Wild Water Buffalo Bubalus Arnee in Koshi Tappu Wildlife Reserve, Nepal: Status, Population and Conservation Importance

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Wild Water Buffalo Bubalus Arnee in Koshi Tappu Wildlife Reserve, Nepal: Status, Population and Conservation Importance JoTT COMMUNI C ATION 4(14): 3294–3301 Wild Water Buffalo Bubalus arnee in Koshi Tappu Wildlife Reserve, Nepal: status, population and conservation importance Top Bahadur Khatri 1, Deep Narayan Shah 2 & Nilamber Mishra 3 1,2 Conservation and Sustainable Use of Wetlands in Nepal (CSUWN), Training Section Building, Second floor, Forestry Complex, Babar Mahal, Kathmandu, Nepal 3 Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation, Koshi Tappu Wildlife Reserve, Paschim Kusaha, Sunsari, Nepal Email: 1 [email protected], 2 [email protected] (corresponding author), 3 [email protected] Date of publication (online): 26 November 2012 Abstract: The Asiatic Wild Water Buffalo Bubalus arnee is an endangered species Date of publication (print): 26 November 2012 restricted to South and Southeast Asia. Nepal’s only population survives in the Koshi ISSN 0974-7907 (online) | 0974-7893 (print) Tappu Wildlife Reserve which is located on the floodplain of the Koshi River, a tributary of Ganga. This species is under threat due to high anthropogenic pressure ranging Editor: L.A.K. Singh from habitat deterioration to hybridization with domestic buffalo. Yet, the population has Manuscript details: grown from 63 in 1976 to 219 in 2009, despite the decline in the calf/cow ratio. The Ms # o2990 present study conducted in 2009 used the block count method. The count showed the Received 06 November 2011 presence of a backcrossed population of 74 in addition to the total of 219 individuals. At Final received 09 July 2012 present, a number of conservation and livelihood interventions have been undertaken Finally accepted 29 September 2012 to safeguard the biodiversity, particularly the wild buffalo population in the Koshi Tappu Wildlife Reserve. The community-based sustainable management approach benefiting Citation: Khatri, T.B., D.N. Shah & N. Mishra (2012). Wild Water Buffalo Bubalus arnee in both conservation and livelihood of local people is necessary to ensure the long term Koshi Tappu Wildlife Reserve, Nepal: status, conservation of the species. population and conservation importance. Journal of Threatened Taxa 4(14): 3294–3301. Keywords: Bubalus arnee, Critically Endangered, Koshi flood, population census. Copyright: © Top Bahadur Khatri, Deep Narayan Shah & Nilamber Mishra 2012. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. JoTT allows unrestricted use of this article in any INTRODUCTION medium for non-profit purposes, reproduction and distribution by providing adequate credit to the authors and the source of publication. The genus Bubalus was widely distributed in Europe and southern Asia Author Details: TOP BAHADUR KHA T RI ’s research in the Pleistocene age, but was later restricted to the Indian subcontinent interests are in resource management, park- and Southeast Asia (Mason 1974). Today, the Asiatic Wild Water Buffalo people interface, community stewardship and wetland conservation in Asia. He has been Bubalus arnee (Bubalus bubalis Groves 1981) occurs in India, Nepal, implementing various integrated conservation and development projects in and around the Bhutan, Myanmar, Thailand and Cambodia. They are associated with protected areas of Nepal for over two decades. wet grasslands, swamps and densely vegetated river valleys. They have DEEP NARAYA N SHAH ’s research interests are in biodiversity, community ecology, biogeography, been extirpated in Pakistan, Bangladesh, Laos and Vietnam. Nepal’s only population genetics and conservation biology. In particular, he focuses on the influence of population thrives in the Koshi Tappu Wildlife Reserve (KTWR) which is global climate and human land-use change located on the floodplain of a snow-fed perennial river, Koshi, a tributary on animal population and communities. He has been conducting research in the Hindu of Ganga. The KTWR was gazetted in 1976 to preserve the habitat for the Kush Himalayan region and is associated with several national and international scientific only remaining population of Bubalus arnee here as Arna in Nepal. This organizations. species is categorized as Endangered (Hedges et al. 2008) on the IUCN NILAM B ER MI S HRA ’s research interests are in the ecology and conservation of the large mammals Red List. of South Asia. He has been working as Conservation Officer (Warden) in the protected The wild water buffalo is highly endangered, with a world population areas of Nepal for over two decades. considered by FAO to be certainly fewer than 4000 animals (Scherf Author Contribution: DNS conceived, designed 2000). Scherf (2000) indicated that small isolated populations may and performed the study and wrote up the paper. TBK planned the study and NM contributed in the remain in the Koshi Tappu Wildlife Reserve (Nepal), Bastar and Raipur study design and performed field study. districts of Madhya Pradesh and Manas Wildlife Sanctuary/Project Tiger Acknowledgements: See end of this article. Reserve (India), Royal Manas National Park (Bhutan), and Huai Kha urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:263B7577-CE69- Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuary (Thailand), as these populations are believed 44F2-9A96-13A775791AF5 to have been least affected by interbreeding with domestic and/or feral buffalo. Flamand et al. (2003) confirmed eight out of 10 wild buffalo OPEN ACCESS | FREE DOWNLOAD samples to be of pure wild variety genetically at KTWR. The census of 3294 Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | November 2012 | 4(14): 3294–3301 Arna in Koshi Tappu T.B. Khatri et al. Arna in KTWR has been carried out since 1976 and people, not only of Nepal but also of India. After the till now five censuses have been conducted at four breach of the eastern embankment, efforts were made uneven intervals over a 34-year period. The most to revert the main channel back to its original course recent census was in 2004 that estimated a population by employing over hundreds of heavy machines and of 159 wild buffalo, and a highly backcrossed, semi- equipments backed by a strong fleet of over 1000 feral population of 49 animals (Heinen & Kandel personnel for a period of over one year. The Reserve 2006). The global and national status of this species as had to cope with all the externalities like temporary documented by IUCN’s Asian Wild Cattle and Buffalo settlements within the reserve, supply of fuel wood Specialist Group and the American Zoo Association and fodder, excessive use of local resources by both suggested that appropriate management is of the local people as well as by the construction company highest conservation priority. that was engaged in the repair and maintenance work The KTWR has faced Reserve-people conflicts of the breached embankment. During the course of since its establishment. The effect of human repair and maintenance, six male Arna were moved disturbance varies greatly, depending on the nature 5km south of the barrage (in Gobargarha Village) and its intensity. Therefore, realizing the above from their habitat due to the high level of disturbance. situation, the Government of Nepal in 2004, declared During this period, the reserve had to bear the brunt of a surrounding area of 173.5km2 as a buffer zone. this natural disaster. This is one of the country’s innovative strategies for During the period of political instability and participatory conservation, emphasizing a buffer conflict, all the security posts were damaged and zone mechanism designed to reduce the adverse the security personnel were withdrawn and merged impact of protected areas on the livelihoods of within the reserve headquarters, Kushaha. As a result, local communities and vice versa. The total human law enforcement became very weak due to which population of the buffer zone in 2009 was 93,323 from encroachment, illegal grazing, harvesting of resources 16,280 households. As mandated by the Buffer Zone became rampant. Management Regulations, the buffer zone is entitled The main threat to the wild buffalo is the continued to receive a 50% share of the revenue generated by the mixing and mingling of the wild and the domestic KTWR for community development activities. The stocks resulting in hybridization. In addition, as a result money received is channeled through the user groups. of the Koshi flood of 2008, there were speculations These user groups are formed at the settlement level of a wide scale loss of this species. Therefore, to and are responsible for the planning, management and ascertain the status, a census was conducted jointly supervision of the activities implemented. by the Department of National Parks and Wildlife The Koshi River meanders and passes through the Conservation (DNPWC) and the Conservation and KTWR. The river not only shapes the physical features Sustainable Use of Wetlands in Nepal (CSUWN). of the region, but also modifies the ecosystem of the Here we report the current findings and compare it area and has profound impact on the socio-economic with earlier censuses. Furthermore, we have assessed characteristics of the local communities of the buffer the current management practices to provide future zone residents. The Koshi River, which changes its management guidance. course quite rapidly across years, changed its main course dramatically during the monsoon of 2008 and breached a 2km stretch and entered the human MATERIALS AND METHODS settlements through Kushaha Village (Khatri et al. 2010a). This sudden shift in the course of Koshi River Study area has had a profound effect in the physical landscape KTWR (86055’–87005’E & 26034’–26045’N) and subsequent impacts towards human settlement lies in the alluvial flood plains of the Koshi River of and their agricultural fields. Large tracts of forest near eastern Nepal (Fig. 1). The flood plain is a complex Prakashpur Village and grasslands in the eastern part mosaic of lotic and lentic ecosystems, characterized by of the region were totally washed away. The Koshi grassy marshes, oxbow lakes, swamp lakes and many breach brought untold misery and loss to the lives of depressions which retain water throughout the year. Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | November 2012 | 4(14): 3294–3301 3295 Arna in Koshi Tappu T.B.
Recommended publications
  • Endangered Species
    Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Article Talk Read Edit View history Endangered species From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Main page Contents For other uses, see Endangered species (disambiguation). Featured content "Endangered" redirects here. For other uses, see Endangered (disambiguation). Current events An endangered species is a species which has been categorized as likely to become Random article Conservation status extinct . Endangered (EN), as categorized by the International Union for Conservation of Donate to Wikipedia by IUCN Red List category Wikipedia store Nature (IUCN) Red List, is the second most severe conservation status for wild populations in the IUCN's schema after Critically Endangered (CR). Interaction In 2012, the IUCN Red List featured 3079 animal and 2655 plant species as endangered (EN) Help worldwide.[1] The figures for 1998 were, respectively, 1102 and 1197. About Wikipedia Community portal Many nations have laws that protect conservation-reliant species: for example, forbidding Recent changes hunting , restricting land development or creating preserves. Population numbers, trends and Contact page species' conservation status can be found in the lists of organisms by population. Tools Extinct Contents [hide] What links here Extinct (EX) (list) 1 Conservation status Related changes Extinct in the Wild (EW) (list) 2 IUCN Red List Upload file [7] Threatened Special pages 2.1 Criteria for 'Endangered (EN)' Critically Endangered (CR) (list) Permanent link 3 Endangered species in the United
    [Show full text]
  • (Bubalus Bubalis) in NEPAL: RECOMMENDED MANAGEMENT ACTION in the FACE of UNCERTAINTY for a CRITICALLY ENDANGERED SPECIES
    Contents TIGERPAPER A Translocation Proposal for Wild Buffalo in Nepal................... 1 Eucalyptus – Bane or Boon?................................................... 8 Status and Distribution of Wild Cattle in Cambodia.................... 9 Reptile Richness and Diversity In and Around Gir Forest........... 15 A Comparison of Identification Techniques for Predators on Artificial Nests................................................................... 20 Devastating Flood in Kaziranga National Park............................ 24 Bird Damage to Guava and Papaya........................................... 27 Death of an Elephant by Sunstroke in Orissa............................. 31 Msc in Forest and Nature Conservation for Tropical Areas......... 32 FOREST NEWS Report of an International Conference on Community Involvement in Fire Management............................................ 1 ASEAN Senior Officials Endorse Code of Practice for Forest Harvesting.................................................................. 4 Asian Model Forests Develop Criteria and Indicators Guidelines............................................................................. 4 East Asian Countries Pledge Action on Illegal Forest Activities.............................................................................. 6 South Pacific Ministers Consider Forestry Issues........................ 9 Tropical Ecosystems, Structure, Diversity and Human Welfare.. 10 Draft Webpage for International Weem Network......................... 10 New FAO Forestry Publications...............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Process Framework for Involuntary Restrictions 10 March 2020 CEPF
    Process Framework for Involuntary Restrictions 10 March 2020 CEPF-110337 BirdLife International Inundated forest conservation through wetland restoration and disease reduction Siem Pang Wildlife Sanctuary, Cambodia Grant Summary 1. Grantee organization: BirdLife International Cambodia Programme 2. Grant title. Inundated forest conservation through wetland restoration and disease reduction 3. Grant number. CEPF-110337 4. Grant amount (US dollars): US$ 179,996 5. Proposed dates of grant: 5/1/2020-4/30/2022 6. Countries or territories where project will be undertaken: Cambodia 7. Date of preparation of this document: 10 March 2020 The Process Framework will describe the project and how restrictions of access to natural resources and measures to assist affected communities. Affected communities should have the opportunity to participate in the drafting of the Process Framework. Typically, the Applicant will prepare a draft Framework that will then be shared and discussed with local communities and other relevant stakeholders. Based on the consultations, a final Framework will be prepared. CEPF may provide guidance on development of the Framework and will review and approve the final Framework prior to approving the final project proposal application. The Process Framework should include the following elements: A. Project background Siem Pang Wildlife Sanctuary (formerly commonly known as Western Siem Pang Wildlife Sanctuary) and hereafter SPWS, is located in the Northern Plains Seasonally Inundated Forests and the Sekong River, part of the Mekong River 3S Rivers Confluence flows through the site. This site, inundated for part of the year, includes over 200 ephemeral wetlands known as trapeangs. Trapeangs are a vital source of food and water for wildlife including important populations of two CEPF priority species the Critically Endangered White-shouldered ibis Pseudibis davisoni and Giant Ibis Thaumatibis gigantea (Gray et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bushmeat Crisis : Fact Sheet
    Fact Sheet The Bushmeat Crisis The following statistics have been taken from the report Conservation & Use of Wildlife‐Based Resources: the Bushmeat Crisis (Nasi et al). Original sources can be found in this report. Wildlife & Ecological Function Although every organism contributes to ecosystem processes, the nature and magnitude of individual species contributions vary considerably. Therefore activities, such as hunting, have the potential to not only impact targeted species but the ecosystem more broadly. Keystone species: those species whose loss has a disproportionate impact on the community when compared to the loss of other species. For example, large cats’ extirpation triggers an uncontrolled growth of the prey population which in turn dramatically increases browsing or grazing intensity to the point where forest regeneration can be totally prevented; Elephants have a tremendous role in modifying vegetation structure and composition through their feeding habits (differential herbivory, seed dispersal) and movements in the forest (killing a large number of small trees). Wildlife – Economics, Nutrition & Culture Proteins obtained from hunting wild animals are crucial for the survival of many forest‐ dependent people of the Congo Basin. In Gabon, the annual bushmeat trade has been valued at US$25 million (€18.5 million). In West and Central Africa, estimates of the value of the bushmeat trade range from US$42 to US$205 million (€31‐151 million) per year. Researchers estimate that the current harvest of bushmeat in Central Africa amounts to more than 1 million tonnes annually—the equivalent of almost four million head of cattle The value of wild meat harvested in the Amazon basin exceeds US$ 175 million per year.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Community Knowledge to Identify Potential Hotspots of Mammal Diversity in Southeastern Nepal
    Using community knowledge to identify potential hotspots of mammal diversity in southeastern Nepal Teri D. Allendorf, Bhim Gurung, Shashank Poudel, Sagar Dahal & Sanjan Thapa Biodiversity and Conservation ISSN 0960-3115 Biodivers Conserv DOI 10.1007/s10531-019-01919-0 1 23 Your article is protected by copyright and all rights are held exclusively by Springer Nature B.V.. This e-offprint is for personal use only and shall not be self-archived in electronic repositories. If you wish to self-archive your article, please use the accepted manuscript version for posting on your own website. You may further deposit the accepted manuscript version in any repository, provided it is only made publicly available 12 months after official publication or later and provided acknowledgement is given to the original source of publication and a link is inserted to the published article on Springer's website. The link must be accompanied by the following text: "The final publication is available at link.springer.com”. 1 23 Author's personal copy Biodiversity and Conservation https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01919-0 ORIGINAL PAPER Using community knowledge to identify potential hotspots of mammal diversity in southeastern Nepal Teri D. Allendorf1 · Bhim Gurung2 · Shashank Poudel3 · Sagar Dahal4 · Sanjan Thapa4,5 Received: 1 July 2019 / Revised: 10 November 2019 / Accepted: 5 December 2019 © Springer Nature B.V. 2019 Abstract Nepal has been relatively successful in conserving its wildlife by pioneering innovative approaches to conservation, such as beneft sharing in protected area bufer zones and landscape-level conservation approaches. However, compared to other areas of Nepal, the biodiversity of the southeast has received less attention, both in terms of research and con- servation.
    [Show full text]
  • Antelopes, Gazelles, Cattle, Goats, Sheep, and Relatives
    © Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical means without prior written permission of the publisher. INTRODUCTION RECOGNITION The family Bovidae, which includes Antelopes, Cattle, Duikers, Gazelles, Goats, and Sheep, is the largest family within Artiodactyla and the most diverse family of ungulates, with more than 270 recent species. Their common characteristic is their unbranched, non-deciduous horns. Bovids are primarily Old World in their distribution, although a few species are found in North America. The name antelope is often used to describe many members of this family, but it is not a definable, taxonomically based term. Shape, size, and color: Bovids encompass an extremely wide size range, from the minuscule Royal Antelope and the Dik-diks, weighing as little as 2 kg and standing 25 to 35 cm at the shoulder, to the Asian Wild Water Buffalo, which weighs as much as 1,200 kg, and the Gaur, which measures up to 220 cm at the shoulder. Body shape varies from relatively small, slender-limbed, and thin-necked species such as the Gazelles to the massive, stocky wild cattle (fig. 1). The forequarters may be larger than the hind, or the reverse, as in smaller species inhabiting dense tropical forests (e.g., Duikers). There is also a great variety in body coloration, although most species are some shade of brown. It can consist of a solid shade, or a patterned pelage. Antelopes that rely on concealment to avoid predators are cryptically colored. The stripes and blotches seen on the hides of Bushbuck, Bongo, and Kudu also function as camouflage by helping to disrupt the animals’ outline.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Material Table S1. Potential Species That Gyps Vultures
    Supplementary material Table S1. Potential species that Gyps vultures scavenge on across Indian subcontinent. English name Scientific name Bovidae Banteng Bos javanicus Indian cow Bos indicus European cow Bos taurus Gaur Bos gaurus Yak Bos grunniens Domestic water buffalo Bubalus bubalis Wild water buffalo Bubalus arnee Goat Capra hircus Markhor Capra falconeri Sheep Ovis aries Blue sheep Pseudois nayaur Himalayan tahr Hemitragus jemlahicus Nilgiri tahr Nilgiritragus hylocrius Ghoral Naemorhedus goral Takin Budorcas taxicolor Chinkara Gazella bennetii Blackbuck Antilope cervicapra Nilgai Boselaphus tragocamelus Four-horned antelope Tetracerus quadricornis Cervidae Spotted deer Axis axis Hog deer Hyelaphus porcinus Red deer Cervus elaphus Barasingha Rucervus duvaucelii Sambar Rusa unicolor Muntjac Muntiacus muntjak Manipur brow-antlered deer Rucervus eldii Chevrotain Moschiola indica Camelids Dromedary Camelus dromedarius Bactrian camel Camelus bactrianus Suidae Wild boar Sus scrofa cristatus Domestic pig Sus scrofa domesticus Perissodactyla Horse Equus caballus Donkey Equus asinus Wild ass Equus hemonius Greater one-horned rhinoceros Rhinoceros unicornis Indian Elephant Elephas maximus Carnivora Dhole Cuon alpinus Golden jackal Canis aureus Dog Canis familiaris Wolf Canis lupus Leopard Panthera pardus Tiger Panthera tigris Sloth bear Melursus ursinus Himalayan bear Ursus thibetanus Sun bear Helarctos malayanus Primates Macaque Macaca sp. Langur Semnopithecus sp. Rodents Marmot Marmota sp. Figure S1. Metabarcode region and primer positions (12S mitochondrial gene) for the potential diet species (from NCBI nucleotide database). Figure S2. Schematic representation of the benchtop workflow for DNA metabarcoding. .
    [Show full text]
  • BUBALUS BUBALIS, the WATER BUFFALO 8.1 the Living Animal
    CHAPTER EIGHT BUBALUS BUBALIS, THE WATER BUFFALO 8.1 The Living Animal 8.1.1 Zoology The wild water buffalo or Asian buffalo is a large and robust bovid with a shoulder height of 1.5–1.9 m; it is the only bovid which is closely associated with water (fi g. 115). The pair of horns, borne by both sexes, is impressive and resembles a crescent moon in frontal view. The spread of the horns exceeds that of any other living bovid: they may measure up to two metres along the outer edge. The horns are heavy at the base, triangular in cross-section—not oval as in Bos—and are conspicuously marked with ridges. Seen from above, the muzzle is laterally compressed in the middle, much more than is present in other cattle. The ears are large and pendulous. The hooves are large and widely splayed as an adaptation to walk on soft and muddy substrates. The buffalo’s body is covered with moderately long, coarse and sparse hair of a black or intense dark brown colour; the lower part of the legs may be whitish. The tail ends in a bushy tip. Domestic water buffaloes are considerably smaller and less robust: whereas the wild animals have a weight between 700 and 1,200 kg, the domestic buffaloes weigh less than half, ranging between 250 and 550 kg. The domestic buffalo differs little from the wild buffalo in other respects, except for its much smaller horns and less aggressive and more docile behaviour. The horn shape varies between the domestic breeds.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Conservation Strategy for Wild Cattle and Buffaloes in South-East Asia, 2011 to 2020
    IUCN Regional Conservation Strategy for Wild Cattle and Buffaloes in South-east Asia, 2011 to 2020 Copyright: Rochmad Setyadi Citation: IUCN-SSC Asian Wild Cattle Specialist Group 2010. Regional Conservation Strategy for Wild Cattle and Buffaloes in South-east Asia. 1 Contents: 1. Summary 2. Introduction 2.1 Background 2.2 Biology and conservation needs of South-east Asian wild cattle and buffaloes 2.3 The South-east Asian regional conservation planning workshop for wild cattle and buffaloes 3. The Distribution and Status of Wild Cattle and Buffaloes in South-east Asia 3.1 Current distribution 3.2 Conclusions 4. Threats to Asian Wild Cattle and Buffalo Populations in South-east Asia 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Threats 4.3 Constraints on alleviating threats 4.4 The “problem tree” 4.5 Conclusions 5. Conservation Strategy for Wild Cattle and Buffaloes in South-east Asia 5.1 Methodology 5.2 Results of the strategic planning process 5.3 National planning approach 6. Implementation of the Regional Strategy 6.1 Review process for the Regional Strategy 6.2 Implementation of the Regional Strategy and National Action Plans References Appendix 1: List of participants at the June 2008 regional strategy workshop Appendix 2: Agenda for the June 2008 regional strategy workshop Appendix 3: Mapping methodology Appendix 4: The entire strategy in a logical framework format Appendix 5: Acknowledgements Regional Conservation Strategy for Wild Cattle and Buffaloes in South-east Asia 2 Chapter 1 Summary South-east Asia is globally important for wild cattle and buffaloes; eight of the world‟s 12 wild cattle and buffalo species are found here.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Suitability Assessment for Tiger in Trijuga Forest, East Nepal
    A final report on Habitat Suitability Assessment for Tiger in Trijuga Forest, East Nepal Submitted by Himalayan Nature Kathmandu, Nepal Submitted to WildCats Conservation Alliance C/o ZSL Zoological Society of London Regents Park London-NW1 4RY December, 2018 1 Study Team Members: 1) Prof. Karan Bahadur Shah – Biologist and Team Leader 2) Mr. Kul Bahadur Thapa – Biologist (Zoologist) 3) Mr. Hem Raj Paudel – Biologist (Botanist) 4) Mr. Hari Basnet – GIS and Data Analyst 5) Mr. Bivek Gautam – Biologist and Social Surveyor 2 Acronyms and Abbreviations AIC: Akaike Information Criteria ASCII: American Standard Code for Information Interchange CFs: Community Forests CFUGs: Community Forest User's Group CIB: Crime Investigation Bureau CITES: Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora CR: Critically Endangered DD: Data Deficient DFO: District Forest Office/Officer EN: Endangered GIS: Geographic Information System GPS: Global Positioning System GTI: Global Tiger Initiative IUCN: International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resource KTWR: Koshi Tappu Wildlife Reserve LC: Least Concern NPWC Act: National Parks and Wildlife Conservation Act NT: Near Threatened NTFPs: Non-Timber Forest Products PAs: Protected Areas Sp.: Species SSC: Species Survival Commission TAL: Terai Arc Landscape VU: Vulnerable i Acknowledgements We are grateful to WildCats Conservation Alliance (WCCA), UK for funding this project. We sincerely thank Mr. Sharad Singh-Director, Mr. Prabin Shrestha and Mr. Shashank Sharma-Project Officers and Ms. Srijana Maharjan-Account Officer of Himalayan Nature for their coordination and cooperation during the project period. Thanks are due to Nepal Government's Department of Forest, Babarmahal for providing the research permission; Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation, Babarmahal, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Call to Conserve the Wild Water Buffalo (Bubalus Arnee) in Nepal
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSERVATION SCIENCE ISSN: 2067-533X Volume 2, Issue 4, October-December 2011: 261-268 www.ijcs.uaic.ro CALL TO CONSERVE THE WILD WATER BUFFALO (BUBALUS ARNEE) IN NEPAL Achyut ARYAL1*, Tej Kumar SHRESTHA2, Ashok RAM3, Wolfgang FREY2, Colin GROVES4, Helmut HEMMER5, Maheshwar DHAKAL6, Raj Kumar KOIRALA7, Joel HEINEN8, David RAUBENHEIMER9 1) Ecology and Conservation Group, Institute of Natural Sciences, Massey University, New Zealand / Wild Buffalo Conservation Alliance-BRTF-FFCON Nepal 2) Wild Buffalo Conservation Alliance, Nepal 3) Koshi Tappu Wildlife Reserve, Nepal 4) Australian National University, Australia 5) Institute of Zoology, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany 6) Department of National Park and Wildlife Conservation, Government of Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal 7) Nutritional Ecology Research Group, Institute of Natural Sciences, Massey University, New Zealand / Institute of Forestry, Tribhuvan University, Pokhara, Nepal 8) Department of Earth and Environment, Florida International University, USA 9) Nutritional Ecology Research Group, Institute of Natural Sciences, Massey University, New Zealand Abstract Wild water buffaloes (Bubalus arnee) are categorized as endangered on the IUCN Red List. With a global population of less than 4,000, the species has a very limited distribution spanning over less than 20,000 km² in Nepal, India, Sri Lanka, Cambodia, Myanmar, Thailand and Bhutan. In Nepal, Koshi Tappu Wildlife Reserve was designated for wild Asian buffalo; this reserve contains approximately 219 individuals, although there is no precise information on the number of pure-bred wild buffalo. The conservation of wild buffalo is of global concern; there are numerous threats due to habitat fragmentation, as well as competition, hybridization, habitat overlap, disease and parasites transmitted by domestic livestock.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Buffalo
    Invasive animal risk assessment Biosecurity Queensland Agriculture Fisheries and Department of Water buffalo BabBubalus bubalis Pest animal risk assessment Peter Jesser, Anna Markula and Steve Csurhes First published 2008 Updated 2016 © State of Queensland, 2016. The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia (CC BY) licence. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. Note: Some content in this publication may have different licence terms as indicated. For more information on this licence visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/3.0/au/deed.en" http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en Invasive animal risk assessment: Water buffalo Bubalus bubalis 2 Contents Identity and taxonomy 4 Description 4 Biology 5 Social organisation 6 Diet 6 Preferred habitat 6 Predators and diseases 7 History of introduction 7 Distribution and abundance in Australia 8 Overseas distribution 9 Management 10 Current and potential impacts in Australia 10 Current and potential benefits of water buffalo in Australia 11 Impact overseas 12 Legislative status in Australia 12 Potential distribution 13 References 14 Invasive animal risk assessment: Water buffalo Bubalus bubalis 3 Identity and taxonomy Species: Bubalus bubalis Common names: Asian water buffalo, Asian buffalo, Asiatic buffalo, water buffalo Family: Bovidae Related species (from Huffman 2005): Bison Bison bison (American bison), B. bonasus (European bison, wisent) Bos Bos frontalis (gaur), B. grunniens (yak), B. javanicus (banteng), B. sauveli (kouprey), B. taurus (domestic cattle) Boselaphus Boselaphus tragocamelus (nilgai) Bubalus Bubalus depressicornis (lowland anoa), B.
    [Show full text]