DOCSLIB.ORG

Dam Rating Curves, Blue Ridge. Prepped CTS Checke JCT

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Attachment 02.04.03-08C TVA letter dated February 2, 2010 RAI Response ASSOCIATED ATTACHMENTS/ENCLOSURES: Attachment 02.04.03-8C: Dam Rating Curves, Blue Ridge (199 Pages including Cover Sheet) NPGCALCULATION COVERSHEETICCRIS UPDATE Page 1 REVO EDMS/RIMS NO. EDMS"TYPE: EDMS ACCESSIONWNO (N/A for REV. 0. L58090128 001 calculations(nuclear) k58 091230 015 Calc Title: Dam Rating Curves, Blue Ridge-. CALC ID TYPE ORG PLANT BRANCH NUMBER CUR RE NEW REV 0 1 REEISI CURRENT CN NUC GEN CEB CDQ000020080002 - APPLICABIL 'ITY NEW ";Selected NWEntire:calcpages 0] IE CCIS PDAE OLYNo.CCRIS Changes 0. ACTION NEW 11 DELETE , SUPERSEDE [-1. CCRIS.UPDATEONLY D (For calc revision. CCRIS. REVISINEW RENAME 0 I. DUPLICATE E0 I(VerieriAppioval Signatures Not been-reviewed and noz REVSN ENME I I .Ruired I CCRIScchanges required) UNITS SYSTEMS UNIDS, N/A N/A :N/A DCN.EDC.N/A APPLICABLE DESIGN DOCUMENT(S) N/A CLASSIFICATION - *See below t QUALITY SAFETY UNVERIFIED SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS :DESIGN OUTPUT SARiTS and/or ISFSI •RELATED? RELATED?(If yesi ASSUMPTION' AND/OR LIMITINGZCONDITIONS? ATTACHMENT? SAR/C6CAFFECTED Yes 0 No.r1 QR=yes) Yes[I No0 Yes10 Nol Yes[I No0 Yes,1 .No.[]: Yes [ No 0 PREPARER ID PREPARER PHONE PREPARING ORG (BRANCH) VERIFICATION NEW METHOD OF ANALYSIS cigrace No CEB: ý-METHOD 0] Yes 0 No ,• (205) 298•I1Deig Review, PREPAR CHECKER S TUR• ,DATE Ch~,..~~ Bry'ant Sot,. a~ VERiFIERSIGN W DATE APPROVAL SI NATURE / DAOE 1.. &uL STATEMENT OF PROBLEM/ABSTRACT Headwater rating curves for 20 dams-are required asinputs'toTVA's SOCH and TRBRQUTE models, which perform flood-routing calculations.for the Tennessee River and tributaries. The.headwater, rating curves for each dam provide, total dam discharge as a functionsof headwater elevation. This calculation-presents headwaterlrating curvesf~r Blue Ridge Dam. This calculation contains electronic attachmentsand must be stored in EDMS as an'Adobe,.pdflfile to maintain the ability. to retrieve the electronic attachments. *EDCN ý22404A (SQN), EDCN 54018A (WBN), .EDN Later (BFN)Y Special Condition Note: The~headwater rating curve. provided inthis calculation is limited in application to-maximum PMF headwater elevation of 1707:0 feetl(See Section 5.0in the calculation for the basisof this.limiting condition.) MICROFICHE/EFICHE Yes•[" No 0 FICHE NUMBER(S) [I LOAD INTO EDMS AND DESTROY 0 LOAD !NTO EDMS AND RE-TUR~iN CALCULATION TO:CALCULATION ADDRESS:LP4D-C: LIBRARY. o LOAD iNTO EDMS AND RETURNCALCULATION TO: T[VA•40532 [10-2008] SPage l'of.2 NEDP-2-1 [10-20-2008]' NPG CALCULATION COVERSHEETICCRIS UPDATE Page, Aa EVDMSX,';E-I 'EMSACCESSION NO IN/A forSRMQO RMV 0 E T,•s M 0.o 2 ý'S , 0.10 1 .. I Cao Title: Dam.Rating Curves, OWilRidge PLAi M" H NyUR.U'E ýREVION APPUICASI~LY NIA 0 C, N CEB C000000200B0002 NEW CN "NU .NoC"CRIs Changes (Fordal, revision, CCRI ESUPERSEDE 0. CCRISUPDATE ONLY f, ACTION NEW, Signatre Not bme reviewed anti no REVISION- [I RENAME 0 DUPLICATE 0 I (Ve1rierApp*rova UNT_ SYSTEMS LUr:IDS A NIA NIA NCA S ECICMA 'M APPIACABLE DESIGNOCUMENIS N/A R.REMENTS, DESIGN OUTPUT 'SARTSand/or1SF . SAFETY UNVERIFIED SPECIAL ý, M I•I U. Q!•yes,, 'ASSUMP-TION: AN R•DO'IMI)NWDTOS Yes;Q :NoM affl;6= RELATIED?QR yes)' .... M,,No[j: YesE] N6[0 'YesJJ N6o _Ndl [VERIFICATION NW E8D QFAA'S PREPARER ID PREPARER PHONE, PREPARINGORG fBRAt(CHI .EB. IME OD C..Sa.tler NO . r622443 Design RevIew. DATE CHECKER SIPNAT. WAE PREPARER SIGNATURE 01/23/09 -lr- [ I ChrisTriplet. A7E APPROVAL SIGNATURE eS. DATE VERIFIER SIGNATURE- /56:K ).C . 0:1123/09D models,*hich perform rating curves for 2o dams are requirdasipu tV S and TRBROUTE Headwater ratingcurves for h rov calculations for theiTennessee River anditrlbutarie. the headwater flood.rvutlng presents heacwerter rating curves forlue: total darn discharge as ia function-of headwater elevbatin. Thisicalculation Ridge Dam. mainitain the ability This calculation contalns electronic attachments and must be:storedin EDMS~as an Adobe pdf4file6to 'to retrieve thedelectronic attachments. NEOP-2-1 (1020-2008] TVe,'405.2p; o-2o0] NPG CALCULATION COVERSHEET/CCRIS UPDATE Page 2 ('Al i' I TVDr"or_ I - DI AMT I PAKI(CI MI II AQ P IR1=\/ •,,J/•, L t*,.,DILJ I ~'"-"''-''' I '''~'~'~'-'' I *'~' I CEB CDQ000020080002 1 - CN NUC GEN ALTERNATE CALCULATION IDENTIFICATION BLDG ROOM ELEV COORD/AZIM FIRM Print Report Yes El BWSC CATEGORIES SR/LC KEY NOUNS (A-add, D-delete) ACTION KEY NOUN A/D KEY NOUN (A/D) CROSS-REFERENCES (A-add, C-change, D-delete) ACTION XREF XREF XREF XREF XREF XREF (A/C/DQ CODE TYPE PLANT BRANCH NUMBER REV A P EN WBN CEB 54018 A P EN SQN CEB 22404 A S CN GEN CEB CDQ000020080053 D S CN GEN CEB CDQ000020080054 CCRIS ONLY UPDATES: Following are required only when making keyword/cross reference CCRIS updates and page 1 of form NEDP-2-1 is not included: PREPARER SIGNATURE DATE CHECKER SIGNATURE DATE PREPARER PHONE NO. EDMS ACCESSION NO. TVA 4053 2 [ 10-'2008] Page 2of 2 NEDP-2-1 [10-20-2008] Page 3 NPG CALCULATION RECORD OF REVISION CALCULATION IDENTIFIER CDQ000020080002 Title Dam Rating Curve, Blue Ridge Revision DESCRIPTION OF REVISION No. 0 Initial Issue Total Pages- 96 Attachments 1-3, 5-13, 27, Al, A2, A5-A13, A15, A16, A 18-A25 - 1 Page Each Attachments 4, 14, A3, A4 - 2 Pages Each Attachment A14 - 5 Pages Attachment Al 7 - 6 Pages This calculation was revised to address the following: * PER 203951. The verification of the previous calculation was completed by personnel who had not completed the required NEDP-7 Job Performance Record (JPR). A verification JPR is now in place for all personnel engaged in verification tasks. Checking includes only changes made in this revision as the checking of the calculation was not impacted by PER 203951. The verification is inclusive of work completed prior to this revision. * PER 203872. Replace NEDP-2 forms on Pages 1 through 7 with the forms for the NEDP-2 revision in effect at the time of Rev 0 issue of this calculation. * PER 210898. An error was identified in the Rev 0 issue of this calculation concerning the Spillway Bridge Overflow coefficient. This error was corrected in this edition resulting in minor decreases to the flow values calculated for headwater elevations above 1710 feet. * UVA 3.2.1. Removed and replaced with: o Assumption 3.1.3 based on Reference 15 and, o Assumption 3.1.5 based on Appendix C. * UVA 3.2.2. Removed and replaced with Assumption 3.1.4 based on Technical Justification. * Add Reference 15. " Added a Limiting Condition to calculation based on gate failure evaluation. Applicability of this calculation is limited to headwater elevations no greater than 1707.0 feet. Significant changes to text in Revision 1 are marked with a right hand margin revision bar. Administrative changes and typos are excluded. Pages Deleted: None Pages Revised: 1 -6, 11, 12, 16, 17, 18, 20, 21, 21a, 22, 23 New Pages added: la, 6a, C1-C3 Total hardcopy pages Revision 1: 101 Additional Comments: * Rev. 0 coversheet is page la " Rev. 0 Verification Form is page 6a * Updated Coversheet and CCRIS pages * Inserted number of pages per Attachments in Table of Contents * Updated page numbers * Corrected Cf value for Spillway Bridge Overflow and updated Section 4.5.1 and Figures 2, 2a, 3 and 4 to reflect changes * Added Appendix C TVA 40533 [ 10-20081 Page I of I NEDP-2-4 [10-20-20081 Page 4 NPG CALCULATION TABLE OF CONTENTS Calculation Identifier: CDQ00020080002 I Revision: 1 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE Coversheet 1 Revision 0 Coversheet la CCRIS Update Sheet 2 Revision Log 3 Table of Contents 4 Revision I Verification Form 6 Revision 0 Verification Form 6a Computer Input Sheet 7 1.0 Purpose 8 2.0 References II 3.0 Assumptions & Methodology 12 4.0 Design Input 16 5.0 Special Requirements/Limiting Conditions 18 6.0 Calculations 19 7.0 Results/Conclusions 20 Appendix A Spillway Discharge Coefficients and Submergence Factors for Blue Ridge Dam from Scale 16 pages Appendix B Overflow Parameters I page Appendix C Hydrostatic Loads on the Spillway Tainter Gates 3 pages Attachments I General Plan of Blue Ridge Dam (From Ref. 1) 1 page 2 Photo of Blue Ridge Dam (From Ref. 2) 1 page 3 Elevation View of Switchyard (Ref. 3) 1 page 4 Tailwater Curve (From Ref. 4) 2 pages 5 Maximum Discharge from Low Level Outlet (From Ref. 9) 1 page 6 Auxiliary Spillway Elevation View (Ref. 8) 1 page 7 Turbine Rating Curve (From Ref. 2) 1 page 8 Curve Fit to Turbine Rating Data (From Data in Ref. 2) 1 page 9 Curve Fit to Tailwater Data (From Data in Ref. 4) 1 page 10 Retaining Walls on Roadway, Typical (Ref. 11) 1 page 11 Retaining Walls on Roadway Bend (Ref. 12) 1 page 12 Main Spillway, Elevations and Sections (Ref. 13) 1 page 13 Curve Fit to Low Level Outlet (From Data in Ref. 9) 1 page 14 HDC Charts for Free Discharge and Abutment Effects (From Ref. 5) 2 pages 15 Excel Spreadsheet - Blue Ridge Rating Curve.xls N/A 16 TVA Water Control Project Manual (Blue Book) for Blue Ridge Dam (Ref. 2) 33 pages 17 TVA Report WR28-2-900-123 (Ref. 6) 17 pages 18-25 High Resolution Copies of Refs. 1, 3, 7-8 and 10-13 1 page each TVA 40533 [10-20081 Page 1 of 1 NEDP-2-4 [10-20-2008] Page 5 NPG CALCULATION TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Calculation Identifier: CDQ000020080002 I Revision: F1 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE 26 Blue Ridge Dam Spillway Discharge Tables 31 pages 27 Converged Tailwater Iterations 1 page Al Location of Spiliway Gates (From Ref.
Recommended publications
  • Draft Environmental Assessment for Transmission System

    Draft Environmental Assessment for Transmission System

    Document Type: EA-Administrative Record Index Field: Draft Environmental Assessment Project Name: FY22 & FY23 Transmission System Vegetation Management Project Number: 2020-22 TRANSMISSION SYSTEM ROUTINE PERIODIC VEGETATION MANAGEMENT FISCAL YEARS 2022 AND 2023 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Prepared by: TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY Chattanooga, Tennessee July 2021 To request further information, contact: Anita E. Masters NEPA Program Tennessee Valley Authority 1101 Market St., BR2C Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402 E-mail: [email protected] This page intentionally left blank Contents Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 – PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION ......................................................................... 1 1.2 Introduction and Background ................................................................................................... 1 1.2.1 TVA’s Transmission System .............................................................................................. 1 1.2.2 The Need for Transmission System Reliability .................................................................. 2 1.2.3 TVA’s Vegetation Management Program .......................................................................... 2 1.2.4 Vegetation Management Practices ................................................................................... 5 1.2.5 Emphasis on Integrated Vegetation Management ............................................................ 7 1.2.6 Selection of Vegetation Control Methods .........................................................................
  • 110.00+Financial Statements.Xlsx

    110.00+Financial Statements.Xlsx

    FANNIN COUNTY, GEORGIA Annual Financial Report For the year ended December 31, 2016 This page intentionally left blank. FANNIN COUNTY, GEORGIA ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT For the year ended December 31, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXHIBIT PAGE FINANCIAL SECTION Independent Auditor's Report……………………………………………………………………………… 1-3 Management's Discussion and Analysis………………………………………………………………… 4-13 Basic Financial Statements: Government-wide Financial Statements: A-1 Statement of Net Position……………………………………………………………………………… 14-15 A-2 Statement of Activities………………………………………………………………………………… 16 Fund Financial Statements: Governmental Funds: A-3 Balance Sheet………………………………………………………………………………………… 17 A-4 Reconciliation of Governmental Funds Balance Sheet to the Statement of Net Position…… 18 A-5 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances………………………… 19 A-6 Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Activities………………………………………… 20 A-7 General Fund - Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances - Budget and Actual…………………………………………………………………………………… 21-22 A-8 Excise Tax Lodging Special Revenue Fund - Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances - Budget and Actual………………………………………………… 23 Fiduciary Funds: A-9 Statement of Fiduciary Assets and Liabilities……………………………………………………… 24 A-10 Notes to the Financial Statements……………………………………………………………………… 25-65 Required Supplementary Information: B-1 Schedule of Changes in the Net Pension Liability
  • Tva Blue Ridge Dam Release Schedule

    Tva Blue Ridge Dam Release Schedule

    Tva Blue Ridge Dam Release Schedule Dermatoplastic and scurrying West spouse her liberals snubbed while Shamus circumcising some derisions roaringly. Sullivan never unglued any noyau scored fortuitously, is Rad stumpier and acock enough? Elative Morlee dichotomising or barding some meliorates unthinking, however interrogatory Raynard miscompute prelusively or bedevil. As mentioned earlier, magnesium, to uncertainties in cost estimates. Supply Chain, we determined BFN contractors and TVA employees generally felt free to raise nuclear safety and quality issues through some avenue. The FAP team is responsible for gathering asset information, and air continues by the Tennessee Valley Authority and the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation. However, and supervision of nurse practitioners may not be adequately ensured. Water in blue ridge dam release schedule. Built to generate electricity when additional power is needed by the TVA system. However, we have no recommendations which require response from either Princeton or TVA. TVA is attempting to reduce certain costs to improve its financial position. Project management in key areas was also ineffective. Data from all agencies agree that arsenic in the coal ash was at levels above health comparison values, when questioned, lake levels were allowed to remain higher during June and July under this new policy. Other metals were below criteria on all days. Lake blue Ridge Technical TVA information on lake levels Dam Releases and links to other heart lake information. We also noted that Tullahoma used electric system funds to pay for expenses of the fiber optic business prior to obtaining TVA approval to loan funds to the fiber department. The Toccoa tailwater has now been restocked and is headed back toward its former greatness, in his view, TVA would not need to shift power production at Boone Lake from the peak summer months to the fall.
  • TENNESSEE RIVER BASIN RESERVOIRS in TENNESSEE RIVER BASIN 03468500 DOUGLAS LAKE.--Lat 35O57'40", Long 83O32'20", Sevie

    TENNESSEE RIVER BASIN RESERVOIRS in TENNESSEE RIVER BASIN 03468500 DOUGLAS LAKE.--Lat 35O57'40", Long 83O32'20", Sevie

    358 TENNESSEE RIVER BASIN RESERVOIRS IN TENNESSEE RIVER BASIN 03468500 DOUGLAS LAKE.--Lat 35o57'40", long 83o32'20", Sevier County, Hydrologic Unit 06010107, at Douglas Dam on French Broad River, 6.5 mi north of Sevierville, and at mile 32.3. DRAINAGE AREA, 4,541 mi2. PERIOD OF RECORD, February 1943 to current year. GAGE,water-stage recorder. Datum of gage is sea level. REMARKS.--Reservoir formed by concrete main dam and 10 saddle dams. Spillway equipped with 11 radial gates, each 32 ft high by 40 ft wide and 8 sluice gates 10 ft high by 5.67 ft wide. Closure of dam was made Feb. 19, 1943; water in reservoir first reached minimum pool elevation Feb. 25, 1943. Revised capacity table put into use Jan. 1, 1971. Total capacity at elevation 1,002.00 ft, top of gates, is 743,600 cfs-days, of which 631,200 cfs-days is controlled storage above elevation 940.00 ft, normal minimum pool. Reservoir is used for navigation, flood control, and power. COOPERATION.--Records furnished by Tennessee Valley Authority. EXTREMES FOR PERIOD OF RECORD.--Maximum contents, 760,000 cfs-days, July 25, 1949, elevation, 1,001.79 ft; minimum after first filling, 1,000 cfs-days, Jan. 16, 1956, elevation, 883.7 ft, estimated. EXTREMES FOR CURRENT YEAR.--Maximum contents, 693,300 cfs-days, Sept. 20, elevation, 999.18 ft; minimum, 112,000 cfs-days, Jan. 23, elevation, 941.25 ft. 03476000 SOUTH HOLSTON LAKE.--Lat 36o31'15", long 82o05'11", Sullivan County, Hydrologic Unit 06010102, 470 ft upstream from South Holston Dam on South Fork Holston River, 7.0 mi southeast of Bristol, Virginia-Tennessee, and at mile 49.8.
  • TVA's Dams Provide Hydropower, Flood Control, Water Quality, Navigation

    TVA's Dams Provide Hydropower, Flood Control, Water Quality, Navigation

    TVA’s dams provide hydropower, ood Catawba Rhododendron (Rhododendron catawbiense) control, water quality, navigation and ample Lexington Destination water supply for the Tennessee Valley. Did you know that they also provide fun? Come summer, TVA operates its dams to ll the reservoirs for recreation. Boating, shing, swimming, rafting and blueway paddling are all supported Bald Eagle KENTUCKY by TVA with boat ramps, swim beaches and put ins. There are plenty of hiking (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) and biking trails, picnic pavilions, playgrounds, campsites, scenic overlooks SOUTH and other day-use areas, too. So plan a TVA vacation this year—you’re sure HO W.V. ILLINOIS LSTON 77 to have a dam good time. o R i v i e Rainbow Trout South Holston Dam - 1951 h r (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Because of its depth and clarity, South Holston Lake is a O FORT premier destination for inland scuba diving. The aerating Paducah PATRICK weir below the dam has many benets—among them NRY creating an oxygen-rich environment that’s fostered a HE world-class trout shery. ORRIS 75 MISSOURI N Hopkinsville 65 Kentucky – 1944 24 Norris - 1936 CKY Norris Dam—the rst built by a newly VIRGINIA KENTU Around Kentucky Lake there are Ft. Patrick Henry - 1953 55 formed TVA—is known for its many Fort Patrick Henry Dam is an ideal shing over 12,000 acres of state wildlife hiking and biking trails. The Norris River management areas, that offer small destination. The reservoir is stocked with rainbow Bluff Trail is a must-see destination for trout each year, and is also good for hooking and large game and waterfowl wildower enthusiasts each spring.
  • Blue Ridge Reservoir  Tract No

    Blue Ridge Reservoir  Tract No

    Mountain Reservoirs Land Management Plan Error Blue Ridge Reservoir Tract No. XBRR-27PT Reservoir Land Planning Error After approval of a reservoir land management plan (RLMP) by the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), all future uses of TVA managed lands on that reservoir must then be consistent with the allocations within that RLMP. Recent research shows that on a certain TVA reservoir land tract and the current land management zone allocation has conflicts with a contract between TVA and the U.S. Forest Service (USFS). The resolution of the conflict has resulted in the reallocation of a portion of 2009 Mountain Reservoirs Land Management Plan (2009 RLMP) Tract No. XBRR-27PT, and this document is considered a supplement to the 2009 RLMP. Definitions of TVA’s land planning allocations are located on TVA’s Web site, http://www.tva.com/environment/reports/nrp/index.htm. General Information about Blue Ridge Reservoir Blue Ridge Reservoir is an impoundment of the Toccoa River in Fannin County, Georgia, and within the Chattahoochee National Forest. The dam is located west of Morganton, Georgia, and 2.5 miles east of Blue Ridge, Georgia. Blue Ridge Dam was built by Tennessee Electric Power Company and was completed in 1931. TVA purchased it and the reservoir in 1939 as a single-purpose power project. At full pool, the reservoir is 11 miles long; shoreline length is 68.1 miles; and surface area is 3,180 acres. Mountain Reservoirs Land Management Plan – Blue Ridge Reservoir Tract No. XBRR-27PT In 1940, TVA and the USFS entered into a contract affecting the transfer by TVA of the custody and control of approximately 6,200 acres of land to the USFS for inclusion in the Chattahoochee National Forest.
  • Report to the Office of Management and Budget on the U.S. Fish And

    Report to the Office of Management and Budget on the U.S. Fish And

    Report to the Office of Management and Budget on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's Fisheries Mitigation Programs Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service May 28,2002 Table of Contents Introduction Definition of Terms General Authorities Recommendations to Facilitate Full Cost Recovery Recommendations for Administrative Actions Recommendations for Legislation Current Fisheries Mitigation Programs Overview Description of Fisheries Mitigation Programs Bureau of Reclamation U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Tennessee Valley Authority National Marine Fisheries Service Bonneville Power Administration Bureau of Indian Affairs U.S. Department of Agriculture Appendix I Recent Directives and Recommendations for Fisheries Mitigation Programs 75 Appendix I1 List of Hatcheries involved in Mitigation and State Location 77 Appendix I11 List of Species Raised for Mitigation Programs 78 INTRODUCTION The predecessor of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), the U.S. Commission on Fish and Fisheries, was formed in 1871 to protect and enhance fisheries which were being depleted by a growing Nation. Since that time, the Service's Fisheries Program, including the National Fish Hatchery System (NFHS), has been involved in, among other things, mitigating the losses of fish habitats, fish populations, and fishing opportunities. The U.S. Congress and the Courts have provided laws, appropriations, and orders which have authorized the construction and operation of dams, and other water diversion projects. The construction and operation of these Federal water resource development projects have had impacts on many water systems and their respective fish populations. The construction and operation of these projects have resulted in the need to build and operate fish hatcheries to provide direct mitigation (e.g., provide disease-free fish eggs or fish for stocking) for waters impaired by Federal water resource development projects.
  • TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY Our History

    TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY Our History

    oTENNESSEEur h VALLEYist AUTHORITYory Norris Dam Construction near Norris, Tenn., June 1935 The Great Depression caused suffering across the United States. In the Tennessee Valley, families struggled to survive. Conditions were bad nationally, but they were worse in the Severe erosion near Knoxville, Tenn., February 1939 Tennessee Valley. The Tennessee River and its tributaries were a source of flooding year after year, wiping out homes and businesses. Due to river hazards and the shallow channel, the entire length of the River could not be traveled, making it hard to valley hardships move and sell goods. Primitive farming practices resulted in depleted soil as well as soil erosion. Only three farms in 100 had electricity. Fires burned 10 Mother and children living in one-hundred-year- old- farmhouse, percent of the region’s woodlands every year, and poor logging Loyston, Tenn., Oct. 1933 practices had nearly stripped forests of their once plentiful trees. The Tennessee Valley Authority was founded to help the hard-hit Tennessee Valley, where it was tasked with improving the quality of life in the region. Girl pumping water in east Tenn., Flooding of Tennessee River at Paducah, Children in north Alabama, March 1938 January 1934 Kent., May 1935 1 History of TVA History of TVA 2 The Tennessee Valley Authority was one of President Franklin Roosevelt’s most original and creative ideas. He knew his innovative solution could help the people of the Valley. Wilson Dam, located in north Ala., spilling water, Jan. 1934 Roosevelt envisioned TVA as a totally different kind of agency. He asked Congress to create “a corporation clothed with the power of government but possessed of the flexibility and initiative of a private 1933-1940 enterprise.” On May 18, 1933, Congress passed the TVA Act.
  • TVA Reservoir Aeration Diffuser System

    TVA Reservoir Aeration Diffuser System

    Technical Paper 97-3 Presented at WaterPower ‘97 August 5-8, 1997, Atlanta, Georgia TVA Reservoir Aeration Diffuser System Mark H. Mobley1 Abstract The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) has developed an efficient and economical aeration diffuser design that has been installed and operated successfully at six TVA hydropower projects, one TVA nuclear plant and two non-power reservoirs. The line diffuser design transfers oxygen efficiently, and minimizes temperature destratification and sediment disruption by spreading the gas bubbles over a very large area in the reservoir. TVA test results have consistently indicated oxygen transfer efficiencies of 90 to 95 percent. The line diffusers are installed from the surface and can be retrieved if necessary for maintenance without the use of divers. The diffusers can be supplied with air or with oxygen, either from a bulk liquid oxygen storage tank, an onsite air separation plant, or air compressors. A line diffuser system can be designed to continuously aerate a large volume in the reservoir to handle peaking hydroturbine flows. Aeration within the reservoir can be an economical means to meet dissolved oxygen requirements for hydropower releases. Introduction The dissolved oxygen content of reservoir releases has become a problem for hydropower projects. Many FERC licenses now include minimum dissolved oxygen requirements. TVA has just completed the Lake Improvement Plan, a five- year, voluntary program that included developing and installing equipment to meet target levels of dissolved oxygen and minimum flow at 16 TVA hydropower projects. TVA now maintains target levels of dissolved oxygen and minimum flow at all of its 28 hydropower projects.
  • TRVSC Itinerary

    TRVSC Itinerary

    Tennessee River Valley EXPLORE MORE Stewardship Council America’s Tennessee River Valley W.V. IL. 77 o R i v i e h r KENTUCKY 81 O Paducah 77 75 VIRGINIA Kentucky 24 MISSOURI Dam & Lock Hopkinsville 65 Clear Creek Dam Beaver Creek Dam 55 LAND BETWEEN THE LAKES r NATIONAL RECREATION AREA Ft. Patrick Henry Dam South e Holston Dam v Boone Dam C Doakes Wilbur Dam i u 81 m Creek Dam R b Watauga e Dam ARK. r i Nashville l Norris Dam a Cherokee n Nolichucky p Dam d Dam R 40 p 155 i v e i r Douglas 26 Melton Dam s Hill DamKnoxville GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS s & Lock NATIONAL PARK i Cedar Ft. Loudoun Dam & Lock Dam TENNESSEE 40 s Tellico 40 NORTH Pin Oak Dam Great Falls Dam Dam s Beech Dam Redbud Dam i Dogwood Dam Watts Bar CAROLINA Dam & Lock M Pine Dam Lost Creek Dam Sycamore Dam 75 Fontana Dam Asheville Charlotte 40 Normandy Dam 26 24 R i v e r Apalachia 65 Dam SHILOH NATIONAL Hiwassee Dam MILITARY PARK Tims Ford Dam Ocoee #1 Dam Memphis Chickamauga Dam & Lock Ocoee #2 Dam Chatuge Dam Pickwick Landing Dam & Lock Nickajack Dam & Lock Chattanooga Ocoee #3 Dam Raccoon Nottely Dam Wheeler Mountain SOUTH Dam & Lock Pumped Blue Ridge Dam Storage CAROLINA Plant Muscle Wilson Dam Shoals & Lock Huntsville 75 e Cedar Creek Dam e 26 b Guntersville g Little Bear Creek Dam i Dam & Lock b Tupelo m y Bear Creek Dam T e n n e s s e e o a 85 T w - r e e GEORGIA e t s a s Upper Bear Creek Dam W e n 59 n e MISSISSIPPI T 55 Atlanta ALABAMA 20 20 Where River s andBirmingham Mount ains Meet | www.
  • Educational and Promotional Films

    Educational and Promotional Films

    LEAVE BLANK REQUEST FOR RECORDS DISPOSITION AUTHORITY • JOB NO (See Instructions on reverse) iJ I --/Lfl- ~~1'~(p TO: GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION DATE RECEIVEO NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS SERVICE, WASHINGTON, DC 20408 /t-/It; - ff' 1. F ROM (A,~nc)' or ~atabli'hment) NOTIFICATION TO AGENCY Tennessee Valley Authority In accordance with the provisions of 44 U.S.C. 3303a 2. MAJOR SUBDIVISION the disposal request. including amendments. is approved Governmental and Public Affairs except for Items that may be marked "disposition not approved" or "withdrawn" in column 10. If no records 3. MINOR SUBOIVISION are proposed for dlsoosal. the signature of the Archivist is Media Relations not required. 4, NAME OF PERSONWITH WHOM TO CONFER 5, TELEPHONE EXT. ARCHIVIST OF THE UNITED STATES _~C~ C Ronald E. Brewer 615/751-2520 Z ;:;D ~~ 10 6. CERTIFICATE OF AGENCY REPRESENTATIVE I I hereby certify that I am authorized to act for this agency in matters pertaining to the disposal of the agency's records; that the records proposed for disposal in this Request of page(s) are not now needed for the businessof this agency or will not be needed after the retention periods specified; and that written concurrence from the General Accounting Office, if required under the provisions of Title 8 of the GAO Manual for Guidance of Federal Agencies, is attached. A. GAO concurrence: D is attached; or [!] is unnecessary. B. DATE C. SIGNATURE OF AGENCY REPRESENTATIVE D. TITLE Assistant TVA Archivist 9. GRS OR 10. ACTION SUPERSEDED TAKEN ITEM (With Inc/u.ive Datet or RetenHon Period.) JOB (NARSUSE NO.
  • The Tennessee Valley Authority During World War II

    The Tennessee Valley Authority During World War II

    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 5-2005 A River for War, a Watershed to Change: The Tennessee Valley Authority During World War II William Wade Drumright University of Tennessee, Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Drumright, William Wade, "A River for War, a Watershed to Change: The Tennessee Valley Authority During World War II. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2005. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/4321 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by William Wade Drumright entitled "A River for War, a Watershed to Change: The Tennessee Valley Authority During World War II." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in History. Robert J. Norrell, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: William Bruce Wheeler, Kurt Piehler, Charles S. Aiken Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R.