Robotic Exploration of the Solar System – from Mercury to Pluto
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Mission to Jupiter
This book attempts to convey the creativity, Project A History of the Galileo Jupiter: To Mission The Galileo mission to Jupiter explored leadership, and vision that were necessary for the an exciting new frontier, had a major impact mission’s success. It is a book about dedicated people on planetary science, and provided invaluable and their scientific and engineering achievements. lessons for the design of spacecraft. This The Galileo mission faced many significant problems. mission amassed so many scientific firsts and Some of the most brilliant accomplishments and key discoveries that it can truly be called one of “work-arounds” of the Galileo staff occurred the most impressive feats of exploration of the precisely when these challenges arose. Throughout 20th century. In the words of John Casani, the the mission, engineers and scientists found ways to original project manager of the mission, “Galileo keep the spacecraft operational from a distance of was a way of demonstrating . just what U.S. nearly half a billion miles, enabling one of the most technology was capable of doing.” An engineer impressive voyages of scientific discovery. on the Galileo team expressed more personal * * * * * sentiments when she said, “I had never been a Michael Meltzer is an environmental part of something with such great scope . To scientist who has been writing about science know that the whole world was watching and and technology for nearly 30 years. His books hoping with us that this would work. We were and articles have investigated topics that include doing something for all mankind.” designing solar houses, preventing pollution in When Galileo lifted off from Kennedy electroplating shops, catching salmon with sonar and Space Center on 18 October 1989, it began an radar, and developing a sensor for examining Space interplanetary voyage that took it to Venus, to Michael Meltzer Michael Shuttle engines. -
JUICE Red Book
ESA/SRE(2014)1 September 2014 JUICE JUpiter ICy moons Explorer Exploring the emergence of habitable worlds around gas giants Definition Study Report European Space Agency 1 This page left intentionally blank 2 Mission Description Jupiter Icy Moons Explorer Key science goals The emergence of habitable worlds around gas giants Characterise Ganymede, Europa and Callisto as planetary objects and potential habitats Explore the Jupiter system as an archetype for gas giants Payload Ten instruments Laser Altimeter Radio Science Experiment Ice Penetrating Radar Visible-Infrared Hyperspectral Imaging Spectrometer Ultraviolet Imaging Spectrograph Imaging System Magnetometer Particle Package Submillimetre Wave Instrument Radio and Plasma Wave Instrument Overall mission profile 06/2022 - Launch by Ariane-5 ECA + EVEE Cruise 01/2030 - Jupiter orbit insertion Jupiter tour Transfer to Callisto (11 months) Europa phase: 2 Europa and 3 Callisto flybys (1 month) Jupiter High Latitude Phase: 9 Callisto flybys (9 months) Transfer to Ganymede (11 months) 09/2032 – Ganymede orbit insertion Ganymede tour Elliptical and high altitude circular phases (5 months) Low altitude (500 km) circular orbit (4 months) 06/2033 – End of nominal mission Spacecraft 3-axis stabilised Power: solar panels: ~900 W HGA: ~3 m, body fixed X and Ka bands Downlink ≥ 1.4 Gbit/day High Δv capability (2700 m/s) Radiation tolerance: 50 krad at equipment level Dry mass: ~1800 kg Ground TM stations ESTRAC network Key mission drivers Radiation tolerance and technology Power budget and solar arrays challenges Mass budget Responsibilities ESA: manufacturing, launch, operations of the spacecraft and data archiving PI Teams: science payload provision, operations, and data analysis 3 Foreword The JUICE (JUpiter ICy moon Explorer) mission, selected by ESA in May 2012 to be the first large mission within the Cosmic Vision Program 2015–2025, will provide the most comprehensive exploration to date of the Jovian system in all its complexity, with particular emphasis on Ganymede as a planetary body and potential habitat. -
Infrared Experiments for Spaceborne Planetary Atmospheres Research Full Report
NASA Technical Memorandum 84414 Infrared Experiments for Spaceborne Planetary Atmospheres Research Full Report Infrared Experiments Working Group NOVEMBER 1981 NASA NASA Technical Memorandum 84414 Infrared Experiments for Spaceborne Planetary Atmospheres Research Full Report Infrared Experiments Working Group Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, California NASA National Aeronautics and Space Administration Scientific and Technical Information Branch 1981 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface Summary of Principal Conclusions and Recommendations Chapter I The Role of Infrared Sensing in Atmospheric Science Chapter II Review of Existing Infrared Measurement Techniques Chapter III Critical Comparison of Proposed Measurement Techniques Chapter IV Conclusions and Recommended Instrument Developments Appendices: A Critical Technologies B Applicability of Atmospheric Infrared Instrumentation to Surface Science C Supporting Studies in Data Analysis and Numerical Modeling D Description of Planned Earth Orbital Platforms ii PREFACE Experiments conducted in the infrared spectral region provide a powerful tool for the study of the composition, structure and dynamics of planetary atmospheres. However, the field has become highly complex, especially that part associated with spacecraft sensing, and the range of technologies used so diverse that it is difficult to determine which of the available methods for making a particular measurement is to be preferred, even for those deeply involved in the field. Unfortunately, the realities of the age demand that some selectivity be employed; not all approaches can be supported. Furthermore, the chosen methods are generally sufficiently untried that long pre-flight developments are neces- sary if viable proposals are to be written for future flight opportunities. These considerations clearly lead to a program of developments which must be coordinated on a national scale. -
3.1 Discipline Science Results
CASSINI FINAL MISSION REPORT 2019 1 SATURN Before Cassini, scientists viewed Saturn’s unique features only from Earth and from a few spacecraft flybys. During more than a decade orbiting the gas giant, Cassini studied the composition and temperature of Saturn’s upper atmosphere as the seasons changed there. Cassini also provided up-close observations of Saturn’s exotic storms and jet streams, and heard Saturn’s lightning, which cannot be detected from Earth. The Grand Finale orbits provided valuable data for understanding Saturn’s interior structure and magnetic dynamo, in addition to providing insight into material falling into the atmosphere from parts of the rings. Cassini’s Saturn science objectives were overseen by the Saturn Working Group (SWG). This group consisted of the scientists on the mission interested in studying the planet itself and phenomena which influenced it. The Saturn Atmospheric Modeling Working Group (SAMWG) was formed to specifically characterize Saturn’s uppermost atmosphere (thermosphere) and its variation with time, define the shape of Saturn’s 100 mbar and 1 bar pressure levels, and determine when the Saturn safely eclipsed Cassini from the Sun. Its membership consisted of experts in studying Saturn’s upper atmosphere and members of the engineering team. 2 VOLUME 1: MISSION OVERVIEW & SCIENCE OBJECTIVES AND RESULTS CONTENTS SATURN ........................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Executive -
Mariner to Mercury, Venus and Mars
NASA Facts National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA 91109 Mariner to Mercury, Venus and Mars Between 1962 and late 1973, NASA’s Jet carry a host of scientific instruments. Some of the Propulsion Laboratory designed and built 10 space- instruments, such as cameras, would need to be point- craft named Mariner to explore the inner solar system ed at the target body it was studying. Other instru- -- visiting the planets Venus, Mars and Mercury for ments were non-directional and studied phenomena the first time, and returning to Venus and Mars for such as magnetic fields and charged particles. JPL additional close observations. The final mission in the engineers proposed to make the Mariners “three-axis- series, Mariner 10, flew past Venus before going on to stabilized,” meaning that unlike other space probes encounter Mercury, after which it returned to Mercury they would not spin. for a total of three flybys. The next-to-last, Mariner Each of the Mariner projects was designed to have 9, became the first ever to orbit another planet when two spacecraft launched on separate rockets, in case it rached Mars for about a year of mapping and mea- of difficulties with the nearly untried launch vehicles. surement. Mariner 1, Mariner 3, and Mariner 8 were in fact lost The Mariners were all relatively small robotic during launch, but their backups were successful. No explorers, each launched on an Atlas rocket with Mariners were lost in later flight to their destination either an Agena or Centaur upper-stage booster, and planets or before completing their scientific missions. -
Mission Juno: Extended & Expanded 29 11 42
“Since its first orbit in 2016, Juno has delivered one revelation after another about the inner workings of this massive gas giant. With the extended mission, we will answer fundamental questions that arose during Juno’s prime mission while reaching beyond the planet to explore Mission Juno: Extended & Expanded Jupiter’s ring system and largest satellites.” by the numbers —SwRI’s Scott Bolton, Juno principal investigator “The Juno team will start tackling a breadth of science historically required of flagships. This represents an efficient and innovative advance for NASA’s solar system exploration strategy.” — Lori Glaze, Planetary Science Division Director, NASA HQ primary mission Investigate Jupiter’s origins, interior, atmosphere extended mission and magnetosphere Investigation of Jupiter’s northern hemisphere and polar cyclones, dilute core, magnetic LAUNCH: August 5, 2011 ARRIVAL: July 2016 features being sheared by Jupiter’s zonal jets; flybys of Io, Europa and Ganymede; observation PRIMARY MISSION ENDS: July 2021 of the distant boundaries of the magnetosphere; and the first exploration of Jupiter’s rings MISSION STARTS: August 2021 MISSION ENDS: September 2025 34 Science Orbits 42 Additional Orbits Flybys over the Great Blue 6 Spot, a Magnetic Enigma SPACECRAFT ST Detailed Exploration of 19 Atmospheric 1 Jupiter’s Faint Rings Occultations ST Spacecraft Equipped 1 with a Radiation Vault MOON FLYBYS Titanium Mapping of 400 ST POUND Electronics Vault 1 Europa’s Ice Shell Thickness 3 EUROPA FLYBYS 29 Science Sensors on 11 Instruments Measurement ST of Space Search for 1 GANYMEDE FLYBYS ST Weathering 2 IO FLYBYS 1 Io’s Global on an Icy Solar Panels Spanning 66 11 Magma Ocean 3 FEET Moon 18 SPRING 2021 IMAGES COURTESY NASA/JPL/DLR/JPL-CALTECH D024769. -
In Situ Observations of Cometary Nuclei 211
Keller et al.: In Situ Observations of Cometary Nuclei 211 In Situ Observations of Cometary Nuclei H. U. Keller Max-Planck-Institut für Aeronomie D. Britt University of Central Florida B. J. Buratti Jet Propulsion Laboratory N. Thomas Max-Planck-Institut für Aeronomie (now at University of Bern) It is only through close spacecraft encounters that cometary nuclei can be resolved and their properties determined with complete confidence. At the time of writing, only two nuclei (those of Comets 1P/Halley and 19P/Borrelly) have been observed, both by rapid flyby missions. The camera systems onboard these missions have revealed single, solid, dark, lumpy, and elongated nuclei. The infrared systems gave surface temperatures well above the free sublimation tempera- ture of water ice and close to blackbody temperatures. The observed nuclei were much more similar than they were different. In both cases, significant topography was evident, possibly reflecting the objects’ sublimation histories. Dust emission was restricted to active regions and jets in the inner comae were prevalent. Active regions may have been slightly brighter than inert areas but the reflectance was still very low. No activity from the nightside was found. In this chapter, the observations are presented and comparisons are made between Comets Halley and Borrelly. A paradigm for the structure of cometary nuclei is also described that implies that the nonvolatile component defines the characteristics of nuclei and that high porosity, large- scale inhomogeneity, and moderate tensile strength are common features. 1. INTRODUCTION It is important to emphasize that prior to the spacecraft encounters with Comet 1P/Halley in 1986, the existence of The nuclei of most comets are too small to be resolved a nucleus was merely inferred from coarse observations. -
Abstract Book
\ Abstract Book 50th ESLAB Symposium: “From Giotto to Rosetta” 14 – 18 March 2016 Leiden, The Netherlands 2 Table of Contents Programme .................................................................................................................................................. 4 Monday 14 March 2016 ............................................................................................................................ 5 Tuesday 15 March 2016 ............................................................................................................................ 7 Wednesday 16 March 2016 ...................................................................................................................... 9 Thursday 17 March 2016 ........................................................................................................................ 11 Friday 18 March 2016 ............................................................................................................................. 13 Poster Sessions........................................................................................................................................ 14 Abstracts .................................................................................................................................................... 23 Oral Presentations ............................................................................................................................... 23 Posters .................................................................................................................................................. -
Complete List of Contents
Complete List of Contents Volume 1 Cape Canaveral and the Kennedy Space Center ......213 Publisher’s Note ......................................................... vii Chandra X-Ray Observatory ....................................223 Introduction ................................................................. ix Clementine Mission to the Moon .............................229 Preface to the Third Edition ..................................... xiii Commercial Crewed vehicles ..................................235 Contributors ............................................................. xvii Compton Gamma Ray Observatory .........................240 List of Abbreviations ................................................. xxi Cooperation in Space: U.S. and Russian .................247 Complete List of Contents .................................... xxxiii Dawn Mission ..........................................................254 Deep Impact .............................................................259 Air Traffic Control Satellites ........................................1 Deep Space Network ................................................264 Amateur Radio Satellites .............................................6 Delta Launch Vehicles .............................................271 Ames Research Center ...............................................12 Dynamics Explorers .................................................279 Ansari X Prize ............................................................19 Early-Warning Satellites ..........................................284 -
Jupiter Magnetospheric Orbiter Trajectory Design: Reaching High Inclination in the Jovian System
Jupiter Magnetospheric Orbiter trajectory design: reaching high inclination in the Jovian system Stefano Campagnola (1), Yasuhiro Kawakatsu (2) (1)JSPS postdocrotal fellow, JAXA/ISAS, Kanagawa-ken, Sagamihara-shi, Chuo-ku, Yoshinodai 3-1-1, 252-5210, Japan, +81-50-336-23664, [email protected] (2)Associate professor, JAXA, [email protected] Abstract This paper presents the trajectory design for the Jupiter Magnetospheric Orbiter (JMO) in the Jovian system. JMO is JAXA’s contribution to the Europa Jupiter System Mission, and its science objectives include in-situ exploration of different regions of the magnetosphere and the remote sensing of the plasma torus from high latitudes. For this reason the spacecraft is initially captured into low-inclination, high-apojove orbits, and gradually increases the inclination and reduces the apojove using gravity assists. In order to minimize the mission cost and complexity, JMO avoids the high- radiation regions. At the same time, the trajectory minimizes the transfer time and the propellant mass, and maximize the final inclination to the Jupiter equator. This work analyzes the solution space of this complex multi-objective optimization problem and discusses the trade-offs by comparing two representative solutions on its Pareto front. The design approach is also presented. Keywords: Jupiter Magnetospheric Orbiter, Jovian system, multiple gravity assists,orbit plane change 1 Introduction In the last years the scientific community has become increasingly interested in the Jovian system. The scientific return from a mission devoted to the exploration of Jupiter and its environment would be enormous, addressing fundamental questions on the plasma science, and on the presence of water - and possibly life - below the surface of the moons Europa and Ganymede. -
Galileo in 1610
Module 3 – Nautical Science Unit 4 – Astronomy Chapter 15 - The Planets Section 2 – Mars & Jupiter What You Will Learn to Do Demonstrate understanding of astronomy and how it pertains to our solar system and its related bodies: Moon, Sun, stars and planets Objectives 1. Describe the major features of Mars 2. Identify the principal characteristics of Jupiter Key Terms CPS Key Term Questions 1 - 5 Key Terms Nix Olympica - Snow of Olympus Galilean satellites - The four largest and brightest moons of Jupiter: Io, Europa, Ganymede and Callisto; discovered by Galileo in 1610 Prograde The counter-clockwise direction of motion - celestial bodies around the Sun as seen from above the north pole of the Sun; in the sky it is from west to east Key Terms Retrograde The clockwise direction of celestial motion - bodies around the Sun; in the sky it is from east to west Rotational axis - The straight line through all fixed points of a rotating rigid body around which all other points of the body move in circles Opening Question Discuss what types of exploration missions have occurred on Mars. (Use CPS “Pick a Student” for this question.) Mars Fourth from Mars the Sun and the next planet beyond Earth, Mars has aroused the greatest interest. Mars Mars Ares (Roman Mars) Mars Named for the Roman god of war, it is often called the “red planet.” Mars Mars’ red color and its rapid movement from west to east among the stars make it stand out in the sky. Mars Earth The best time to see Mars is when it is nearest to Earth in August and September, when the Earth is Sun between the Sun and Mars. -
The Future Exploration of Saturn 417-441, in Saturn in the 21St Century (Eds. KH Baines, FM Flasar, N Krupp, T Stallard)
The Future Exploration of Saturn By Kevin H. Baines, Sushil K. Atreya, Frank Crary, Scott G. Edgington, Thomas K. Greathouse, Henrik Melin, Olivier Mousis, Glenn S. Orton, Thomas R. Spilker, Anthony Wesley (2019). pp 417-441, in Saturn in the 21st Century (eds. KH Baines, FM Flasar, N Krupp, T Stallard), Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316227220.014 14 The Future Exploration of Saturn KEVIN H. BAINES, SUSHIL K. ATREYA, FRANK CRARY, SCOTT G. EDGINGTON, THOMAS K. GREATHOUSE, HENRIK MELIN, OLIVIER MOUSIS, GLENN S. ORTON, THOMAS R. SPILKER AND ANTHONY WESLEY Abstract missions, achieving a remarkable record of discoveries Despite the lack of another Flagship-class mission about the entire Saturn system, including its icy satel- such as Cassini–Huygens, prospects for the future lites, the large atmosphere-enshrouded moon Titan, the ’ exploration of Saturn are nevertheless encoura- planet s surprisingly intricate ring system and the pla- ’ ging. Both NASA and the European Space net s complex magnetosphere, atmosphere and interior. Agency (ESA) are exploring the possibilities of Far from being a small (500 km diameter) geologically focused interplanetary missions (1) to drop one or dead moon, Enceladus proved to be exceptionally more in situ atmospheric entry probes into Saturn active, erupting with numerous geysers that spew – and (2) to explore the satellites Titan and liquid water vapor and ice grains into space some of fi Enceladus, which would provide opportunities for which falls back to form nearly pure white snow elds both in situ investigations of Saturn’s magneto- and some of which escapes to form a distinctive ring sphere and detailed remote-sensing observations around Saturn (e.g.