The Civil Service Reforms of the 1980S

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Civil Service Reforms of the 1980S The Civil Service Reforms of the 1980s edited by Dr Michael Kandiah & Professor Rodney Lowe CCBH Oral History Programme 2 The Civil Service Reforms of the 1980s © Centre for Contemporary British History, 2007. Not to be reproduced without permission. The Civil Service Reforms of the 1980s CCBH Oral History Programme Programme Director: Dr Michael D. Kandiah © Centre for Contemporary British History, 2007 Cartoon on title page from Campaign Report 9, 11 June 1981, The Council of Civil Service Unions All rights reserved. This material is made available for use for personal research and study. We give per- mission for the entire files to be downloaded to your computer for such personal use only. For reproduction or further distribution of all or part of the file (except as constitutes fair dealing), permission must be sought from CCBH. Published by Centre for Contemporary British History Institute of Historical Research School of Advanced Study University of London Malet St London WC1E 7HU ISBN: 1-905165-30-7 ISBN-13: 978-1-905165-30-8 The Civil Service Reforms of the 1980s Edited by Dr Michael Kandiah and Professor Rodney Lowe Seminar held 17 November 2006 at Churchill College, Cambridge This witness seminar was organised by the Centre for Contemporary British History, the Cabinet Office Histories, Openness and Records Unit and Churchill College Cambridge. It forms part of the official history of the Civil Service being written by Professor Rodney Lowe Centre for Contemporary British History 6 The Civil Service Reforms of the 1980s © Centre for Contemporary British History, 2007. Not to be reproduced without permission. Contents Contributors 9 Citation Guidance 12 Chronology 13 Session I: The 1981 Civil Service Strike Background Notes 17 Seminar Transcript 20 Session II: The demise of the Civil Service Department and the resignation of Sir Ian Bancroft as Head of the Civil Service, November 1981 Background Notes 55 Seminar Transcript 59 Session III: The Genesis and Initial Implementation of Next Steps Background Notes 97 Seminar Transcript 102 Comment by Sir Peter Kemp 143 8 The Civil Service Reforms of the 1980s © Centre for Contemporary British History, 2007. Not to be reproduced without permission. Contributors Editor: MICHAEL D. KANDIAH Director of the Oral History Programme, Centre for Contemporary British History Background notes: PROFESSOR Official Historian of the Civil Service since the Fulton Report RODNEY LOWE Witness details are given for their positions at the time of the events under discussion or other relevant position. Session I The 1981 Civil Service Strike Chair: BRIAN GILMORE, CB Principal, Civil Service College Witnesses: The Rt Hon LORD Cabinet Secretary, 1979-87. ARMSTRONG OF ILMINSTER, GCB, CVO LESLIE CHRISTIE Assistant General Secretary of the Society of Civil and Public Servants LORD CHRISTOPHER CBE General Secretary, Inland Revenue Staff Federation, 1976-89 MIKE FOGDEN Chairman, First Division Association, 1980-3 SIR ALISTAIR GRAHAM, Kt Deputy General Secretary, Civil and Public Service Association, 1982-6 SIR JOHN HERBECQ, KCB Second Permanent Secretary, Civil Service Department, 1975-81 SIR JOHN HOSKYNS, Kt Head, No 10 Policy Unit, 1979-81 The Rt Hon LORD WILSON Deputy Secretary, Cabinet Office, later Cabinet Secretary and OF DINTON, GCB Head of the Civil Service, 1998-2002 10 The Civil Service Reforms of the 1980s Session II The demise of the Civil Service Department and the resig- nation of Sir Ian Bancroft as Head of the Civil Service November 1981 Chair: DR WILLIAM PLOWDEN Director-General, Royal Institute of Public Administration Witnesses: The Rt Hon LORD Cabinet Secretary, 1979-87, Joint Head of the Civil Service ARMSTRONG OF OF ILMINSTER, GCB, CVO The Rt Hon SIR JOHN Principal Private Secretary to Home Secretary, 1978–80; Assist- CHILCOT, GCB, PC ant Under-Secretary of State, Director of Personnel and Finance, Prison Department, 1980–4; Under-Secretary, Cabinet Office (MPO), 1984–6 JEREMY COLMAN Private Secretary to successive heads of the Home Civil Service, 1980–2 SIR JOHN HERBECQ, KCB Second Permanent Secretary, CSD SIR JOHN HOSKYNS, Kt Head, No 10 Policy Unit CLIVE PRIESTLEY, CB Chief of Staff to Derek Rayner, Efficiency Unit, PMO, 1979-83 SIR ADAM RIDLEY, Kt Special Adviser, Treasury, 1979-84 The Rt Hon LORD Minister for Housing, 1987-8, later Head of the Office of Public WALDEGRAVE OF Service and Science, 1992-4 NORTH HILL, PC SIR CLIVE WHITMORE Principal Private Secretary to the Prime Minister, 1979-82 GCB, CVO Session III The Genesis and Initial Implementation of Next Steps Chair: PETER RIDDELL Political Editor, The Times Witnesses: The Rt Hon LORD Cabinet Secretary and Head of the Civil Service, to 31 Dec 1987 ARMSTRONG OF ILMINSTER, GCB, CVO IAN BEESLEY Deputy Head, Unit supporting Lord Rayner (Prime Minister’s Adviser on Efficiency), 1981-3; Under Secretary and Official Head of the Prime Minister’s Efficiency Unit, 1983-6 © Centre for Contemporary British History, 2007. Not to be reproduced without permission. The Civil Service Reforms of the 1980s 11 PROFESSOR PETER Queen Mary, University of London HENNESSY SIR ROBIN IBBS, KBE, Kt Prime Minister’s Adviser on Efficiency and Effectiveness KATHARINE M. JENKINS Head of the Efficiency Unit and joint author of Next Steps SIR PETER KEMP, KCB Second Permanent Secretary and Next Steps Project Manager, OMCS, 1988-92 SIR ROBIN Deputy Secretary, Department of Trade and Industry, 1984-92 MOUNTFIELD, KCB SIR AUGUSTINE (GUS) Cabinet Secretary, 2005- O’DONNELL The Rt Hon LORD Labour Party member of the Treasury and Civil Service Select RADICE, PC Committee, 1987-96 The Rt Hon LORD Minister for Housing, 1987-8, later Head of the Office of Public WALDEGRAVE OF Service and Science, 1992-4 NORTH HILL, PC The Rt Hon LORD WILSON Deputy Secretary, Cabinet Office, later Cabinet Secretary and OF DINTON, GCB Head of the Civil Service, 1998-2002 © Centre for Contemporary British History, 2007. Not to be reproduced without permission. Citation Guidance References to this and other witness seminars should take the following form: Witness name, in ‘Witness Seminar Title’, seminar held [date of seminar], (Centre for Contem- porary British History, [date of publication], [full internet address of seminar]), page number of reference [use the number given in the header at the top of the page referenced]. For example, Lord Armstrong of Ilminster’s comments on civil service morale should be foot- noted as follows: Lord Armstrong of Ilminster, in ‘The Civil Service Reforms of the 1980s: The 1981 Civil Serv- ice Strike’, seminar held 17 November 2006, Centre for Contemporary British History, 2007, http://www.icbh.ac.uk/icbh/witness/civilservicereforms, p.42. For Harvard reference style, use (CCBH Witness Seminar, date of publication) in the text, and the following style in the bibliography: ‘Witness Seminar Title’, held [date of seminar], Centre for Contemporary British History, [date of publication], [full internet address of seminar]. For fuller guidance on the citation of all types of electronic sources, please refer to the H-Net Guide at: http://www2.h-net.msu.edu/about/citation/general.html Chronology 1934 First government agency established, the Unemployment Assistance Board 1935 Feb Ministers suspend UAB benefit scales due to demonstrations and Parliamen- tary pressure 1955 Priestley Commission – pay comparability introduced 1961 Plowden Report: first highlights the importance of management at the centre and ‘down the line’ 1962 First pay pause – public sector only 1968 Fulton Report: attack on the ‘cult of the amateur’ Civil Service Department created 1969 Jan Staging of pay awards In Place of Strife published CPSA becomes first union to adopt a strike policy 1970-4 Creation of departmental agencies under Heath Government: Executive responsibilities ‘hived off ’ to agencies e.g. CAA (1971) as well as creation of departmental agencies e.g. Defence Procurement Agency (1971) and PSA (1972). Labour government continues trend towards hiving-off e.g. MSC (1974) which assumed responsibility for Training and Employment Services Agencies 1971 CPSA establishes a fighting fund 1972 Union refusal to process pension award Industrial Relations Act 1973 Feb One day strike (CPSA, SCS, C&E) 1974 Development by CSD/Treasury of financial information system 1976 Pay Research suspended (until 1978) 1977 Jan Creation of Bureau of the Budget out of Treasury narrowly defeated Jul English Committee recommends closure of CSD 1979 Lord Rayner heads Efficiency Unit, situated in No 10 ‘Lasting reforms’ programme seeks improved management through changes in administrative culture and constitutional framework Feb One day strike Apr Settlement (9 per cent + staging) May Election of Mrs Thatcher and the Conservatives Creation of the Efficiency Unit Nov MINIS introduced in DoE 14 The Civil Service Reforms of the 1980st 1980 May 1 Cabinet approves 630,000 manpower target (from 708,000) Council of Civil Service Unions formed Inflation at 22 per cent May 6 Rayner’s ‘lasting reforms’ agreed and MINIS circulated to Cabinet Permanent Secretaries’ less than successful dinner with the Prime Minister July ‘Big 4’ recommend abolition of CSD and Mrs Thatcher conditionally agrees Oct 27 Government unilaterally abandons pay comparability Oct Annual Rayner scrutiny programme endorsed by Cabinet ‘Operation backtrack’ Hawtin-Moore Report rejects CSD-Treasury merger Nov Mrs Thatcher rejects merger Dec Treasury Select Committee (Du Cann) rejects merger Mrs Thatcher considers creation of a Prime Minister’s
Recommended publications
  • DR HOGGART' S FAREWELL Peter Smith
    DR HOGGART' S FAREWELL Peter Smith Although Richard Hoggart is upset at hav- Hoggart had served six years. The last two ing been dropped as vice-chair of the Arts were served as vice-chair. It was expected Council he is deriving comfort from the fris- that Hoggart would be asked to stay on a son of martyrdom that comes from the year or so more because in a few months' knowledge that the decision to axe him was time chairperson Kenneth Robinson (and taken by Margaret Thatcher. Why should now a member of the SDP) retires. It was she be bothered about the vice-chair of the thought that all the powers that be would Arts Council? recognise the expediency of keeping Hog- The Arts Council proper consists of a gart on to give a continuity of leadership. chairperson, currently Kenneth Robinson, And, irrespective of what one thinks of Hog- and twenty members. These twenty-one gart's political or artistic views, he has had people are allegedly appointed by the Minis- the guts to lead with his chin: he was the Arts ter for the Arts in the name of the Secretary Council's 'hit man'. He wrote many articles of State for Education and Science. The defending the Council's work and policy vice-chairperson of the Council is filled' and has been publicly critical of the manner from among the members of the Council — in which the press deals with the issue of in other words, they vote one of themselves public funding for the arts.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Chilcot Report Some Thoughts on International Law And
    The Chilcot Report Some Thoughts on International Law and Legal Advice James A Green and Stephen Samuel+ Abstract The Report of the Iraq (Chilcot) Inquiry was finally published, 7 years after the Inquiry’s creation, on 6 July 2016. The scope of the Inquiry’s work was vast, and this was reflected in the enormous size of its final Report. The publication of the Report thus raises a multitude of questions requiring further analysis. In this short article, we aim to contribute some initial thoughts, immediately following the Report’s publication, in just two (interrelated) areas. First, we comment on the role of international law in the Chilcot Inquiry. To what extent was international law considered and how was it presented in the Report? We also ask whether the Report reaches any implicit substantive legal conclusions, despite formally refraining from determinations of law. Secondly, we review the Inquiry’s findings concerning international legal advice and legal advisers. In particular, we contribute some thoughts on the Report’s treatment of questions relating to the appropriate recipients of legal advice and its transparency, the timeliness of advice, the perception and treatment of law and legal advice by the Government, and the independence and quality of that advice. Professor of Public International Law, University of Reading. + Doctoral Candidate, University of Reading. The authors would like to thank April Longstaffe for her research assistance and the ESRC funded ‘Commissions of Inquiry: Problems and Prospects’ project based at the Human Rights and International Law Unit, University of Liverpool, for the financial support both in relation to financing April’s work for us and for funding our trip to Liverpool in January 2015 (well before the publication of the Chilcot Report in July 2016) to present a work-in-progress version of our underpinning research.
    [Show full text]
  • PRIME MINISTER Lunch for Collea Ues You Were Concerned About The
    PRIME MINISTER Lunch for Collea ues You were concerned about the list of colleagues which I put to you last night as possible guests for 18th April. 1 As you know, almost ail the Ministers of State and the Parliamentary Under Secretaries have now been included in a Monday lunch, and we are getting through the outstanding ones quite quickly. Three of the outstanding PUSSs are from the Scottish, Irish and Welsh Offices, and because they are not often in London on Mondays, I have liaised with their Private Offices for a suitable date_„ I know that James Douglas Hamilton and Peter Vidgers- are able to come on 18th April, and Ian Grist is available on 25th April. I know you are worried about the Senior/Junior mix. The last lunch was rather unbalanced because both John Wakeham and David Waddington were not present. This would not normally be the case, and I know that your invitations to senior backbenchers and to Parliamentary Private Secretaries have been very well received. However, you mav prefer to go through the list of Ministers of State again. Overleaf are two bossible lists for 18th April, and also two possible lists for 25th April (reserves in brackets). One set of lists includes senior backbenchers and PPSs, and one set reverts to Ministers of State. Please would you indicate which you prefer? • Page Two i8th APRIL John MacGregor (Lord Mackay) James Douglas-Hamilton Peter Viggers Mark Lennox-Boyd (Tristan Garel-Jones) Geoffrey Johnson-Smith (John Hannam or John MacGregor (Lord Mackay) David Mellor (Chris Patten) Tim Renton (John Patten)
    [Show full text]
  • Open PDF 132KB
    Written evidence from Dr Samantha Newbery (CHIS0009) Biography A researcher specialising in intelligence and counter-terrorism, Dr Newbery’s forthcoming book addresses the intersection of the use of informers (also known as agents and covert human intelligence sources (CHIS)) and criminality during ‘the troubles’ in Northern Ireland. The book’s themes and cases are directly relevant to this Bill. Dr Newbery’s previous research also addressed policy-making on human rights issues. Her book Interrogation, Intelligence and Security (Manchester University Press, 2015) considered legal and ethical questions raised by the UK’s use of controversial interrogation techniques for counter-terrorism and counter-insurgency since 1945, techniques that were found to be in breach of the European Convention on Human Rights. She is also co-author of Why Spy? The Art of Intelligence (Hurst, 2015) with the late Brian Stewart CMG, a former Deputy Chief of the Secret Intelligence Service. Executive Summary 1. A statutory power to authorise criminal conduct by CHIS This written evidence is in favour of efforts to establish a statutory power to authorise criminal conduct by CHIS. It is appropriate that the Bill covers all public authorities that RIPA permits to use CHIS. Authorisations should only be granted after being approved by an independent review. 2. Immunity from prosecution The ability to prosecute current and former CHIS is essential. The fact that the Bill does not grant them immunity from prosecution should be made clearer to the public, to CHIS and to the handlers to whom CHIS report, either in the Bill itself or through associated publicity.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright Statement
    COPYRIGHT STATEMENT This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with its author and no quotation from the thesis and no information derived from it may be published without the author’s prior consent. i ii REX WHISTLER (1905 – 1944): PATRONAGE AND ARTISTIC IDENTITY by NIKKI FRATER A thesis submitted to the University of Plymouth in partial fulfilment for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of Humanities & Performing Arts Faculty of Arts and Humanities September 2014 iii Nikki Frater REX WHISTLER (1905-1944): PATRONAGE AND ARTISTIC IDENTITY Abstract This thesis explores the life and work of Rex Whistler, from his first commissions whilst at the Slade up until the time he enlisted for active service in World War Two. His death in that conflict meant that this was a career that lasted barely twenty years; however it comprised a large range of creative endeavours. Although all these facets of Whistler’s career are touched upon, the main focus is on his work in murals and the fields of advertising and commercial design. The thesis goes beyond the remit of a purely biographical stance and places Whistler’s career in context by looking at the contemporary art world in which he worked, and the private, commercial and public commissions he secured. In doing so, it aims to provide a more comprehensive account of Whistler’s achievement than has been afforded in any of the existing literature or biographies. This deeper examination of the artist’s practice has been made possible by considerable amounts of new factual information derived from the Whistler Archive and other archival sources.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Political Economy of Trade: Understanding the Treatment of Non-Tariff Measures in European Union Trade Policy
    The London School of Economics and Political Science The New Political Economy of Trade: Understanding the Treatment of Non-Tariff Measures in European Union Trade Policy Elitsa Garnizova A thesis submitted to the Department of International Relations of the London School of Economics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, London, November 2018 Page 1 of 324 Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the MPhil/ PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me, and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 115,854 words; 99,109 excluding Table of Contents, Bibliography and Appendices. Statement of use of third party for editorial help I can confirm that Chapter 1 was copy edited for conventions of language, spelling, and grammar by Bregtje Kamphuis, and Chapters 2 and 3 were edited by Dr Marina Cino-Pagliarello. Page 2 of 324 Abstract Non-tariff measures have become a central topic to the debate of how international trade rules and domestic regulatory choices are to co-exist.
    [Show full text]
  • Suez 1956 24 Planning the Intervention 26 During the Intervention 35 After the Intervention 43 Musketeer Learning 55
    Learning from the History of British Interventions in the Middle East 55842_Kettle.indd842_Kettle.indd i 006/09/186/09/18 111:371:37 AAMM 55842_Kettle.indd842_Kettle.indd iiii 006/09/186/09/18 111:371:37 AAMM Learning from the History of British Interventions in the Middle East Louise Kettle 55842_Kettle.indd842_Kettle.indd iiiiii 006/09/186/09/18 111:371:37 AAMM Edinburgh University Press is one of the leading university presses in the UK. We publish academic books and journals in our selected subject areas across the humanities and social sciences, combining cutting-edge scholarship with high editorial and production values to produce academic works of lasting importance. For more information visit our website: edinburghuniversitypress.com © Louise Kettle, 2018 Edinburgh University Press Ltd The Tun – Holyrood Road, 12(2f) Jackson’s Entry, Edinburgh EH8 8PJ Typeset in 11/1 3 Adobe Sabon by IDSUK (DataConnection) Ltd, and printed and bound in Great Britain. A CIP record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 978 1 4744 3795 0 (hardback) ISBN 978 1 4744 3797 4 (webready PDF) ISBN 978 1 4744 3798 1 (epub) The right of Louise Kettle to be identifi ed as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, and the Copyright and Related Rights Regulations 2003 (SI No. 2498). 55842_Kettle.indd842_Kettle.indd iivv 006/09/186/09/18 111:371:37 AAMM Contents Acknowledgements vii 1. Learning from History 1 Learning from History in Whitehall 3 Politicians Learning from History 8 Learning from the History of Military Interventions 9 How Do We Learn? 13 What is Learning from History? 15 Who Learns from History? 16 The Learning Process 18 Learning from the History of British Interventions in the Middle East 21 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Leadership and Change: Prime Ministers in the Post-War World - Alec Douglas-Home Transcript
    Leadership and Change: Prime Ministers in the Post-War World - Alec Douglas-Home Transcript Date: Thursday, 24 May 2007 - 12:00AM PRIME MINISTERS IN THE POST-WAR WORLD: ALEC DOUGLAS-HOME D.R. Thorpe After Andrew Bonar Law's funeral in Westminster Abbey in November 1923, Herbert Asquith observed, 'It is fitting that we should have buried the Unknown Prime Minister by the side of the Unknown Soldier'. Asquith owed Bonar Law no posthumous favours, and intended no ironic compliment, but the remark was a serious under-estimate. In post-war politics Alec Douglas-Home is often seen as the Bonar Law of his times, bracketed with his fellow Scot as an interim figure in the history of Downing Street between longer serving Premiers; in Bonar Law's case, Lloyd George and Stanley Baldwin, in Home's, Harold Macmillan and Harold Wilson. Both Law and Home were certainly 'unexpected' Prime Ministers, but both were also 'under-estimated' and they made lasting beneficial changes to the political system, both on a national and a party level. The unexpectedness of their accessions to the top of the greasy pole, and the brevity of their Premierships (they were the two shortest of the 20th century, Bonar Law's one day short of seven months, Alec Douglas-Home's two days short of a year), are not an accurate indication of their respective significance, even if the precise details of their careers were not always accurately recalled, even by their admirers. The Westminster village is often another world to the general public. Stanley Baldwin was once accosted on a train from Chequers to London, at the height of his fame, by a former school friend.
    [Show full text]
  • Sir Alan Campbell Interviewed by Jane Barder 19/1/96 Typed by Jeremy Wiltshire 10/6/96
    Contents of interview Entry to Foreign Office, 1946. p 2 Service under Lord Killearn, Singapore; marriage, 1947-48. pp 2-4 Private Secretary to PUS William Strang, 1950-53. pp 5-6 Head of Chancery, Rome, 1952-55: Trieste problem; pp 6-8 Communist threat. Head of Chancery, Peking, 1955-57: role of Head of Chancery; pp 8-12 relations with Chinese; recognition problem; anti-British demonstrations at time of Suez; schooling of children. Imperial Defence College, 1958. pp 12-13 News Department, 1958-60; comments on Selwyn Lloyd, pp 13-17 Hoyer-Millar, Macmillan and aftermath of Suez. Counsellor and Head of Chancery, New York (UN), 1961-65; pp 17-23 death of Hammarskjold; anti-Imperialist feeling; Lord Caradon (political appointees to diplomatic posts). Comments on Alec Douglas-Home. p 23 Western European Department at FO, 1965-67. pp 23-24 Counsellor and Head of Chancery, Paris, 1967-69; appointment pp 24-25 to post; EEC. Ambassador to Addis Ababa, 1969-72; Haile Selassie; Idi Amin; pp 25-28 growth of sedition in Ethiopia. Deputy Under-Secretary, FO, 1974-76; effective “Political pp 28-32 Director”; foreign policy talks with other EEC members; commercial competition with EEC states; co-ordination of EEC foreign policy. Concluding comments on: international civil servants; women pp 32-35 in diplomatic service; merger of CRO and FO; spending cuts in late 1970’s; David Owen as Foreign Secretary. 1 Sir Alan Campbell Interviewed by Jane Barder 19/1/96 Typed by Jeremy Wiltshire 10/6/96 An interview between Sir Alan Campbell and Jane Barder, at his flat in London.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Wednesday Volume 494 24 June 2009 No. 98 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Wednesday 24 June 2009 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2009 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through the Office of Public Sector Information website at www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/ Enquiries to the Office of Public Sector Information, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; Tel: 0044 (0) 208876344; e-mail: [email protected] 777 24 JUNE 2009 778 rightly made the case. I hope she will understand when I House of Commons point her to the work of the World Bank and other international financial institutions on infrastructure in Wednesday 24 June 2009 Ukraine and other countries. We will continue to watch the regional economic needs of Ukraine through our involvement with those institutions. The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock Mr. Gary Streeter (South-West Devon) (Con): Given PRAYERS the strategic significance of Ukraine as a political buffer zone between the EU and Russia, does the Minister not think that it was perhaps an error of judgment to close [MR.SPEAKER in the Chair] the DFID programme in Ukraine last year? It would be an utter tragedy if Ukraine’s democracy should fail, so BUSINESS BEFORE QUESTIONS should we not at the very least be running significant capacity-building programmes to support it? SPOLIATION ADVISORY PANEL Resolved, Mr. Thomas: We are running capacity-building programmes on democracy and good governance through That an Humble Address be presented to Her Majesty, That she will be graciously pleased to give directions that there be laid the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This Publication
    ASEF PUBLIC DIPLOMACY HANDBOOK HOW TO WIN HEARTS AND MINDS Published by: Asia-Europe Foundation (ASEF) 31 Heng Mui Keng Terrace Singapore 119595 Editors: Ms Rebecca STETTER Ms Sunkyoung LEE Contributing Editor: Mr Richard WERLY © Asia-Europe Foundation (ASEF) 2016 The electronic version of the ASEF Public Diplomacy Handbook, “How to Win Hearts and Minds” shall be licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDeriviatives 4.0 International License. This means that non-commercial use of text or parts of texts for educational purposes is allowed; however, one must attribute the work both to the individual authors and to the publisher, including ASEF’s URL (www. asef.org). More information about this license can be found at http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. The views expressed in this volume are the sole responsibility of the authors and can under no circumstances be attributed as the views of the Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM), ASEF, or the editors of this handbook. This publication has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of the speakers and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union. This project is co-funded by the European Union. ASEF PUBLIC DIPLOMACY HANDBOOK HOW TO win hearts and minds ASEF Public Diplomacy Handbook Asia-Europe Foundation (ASEF) ASEF promotes understanding, strengthens relationships and facilitates cooperation among the people, institutions and organisations of Asia and Europe. ASEF enhances dialogue, enables exchanges and encourages collaboration across the thematic areas of culture, economy, education, governance, public health and sustainable development.
    [Show full text]
  • Holders of Ministerial Office in the Conservative Governments 1979-1997
    Holders of Ministerial Office in the Conservative Governments 1979-1997 Parliamentary Information List Standard Note: SN/PC/04657 Last updated: 11 March 2008 Author: Department of Information Services All efforts have been made to ensure the accuracy of this data. Nevertheless the complexity of Ministerial appointments, changes in the machinery of government and the very large number of Ministerial changes between 1979 and 1997 mean that there may be some omissions from this list. Where an individual was a Minister at the time of the May 1997 general election the end of his/her term of office has been given as 2 May. Finally, where possible the exact dates of service have been given although when this information was unavailable only the month is given. The Parliamentary Information List series covers various topics relating to Parliament; they include Bills, Committees, Constitution, Debates, Divisions, The House of Commons, Parliament and procedure. Also available: Research papers – impartial briefings on major bills and other topics of public and parliamentary concern, available as printed documents and on the Intranet and Internet. Standard notes – a selection of less formal briefings, often produced in response to frequently asked questions, are accessible via the Internet. Guides to Parliament – The House of Commons Information Office answers enquiries on the work, history and membership of the House of Commons. It also produces a range of publications about the House which are available for free in hard copy on request Education web site – a web site for children and schools with information and activities about Parliament. Any comments or corrections to the lists would be gratefully received and should be sent to: Parliamentary Information Lists Editor, Parliament & Constitution Centre, House of Commons, London SW1A OAA.
    [Show full text]