DOCSLIB.ORG

The National Plant Biosecurity Status Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The National Plant Biosecurity Status Report The National Plant Biosecurity Status Report 2014 © Plant Health Australia 2015 Disclaimer: This publication is published by Plant Health Australia for information purposes only. Information in the document is drawn from a variety of sources outside This work is copyright. Apart from any use as Plant Health Australia. Although reasonable care was taken in its preparation, Plant Health permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part Australia does not warrant the accuracy, reliability, completeness or currency of the may be reproduced by any process without prior information, or its usefulness in achieving any purpose. permission from Plant Health Australia. Given that there are continuous changes in trade patterns, pest distributions, control Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction measures and agricultural practices, this report can only provide a snapshot in time. and rights should be addressed to: Therefore, all information contained in this report has been collected for the 12 month period from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2014, and should be validated and Communications Manager confirmed with the relevant organisations/authorities before being used. A list of Plant Health Australia contact details (including websites) is provided in the Appendices. 1/1 Phipps Close DEAKIN ACT 2600 To the fullest extent permitted by law, Plant Health Australia will not be liable for any loss, damage, cost or expense incurred in or arising by reason of any person relying on the ISSN 1838-8116 information in this publication. Readers should make and rely on their own assessment An electronic version of this report is available for and enquiries to verify the accuracy of the information provided. download from the Plant Health Australia website. Print copies can be ordered by contacting Plant Health Australia. In referencing this document, the preferred citation is: National Plant Biosecurity Status Report (2014). Plant Health Australia, Canberra, ACT. Contents OVERVIEW 7 CHAPTER 1 THE PLANT BIOSECURITY SYSTEM IN AUSTRALIA 11 1.1 Plant biosecurity policy and legislation 12 Intergovernmental Agreement on Biosecurity 13 National Plant Biosecurity Strategy 14 Biosecurity legislation 14 1.2 National committees 16 National Biosecurity Committee 16 Plant Health Committee 16 1.3 Australian Government plant health services 18 Department of Agriculture 18 Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade 20 Department of Environment 20 Department of Immigration and Border Protection 20 Other government organisations 20 1.4 State and territory plant biosecurity services 21 Australian Capital Territory 22 New South Wales 22 Northern Territory 22 Queensland 23 South Australia 23 Tasmania 23 Victoria 24 Western Australia 24 1.5 Private sector plant biosecurity services 26 Private consultants and commercial agronomists 26 Professional associations 26 Australian aerial agriculture operators 26 1.6 Plant Health Australia 27 1.7 Australia’s plant production industries 30 Industry representative bodies and growers 30 Crop production summary 30 CHAPTER 2 THREATS TO AUSTRALIA’S PLANT PRODUCTION 87 2.1 Australia’s High Priority Pests 89 2.2 Australia’s regionalised pests 98 2.3 Responses to Emergency Plant Pests 102 2.4 Managing weed threats in Australia 105 Image courtesy of Canned Fruit Industry Council of Australia CHAPTER 3 MAINTAINING AUSTRALIA’S PLANT BIOSECURITY STATUS 109 3.1 Biosecurity and international trade 110 International agreements 111 Imports 114 Exports 116 3.2 Pre-border activities 120 Risk assessments 120 Verifications, inspections and audits 120 International plant health 121 Building capacity in the Asia-Pacific egionr 121 Intelligence 121 3.3 Activities at the border 122 Screening and inspection 122 Post-entry plant quarantine 122 Northern Australia Quarantine Strategy 123 3.4 Post-border activities 125 Domestic quarantine 126 Pre-emptive biosecurity planning 127 National management of fruit flies 127 Pest management 128 Pre-emptive breeding 130 Surveillance 130 Diagnostics 140 Forest health 151 On-farm biosecurity 152 Plant biosecurity communication 153 CHAPTER 4 RESPONDING TO PLANT PEST INCURSIONS 155 4.1 The Emergency Plant Pest Response Deed 156 National Management Group 157 Consultative Committee on Emergency Plant Pests 157 Categorisation group 157 4.2 PLANTPLAN 159 Contingency planning 159 Training 164 CHAPTER 5 RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND EXTENSION 167 5.1 National Plant Biosecurity RD&E Strategy 169 5.2 Australian Government RD&E 170 Australian Government agencies and statutory authorities 170 Cooperative Research Centres 170 Research and Development Corporations 172 5.3 State and territory government RD&E 175 5.4 University and private research institution RD&E 175 5.5 Plant biosecurity RD&E in 2014 176 APPENDICES 197 INDEX 207 Image courtesy of Elaine Tou Tables and figures Case Studies TABLES Chapter 1 Unmanned helicopters used to combat weeds 21 Table 1. Plant biosecurity related legislation 14 New tool makes biosecurity second nature 25 Table 2. Plant Health Australia’s members 28 WA mobile app to identify and report grain pests 51 Tables 3-34. Industry specific High Priority Pest lists 32-85 Chapter 2 Banana freckle sparks huge eradication response 97 Table 35. High Priority Pests designated during biosecurity planning 90 Table 36. Australia’s regionalised pests 99 Chapter 3 Blowing in the wind – long distance natural dispersal of pests 120 Table 37. Emergency responses to plant pests under EPPRD arrangements 103 Reducing plant quarantine times 124 Table 38. Pest detections notified under EPPRD arrangements that did International workshop on spray drift assessment 129 not result in a formal Cost-Shared emergency response 104 Harnessing the power of honey bees for crop pollination 137 Table 39. Department of Agriculture finalised and draft import policy advice 114 Award winner withstands disease threat to bananas 153 Table 40. Market access achievements for plant products since 2000 117 Table 41. Australian post-entry plant quarantine facilities 122 Chapter 4. Ginger industry signs the EPPRD, bringing the total number of Table 42. Current industry biosecurity plans covering Australia’s plant industries 127 industry Parties to 30 158 Table 43. Australia’s plant biosecurity surveillance programs 131 Emergency response changes in 2014 159 Table 44. Samples examined for pests of bees, by state and territory, 2014 139 Chapter 5. Diagnosing a serious plant pest 171 Table 45. Samples examined for pests of bees and pest bees, by agent, 2014 139 Table 46. Australia’s diagnostic services, their capabilities and accreditations 141 Table 47. National Diagnostic Protocols 148 Table 48. Biosecurity manuals for producers of various industries 152 Table 49. Description of the EPP categories and the associated Affected Party Cost Sharing splits 157 Table 50. Contingency plans 160 Table 51. Plant biosecurity research projects 178 FIGURES Figure 1. Value of plant and animal production industries in Australia 9 Figure 2. National biosecurity committees and working groups with plant focus 17 Figure 3. Department of Agriculture regional boundaries for biosecurity operations 19 Figure 4. Comparative value of Australia’s plant production industries 30 Figures 5-72. Industry production data 84 Figure 73. Key components of Australia’s plant biosecurity continuum 110 Figure 74. NAQS surveillance area 123 Figure 75. Quarantine zones in the Torres Strait 123 Figure 76. Surveillance programs by target host 137 Figure 77. Surveillance programs by target pest type 137 Figure 78. National Diagnostic Protocol endorsement process 146 Figures 79-82. RD&E project summaries 176-177 Image courtesy of PBCRC Image courtesy of PBCRC Foreword This 7th edition of the National Plant Biosecurity Status Report provides a synopsis of the No one knows where Australia’s next plant biosecurity challenge will come from, but it is plant biosecurity system in Australia in 2014. reassuring to know that whatever it is, there is an extensive system set to minimise any impacts. In a constantly changing environment this is exactly what is required to protect the Chapter 1 presents the architecture of the system, introducing all the major players and economy, livelihoods, communities and the environment. showing how industry and government stakeholders work together to protect our plant industries and unique natural environment. PHA thanks all of the contributors to this volume. It wouldn’t be possible to compile without your cooperation. Pests of significance are detailed in Chapter 2, including exotic pests that have been identified as posing the largest risk to Australia, the pests that are currently being contained to regions of the country and those that prompted some response activity under the terms of the Emergency Plant Pest Response Deed. Chapter 3 charts the myriad activities that are carried out all over Australia, as well as at the border and pre-border, to combat plant pests. Activities range from complying with Dr Tony Gregson AM, FTSE international phytosanitary agreements, carrying out import risk analyses on proposed imports, the efforts of the Northern Australia Quarantine Strategy to keep pests of the tropics from entering to pest surveillance activities and on-farm biosecurity. Australia’s emergency plant pest response system is described in Chapter 4, along with a list of contingency plans that set out how particular pests would be dealt with in the event of an incursion. The report concludes with Chapter 5, which provides updated data on all the plant biosecurity
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Addenda and Amendments to a Checklist of the Lepidoptera of the British Isles on Account of Subsequently Published Data
    Ent Rec 128(2)_Layout 1 22/03/2016 12:53 Page 98 94 Entomologist’s Rec. J. Var. 128 (2016) ADDENDA AND AMENDMENTS TO A CHECKLIST OF THE LEPIDOPTERA OF THE BRITISH ISLES ON ACCOUNT OF SUBSEQUENTLY PUBLISHED DATA 1 DAVID J. L. A GASSIZ , 2 S. D. B EAVAN & 1 R. J. H ECKFORD 1 Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD 2 The Hayes, Zeal Monachorum, Devon EX17 6DF This update incorpotes information published before 25 March 2016 into A Checklist of the Lepidoptera of the British Isles, 2013. CENSUS The number of species now recorded from the British Isles stands at 2535 of which 57 are thought to be extinct and in addition there are 177 adventive species. CHANGE OF STATUS (no longer extinct) p. 17 16.013 remove X, Hall (2013) p. 25 35.006 remove X, Beavan & Heckford (2014) p. 40 45.024 remove X, Wilton (2014) p. 54 49.340 remove X, Manning (2015) ADDITIONAL SPECIES in main list 12.0047 Infurcitinea teriolella (Amsel, 1954) E S W I C 15.0321 Parornix atripalpella Wahlström, 1979 E S W I C 15.0861 Phyllonorycter apparella (Herrich-Schäffer, 1855) E S W I C 15.0862 Phyllonorycter pastorella (Zeller, 1846) E S W I C 27.0021 Oegoconia novimundi (Busck, 1915) E S W I C 35.0299 Helcystogramma triannulella (Herrich-Sch äffer, 1854) E S W I C 41.0041 Blastobasis maroccanella Amsel, 1952 E S W I C 48.0071 Choreutis nemorana (Hübner, 1799) E S W I C 49.0371 Clepsis dumicolana (Zeller, 1847) E S W I C 49.2001 TETRAMOERA Diakonoff, [1968] langmaidi Plant, 2014 E S W I C 62.0151 Delplanqueia inscriptella (Duponchel, 1836) E S W I C 72.0061 Hypena lividalis (Hübner, 1790) Chevron Snout E S W I C 70.2841 PUNGELARIA Rougemont, 1903 capreolaria ([Denis & Schiffermüller], 1775) Banded Pine Carpet E S W I C 72.0211 HYPHANTRIA Harris, 1841 cunea (Drury, 1773) Autumn Webworm E S W I C 73.0041 Thysanoplusia daubei (Boisduval, 1840) Boathouse Gem E S W I C 73.0301 Aedia funesta (Esper, 1786) Druid E S W I C Ent Rec 128(2)_Layout 1 22/03/2016 12:53 Page 99 Entomologist’s Rec.
    [Show full text]
  • The Microlepidopterous Fauna of Sri Lanka, Formerly Ceylon, Is Famous
    ON A COLLECTION OF SOME FAMILIES OF MICRO- LEPIDOPTERA FROM SRI LANKA (CEYLON) by A. DIAKONOFF Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie, Leiden With 65 text-figures and 18 plates CONTENTS Preface 3 Cochylidae 5 Tortricidae, Olethreutinae, Grapholitini 8 „ „ Eucosmini 23 „ „ Olethreutini 66 „ Chlidanotinae, Chlidanotini 78 „ „ Polyorthini 79 „ „ Hilarographini 81 „ „ Phricanthini 81 „ Tortricinae, Tortricini 83 „ „ Archipini 95 Brachodidae 98 Choreutidae 102 Carposinidae 103 Glyphipterigidae 108 A list of identified species no A list of collecting localities 114 Index of insect names 117 Index of latin plant names 122 PREFACE The microlepidopterous fauna of Sri Lanka, formerly Ceylon, is famous for its richness and variety, due, without doubt, to the diversified biotopes and landscapes of this beautiful island. In spite of this, there does not exist a survey of its fauna — except a single contribution, by Lord Walsingham, in Moore's "Lepidoptera of Ceylon", already almost a hundred years old, and a number of small papers and stray descriptions of new species, in various journals. The authors of these papers were Walker, Zeller, Lord Walsingham and a few other classics — until, starting with 1905, a flood of new descriptions 4 ZOOLOGISCHE VERHANDELINGEN I93 (1982) and records from India and Ceylon appeared, all by the hand of Edward Meyrick. He was almost the single specialist of these faunas, until his death in 1938. To this great Lepidopterist we chiefly owe our knowledge of all groups of Microlepidoptera of Sri Lanka. After his death this information stopped abruptly. In the later years great changes have taken place in the tropical countries. We are now facing, alas, the disastrously quick destruction of natural bio- topes, especially by the reckless liquidation of the tropical forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Description of Sexuales of Brachycolus Cucubali (Passerini, 1863) (Hemiptera Aphididae)
    REDIA, 103, 2020: 47-53 http://dx.doi.org/10.19263/REDIA-103.20.09 ALICE CASIRAGHIa,b -VÍCTOR MORENO-GONZÁLEZ c - NICOLÁS PÉREZ HIDALGO a, d DESCRIPTION OF SEXUALES OF BRACHYCOLUS CUCUBALI (PASSERINI, 1863) (HEMIPTERA APHIDIDAE) a) Instituto de Biología Integrativa de Sistemas (I2SysBio). Centro Mixto Universidad de Valencia-CSIC (Paterna, Va- lencia). Spain. b) Agroecosystems Research Group, Biodiversity Research Institute (IRBio), Section of Botany and Mycology, Depart- ment of Evolutionary Biology, Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Biology, University of Barcelona, Avda. Diagonal 643, Barcelona, Spain. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0955-8353 c) Departamento de Biodiversidad y Gestión Ambiental, área de Zoología. Universidad de León. 24071 León Spain. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0094-1559 d) Departamento de Artrópodos, Museo de Ciencias Naturales de Barcelona, 08003, Barcelona, Spain. ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8143-3366 Corresponding Author: Alice Casiraghi; [email protected] Casiraghi A., Moreno-González V., Pérez Hidalgo, N. – Description of sexuales of Brachycolus cucubali (Passerini 1863) [Hemiptera Aphididae]. The hitherto unknown oviparous females and apterous males of Brachycolus cucubali (Passerini, 1863), living in pseudogalls on Silene vulgaris (Moench) Garcke, (1869) (Caryophyllaceae), are described based on material from the North-West of Iberian Peninsula (Province of León). Sampling and morphometric data are given for every morph. Also, field data of monitored Brachycolus cucubali colonies are reported and information of polyphenism in males is discussed. KEY WORDS: Aphids, morphology, sexual dimorphism, polyphenism INTRODUCTION 2014), or with the species of this work, Brachycolus cucu- bali (Passerini, 1863) (BLACKMAN and EASTOP, 2020).
    [Show full text]
  • A Contribution to the Aphid Fauna of Greece
    Bulletin of Insectology 60 (1): 31-38, 2007 ISSN 1721-8861 A contribution to the aphid fauna of Greece 1,5 2 1,6 3 John A. TSITSIPIS , Nikos I. KATIS , John T. MARGARITOPOULOS , Dionyssios P. LYKOURESSIS , 4 1,7 1 3 Apostolos D. AVGELIS , Ioanna GARGALIANOU , Kostas D. ZARPAS , Dionyssios Ch. PERDIKIS , 2 Aristides PAPAPANAYOTOU 1Laboratory of Entomology and Agricultural Zoology, Department of Agriculture Crop Production and Rural Environment, University of Thessaly, Nea Ionia, Magnesia, Greece 2Laboratory of Plant Pathology, Department of Agriculture, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece 3Laboratory of Agricultural Zoology and Entomology, Agricultural University of Athens, Greece 4Plant Virology Laboratory, Plant Protection Institute of Heraklion, National Agricultural Research Foundation (N.AG.RE.F.), Heraklion, Crete, Greece 5Present address: Amfikleia, Fthiotida, Greece 6Present address: Institute of Technology and Management of Agricultural Ecosystems, Center for Research and Technology, Technology Park of Thessaly, Volos, Magnesia, Greece 7Present address: Department of Biology-Biotechnology, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece Abstract In the present study a list of the aphid species recorded in Greece is provided. The list includes records before 1992, which have been published in previous papers, as well as data from an almost ten-year survey using Rothamsted suction traps and Moericke traps. The recorded aphidofauna consisted of 301 species. The family Aphididae is represented by 13 subfamilies and 120 genera (300 species), while only one genus (1 species) belongs to Phylloxeridae. The aphid fauna is dominated by the subfamily Aphidi- nae (57.1 and 68.4 % of the total number of genera and species, respectively), especially the tribe Macrosiphini, and to a lesser extent the subfamily Eriosomatinae (12.6 and 8.3 % of the total number of genera and species, respectively).
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from BOLD Or Requested from Other Authors
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Towards a global DNA barcode reference library for quarantine identifcations of lepidopteran Received: 28 November 2018 Accepted: 5 April 2019 stemborers, with an emphasis on Published: xx xx xxxx sugarcane pests Timothy R. C. Lee 1, Stacey J. Anderson2, Lucy T. T. Tran-Nguyen3, Nader Sallam4, Bruno P. Le Ru5,6, Desmond Conlong7,8, Kevin Powell 9, Andrew Ward10 & Andrew Mitchell1 Lepidopteran stemborers are among the most damaging agricultural pests worldwide, able to reduce crop yields by up to 40%. Sugarcane is the world’s most prolifc crop, and several stemborer species from the families Noctuidae, Tortricidae, Crambidae and Pyralidae attack sugarcane. Australia is currently free of the most damaging stemborers, but biosecurity eforts are hampered by the difculty in morphologically distinguishing stemborer species. Here we assess the utility of DNA barcoding in identifying stemborer pest species. We review the current state of the COI barcode sequence library for sugarcane stemborers, assembling a dataset of 1297 sequences from 64 species. Sequences were from specimens collected and identifed in this study, downloaded from BOLD or requested from other authors. We performed species delimitation analyses to assess species diversity and the efectiveness of barcoding in this group. Seven species exhibited <0.03 K2P interspecifc diversity, indicating that diagnostic barcoding will work well in most of the studied taxa. We identifed 24 instances of identifcation errors in the online database, which has hampered unambiguous stemborer identifcation using barcodes. Instances of very high within-species diversity indicate that nuclear markers (e.g. 18S, 28S) and additional morphological data (genitalia dissection of all lineages) are needed to confrm species boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Pest Insects Infesting Carrot and Other Apiaceous Crops
    FACTSHEET 01/16 Field Vegetables Dr Rosemary Collier, University of Warwick Pest insects infesting carrot and other Apiaceous crops Carrot and related Apiaceous crops such as parsnip, celeriac and celery may be infested by a relatively small number of damaging pest insect species that can reduce both quality and yield. This factsheet focuses on the pest insects infesting carrot. However, the insects described may also be pests of related crops such as parsnip, celeriac and celery. The factsheet does not cover nematodes or slugs. Figure 1. Carrot fly damage to carrot roots Action points Carrot fly • Use suction trap records to indicate when all species of pest aphid are on the wing. • Use the carrot fly forecast to indicate when adult flies of each generation are likely to emerge and when the • Monitor crops closely. application of insecticide sprays is likely to be most effective. • Use the most effective aphicide treatments available, • Check whether an insecticide spray treatment is able taking account of their effects on natural enemies and be to kill adults or larvae or both stages. To maximise the aware of potential instances of insecticide resistance. ‘knockdown’ effect of insecticide sprays that target adults, they should be applied between 4–6pm on warm days, as Cutworms this is when most female flies are in the crop. • Use pheromone traps to indicate when turnip moths are • Where possible, isolate new crops from possible sources flying and laying eggs. of infestation (older crops), ideally using a separation distance of >1km. • Use a cutworm forecast to estimate the risk of damage to susceptible crops.
    [Show full text]
  • 25 Host Plant Resistance and Insect Pest Management in Chickpea
    25 Host Plant Resistance and Insect Pest Management in Chickpea H.C. SHARMA,1 C.L.L. GOWDA,1 P.C. STEVENSON,2 T.J. RIDSDILL-SMITH,3 S.L. CLEMENT,4 G.V. RANGA RAO,1 J. ROMEIS,5 M. MILES6 AND M. EL BOUHSSINI7 1Genetics Resources Divisions, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Asia Center, Hyderabad 502324, India; 2Natural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich, Chatham, ME4 4TB, UK and Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, TW9 3AB, UK; 3CSIRO Entomology, Private Bag No 5, Wembley, WA 6913, Australia; 4USDA-ARS, 59 Johnson Hall, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-6402, USA; 5Agroscope ART Reckenholz Tänikon, Reckenholzstr, 191, 8046 Zurich, Switzerland; 6Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, 203 Tor Street, PO Box 102, Toowoomba, Queensland 4350, Australia; 7International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), Aleppo, Syria Insect Pest Problems in Chickpea Chickpea (C. arietinum L.) is the third most important legume crop in the world, after dry beans and peas (FAO, 2003). It is cultivated in 42 countries in South Asia, North and Central America, the Mediterranean region, West Asia and North and East Africa. In recent years, it has become an important crop in Australia, Canada and the USA. Nearly 60 insect species are known to feed on chickpea (Reed et al., 1987) (Table 25.1). The important insect pests damaging chickpea in different regions are: ● Wireworms: false wireworm – Gonocephalum spp.; ● Cutworm: black cutworm – A. ipsilon (Hfn.) and turnip moth – A. segetum Schiff.; ● Termite: Microtermes obesi (Holm.) and Odontotermes sp.; ● Leaf-feeding caterpillars: cabbage looper – Trichoplusia ni (Hub.), leaf caterpillar – S.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity – Economy Or Ecology? Long-Term Study of Changes in the Biodiversity of Aphids Living in Steppe-Like Grasslands in Central Europe
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENTOMOLOGYENTOMOLOGY ISSN (online): 1802-8829 Eur. J. Entomol. 114: 140–146, 2017 http://www.eje.cz doi: 10.14411/eje.2017.019 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Biodiversity – economy or ecology? Long-term study of changes in the biodiversity of aphids living in steppe-like grasslands in Central Europe BARBARA OSIADACZ 1, ROMAN HAŁAJ 2 and DAMIAN CHMURA3 1 Department of Entomology and Environmental Protection, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Dąbrowskiego St. 159, PL 60-594 Poznań, Poland; e-mail: [email protected] 2 The Upper Silesian Nature Society, Huberta St. 35, PL 40-543 Katowice, Poland; e-mail: [email protected] 3 Institute of Environmental Protection and Engineering, University of Bielsko-Biała, Willowa 2, PL 43-309 Bielsko-Biała, Poland; e-mail: [email protected] Key words. Hemiptera, Aphidoidea, bio-ecological groups, community structure, protected habitats, loss of biodiversity, human impact, NMDS methods, regional hotspots Abstract. This paper examines the changes in the species composition of aphids living in dry calcareous grasslands in Central Europe over a 25-year period. To the best of our knowledge, this is the fi rst analysis of this type in the world that takes into account both previous and current data on species richness as well as groups of aphids that are distinguishable on the basis of biological and ecological criteria such as host-alternation and feeding types, life cycle, ecological niche, symbiosis with ants and their eco- logical functional groups. Over the period of more than 25 years, there has been a signifi cant decrease in aphid α-diversity, from 171 to 105 species.
    [Show full text]
  • NDP 41 Hessian
    NDP 41 V1- National Diagnostic Protocol for Mayetiola destructor National Diagnostic Protocol Mayetiola destructor Hessian Fly NDP 41 V1 NDP 41 V1 - National Diagnostic Protocol for Mayetiola destructor © Commonwealth of Australia Ownership of intellectual property rights Unless otherwise noted, copyright (and any other intellectual property rights, if any) in this publication is owned by the Commonwealth of Australia (referred to as the Commonwealth). Creative Commons licence All material in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence, save for content supplied by third parties, logos and the Commonwealth Coat of Arms. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence is a standard form licence agreement that allows you to copy, distribute, transmit and adapt this publication provided you attribute the work. A summary of the licence terms is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en. The full licence terms are available from https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/legalcode. This publication (and any material sourced from it) should be attributed as: Subcommittee on Plant Health Diagnostics (2018). National Diagnostic Protocol for Mayetiola destructor – NDP41 V1. (Eds. Subcommittee on Plant Health Diagnostics) Authors Severtson, D, Szito, A.; Reviewers Nicholas, A, Kehoe, M. ISBN 978-0-6481143-3-8 CC BY 3.0. Cataloguing data Subcommittee on Plant Health Diagnostics (2018). National Diagnostic Protocol for Mayetiola destructor – NDP41 V1. (Eds. Subcommittee
    [Show full text]
  • Biosecurity Risk Assessment
    An Invasive Risk Assessment Framework for New Animal and Plant-based Production Industries RIRDC Publication No. 11/141 RIRDCInnovation for rural Australia An Invasive Risk Assessment Framework for New Animal and Plant-based Production Industries by Dr Robert C Keogh February 2012 RIRDC Publication No. 11/141 RIRDC Project No. PRJ-007347 © 2012 Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. All rights reserved. ISBN 978-1-74254-320-8 ISSN 1440-6845 An Invasive Risk Assessment Framework for New Animal and Plant-based Production Industries Publication No. 11/141 Project No. PRJ-007347 The information contained in this publication is intended for general use to assist public knowledge and discussion and to help improve the development of sustainable regions. You must not rely on any information contained in this publication without taking specialist advice relevant to your particular circumstances. While reasonable care has been taken in preparing this publication to ensure that information is true and correct, the Commonwealth of Australia gives no assurance as to the accuracy of any information in this publication. The Commonwealth of Australia, the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation (RIRDC), the authors or contributors expressly disclaim, to the maximum extent permitted by law, all responsibility and liability to any person, arising directly or indirectly from any act or omission, or for any consequences of any such act or omission, made in reliance on the contents of this publication, whether or not caused by any negligence on the part of the Commonwealth of Australia, RIRDC, the authors or contributors. The Commonwealth of Australia does not necessarily endorse the views in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Aphid Transmission of Potyvirus: the Largest Plant-Infecting RNA Virus Genus
    Supplementary Aphid Transmission of Potyvirus: The Largest Plant-Infecting RNA Virus Genus Kiran R. Gadhave 1,2,*,†, Saurabh Gautam 3,†, David A. Rasmussen 2 and Rajagopalbabu Srinivasan 3 1 Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA 2 Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606, USA; [email protected] 3 Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, 1109 Experiment Street, Griffin, GA 30223, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]. † Authors contributed equally. Received: 13 May 2020; Accepted: 15 July 2020; Published: date Abstract: Potyviruses are the largest group of plant infecting RNA viruses that cause significant losses in a wide range of crops across the globe. The majority of viruses in the genus Potyvirus are transmitted by aphids in a non-persistent, non-circulative manner and have been extensively studied vis-à-vis their structure, taxonomy, evolution, diagnosis, transmission and molecular interactions with hosts. This comprehensive review exclusively discusses potyviruses and their transmission by aphid vectors, specifically in the light of several virus, aphid and plant factors, and how their interplay influences potyviral binding in aphids, aphid behavior and fitness, host plant biochemistry, virus epidemics, and transmission bottlenecks. We present the heatmap of the global distribution of potyvirus species, variation in the potyviral coat protein gene, and top aphid vectors of potyviruses. Lastly, we examine how the fundamental understanding of these multi-partite interactions through multi-omics approaches is already contributing to, and can have future implications for, devising effective and sustainable management strategies against aphid- transmitted potyviruses to global agriculture.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular-Assisted Pollen Grain Analysis Reveals Spatiotemporal Origin of Long-Distance Migrants of a Noctuid Moth
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Article Molecular-Assisted Pollen Grain Analysis Reveals Spatiotemporal Origin of Long-Distance Migrants of a Noctuid Moth Hong Chang 1,2, Jianglong Guo 3, Xiaowei Fu 4, Yongqiang Liu 2, Kris A. G. Wyckhuys 2, Youming Hou 1,* and Kongming Wu 2,* ID 1 State Key Laboratory of Ecological Pest Control for Fujian and Taiwan Crops and Fujian Province Key Laboratory of Insect Ecology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China; [email protected] 2 State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China; [email protected] (Y.L.); [email protected] (K.A.G.W.) 3 College of Plant Protection, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China; [email protected] 4 Department of Plant Protection, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang 453003, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (Y.H.); [email protected] (K.W.); Tel.: +86-10-8210-5551 (K.W.) Received: 18 January 2018; Accepted: 8 February 2018; Published: 13 February 2018 Abstract: Pollen grains are regularly used as markers to determine an insect’s movement patterns or host (plant) feeding behavior, yet conventional morphology-based pollen grain analysis (or palynology) encounters a number of important limitations. In the present study, we combine conventional analytical approaches with DNA meta-barcoding to identify pollen grains attached to migrating adults of the turnip moth, Agrotis segetum (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Northeast China. More specifically, pollen grains were dislodged from 2566 A. segetum long-distance migrants captured on Beihuang Island (Bohai Sea) and identified to many (plant) species level.
    [Show full text]