DOCSLIB.ORG

Vancouver Fraser Port Authority PROJECT and ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW APPLICATION

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority PROJECT and ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW APPLICATION Vancouver Fraser Port Authority PROJECT AND ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW APPLICATION Annacis Island WWTP New Outfall System CDM Smith Canada ULC Prepared for: December 29, 2017 This page intentionally left blank Table of Contents Section 1 General Submission Requirements .................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Application Form ...................................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Contact List .................................................................................................................................................................. 1-1 Section 2 Project Description ........................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 General Scope ............................................................................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1.1 Metro Vancouver ......................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.2 Annacis Island WWTP History .............................................................................................................. 2-2 2.1.3 Project Rational ........................................................................................................................................... 2-3 2.1.4 Project Overview ......................................................................................................................................... 2-3 2.1.5 Potential Post-Construction Impacts .................................................................................................. 2-5 2.1.6 Studies ............................................................................................................................................................. 2-6 2.2 Operation ..................................................................................................................................................................... 2-7 2.2.1 Capacity ........................................................................................................................................................... 2-7 2.2.2 Operational Impacts .................................................................................................................................. 2-8 2.3 Construction................................................................................................................................................................ 2-8 2.3.1 Construction Schedule and Staging ..................................................................................................... 2-8 2.3.2 In-River Construction Method ............................................................................................................. 2-10 2.3.2.1 Season 1: River Riser ................................................................................................................. 2-11 2.3.2.2 Season 2: Diffuser Installation ............................................................................................... 2-12 2.3.2.3 Season 3: Diffuser Connection ............................................................................................... 2-13 2.3.2.4 Season 3/4: Bypass Outfall Repair....................................................................................... 2-13 2.3.3 Tunnel Construction Method ............................................................................................................... 2-13 2.3.4 Construction Equipment ........................................................................................................................ 2-15 2.3.5 Construction Impacts .............................................................................................................................. 2-16 2.3.5.1 Traffic Impacts .............................................................................................................................. 2-16 2.3.5.2 Navigation Impacts ..................................................................................................................... 2-16 2.3.5.3 Dredging Impacts ........................................................................................................................ 2-16 2.3.5.4 Noise Impacts ................................................................................................................................ 2-17 2.3.5.5 Lighting Impacts .......................................................................................................................... 2-18 Section 3 Design Drawings ............................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Site Plan ........................................................................................................................................................................ 3-1 3.1.1 General Drawings ........................................................................................................................................ 3-1 3.1.2 Lease and Property Boundaries, Easements, and Right of Ways ........................................... 3-1 3.1.3 Elevations and Legal High-Water Mark ............................................................................................. 3-1 3.1.4 Location and Dimensions of all Existing and Proposed Buildings ......................................... 3-2 3.1.5 Construction Access Points ..................................................................................................................... 3-2 3.2 Land Structures and Equipment ........................................................................................................................ 3-3 3.2.1 Excavation Depths ...................................................................................................................................... 3-3 3.2.2 Site Loading ................................................................................................................................................... 3-3 3.2.2.1 Outfall Shaft ..................................................................................................................................... 3-3 3.2.2.2 Outfall Tunnel ................................................................................................................................. 3-4 i • Table of Contents 3.3 Marine Structures and Equipment .................................................................................................................... 3-4 3.3.1 Temporary Marine Structures and Equipment .............................................................................. 3-4 3.3.1.1 Support of Excavation for River Riser .................................................................................. 3-5 3.3.1.2 Support of Excavation for Diffuser Manifold ..................................................................... 3-6 3.3.2 Permanent Marine Structures ............................................................................................................... 3-7 3.3.2.1 River Riser ........................................................................................................................................ 3-7 3.3.2.2 River Riser Piles ............................................................................................................................. 3-9 3.3.2.3 Diffuser Manifold ........................................................................................................................ 3-10 3.3.2.4 Outfall Tunnel............................................................................................................................... 3-11 3.4 Lot Grading and Utilities ..................................................................................................................................... 3-11 3.4.1 Lot Grading .................................................................................................................................................. 3-11 3.4.2 Utilities .......................................................................................................................................................... 3-11 3.5 Lighting Plan ............................................................................................................................................................ 3-12 3.5.1 Construction Phase Lighting ................................................................................................................ 3-12 3.5.2 Operational Phase Lighting .................................................................................................................. 3-12 Section 4 Studies and Reports .......................................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Geotechnical Reports and Analysis ................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1.1 Geotechnical Investigations .................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1.2 Seismic Analysis ........................................................................................................................................... 4-2 4.1.2.1 Seismic Design Criteria ..............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Alex Fraser Bridge Capacity Improvement Project
    p ALEX FRASER BRIDGE CAPACITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Date: Tuesday, February 20,2018 Time: 4:30 - 5:00 p.m. Location: Annacis Room Introduction: Steven Lan, Director of Engineering Presentation: Gerry Fleming, Project Manager South Coast Region Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure Background Materials: • Memorandum from the Director of Engineering dated February 14, 2018 M M RANDUM City of Delta Engineering To: Mayor and Council From: Steven Lan, P.Eng., Director of Engineering Date: February 14, 2018 Subject: Council Workshop: Alex Fraser Bridge Capacity Improvement Project File No.: 5220-20/ALEX F CC: Ken Kuntz, Acting City Manager The Alex Fraser Bridge Capacity Improvement Project incorporates improvements to the Alex Fraser Bridge and Highway 91 including the introduction of counter-flow over the bridge to increase the capacity. Besides other improvements, an additional centre lane will be created that will provide for four lanes northbound and three lanes southbound during the morning commute and, four lanes southbound with three lanes northbound during the rest of the day. Staff from the South Coast Region of the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure will be presenting the project to Council on Tuesday, February 20,2018. An overview of the presentation is included (Attachment A) for Council's information. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have further questions at 604-946-3299. ,-f{N~-----~ '~Steven Lan, P.Eng. Director of Engineering Attachment: A. Alex Fraser Bridge Capacity Improvement Project Overview GWB/bm -'-_'-___-.:-.:_..:....,._ ·-,o.:!.-..:·.:;·..:.:.:.::..=.::::.:...:= ~~~~~, ....l ' .. _.-- --.---:;; ~.- ..... -n-'- -~---;""'"" --.-..-::--: .'"tf': .~"-;;.~w:---~-:" Alex Fraser Bridge Capacity Improvement Project BRITISH COLUMBIA Project Overview February 201 -8 Gerry Fleming Project Ma nager -0» om :::::m CD () South Coast Region, Ministry of Transportation a nd Infrastruc ture ::::r ->'3 o CD -::l """-I»c..v ......
    [Show full text]
  • 10472 Scott Road, Surrey, BC
    FOR SALE 10472 Scott Road, Surrey, BC 3.68 ACRE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY WITH DIRECT ACCESS TO THE SOUTH FRASER PERIMETER ROAD PATULLO BRIDGE KING GEORGE BOULEVARD SOUTH FRASER PERIMETER ROAD (HIGHWAY #17) 10472 SCOTT ROAD TANNERY ROAD SCOTT ROAD 104 AVENUE Location The subject property is located on the corner of Scott Road and 104 Avenue, situated in the South Westminster area of Surrey, British Columbia. This location benefits from direct access to the South Fraser Perimeter Road (Highway #17) which connects to all locations in Metro Vancouver via Highways 1, 91, and 99. The location also provides convenient access south to the U.S. border, which is a 45 minute drive away via the SFPR and either Highway 1 or Highway 91. The property is surrounded by a variety of restaurants and neighbours, such as Williams Machinery, BA Robinson, Frito Lay, Lordco, Texcan and the Home Depot. SCOTT ROAD Opportunity A rare opportunity to acquire a large corner Scott Road frontage property that has been preloaded and has a development permit at third reading for a 69,400 SF warehouse. 104 AVENUE Buntzen Lake Capilano Lake West Vancouver rm A n ia North d n I 99 Vancouver BC RAIL Pitt Lake 1 Harrison Lake Bridge Lions Gate Ir o Port Moody n 99 W o PORT METRO r VANCOUVER Burrard Inlet k e r s M e m o r i a l B C.P.R. English Bay r i d g e 7A Stave Lake Port Coquitlam Vancouver Maple Ridge 7 Key Features CP INTERMODAL Coquitlam 7 1 7 9 Burnaby Pitt 7 Meadows 7 VANCOUVER P o r t M a C.P.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Pattullo Bridge Replacement
    L P PATTULLO BRIDGE REPLACEMENT Date: Monday, July 15, 2013 Location: Annacis Room Time: 4:15 - 4:45 pm Presentation: Steven Lan, Director of Engineering Background Materials: Memorandum from the Director of Engineering dated July 9, 2013. i. MEMORANDUM The Corporation of Delta Engineering To: Mayor and Council From: Steven Lan, P.Eng., Director of Engineerin g Date: July 9, 201 3 Subject: Council Workshop: Pattullo Bri dge Replacement File No.: 1220·20/PATT CC: George V. Harvi e, Chief Administrative Officer TransLink recently completed the initial round of public consultation sessions in New Westminster and Surrey to solicit feedback from the public on the Pattullo Bridge. A number of alternative crossings were developed for three possible corridors: 1. Existing Pattullo Bridge Corridor 2. Sapperton Bar Corridor • New crossing located east of the existing Pattullo Bridge that would provide a more direct connection between Surrey and Coquitlam 3. Tree Island Corridor • New crossing located west of the existing Pattullo Bridge that would essentially function as an alternative to the Queensborough Bridge Based on the initial screening work that has been undertaken, six alternatives have been identified for further consideration: 1. Pattullo Bridge Corridor - Rehabilitated Bridge (3 lanes) 2. Pattullo Bridge Corridor - Rehabilitated Bridge (4 lanes) 3. Pattullo Bridge Corridor - New Bridge (4 lanes) 4. Pattullo Bridge Corridor - New Bridge (5 lanes) 5. Pattullo Bridge Corridor - New Bridge (6 lanes) 6. Sapperton Bar Corridor - New Bridge (4 lanes) coupled with Rehabilitated Pattullo Bridge (2-3 lanes) Options involving a new bridge are based on the implementation of user based charges (tolls) to help pay for the bridge upgrades.
    [Show full text]
  • George Massey Tunnel Expansion Plan Study
    Report to MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION AND HIGHWAYS i On GEORGE MASSEY TUNNEL EXPANSION PLANNING STUDY TTaffic Impact Taffic Operations Parking ransit Tansportation rucking Planning Modelling 4 March 26, 1991 Ministry of Transportation and Highways South Coast Regional District 7818 Sixth Street Burnaby, B.C. V3N 4N8; Attention:: Ms. Maria Swan, P.Eng. Senior Transportation Planning Engineer Dear Sir: RE: Expansion of George Massey Tunnel - Preliminary Planning Studv In accordance with your instructions, we have now carried out the preliminary planning study of the future expansion of the George Massey Tunnel on Highway 99. The attached report presents an overview of the study together with the resultant conclusions and recommendations. Thank you for the opportunity to work on this project on behalf of the Ministry. I trust that this report enables your staff to continue with the next steps necessary to bring these recommendations to fruition. 145gmasy\gmt.rpt 520 - 1112 West Pender Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6E 2S1 Tel: (604) 688-8826 Fax: 688-9562 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................... 1 1.1 Background to Study ....................................... 1 1.2 Scope of Study ........................................... 2 1.3 History and Role of the George Massey Tunnel ...................... 2 2.0 EXISTING TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM .......................... 5 2.1 Regional Road Network ..................................... 5 2.2 Current Traffic Volumes on Fraser River Crossings .................... 8 2.3 Historic Growth in Traffic Volumes .............................. 12 2.4 Growth in Capacity Across the South Arm ......................... 21 2.5 Physical Constraints on Highway 99 .............................. 22 2.6 Projected Growth in Ferry Traffic ............................... 22 2.7 Role of Transit ........................................... 23 3.0 GROWTH IN TRAVEL DEMAND ...............................
    [Show full text]
  • Bridges to Buntzen 200K
    Permanent Brevet #53 Submitted by: Tracy Barill Bridges to Buntzen 200K Distance Distance (km- Turn Direction Route (Interval) cumulative) Start – King Edward Canada Line Station (Cambie Street and King Edward Ave, Vancouver) 0 R W 5.9 King Edward Avenue 5.9 R N 0.9 Crown Street 6.8 L W 4.1 W 16th Ave 10.9 L S 4.1 SW Marine Drive 15.0 BR S 5.4 SW Marine Drive 20.4 R S 0.4 SW Marine Drive 20.8 BL E 0.1 SW Marine Drive 20.9 R S 0.2 SW Marine Drive CAUTION – Bear left to follow Grant 21.1 BL S 1.1 McConachie Way over Arthur Laing Bridge 22.2 R N 0.3 new BIKE PATH to access Grauer Road 22.5 L SW 1.1 Grauer Road 23.6 R SW 5.2 Templeton Street – becomes Ferguson Road CONTROL 1: IONA ISLAND Park Gate – Information Control (washrooms 28.8 another .5 km further) 28.8 T NE 7.1 Ferguson Road becomes Templeton Street 35.9 SO E 0.1 Cross Grant McConachie Way 36.0 L N 0.4 Miller Road Wellington Crescent (1st on right – may not have a 36.4 R E 1.0 sign – bike access only) 37.4 R NE 0.4 Airport Road 37.8 R E 0.4 Russ Baker Way 38.2 SO E 2.0 No. 2 Road (continue over bridge) 40.2 R S 0.8 Granville Ave (becomes Railway) 41.0 BL E 2.4 Railway Ave 43.4 R S 1.6 Williams Ave 45.0 L E 0.6 Springmont Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Outcomes in Suicidal Bridge Jumping in the Lower Mainland-JRB
    Outcomes in suicidal bridge jumping in the Lower Mainland by DYLAN STEPHANIAN BASc, The University of British Columbia, 2014 Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in The Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies (Experimental Medicine) The University of British ColumbiA (Vancouver) December, 2019 © Dylan Stephanian, 2019 The following individuals certify that they have read, and recommend to the faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies for acceptance, the thesis entitled: Outcomes in suicidal bridge jumping in the Lower Mainland Submitted by Dylan Stephanian in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MAster of Science in Experimental Medicine. Examining committee Dr Jeff Brubacher, Emergency Medicine Supervisor Dr Doug Brown, Emergency Medicine Supervisory Committee Member Dr Andrew MacPherson, Emergency Medicine External Examiner ii Abstract On average, one person attempts suicide by jumping from a bridge in the Lower Mainland of British ColumbiA once every 14 days, but the population that jumps and their outcomes following a suicide attempt are poorly understood. A multi-agency retrospective chart review was performed using records from the Canadian Coast Guard, Joint Rescue Coordination Center, police departments, and the British Columbia Coroner’s Service to identify incidents. A complete picture of each incident was then built by identifying corresponding BC Ambulance Service and hospital records, and linking all records for each incident. This methodology successfully identified a comprehensive list of incidents, and may be useful in future prehospital and search and rescue medicine research. Records from the ten agencies involved in these incidents were collected and linked to create a dataset describing all known jumps from a bridge >12m in height in the Lower Mainland of BC from January 1, 2006 to February 28, 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Installation of Dynamic Message Sign on Southbound Knight Street
    City of Richmond Report to Committee To: Public Works and Transportation Committee Date: March 27, 2017 From: Victor Wei, P. Eng. File: 01-0150-20- Director, Transportation THIG1/2017-Vol 01 Re: Installation of Dynamic Message Sign on Southbound Knight Street Staff Recommendation That the staff report titled "Installation of Dynamic Message Sign on Southbound Knight Street" dated March 27, 2017, from the Director, Transportation, to support regional transportation management in the Metro Vancouver area, be received for information. Victor Wei, P. Eng. Director, Transportation (604-276-4131) Att. 1 REPORT CONCURRENCE ROUTED To: CONCURRENCE CONCURRENCE OF GENERAL MANAGER Engineering Real Estate Services REVIEWED BY STAFF REPORT I INITIALS: AGENDA REVIEW SUBCOMMITTEE PWT - 30 5338814 March 27, 2017 - 2 - Staff Report Origin At the March 18,2015 meeting of the Public Works and Transportation Committee, members received a staff report for information regarding the installation of a dynamic message sign by the Ministry of Transportation & Infrastructure (the Ministry) to provide northbound road users on Knight Street with up-to-date travel information. Installation of this sign is currently proceeding. Continuing the expansion oflntelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) that benefit Richmond's road users by allowing for more effective monitoring and management of traffic incidents, as well as the provision of real-time information to the public, this report describes the forthcoming installation of a complementary dynamic message sign by the Ministry to provide southbound road users on Knight Street with current travel information. Analysis Dynamic Message Signs The Ministry has installed a number of dynamic message signs (DMS) along provincial highways in Metro Vancouver that provide travellers with real-time information on road conditions such as travel times and wait times at Canada-US border crossings.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2011 Baseline Truck Traffic in Metro Vancouver
    Fall 2011 Baseline Truck Traffic in Metro Vancouver Watercrossings, Border Crossings and Top 10 Truck Volume Locations (Weekday, 6AM-10PM) Transportation Committee Map of the Month March 12, 2014 Legend Screenline Volumes Total Vehicles Counted (fall weekday in 2011) Light and Heavy Commercial Trucks Lions Gate Bridge Passenger Vehicles, Motorcycles, 61,000 Vehicles Second Narrows Bridge Transit Vehicles, Bicycles 1% Trucks 120,000 Vehicles Daily Average from Auto Counts (no truck data) 5% Trucks Regional Land Use Designations Burrard Bridge Industrial and Mixed Employment 53,000 Vehicles Cambie Bridge General Urban 2% Trucks 46,000 Vehicles Agricultural, Conservation & Recreation, Rural 2% Trucks Highway 1 - West of Granville Bridge North Road Brunette Ave. - Pitt River Bridge 51,000 Vehicles 103,000 Vehicles South of Highway 1 70,000 Vehicles 1% Trucks 8% Trucks 53,000 Vehicles 6% Trucks 13% Trucks Port Mann Bridge Arthur Laing Bridge 96,000 Vehicles Knight St Bridge 72,000 Vehicles, 2% Trucks 7% Trucks 89,000 Vehicles Golden Ears Bridge Airport Connector Bridge- 19,000 Vehicles, 5% Trucks 8% Trucks Pattullo Bridge 27,000 Vehicles 8% Trucks Moray Bridge- 17,000 Vehicles, 5% Trucks 63,000 Vehicles Oak St Bridge 7% Trucks Dinsmore Bridge- 21,000 Vehicles, 2% Trucks 78,000 Vehicles Queensborough Bridge 3% Trucks 79,000 Vehicles No. 2 Road Bridge- 30,000 Vehicles, 1% Trucks Highway 1 - West of Highway 91 - West of 9% Trucks 176th Street No. 8 Road Alex Fraser Bridge 70,000 Vehicles 82,000 Vehicles 102,000 Vehicles 12% Trucks 10% Trucks 8% Trucks George Massey Tunnel 77,000 Vehicles 7% Trucks Highway 1 - East of 264th Street 59,000 Vehicles 12% Trucks Point Roberts Border Crossing Highway 13 Border Crossing 5,500 Daily Average Highway 99 Border Crossing Highway 15 Border Crossing 4,400 Daily Average No truck data 13,000 Vehicles 13,000 Vehicles No truck data 1% Trucks 14% Trucks A Note About the Border Crossings Highway 99 Border Crossing prohibits all commercial vehicles, but a small number of commercial trucks were observed on the survey day.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Management Plan Appendices
    ... , ... .. .............. .. ......... ....... -• ··-· ............. •-···· ..... ---•;"'' ' _................... NEW WESTMINSTER.·.- ·:_.:;:,··... _.: ·. ..· .. .:1 .. /·. ~: . .: ,;·, ·.... , .. ·.... ... :: ·,· . : • .·•• _? __ HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN APPENDICES CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NEW WESTMINSTER November 1993 Cover Photo Pantllo Bridge New Westtninster, B.C. Souvenir Folder The Photogelatin Engraving Co. Ltd. Toronto Courtesy of Stephen Scheving APPENDICES TABLE OF CONTENTS A - Glossary of Terms B - List of People Interviewed C - Study Bulletin D - Notes from Council Work Session E - Schedule of Open House Events F - Open House Notices G- Wall Boards H - Sample Comment Sheet I - Information Handout J - "What We Heard" Summaries K- Neighbourhood Working Group Volunteers L - Principles of Heritage Conservation M - User and Technical Manuals for the Heritage Data Base N - Sample Site Forms and Site Form User Manual 0 - Completed Site Forms P - Neighbourhood Profiles Q - Sample Heritage Assessment Forms R - Victoria Neighbourhood Development Policy S - Examples of Interpretive Signage T - Tree Keepers Program APPENDIX Al Glossary of Terms DRAFT New Westminster Heritage Management Plan A FEW HERITAGE CONSERVATION TERMS Heritage Resources are defined as objects of historical, cultural, architectural, archeological or scenic significance which are important to a community. Historic Landscapes are places which possess a link or continuity of natural and built components that are united by human use and past events. Restoration is a process which involves the return of a building or site to its appearance at an earlier time. The building or landscape is recreated as it once was according to accurate historical or visual documentation. Renovation is often used interchangeably with rehabilitation to describe the modification of an existing building. Renovation extends the useful life of the building and may involve the upgrading of services.
    [Show full text]
  • The Waterfowl of the Fraser Delta, British Columbia BARRY A
    45 The waterfowl of the Fraser Delta, British Columbia BARRY A. LEACH Introduction average annual rainfall on the north An account has been given earlier mountainous side is 200 mm. (80 in.). In (Leach 1970) of the establishment of a the centre, at Steveston on Lulu Island, ‘Slimbridge on the Pacific’. This paper it is 100 mm. (39 in.) and on the south describes the surrounding area, its water­ side, at Boundary Bay it is 90 mm. fowl populations and the management (36 in.). Snowfall averages 36 mm. (14 in.) problems. but in some winters it remains only a day The Fraser delta is part of the lowland or two. The average annual temperature which extends from the Coast Mountains at Ladner in the centre of the delta is of British Columbia southward across the 9.5°C. The minimum frost-free period is alluvial plains of the Fraser River, the about 150 days per year and the average Skagit and other small rivers, to the annual period is some 200 days (Taylor southern extremity of Pugit Sound in the 1970). Due to the ‘puddling’ of cold air State of Washington. It may, however, be between the dykes, frosts tend to linger treated as a clearly defined sub-unit of on the delta farmlands. The growing this ecological area because recent en­ season begins in mid-March and lasts for vironmental changes in the Fraser Valley 250 to 265 days. have been more intensive than in the The main geographical features of the neighbouring area of Washington State lower valley and delta of the Fraser River immediately south of the international were formed during the retreat of the border.
    [Show full text]
  • New Westminster's Neighbourhoods Historical Context Statements
    New Westminster’s Neighbourhoods Historical Context Statements Queensborough 07 April 2010 VPL 2493 Denise Cook Design • Birmingham & Wood • Jean Barman 104 Queensborough Historical Neighbourhood Context Statement 07 April 2010 New Westminster’s Queensborough Neighbourhood Identifying an Historical Context What is an Historical Context? Historical contexts: An analysis of history, including the very recent past, is central Identify and explain the to heritage assessment and management. A heritage resource major themes, factors needs to be considered in the context of the history and historical and processes that have geography of the neighbourhood surrounding it and the underlying influenced the history of a historical influences that have shaped and continue to shape the neighbourhood area. The historical context of a place ensures that the significance of heritage resources can be understood, logically analyzed and Their objective is to clearly stated. provide a framework to investigate, identify An historic context statement is a document used in planning and manage heritage for a community’s heritage resources. It identifies the broad resources patterns of historic development in the community and identifies historic property types, such as buildings, sites, structures, They are not intended to objects, landscapes or districts which represent these patterns be a detailed account of of development. An historic context statement provides direction all aspects of the history for evaluating and protecting significant heritage resources. As a of a neighbourhood planning document, it is meant to be a dynamic work, evolving as They are not intended a community’s needs and desires change. to replace histories The historical context expands the broad themes of history into designed to serve other an historical narrative about a neighbourhood.
    [Show full text]
  • An Environmental History of the City of Vancouver Landfill in Delta, 1958–1981
    Dumping Like a State: An Environmental History of the City of Vancouver Landfill in Delta, 1958–1981 by Hailey Venn B.A. (History), Simon Fraser University, 2017 Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the Department of History Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences © Hailey Venn 2020 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Summer 2020 Copyright in this work rests with the author. Please ensure that any reproduction orre-use is done in accordance with the relevant national copyright legislation. Declaration of Committee Name: Hailey Venn Degree: Master of Arts Thesis title: Dumping Like a State: An Environmental History of the City of Vancouver Landfill in Delta, 1958 – 1981 Committee: Chair: Sarah Walshaw Senior Lecturer, History Tina Adcock Supervisor Assistant Professor, History Joseph E. Taylor III Co-supervisor Professor, History Nicolas Kenny Committee Member Associate Professor, History Arn Keeling Examiner Associate Professor, Geography Memorial University of Newfoundland ii Ethics Statement iii Abstract In 1966, the City of Vancouver opened a new landfill in Burns Bog, in the nearby municipality of Delta. This is an environmental history of its creation and first sixteen years of operation. Although the landfill resembled other high modernist projects in postwar Canada, this thesis argues it is best understood as an example of “mundane modernism.” The landfill’s planning and operation aligned with broader contemporary American and Canadian practices of cost-effective waste disposal. It was an unspectacular project to which Deltans offered little initial resistance. Officials therefore had no need to demonstrate technoscientific expertise to manufacture citizens' consent. Yet the landfill soon posed environmental nuisances and hazards to Delta’s residents, including leachate, the liquid waste a landfill produces.
    [Show full text]