DOCSLIB.ORG

Status Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Status Report The National Plant Biosecurity Status Report 2012 © Plant Health Australia 2013 Disclaimer: This publication is published by Plant Health Australia for information purposes only. Information in the document is drawn from a variety of sources outside This work is copyright. Apart from any use as Plant Health Australia. Although reasonable care was taken in its preparation, Plant Health permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part Australia does not warrant the accuracy, reliability, completeness or currency of the may be reproduced by any process without prior information, or its usefulness in achieving any purpose. permission from Plant Health Australia. Given that there are continuous changes in trade patterns, pest distributions, control Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction measures and agricultural practices, this report can only provide a snapshot in time. and rights should be addressed to: Therefore, all information contained in this report has been collected for the 12 month period from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2012, and should be validated and Communications Manager confirmed with the relevant organisations/authorities before being used. A list of Plant Health Australia contact details (including websites) is provided in the Appendices. 1/1 Phipps Close DEAKIN ACT 2600 To the fullest extent permitted by law, Plant Health Australia will not be liable for any loss, damage, cost or expense incurred in or arising by reason of any person relying on the ISSN 1838-8116 information in this publication. Readers should make and rely on their own assessment An electronic version of this report is available for and enquiries to verify the accuracy of the information provided. download from the Plant Health Australia website. Print copies can be ordered by contacting Plant Health Australia. In referencing this document, the preferred citation is: National Plant Biosecurity Status Report (2012). Plant Health Australia, Canberra, ACT. Contents OVERVIEW 7 The importance of plant biosecurity 8 CHAPTER 1 ORGANISATION OF PLANT BIOSECURITY SYSTEMS IN AUSTRALIA 11 1.1 Plant health policy and legislation 12 Reforming Australia’s biosecurity system 12 Intergovernmental Agreement on Biosecurity 13 National Plant Biosecurity Strategy 14 Biosecurity legislation 14 1.2 National committees 16 Primary industries committees 16 Plant Health Committee 16 1.3 Australian Government plant health services 18 Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry 18 Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade 20 Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities 20 The Australian Customs and Border Protection Service 20 Other government organisations 20 1.4 State and territory plant biosecurity services 21 1.5 Industry and private sector plant biosecurity services 25 Industry representative bodies 25 Growers and landholders 25 Private consultants and reseller agronomists 25 Professional associations 25 1.6 Australia’s plant production industries 26 Crop production summary 26 1.7 Plant Health Australia 76 Plant Health Australia and Australia’s plant biosecurity system 76 CHAPTER 2 THREATS TO AUSTRALIA’s planT PRODUCTION 79 2.1 Australia’s High Priority Pests 81 2.2 Australia’s regionalised pests 90 2.3 Responses to Emergency Plant Pests 93 2.4 Managing weed threats in Australia 97 CHAPTER 3 MAINTAINING AUSTRALIA’s planT BIOSECURITY STATUS 101 3.1 International trade 103 International agreements 104 Imports 106 Exports 106 Image courtesy of Glynn Maynard, DAFF 3.2 Offshore activities 112 Risk assessments 112 Verifications, inspections and audits 112 International plant health 113 Asia-Pacific egionr capacity building 113 Intelligence 113 3.3 At the border activities 114 Screening and inspection 114 Post-entry plant quarantine 115 Northern Australia Quarantine Strategy 115 Education and awareness 116 3.4 Onshore activities 117 Domestic Quarantine 118 Industry biosecurity planning 118 Pre-emptive breeding 120 Surveillance 120 Diagnostics 128 Forest Health 138 On-farm biosecurity 139 Communication and awareness 140 Information technology tools and networks supporting the plant biosecurity system 140 CHAPTER 4 MANAGING PLANT BIOSECURITY EMERGENCIES 145 4.1 The Emergency Plant Pest Response Deed 146 National Management Group 147 Consultative Committee on Emergency Plant Pests 147 Categorisation Group 147 4.2 PLANTPLAN 150 Contingency planning 150 Training 154 Biosecurity Surveillance, Incident, Response and Tracing Program 155 CHAPTER 5 RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND EXTENSION 157 5.1 Research, development and extension in association with the Australian Government 158 Australian government statutory authorities and agencies involved in research and development 159 Cooperative Research Centres 160 Research and Development Corporations 163 5.2 State and territory governments research and development 166 5.3 Universities and private research institutions 166 5.4 Overview of plant biosecurity related research, development and extension in 2012 168 APPENDICES 193 Appendix 1: Organisational and initiative contact details 194 Appendix 2: Glossary 198 Appendix 3: Acronyms and abbreviations 200 INDEX 203 Image courtesy of Summerfruit Australia Tables and figures Case Studies TABLES Chapter 1 Delivering the biosecurity message to cherry growers 37 Table 1. Plant biosecurity related legislation 15 Biosecurity in the cotton industry – The “Come clean, Tables 2-30. Industry specific High Priority Pest lists 28-75 Go clean” campaign 43 Table 31. Plant Health Australia’s Members 77 Mapping stakeholders and biosecurity risks in the fodder Table 32. High Priority Pests of Australia’s plant production industries 82 and pasture industries 48 Table 33. Australia’s regionalised pests 91 Keeping a look out for biosecurity risks to honey bees Table 34. Emergency responses to plant pests under EPPRD – The National Bee Pest Surveillance Program 51 arrangements 94 Chapter 2 Taking biosecurity to students – The Scientists and Table 35. Pest detections notified under EPPRD arrangements that Mathematicians in Schools program 89 did not result in a formal cost-shared emergency response 95 Containing Bitou bush along NSW beaches 96 Table 36. Australia’s Weeds of National Significance 99 Leaf-mining jewel beetle – A biological control of Cat’s Table 37. DAFF finalised and draft import policy advice 108 claw creeper 99 Table 38. Market access acheivements for plant production industries International cooperation – Australia and East Timor 109 since 2000 110 Table 39. Post entry quarantine facilities 115 Chapter 3 Training border inspectors to spot pests 113 Table 40. List of current IBPs 118 Farm Biosecurity Program – Helping farmers to boost biosecurity 119 Table 41. Australia’s plant biosecurity surveillance programs 122 Plant Biosecurity Farmer of the Year 121 Table 42. Diagnostic services 129 Timing is essential – How a national diagnostics database helps 135 Table 43. National Diagnostic Protocols 136 Honey bee biosecurity – An exemplary model of the biosecurity Table 44. Biosecurity Manuals 139 partnership in action 142 Table 45. Contingency plans 151 Chapter 4 When pests can’t be eradicated – Transition to management Table 46. Plant biosecurity related research projects 170 programs 148 FIGURES Chapter 5 A national research strategy to coordinate plant biosecurity Figure 1. National governmental consultative committees 17 science 159 Figure 2. DAFF regional boundaries 19 The end of two CRCs – Accomplishments and legacies 162 Figure 3. Comparative value of Australia’s plant production industries 26 Figures 4-69. Industry production data 28-75 Figure 70. Key components of Australia’s plant biosecurity continuum 103 Figure 71. DAFF import risk analysis flowchart 107 Figure 72. NAQS surveillance 116 Figure 73. NAQS Torres Strait 116 Figure 74. Surveillance programs by target host 121 Figure 75. Surveillance programs by target pest 121 Figure 76. NDP endorsement process 134 Figure 77-81. R,D&E project summaries 168 Image courtesy of AUSVEG Foreword Australia has gained an international reputation as a supplier of high quality clean produce; The National Plant Biosecurity Status Report is a vital reference source for anyone a reputation that grants access to lucrative domestic and international markets for our interested in Australia’s plant biosecurity system and how it functions to maintain producers of food, fibre and forestry products. Australia’s plant pest status, which is envied around the world. This reputation has been built on Australia’s relative freedom from many plant pests that Plant Health Australia is grateful for the cooperation it receives every year in putting it trouble producers overseas, and an associated reduction in the need to use chemicals together. The National Plant Biosecurity Status Report couldn’t be compiled without to control them. contributions, input and advice from Australia’s key plant biosecurity stakeholders. A great deal of effort is put into ensuring that our good reputation, and the flow-on I am proud to recommend this publication to you. benefits, are maintained. Australia’s plant biosecurity system is second to none, an accomplishment that results from Australia’s unique partnership model for biosecurity. Under this arrangement, the traditional role of governments in managing plant biosecurity is complemented by a close association with plant production industries. National plant biosecurity priorities are determined in consultation with a wide range of industry stakeholders, who participate in policy development,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Description of Sexuales of Brachycolus Cucubali (Passerini, 1863) (Hemiptera Aphididae)
    REDIA, 103, 2020: 47-53 http://dx.doi.org/10.19263/REDIA-103.20.09 ALICE CASIRAGHIa,b -VÍCTOR MORENO-GONZÁLEZ c - NICOLÁS PÉREZ HIDALGO a, d DESCRIPTION OF SEXUALES OF BRACHYCOLUS CUCUBALI (PASSERINI, 1863) (HEMIPTERA APHIDIDAE) a) Instituto de Biología Integrativa de Sistemas (I2SysBio). Centro Mixto Universidad de Valencia-CSIC (Paterna, Va- lencia). Spain. b) Agroecosystems Research Group, Biodiversity Research Institute (IRBio), Section of Botany and Mycology, Depart- ment of Evolutionary Biology, Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Biology, University of Barcelona, Avda. Diagonal 643, Barcelona, Spain. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0955-8353 c) Departamento de Biodiversidad y Gestión Ambiental, área de Zoología. Universidad de León. 24071 León Spain. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0094-1559 d) Departamento de Artrópodos, Museo de Ciencias Naturales de Barcelona, 08003, Barcelona, Spain. ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8143-3366 Corresponding Author: Alice Casiraghi; [email protected] Casiraghi A., Moreno-González V., Pérez Hidalgo, N. – Description of sexuales of Brachycolus cucubali (Passerini 1863) [Hemiptera Aphididae]. The hitherto unknown oviparous females and apterous males of Brachycolus cucubali (Passerini, 1863), living in pseudogalls on Silene vulgaris (Moench) Garcke, (1869) (Caryophyllaceae), are described based on material from the North-West of Iberian Peninsula (Province of León). Sampling and morphometric data are given for every morph. Also, field data of monitored Brachycolus cucubali colonies are reported and information of polyphenism in males is discussed. KEY WORDS: Aphids, morphology, sexual dimorphism, polyphenism INTRODUCTION 2014), or with the species of this work, Brachycolus cucu- bali (Passerini, 1863) (BLACKMAN and EASTOP, 2020).
    [Show full text]
  • A Contribution to the Aphid Fauna of Greece
    Bulletin of Insectology 60 (1): 31-38, 2007 ISSN 1721-8861 A contribution to the aphid fauna of Greece 1,5 2 1,6 3 John A. TSITSIPIS , Nikos I. KATIS , John T. MARGARITOPOULOS , Dionyssios P. LYKOURESSIS , 4 1,7 1 3 Apostolos D. AVGELIS , Ioanna GARGALIANOU , Kostas D. ZARPAS , Dionyssios Ch. PERDIKIS , 2 Aristides PAPAPANAYOTOU 1Laboratory of Entomology and Agricultural Zoology, Department of Agriculture Crop Production and Rural Environment, University of Thessaly, Nea Ionia, Magnesia, Greece 2Laboratory of Plant Pathology, Department of Agriculture, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece 3Laboratory of Agricultural Zoology and Entomology, Agricultural University of Athens, Greece 4Plant Virology Laboratory, Plant Protection Institute of Heraklion, National Agricultural Research Foundation (N.AG.RE.F.), Heraklion, Crete, Greece 5Present address: Amfikleia, Fthiotida, Greece 6Present address: Institute of Technology and Management of Agricultural Ecosystems, Center for Research and Technology, Technology Park of Thessaly, Volos, Magnesia, Greece 7Present address: Department of Biology-Biotechnology, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece Abstract In the present study a list of the aphid species recorded in Greece is provided. The list includes records before 1992, which have been published in previous papers, as well as data from an almost ten-year survey using Rothamsted suction traps and Moericke traps. The recorded aphidofauna consisted of 301 species. The family Aphididae is represented by 13 subfamilies and 120 genera (300 species), while only one genus (1 species) belongs to Phylloxeridae. The aphid fauna is dominated by the subfamily Aphidi- nae (57.1 and 68.4 % of the total number of genera and species, respectively), especially the tribe Macrosiphini, and to a lesser extent the subfamily Eriosomatinae (12.6 and 8.3 % of the total number of genera and species, respectively).
    [Show full text]
  • The National Plant Biosecurity Status Report
    The National Plant Biosecurity Status Report 2014 © Plant Health Australia 2015 Disclaimer: This publication is published by Plant Health Australia for information purposes only. Information in the document is drawn from a variety of sources outside This work is copyright. Apart from any use as Plant Health Australia. Although reasonable care was taken in its preparation, Plant Health permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part Australia does not warrant the accuracy, reliability, completeness or currency of the may be reproduced by any process without prior information, or its usefulness in achieving any purpose. permission from Plant Health Australia. Given that there are continuous changes in trade patterns, pest distributions, control Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction measures and agricultural practices, this report can only provide a snapshot in time. and rights should be addressed to: Therefore, all information contained in this report has been collected for the 12 month period from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2014, and should be validated and Communications Manager confirmed with the relevant organisations/authorities before being used. A list of Plant Health Australia contact details (including websites) is provided in the Appendices. 1/1 Phipps Close DEAKIN ACT 2600 To the fullest extent permitted by law, Plant Health Australia will not be liable for any loss, damage, cost or expense incurred in or arising by reason of any person relying on the ISSN 1838-8116 information in this publication. Readers should make and rely on their own assessment An electronic version of this report is available for and enquiries to verify the accuracy of the information provided.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity – Economy Or Ecology? Long-Term Study of Changes in the Biodiversity of Aphids Living in Steppe-Like Grasslands in Central Europe
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENTOMOLOGYENTOMOLOGY ISSN (online): 1802-8829 Eur. J. Entomol. 114: 140–146, 2017 http://www.eje.cz doi: 10.14411/eje.2017.019 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Biodiversity – economy or ecology? Long-term study of changes in the biodiversity of aphids living in steppe-like grasslands in Central Europe BARBARA OSIADACZ 1, ROMAN HAŁAJ 2 and DAMIAN CHMURA3 1 Department of Entomology and Environmental Protection, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Dąbrowskiego St. 159, PL 60-594 Poznań, Poland; e-mail: [email protected] 2 The Upper Silesian Nature Society, Huberta St. 35, PL 40-543 Katowice, Poland; e-mail: [email protected] 3 Institute of Environmental Protection and Engineering, University of Bielsko-Biała, Willowa 2, PL 43-309 Bielsko-Biała, Poland; e-mail: [email protected] Key words. Hemiptera, Aphidoidea, bio-ecological groups, community structure, protected habitats, loss of biodiversity, human impact, NMDS methods, regional hotspots Abstract. This paper examines the changes in the species composition of aphids living in dry calcareous grasslands in Central Europe over a 25-year period. To the best of our knowledge, this is the fi rst analysis of this type in the world that takes into account both previous and current data on species richness as well as groups of aphids that are distinguishable on the basis of biological and ecological criteria such as host-alternation and feeding types, life cycle, ecological niche, symbiosis with ants and their eco- logical functional groups. Over the period of more than 25 years, there has been a signifi cant decrease in aphid α-diversity, from 171 to 105 species.
    [Show full text]
  • NDP 41 Hessian
    NDP 41 V1- National Diagnostic Protocol for Mayetiola destructor National Diagnostic Protocol Mayetiola destructor Hessian Fly NDP 41 V1 NDP 41 V1 - National Diagnostic Protocol for Mayetiola destructor © Commonwealth of Australia Ownership of intellectual property rights Unless otherwise noted, copyright (and any other intellectual property rights, if any) in this publication is owned by the Commonwealth of Australia (referred to as the Commonwealth). Creative Commons licence All material in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence, save for content supplied by third parties, logos and the Commonwealth Coat of Arms. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence is a standard form licence agreement that allows you to copy, distribute, transmit and adapt this publication provided you attribute the work. A summary of the licence terms is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en. The full licence terms are available from https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/legalcode. This publication (and any material sourced from it) should be attributed as: Subcommittee on Plant Health Diagnostics (2018). National Diagnostic Protocol for Mayetiola destructor – NDP41 V1. (Eds. Subcommittee on Plant Health Diagnostics) Authors Severtson, D, Szito, A.; Reviewers Nicholas, A, Kehoe, M. ISBN 978-0-6481143-3-8 CC BY 3.0. Cataloguing data Subcommittee on Plant Health Diagnostics (2018). National Diagnostic Protocol for Mayetiola destructor – NDP41 V1. (Eds. Subcommittee
    [Show full text]
  • Aphid Transmission of Potyvirus: the Largest Plant-Infecting RNA Virus Genus
    Supplementary Aphid Transmission of Potyvirus: The Largest Plant-Infecting RNA Virus Genus Kiran R. Gadhave 1,2,*,†, Saurabh Gautam 3,†, David A. Rasmussen 2 and Rajagopalbabu Srinivasan 3 1 Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA 2 Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606, USA; [email protected] 3 Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, 1109 Experiment Street, Griffin, GA 30223, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]. † Authors contributed equally. Received: 13 May 2020; Accepted: 15 July 2020; Published: date Abstract: Potyviruses are the largest group of plant infecting RNA viruses that cause significant losses in a wide range of crops across the globe. The majority of viruses in the genus Potyvirus are transmitted by aphids in a non-persistent, non-circulative manner and have been extensively studied vis-à-vis their structure, taxonomy, evolution, diagnosis, transmission and molecular interactions with hosts. This comprehensive review exclusively discusses potyviruses and their transmission by aphid vectors, specifically in the light of several virus, aphid and plant factors, and how their interplay influences potyviral binding in aphids, aphid behavior and fitness, host plant biochemistry, virus epidemics, and transmission bottlenecks. We present the heatmap of the global distribution of potyvirus species, variation in the potyviral coat protein gene, and top aphid vectors of potyviruses. Lastly, we examine how the fundamental understanding of these multi-partite interactions through multi-omics approaches is already contributing to, and can have future implications for, devising effective and sustainable management strategies against aphid- transmitted potyviruses to global agriculture.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Biology and Life Cycle of the Barley Stem Gall Midge and Hessian Fly (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) in Morocco
    Revue Marocaine de Protection des Plantes, 2016, N° 9: 17-37 Comparative Biology and Life Cycle of The Barley Stem Gall Midge and Hessian fly (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) in Morocco Comparaison de la Biologie et du cycle de vie de la cécidomyie à galle de l’orge et de la mouche de Hesse (Diptères: Cecidomyiidae) au Maroc 1, 2 2 1, 3 LHALOUI S. , EL BOUHSSINI M. , OTMANE R. , 1,3 1, 2, OURINICHE S. & ALAMI A. 1Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Centre Régional de Settat 2: International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas, Rabat, Morocco 3: Faculté des Sciences et Techniques, Université Hassan I, Settat, Maroc ABSTRACT The barley stem gall midge, Mayetiola hordei (Keiffer) is the most serious pest of barley in Morocco. The biology and life cycle of this insect were studied in a laboratory and under natural weather conditions. The results showed that similarly to Hessian fly, barley stem gall midge has two feeding instars and a third non-feeding instar. The generation time was longer for barley stem gall midge than for Hessian fly (45 vs 32 days at 18 ± 1°C, and a 12:12 (L: D) h photoperiod). The eggs of barley stem gall midge hatched in 7 days compared to 4 days for Hessian fly. The largest discrepancy in developmental time was for second instar and pupa. Second instars and pupae of barley stem gall midge required twice as long as those of Hessian fly to develop and molt into next stage (12 vs. 6 days). The first and third instars of barley stem gall midge also required a little bit longer to complete development (9 and 10 days vs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hemiptera-Sternorrhyncha (Insecta) of Hong Kong, China—An Annotated Inventory Citing Voucher Specimens and Published Records
    Zootaxa 2847: 1–122 (2011) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Monograph ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2011 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) ZOOTAXA 2847 The Hemiptera-Sternorrhyncha (Insecta) of Hong Kong, China—an annotated inventory citing voucher specimens and published records JON H. MARTIN1 & CLIVE S.K. LAU2 1Corresponding author, Department of Entomology, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, U.K., e-mail [email protected] 2 Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department, Cheung Sha Wan Road Government Offices, 303 Cheung Sha Wan Road, Kowloon, Hong Kong, e-mail [email protected] Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand Accepted by C. Hodgson: 17 Jan 2011; published: 29 Apr. 2011 JON H. MARTIN & CLIVE S.K. LAU The Hemiptera-Sternorrhyncha (Insecta) of Hong Kong, China—an annotated inventory citing voucher specimens and published records (Zootaxa 2847) 122 pp.; 30 cm. 29 Apr. 2011 ISBN 978-1-86977-705-0 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-86977-706-7 (Online edition) FIRST PUBLISHED IN 2011 BY Magnolia Press P.O. Box 41-383 Auckland 1346 New Zealand e-mail: [email protected] http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ © 2011 Magnolia Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, transmitted or disseminated, in any form, or by any means, without prior written permission from the publisher, to whom all requests to reproduce copyright material should be directed in writing. This authorization does not extend to any other kind of copying, by any means, in any form, and for any purpose other than private research use.
    [Show full text]
  • Arab and Near East Plant Protection Newsletter
    ARAB AND NEAR EAST PLANT PROTECTION NEWSLETTER Number 67, March 2016 Editor-in-Chief Ibrahim Al-JBOORY – Faculty of Agriculture, Baghdad University, Iraq. Editorial Board Bassam BAYAA – Faculty of Agriculture, University of Aleppo, Aleppo, Syria. Khaled MAKKOUK – National Council for Scientific Research, Beirut, Lebanon. Shoki AL-DOBAI – Food and Agriculture Organization, Cairo, Egypt. Ahmed DAWABAH – College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Ahmed EL-HENEIDY – Plant Protection Research Institute, ARC, Giza, Egypt. Safaa KUMARI – International Centre for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), Tunis, Tunisia. Ahmed EL-AHMED – Faculty of Agriculture, University of Aleppo, Aleppo, Syria. Mustafa HAIDAR – Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences, AUB, Lebanon. Ahmed KATBEH – Faculty of Agriculture, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan. Bouzid NASRAOUI – INAT, University of Carthage, Tunis, Tunisia. Wa’el ALMATNI – Ministry of Agriculture, Damascus, Syria. Editorial Assistant Tara ALFADHLI – P.O. Box 17399, Amman11195, Jordan. The Arab Society for Plant Protection and the Near East Regional Office of the FAO jointly publishes the Arab and Near East Plant Protection Newsletter (ANEPPNEL), three times per year. All correspondence should be sent by email to the Editor ([email protected]). Material from ANEPPNEL may be reprinted provided that appropriate credits are given. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this newsletter do not necessarily imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations or the Arab Society for Plant Protection (ASPP), concerning the legal or constitutional status of any country, territory, city or area, or its authorities or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Semiaphis Dauci (Fabricius)
    Semiaphis dauci (Fabricius) (Insecta, Hemiptera, Aphididae) – formal record of occurrence on arracacha (Arracacia xanthorrhiza Bancr.) (Apiaceae) in Brazil, morphological characterization, description of damages and arthropods associated to the culture. 53 SEMIAPHIS DAUCI (FABRICIUS) (INSECTA, HEMIPTERA, APHIDIDAE) – FORMAL RECORD OF OCCURRENCE ON ARRACACHA (ARRACACIA XANTHORRHIZA BANCR.) (APIACEAE) IN BRAZIL, MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION, DESCRIPTION OF DAMAGES AND ARTHROPODS ASSOCIATED TO THE CULTURE S. Ide1, V.A. Yuki2, H.M. Takada3, M.A. Delfino4, H. Hojo1, A.L.B.G. Peronti5, C.R. Souza-Silva5, H. Kuniyuki2, S.C.S. Bueno6, W. Yamakawa1 1Instituto Biológico, Centro de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento de Sanidade Vegetal, Av. Cons. Rodrigues Alves 1252, CEP 04014-900, São Paulo, SP, Brasil. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT This paper reports formally the occurrence and describes the damages by Semiaphis dauci (Fabricius, 1775) (Insecta, Hemiptera, Aphididae, Aphidinae, Macrosiphini) on arracacha (Arracacia xanthorrhiza Bancr.) (Apiaceae) in Brazil. The infestation was initially noted on April/2002 at Núcleo de Produção de Mudas, Departamento de Sementes Mudas e Matrizes, Coordenadoria de Assistência Técnica Integral, Secretaria de Agricultura e Abastecimento, São Bento do Sapucaí, State of São Paulo. Posteriorly the occurrence was detected in other parts of the municipality of São Bento do Sapucaí such as Serrano, Paiol Grande and Cantagalo, being the incidence higher in localities at lower altitudes. The colonies, with large number of individuals, were settled on both sides of the leaves and also hidden under petiole, but with lower number of specimens. The adult plants were underdeveloped and the growing of aphid colonies induced the blossoming. In the seedlings the symptoms were severer with reduction in the development and death of plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Gall Midges (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) of Turkey
    Türk. entomol. derg., 2005, 29 (1): 17-34 ISSN 1010-6960 Gall midges (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) of Turkey Marcela SKUHRAVÁ* Şerife BAYRAM** Halit ÇAM*** Serdar TEZCAN**** Peyman CAN***** Summary The present fauna of gall midges of Turkey includes 71 species belonging to 38 genera. Of them, 62 species are phytophagous and are associated with 59 host plant species. In this study, their zoogeographical analysis and economical importance have also been evaluated. Key words: Cecidomyiidae, Diptera, fauna, Turkey, zoogeography Anahtar sözcükler: Cecidomyiidae, Diptera, fauna, Türkiye, zoocoğrafya Introduction Until now the data on gall midges (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) existing in Turkey were encountered in papers of about twenty Turkish researchers. In present paper a summary of gall midge species occurring in the territory of Turkey has been given for the first time. The level of gall midge species knowledge in Turkey is not satisfactory enough in comparison with the knowledge of some adjacent European countries – Bulgaria and Greece, but it is much higher in comparison with the knowledge of this family in adjacent Asian countries, such as Syria, Iran and Iraq. * Czech Zoological Society, Vinicna 7, 128 00 Praha 2, Czech Republic e-mail: [email protected] ** University of Ankara, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Plant Protection, 06110, Ankara, Turkey e-mail: [email protected] *** University of Gaziosmanpasa, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Plant Protection, 60240 Tokat, Turkey **** University of Ege, Department of Plant Protection, 35100 Bornova, Izmir, Turkey ***** Aegean Forestry Research Institute Urla, Izmir, Turkey Alınış (Received: 25.03.2005 17 Trotter (1903) was the first to collect galls in Turkey in the course of his journey through Balkan Peninsula and Turkey.
    [Show full text]
  • Hessian Fly M Ayetiola Destructor (Say) 1817
    DEC11Pest of the month – November 2011 a b c Fig. 1. adult Hessian fly (a); infested young seedlings (b); Hessian fly pupae (‘flaxseed stage’) at the crown of a wheat plant (c); Photo credits: Dustin Severtson, DAFWA. Pest: Hessian fly Classification: K: Animalia, P: Arthropoda, C: Insecta, O: Diptera, F: Cecidomyiidae. Hessian fly (Mayetiola destructor) is a serious biosecurity threat to Australia’s wheat industry. It is considered an exotic high impact pest species in Australia. Should it be introduced, the Hessian fly has the capacity to establish over a wide geographic range throughout cereal cropping regions of Australia and utilise weed and native grass species to complete its life cycle. (Say) (Say) 1817 The Pest: M. destructor is a tiny fly (or midge) Host Range: Wheat is the primary host. Cereals and similar in appearance to a mosquito. All 4 life many other grasses are secondary hosts. stages (egg, larvae, pupa, adult) may be found on cereal or grass plants. Elongate, Impact: Wheat seedlings infested with Hessian fly cylindrical glossy red eggs are laid within leaf appear deep green in colour. However, the maggot veins. Hatched maggots are pale and releases digestive enzymes and stunts the plant. cylindrical growing from 0.5 to 4.0 mm long Later infestations may result in stem weakening and and feed on hidden parts of the plant such as lodging. Severe loss in wheat production has been within leaf sheaths. This feeding damage may seen in Europe and North America. It has also Hessian fly Hessian cause stunting and death of plants. Larvae lowered grain size and quality.
    [Show full text]