARD ST T ove R rn D ment Islan F Y d o 5 W CO LU H S r MBI S e A A P s ROSA PARKS WAY B W t LVD A 202 Y D 9 R S U K S MA t Union Y 201 RIN Wes P Portland E S L 9 E LL I 3 5 U SP VI a I RING N 0 KILLINGSWORTH ST 199 197 0 r 196 191495 2 L E 200 D 9 9 I- D k 198 9 R E K V 9 9 E 9 193 D N A 9 192 L W V ES I 9 V R T S 191 B 99 A L 190 189 O E B9 R 9 C U ST .
    [Show full text]
  • Ri-Ze D______----::D-A-Te- -=S~~E~J/Ddny Qeh:Nh ~~~·!-\ Printed Name of Authorlz Lty Offrclal Title 3 70 8 5
    Notice of City Measure Election SEL 802 ,.., 1111. o!lls 160-on. m o.u. 1~ H&. 2StUt5.15ot Ot5. 1S4 465 City and Notice Information Notlee Is hereby given on August 7th , 20 ~. that a measure election will be held In City of Portland oregon on November 4th · , 20~. - - - - - Name of City or Cities Date of Election The following shall be the ballot title of the measure io be submitted to the city's voters: Caption 10 words I 1 Please see attached. ! ! I Question 20 words Please see attached. Summary 175 words :ti I rn ("") I Please see attached. rn rn< -•• 0 I I I The following authorizad city official haraby certifies the above ballot title Is true and complete, which Includes publication of notice and the completion of the ballot title challenge process. Signature redacted 0 Signature of Au tho~ ~fflcial no-t-re.... ~- u-i re-d-to--:-b-e_n_o_ta-:ri-ze_d__ _ ___----::D-a-te- -=s~~e~J/ddNy Qeh:nh ~~~·!-\ Printed Name of Authorlz lty Offrclal Title 3 70 8 5 EXHIIUTC CAPTION Bonds to fix playgrounds, trails; improve park facilities, safety, accessibility. QUESTION Shall Portland fix, improve park facilities by issuing bonds estimated to maintain cmrent tax rate; require audits and public oversight? If the bonds are approved, they will be payable from taxes on property or properly ownership that are not subject to the limits of sections II and II b, Article XI of the Oregon Constitution. SUMMARY Measure would authorize $68,000,000 in general obligation bonds for Portland Parks & Recreation facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Median Income, City Officials Said
    The Oregonian Portland parks will spend $8 million to extend North Park Blocks as part of Broadway Corridor redevelopment By Everton Bailey Jr. February 1, 2020 Portland’s parks department says it plans to use up to $8 million in fees paid by developers to turn a city-owned downtown parking lot into new public green space. The move to redevelop the lot near the Pacific Northwest College of Art along Northwest Glisan Street would extend the North Park Blocks one square block toward the city’s vacant central post office site, which is also slated for redevelopment. The money would come from system development charges and it would cover planning, design and construction costs, said Mark Ross, a parks and recreation spokesperson. “We are optimistic that some funds may remain after the North Park Blocks project,” Ross said. Any remaining money, he said, would likely be put toward a new park planned to be built on the post office site. The developments are part of the city’s Broadway Corridor redevelopment project, a plan to create a new neighborhood encompassing 34 acres in Northwest Portland between the Chinatown-Japantown historic district and the Pearl District featuring the 14-acre post office site as its anchor. The area also covers Union Station and the former Greyhound bus terminal. The project is expected to include at least 720 affordable housing units, small business opportunities, new parks, public art and a new cycle track for biking. Affordable housing units are planned to be made available for families earning less than 60% of area median income, city officials said.
    [Show full text]
  • RFP NUMBER 00000617 City of Portland, Oregon REQUEST FOR
    RFP NUMBER 00000617 City of Portland, Oregon May 4, 2017 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR PORTLAND OPEN SPACE SEQUENCE RESTORATION PROJECT CONSTRUCTION MANAGER / GENERAL CONTRACTOR SERVICES PROPOSALS DUE: May 31, 2017 by 4:00 p.m. Response Envelope(s) shall be sealed and marked with RFP Number and Project Title. SUBMITTAL INFORMATION: Refer to PART II, SECTION B. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION Submit the Proposal to: Procurement Services City of Portland 1120 SW Fifth Avenue, Room 750 Portland, OR 97204 Attn: Celeste King Refer questions to: Celeste King City of Portland, Procurement Services Phone: (503) 823-4044 Fax : (503) 865-3455 Email: [email protected] A MANDATORY PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING has been scheduled for Thurs, May 18, 2017, at 1:30 pm starting at Ira Keller Fountain at SW Third & Clay Streets, Portland, OR 97204. TABLE OF CONTENTS . Notice to Proposers . General Instructions and Conditions of the RFP . Project Contacts . Part I: Solicitation Requirements Section A General Information Section B CM/GC Services Section C Exhibits Section D Proposal Forms . Part II: Proposal Preparation and Submittal Section A Pre-Proposal Meeting / Clarification Section B Proposal Submission Section C Proposal Content and Evaluation Criteria . Part III: Proposal Evaluation Section A Proposal Review and Selection Section B Contract Award . Exhibits Exhibit A CM/GC Disadvantaged, Minority, Women and Emerging Small Business Subcontractor and Supplier Plan Exhibit B Workforce Training and Hiring Program Exhibit C General Conditions of the Contract for CM/GC Projects Exhibit D Sample Pre-Construction Services Contract Exhibit E Sample Construction Contract Exhibit F Assignment of Anti Trust Rights Exhibit G CM/GC & Owner Team Roles and Responsibilities Table Exhibit H Design Team Contract Exhibit I Public Information Plan Exhibit J Project Validation Report for Lovejoy Fountain Rehabilitation Exhibit K Anticipated Project Schedule Exhibit L 30% Cost Estimate Exhibit M 30% Specification Table of Contents Exhibit N 30% Construction Drawings .
    [Show full text]
  • South Park Blocks Urban Renewal Plan, As Amended September 11, 1991 (Second Amendment)
    Portland State University PDXScholar Portland City Archives Oregon Sustainable Community Digital Library 9-11-1991 South Park Blocks Urban Renewal Plan, as Amended September 11, 1991 (Second Amendment) Portland (Or.). Development Commission Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/oscdl_cityarchives Part of the Urban Studies Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Portland (Or.). Development Commission, "South Park Blocks Urban Renewal Plan, as Amended September 11, 1991 (Second Amendment)" (1991). Portland City Archives. 36. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/oscdl_cityarchives/36 This Report is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Portland City Archives by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. CITY OF PORTLAND, OREGON SOUTH PARK BLOCKS URBAN RENEWAL PLAN AS AMENDED SEPTEMBER 11, 1991 (SECOND AMENDMENT) CITY OF PORTLAND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION 1120 SW FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 1100 PORTLAND, OREGON 97204-1968 URBAN RENEWAL PLAN FOR THE SOUTH PARK BLOCKS URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT ADOPTED July 24, 1985 BY CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 157635 FIRST AMENDMENT ADOPTED May 22, 1991 BY CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 164216 SECOND AMENDMENT ADOPTED September 11, 1991 BY PORTLAND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 4141 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. SECTION 100 - Introduction 1 SECTION 200 - Definitions 2 SECTION 300 -
    [Show full text]
  • Centennial Mills Framework Plan
    Centennial Mills Framework Plan: EXISTING CONDITIONS April 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1. INTRODUCTION Project Description 1 Project History 1 Purpose of this Report 1 SECTION 2. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENTS Urban Design Context 2 Historic Significance / Merit 3 Parks / Greenway 3 Permitting / Review 4 Stormwater / Tanner Creek 4 Transportation 5 Condition of Structures 6 Mounted Patrol Unit Facilities 6 SECTION 3. FULL TEXT OF ASSESSMENTS Historic Significance / Merit, Bureau of Planning, Historic Resources Program 8 Stormwater / Tanner Creek, Bureau of Environmental Services 21 Permitting / Review, Bureau of Development Services 25 Transportation, Portland Office of Transportation 29 Condition of Structures, KPFF Consulting Engineers 50 Parks / Greenway, Portland Parks and Recreation 59 Mounted Patrol Unit Facilities, SERA Architects 62 Urban Design Context, Bureau of Planning, Urban Design Group 65 SECTION 1. INTRODUCTION PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Portland Development Commission (PDC) and the Bureau of Planning are working with stakeholders to create a framework plan for the Centennial Mills site, which will summarize public’s goals for the site. The framework plan will serve as the foundation for a potential future request for design and development proposals for the site. PROJECT HISTORY PDC acquired the 4.75-acre Centennial Mills site, located on the west bank of the Willamette River between the Fremont and Broadway Bridges, in 2000. To date, more than $12 million of tax increment and other funding has been spent for acquisition and improvements of the site and its buildings. The property was originally acquired for more riverfront open space as called for by the Central City Plan of 1988. Subsequent amendments to Central City policy, the adopted River District Urban Renewal Plan, and more recent open space and development master plans continued to emphasize similar objectives of developing more public open space on the river, and facilitating connectivity between the River District and greenway.
    [Show full text]