DOCSLIB.ORG

Using Big Data to Solve Economic and Social Problems

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Using Big Data to Solve Economic and Social Problems Using Big Data to Solve Economic and Social Problems Professor Raj Chetty Stanford University, Spring 2017 Format: This course consists of eleven (11) one hour and twenty minute lectures delivered at Stanford University in Spring 2017 (Economics 45). Description: This introductory course shows how "big data" can be used to understand and solve some of the most important social and economic problems of our time. The course gives students an introduction to frontier research in applied economics and social science that does not require prior coursework in Economics or Statistics. Topics include equality of opportunity, education, health, the environment, and criminal justice. In the context of these topics, the course provides an introduction to basic statistical methods and data analysis techniques, including regression analysis, causal inference, quasi-experimental methods, and machine learning. When taught at Stanford in 2017, the course also included guest lecturers David Leonhardt, Alex Laskey, Jini Kim, Sendhil Mullainathan, and Matthew Gentzkow, who discussed real-world applications of data science; these guest lectures are not included in the online version. Goals: The course has three principal learning objectives: 1) to introduce students to frontier social science research on key social and economic issues in the United States, 2) to teach students how to understand and analyze quantitative data, and 3) to show students to how practitioners use “big data” to analyze social problems. Prerequisites: None. Some prior background in statistics is recommended but not required. Acknowledgements: I am indebted to Rebecca Toseland, the Head Section Leader for the course, for her assistance in helping prepare course materials and organize the class and to the Equality of Opportunity Project research team for developing much of the content in these lectures. 1 Course Outline Part I: Equality of Opportunity 1 Introduction and the Geography of Upward Mobility 2 Policies to Improve Upward Mobility 3 Opportunity, Innovation, and Economic Growth Part II: Education 4 Higher Education 5 Primary Education 6 Do Charter Schools Work? Part III: Health 7 Improving Health Outcomes 8 The Economics of Health Care and Insurance Part IV: Environment 9 Social Costs of Climate Change and Pollution 10 Policies to Mitigate Climate Change Part V: Justice 11 Criminal Justice and Discrimination 2 Reading List Part I: Equality of Opportunity 1 - Introduction and the Geography of Upward Mobility *Einav, Liran, and Jonathan Levin. 2014. “Economics in the Age of Big Data.” Science 346 (6210): 715. *Leonhardt, David. 2013. “In Climbing Income Ladder, Location Matters.” The New York Times. *Leonhardt, David, Amanda Cox, and Claire Cain Miller. 2015. “An Atlas of Upward Mobility Shows Paths Out of Poverty.” The New York Times. *Aisch, Gregor, Eric Buth, Matthew Block, Amanda Cox, and Kevin Quealy. 2015. “The Best and Worst Places to Grow Up: How Your Area Compares.” The New York Times. *Chetty, Raj, Nathaniel Hendren, Patrick Kline, and Emmanuel Saez. 2014. “Where Is the Land of Opportunity? The Geography of Intergenerational Mobility in the United States.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 29 (4): 1553–1623. Non-technical summary * Non-technical summary “The Impacts of Neighborhoods on Intergenerational Mobility ” Optional Reading Badger, Emily and Christopher Ingraham. 2016. “The Striking Power of Poverty to Turn Young Boys into Jobless Men.” The Washington Post. Chetty, Raj, Nathaniel Hendren, Frina Lin, Jeremy Majerovitz, and Benjamin Scuderi. 2016. “Childhood Environment and Gender Gaps in Adulthood.” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 106 (5): 282–88. Non-technical summary Chetty, Raj, and Nathaniel Hendren. 2016. “The Impacts of Neighborhoods on Intergenerational Mobility I: Childhood Exposure Effects.” NBER Working Paper No. 23001. Chetty, Raj, and Nathaniel Hendren. 2016. “The Impacts of Neighborhoods on Intergenerational Mobility II: County-Level Estimates.” NBER Working Paper No. 23002. 3 2 - The Geography of Upward Mobility cont’d and Policies to Improve Upward Mobility *Chetty, Raj, Nathaniel Hendren, and Lawrence F Katz. 2016. “The Effects of Exposure to Better Neighborhoods on Children: New Evidence from the Moving to Opportunity Experiment.” American Economic Review 106 (4): 855–902. Non-technical summary *Davis, Bob. 2016. “Barely Half of 30-Year-Olds Earn More Than Their Parents.” The Wall Street Journal. *Non-technical summary “The Fading American Dream: Trends in Absolute Income Mobility Since 1940.” Optional Reading Chetty, Raj, David Grusky, Maximilian Hell, Nathaniel Hendren, Robert Manduca, and Jimmy Narang. 2016. “The Fading American Dream: Trends in Absolute Income Mobility Since 1940.” NBER Working Paper No. 22910. 3 - Opportunity, Innovation, and Economic Growth *Cimpian, Andrei and Sarah-Jane Leslie. 2017. “Why Young Girls Don’t Think They Are Smart Enough.” The New York Times. *Bian, Lin, Sarah-Jane Leslie, and Andrei Cimpian. 2017. “Gender Stereotypes about Intellectual Ability Emerge Early and Influence Children’s Interests.” Science 391 (6323): 389–91. Optional Reading Alex Bell, Raj Chetty, Xavier Jaravel, Neviana Petkova, John Van Reenen. 2016. “The Lifecycle of Inventors.” Working Paper. Part II: Education 4 – Higher Education * Aisch, Gregor, Larry Buchanan, Amanda Cox, and Kevin Quealy. 2017. “Some Colleges Have More Students From the Top 1 Percent Than the Bottom 60. Find Yours.” The New York Times. *Leonhardt, David. 2017. “America’s Great Working Class Colleges.” The New York Times. 4 *Chetty, Raj, John N Friedman, Emmanuel Saez, Nicholas Turner, and Danny Yagan. 2017. “Mobility Report Cards: The Role of Colleges in Intergenerational Mobility.” Working Paper. Non-technical summary *Hoxby, Caroline Minter, and Christopher Avery. 2013. “The Missing ‘One-Offs’: The Hidden Supply of High-Achieving, Low Income Students.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1–66. Optional Reading Hoxby, Caroline Minter, and Sarah E. Turner. 2015. “What High-Achieving Low-Income Students Know About College.” American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings 105 (5): 514–17. Hoxby, Caroline, and Sarah Turner. 2013. “Expanding College Opportunities for High- Achieving, Low Income Students.” Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research Discussion Paper, no. 12-014: 1–57. 5 - Primary Education *Porter, Eduardo. 2015. “Education Gap Between Rich and Poor is Growing Wider.” The New York Times. *Leonhardt, David. 2010. “The Case for $320,000 Kindergarten Teachers.” The New York Times. *Chetty, Raj, John N. Friedman, Nathaniel Hilger, Emmanuel Saez, Diane Whitmore Schanzenbach, and Danny Yagan. 2011. “How Does Your Kindergarten Classroom Affect Your Earnings? Evidence from Project STAR.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 126 (4): 1593–1660. Non-technical summary. *Non-technical summary “Measuring the Impacts of Teachers I: Evaluating Bias in Teacher Value-Added Estimates.” *Reardon, Sean. 2016. “School Segregation and Racial Academic Achievement Gaps.” Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 2 (5): 34–57. Optional Reading Lowrey, Annie. 2012. “Big Study Links Good Teachers to Lasting Gain.” The New York Times. Chetty, Raj, John N Friedman, and Jonah E Rockoff. 2014. “Measuring the Impacts of Teachers I: Evaluating Bias in Teacher Value-Added Estimates.” American Economic Review 104 (9): 2593–2632. 5 Chetty, Raj, John N Friedman, and Jonah E Rockoff. 2011. “Measuring the Impacts of Teachers II: Teacher Value-Added and Student Outcomes in Adulthood.” American Economic Review 104 (9): 2633–79. Fredriksson, Peter, Björn Öckert, and Hessel Oosterbeek. 2013. “Long-Term Effects of Class Size.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 128 (1): 249–85. Reardon, Sean, Demetra Kalagrides, and Kenneth Shores. 2016. “The Geography of Racial/ Ethnic Test Score Gaps.” CEPA Working Paper, no. 16. Guest Lecture #1: David Leonhardt, Columnist & Founding Editor of The Upshot, The New York Times David Leonhardt is an Op-Ed columnist for The New York Times. David was previously the Washington bureau chief and the founding editor of The Upshot, a Times website covering politics and policy. In 2011, he received the Pulitzer Prize for commentary, for his columns on the financial crisis and its aftermath. As a staff writer for The Times Magazine, he won the Gerald Loeb Award in 2009 for the story, “Obamanomics.” He is the author of the best-selling e- book, “Here’s the Deal: How Washington Can Solve the Deficit and Spur Growth.” 6 – Do Charter Schools Work? *Leonhardt, David. 2016. “Schools That Work.” The New York Times. *Chabrier, Julia, Sarah Cohodes, and Philip Oreopoulous. 2016. “What Can We Learn From Charter School Lotteries?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 30 (3): 57–84. Optional Reading Abdulkadiroǧlu, Atila, Joshua D. Angrist, Susan M. Dynarski, Thomas J. Kane, and Parag A. Pathak. 2011. “Accountability and Flexibility in Public Schools: Evidence from Boston’s Charters and Pilots.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 126 (2): 699–748. Dobbie, Will, and Roland G. Fryer. 2011. “Are High-Quality Schools Enough to Increase Achievement among the Poor? Evidence from the Harlem Children’s Zone.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 3 (3): 158–87. Baude, Patrick, Marcus Casey, Eric A Hanushek, and Steven G Rivkin. 2014. “The Evolution of Charter School Quality.” NBER Working Paper 20645. 6 Part III: Health 7 – Improving Health Outcomes *Irwin, Neil and Quoctrung Bui. 2016. “The Rich Live Longer Everywhere. For the Poor, Geography Matters.”
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Historical Evidence from US Newspapers Matthew Gentzkow, Jesse M
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES COMPETITION AND IDEOLOGICAL DIVERSITY: HISTORICAL EVIDENCE FROM US NEWSPAPERS Matthew Gentzkow Jesse M. Shapiro Michael Sinkinson Working Paper 18234 http://www.nber.org/papers/w18234 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 July 2012 We are grateful to Alan Bester, Ambarish Chandra, Tim Conley, Christian Hansen, Igal Hendel, Caroline Hoxby, Jon Levin, Kevin Murphy, Andrei Shleifer, E. Glen Weyl, and numerous seminar participants for advice and suggestions, and to our dedicated research assistants for important contributions to this project. This research was funded in part by the Initiative on Global Markets, the George J. Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State, the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation, the Centel Foundation/Robert P. Reuss Faculty Research Fund, the Neubauer Family Foundation and the Kathryn C. Gould Research Fund, all at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business, the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, and the National Science Foundation. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer- reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2012 by Matthew Gentzkow, Jesse M. Shapiro, and Michael Sinkinson. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Competition and Ideological Diversity: Historical Evidence from US Newspapers Matthew Gentzkow, Jesse M.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes and Sources for Evil Geniuses: the Unmaking of America: a Recent History
    Notes and Sources for Evil Geniuses: The Unmaking of America: A Recent History Introduction xiv “If infectious greed is the virus” Kurt Andersen, “City of Schemes,” The New York Times, Oct. 6, 2002. xvi “run of pedal-to-the-medal hypercapitalism” Kurt Andersen, “American Roulette,” New York, December 22, 2006. xx “People of the same trade” Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations, ed. Andrew Skinner, 1776 (London: Penguin, 1999) Book I, Chapter X. Chapter 1 4 “The discovery of America offered” Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy In America, trans. Arthur Goldhammer (New York: Library of America, 2012), Book One, Introductory Chapter. 4 “A new science of politics” Tocqueville, Democracy In America, Book One, Introductory Chapter. 4 “The inhabitants of the United States” Tocqueville, Democracy In America, Book One, Chapter XVIII. 5 “there was virtually no economic growth” Robert J Gordon. “Is US economic growth over? Faltering innovation confronts the six headwinds.” Policy Insight No. 63. Centre for Economic Policy Research, September, 2012. --Thomas Piketty, “World Growth from the Antiquity (growth rate per period),” Quandl. 6 each citizen’s share of the economy Richard H. Steckel, “A History of the Standard of Living in the United States,” in EH.net (Economic History Association, 2020). --Andrew McAfee and Erik Brynjolfsson, The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies (New York: W.W. Norton, 2016), p. 98. 6 “Constant revolutionizing of production” Friedrich Engels and Karl Marx, Manifesto of the Communist Party (Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1969), Chapter I. 7 from the early 1840s to 1860 Tomas Nonnenmacher, “History of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Preschool Television Viewing and Adolescent Test Scores: Historical Evidence from the Coleman Study
    PRESCHOOL TELEVISION VIEWING AND ADOLESCENT TEST SCORES: HISTORICAL EVIDENCE FROM THE COLEMAN STUDY MATTHEW GENTZKOW AND JESSE M. SHAPIRO We use heterogeneity in the timing of television’s introduction to different local markets to identify the effect of preschool television exposure on standardized test scores during adolescence. Our preferred point estimate indicates that an additional year of preschool television exposure raises average adolescent test scores by about 0.02 standard deviations. We are able to reject negative effects larger than about 0.03 standard deviations per year of television exposure. For reading and general knowledge scores, the positive effects we find are marginally statistically significant, and these effects are largest for children from households where English is not the primary language, for children whose mothers have less than a high school education, and for nonwhite children. I. INTRODUCTION Television has attracted young viewers since broadcasting be- gan in the 1940s. Concerns about its effects on the cognitive devel- opment of young children emerged almost immediately and have been fueled by academic research showing a negative association between early-childhood television viewing and later academic achievement.1 These findings have contributed to a belief among the vast majority of pediatricians that television has “negative effects on brain development” of children below age five (Gentile et al. 2004). They have also provided partial motivation for re- cent recommendations that preschool children’s television view- ing time be severely restricted (American Academy of Pediatrics 2001). According to a widely cited report on media use by young * We are grateful to Dominic Brewer, John Collins, Ronald Ehrenberg, Eric Hanushek, and Mary Morris (at ICPSR) for assistance with Coleman study data, and to Christopher Berry for supplying data on school quality.
    [Show full text]
  • The Donald Trump-Rupert Murdoch Relationship in the United States
    The Donald Trump-Rupert Murdoch relationship in the United States When Donald Trump ran as a candidate for the Republican presidential nomination, Rupert Murdoch was reported to be initially opposed to him, so the Wall Street Journal and the New York Post were too.1 However, Roger Ailes and Murdoch fell out because Ailes wanted to give more positive coverage to Trump on Fox News.2 Soon afterwards, however, Fox News turned more negative towards Trump.3 As Trump emerged as the inevitable winner of the race for the nomination, Murdoch’s attitude towards Trump appeared to shift, as did his US news outlets.4 Once Trump became the nominee, he and Rupert Murdoch effectively concluded an alliance of mutual benefit: Murdoch’s news outlets would help get Trump elected, and then Trump would use his powers as president in ways that supported Rupert Murdoch’s interests. An early signal of this coming together was Trump’s public attacks on the AT&T-Time Warner merger, 21st Century Fox having tried but failed to acquire Time Warner previously in 2014. Over the last year and a half, Fox News has been the major TV news supporter of Donald Trump. Its coverage has displayed extreme bias in his favour, offering fawning coverage of his actions and downplaying or rubbishing news stories damaging to him, while also leading attacks against Donald Trump’s opponent in the 2016 presidential election, Hillary Clinton. Ofcom itself ruled that several Sean Hannity programmes in August 2016 were so biased in favour of Donald Trump and against Hillary Clinton that they breached UK impartiality rules.5 During this period, Rupert Murdoch has been CEO of Fox News, in which position he is also 1 See e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES TEXT AS DATA Matthew Gentzkow
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES TEXT AS DATA Matthew Gentzkow Bryan T. Kelly Matt Taddy Working Paper 23276 http://www.nber.org/papers/w23276 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 March 2017 The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. At least one co-author has disclosed a financial relationship of potential relevance for this research. Further information is available online at http://www.nber.org/papers/w23276.ack NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer-reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2017 by Matthew Gentzkow, Bryan T. Kelly, and Matt Taddy. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Text as Data Matthew Gentzkow, Bryan T. Kelly, and Matt Taddy NBER Working Paper No. 23276 March 2017 JEL No. C1 ABSTRACT An ever increasing share of human interaction, communication, and culture is recorded as digital text. We provide an introduction to the use of text as an input to economic research. We discuss the features that make text different from other forms of data, offer a practical overview of relevant statistical methods, and survey a variety of applications. Matthew Gentzkow Matt Taddy Department of Economics Microsoft Research New England Stanford University 1 Memorial Drive 579 Serra Mall Cambridge MA 02142 Stanford, CA 94305 and University of Chicago Booth School of Business and NBER [email protected] [email protected] Bryan T.
    [Show full text]
  • Matthew Gentzkow, Winner of the 2014 Clark Medal
    Matthew Gentzkow, Winner of the 2014 Clark Medal The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Shleifer, Andrei. 2015. “Matthew Gentzkow, Winner of the 2014 Clark Medal.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 29 (1): 181–92. https:// doi.org/10.1257/jep.29.1.181. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:41555813 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 29, Number 1—Winter 2015—Pages 181–192 Matthew Gentzkow, Winner of the 2014 Clark Medal Andrei Shleifer he 2014 John Bates Clark Medal of the American Economic Association was awarded to Matthew Gentzkow of the University of Chicago Booth School T of Business. The citation recognized Matt’s “fundamental contributions to our understanding of the economic forces driving the creation of media products, the changing nature and role of media in the digital environment, and the effect of media on education and civic engagement.” In addition to his work on the media, Matt has made a number of significant contributions to empirical industrial organi- zation more broadly, as well as to applied economic theory. In this essay, I highlight some of these contributions, which are listed on Table 1. I will be referring to these papers by their number on this list.
    [Show full text]
  • PBPL 40 Syllabus
    COURSE OUTLINE Rockefeller Center Public Policy 40: Economics of Public Policymaking Summer 2019 Professor Charlie Wheelan 209A Rockefeller O) 603-646-4086 E-mail: [email protected] Office hours: Wednesdays 10:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m. or by appointment OBJECTIVES The course will use the basic tools of economics to analyze current public policy issues in the United States. Given the time constraints of the course, we will focus on the most significant issues facing the country. The goal is to understand both the substance and politics of each issue. We will examine the effects of recent policy changes and analyze the likely effects of prospective reforms, particularly those that are currently being debated or implemented. In general, the Tuesday class will provide background on the policy issue at hand. The Thursday class will consist of student presentations and discussion. Given the broad scope of the course, students should expect a heavy reading load. CANVAS There is a Canvas site for the course where announcements, readings, grades and other material related to the course will be posted. READING The required texts must be ordered online. They are also on reserve at Baker. All other readings will be posted on the Canvas site. You are responsible for doing all readings before the class for which they are assigned. Please note that for copyright reasons, you will only be able to access readings posted on Canvas from a computer recognized as part of the Dartmouth community. COMPUTERS Please do not use computers or other electronic devices in class.
    [Show full text]
  • A N N U a L R E P O R T
    A N N U A L R E P O R T 2014 – 2015 SIEPR’s Mission The Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research supports research, trains undergraduate and graduate students, and shares nonpartisan scholarship that will lead to better economic policies in the United States and abroad. Table of Contents From the Director 2 New Faculty 4 Policy Impact 6 Young Scholars Program 8 Student Support 9 Events and Conferences 14 Policy Briefs 18 Income and Expenditures 19 Research Centers and Programs 20 Development 24 Donors 28 Visitors 32 Senior Fellows 34 Steering Committee 38 Advisory Board 39 ANNUAL REPORT | 2014 – 2015 1 From the Director Dear Friends, My first six months as the Trione Director of the undergraduates working as research assistants with Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research have been SIEPR scholars. We have also organized a number of marked with significant activity. We added more than a policy forums that were geared toward students, including dozen faculty to our Senior Fellow ranks in the Fall. They one on innovation challenges for the next presidential include Professors from the Department of Economics administration and others that focused on the “app along with the schools of Business, Education, Law, and economy” and the evolution of finance. Medicine. We also welcomed 11 Assistant Professors as We have hosted some of the most important and Faculty Fellows. These additions mean SIEPR’s arsenal of influential leaders in government and business who have expertise on economic policy includes more shared with us their insights on economic than 80 faculty from all seven Stanford schools policy and many other issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf; Last Accessed August 10, 2012
    Notes Chapter 1 1. There are, of course, many “Americas.” Here, I use the word “America” interchangeably with the “United States.” I also use the words “work” and “labor” interchangeably throughout this book. This is a self-conscious decision in spite of the distinction Hannah Arendt draws between work and labor. See Hannah Arendt, The Human Condition (Chicago: Univer- sity of Chicago Press, 1998). 2. To be sure, the occurrence of the word “dream” in these speeches may or may not refer to the American Dream as such. Yet, a close reading of the texts yields the conclusion that it most often does. These speeches are available at the University of California, Santa Barbara’s “American Presidency Project” website. Available at http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/; last accessed August 5, 2012. The numbers cited here reflect the follow- ing methodological considerations: (a) I have only taken into account the first of a series of six State of the Union addresses by Richard Nixon (1973); (b) I have excluded Reagan’s (1981), Bush’s (1989), Clinton’s (1993), Bush’s (2001), and Obama’s (2009) addresses before joint sessions of Congress because these were not technically State of the Union mes- sages; and (c) the word “undreamed” has been counted as an occurrence of the word “dream.” 3. See, especially, figure 2.1. More generally, see chapters 3 and 6. 4. Jennifer L. Hochschild, Facing Up to the American Dream: Race, Class, and the Soul of the Nation (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995), xvii. 5. National League of Cities, “The American Dream in 2004: A Sur- vey of the American People” (Washington D.C., 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • Media Bias in the Marketplace: Theory
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES MEDIA BIAS IN THE MARKETPLACE: THEORY Matthew Gentzkow Jesse M. Shapiro Daniel F. Stone Working Paper 19880 http://www.nber.org/papers/w19880 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 February 2014 In preparation for the Handbook of Media Economics, Simon Anderson, David Strömberg and Joel Waldfogel, eds. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. At least one co-author has disclosed a financial relationship of potential relevance for this research. Further information is available online at http://www.nber.org/papers/w19880.ack NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer- reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2014 by Matthew Gentzkow, Jesse M. Shapiro, and Daniel F. Stone. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Media Bias in the Marketplace: Theory Matthew Gentzkow, Jesse M. Shapiro, and Daniel F. Stone NBER Working Paper No. 19880 February 2014 JEL No. D21 ABSTRACT We review the theoretical literature on market determinants of media bias. We present a theoretical framework that organizes many key themes in the literature, and discuss substantive lessons. Matthew Gentzkow Daniel F. Stone University of Chicago Bowdoin College Booth School of Business Department of Economics 5807 South Woodlawn Avenue 108 Hubbard Hall Chicago, IL 60637 Brunswick, Maine · 04011 and NBER [email protected] [email protected] Jesse M.
    [Show full text]
  • Bayesian Persuasion†
    American Economic Review 101 (October 2011): 2590–2615 http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi 10.1257/aer.101.6.2590 = Bayesian Persuasion† By Emir Kamenica and Matthew Gentzkow* When is it possible for one person to persuade another to change her action? We consider a symmetric information model where a sender chooses a signal to reveal to a receiver, who then takes a noncon- tractible action that affects the welfare of both players. We derive necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of a signal that strictly benefits the sender. We characterize sender-optimal signals. We examine comparative statics with respect to the alignment of the sender’s and the receiver’s preferences. Finally, we apply our results to persuasion by litigators, lobbyists, and salespeople. JEL D72, D82, D83, K40, M31 ( ) Suppose one person, call him Sender, wishes to persuade another, call her Receiver, to change her action. If Receiver is a rational Bayesian, can Sender per- suade her to take an action he would prefer over the action she was originally going to take? If Receiver understands that Sender chose what information to convey with the intent of manipulating her action for his own benefit, can Sender still gain from persuasion? If so, what is the optimal way to persuade? These questions are of substantial economic importance. As Donald McCloskey and Arjo Klamer 1995 emphasize, attempts at persuasion command a sizable share ( ) of our resources. Persuasion, as we will define it below, plays an important role in advertising, courts, lobbying, financial disclosure, and political campaigns, among many other economic activities.
    [Show full text]
  • The New York Times 2014 Innovation Report
    Innovation March 24, 2014 Executive Summary Innovation March 24, 2014 2 Executive Summary Introduction and Flipboard often get more traffic from Times journalism than we do. The New York Times is winning at journalism. Of all In contrast, over the last year The Times has the challenges facing a media company in the digi- watched readership fall significantly. Not only is the tal age, producing great journalism is the hardest. audience on our website shrinking but our audience Our daily report is deep, broad, smart and engaging on our smartphone apps has dipped, an extremely — and we’ve got a huge lead over the competition. worrying sign on a growing platform. At the same time, we are falling behind in a sec- Our core mission remains producing the world’s ond critical area: the art and science of getting our best journalism. But with the endless upheaval journalism to readers. We have always cared about in technology, reader habits and the entire busi- the reach and impact of our work, but we haven’t ness model, The Times needs to pursue smart new done enough to crack that code in the digital era. strategies for growing our audience. The urgency is This is where our competitors are pushing ahead only growing because digital media is getting more of us. The Washington Post and The Wall Street crowded, better funded and far more innovative. Journal have announced aggressive moves in re- The first section of this report explores in detail cent months to remake themselves for this age. First the need for the newsroom to take the lead in get- Look Media and Vox Media are creating newsrooms ting more readers to spend more time reading more custom-built for digital.
    [Show full text]