DOCSLIB.ORG

CONUS++ Airfields and Airports

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CONUS++ Airfields and Airports CONUS++ Airfields and Airports MetaVR™ has built several virtual U.S. airports and airfields for rendering in Virtual Reality Scene Generator™ (VRSG™). These airports and airfields are available on MetaVR’s 3D terrain of Continental U.S. plus Alaska and Hawaii (CONUS++). Overview All the CONUS++ virtual airports and airfields have 1 meter per pixel (mpp) or better resolution. Most have higher resolution insets, with imagery ranging from 0.15 mpp to 0.60 mpp, blended with the underlying CONUS++ 1 mpp terrain imagery. Elevation sources range from DTED 1 to 30 meters-per-post (mpp) to 10 mpp blended for seamless transition to custom elevation that matches FAA airfield elevations with at least 95% accuracy. In addition to models of runways with runway lights, taxiways, markings and signage, culture models on the airfields include Real-time MetaVR VRSG scene overlooking virtual Tucson International control towers, terminals, hangars and other buildings, jetbridges, Airport (KTUS) on MetaVR’s CONUS++ terrain. fuel tanks, windsocks, antennas, vegetation, and lightpoints. All cultural features on the airfields, geospecific and geotypical, To date, MetaVR has built some 26 airports and airfields. The are geolocated on the terrain. virtual airports/airfields available in round-earth Metadesic terrain format as of October 2016 are: Available airports/airfields Adams Field / Clinton National Airport (KLIT) Albuquerque International Sunport / Kirtland AFB (KABQ) Austin-Bergstrom International Airport (KAUS) Baltimore Washington Int’l Thurgood Marshall Airport (KBWI) Bismarck Municipal Airport (KBIS) Burlington International Airport / Vermont ANG Base (KBTV) Cairns Army Airfield at Fort Rucker (KOZR) Carswell Field at Ft. Worth NAS Joint Reserve Base (KNFW) Charleston Air Force Base / International Airport (KCHS) Homestead Air Reserve Base (KHST) Lackland Air Force Base (KSKF) Laguna Army Airfield at Yuma Proving Ground (KLGF) Lancaster Airport (KLNS) Real-time MetaVR VRSG scene of UH-72A MEP and CH-47 entities at Laredo International Airport (KLRD) virtual Muir Army Airfield (KMUI) on MetaVR’s CONUS++ terrain. Lincoln Airport (KLNK) Los Alamitos Army Airfield (KSLI) All airports/airfields were built with MetaVR Terrain Tools for Esri® Luke Air Force Base (KLUF) ArcGIS® in MetaVR’s round-earth Metadesic™ terrain format. McEntire Joint National Guard Base (KMMT) Culture content was mostly placed in VRSG Scenario Editor, with Martin State Airport (KMTN) instanced vegetation placed in Terrain Tools. The runway model Muir Army Airfield (KMUI) was placed with MetaVR’s Curve Runway tool. Nellis Air Force Base (KLSV) Many virtual airfields were built at the request of customers. In Pinal Airpark (KMZJ) most cases, a combination of geotypical airfield models from Redstone Army Airfield (KHUA) MetaVR’s extensive culture model libraries were used and a site- Ryan Airfield (KRYN) specific control tower was built (based on publicly available pho- Stockton Metropolitan Airport (KSCK) tos). All contain accurate runways and runway lights, markings, Tucson International Airport (KTUS) and signage. Culture on some airfields are geospecific, based on photos of the buildings and other structures on the airfield. www.metavr.com | [email protected] | US 617-739-2667 Real-time MetaVR VRSG scenes featuring details of various CONUS virtual airports and airfields. On an ongoing basis, MetaVR’s CONUS++ 3D terrain is updated high-resolution imagery, our remotely piloted image collection as new source data becomes available, or upon a customer’s aircraft, the MetaVRC™, can capture sub-inch imagery. order to have a new airport or airfield built. • Whether placement of culture on the terrain is required, and Ordering and delivery whether the culture would be from our 3D model libraries or MetaVR’s CONUS++ 3D terrain is delivered in Metadesic format from a set of your own models in FBX or FLT format. (We can on a set of six external hard drives, organized by region. The convert FBX and FLT models to our model format.) CONUS++ 3D terrain datasets are considered “Additional Materi- • Whether the creation of custom models is required for your als” and are provided “as is” as described in our license agree- AOI terrain product. ment. Although MetaVR might modify or enhance the original source imagery, some visual artifacts from the source imagery Any imagery supplied to us by customers must be color bal- might remain in the terrain tiles. anced, orthorectified, and form a mosaic that covers the AOI(s). Ordering new 3D terrain of an area of interest The quote for the AOI terrain project contains no labor-based If your site is interested in having MetaVR build 3D terrain of costs. Upon your acceptance of the quote, we will proceed to an area of interest (AOI), such as an airfield, in our round-earth build the 3D terrain. Payment is required upon acceptance of the Metadesic terrain tile format, provide us with a specification. You terrain product. can supply your own AOI source data for a custom terrain build. Upon a customer’s acceptance of the AOI terrain product, Using this data, we can provide a quote for your terrain product. MetaVR retains right to redistribute the terrain it has built, free Pricing considerations include: of charge to all US Government agencies and contractors (for • Overall size of the AOI (region, airfield, MOUT site, and so on). official use only). The compiled Metadesic terrain tiles will be dis- tributed with MetaVR VRSG software, as agreed by both parties • Whether you are supplying source imagery. If you do not have and provided by the quotation terms and conditions. source imagery data for the AOI, we can obtain it, and will factor the resolution of the required imagery into the quote. For ultra To request a quote for a 3D terrain product, contact MetaVR. See MetaVR’s brochure CONUS++ 3D Terrain or the MetaVR website for more information about the CONUS++ virtual terrain. MetaVR’s CONUS++ 3D terrain in Metadesic format is available for purchase to all MetaVR customers who are on active VRSG soft- ware maintenance and are US Government or NATO agencies or contractors (for official use only). The terrain will run only with a valid VRSG software license and active software maintenance. For US-domestic use only, not available for export. A fee covers processing large quantities of data into Metadesic format and hard drive distribution media. The CONUS++ 3D terrain set is available in its entirety or in regions of interest. For more information, contact [email protected] or scan the QR code to your mobile device. MetaVR and the MetaVR logo are registered trademarks, and Virtual Reality Scene Generator, VRSG, Metadesic, and the phrase “geospecific simulation with game quality graphics” are trademarks of MetaVR, Inc. Metadesic is protected by US Patent 7,425,952. Esri and ArcGIS are registered trademarks of Esri. All other brand or product names are trademarks of their respective companies. Copyright © 2018 MetaVR, Inc..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ADOT's $5.7B CIP Budget Cuts Highway Spending to $3.5B
    Friday Volume 4 Issue 37 Issue Date: June 28, 2013 CONNECTING THE LOCAL BUILDING INDUSTRY ADOT’s $5.7B CIP Budget Cuts Highway Spending to $3.5B By Eric Jay Toll for The gavel pounded “approved” on In a time when maintaining the the detailed subscriber-only 2013 Arizona Builder’s a challenging $5.7B ADOT budget. system and meeting growing Capital Project Issue. The subscriber- only 2014 Capital Project Issue will Exchange When you take out $2.6B from economic demands screams for Maricopa and Pima county taxpayers more improvements and projects, be published July 30). This includes and $1.2B for airports, the rest of the agency had to slash more than Maricopa and Pima county taxpayer- Arizona gets a paltry $1.9B for roads. $350M from its projected budget. voted revenue, airport and transit spending—most of which is paid Legislative robbery, improved fuel To put the current five year plan with federal grants. economy, and recession-caused into perspective, last year ADOT revenue declines combined to drain projected that it would spend $5.5B State Spending Drops $2B over 5 capital dollars from the Arizona for highways between fiscal 2013 Years Department of Transportation. and 2017 (AZBEX, July 31, 2012 and The five year capital budget covering fiscal 2014-2018 is a $500M drop from last year. Combine this year’s reduction with cuts last year, and the 2014-2018 budget is $2.2B less than the 5-year plan adopted in 2011. At the same time, the state’s road system cries out for increases maintenance and expanded capacity at an even higher pace as the state starts its post-recession growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Strategic Business Plan
    AIRPORT STRATEGIC BUSINESS PLAN ___________________________ MARANA REGIONAL AIRPORT MARANA, ARIZONA | FEBRUARY 2017 Marana Regional Airport Airport Strategic Business Plan Final Report Prepared for Town of Marana, Arizona By The Genesis Consulting Group, LLC 1202 E Maryland Ave, Suite 1D Phoenix, AZ 85018 In Association With Armstrong Consultants, Inc. February 2017 ADOT No. E5S3N . TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................................ 1 Marana Regional Airport – Business Plan .................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Airport Mission ............................................................................................................................................................... 2 Situational Analysis ......................................................................................................................................................... 2 Overall Airport Development ...................................................................................................................................... 3 New Business Development Opportunities .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Blocking Display of ADS-B Information Eagle Breeding Areas Spring 2018 Backcountry Line Up
    In this issue: Blocking Display of ADS-B Information Eagle Breeding Areas Spring 2018 Backcountry Line Up January 2018 APA NEWSLETTER ____________________________________________________________ President’s Report Tommy Thomason, APA President ......................................... 2 Executive Director’s Report Jim Timm, APA Executive Director ....................................... 3-5 Spring 2018 Backcountry Line Up Mark Spencer, APA Vice President ......................................... 7 Eagle Breeding Areas Tommy Thomason, APA President .................................... 8-11 AZ Aviation Accident Summary Jim Timm, APA Executive Director ................................... 14-15 Blocking Display of ADS-B Information Tommy Thomason, APA President ....................................... 15 Thanks from Girl Scout Troop No. 275 .................. 16 GAJSC Topic of the Month Enhanced Vision Systems ...................................................... 17 — SHORT FINAL — Looking Both Ways Howard Deevers ............................................................... 18-19 GAARMS: Accident Trends Fred Gibbs ......................................................................... 20-22 AZ Airport Focus—Cottonwood Brian Schober ................................................................... 24-25 — UPCOMING EVENTS — Old Town Cottonwood Tour & Safety Seminar 26 Phx 99’s Flying Companion Seminar ..................... 27 Arizona Airparks ................................................................ 28 APA Website, Newsletter,
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Impact of Arizona's Principal Military Operations
    Economic Impact Of Arizona’s Principal Military Operations 2008 Prepared by In collaboration with Final Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Chapter One INTRODUCTION, BACKGROUND AND STUDY 1 METHODOLOGY Chapter Two DESCRIPTIONS OF ARIZONA’S PRINCIPAL 11 MILITARY OPERATIONS Chapter Three EMPLOYMENT AND SPENDING AT ARIZONA’S 27 PRINCIPAL MILITARY OPERATIONS Chapter Four ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF ARIZONA’S PRINCIPAL 32 MILITARY OPERATIONS Chapter Five STATE AND LOCAL TAX REVENUES DERIVED FROM 36 ARIZONA’S PRINCIPAL MILITARY OPERATIONS Chapter Six COMPARISONS TO THE MILITARY INDUSTRY IN 38 ARIZONA Chapter Seven COMPARISONS OF THE MILITARY INDUSTRY IN FY 43 2000 AND FY 2005 APPENDICES Appendix One HOW IMPLAN WORKS A-1 Appendix Two RETIREE METHODOLOGY A-6 Appendix Three ECONOMETRIC MODEL INPUTS A-7 Appendix Four DETAILED STATEWIDE MODEL OUTPUT A-19 Appendix Five REGIONAL IMPACT INFORMATION A-22 The Maguire Company ESI Corporation LIST OF TABLES Page Table 3-1 Summary of Basic Personnel Statistics 27 Arizona’s Major Military Operations Table 3-2 Summary of Military Retiree Statistics 28 Arizona Principal Military Operations Table 3-3 Summary of Payroll and Retirement Benefits 30 Arizona’s Major Military Operations Table 3-4 Summary of Spending Statistics 31 Arizona’s Major Military Operations Table 4-1 Summary of Statewide Economic Impacts 34 Arizona’s Major Military Operations Table 5-1 Summary of Statewide Fiscal Impacts 37 Arizona’s Military Industry Table 5-2 Statewide Fiscal Impacts 37 Arizona’s Military Industry Table 6-1 Comparison of Major Industries / Employers in Arizona 41 Table 7-1 Comparison of Military Industry Employment in 43 FY 2000 and FY 2005 Table 7-2 Comparison of Military Industry Economic Output in 43 FY 2000 and FY 2005 The Maguire Company ESI Corporation Arizona’s Principal Military Operations Acknowledgements We wish to acknowledge and thank the leadership and personnel of the various military operations included within this study.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Pima County Multi-Species Conservation Plan, Arizona
    United States Department of the Interior Fish and ,Vildlife Service Arizona Ecological Services Office 2321 West Royal Palm Road, Suite 103 Phoenix, Arizona 85021-4951 Telephone: (602) 242-0210 Fax: (602) 242-2513 In reply refer to: AESO/SE 22410-2006-F-0459 April 13, 2016 Memorandum To: Regional Director, Fish and Wildlife Service, Albuquerque, New Mexico (ARD-ES) (Attn: Michelle Shaughnessy) Chief, Arizona Branch, Re.. gul 7/to . D'vision, Army Corps of Engineers, Phoenix, Arizona From: Acting Field Supervisor~ Subject: Biological and Conference Opinion on the Pima County Multi-Species Conservation Plan, Arizona This biological and conference opinion (BCO) responds to the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) requirement for intra-Service consultation on the proposed issuance of a section lO(a)(l)(B) incidental take permit (TE-84356A-O) to Pima County and Pima County Regional Flood Control District (both herein referenced as Pima County), pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (U.S.C. 1531-1544), as amended (ESA), authorizing the incidental take of 44 species (4 plants, 7 mammals, 8 birds, 5 fishes, 2 amphibians, 6 reptiles, and 12 invertebrates). Along with the permit application, Pima County submitted a draft Pima County Multi-Species Conservation Plan (MSCP). On June 10, 2015, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) requested programmatic section 7 consultation for actions under section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CW A), including two Regional General Permits and 16 Nationwide Permits, that are also covered activities in the MSCP. This is an action under section 7 of the ESA that is separate from the section 10 permit issuance to Pima Couny.
    [Show full text]
  • CARES ACT GRANT AMOUNTS to AIRPORTS (Pursuant to Paragraphs 2-4) Detailed Listing by State, City and Airport
    CARES ACT GRANT AMOUNTS TO AIRPORTS (pursuant to Paragraphs 2-4) Detailed Listing By State, City And Airport State City Airport Name LOC_ID Grand Totals AK Alaskan Consolidated Airports Multiple [individual airports listed separately] AKAP $16,855,355 AK Adak (Naval) Station/Mitchell Field Adak ADK $30,000 AK Akhiok Akhiok AKK $20,000 AK Akiachak Akiachak Z13 $30,000 AK Akiak Akiak AKI $30,000 AK Akutan Akutan 7AK $20,000 AK Akutan Akutan KQA $20,000 AK Alakanuk Alakanuk AUK $30,000 AK Allakaket Allakaket 6A8 $20,000 AK Ambler Ambler AFM $30,000 AK Anaktuvuk Pass Anaktuvuk Pass AKP $30,000 AK Anchorage Lake Hood LHD $1,053,070 AK Anchorage Merrill Field MRI $17,898,468 AK Anchorage Ted Stevens Anchorage International ANC $26,376,060 AK Anchorage (Borough) Goose Bay Z40 $1,000 AK Angoon Angoon AGN $20,000 AK Aniak Aniak ANI $1,052,884 AK Aniak (Census Subarea) Togiak TOG $20,000 AK Aniak (Census Subarea) Twin Hills A63 $20,000 AK Anvik Anvik ANV $20,000 AK Arctic Village Arctic Village ARC $20,000 AK Atka Atka AKA $20,000 AK Atmautluak Atmautluak 4A2 $30,000 AK Atqasuk Atqasuk Edward Burnell Sr Memorial ATK $20,000 AK Barrow Wiley Post-Will Rogers Memorial BRW $1,191,121 AK Barrow (County) Wainwright AWI $30,000 AK Beaver Beaver WBQ $20,000 AK Bethel Bethel BET $2,271,355 AK Bettles Bettles BTT $20,000 AK Big Lake Big Lake BGQ $30,000 AK Birch Creek Birch Creek Z91 $20,000 AK Birchwood Birchwood BCV $30,000 AK Boundary Boundary BYA $20,000 AK Brevig Mission Brevig Mission KTS $30,000 AK Bristol Bay (Borough) Aleknagik /New 5A8 $20,000 AK
    [Show full text]
  • Director's Corner
    Summer Issue 2021 Director’s Corner Pg. 1 & 2 TSF Update Pg. 2 Gift Shop News Pg. 3 Hollywood & Ft. Rucker MUSEUM GIFT SHOP HOURS WEBSITE Pg. 4 & 5 Foundation Update Pg. 6 MONDAY - FRIDAY 9 - 4 MONDAY - FRIDAY Summer 2021 Pg. 7 SATURDAY 9 - 3 9 - 4 Membership Pg. 7 CLOSED FEDERAL HOLIDAYS. SATURDAY OPEN MEMORIAL DAY, 9 - 2:45 INDEPENDENCE DAY AND VETERANS DAY WWW.ARMYAVIATIONMUSEUM.ORG GIFT SHOP - CLICK ‘SHOP’ DIRECTOR’S CORNER Bob Mitchell, Museum Director reetings once again from the Army Aviation Museum! As we enter the summer season and the country opens back up, we are gearing up for a Army Aviation Museum Foundation G busy season. I noticed an unusually high volume of traffic on the interstate over the P.O. Box 620610 weekend and realized folks are eager to travel, visit family and trying to put 2020 in the Fort Rucker, AL 36362 rear view mirror. All this is good news for museums as well as others that count on attendance. This past Sunday, June 6th marked the anniversary of the D-Day landing, but it was also the 79th anniversary of the birth of Organic Army Aviation. General Order number 98 was signed giving the Ground Forces their own aircraft, pilots and mechanics as part of their Tables of Organization and Equipment (TO&E). Each Artillery unit would be authorized two aircraft, two pilots and one mechanic. These crews would travel and live with the unit in the field and provide reconnaissance, target spotting, medical evacuation and a host of other services.
    [Show full text]
  • Mobility Matters Throughout Our Lives. 2040 Regional Transportation Plan PAG and Regional Transportation Planning PAG and Regional Transportation Planning
    Adopted July 1, 2010 Mobility matters throughout our lives. 2040 Regional Transportation Plan PAG and Regional Transportation Planning PAG and Regional Transportation Planning Pima Association of Governments (PAG) is a nonprofit metropolitan planning organization (MPO) for the Pima County region. PAG’s planning area covers Pima County, a total area of 9,189 square miles, which is larger than some states. PAG is governed by a nine-member Regional Council with an elected official serving from each member jurisdiction, including the Cities of South Tucson and Tucson, Pima County, the Towns of Marana, Oro Valley and Sahuarita, the Pascua Yaqui Tribe, the Tohono O’odham Nation and the Arizona State Transportation Board. PAG’s mission is to help promote good decision making for the region by providing accurate data and encouraging consensus among its members and the public. PAG’s programs focus on cross-jurisdictional planning issues, such as air quality, water quality, population growth and transportation. One of PAG’s primary responsibilities as the MPO is to coordinate the development of the long-range regional transportation plan. This long-range plan represents the work of the regional community; input was provided by all the jurisdictions, many interest group representatives and the public at large. The 2040 RTP presents the collective vision for the transportation network for the next 30 years. PAG provides staff support for the Regional Transportation Authority (RTA), a government entity that manages the $2.1 billion, 20-year RTA plan, which was approved by Pima County voters on May 16, 2006. The RTA is governed by a nine-member board, which includes the same representatives who serve on the PAG Regional Council.
    [Show full text]
  • 3D Terrain Virtual Databases
    3D Terrain Virtual Databases MetaVR Continental US Plus Alaska and Hawaii (CONUS++) 3D Terrain MetaVR Africa, Asia, Australia & Oceania, Europe, North America, and South America 3D Terrain © 2018 MetaVR, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Virtual Reality Scene Generator, VRSG, and Metadesic are trademarks of MetaVR, Inc. Esri and ArcGIS are registered trademarks of Esri. Virtual Kismayo, Somalia Kismayo, Somalia Terrain Specifications Imagery coverage = 50 cm per-pixel Digital Globe (GeoEye-1) satellite imagery covering 1,017 sq km of the southern Somalia port city and are blended into 15 meters-per-pixel (mpp) natural view imagery Elevation coverage = SRTM void filled elevation source data. Cultural features MetaVR’s terrain is populated with hundreds of geographically specific culture models built from ground-level photographs taken on the streets of Kismayo. In addition to these geolocated and photographically specific models of buildings and other structures, several hundred other buildings were modeled by matching the structural footprints visible in the imagery as geographically typical models with culturally and architecturally accurate details. MetaVR’s virtual city contains varied terrain representative of important training environments, from a built-up port to dense urban streets to a sparsely populated outer region that includes a commercial airport. Virtual Afghanistan Village Imagery coverage The overall imagery resolution of the virtual terrain of the whole country is 2.5 meters per pixel. The terrain, built Cultural features with MetaVR’s Terrain Tools for Esri® ArcGIS®, includes an area of 1,120 sq. km of 60 cm Digital Globe commercial The village area has approximately 520 custom-built 3D structures that match the building satellite source imagery and 90 meter elevation posts.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft EA for Inntegrated Pest Management Plan
    July 2018 Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact for the Implementation of an Integrated Pest Management Plan at Fort Rucker, Alabama Prepared For: US Army Garrison Fort Rucker Directorate of Public Works Environmental Division Ft Rucker, AL 36362 Prepared By: 501 Forest Circle Troy, AL 36081 Project No. 18-FR002 PO # 241362 Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact for the Implementation of an Integrated Pest Management Plan at Fort Rucker, Alabama REVIEWED BY: LEIGH M. JAHNKE Date Environmental Coordinator Fort Rucker, Alabama ALFRED T. TOWNSEND Date Chief, Environmental and Natural Resources Division Fort Rucker, Alabama EDWIN P. JANASKY Date Director, Public Works Fort Rucker, Alabama Trevor Hanzell, CPT, JA Date Office of Staff Judge Advocate Fort Rucker, Alabama James K. Hughes, Jr. Date Public Affairs Officer Fort Rucker, Alabama Table of Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations 3 Executive Summary 5 Purpose and Need 5 Proposed Action 5 No Action Alternative 6 Summary of Environmental Consequences 6 1 Purpose, Need, and Scope 10 1.1 Introduction 10 1.2 Purpose and Need 10 1.3 Scope 11 1.4 Public and Agency Involvement 11 1.4.1 Public Review of the Final EA and Draft FNSI 11 1.4.2 Native American 12 Consultation/Coordination 1.5 Regulatory Framework 13 2 Description of Proposed Action and 13 Alternatives 2.1 Proposed Action 13 2.2 No Action Alternative 14 2.3 Alternatives Considered but Not Carried 14 Forward 3 Affected Environment and Consequences 14 3.1 Resources Eliminated from Further 15
    [Show full text]
  • Rio Vista Airport Pavement Management Plan, Drainage Assessment, and Electrical Plan
    Statement of Qualifications for Rio Vista Airport Pavement Management Plan, Drainage Assessment, and Electrical Plan Prepared for City of Rio Vista Prepared by Statement of Qualifications for RioRio VVistaista AAirportp Pavement Management Plan, DrainageiA AsseAssessment,ssment,ment,nt, and Electrical Plan July 22, 2010 765 The City Drive Suite 400 Mr. John Andoh Orange, California Transit & Airport Coordinator 92868 City of Rio Vista TEL 714 939 1030 FAX 714 938 9488 One Main Street Rio Vista, CA 94571 Re: Statement of Interest and Qualifications for Professional Airport Engineering Design and Planning Services for the City of Rio Vista and the Rio Vista Municipal Airport Dear Mr. Andoh: The City of Rio Vista is looking for the most qualified airport consultant to work with the City to improve the Rio Vista Municipal Airport. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (Kimley-Horn) is that firm. We believe that Kimley-Horn is the right choice for the City based on the following: History of Stability and Strong California Presence. Kimley-Horn is an employee owned, national firm. Since its inception in 1967, our firm has never been sold or acquired, or merged with other entities. Furthermore, we are ranked in the top 20 national aviation firms by ENR, have been ranked No.1 firm to work for by CE News several times, and are in the top 100 companies to work for by Fortune. Kimley-Horn is stable. We are consistent and we’re not going anywhere. We are confident that the people and the company you see in California today will be the people and company you see for the life of your projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Department of Veterans' Services DIRECTORY
    Arizona Department of Veterans’ Services DIRECTORY November 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS INFORMATION UPDATE FORM FOR VETERANS’ ORGANIZATIONS………. 3 ARIZONA VETERANS’ SERVICE ADVISORY COMMISSION…………………. 4 MEDAL OF HONOR RECIPENTS ― ARIZONA…………………………………….. 5 NATIONAL SERVICE OFFICERS ― ARIZONA……………………………………… 7 AZDVS VETERAN BENEFITS COUNSELORS (VBC’s)………………………… 9 VETERAN SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS; ARIZONA SERVICE OFFICERS…. 10 OTHER VETERANS’ SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS……………………….…… 21 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS………………………………..... 33 ARIZONA VA MEDICAL CENTERS………………………………………………. 33 COMMUNITY BASED OUTPATIENT CLINICS (CBOC’s)……………………… 34 VETERAN CENTERS; VA CEMETERY ― ARIZONA….………………………... 37 OTHER FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES AND ORGANIZATIONS ― AZ……..… 37 ARIZONA MILITARY INSTALLATIONS…………………………………………... 44 MILITARY DEPT. OF FINANCE & RETIREE ASSISTANCE…………………… 47 ARIZONA U.S. CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION……………………………... 49 ARIZONA EXECUTIVE OFFICIALS………………………………………………. 52 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE DIRECTORS OF VETERANS’ AFFAIRS (NASDVA)…………………………………………………… 54 STATE VETERAN HOMES WITHIN THE U.S…………………………………… 63 2 INFORMATION UPDATE FORM FOR VETERANS’ ORGANIZATIONS When there are changes or corrections required, organizations should complete this form and submit it to the following address: Mail to: Arizona Dept. of Veterans’ Services Corrections or Updates: ATTN: Office of the Director Information may be phoned in: 3839 North 3rd Street, Suite 200 Telephone: (602) 234-8406 Phoenix, AZ 85012 Facsimile: (602) 255-1038 E-mail to: [email protected] FROM: ORGANIZATION
    [Show full text]