DOCSLIB.ORG

Comparative Primate Neuroimaging: Insights Into Human Brain Evolution

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Comparative Primate Neuroimaging: Insights Into Human Brain Evolution Review Comparative primate neuroimaging: insights into human brain evolution 1,2,3,4 James K. Rilling 1 Department of Anthropology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA 2 Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA 3 Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA 4 Center for Translational Social Neuroscience, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA Comparative neuroimaging can identify unique features We have extensive knowledge of rhesus macaque brain of the human brain and teach us about human brain anatomy and physiology obtained through lesion studies, evolution. Comparisons with chimpanzees, our closest single-cell electrophysiology, and tracer studies. Similar living primate relative, are critical in this endeavor. detailed knowledge from humans and great apes is highly Structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been desirable, but these invasive methods cannot be ethically used to compare brain size development, brain structure applied in humans and great apes. Fortunately, the recent proportions and brain aging. Positron emission tomog- advent of non-invasive neuroimaging techniques has raphy (PET) imaging has been used to compare resting opened new possibilities for comparative studies (Box 2) brain glucose metabolism. Functional MRI (fMRI) has [2]. been used to compare auditory and visual system path- ways, as well as resting-state networks of connectivity. Structural MRI Finally, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) has been used The earliest comparative neuroimaging studies utilized to compare structural connectivity. Collectively, these structural MRI to compare the absolute and relative size methods have revealed human brain specializations of brain structures across anthropoid primate species. with respect to development, cortical organization, con- Similar studies had been conducted earlier using post- nectivity, and aging. These findings inform our knowl- mortem brain specimens [6–8], but MRI offered the advan- edge of the evolutionary changes responsible for the tage that data could be rapidly collected from living, special features of the modern human mind. healthy, nonelderly adult subjects without sacrificing ani- mals or waiting for them to die. This facilitated collection of The importance of comparative primate neuroimaging larger within-species sample sizes that permitted formal In the quest for a scientific understanding of human na- statistical tests of between-species differences. Another ture, no topic is more important than the evolution of the important advantage of MRI is that brain structure special features of the human brain [1,2]. The fossil record volumes do not need to be corrected for shrinkage that shows that brain size approximately tripled over the last occurs during the post-mortem fixation process [9]. 2.5 million years of human evolution [3]; however, the fossil Against the backdrop of evidence that brain structure record cannot identify potential evolutionary changes to size could be accurately predicted from overall brain size the internal organization of the brain [4]. To investigate across a broad sample of mammals [10], early MRI findings this question, we must turn to the comparative study of the showed that human brains in fact deviated from predic- brains of living primate species. If we can identify a tions derived from non-human anthropoid primates in characteristic of the human brain that is not found in some important respects, and could not simply be consid- the brain of any closely related primate species, then we ered scaled-up versions of typical non-human primate can infer that the trait evolved in the hominin lineage (see brains [11]. In particular, relative to a hypothetical ‘typical’ Glossary) after we diverged from our common ancestor anthropoid primate of our brain size, humans have larger with chimpanzees some 5–7 million years ago (mya). This approach renders the study of chimpanzees crucial for learning about human brain evolution: we cannot infer Glossary that a trait uniquely evolved in the human lineage unless it Allometry: study of how one part of an organism grows either in relation to the is absent in modern chimpanzees (Box 1) [5]. whole organism or to some other part. Many allometric relationships are well a described by the equation Y = bX , where a is the allometry exponent. When a = 1, the relationship is linear. When a > 1, increases in Y outpace increases in Corresponding author: Rilling, J.K. ([email protected]). X and the relationship is positively allometric. When a < 1, increases in Y do Keywords: neuroimaging; evolution; comparative; human; chimpanzee. not keep pace with increases in X and the relationship is negatively allometric. 1364-6613/$ – see front matter Hominin: living and extinct members of the human lineage after the split from ß 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.013 chimpanzees. Homology: correspondence between species due to a common evolutionary origin. Voxel: the smallest volumetric element of a brain image, analogous to a pixel, but with the added dimension of depth. 46 Trends in Cognitive Sciences, January 2014, Vol. 18, No. 1 Review Trends in Cognitive Sciences January 2014, Vol. 18, No. 1 Box 1. Primate phylogeny Box 2. Neuroimaging techniques In taxonomic terms, primates are one of several orders in the MRI can be used to image either brain structure or brain function mammalian class. The earliest primates appear in the fossil record using the same instrument. In MRI, the subject is positioned within around 60 million years ago (mya), shortly after the dinosaurs the bore of a large magnet that exposes them to a strong magnetic became extinct. The two primate suborders, anthropoids and field, which causes a small fraction of the protons in their body to prosimians, diverged from each other early in primate evolution. orient in the direction of that magnetic field. If radiofrequency pulses Modern day prosimians are generally believed to have retained are then applied at the precession frequency of these protons, they more similarities with the earliest ancestral primates than anthro- are tipped out of alignment with the main magnetic field. The signal poid primates have. Anthropoid primates include New World intensity of voxels in MRI images is related to the behavior of the monkeys (from central and south America), Old World monkeys protons following this perturbation. This can be affected by (i) the (from Africa and Asia), and the hominoids, which include lesser water and fat content of tissues, (ii) the direction of water diffusion, apes (from Asia), great apes (from Africa and Asia), and humans. and (iii) the ratio of deoxygenated to oxygenated hemoglobin. Among the hominoids, humans are most distantly related to the These variables can be used, respectively, to create images that lesser apes, and most closely related to the African great apes. Our show (i) contrast between gray matter, white matter, and cere- two closest living primate relatives are the chimpanzees and the brospinal fluid (structural images for morphometrics), (ii) images of bonobos, both members of the genus Pan, with whom we shared a water diffusion (DWI images for measuring white matter integrity common ancestor some 5–7 mya. Chimpanzees and bonobos are and tractography), and (iii) increases in blood flow in response to believed to have shared their last common ancestor approximately stimuli (fMRI). 1–2 mya. To conclude that a neurobiological trait is uniquely human, PET involves the injection or consumption of radioactive com- we would ideally show that it is not present in any other living pounds, followed by detection of the distribution and concentration species. However, given the practical difficulty of doing so, the of radioactivity in the brain with an instrument known as a PET minimum criterion for suggesting that a trait uniquely evolved in scanner. PET can be used to measure cerebral glucose metabolism humans is to establish its absence in our closest living relative, and cerebral blood flow, both known correlates of synaptic activity either chimpanzees or bonobos, as well as in some more distantly in the brain. PET can also be used to image the density and related primate species that serves as an outgroup, to determine distribution of neurotransmitter receptors and transporters in the whether a difference between chimpanzees and humans represents brain. This involves injection of a radioactively labeled molecule that a chimpanzee or a human specialization. However, this more limited binds to a specific receptor (i.e., a ligand), followed by detection of approach leaves open the possibility of parallel evolution of the the location and intensity of the radioactivity. A great deal of human trait in a particular primate or even non-primate species. research is devoted to synthesizing radiolabeled ligands that have the appropriate binding characteristics in terms of their specificity and affinity for their receptors. Ligands are currently available for several subtypes of dopamine and serotonin receptors, as well as neocortices [9], temporal lobe volume [12,13], and estimat- their transporters. The number of available ligands will continue to ed prefrontal white matter volume [14], as well as greater grow in the future. All of these techniques are available for comparative neuroima- gyrification (cortical folding) in prefrontal cortex [9] and ging studies that teach us about human brain evolution. more
Load more

Recommended publications
  • EAZA Best Practice Guidelines Bonobo (Pan Paniscus)
    EAZA Best Practice Guidelines Bonobo (Pan paniscus) Editors: Dr Jeroen Stevens Contact information: Royal Zoological Society of Antwerp – K. Astridplein 26 – B 2018 Antwerp, Belgium Email: [email protected] Name of TAG: Great Ape TAG TAG Chair: Dr. María Teresa Abelló Poveda – Barcelona Zoo [email protected] Edition: First edition - 2020 1 2 EAZA Best Practice Guidelines disclaimer Copyright (February 2020) by EAZA Executive Office, Amsterdam. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in hard copy, machine-readable or other forms without advance written permission from the European Association of Zoos and Aquaria (EAZA). Members of the European Association of Zoos and Aquaria (EAZA) may copy this information for their own use as needed. The information contained in these EAZA Best Practice Guidelines has been obtained from numerous sources believed to be reliable. EAZA and the EAZA APE TAG make a diligent effort to provide a complete and accurate representation of the data in its reports, publications, and services. However, EAZA does not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy, or completeness of any information. EAZA disclaims all liability for errors or omissions that may exist and shall not be liable for any incidental, consequential, or other damages (whether resulting from negligence or otherwise) including, without limitation, exemplary damages or lost profits arising out of or in connection with the use of this publication. Because the technical information provided in the EAZA Best Practice Guidelines can easily be misread or misinterpreted unless properly analysed, EAZA strongly recommends that users of this information consult with the editors in all matters related to data analysis and interpretation.
    [Show full text]
  • Altriciality and the Evolution of Toe Orientation in Birds
    Evol Biol DOI 10.1007/s11692-015-9334-7 SYNTHESIS PAPER Altriciality and the Evolution of Toe Orientation in Birds 1 1 1 Joa˜o Francisco Botelho • Daniel Smith-Paredes • Alexander O. Vargas Received: 3 November 2014 / Accepted: 18 June 2015 Ó Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015 Abstract Specialized morphologies of bird feet have trees, to swim under and above the water surface, to hunt and evolved several times independently as different groups have fish, and to walk in the mud and over aquatic vegetation, become zygodactyl, semi-zygodactyl, heterodactyl, pam- among other abilities. Toe orientations in the foot can be prodactyl or syndactyl. Birds have also convergently described in six main types: Anisodactyl feet have digit II evolved similar modes of development, in a spectrum that (dII), digit III (dIII) and digit IV (dIV) pointing forward and goes from precocial to altricial. Using the new context pro- digit I (dI) pointing backward. From the basal anisodactyl vided by recent molecular phylogenies, we compared the condition four feet types have arisen by modifications in the evolution of foot morphology and modes of development orientation of digits. Zygodactyl feet have dI and dIV ori- among extant avian families. Variations in the arrangement ented backward and dII and dIII oriented forward, a condi- of toes with respect to the anisodactyl ancestral condition tion similar to heterodactyl feet, which have dI and dII have occurred only in altricial groups. Those groups repre- oriented backward and dIII and dIV oriented forward. Semi- sent four independent events of super-altriciality and many zygodactyl birds can assume a facultative zygodactyl or independent transformations of toe arrangements (at least almost zygodactyl orientation.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal for Inclusion of the Chimpanzee
    CMS Distribution: General CONVENTION ON MIGRATORY UNEP/CMS/COP12/Doc.25.1.1 25 May 2017 SPECIES Original: English 12th MEETING OF THE CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES Manila, Philippines, 23 - 28 October 2017 Agenda Item 25.1 PROPOSAL FOR THE INCLUSION OF THE CHIMPANZEE (Pan troglodytes) ON APPENDIX I AND II OF THE CONVENTION Summary: The Governments of Congo and the United Republic of Tanzania have jointly submitted the attached proposal* for the inclusion of the Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) on Appendix I and II of CMS. *The geographical designations employed in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the CMS Secretariat (or the United Nations Environment Programme) concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The responsibility for the contents of the document rests exclusively with its author. UNEP/CMS/COP12/Doc.25.1.1 PROPOSAL FOR THE INCLUSION OF CHIMPANZEE (Pan troglodytes) ON APPENDICES I AND II OF THE CONVENTION ON THE CONSERVATION OF MIGRATORY SPECIES OF WILD ANIMALS A: PROPOSAL Inclusion of Pan troglodytes in Appendix I and II of the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals. B: PROPONENTS: Congo and the United Republic of Tanzania C: SUPPORTING STATEMENT 1. Taxonomy 1.1 Class: Mammalia 1.2 Order: Primates 1.3 Family: Hominidae 1.4 Genus, species or subspecies, including author and year: Pan troglodytes (Blumenbach 1775) (Wilson & Reeder 2005) [Note: Pan troglodytes is understood in the sense of Wilson and Reeder (2005), the current reference for terrestrial mammals used by CMS).
    [Show full text]
  • Predictors of Juvenile Survival in Birds
    Ornithological Monographs Volume (2013), No. 78, 1–55 © The American Ornithologists’ Union, 2013. Printed in USA. PREDICTORS OF JUVENILE SURVIVAL IN BIRDS TERRI J. MANESS1,2,3 AND DAVID J. ANDERSON2 1School of Biological Sciences, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, Louisiana 71272, USA; and 2Department of Biology, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27106, USA ABSTRACT.—The survival probability of birds during the juvenile period, between the end of parental care and adulthood, is highly variable and has a major effect on population dynamics and parental fitness. As such, a large number of studies have attempted to evaluate potential predictors of juvenile survival in birds, especially predictors related to parental care. Lack’s hypothesis linking body reserves accumulated from parental care to the survival of naive juveniles has organized much of this research, but various other predictors have also been investigated and received some support. We reviewed the literature in this area and identified a variety of methodological problems that obscure interpretation of the body of results. Most studies adopted statistical techniques that missed the opportunities to (1) evaluate the relative importance of several predictors, (2) control the confounding effect of correlation among predictor variables, and (3) exploit the information content of collinearity by evaluating indirect (via correlation) as well as direct effects of potential predictors on juvenile survival. Ultimately, we concluded that too few reliable studies exist to allow robust evaluations of any hypothesis regarding juvenile survival in birds. We used path analysis to test potential predictors of juvenile survival of 2,631 offspring from seven annual cohorts of a seabird, the Nazca Booby (Sula granti).
    [Show full text]
  • 8. Primate Evolution
    8. Primate Evolution Jonathan M. G. Perry, Ph.D., The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Stephanie L. Canington, B.A., The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Learning Objectives • Understand the major trends in primate evolution from the origin of primates to the origin of our own species • Learn about primate adaptations and how they characterize major primate groups • Discuss the kinds of evidence that anthropologists use to find out how extinct primates are related to each other and to living primates • Recognize how the changing geography and climate of Earth have influenced where and when primates have thrived or gone extinct The first fifty million years of primate evolution was a series of adaptive radiations leading to the diversification of the earliest lemurs, monkeys, and apes. The primate story begins in the canopy and understory of conifer-dominated forests, with our small, furtive ancestors subsisting at night, beneath the notice of day-active dinosaurs. From the archaic plesiadapiforms (archaic primates) to the earliest groups of true primates (euprimates), the origin of our own order is characterized by the struggle for new food sources and microhabitats in the arboreal setting. Climate change forced major extinctions as the northern continents became increasingly dry, cold, and seasonal and as tropical rainforests gave way to deciduous forests, woodlands, and eventually grasslands. Lemurs, lorises, and tarsiers—once diverse groups containing many species—became rare, except for lemurs in Madagascar where there were no anthropoid competitors and perhaps few predators. Meanwhile, anthropoids (monkeys and apes) emerged in the Old World, then dispersed across parts of the northern hemisphere, Africa, and ultimately South America.
    [Show full text]
  • The Platypus Is Not a Rodent: DNA Hybridization, Amniote Phylogeny and the Palimpsest Theory
    The platypus is not a rodent: DNA hybridization, amniote phylogeny and the palimpsest theory John A. W. Kirsch1* and Gregory C. Mayer1,2 1The University of Wisconsin Zoological Museum, 250 North Mills Street, Madison,WI 53706, USA 2Department of Biological Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Kenosha,WI 53141, USA We present DNA-hybridization data on 21 amniotes and two anurans showing that discrimination is obtained among most of these at the class and lower levels. Trees generated from these data largely agree with conventional views, for example in not associating birds and mammals. However, the sister relation- ships found here of the monotremes to marsupials, and of turtles to the alligator, are surprising results which are nonetheless consistent with the results of some other studies. The Marsupionta hypothesis of Gregory is reviewed, as are opinions about the placement of chelonians. Anatomical and reproductive data considered by Gregory do not unequivocally preclude a marsupial^monotreme special relationship, and there is other recent evidence for placing turtles within the Diapsida. We conclude that the evidential meaning of the molecular data is as shown in the trees, but that the topologies may be in£uenced by a base- compositional bias producing a seemingly slow evolutionary rate in monotremes, or by algorithmic artefacts (in the case of turtles as well). Keywords: Chelonia; Crocodilia; Eutheria; Marsupialia; Marsupionta; molecular evolution `Unyielding factualists have so set the style in taxonomy relationships continue to be debated, `everyone knows' and morphology that, if their assertions were accepted, that the latter result cannot be correct. hardly any known type of animal could possibly have The orthodox view of the phylogeny of mammals been derived even from any known past group.' regards monotremes (the living `Prototheria') as the Gregory (1947, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammalian Organogenesis in Deep Time: Tools for Teaching and Outreach Marcelo R
    Sánchez‑Villagra and Werneburg Evo Edu Outreach (2016) 9:11 DOI 10.1186/s12052-016-0062-y REVIEW Open Access Mammalian organogenesis in deep time: tools for teaching and outreach Marcelo R. Sánchez‑Villagra1 and Ingmar Werneburg1,2,3,4* Abstract Mammals constitute a rich subject of study on evolution and development and provide model organisms for experi‑ mental investigations. They can serve to illustrate how ontogeny and phylogeny can be studied together and how the reconstruction of ancestors of our own evolutionary lineage can be approached. Likewise, mammals can be used to promote ’tree thinking’ and can provide an organismal appreciation of evolutionary changes. This subject is suitable for the classroom and to the public at large given the interest and familiarity of people with mammals and their closest relatives. We present a simple exercise in which embryonic development is presented as a transforma‑ tive process that can be observed, compared, and analyzed. In addition, we provide and discuss a freely available animation on organogenesis and life history evolution in mammals. An evolutionary tree can be the best tool to order and understand those transformations for different species. A simple exercise introduces the subject of changes in developmental timing or heterochrony and its importance in evolution. The developmental perspective is relevant in teaching and outreach efforts for the understanding of evolutionary theory today. Keywords: Development, Ontogeny, Embryology, Phylogeny, Heterochrony, Recapitulation, Placentalia, Human Background (Gilbert 2013), followed by the growth process. In pla- Mammals are a diverse group in which to examine devel- cental mammals, organogenesis takes place mostly in the opment and evolution, and besides the mouse and the rat uterus, whereas in monotremes and marsupials a very used in biomedical research, provide subjects based on immature hatchling or newborn, respectively, develops which experimental (Harjunmaa et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Human-Nonhuman Primate Interconnections and Their Relevance to Anthropology
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Ecological and Environmental Anthropology Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center (University of Georgia) for November 2006 Human-Nonhuman Primate Interconnections and Their Relevance to Anthropology Agustin Fuentes University of Notre Dame Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdmeea Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons Fuentes, Agustin, "Human-Nonhuman Primate Interconnections and Their Relevance to Anthropology" (2006). Ecological and Environmental Anthropology (University of Georgia). 1. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdmeea/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Ecological and Environmental Anthropology (University of Georgia) by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Vol. 2, No. 2 Ecological and Environmental Anthropology 2006 Articles Human-Nonhuman Primate Interconnections and Their Relevance to Anthropology Agustín Fuentes The human-nonhuman primate interface is a core component in conservation and an emerging area of discourse across anthropology. There is a growing recognition of the relevance of long-term sympatry between human and nonhuman primates. Until recently these relationships received limited attention in the anthropological literature and in the primatological construction of models for the behavior and evolution of primate societies. Most socioecological investigations into primate groups and human populations do not incorporate their interactions (beyond predation or crop raiding), potential pathogen sharing, or the role of the anthropogenically impacted environment. Current relationships between humans and nonhuman primates are generally assumed to be rooted in conflict over land use and relatively recent, and thus have limited evolutionary and long term ecological impact.
    [Show full text]
  • Primate Conservation
    Primate Conservation Global evidence for the effects of interventions Jessica Junker, Hjalmar S. Kühl, Lisa Orth, Rebecca K. Smith, Silviu O. Petrovan and William J. Sutherland Synopses of Conservation Evidence ii © 2017 William J. Sutherland This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). This license allows you to share, copy, distribute and transmit the work; to adapt the work and to make commercial use of the work providing attribution is made to the authors (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Attribution should include the following information: Junker, J., Kühl, H.S., Orth, L., Smith, R.K., Petrovan, S.O. and Sutherland, W.J. (2017) Primate conservation: Global evidence for the effects of interventions. University of Cambridge, UK Further details about CC BY licenses are available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Cover image: Martha Robbins/MPI-EVAN Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, Uganda Digital material and resources associated with this synopsis are available at https://www.conservationevidence.com/ iii Contents About this book ............................................................................................................................. xiii 1. Threat: Residential and commercial development ............................ 1 Key messages ........................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1. Remove and relocate ‘problem’
    [Show full text]
  • Ancestral Facial Morphology of Old World Higher Primates (Anthropoidea/Catarrhini/Miocene/Cranium/Anatomy) BRENDA R
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 88, pp. 5267-5271, June 1991 Evolution Ancestral facial morphology of Old World higher primates (Anthropoidea/Catarrhini/Miocene/cranium/anatomy) BRENDA R. BENEFIT* AND MONTE L. MCCROSSINt *Department of Anthropology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901; and tDepartment of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 Communicated by F. Clark Howell, March 11, 1991 ABSTRACT Fossil remains of the cercopithecoid Victoia- (1, 5, 6). Contrasting craniofacial configurations of cercopithe- pithecus recently recovered from middle Miocene deposits of cines and great apes are, in consequence, held to be indepen- Maboko Island (Kenya) provide evidence ofthe cranial anatomy dently derived with regard to the ancestral catarrhine condition of Old World monkeys prior to the evolutionary divergence of (1, 5, 6). This reconstruction has formed the basis of influential the extant subfamilies Colobinae and Cercopithecinae. Victoria- cladistic assessments ofthe phylogenetic relationships between pithecus shares a suite ofcraniofacial features with the Oligocene extant and extinct catarrhines (1, 2). catarrhine Aegyptopithecus and early Miocene hominoid Afro- Reconstructions of the ancestral catarrhine morphotype pithecus. AU three genera manifest supraorbital costae, anteri- are based on commonalities of subordinate morphotypes for orly convergent temporal lines, the absence of a postglabellar Cercopithecoidea and Hominoidea (1, 5, 6). Broadly distrib- fossa, a moderate to long snout, great facial
    [Show full text]
  • Lemurs, Monkeys & Apes, Oh
    Lemurs, Monkeys & Apes, Oh My! Audience Activity is designed for ages 12 and up Goal Students will be able to understand the differences between primate groups Objective • To use critical thinking skills to identify different primate groups • To learn what makes primates so unique. Conservation Message Many of the world’s primates live in habitats that are currently being threatened by human activities. Most of these species live in rainforests in Asia, South America and Africa, all these places share a similar threat; unstainable agriculture and climate change. In the last 20 years, chimpanzee and ring-tailed lemur populations have declined by 90%. There are some easy things we can do to help these animals! Buying sustainable wood and paper products, recycling any items you can, spreading the word about the issues and supporting local zoos and aquariums. Background Information There are over 300 species of primates. Primates are an extremely diverse group of animals and cover everything from marmosets to lorises to gorillas and chimpanzees. Many people believe that all primates are monkeys, however, this is incorrect. There are many differences between primate species. Primates are broken into prosimians (lemurs, tarsius, bushbabies and lorises), monkeys (Old and New World) and apes (gibbons, orangutans, gorillas, chimpanzees, bonobos). Prosimians are primarily tree-dwellers. This group includes species such as lemurs, tarsius, bushbabies and lorises. They have longer snouts than other primates, a wet nose and a good sense of smell. They have smaller brains, large eyes that are adapted for night vision, and long tails that are not prehensile, meaning they are not able to grab onto items with their tails.
    [Show full text]
  • Martin Pj Edwardes an Anthropological Perspective
    The Origins of Self explores the role that selfhood plays in defining human society, and each human individual in that society. It considers the genetic and cultural origins of self, the role that self plays in socialisation and language, and the types of self we generate in our individual journeys to and through adulthood. Edwardes argues that other awareness is a relatively early evolutionary development, present throughout the primate clade and perhaps beyond, but self-awareness is a product of the sharing of social models, something only humans appear to do. The self of which we are aware is not something innate within us, it is a model of our self produced as a response to the models of us offered to us by other people. Edwardes proposes that human construction of selfhood involves seven different types of self. All but one of them are internally generated models, and the only non-model, the actual self, is completely hidden from conscious awareness. We rely on others to tell us about our self, and even to let us know we are a self. Developed in relation to a range of subject areas – linguistics, anthropology, genomics and cognition, as well as socio-cultural theory – The Origins of Self is of particular interest to MARTIN P. J. EDWARDES students and researchers studying the origins of language, human origins in general, and the cognitive differences between human and other animal psychologies. Martin P. J. Edwardes is a visiting lecturer at King’s College London. He is currently teaching modules on Language Origins and Language Construction.
    [Show full text]