DOCSLIB.ORG

Methodological Guide for the Development of Inventories Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Methodological Guide for the Development of Inventories Of BASEL CONVENTION METHODOLOGICAL GUIDE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF INVENTORIES OF HAZARDOUS WASTES AND OTHER WASTES UNDER THE BASEL CONVENTION BASEL CONVENTION METHODOLOGICAL GUIDE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF INVENTORIES OF HAZARDOUS WASTES AND OTHER WASTES UNDER THE BASEL CONVENTION CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................8 2. OBJECTIVE AND ORGANIZATION OF THE GUIDE .......................................................9 3. NATIONAL REPORTING UNDER THE BASEL CONVENTION .......................................9 4. ROLES AND TYPES OF INVENTORIES ......................................................................... 11 4.1 FIRST GENERATION INVENTORIES .......................................................................................11 4.2 SECOND GENERATION INVENTORIES ...................................................................................11 4.3 USING INVENTORY DATA FOR NATIONAL REPORTING ...........................................................15 5. TEN STEPS TOWARDS A NATIONAL INVENTORY ..................................................... 15 5.1 STEP 1. INTERPRETATION OF DEFINITIONS ...........................................................................17 5.1.1 DEFINITION OF WASTE ..............................................................................................17 5.1.2 DEFINITION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE ..........................................................................17 5.1.3 DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN WASTES AND OTHER RELEASES ..........................................18 5.2 STEP 2. CLASSIFICATION OF WASTE STREAMS ......................................................................18 5.3 STEP 3. DEFINING THE SCOPE OF THE INVENTORY ................................................................20 5.4 STEP 4. IDENTIFYING MAJOR WASTE GENERATORS ...............................................................20 5.5 STEP 5. COLLECTING SITE SPECIFIC DATA .............................................................................21 5.6 STEP 6. VERIFYING SITE SPECIFIC DATA ................................................................................21 5.7 STEP 7. CALCULATING NATIONAL SUMMARIES .....................................................................22 5.8 STEP 8. DATA ON WASTE DISPOSAL AND RECOVERY .............................................................22 5.9 STEP 9. DATA ON IMPORT AND EXPORT OF HAZARDOUS WASTES AND OTHER WASTES ............23 5.10 STEP 10. ASSESSMENT OF RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS .....................................................24 6. METHODS FOR CALCULATING HAZARDOUS WASTES GENERATION IN THE MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY ........................................................................ 24 7. INVENTORIES OF SELECTED WASTE STREAMS ........................................................ 28 7.1 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................28 7.2 WASTE ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT ..............................................................29 7.3 WASTE MINERAL OIL AND OILY WASTES ..............................................................................29 7.4 HOUSEHOLD WASTE AND RESIDUES FROM THEIR INCINERATION ...........................................30 7.4.1 HOUSEHOLD WASTES IN THE CONTEXT OF THE BASEL CONVENTION .............................30 7.4.2 RESIDUES FROM THE INCINERATION OF HOUSEHOLD WASTE ........................................31 7.4.3 HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE .............................................................................31 7.5 HEALTH-CARE WASTE ........................................................................................................32 7.6 SMALL-SCALE INDUSTRY AND THE INFORMAL SECTOR .........................................................33 7.7 ACCIDENTAL CHEMICAL OR HAZARDOUS WASTE RELEASES ..................................................34 7.8 HIGH VOLUME, LOW HAZARD WASTES ................................................................................34 8. HAZARDOUS WASTE AUDITS AND CASE STUDIES ................................................. 35 8.1 BASIC INFORMATION ........................................................................................................35 8.2 INPUT-OUTPUT BALANCES ................................................................................................35 8.3 WASTE DATA ....................................................................................................................35 8.4 WASTE SAMPLES ..............................................................................................................36 8.5 ACCESS TO PLANT SPECIFIC INFORMATION .........................................................................36 9. INVENTORIES BASED ON COMPLIANCE MONITORING .......................................... 36 9.1 CHALLENGES IN INVENTORIES BASED ON COMPLIANCE MONITORING ...................................38 9.2 CHALLENGES IN QUALITY CONTROL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE DATABASES ..............................39 10. REFERENCES ................................................................................................................... 40 4 | ANNEXES ANNEX 1A: EXTRACT OF THE REVISED QUESTIONNAIRE ON “TRANSMISSION OF INFORMATION” ................. 43 ANNEX 1B: EXTRACT OF THE REVISED FORMAT FOR NATIONAL REPORTING .......................................................... 50 ANNEX 2: EXAMPLES OF POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS WASTE STREAMS .................................................................. 55 ANNEX 3: TEMPLATE FOR COLLECTING WASTE DATA FROM GENERATORS IN THE INDUSTRIAL SECTOR . 62 ANNEX 4: CASE STUDY: PCB INVENTORY FROM ELECTRIC APPLIANCES ................................................................. 66 ANNEX 5: CASE: HOUSEHOLD SURVEY AND WASTE CHARACTERIZATION FOR NUKUHETULU, TONGA .... 70 FIGURES FIGURE 1: ROLE OF FIRST GENERATION INVENTORIES IN POLICY DEVELOPMENT .............................................. 12 FIGURE 2: INTERACTION OF SECOND GENERATION INVENTORIES WITH WASTE POLICY ELEMENTS .......... 13 FIGURE 3: TEN STEPS TOWARDS A NATIONAL INVENTORY OF HAZARDOUS AND OTHER WASTES ............. 16 FIGURE 4: ROADMAP FOR FIRST GENERATION INVENTORIES ....................................................................................... 25 FIGURE 5: ROADMAP FOR SECOND GENERATION INVENTORIES ................................................................................. 37 TABLES TABLE 1: EXAMPLES OF TYPES OF INVENTORIES .............................................................................................................. 14 TABLE 2: EXAMPLES OF WASTE FACTORS FOR SOME PETROCHEMICALS AND PLASTIC MATERIALS ........ 27 TABLE 3: OTHER HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATING SECTORS .................................................................................. 29 TABLE 4: WASTE GENERATION FACTORS FOR WASTE ENGINE OILS ......................................................................... 30 TABLE 5: CURRENT WASTE GENERATION PER CAPITA AND BY REGION.................................................................. 31 TABLE 6: CURRENT WASTE GENERATION PER CAPITA AND BY INCOME LEVEL ................................................... 31 TABLE 7: HEALTH-CARE WASTES FROM A CASE STUDY IN FINLAND ....................................................................... 33 TABLE 8: WASTE GENERATION FACTORS FOR TAILINGS ................................................................................................ 34 | 5 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS AMAP Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme BREF Best Available Techniques Reference Document BCRC Basel Convention Regional Center BCRC-SEA Basel Convention Regional Centre for South-East Asia COP Conference of the Parties CPCB Central Pollution Control Board of India DEFRA Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs of the United Kingdom EIA Environmental impact assessment EIPPCB European Integrated Pollution and Prevention Control Bureau EPA Environmental Protection Agency E-PRTR European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register ESM Environmentally sound management EU European Union E-Waste Waste electrical and electronic equipment GDP Gross domestic product GIS Geographic information system GHS Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals HIV Human immunodeficiency virus HHW Household hazardous waste HS Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System ICC Committee for Administering the Mechanism for Promoting Implementation and Compliance with the Basel Convention ICT Information and communication technology ISIC International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities MAP Mediterranean Action Plan MSDS Material safety data sheets MSW Municipal solid waste OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development OEWG Open-ended working group PCB Polychlorinated biphenyl PCT Polychlorinated terphenyl PRTR Pollution release and transfer register PVC Polyvinyl chloride SBC Secretariat of the Basel Convention USA United States of America WCO World Customs Organization WHO World Health Organization 1. INTRODUCTION 1. Parties to the Basel Convention are required under Article 13, paragraph 3, of the Convention to transmit each year to the Conference of the Parties, through the Secretariat, information concerning the measures they have taken towards its implementation and certain other information related to the subject matter of the Convention. In order to assist parties to
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Recycling Codes
    Recycling Codes: What they mean? TYPE OF PLASTIC CHARACTERISTICS APPLICATIONS Polyethylene Clear, tough, solvent Carbonated soft drink Terephthalate resistant, often us as a bottles, pillow and sleeping PET fibre bag filling, textile fibres High Density Hard to semi-flexible, Crinkly shopping bags, Polyethylene HDPE waxy surface, opaque, freezer bags, milk bottles, melts at 135°C bleach bottles, buckets, rigid agricultural pipe, milk crates Unplasticized Hard rigid, can be clear, Electrical conduit, plumbing Polyvinyl Chloride can be solvent welded pipes and fittings, blister UPVC packs, clear cordial and fruit juice bottles Plasticized Polyvinyl Flexible, clear, elastic, Garden hose, shoe soles, Chloride PPVC can be solvent welded cable sheating, blood bags and tubing, watch straps Low Density Soft, flexible, waxy Garbage bags squeeze Polyethylene LDPE surface translucent, bottles, black irrigation tube, withstands solvents black mulch film, garbage bins Polypropylene PP Hard but still flexible, Potato crisps bags, drinking waxy surface, melts at straws, microwave ware, 145°C, translucent, plastic kettles, plastic withstands solvents. garden settings, baby baths, Very versatile material plastic hinged lunch boxes with many applications Polystyrene Clear, glassy, rigid, Plastic cutlery, imitation PS brittle, opaque semi- 'crystal glassware', low cost tough, melts at 95°C. brittle toys Affected by fats and solvents Expanded Foamed, light weight, Panel insulation, produces Polystyrene EPS energy absorbing, heat boxes, protective packaging insulating for fragile items OTHER : Examples are polyamide, acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), acrylic, nylon, polyurethane (PU) and phenolics..
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Incineration Medical Waste Treatment Technologies
    Non-Incineration Medical Waste Treatment Technologies A Resource for Hospital Administrators, Facility Managers, Health Care Professionals, Environmental Advocates, and Community Members August 2001 Health Care Without Harm 1755 S Street, N.W. Unit 6B Washington, DC 20009 Phone: 202.234.0091 www.noharm.org Health Care Without Harm 1755 S Street, N.W. Suite 6B Washington, DC 20009 Phone: 202.234.0091 www.noharm.org Printed with soy-based inks on Rolland Evolution, a 100% processed chlorine-free paper. Non-Incineration Medical Waste Treatment Technologies A Resource for Hospital Administrators, Facility Managers, Health Care Professionals, Environmental Advocates, and Community Members August 2001 Health Care Without Harm www.noharm.org Preface THE FOUR LAWS OF ECOLOGY . Meanwhile, many hospital staff, such as Hollie Shaner, RN of Fletcher-Allen Health Care in Burlington, Ver- 1. Everything is connected to everything else, mont, were appalled by the sheer volumes of waste and 2. Everything must go somewhere, the lack of reduction and recycling efforts. These indi- viduals became champions within their facilities or 3. Nature knows best, systems to change the way that waste was being managed. 4. There is no such thing as a free lunch. Barry Commoner, The Closing Circle, 1971 In the spring of 1996, more than 600 people – most of them community activists – gathered in Baton Rouge, Up to now, there has been no single resource that pro- Louisiana to attend the Third Citizens Conference on vided a good frame of reference, objectively portrayed, of Dioxin and Other Hormone-Disrupting Chemicals. The non-incineration technologies for the treatment of health largest workshop at the conference was by far the one care wastes.
    [Show full text]
  • "Shifting the Pollution Problem: Recycling Plastics in Southern China'
    "Shifting the Pollution Problem: Recycling Plastics in Southern China' By K athryn Palko A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the M aster of Arts in International Development Studies at Saint Mary's University Halifax, Nova Scotia November 18,2005 © Kathryn Palko Approved By: Dr. Anne Marie Dalton Supervisor Dr. John Devlin 1st Reader Dr. Julia Sagebien External Examiner Library and Bibliothèque et 1^1 Archives Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de l'édition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre référence ISBN: 0-494-15259-1 Our file Notre référence ISBN: 0-494-15259-1 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library permettant à la Bibliothèque et Archives and Archives Canada to reproduce,Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve,sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par télécommunication ou par l'Internet, prêter, telecommunication or on the Internet,distribuer et vendre des thèses partout dans loan, distribute and sell theses le monde, à des fins commerciales ou autres, worldwide, for commercial or non­ sur support microforme, papier, électronique commercial purposes, in microform,et/ou autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriété du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in et des droits moraux qui protège cette thèse. this thesis. Neither the thesis Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels de nor substantial extracts from it celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés ou autrement may be printed or otherwise reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Types of Plastic and Their Recycle Codes | Quality Logo Products®
    7/24/2018 Types of Plastic and Their Recycle Codes | Quality Logo Products® Product Search Your privacy will be protected by redirecting your search to Search Encrypt. Learn More X ALL ABOUT MATERIALS Types of Plastic and Their Recycle Codes Other Lessons in This Course Types of Plastic Plastic is an essential component of many items, including water bottles, combs, and beverage containers. Knowing the difference, as well as the SPI codes, will help you make more informed decisions about recycling. The seven types of plastic include: Polyethylene Terephthalate (PETE or PET) High-Density Polyethylene (HDPE) Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Miscellaneous plastics (includes: polycarbonate, polylactide, acrylic, acrylonitrile butadiene, styrene, fiberglass, and nylon) When it comes to promotional giveaways, and even items we use around the house, there is no material more important than plastic. The same can be said for the items we use at the office. Most of our supplies contain at least a little bit of this material. In fact, humans have thus far produced 9.1 billion tons of plastic! For the sake of the environment, it’s important to know the different types of plastic and their uses, as well as the resin identification codes found on each for the sake of recycling. Recycling Codes for Plastic Understanding the different types of plastic can help consumers like you make more informed decisions related to your health and the environment. It’s important to become familiar with an item’s SPI (Society of the Plastics Industry) code, which is also known as a resin identification number and is used to classify the different types of plastic.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Distributed Recycling with Additive Manufacturing of PET Flake Feedstocks
    materials Article Towards Distributed Recycling with Additive Manufacturing of PET Flake Feedstocks Helen A. Little 1, Nagendra G. Tanikella 2, Matthew J. Reich 2, Matthew J. Fiedler 1, Samantha L. Snabes 1 and Joshua M. Pearce 2,3,4,* 1 re:3D Inc., 1100 Hercules STE 220, Houston, TX 77058, USA; [email protected] (H.A.L.); [email protected] (M.J.F.); [email protected] (S.L.S.) 2 Department of Material Science and Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931, USA; [email protected] (N.G.T.); [email protected] (M.J.R.) 3 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931, USA 4 Department of Electronics and Nanoengineering, School of Electrical Engineering, Aalto University, 00076 Espoo, Finland * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-906-487-1466 Received: 28 July 2020; Accepted: 22 September 2020; Published: 25 September 2020 Abstract: This study explores the potential to reach a circular economy for post-consumer Recycled Polyethylene Terephthalate (rPET) packaging and bottles by using it as a Distributed Recycling for Additive Manufacturing (DRAM) feedstock. Specifically, for the first time, rPET water bottle flake is processed using only an open source toolchain with Fused Particle Fabrication (FPF) or Fused Granular Fabrication (FGF) processing rather than first converting it to filament. In this study, first the impact of granulation, sifting, and heating (and their sequential combination) is quantified on the shape and size distribution of the rPET flakes. Then 3D printing tests were performed on the rPET flake with two different feed systems: an external feeder and feed tube augmented with a motorized auger screw, and an extruder-mounted hopper that enables direct 3D printing.
    [Show full text]
  • Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers in the Great Lakes Basin
    Attachment 2 WQB Appearance POLYBROMINATED DIPHENYL ETHERS IN THE GREAT LAKES BASIN FINAL REPORT October 30, 2015 SUBMITTED TO: INTERNATIONAL JOINT COMMISSION - GREAT LAKES WATER QUALITY BOARD LEGACY ISSUES WORKING GROUP SUBMITTED BY DUNCAN BURY CONSULTING 193 Cowley Avenue, Ottawa, ON, K1Y 0G8 [email protected]; (613) 729-0499 In association with and Attachment 2 WQB Appearance This page intentionally left blank. Attachment 2 WQB Appearance ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The consulting team would like to acknowledge the contributions and information provided by the following government officials, experts and stakeholders who kindly agreed to be interviewed for this report: Chris Affeldt, Pollution Prevention Program Analyst, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality David Bell, Research Scientist, Environmental Impact Analysis Unit, Minnesota Department of Health David Berryman, Water Quality Analyst, Québec Ministry of Sustainable Development, Environment and the Fight against Climate Change Cindy Coutts, President, Canada, SIMS Recycling Solutions Miriam Diamond, Professor, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Sean De Vries, Director Recycling Qualification Office, Electronic Products Recycling Association Dave Foulkes, Environmental Specialist, Office of Compliance Assistance and Pollution Prevention (OCAPP), Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Brent Goetz, Inspector, Hazardous Waste, Northwest District Office, Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Bradley Grams, Federal Chemical Programs Coordinator, Land and Chemicals
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal for Franchise Solid Waste Services City of Goleta
    Proposal for Franchise Solid Waste Services City of Goleta March 15, 2018 On August 15, 2017 Council gave direction to bring back a proposal for a ten year solid waste contract extension within twelve months for consideration. In compliance with that request, MarBorg Industries is pleased to present the City of Goleta with a Proposal for a ten year extension to the Franchise Solid Waste Services Contract for the City of Goleta. MarBorg is a long-standing partner of the City of Goleta, and hopes to continue this relationship over the next decade as solid waste regulations and handling procedures within California and Santa Barbara County evolve. This proposal builds on the current franchise agreement, maintaining all services that benefit both the Goleta rate-payers and the City of Goleta, while providing enhancements for all parties as well. These contract enhancements include: Reduced Rates • Residential Rates will be reduced by 15% from current rates. • Multi-Family Rates for can & cart customers will be reduced by 15% from current rates. • Commercial and Multi-Family bin rates will be reduced by 5% from current rates. • All rate reductions are proposed be implemented July 1, 2018, allowing customers to enjoy rate reductions prior to the end of our current agreement in 2021. • These rate reductions will save City ratepayers over $2,000,000 through the next three years of our current contract period, and will continue to serve as a rate reduction throughout the extended ten year term saving customers another $7,000,000 from current rates. Increased City Recycling Education Payment • MarBorg Industries is currently paying $25,000 per year to a City recycling education fund.
    [Show full text]
  • Biohazardous Waste Management Plan
    BIOHAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN MARCH 2021 Environmental Health and Safety Department University of Washington Box 354400 Seattle, WA 98195-4400 Phone: 206.543.7262 FAX: 206.543.3351 www.ehs.washington.edu FOREWARD Page 2 of 22 ￜ March 2021 FOREWARD The University of Washington Infectious Waste Committee and the Institutional Biosafety Committee have approved and provided guidance in developing and improving this Biohazardous Waste Management Plan. The Plan has been reviewed and is endorsed by the Senior Director of the Environmental Health and Safety Department (EH&S). ______________________________________________________________________________________ Katia Harb, Senior Director, Environmental Health & Safety Department (EH&S) Environmental Health & Safety | www.ehs.washington.edu | BIOHAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS March 2021 ￜ Page 3 of 22 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWARD .......................................................................................................................................................... 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ......................................................................................................................................... 3 SCOPE .................................................................................................................................................................. 5 PURPOSE ............................................................................................................................................................. 6
    [Show full text]
  • A Pharmaceutical and Sharps Waste Compliance Service for Your Facilities
    A pharmaceutical and sharps waste compliance service for your facilities Hospital leaders know that often staff do not correctly segregate pharmaceutical waste from sharps waste. A comingled pharmaceutical and sharps waste compliance service introduced in the Pacific Northwest a year ago takes this drug waste and puts both waste streams into one container that can be in the patient room and that helps keep hospitals compliant. Only about five percent of most hospitals’ regulated medical waste streams are RCRA hazardous pharmaceuticals. This leaves the remaining 95 percent of most hospital formularies deemed Washington State Only Dangerous Pharmaceuticals (a.k.a. non- RCRA) to be managed by staff who want to do the right thing. First they must understand the importance of disposing non-RCRA drugs in a responsible place for proper processing, as Virginia Mason in Seattle does with approximately 2,000 drugs in its formulary. There is also the challenge of maintaining a safe work environment and being OSHA compliant with sharps disposal. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimate that are 385,000 healthcare worker (HCW) needlestick and sharps-related injuries annually in hospitals nationwide.1 Stericycle’s Rx Waste Comingle program enables staff to dispose of both non-RCRA pharmaceutical waste and sharps waste in one container. This makes it easy on staff to quickly dispose of both waste streams conveniently while in patient rooms and helps reduce needlestick injuries during disposal. Monthly comingle reports make it easy for healthcare leaders to track and budget for appropriately managing these two important waste streams. The comingle program being offered in the Pacific Northwest helps healthcare facilities increase regulatory compliance with The Joint Commission, EPA, DOT, OSHA and, specifically in the Pacific Northwest, the Department of Ecology.
    [Show full text]
  • Plastic Bag Recycling Program Faqs
    Plastic Bag Recycling Program FAQs What type of plastic is recyclable under the Plastic Bag Recycling Program? Polyethylene plastic film type material is what we are looking for in this program. These items are generally a softer, somewhat “stretchy” plastic, usually with a less shiny finish. For example, if you were to try to tear a grocery bag or dry-cleaning bag, it would stretch and pull as it tears, giving it a ragged edge. If labeled, it would have a 2 or 4 recycling symbol. What type of plastic is not acceptable under the Plastic Bag Recycling Program? Plastics that are harder and “crinkly” that would give a straight finish when torn. Any plastics that have a 1,3,5,6, or 7 recycling symbols. These plastics are made with products that are not accepted in our program. Are plastic bottles, caps and rings on six-pack beverages acceptable? No, these items are a different type of plastic and are not recyclable in this program. Cereal bags are included on the list. Does this mean the plastic bags from regular cardboard boxes of cereal and not the plastic bags that some bargain brand cereals come in? Yes, that’s correct. Only the plastic bags inside the cardboard cereal bags are acceptable. Are used FoodSaver bags, that have been adequately rinsed out, accepted? No, these bags are made from a polyethylene and nylon blend. The nylon makes them unacceptable. Some breads come in regular plastic bread bags but have a stiffer, sort of cellophane-like, inner bag. Are the inner wrappers accepted too? No, the inner cellophane type material is not accepted because it is a different type of plastic.
    [Show full text]
  • BC-13/6: Technical Guidelines on Incineration on Land (D10) and on Specially Engineered Landfill (D5)
    BC-13/6: Technical guidelines on incineration on land (D10) and on specially engineered landfill (D5) The Conference of the Parties, Having considered the work programme of the Open-ended Working Group for the biennium 2016–2017, set out in the annex to decision BC-12/19, the outcome of the tenth meeting of the Open-ended Working Group and the results of the online survey to assess the relevance and utility of the Basel Convention documents related to environmentally sound management, 1. Recalls decision III/13, by which it adopted the technical guidelines for the environmentally sound management of wastes subject to the Basel Convention, including on incineration on land (D10) and on specially engineered landfill (D5); 2. Takes note of the recommendation made by the Open-Ended Working Group at its tenth meeting1 that the Conference of the Parties at its thirteenth meeting consider whether the technical guidelines on incineration on land (D10), on specially engineered landfill (D5) and on hazardous waste physico-chemical treatment (D9) and biological treatment (D8) should be updated; 3. Also takes note of the results of the online survey2 and the full report thereon, including the responses to the survey; 3 4. Decides that the technical guidelines on incineration on land (D10) and on specially engineered landfill (D5) should be updated; 5. Invites Parties to consider serving as lead countries in the updating of the technical guidelines referred to in paragraph 4 above and to inform the Secretariat of their willingness to do so by 31 August 2017; 6. Decides to establish a small intersessional working group, operating by electronic means, to undertake the updating referred to in paragraph 4 above; 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Environmental Practices and Alternative Technologies for Medical Waste Management
    EIGHTH INTERNATIONAL WASTE MANAGEMENT CONGRESS AND EXHIBITION Institute of Waste Management of Southern Africa-Botswana Chapter 25TH to 28TH June 2007 Kasane, Botswana Best Environmental Practices and Alternative Technologies for Medical Waste Management Jorge Emmanuel, PhD, Lead Technical Consultant, United Nations Development Programme GEF Project on Health-Care Waste; President, The Environmental & Engineering Research Group; Adjunct Professor of Chemical Engineering, University of the Philippines, Diliman Abstract The spread of bloodborne pathogens in health-care waste motivated the World Health Organization to issue a policy in 2004 calling for the development of national policies, guidances, and plans for health-care waste management. The policy paper, however, also recognizes the risks associated with incineration, which in developing countries can be problematic due to the lack of capacity for emission testing or regulatory enforcement. The Stockholm Convention highlights the problem and requires the use of best environmental practices and best available techniques. Examples of best environmental practices, including segregation, waste minimization, handling, storage, and transport, are presented. The paper describes non-incineration alternative technologies including autoclaving, advanced steam systems, microwave treatment, and alkaline hydrolysis. For developing countries where sharps waste is a public health threat, for example, the use of reusable sharps containers, central autoclaving, post-treatment shredding, and recycling does away with single-use sharps containers and eliminates the need for landfilling. A Global Environmental Facility project will demonstrate and promote best practices and technologies in eight countries in order to virtually eliminate environmental releases of dioxins and mercury from health care. It will be a valuable tool for raising awareness and disseminating information on environmentally sound health-care waste management.
    [Show full text]