DOCSLIB.ORG

American Foundations and the 'Scientific Study'

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
American Foundations and the 'Scientific Study' American Foundations and the ‘Scientific Study’ of International Relations in Europe, 1910-1940 Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) by Katharina Elisabeth Rietzler University College London (UCL) 2009 1 Declaration I, Katharina Elisabeth Rietzler, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. 19 July 2009 2 Abstract This thesis deals with the role of American philanthropic foundations in promoting an expert-led approach to international politics in Europe between the two world wars. Harking back to earlier forms of transatlantic elite internationalism, American foundations financed a number of institutions for the ‘scientific’ study of international relations, and constructed a transnational network of international relations specialists. The organisations at the heart of this study, the Rockefeller Foundation and the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, funded a variety of think tanks, academies and research institutes, some of which had international and some of which had national constituencies. Institutions supported by the foundations included the Hague Academy of International Law, the Geneva Graduate Institute of International Studies, the Royal Institute of International Affairs and the Deutsche Hochschule für Politik . Efforts to promote the cooperation between these institutions culminated in the funding of the International Studies Conference, a federation of institutes for the study of international relations organised under the auspices of the League of Nations in 1928. The philanthropic project to promote a ‘scientific’ approach to international relations turned the foundations into actors in a new international politics which they sought to rationalise at the same time. This new international politics was marked by the post- 1919 intertwining of governmental, intergovernmental and nongovernmental structures. Adopting a transnational approach which avoids conventional bilateral perspectives, this dissertation explores foundation activity in a variety of contexts. It analyses the foundations’ role as promoters of international expert exchange and internationalist education; as protagonists of American cultural diplomacy and targets of the cultural diplomacy of other countries; and finally, as nongovernmental organisations which undermined intergovernmental structures. Ultimately, this thesis contributes to the transnational history of American philanthropic foundations and sheds light on the role of nongovernmental organisations as actors in 20 th century international politics. 3 Table of Contents Acknowledgments Abbreviations Introduction 7 1 Philanthropic Internationalism 41 2 Foundations and the Internationalisation of 88 International Studies 3 International Relations As Seen From the Capital: 140 Philanthropy and Cultural Diplomacy 4 Competing Internationalisms: American Foundations and the 188 International Studies Conference 5 Epilogue 242 Conclusion 258 Appendix 276 Bibliography 277 4 Acknowledgments First, I would like to thank my supervisors, Kathleen Burk and Adam Smith. They have been unflinching in their kindness, provided encouragement and advice when I needed it but also gave me as much intellectual freedom as possible. It has been a pleasure and a privilege to work under them. Several institutions have supported the research on which this dissertation is based. The UCL Graduate School awarded a generous scholarship that ensured my financial independence for three years and provided additional material assistance for research trips and conference attendance. The UCL History Department helped with several travel bursaries and, most of all, a supportive and stimulating institutional setting. Further grants were provided by the German Historical Institute in Washington, D.C., the Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History and the Rockefeller Archive Center. Librarians and archivists make history writing possible and I certainly would not have been able to complete my research without their aid. Jane Gorjevsky at Columbia University’s Rare Book and Manuscript Library and Erwin Levold at the Rockefeller Archive Center have been particularly helpful over several years. I was fortunate to be able to discuss my research at several scholarly gatherings in Britain and abroad, and I have benefited greatly from the comments and suggestions that I received. I would especially like to thank Helge Pharo of the Forum for Contemporary History at the University of Oslo who made it possible for me to come to Norway as a visiting scholar. Many people have freely given their advice, criticism and good cheer. I cannot mention them all here but I would like to single out those who have commented on parts of the dissertation in draft form: Daniel Laqua, John A. Thompson, Bjørn Arne Steine, Hanne Vik and Waqar Zaidi. I have much appreciated their thoughtful advice. I would also like to thank Mark and Susan Kaminsky who have been very gracious hosts on several occasions. Throughout my graduate studies my family and friends have provided tremendous material and emotional support for which I am very grateful. Above all, special thanks go to Ananyo Bhattacharya. 5 Abbreviations The following abbreviations are used in the body of the thesis and the appendix: AJIL American Journal of International Law ASIL American Society for International Law CEIP Carnegie Endowment for International Peace CEPE Centre d’études de politique étrangère CF Commonwealth Fund FPA Foreign Policy Association FRPS Foreign Research and Press Service ICIC International Committee on Intellectual Cooperation IDI Institut de droit international IHEI Institut Universitaire de Hautes Etudes Internationales /Graduate Institute of International Studies, Geneva IIIC International Institute of Intellectual Cooperation IPR Institute of Pacific Relations IR International Relations IRC International Relations Club ISC International Studies Conference LSE London School of Economics and Political Science LSRM Laura Spelman Rockefeller Memorial OSS Office of Strategic Services RF Rockefeller Foundation RIIA Royal Institute of International Affairs YMCA Young Men’s Christian Association 6 Introduction On 26 April 1917, twenty days after the American declaration of war against Imperial Germany, Elihu Root, the President of the American Society of International Law, addressed his peers at their 11 th annual meeting. In an attempt to rouse enthusiasm for the United States’ war against autocracy and Prussian militarism, Root chose the effect of democracy on international relations as the theme of his address. Echoing Woodrow Wilson’s ‘democratic peace theory’, Root claimed that autocratic regimes were inherently warlike, due to “the deep and settled purpose of a ruling family or a ruling aristocratic class to enlarge its power”, whereas democracies held no such “sinister policies of ambition” because of their aversion to secret diplomacy and large military spending. 1 Of course, Root admitted, a democratically controlled foreign policy had its own pitfalls: “The peoples who govern themselves frequently misunderstand their international rights, and ignore their international duties. They are often swayed by prejudice, and blinded by passion. They are swift to decide in their own favor the most difficult questions upon which they are totally ignorant.” Here, Root stayed true to his conservative convictions and his patrician suspicion of popular participation in government. But he also claimed that the defects of a democratic foreign policy could be cured “by reason, by appeal to better instincts, by public discussion, by the ascertainment and dissemination of the true facts”, which were all practices that were honed in democratically governed polities. 2 Root’s address represented an attempt to spell out the conditions for a modern foreign policy fit for an age of mass democracy. Like many other liberal theorists of 1 Elihu Root, “The Effect of Democracy on International Law”, International Conciliation 4, no. 117 (1917/18): 160, 163; U.S. presidents have also embraced the democratic peace theory. Joan Hoff, A Faustian Foreign Policy From Woodrow Wilson to George W. Bush: Dreams of Perfectibility (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008), 143. 2 Root, “Effect of Democracy”: 161, 162, 163. 7 international relations, Root assumed that a well-thought-out framework for the conduct of the foreign relations of democratic states would lead to harmonious international relations and the absence of conflict. Democracy alone was not enough. Certain processes had to underpin the making of foreign policy, certain institutions had to be in place to “reason” and ascertain “the true facts”. Root did not spell out the exact shape of these processes and institutions but implied that a democracy needed to have a forum in which international relations could be rationally discussed. A successful Wall Street lawyer, Elihu Root was not just the president of the American Society of International Law but shuttled between his private practice in New York City and high political offices in Washington D.C. which included Secretary of War, Secretary of State and United States Senator. But next to his corporate and his public duties, Root also made space in his life for a third kind of career, that of philanthropic leader. As the first president of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Root presided over just the kind of organisation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Conclusion: How the GDR Came to Be
    Conclusion: How the GDR Came to Be Reckoned from war's end, it was ten years before Moscow gave real existing socialism in the GDR a guarantee of its continued existence. This underscores once again how little the results of Soviet policy on Germany corresponded to the original objectives and how seriously these objectives had been pursued. In the first decade after the war, many hundreds of independent witnesses confirm that Stalin strove for a democratic postwar Germany - a Germany democratic according to Western standards, which must be explicitly emphasized over against the perversion of the concept of democracy and the instrumentalization of anti-fascism in the GDR. 1 This Germany, which would have to of­ fer guarantees against renewed aggression and grant access to the re­ sources of the industrial regions in the western areas of the defeated Reich, was to be established in cooperation with the Western powers. To this purpose, the occupation forces were to remain in the Four­ Zone area for a limited time. At no point could Stalin imagine that the occupation forces would remain in Germany permanently. Dividing a nation fitted just as little with his views. Socialism, the socialist revolution in Germany, was for him a task of the future, one for the period after the realization of the Potsdam democratization programme. Even when in the spring of 1952, after many vain attempts to implement the Potsdam programme, he adjusted himself to a long coexistence of the two German states, he did not link this with any transition to a separate socialism: the GDR had simply wound up having to bide its time until the Cold War had been overcome, after which it would be possible to realize the agree­ ments reached at Potsdam.
    [Show full text]
  • 126Th National Congress, Journal of Proceedings, Philadelphia
    Commandery-in-Chief Journal of Proceedings: 126th National Congress, October 15, 2011, Union League, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Military Order of the Loyal Legion of the United States Military Order of the Loyal Legion of the United States Commandery-in-Chief Journal of Proceedings: 126th National Congress, October 15, 2011, UNION League, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania _______________________________________________________NATIONAL COMMANDERS-IN-CHIEF______________________________________________ Major General George Cadwallader, PA................... 1865-1879 Lt. General Nelson A. Miles, DC................................ 1919-1925 Colonel Joseph B. Daugherty, IN........... 1975-1977 Major General Winfield S. Hancock, PA. (Acting)…... 1879-1885 Rear Admiral Purnell F. Harrington, NY..................... 1925-1927 Thomas N. McCarter III, NY.................... 1977-1981 Major General Winfield S. Hancock, PA ................... 1885-1886 Master Robert M. Thompson, DC.............................. 1927-1930 Lt. Colonel Philip M. Watrous, PA......... 1981-1983 Bvt. Major General Rutherford B. Hayes, OH............ 1886-1886 Brigadier General Samuel W. Fountain, PA…….…… 1930-1930 Alexander P. Hartnett, PA...................... 1983-1985 Lt. General Philip H. Sheridan, DC........................... 1886-1888 Bvt. Major George Mason, IL.................................... 1930-1931 William H. Upham, Jr., WI.................... 1985-1989 Bvt. Major General Rutherford B. Hayes, OH............ 1888-1893 Captain William P. Wright, IL...................................
    [Show full text]
  • German Politics and the 'Jewish Question', 1914-1919
    German Politics and the 'Jewish Question', 1914-1919 Lucia Juliette Linares Darwin College Dissertation submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2019 PREFACE I hereby declare that this dissertation is the result of my own work and includes nothing which is the outcome of work done in collaboration except as declared in the preface and specified in the text. It is not substantially the same as any other work that I have submitted, or, is being concurrently submitted for a degree or diploma or other qualification at the University of Cambridge or any other university or similar institution except as declared in the preface and specified in the text. I further state that no substantial part of my dissertation has already been submitted, or, is being concurrently submitted for any such degree, diploma or other qualification at the University of Cambridge or any other university or similar institution except as declared in the preface and specified in the text. It does not exceed the prescribed word limit for the Faculty of History. All translations are my own unless specified in the text. i ABSTRACT German Politics and the 'Jewish Question', 1914-1919 Lucia Juliette Linares The First World War confronted German politicians with a range of unprecedented, vital questions in the spheres of domestic as well as foreign policy. As the fortunes of war shifted, so did borders, populations and national allegiances. In a period of acute and almost constant political crisis, the German government faced issues concerning citizenship, minority rights, religious identity, nationhood and statehood. My dissertation analyses these issues through the prism of the so-called 'Jewish Question'.
    [Show full text]
  • Home of the World Trade Organization Geneva Foreword
    Home of the World Trade Organization Geneva Foreword THIS BOOK ON THE HISTORY AND WORKS OF ART of the Centre William Rappard of the works, donated by countries and labour would not have been possible ten years ago. The reason for this is simple: despite unions during the ILO era, had been either the building’s rich past, illustrious occupants and proud appearance, it was a little concealed or removed. In restoring these works, antiquated and not particularly well known or even well liked. Located in a magnificent the WTO took on an identity that was not strictly park on the shore of Lake Geneva, with a spectacular view of the Alps, it has a speaking its own, but of which its staff and somewhat turbulent past. Members have become proud. AS THE FIRST BUILDING IN GENEVA built to house an international organization, THE WORKS OF ART PRESENTED IN THIS BOOK , many of which have been the Centre William Rappard, named after a leading Swiss diplomat, was originally given a new lease of life by the WTO, display a wide variety of styles and techniques. the headquarters of the International Labour Office (ILO). The ILO left the building Many of them represent labour in its various forms – an allusion, of course, to the in 1940 during the Second World War, but later moved back in 1948, only to leave activities of the ILO, the building’s original occupant. Other works, such as Eduardo for good in 1975 when the Centre William Rappard was handed over to its new Chicharro’s “Pygmalion”, are more unusual.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    83  Jonathan Zatlin links: Jonathan Zatlin rechts: Guilt by Association Guilt by Association Julius Barmat and German Democracy* Abstract Although largely forgotten today, the so-called “Barmat Affair” resulted in the longest trial in the Weimar Republic’s short history and one of its most heated scandals. The antidemocratic right seized upon the ties that Julius Barmat, a Jewish businessman of Ukrainian provenance, maintained to prominent socialists to discredit Weimar by equat- ing democracy with corruption, corruption with Jews, and Jews with socialists. The left responded to the right’s antidemocratic campaign with reasoned refutations of the idea that democracy inevitably involved graft. Few socialist or liberal politicians, however, responded to the right’s portrayal of Weimar as “Jewish.” The failure of the left to identify antisemitism as a threat to democracy undermined attempts to democratize the German judiciary and ultimately German society itself. And then it started like a guilty thing Upon a fearful summons.1 In a spectacular operation on New Year’s Eve 1924, the Berlin state prosecutor’s office sent some 100 police officers to arrest Julius Barmat and two of his four brothers. With an eye toward capturing headlines, the prosecutors treated Barmat as a dangerous criminal, sending some 20 policemen to arrest him, his wife, and his 13-year old son in his villa in Schwanenwerder, an exclusive neighbourhood on the Wannsee. The police even brought along a patrol boat to underscore their concern that Barmat might try to escape custody via the river Havel. The arrests of Barmat’s leading managers and alleged co-conspirators over the next few days were similarly sensational and faintly ridiculous.
    [Show full text]
  • The Berlin Olympics: Sports, Anti-Semitism, and Propaganda in Nazi Germany Nathan W
    Student Publications Student Scholarship Spring 2016 The Berlin Olympics: Sports, Anti-Semitism, and Propaganda in Nazi Germany Nathan W. Cody Gettysburg College Follow this and additional works at: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/student_scholarship Part of the European History Commons, Political History Commons, Social History Commons, and the Sports Studies Commons Share feedback about the accessibility of this item. Cody, Nathan W., "The Berlin Olympics: Sports, Anti-Semitism, and Propaganda in Nazi Germany" (2016). Student Publications. 434. https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/student_scholarship/434 This is the author's version of the work. This publication appears in Gettysburg College's institutional repository by permission of the copyright owner for personal use, not for redistribution. Cupola permanent link: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/student_scholarship/ 434 This open access student research paper is brought to you by The uC pola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of The uC pola. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Berlin Olympics: Sports, Anti-Semitism, and Propaganda in Nazi Germany Abstract The aN zis utilized the Berlin Olympics of 1936 as anti-Semitic propaganda within their racial ideology. When the Nazis took power in 1933 they immediately sought to coordinate all aspects of German life, including sports. The process of coordination was designed to Aryanize sport by excluding non-Aryans and promoting sport as a means to prepare for military training. The 1936 Olympic Games in Berlin became the ideal platform for Hitler and the Nazis to display the physical superiority of the Aryan race. However, the exclusion of non-Aryans prompted a boycott debate that threatened Berlin’s position as host.
    [Show full text]
  • Did Weimar Have a National Ethnic Policy? 57
    Did Weimar Have a National Ethnic Policy? R. Carey Goodman Ill Statesmen and citizens of the Weimar Republic expressed a concern for their ethnic kinsmen outside German borders that was unprecedented in the Reich's history. This concern had both private and official manifestations. The private movement, often called the Auslandsdeutsche movement, spawned a multitude of organizations and a flood of literature on the subject. Government activity included diplomatic initiatives and spending hundreds of millions of marks.' This paper analyzes the official aspect: the Weimar government's attention to Germans outside the state's borders, and more specifically, to those inhabiting territory ceded under the terms of the Versailles Treaty. The focus is on the development and nature of Weimar policy towards these Germans, that is, Weimar's national ethnic or Deutsch­ tum policy. 2 Furthermore, such a study reveals new evidence for the ongoing inquiry as to whether Weimar Germany's foreign policy was revisionist, that is, whether it sought to revise the Treaty of Versailles's territorial provisions, or not. This concern for Germans abroad and the ensuing need for a policy towards them resulted primarily from two events: the First World War and the peace terms arranged in 1919. The First World War was the "hour of birth" of the Auslandsdeutsche movement. 3 Before 1914 the Reich government essen­ tially neglected foreign Germans, and private initiatives concentrated on cultural support, especially for German schools. 4 During and after the war, the German public's new-found attachment to Germans outside the Reich's borders was expressed in the revival of nineteenth-century pan-German organizations such as the Verein fi.ir das Deutschtum im Ausland and the Alldeutscher Verband, and in the creation of new organizations like the R.
    [Show full text]
  • Inauguration of John Grier Hibben
    INAUGURATION O F J O H N G R I E R H I B B E N PRESIDENT OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY AT RDAY MAY S U , THE ELEVENTH MCMXII INAUGURATION O F J O H N G R I E R H I B B E N PRESIDENT OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY SATUR AY MAY THE ELE ENTH D , V MCMXII PROGRAMME AN D ORDER OF ACADEMI C PROCESSION INAUGURAL EXERCISES at eleven o ’ clock March from Athalia Mendelssohn Veni Creator Spiritus Palestrina SC RI PTUR E AN D P RAYE R HENRY. VAN DYKE Murray Professor of English Literature ADM I N I STRATI ON O F T H E OATH O F OFF I CE MAHLON PITNEY Associat e Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States D ELIVE RY O F T H E CHARTE R AN D KEYS JOHN AIKMAN STEWART e E " - n S nior Trustee, President pro tempore of Pri ceton University I NAUGURAL ADD RE SS JOHN GRIER HIBBEN President of Princeton University CONFE RR ING O F HONORARY D EGREES O Il EDWARD D OUGLASS W H I T E T h e Chief Justice of the United States WILLIAM HOWARD TAFT President of the United States T H E O N E HUND REDTH P SALM Sung in unison by choir and assembly standing Accompaniment of trumpets BENED I CT I ON EDWIN STEVENS LINES Bishop of Newark Postlude Svendsen (The audience ls re"uested to stand while the academic "rocession ls enterlng and "assing out) ALUMNI LUNCHEON T h e Gymnasium ’ at "uarter before one O clock ’ M .
    [Show full text]
  • The Story of the Olympic Hymn: the Poet and His Composer
    The Story of the Olympic Hymn: the poet and his composer By Volker Kluge The Olympic Hymn by Thereafter a jury made up of IOC and US representatives Richard Strauss was would choose the winner. In fact, the prize jury consisted recognised by the only of Americans. Their countryman, pianist Walter IOC in 1936 as official. Bradley Keeler 4 was awarded first prize.5 As the Organising Bradley Keeler’s work, written in the style of an Anglo- Committee of the American church hymn, was played on 30th July 1932 at XI Olympiad was not the opening ceremony of the Games of the Xth Olympiad, in the position of as the Olympic flag rose to the top of the mast. For this the paying Strauss the Organising Committee had assembled a band with 300 10,000 marks he musicians: the Olympic choir – 1200 women and men demanded, it had the – sang the lyrics composed by Louis F. Benson. The text, score printed in large which called on the athletes no longer to fear the hand quantities and sold of the tyrant and to keep faith with liberty, was printed them for one mark. in the day’s programme so many spectators sang along.6 The profit benefited The hymn proved popular, which is why the poet the composer, but Alfred von Kessel translated it into German.7 The the lyricist was left translation was probably intended for the IOC Session empty-handed. in Vienna, but when this was opened on 7th June 1933 in the Academy of Sciences, the choir did not perform Photos: Deutsches Literatur- archiv Marbach, Volker Kluge Kessel’s text but a revised version which was one verse Archive shorter.
    [Show full text]
  • October, 1937
    tiffin Hall OCTOBER, 1937 1937 Fall Athletic Schedule 1937 V arsity Football V arsity Soccer Sept. 25 Middlebury Home Oct. 9 Dartmouth Home Oct. 2 Columbia Away 13 Yale Away 9 Univ. of Vermont Away 23 Brown Away 16 Bowdoin Home 27 Army Away 23 Tufts Away 30 Union Home 30 Hamilton Home Nov. 6 Wesleyan Away Nov. 6 Wesleyan Away 13 Amherst Home 13 Amherst Home Freshman Football V arsity Cross Country Oct. 16 Middlebury Home Oct. 16 Union Home 23 Milford School Home 23 Middlebury Away 30 Union Home 30 Colgate Home Nov. 6 Wesleyan Away Nov. 6 Univ. of Vermdht Away 13 Amherst Home 13 Little Three Home Freshman Soccer Freshman Cross Country Oct. 16 Deerfield Away 23 Williston Home Oct. 30 Union Home Nov. 6 Wesleyan Away Nov. 6 R. P. I. Home 13 Amherst Home 13 Little Three Home Published by Williams College, Williamstown, Mass., five times a year: October, December, February, M ay, aud July. Entered at the Post Office in Williamstown, Mass., as second class matter under the Act of Congress, August 2b, 1912, o J ames Phinney Baxter, 3rd Class of 1914 President of Williams College WILLIAMS ALUMNI WILLIAMSTO WN, MASSACHUSETTS VOLUME X X X OCTOBER, 1937 NUMBER 1 P r e s i d e n t B a x t e r president as one who sympathetically, Greeting from the Society of Alumni understandingly, takes pride in those alumni accomplishments that add lustre “ The shortest and surest way to live to Williams and justify her teaching and with honor in the world is to be in care.
    [Show full text]
  • Heft 4 Oktober 1997
    VIERTELJAHRSHEFTE FÜR Zeitgeschichte Im Auftrag des Instituts für Zeitgeschichte München herausgegeben von KARL DIETRICH BRACHER HANS-PETER SCHWARZ HORST MÖLLER in Verbindung mit Theodor Eschenburg, Rudolf v. Albertini, Dietrich Geyer, Hans Mommsen, Arnulf Baring und Gerhard A. Ritter Redaktion: Manfred Kittel, Udo Wengst, Jürgen Zarusky Chefredakteur: Hans Woller Stellvertreter: Christian Hartmann Institut für Zeitgeschichte, Leonrodstr. 46b, 80636 München, Tel. 1268 80, Fax 12317 27 45. Jahrgang Heft 4 Oktober 1997 INHALTSVERZEICHNIS AUFSÄTZE Jochen Stelkens Machtwechsel in Ost-Berlin. Der Sturz Walter Ulbrichts 1971 503 Anja Heuß Die „Beuteorganisation" des Auswärtigen Amtes. Das Sonderkommando Künsberg und der Kultur­ gutraub in der Sowjetunion 535 Gilad Margalit Die deutsche Zigeunerpolitik nach 1945 557 Rolf Steininger Großbritannien und der Vietnamkrieg 1964/65 . 589 II Inhaltsverzeichnis DOKUMENTATION Bert Hoppe Von Schleicher zu Hitler. Dokumente zum Konflikt zwischen dem Reichs­ landbund und der Regierung Schleicher in den letzten Wochen der Weimarer Republik 629 NOTIZ Das TransCoop-Programm 659 ABSTRACTS 661 MITARBEITER DIESES HEFTES 663 Verlag und Anzeigenverwaltung: R. Oldenbourg Verlag GmbH, Rosenheimer Straße 145, 81671 München. Für den Inhalt verantwortlich: Horst Möller; für den Anzeigenteil: Suzan Hahnemann. Erscheinungsweise: Vierteljährlich. Bezugspreis incl. gesetzlicher MWSt 1997: Jahresabonnement Inland DM 92,40 (DM 78,- + DM 14,40 Versandspesen); Österreich öS 693,- (569,- + 124,- Versandspesen); Schweiz und übriges Aus­ land DM/sFr 94,80 (78,- + 16,80 Versandspesen). Studentenabonnement (nur Inland) DM 74,40 (60,- + 14,40 Versandspesen); Einzelheft DM 26,-, öS 190,-, sFR 26,- + Versandspesen. Bezieher der Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte sind berechtigt, die der Zeit­ schrift angeschlossene Schriftenreihe der Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte (2 Bände im Jahr) im Abonne­ ment zum Vorzugspreis von DM 52,- zuzüglich Versandkosten zu beziehen.
    [Show full text]
  • Nine Lives of Neoliberalism
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Plehwe, Dieter (Ed.); Slobodian, Quinn (Ed.); Mirowski, Philip (Ed.) Book — Published Version Nine Lives of Neoliberalism Provided in Cooperation with: WZB Berlin Social Science Center Suggested Citation: Plehwe, Dieter (Ed.); Slobodian, Quinn (Ed.); Mirowski, Philip (Ed.) (2020) : Nine Lives of Neoliberalism, ISBN 978-1-78873-255-0, Verso, London, New York, NY, https://www.versobooks.com/books/3075-nine-lives-of-neoliberalism This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/215796 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative
    [Show full text]