DOCSLIB.ORG

Lecturenotes 4-Revised

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lecturenotes 4-Revised Chapter 4 Spin-Orbit Coupling 4.1 Addition of Angular Momenta 4.1.1 Alternate set of angular momentum operators We consider two independent systems that each carries angular momenta (each could be either orbital angular momentum or spin). Before the two systems are coupled, each system is described by the angular momentum operators Jˆ1 and Jˆ2 and their eigenstates j1,m1 and j ,m satisfying the conditions | i | 2 2i ˆ2 2 Ji ji,mi = ~ ji(ji +1)ji,mi , ˆ | i | i Jiz ji,mi = ~mi ji,mi , (4.1) ˆ | i | i Ji ji,mi = ~ ji(ji +1) mi(mi 1) ji,mi 1 , ±| i − ± | ± i for i =1, 2. When we consider thep combination of these two systems, the basis of the combined system is created by j ,j ; m ,m = j ,m j ,m , (4.2) | 1 2 1 2i | 1 1i⌦| 2 2i where indicates the tensor product of two states that describe the two independent systems. ⌦ When the total angular momentum of the two systems is considered, it is described by the sum of the two angular momentum operators Jˆ = Jˆ1 + Jˆ2.Becausethetwosystemsare independent, the operators Jˆ1 and Jˆ2 commute with each other, and the components of each system satisfies the commutation relations of the angular momentum operator. It is easy to verify that the components of the total angular momentum operator Jˆ also satisfies the commutation relationship ˆ ˆ ˆ [Ji, Jj]=i~"ijkJk. (4.3) We now look for four independent operators that commute with each other that includes 2 the operators Jˆ and Jˆz,toprovideanalternativedescriptionofthecombinedsystemas compared to the four commuting operators Jˆ2, Jˆ , Jˆ2, Jˆ . { 1 1z 2 2z} 31 32 CHAPTER 4. SPIN-ORBIT COUPLING ˆ ˆ ˆ2 ˆ2 ˆ Since J1 and J2 each commute with J1 and J2 ,sodoesJ.Morespecifically,wenotethat ˆ2 ˆ ˆ2 ˆ2 J and Jz both commute with the operators J1 and J2 ; [Jˆ2, Jˆ2]=[Jˆ2, Jˆ2]=0, 1 2 (4.4) ˆ ˆ2 ˆ ˆ2 [Jz, J1 ]=[Jz, J2 ]=0. The operators Jˆ1z and Jˆ2z commute with the operator Jˆz = Jˆ1z + Jˆ2z. However, since ˆ2 ˆ2 ˆ2 ˆ ˆ ˆ2 ˆ2 ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ J = J1 + J2 +2J1 J2 = J1 + J2 +2J1zJ2z + J1+J2 + J1 J2+, (4.5) · − − ˆ ˆ ˆ2 ˆ2 ˆ2 ˆ2 ˆ the operators J1z and J2z do not commute with J .So,thefouroperators J1 , J2 , J , Jz commute with each other, and forms a natural basis with which to describe the{ total angular} momentum of the combined system. 4.1.2 Addition rule for the angular momentum states Classically, angular momentum is a vector, so when two angular momenta L~ 1 and L~ 2 are added together, the magnitude of the resulting angular momentum can be between L~ L~ | 1 − 2| when the two vectors are aligned in opposite directions, and L~ 1 + L~ 2 when the two vectors are aligned in the same direction. Quantum mechanically, the| “magnitude”| of the angular momentum operator Jˆ is roughly represented by its eigenvalue j,sowhenthetwoangular momentum operators Jˆ1 with eigenvalue j1 and Jˆ2 with eigenvalue j2 are added (without loss of generality, we assume j j ), one can speculate that the resulting operator Jˆ will 1 ≥ 2 have its eigenvalue j between the values j1 j2 and j1 +j2.Itturnsoutthatthisspeculation is exactly true, and the addition rule for angular− momentum can be stated as follows: When two systems each with angular momentum of eigenvalues j and j are added, • 1 2 the angular momentum eigenvalue of the added system runs from j1 j2 to j1 + j2 in increments of 1, and | − | For each resulting j value, mj runs from j to j in increments of 1, i.e., mj = • j, j +1,...,j 1,j. − − − − Although a formal proof is quite complicated, we provide some examples in the next section to illustrate the results. We note that the total number of states in the two systems is (2j1 +1)(2j2 +1),sincethedegeneracy(totalnumberofmj states) are 2j1 +1forthefirst system and 2j2 +1forthesecondsystem,respectively.Inthedescriptionofthecombined system, the total number of mj states is 2j +1 foreach j value, so the total number of states is given by j1+j2 j1+j2 j1 j2 1 N = (2i +1)= (2i) − − (2i)+(j + j ) (j j )+1 i=j1 j2 i=0 0 1 2 1 2 − − − − =(j + j +1)(j + j ) (j j )(j j 1) + 2j +1 (4.6) P1 2 1 2P 1 2 P1 2 2 =(j + j )2 (j j )2−+2j −+2j +1=(2− − j +1)(2j +1), 1 2 − 1 − 2 1 2 1 2 matching the total number of states in the description of individual systems. 4.1. ADDITION OF ANGULAR MOMENTA 33 4.1.3 Addition of two spins In this section, we consider addition of angular momentum for two spin 1/2particles.In ˆ2 ˆ ˆ2 ˆ the uncoupled representation, the four quantum numbers are S1 , S1z, S2 , S2z , and the four possible states are { } 1 1 1 1 ⇠ = , , , . (4.7) | i |2 2 ±2 ±2i These corresponds to the four basis spin states , , , . {| ""i |"#i |#"i |##i} In the coupled representation, the states are simultaneous eigenstates of the four operators Sˆ2, Sˆ , Sˆ2, Sˆ2 ,where { z 1 2 } Sˆ2 =(Sˆ + Sˆ )2 = Sˆ2 + Sˆ2 +2Sˆ Sˆ , 1 2 1 2 1 · 2 (4.8) Sˆz = Sˆ1z + Sˆ2z. First, we note that the values of s,eigenvalueoftheSˆ2 operator, greater than 1 are not possible. This is because that would require ms (eigenvalue of the operator Sˆz)ofvalue larger than 1, but m = m + m and both m and m can only take values of 1/2. s 1s 2s 1s 2s ± Next, we note that s =1ispossible,sincems =1ispossible.Sincems =1canonlyhappen when m1s = m2s =+1/2, this state is not degenerate. From this argument, we note that s =1,m =1 = . | s i |""i Applying the total spin lowering operator Sˆ = Sˆ1 + Sˆ2 yields, using Eq. 4.1, − − − ˆ S s =1,ms =1 = ~p2 s =1,ms =0 −| i | i ˆ ˆ 1 3 1 1 =(S1z + S2z) = ~ + ( + )= + . |""i 2 2 2 2 |"#i |#"i |"#i |#"i q (4.9) So, we conclude that s =1,m =0 =( + )/p2. | s i |"#i |#"i Applying the total spin lowering operator once again on this state gives ˆ S s =1,ms =0 = ~p2 s =1,ms = 1 −| i | − i = 1 (Sˆ + Sˆ )( + ) p2 1z 2z |"#i |#"i (4.10) = ~ 1 3 + 1 1 ( + )=~p2 , p2 2 2 2 2 |##i |##i |##i q and therefore s =1,ms = 1 = ,asexpected.Thesethreestatesformthespin triplet states| − i |##i s =1,m =1 = | s i |""i s =1,ms =0 =( + )/p2 (4.11) |s =1,m = i1 = |"#i |#"i | s − i |##i The next possible s value is s =0,accompaniedbyms =0astheonlypossiblems value. This fourth state is formed by a linear superposition of the four basis spin states , , , ,andisorthogonaltoallthreetripletstatesinEq.4.11.Weseethatthisfourth{| ""i |"# statei |#"i cannot|##i} contain nor states, and therefore has to be a linear superposition of only and |""i.Inorderforsuchasuperpositionstatetobeorthogonaltothe|##i s =1,m|"#i=0 state,|#"i we derive the final state, known as the singlet state,as | s i s =0,m =0 =( )/p2. (4.12) | s i |"#i − |#"i 34 CHAPTER 4. SPIN-ORBIT COUPLING 4.1.4 Clebsch-Gordan coefficients The basis state j, m of the coupled system can be expressed in a linear superposition of the | ji uncoupled basis states j1,j2; m1,m2 , as by definition, basis states span the entire Hilbert space for the quantum| system. By notingi that the identity operator is given by the sum of the outer product of all basis states j1 j2 Iˆ = j ,j ; m ,m j ,j ; m ,m , (4.13) | 1 2 1 2ih 1 2 1 2| m1= j1 m2= j2 X− X− we can express the basis states of the coupled system as j1 j2 j, m = j ,j ; m ,m j ,j ; m ,m j, m . (4.14) | ji | 1 2 1 2ih 1 2 1 2| ji m1= j1 m2= j2 X− X− Inner product of two quantum states is a complex number, and the complex numbers j ,j ; m ,m j, m are called Clebsch-Gordan coefficients. h 1 2 1 2| ji 4.2 Spin-Orbit Coupling 4.2.1 Orbiting spins and the term notation For the case of a hydrogen atom, an electron with spin 1/2orbitsaroundthenucleus(proton), itself with spin 1/2. For now, we ignore the nuclear spin, and focus on the interaction between the electron spin and its orbit around the nucleus. This leads to fine structures in the atomic spectrum. The interaction between the resulting energy levels with the nuclear spin is called the hyperfine interaction: this interaction is typically several orders of magnitude smaller, and we will consider that in later chapters. The total angular momentum Jˆ under these conditions arise from two sources of angular momenta, the spin Sˆ and the orbital angular momentum Lˆ: Jˆ = Lˆ + Sˆ.TheoperatorsLˆ and Sˆ commute, as they are completely independent degrees of freedom. The eigenstates we 2 2 2 consider are simultaneous eigenstates of the operators Jˆ , Jˆz, Lˆ , Sˆ ,whichallcommute with each other. The eigenvalue equations are given by{ } ˆ2 2 J j, mj,l,s = ~ j(j +1)j, mj,l,s | i | i Jˆ j, m ,l,s = m j, m ,l,s z j ~ j j (4.15) ˆ2| i 2 | i L j, mj,l,s = ~ l(l +1)j, mj,l,s ˆ2| i 2 | i S j, mj,l,s = ~ s(s +1)j, mj,l,s , | i | i where j runs from l s to l + s,andforeachj, m runs from j to j.Wenotethat | − | j − ˆ ˆ 1 ˆ2 ˆ2 ˆ2 L S j, mj,l,s = 2 (J L S ) j, mj,l,s · | i 2 − − | i (4.16) = ~ [j(j +1) l(l +1) s(s +1)] j, m ,l,s .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Review Sheet on Determining Term Symbols
    Review Sheet on Determining Term Symbols Term symbols for electronic configurations are useful not only to the spectroscopist but also to the inorganic chemist interested in understanding electronic and magnetic properties of molecules. We will concentrate on the method of Douglas and McDaniel (p. 26ff); however, you may find other treatments equal or superior to the D & M method. Term symbols are a shorthand method used to describe the energy, angular momentum, and spin multiplicity of an atom in any particular state. The general form is a given as Tj where T is a capital letter corresponding to the value of L (the angular momentum quantum number) and may be assigned as S, P, D, F, G, … for |L| = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, … respectively. The superscript “a” is called the spin multiplicity and can be evaluated as a = 2S +1 where S is the spin quantum number. The subscript “j” is the numerical value of J, a new quantum number defined as: J = l +S, which corresponds to the total orbital and spin angular momentum of the system. The term symbol 3P is read as triplet – Pee state and indicates that there are two unpaired electrons in a state with maximum orbital angular momentum, L=1. The number of microstates (N) of a system corresponds to the total number of distinct arrangements for “e” number of electrons to be placed in “n” number of possible orbital positions. N = # of microstates = n!/(e!(n-e)!) For a set of p orbitals n = 6 since there are 2 positions in each orbital.
    [Show full text]
  • States of Oxygen Liquid and Singlet Oxygen Photodynamic Therapy
    Oxygen States of Oxygen As far as allotropes go, oxygen as an element is fairly uninteresting, with ozone (O3, closed-shell and C2v symmetric like SO2) and O2 being the stable molecular forms. Most of our attention today will be devoted to the O2 molecule that is so critically connected with life on Earth. 2 2 2 4 2 O2 has the following valence electron configuration: (1σg) (1σu) (2σg) (1πu) (1πg) . It is be- cause of the presence of only two electrons in the two π* orbitals labelled 1πg that oxygen is paramagnetic with a triplet (the spin multiplicity \triplet" is given by 2S+1; here S, the total spin quantum number, is 0.5 + 0.5 = 1). There are six possible ways to arrange the two electrons in the two degenerate π* orbitals. These different ways of arranging the electrons in the open shell are called \microstates". Further, because there are six microstates, we can say that the total degeneracy of the electronic states 2 3 − arising from (1πg) configuration must be equal to six. The ground state of O2 is labeled Σg , the left superscript 3 indicating that this is a triplet state. It is singly degenerate orbitally and triply degenerate in terms of spin multiplicity; the total degeneracy (three for the ground state) is given by the spin times the orbital degeneracy. 1 The first excited state of O2 is labeled ∆g, and this has a spin degeneracy of one and an orbital degeneracy of two for a total degeneracy of two. This state corresponds to spin pairing of the electrons in the same π* orbital.
    [Show full text]
  • Photochemical and Magnetic Properties of Complex and Nuclear Chemistry
    • Programme: MSc in Chemistry • Course Code: MSCHE2001C04 • Course Title: Photochemical and magnetic properties of complex and nuclear chemistry • Unit: Electronic spectra of coordination compounds • Course Coordinator: Dr. Jagannath Roy, Associate Professor, Department of Chemistry, Central University of South Bihar Note: These materials are only for classroom teaching purpose at Central University of South Bihar. All the data/figures/materials are taken from text books, e-books, research articles, wikipedia and other online resources. 1 Course Objectives: 1. To make students understand structure and propeties of inorganic compounds 2. To accuaint the students with the electronic spectroscopy of coordination compounds 3. To introduce the concepts of magnetochemistry among the students for analysing the properties of complexes. 4. To equip the students with necessary skills in photochemical reaction transition metal complexes 5. To develop knowledge among the students on nuclear and radio chemistry Learning Outcomes: After completion of the course, learners will be able to: 1. Analyze the optical/electronic spectra of coordination compounds 2. Make use of the photochemical behaviour of complexes in designing solar cells and other applications. 3. Design and perform photochemical reactions of transition metal complexes 4. Analyze the magnetic properties of complexes 5. Explain the various phenomena taking place in the nucleus 6. Understand the working of nuclear reactors 2 Lecture-1 Lecture Topic- Introduction to the Electronic Spectra of Transition Metal complexes 3 Crystal field theory (CFT) is ideal for d1 (d9) systems but tends to fail for the more common multi- electron systems. This is because of electron-electron repulsions in addition to the crystal field effects on the repulsion of the metal electrons by the ligand electrons.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chemistry of Carbene-Stabilized
    THE CHEMISTRY OF CARBENE-STABILIZED MAIN GROUP DIATOMIC ALLOTROPES by MARIHAM ABRAHAM (Under the Direction of Gregory H. Robinson) ABSTRACT The syntheses and molecular structures of carbene-stabilized arsenic derivatives of 1 1 i 1 1 AsCl3 (L :AsCl3 (1); L : = :C{N(2,6- Pr2C6H3)CH}2), and As2 (L :As–As:L (2)), are presented herein. The potassium graphite reduction of 1 afforded the carbene-stabilized diarsenic complex, 2. Notably, compound 2 is the first Lewis base stabilized diatomic molecule of the Group 13–15 elements, in the formal oxidation state of zero, in the fourth period or lower of the Periodic Table. Compound 2 contains one As–As σ-bond and two lone pairs of electrons on each arsenic atom. In an effort to study the chemistry of the electron-rich compound 2, it was combined with an electron-deficient Lewis acid, GaCl3. The addition of two equivalents of GaCl3 to 2 resulted in one-electron oxidation of 2 to 1 1 •+ – •+ – give [L :As As:L ] [GaCl4] (6 [GaCl4] ). Conversely, the addition of four equivalents of GaCl3 to 2 resulted in two- electron oxidation of 2 to give 1 1 2+ – 2+ – •+ [L :As=As:L ] [GaCl4 ]2 (6 [GaCl4 ]2). Strikingly, 6 represents the first arsenic radical to be structurally characterized in the solid state. The research project also explored the reactivity of carbene-stabilized disilicon, (L1:Si=Si:L1 (7)), with borane. The reaction of 7 with BH3·THF afforded two unique compounds: one containing a parent silylene (:SiH2) unit (8), and another containing a three-membered silylene ring (9).
    [Show full text]
  • Photochemical Generation of Carbenes and Ketenes from Phenanthrene-Based Precursors Part I: Dimethylalkylidene Part II: Diphenylketene
    Colby College Digital Commons @ Colby Honors Theses Student Research 2017 Photochemical Generation of Carbenes and Ketenes from Phenanthrene-based Precursors Part I: Dimethylalkylidene Part II: Diphenylketene Tarini S. Hardikar Student Tarini Hardikar Colby College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.colby.edu/honorstheses Part of the Organic Chemistry Commons Colby College theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed or downloaded from this site for the purposes of research and scholarship. Reproduction or distribution for commercial purposes is prohibited without written permission of the author. Recommended Citation Hardikar, Tarini S. and Hardikar, Tarini, "Photochemical Generation of Carbenes and Ketenes from Phenanthrene-based Precursors Part I: Dimethylalkylidene Part II: Diphenylketene" (2017). Honors Theses. Paper 948. https://digitalcommons.colby.edu/honorstheses/948 This Honors Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at Digital Commons @ Colby. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Colby. Photochemical Generation of Carbenes and Ketenes from Phenanthrene-based Precursors Part I: Dimethylalkylidene Part II: Diphenylketene TARINI HARDIKAR A Thesis Presented to the Department of Chemistry, Colby College, Waterville, ME In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Graduation With Honors in Chemistry SUBMITTED MAY 2017 Photochemical Generation of Carbenes and Ketenes from Phenanthrene-based Precursors Part I: Dimethylalkylidene Part II: Diphenylketene TARINI HARDIKAR Approved: (Mentor: Dasan M. Thamattoor, Professor of Chemistry) (Reader: Rebecca R. Conry, Associate Professor of Chemistry) “NOW WE KNOW” - Dasan M. Thamattoor Vitae Tarini Shekhar Hardikar was born in Vadodara, Gujarat, India in 1996. She graduated from the S.N.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Shift (Δ)
    Chapter 9 ● Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Ch. 9 - 1 1. Introduction Classic methods for organic structure determination ● Boiling point ● Refractive index ● Solubility tests ● Functional group tests ● Derivative preparation ● Sodium fusion (to identify N, Cl, Br, I & S) ● Mixture melting point ● Combustion analysis ● Degradation Ch. 9 - 2 Classic methods for organic structure determination ● Require large quantities of sample and are time consuming Ch. 9 - 3 Spectroscopic methods for organic structure determination a) Mass Spectroscopy (MS) ● Molecular Mass & characteristic fragmentation pattern b) Infrared Spectroscopy (IR) ● Characteristic functional groups c) Ultraviolet Spectroscopy (UV) ● Characteristic chromophore d) Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Ch. 9 - 4 Spectroscopic methods for organic structure determination ● Combination of these spectroscopic techniques provides a rapid, accurate and powerful tool for Identification and Structure Elucidation of organic compounds ● Rapid ● Effective in mg and microgram quantities Ch. 9 - 5 General steps for structure elucidation 1. Elemental analysis ● Empirical formula ● e.g. C2H4O 2. Mass spectroscopy ● Molecular weight ● Molecular formula ● e.g. C4H8O2, C6H12O3 … etc. ● Characteristic fragmentation pattern for certain functional groups Ch. 9 - 6 General steps for structure elucidation 3. From molecular formula ● Double bond equivalent (DBE) 4. Infrared spectroscopy (IR) ● Identify some specific functional groups ● e.g. C=O, C–O, O–H, COOH, NH2 … etc. Ch. 9 - 7 General steps for structure elucidation 5. UV ● Sometimes useful especially for conjugated systems ● e.g. dienes, aromatics, enones 6. 1H, 13C NMR and other advanced NMR techniques ● Full structure determination Ch. 9 - 8 Electromagnetic spectrum cosmic X-rays ultraviolet visible infrared micro- radio- & γ-rays wave wave λ: 0.1nm 200nm 400nm 800nm 50µm IR X-Ray UV NMR Crystallography 1Å = 10-10m 1nm = 10-9m 1µm = 10-6m Ch.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1906.08544V1 [Cond-Mat.Mes-Hall]
    Exchange rules for diradical π-conjugated hydrocarbons R. Ortiz1,2,4, R. A. Boto3, N. Garc´ıa-Mart´ınez1,2, J. C. Sancho-Garc´ıa4, M. Melle-Franco3, J. Fern´andez-Rossier1∗ (1) QuantaLab, International Iberian Nanotechnology Laboratory (INL), Av. Mestre Jos´eVeiga, 4715-330 Braga, Portugal (2)Departamento de F´ısica Aplicada, Universidad de Alicante, 03690, Sant Vicent del Raspeig, Spain (3) CICECO, Departamento de Qu´ımica, Universidade de Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal and (4)Departamento de Qu´ımica F´ısica, Universidad de Alicante, 03690, Sant Vicent del Raspeig, Spain (Dated: June 21, 2019) A variety of planar π-conjugated hydrocarbons such as heptauthrene, Clar’s goblet and, recently synthesized, triangulene have two electrons occupying two degenerate molecular orbitals. The re- sulting spin of the interacting ground state is often correctly anticipated as S = 1, extending the application of Hund’s rules to these systems, but this is not correct in some instances. Here we provide a set of rules to correctly predict the existence of zero mode states, as well as the spin multiplicity of both the ground state and the low-lying excited states, together with their open- or closed-shell nature. This is accomplished using a combination of analytical arguments and configu- ration interaction calculations with a Hubbard model, both backed by quantum chemistry methods with a larger Gaussian basis set. Our results go beyond the well established Lieb’s theorem and Ovchinnikov’s rule, as we address the multiplicity and the open-/closed-shell nature of both ground and excited states. PACS numbers: I.
    [Show full text]
  • Nitrogen Versus Phosphorus
    The Free Atom Atomic energy levels, valence orbital ionization energies (VOIE) Electronegativity for carbon: 2.5 Electronegativity for hydrogen: 2.2 Inorganic Chemistry 5.03 The Free Atom Atomic energy levels, valence orbital ionization energies (VOIE) Electronegativity for carbon: 2.5 Electronegativity for hydrogen: 2.2 Inorganic Chemistry 5.03 The Free Atom Atomic energy levels, valence orbital ionization energies (VOIE) Electronegativity for carbon: 2.5 Electronegativity for hydrogen: 2.2 Inorganic Chemistry 5.03 The Free Atom Atomic energy levels, valence orbital ionization energies (VOIE) Quartet ground state, spin multiplicity given by 3 2S + 1 = 2( 2 ) + 1 = 4 3 1 1 3 Four possible values for the spin: + 2 , + 2 , − 2 , − 2 Inorganic Chemistry 5.03 The Free Atom Atomic energy levels, valence orbital ionization energies (VOIE) Quartet ground state, spin multiplicity given by 3 2S + 1 = 2( 2 ) + 1 = 4 3 1 1 3 Four possible values for the spin: + 2 , + 2 , − 2 , − 2 Inorganic Chemistry 5.03 The Free Atom Atomic energy levels, valence orbital ionization energies (VOIE) Quartet ground state, spin multiplicity given by 3 2S + 1 = 2( 2 ) + 1 = 4 3 1 1 3 Four possible values for the spin: + 2 , + 2 , − 2 , − 2 Inorganic Chemistry 5.03 Single versus Triple Bonds Atomic energy levels, valence orbital ionization energies (VOIE) ◦ ∆Hf for P2 is +144 kJ/mol ◦ ∆Hf for P≡N is +104 kJ/mol Inorganic Chemistry 5.03 Single versus Triple Bonds Atomic energy levels, valence orbital ionization energies (VOIE) ◦ ∆Hf for P2 is +144 kJ/mol ◦ ∆Hf for P≡N
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Progress in Quinoidal Singlet Biradical Molecules
    Received: November 2, 2014 | Accepted: November 21, 2014 | Web Released: November 29, 2014 CL-140997 Highlight Review Recent Progress inQuinoidal Singlet Biradical Molecules Takashi Kubo Department of Chemistry, Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, 1-1 Machikaneyama, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-0043 (E-mail: [email protected]) Takashi Kubo was born in Yamaguchi, Japan, in 1968. He graduated from Osaka University in 1991, received M.Sc. in 1993 under the guidance of Professor Ichiro Murata, and received Ph.D. in 1996 under the guidance of Professor Kazuhiro Nakasuji.After working at Mitsubishi Chemical Co., he joined Professor Nakasuji’s group at Department of Chemistry, Graduate School of Science, Osaka University in 2000 as Assistant Professor. In 2006 he served as Associate Professor. Since 2006 he is Professor of Graduate School of Science, Osaka University. He received the Bulletinof the Chemical Society of Japan Award in 2001. His research interests are structural and physical organic chemistry, mainly the syntheses and properties of polycyclic aromatic compounds with open-shell character, and the development of multifunctional materialsusing a cooperative proton- and electron-transfer system. Chem. Lett. 2015, 44, 111–122 | doi:10.1246/cl.140997 © 2015 The Chemical Society of Japan | 111 Abstract Ph Ph Ph Ph Elusive nature inspin state isafeature of singlet biradical Ph Ph Ph Ph molecules and arises from the weak coupling of unpaired 2 l i i li i f i e ectrons. Th shgh ght rev ew ocuses on recent advances n i i i i ’ f l f experimental approaches for elucidating the electronic structure F gure 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Mathematical Operations
    Appendix A Mathematical Operations This appendix presents a number of mathematical techniques and equations for the convenience of the reader. Although we have attempted to sum­ marize accurately some of the most useful relations, we make no attempt at rigor. A bibliography is included at the end of this appendix. A-1 COMPLEX NUMBERS A complex quantity may be represented as follows: u = x + iy = re+i<l> (A-I) where i 2 = -1, x, y, r, and cp are real numbers and ei<l> = cos cp + i sin cpo One refers to x and y as the real and the imaginary components, respectively of u, whereas r is the absolute magnitude of u, that is, r = lui. cp is called the phase angle. The complex conjugate of u, viz., u*, is obtained by changing the sign of i wherever it appears; that is, u* = x - iy. The relation between complex numbers and their conjugates is clarified by representing them as points in the "complex plane" (Argand diagram, see Fig. A-I). The abscissa is chosen to represent the real axis (x), and the ordinate the imaginary axis 391 392 ELECTRON SPIN RESONANCE Imaginary axis u iy ~E2---------t-- Real axis u' Fig. A-l Representation of a point u and of its complex conjugate u* in complex space (Argand diagram). (y). Note that the real component of u is equal to one-half the sum of u and u*; the product of u and its complex conjugate is the square of the absolute magnitude, that is, (A-2) A-2 OPERATOR ALGEBRA A-2a.
    [Show full text]
  • Aggregation-Induced Radical of Donor-Acceptor Organic Semiconductors
    Aggregation-Induced Radical of Donor-Acceptor Organic Semiconductors Zhongxin Chen,1 Yuan Li*,1 Weiya Zhu,1 Zejun Wang,1 Wenqiang Li,1 Miao Zeng,1 Fei Huang*1 1 Institute of Polymer Optoelectronic Materials and Devices, State Key Laboratory of Luminescent Materials and Devices, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, P. R. China * Correspondence author: [email protected], [email protected] Abstract Narrow bandgap donor-acceptor organic semiconductors are generally considered to show closed-shell singlet ground state and their radicals are reported as impurities, polarons, charge transfer state monoradical or defects. Herein, we reported the open-shell singlet diradical electronic ground state of two diketopyrrolopyrrole-based compounds Flu-TDPP and DTP- TDPP via the combination of variable temperature NMR, variable temperature electron spin spectroscopy (ESR), superconducting quantum interference device magnetometry, and theoretical calculations. It is observed that the quinoid-diradical character is significantly enhanced in aggregation state because of the limitation of intramolecular rotation. Consequently, we propose a mechanism of aggregation-induced radical to understand the driving force of the open-shell diradical formation of DTP-TDPP based on the ESR spectroscopy test in different proportions of mixed solvents. Our results demonstrate the thermally-excited triplet state for donor-acceptor organic semiconductors, providing a novel view to comprehend the intrinsic chemical structure of donor-acceptor organic semiconductors, as well as the potential electronic transition process between ground state and excited state. 1 Introduction In the recent more than 30 years, organic semiconductors (OSCs) exhibited great application potential in organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs),1, 2 organic photovoltaics (OPVs),3, 4 organic field-effect transistors (OFETs),5-7 organic photodetectors (OPDs)4 and other organic electronic devices8.
    [Show full text]
  • OXIDE and SEMICONDUCTOR MAGNETISM
    OXIDE and SEMICONDUCTOR MAGNETISM J. M. D. Coey Physics Department, Trinity College, Dublin 2 Ireland. 1. Single-ion effects 2. Collective Effects 3. Examples www.tcd.ie/Physics/Magnetism Boulder July 2003 1 Some references: Magnetic oxides: D. J. Craik (editor) Wiley-Interscience 1975 Magnetism and the chemical bond: J. B. Goodenough Wiley-Interscience 1963 Introduction to ligand field theory. C. Ballhausen McGraw Hill 1962 Mineralogical applications of crystal-field theory. R. G. Burns CUP 1993 (2nd ed.) Point charge calculations of energy levels of magnetic ions in crystalline electric fields. M. T. Hutchings Solid State Physics 16 227 - 73 (1964) Boulder July 2003 2 1. Single-ion effects 1.1 Ubiquity of oxides. Oxide structures. Octahedral and tetrahedral sites. Magnetic ions – 3d, 4d, 4f. 1.2. Electronic structure of free ions (summary). Hund’s rules. g- factors. Paramagnetic susceptibility. 1.3. Ions in solids. Crystal field. Crystal field Hamiltonian. One-electron states. 3d t2g and eg states. Notation. 2p-3d hybridization. One- electron energy-level diagrams in different symmetry. Quenching of orbital moment. Many-electron states. Orgel and Tanabe-Sugano diagrams. 1.4. Crystal field and anisotropy. Single-ion anisotropy. Determination m of Bn . Boulder July 2003 3 1.1 Ubiquity of Oxides Earth’s crust is composed almost entirely of oxides — rocks, economic minerals, water. Composition in atomic % 2- Oxygen (O ) is most abundant Fe O followed by silicon (Si4+) and Si aluminium (Al3+). Al3+ Al Crust is mostly composed of Fe aluminosilicates. Mg Iron (Fe2+/Fe3+) is most O2- Si4+ Ca abundant magnetic element. It is K 40 times as abundant as all other magnetic elements Na together.
    [Show full text]