The End of a Decade the Start of a New Political Era If We Do Our Work Well, It Is Ques­ Tions Such As These That Should Properly Occupy the 1990S

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The End of a Decade the Start of a New Political Era If We Do Our Work Well, It Is Ques­ Tions Such As These That Should Properly Occupy the 1990S The End of a Decade The Start of a New Political Era If we do our work well, it is ques­ tions such as these that should properly occupy the 1990s. EDITORIAL - by HAROLD MEYERSON DEMOCRATIC LEFT A New Decade, ANew Era Founding Editor Michael Harringt.on (1928-1989) Managing Editor s what -- to mix up Marx, Hegel, other nations. That is the crux of the A Sherri Levine and Twain -- does a gilded age repeat 80s ambivalence: Americans celebrate the market -- anxiously. Editorial Committee itself? Tinsel Time? The Age of Junk? Joanne Barkan Which is where, I think, the left Whatever the most appropriate sobri­ Neil McLaughlin should part company from our comrade quet, the 1980s, as a chronological and Mazine Phillipe maybe even political period, are shud­ Robert Heilbroner. It was more the Jan Rosenberg dering to a halt. The most relentlessly market as an economic arrangement DEMOCRATIC LEFT (ISSN 0164- materialistic decade in modern mem­ than capitalism as an ideology which 3207) is published six times a year at ory is over. triumphed in the 1980s. The decade be­ 15 Dutch St., Suite 500, New York, If a decade is known by its crimi­ gan, let us remember, with the market NY 10038. Second Class postage paid nals, it is clear that nothing but money undermining Keynesianism with a newly at New York, NY Subscription $8 regular; $15 institutional. Postmas­ matteredin the 1980s. It was a time de­ global economy of transnational corpo­ rations and electronic banking subvert­ ter; Send address changes to 15 Dutch void of great crimes of passion. Kill for Street, Suit.e 500, New York, ::-.,·y 10038. ing the moderately egalitarian postwar love? Where is the percentage? Spying, DEMOCRATIC LEFT is published social contracts throughout the West. It too, became entirely a matter of eco­ by the Democratic Socialists of Amer­ nomics, not belief: ideology motivated concluded with the leaders of fossilized ica, 15 Dutch Street, #500, New Ycrk. hardly anyone to break the law. (Well, Stalinism forced to abandon their rule NY 10038, (212) 962-0390. there was Jonathan Pollard and, come so that their nations might survive in Signed articles express the opinions to think of it, Ollie North and his boss - the newly reintegrated world ~momy. of the authors and not neoessanly - but that is another story). The crimes But this does not mean that capital­ those of the organization. of the decade were inside trading, mail ism is the ideal to which both East and fraud, income tax evasion. Indeed, in a West aspire, or even that capitalism is dim light, the decade's great crimes and the ideology best suited to advancing the decade's great success stories were the national interest in the new world European Unity and Democratic difficult to distinguish. economy. (The United States gets clob­ Socialism After the Cold War And in that, the 1980s were not en­ bered on a daily basis by Asian mercan­ by Bogdan Denitch.......... .......... 3 tirely the 1920s, not entirely the Gilded tilism on rates of growth, and by Euro­ Lafzlo Brusta: Hungaey through Age Redux. It was a more conflicted pean social democracy on every index of the Eyes of a Trade Unionists decade: the claims of economic neces­ human well-being). Capitalism has not an Interview by Sherri Le\':ine-4 sity and moral superiority which clung won a permanent victory by virtue of DSAers Score Election Victories the market's going global, no more than to the accumulation of wealth in those I by Harry Fleischman. .......... 7 earlier times were less compelling this it won a permanent victory by virtue of DSA Convention Report: time out. Our latter-day social Darwin­ the market's going national in the early by Nancy Kleniewski ..... ····-··-··8 ist, George Gilder, was not accorded the part of the century. It has altered the Women and Wages: Then and authority that Herbert Spencer once playing field; it has forced the mass left Now commanded. Michael Milkin has not to become as international as the econ­ by Alice Kessler-Harris ............ 15 reached quite the guru status of Henry omy. The European Community's so­ Grassroots Politics in Action: Ford (except, perhaps, in New Perspec­ cial charter is the opening ofa very long Long Island Progressive Coali­ tives Quart€rly). The new wealth is term counter-offensive. tion wealth without divine sanction or social At decade's end, theclaimsforcapi­ by Hugh Cleland ....................... 17 utility. It's great if you got it, but it talism are less those of morality and El Salvador Revisited seems to lack a larger purpose. utility, and more that it is somehow by Patrick Lacefield, Linnea In part, the difference is that Henry synonymous with democracy. The equa­ Capps, and Bill Spencer........... 19 Ford actually made things, that Her­ tion fails to explain why most Ameri- I bert Spencer apologized for industrial­ cans surrender their citizenship rights DEPARTMENTS ists. George Gilder has a tougher task; when they enter their workplace, or Editorial...................................... 2 he must apologize for de-industrialists. why this most capitalist of democracies DSAction ..................... .............. 11 The market in the 80s genemt.ed greater, has a political participation rate more On The Left. ...................... ....... 12 not less, inequality. It diminished suitable to an earlier epoch (the Paleo­ Classifieds .......... ............ ... .. ......23 America's stature relative to that of lithic). DEMOCRA Tl<" LEFT 2 JANUARY- FEBRUARY 1990 European Unity and Democratic Socialism After the Cold War by Bogdan benitch maintaining the party monopoly, but unions defending workers, a mixed with a human face, to a multiparty economy with a larger chunk in the (This article is adapted from a speech system, to a multiparty system plus an publicsector,andessentiallytheparty's given on November 10 to the conven­ anti-left offensive against "overadven­ heavy hand out of the economy. For tion oftlu! Democrati.c Socialists ofAmer­ turous" types. These reactionary ten­ others it means the idealized version of ica on the morning after the fall of the dencies are quite thinly buried under Margaret Thatcher and Reagan, because Berlin Wall.) the surface in much of Eastern Europe. of the notion that the enemy ofyour en­ This is the first problem we face: emy is necessarily your friend. The more when one lifts the hd off societies which hostile Reagan and Thatcher were to T he occurrences this year, culmi- have been dull, gray, and repressive for the ruling systems in Eastern Europe, nating with the dancing on the Berlin decades, what emerges is not the be­ the more rosy and popular they ap­ Wall, are probably the most important loved community, not a culture of coop­ peared. If there's one way to popularize set of political events in the lifetime of eration and democracy and tolerance. an idea in Eastern Europe, it was to anyone born since the Second World What emerges is all kinds of stuff that have the party attack it. War. I refer to the collapse of the rele- you would expect to emerge after years I sympathize with Gorbachev. He vance of the Cold War. You can see the of repression. Not the least of the his­ has done a historical good deed by be­ desperate scrambling to maintain items torical costs of the decades of dictator­ ginning this entire process. The diffi­ of unnecessary baggage that are be- ship in Eastern Europe is the massive culty is that they're talking about mov­ coming very difficult to justify. For right-wing populist phenomenon, which ing into a market economy with exactly example, what is the point of NATO if is evident in Russia, Poland, Hungary, the same incompetent party hacks as the Warsaw Pact does not exist? What and now in Yugoslavia. So the path to managers who have ruined their econ­ is the point of maintaining large con- democratization runs through excee­ omy. The notion that simply changing ventional U.S. forces in Germany if Ger- dingly difficult and troubled waters. the rules of the economic game can take many is about to go neutral in exchange The second question is around the place without a radical transformation for unity? issue of the market and what the mar- of the society and its political culture is Eastem Europe is a mora.93 of words ket means. Everybody is for the market illusory. The same thing that was wrong that really don't mean what they used in Eastern Europe, except a few dino­ with the command economies would be to mean. Everybody now is for plural- saurs. It's like pluralism; it means all wrong with market economies unless ism -- everybody under the age of sixty. sorts ofthings . To some people, it means they are accompanied by a pluralistic When you begin to probe what plural- somethingmoreorlesslikeSweden:an democracy. The most radical single ism means, it means everything from ~ advanced welfare state, powerful trade demand in Eastern Europe is for trade unions that act as trade unions. European unification is very im­ portant in this context of the waning of the Cold War. It means the beginning of a long divorce between Europe and the United States. You cannot have a major advance toward socialist politics in a Europe that remains allied with the United States. As the wall collapses, the boundaries of Europe are going to be­ come fluid. It is this that makes the games being played by what remains of the communist regimes dangerous. In Poland and Hungazy, for instance, they are saying: come and invest here. We will provide you with low wages, weak trade unions, And practically no Demonstration in Prague, Czcchoslavakia in December, 1989.
Recommended publications
  • The Party of European Socialists, European Greens and European Left Party Respond to the Crisis1
    All anti-neo-liberal now? The Party of European Socialists, European Greens and European Left Party respond to the crisis1 Luke March University of Edinburgh [email protected] Paper for PSA 2013 Draft version 1.0. Work very much in progress. Please do not quote without author’s permission. Why has the left failed to benefit from the post-2008 economic crisis? This is a common, but perhaps slightly unfair question. It is difficult to see any one political family as a unique beneficiary, and indeed the right’s apparent earlier ideological hegemony has become unstuck with the ‘austerity medicine’ having consistently failed to revive the European patient. Nevertheless, there is still something remarkable about socio-economic conditions that should be a ‘perfect storm’ for left-wing politics regularly failing to produce anything like a clear boon for the left. The February 2013 Italian elections are just the latest that may mark a ‘no- confidence’ vote in the Centre-Left (McDonnell and Bobba 2013). The social democratic Democratic Party (PD) and its more leftist ally, the post-communist Left Ecology Freedom threw away an apparently unassailable lead to squeak ahead of the right and Beppe Grillo’s Five-Star Movement. This paper aims to contribute to answering this overarching question by comparing the policy and ideological response to the crisis undertaken by the three ‘left’ transnational party federations (TNPs) at European level, the Party of European Socialists (PES), European Green Party (EGP) and European Left Party (EL).2 Comparing the three TNPs is an apposite approach. Although TNPs are ‘timidly rising actors’, relatively weak formations that fall far short of being fully integrated parties, they at the very least aspire to a minimal level of ideological and policy co-ordination (Bardi 2004; cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Remaking Italy? Place Configurations and Italian Electoral Politics Under the ‘Second Republic’
    Modern Italy Vol. 12, No. 1, February 2007, pp. 17–38 Remaking Italy? Place Configurations and Italian Electoral Politics under the ‘Second Republic’ John Agnew The Italian Second Republic was meant to have led to a bipolar polity with alternation in national government between conservative and progressive blocs. Such a system it has been claimed would undermine the geographical structure of electoral politics that contributed to party system immobilism in the past. However, in this article I argue that dynamic place configurations are central to how the ‘new’ Italian politics is being constructed. The dominant emphasis on either television or the emergence of ‘politics without territory’ has obscured the importance of this geographical restructuring. New dynamic place configurations are apparent particularly in the South which has emerged as a zone of competition between the main party coalitions and a nationally more fragmented geographical pattern of electoral outcomes. These patterns in turn reflect differential trends in support for party positions on governmental centralization and devolution, geographical patterns of local economic development, and the re-emergence of the North–South divide as a focus for ideological and policy differences between parties and social groups across Italy. Introduction One of the high hopes of the early 1990s in Italy was that following the cleansing of the corruption associated with the party regime of the Cold War period, Italy could become a ‘normal country’ in which bipolar politics of electoral competition between clearly defined coalitions formed before elections, rather than perpetual domination by the political centre, would lead to potential alternation of progressive and conservative forces in national political office and would check the systematic corruption of partitocrazia based on the jockeying for government offices (and associated powers) after elections (Gundle & Parker 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Dimensions and Alignments in European Union Politics: Cognitive Constraints and Partisan Responses
    Working Paper Series in European Studies Volume 1, Number 3 Dimensions and Alignments in European Union Politics: Cognitive Constraints and Partisan Responses DR. SIMON HIX DEPARTMENT OF GOVERNMENT LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS AND POLITICAL SCIENCE Houghton Street London, WC2A 2AE United Kingdom ([email protected]) EDITORIAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE: GILLES BOUSQUET KEITH COHEN COLLEEN DUNLAVY ANDREAS KAZAMIAS LEON LINDBERG ELAINE MARKS ANNE MINER ROBERT OSTERGREN MARK POLLACK GREGORY SHAFFER MARC SILBERMAN JONATHAN ZEITLIN Copyright © 1998 All rights reserved. No part of this paper may be reproduced in any form without permission of the author. European Studies Program, International Institute, University of Wisconsin--Madison Madison, Wisconsin http://polyglot.lss.wisc.edu/eur/ 1 Dimensions and Alignments in European Union Politics: Cognitive Constraints and Partisan Responses Simon Hix Department of Government, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom Abstract As the European Union (EU) has evolved, the study agenda has shifted from ‘European integration’ to ‘EU politics’. Missing from this new agenda, however, is an understanding of the ‘cognitive constraints’ on actors, and how actors respond: i.e. the shape of the EU ‘political space’ and the location of social groups and competition between actors within this space. The article develops a theoretical framework for understanding the shape of the EU political space (the interaction between an Integration-Independence and a Left-Right dimension and the location of class and sectoral groups within this map), and tests this framework on the policy positions of the Socialist, Christian Democrat and Liberal party leaders between 1976 and 1994 (using the techniques of the ECPR Party Manifestos Group Project).
    [Show full text]
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Full Issue (PDF)
    JULY/AUGUSTl 996 VOLUME XXV NUMBER 4 Sl . 50~.,o,_o_ - ... , DEMOCRATIC ,., , . ~ 6 AMA11.~ , ·X 523 1 06 1 PUBLISHED BY THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALISTS OF AMERICA -."" M 'Y . E D T 0 R A L DSA's Perspective on the 1996 Elections A STATEMENT FROM DSA's NATIONAL PouncAL COMMITTEE he key goal for progre.ssives an~ socialms in_t~e 1996 elec­ • supporting civil rights by defeating the California Civil T tions is to defeat the Republican right. To do thtS involv~ three Rights Initiative (which would actually take away key rights important usks: for people of color and women); • defeat Bob Dole; • advancing the principle of health care for all by support • retake Congre.ss from the Republicans; and for iniuatives on HMOs; and • enlarge and strengthen the Progressive Caucus in • strengthening the principle of a living wage for all by sup­ Congress. pon for the initiative rai~ing the minimum wage. To most of us on the le.ft the 1996 Presidential race offers little In addttion, the Progress Caucus has developed a •progressive in the way of hope for positive social and economic change. Polls today Prom1~e to America• which includes eleven agenda items from corporate suggest that President Clinton has a commanding lead. But it's far to early responsibility to a living wage to downsizing the military budget. In Wash­ to declare victory. And of course a Ointon victory would be a partial one ington, DSA has been working ~-ith the Caucus and the Committee on at best. Econoffilc Insecunty to develop public bearing~ on issues related w this Four years ago, Clinton won the Presidential election by fo­ agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • The Quality of Democracy: Improvement Or Subversion
    First unedited draft, Comments very welcome Italy and Spain by Rafael López-Pintor & Leonardo Morlino University of Madrid and University of Florence To be presented at the Conference on “The Quality of Democracy: Improvement or Subversion?”, Center on Democracy, Development, and the Rule of Law & European Forum, Stanford Institute for International Studies, Stanford, October 10-11, 2003. Why Italy and Spain? The democratic quality of every European polity is worthwhile to be analyzed. The fact that most of European democracies are well established is not related, if not indirectly, to the ‘quality’ they are able to achieve. Thus, during last years meaningful assessments of some European democracy have been carried out. For example, one of the most relevant democratic assessment is that of United Kingdom recently carried out by Beetham and Weir (1999). In this perspective the decision of analyzing Italy and Spain has no strong theoretical or empirical reasons except the willingness of choosing not the old, stable democracies, but more recently established, large democratic polity in countries with previous authoritarian experiences in their more or less recent past. That is, our interest was rather directed toward European democracies that may be more problematic with regard to quality because of their political traditions. At the same time, Italy and Spain can be usefully contrasted as the Italian democratic installation and consolidation go back to the 1940’s and 1950’s whereas the Spanish ones are more recent and take place during the second part of 1970’s and early 1980’s. Such a comparison allow us to consider within the ‘ceteris paribus’ clause the size of the country with all related aspects.
    [Show full text]
  • PROOF Contents
    PROOF Contents Acknowledgements viii 1 Survival and Renewal: The 1990s 1 2 Regroupment: Establishing a European Movement 29 3 The Party of the European Left 46 4 Diverse Trends: An Overview 66 5 A Successful Model? Die Linke (the Left Party – Germany) 83 6 How Have the Mighty Fallen: Partito della Rifondazione Comunista (Party of Communist Refoundation – Italy) 99 7 Back from the Brink: French Communism (Parti Communiste Français) Re-orientates 116 8 Communism Renewed and Supported: The Communist Party of Bohemia and Moravia (the Czech Republic) 132 9 The Scandinavian Left 147 10 The European Left and the Global Left: 1999–2009 163 Notes 192 Index 204 vii PROOF 1 Survival and Renewal: The 1990s Almost two decades after the fall of the Berlin Wall, on the occasion of the German federal elections in September 2009, the International Herald Tribune marked the electoral victory of the German right with the headline, ‘Is socialism dying?’1 The German Social Democratic Party or the Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands (SPD) took 23% of the votes – its lowest poll since the Second World War – just months after the European elections registered a poor performance from left- wing candidates across the European Union (EU). As the article went on to observe, ‘Even in the midst of one of the greatest challenges to capitalism in 75 years, involving a breakdown of the financial sys- tem because of “irrational exuberance”, greed and the weakness of regulatory systems, European socialists and their leftist cousins have not found a compelling response, let alone taken advantage of the failures of the right.’ There is no doubt that across Europe the failure of the social demo- cratic parties to present a ‘compelling response’ to the economic crisis has led to a wave of electoral setbacks.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenger Party List
    Appendix List of Challenger Parties Operationalization of Challenger Parties A party is considered a challenger party if in any given year it has not been a member of a central government after 1930. A party is considered a dominant party if in any given year it has been part of a central government after 1930. Only parties with ministers in cabinet are considered to be members of a central government. A party ceases to be a challenger party once it enters central government (in the election immediately preceding entry into office, it is classified as a challenger party). Participation in a national war/crisis cabinets and national unity governments (e.g., Communists in France’s provisional government) does not in itself qualify a party as a dominant party. A dominant party will continue to be considered a dominant party after merging with a challenger party, but a party will be considered a challenger party if it splits from a dominant party. Using this definition, the following parties were challenger parties in Western Europe in the period under investigation (1950–2017). The parties that became dominant parties during the period are indicated with an asterisk. Last election in dataset Country Party Party name (as abbreviation challenger party) Austria ALÖ Alternative List Austria 1983 DU The Independents—Lugner’s List 1999 FPÖ Freedom Party of Austria 1983 * Fritz The Citizens’ Forum Austria 2008 Grüne The Greens—The Green Alternative 2017 LiF Liberal Forum 2008 Martin Hans-Peter Martin’s List 2006 Nein No—Citizens’ Initiative against
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Feasible Socialism
    ENDORSEMENT n. the occarion of the first nmtingr of the gov­ at the time of the April 2000 meetings of the erning bodier of the International Monetary World Bank and the International Moneta11 Fund 0 Fund (IMF) and the World Bank in the 21 rt (IMF) 10 Washington, DC. DSA/YDS will par­ century, we callfor the immediate stupension of the poli­ ticipate in the Mobilizatton for Global Jusucc, a cies and practices that have ca1md widerpread pover!J week of educational events and nonviolent p:o­ and mfftring among the worlds peoples, and damage to tests in Washington, which aim to promote m ·c the global environment. IJ:7e hold these inrlit11tionr respon­ equitable and democratically operated glom rible, along with the IVorldTrade Organization (WfO), stitutions in this time of sharp incguahty. I..ar~ for an unjurt global economic rystem. transnational corporations have gotten together: We issue this call in the name of global jus­ It's time for the rest of us. DSA believes Uu" tice, in solidarity with the peoples of the Global this is the appropriate follow-up to the protes o: South struggling for survival and dignity in the that derailed the \VfO meetings in Seattle face of unjust economic policies. Only when the fall. coercive powers of international financial insti­ DSA 1s joined in this mobilizanon b m tutions are rescinded shall governments be ac­ other organizations, such as Jubilee 2 • r countable first and foremost to the will of their Years is Enough, Global Exchange., and Pu people for equitable economJc development. Citizens's Global Trade Watch.
    [Show full text]
  • Now Or Never
    PUBLISHED BY THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALISTS OF AMERICA September/October 1995 Volume XXIII Number 5 $1.50 Now or Never Labor Day 1995 Inside Democratic Left Editorial: Ron Dellurns on economic Ron Aronson: 3 insecurity and the rise of the right 2 5 Socialism Without Apologies Perestroika on Sixteenth Street: Daraka Larimore-Hall: 4 Harold Meyerson on the AFL-CIO 3O A Letter from Zagreb Joel Shufro on Republican attacks on workplace safety 10 38 DSAction Power Across Borders: 14 Ginny Coughlin on the past and 0n the Left future of international organizing 40 by Harry Fleischman Jos~ Zu~kerbe~g on independent 19 umons m Mexico 42 Dear Margie The Left Bookshelf: Jo-Ann Mort Present Progressive 24 reviews Lia Matera' s Designer Crimes 4 3 by Alan Charney cover photo· David Bacon/Impact Vuuab DE~10CRATIC LEFT Final Notice: National Director Alan Charney }vfo11agi11g Editor The 1995 DSA National tonvention David Glenn Editorial Committee November 10 - 12 •Washington, D.C. Joanne Barkan, Dorothee Benz, Everyone is welcome--but in order to make this year's Com·en­ Suzanne Crowell, Jeff Gold, Sherri Le\'ine, tion as inexpensive as possible, we've had to set an early deadline Steve Max, Maxine Phillips for registration. So ifyou're interested in attending, contact DSA f qzmding Editor Program Coordinator Michele Rossi immediatery at 2121727- Michael Harrington 8610 or [email protected]. (1928-1989) !P111DlTt1tlc Left (ISSNOl6400~07) is publish<'d If you'd like to submit resolutions to be considered at the bimonUlly at 180VarldcStsttt. New York. NY 10014. Sccond-da.M pcx'.age pid at :>:cw York.
    [Show full text]
  • Mansfield-1992.Pdf (12.56Mb)
    1992 ANNUAL REPORT MANSFIELD, MASSACHUSETTS TABLE OF CONTENTS In Memoriam ............................... 2 Retirements ............................... 3 Mansfield at a Glance 4 Town Officials ........ 5 Administrative Staff 5 6 t r Boards and Committees Membership ............................... ............................... ......... t J General Government Board of Selectmen .... ........ ........................ ..................... .................. 8 yTown Manager ......... ......... ..................... ...................... ......... ......... 9 r Public Safety Police . ...... ...... ...... ...... 10 Fire ........ ......... .................. ......... ........ ......... .................. ' 10 Emergency Management Agency ......... It Building Department 11 Public Works Office Operations 13 Engineering Department .. 13 Building Operations . .... .... .... .... ...... 13 Highway Department : 13 Motor Pool ...................................................................... ............................... 14 Water Division 14 Water Pollution Control Facility 14 Community Development i t Planning Department .................................... ............................... ................. 15 Planning Board .... ............................... ...................... .... ....... 15 SRPEDD.... .......... ............................... ............... .......................... 16 Conservation Commission ........................ .................... ........: ................ 17 rf Zoning Board of Appeals ..........................
    [Show full text]
  • High Speed Rail White Paper
    THE LIGHT AT THE END OF THE TUNNEL HIGH-SPEED RAIL IN ORANGE COUNTY AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WHITE PAPER THE LIGHT AT THE END OF THE TUNNEL HIGH-SPEED RAIL IN ORANGE COUNTY AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WHITE PAPER i. Preface 1 Introduction and Background 1.1 Background 1.2 Purpose of Conference 2 Conference Summary 2.1 Welcome and Opening Remarks 2.1.1 Sarah L. Catz, Director, Center for Urban Infrastructure 2.1.2 Gary Brahm, Chancellor of Brandman University 2.1.3 Curt Pringle, Mayor of Anaheim and Chair, California High-Speed Rail Authority 2.2 Global Positioning: High-Speed Rail Around the Globe 2.2.1 Tom Downs, Chair, Rail Division, Veolia Transportation 2.3 Benefits of High-Speed Rail 2.3.1 Sarah L. Catz, Director, Center for Urban Infrastructure 2.4 How Do We Pay For High-Speed Rail? Moderator, John Haussmann, VP and Principal Manager, HDR 2.4.1 Do Public-Private Partnerships Make Sense? Mike Schneider, Managing Partner, InfraConsult 2.4.2 Foreign Investors: Kent Carl, President, Triarm International, Inc. 2.5 Federal Strategy 2.5.1 Loretta Sanchez, U.S. Representative, 47th District 2.6 Getting Connected: Defining an Effective Intermodal Strategy 2.6.1 Peter Buffa, Member, Board of Directors, Orange County Transportation Authority 2.6.2 Richard Flierl, Principal, Cooper Carry 2.6.3 Emile Haddad, President and CEO, FivePoint Communities 2.6.4 Art Leahy, CEO, Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority 2.6.5 Will Kempton, CEO, Orange County Transportation Authority 2.6.6 Larry Agran, Mayor Pro Tem, City of Irvine 2.7 What are the Solutions 2.7.1 Tom Umberg, Vice Chair, California High-Speed Rail Authority 2.7.1.1 Participated Discussion 3 Online Survey 3.1 Survey Overview 3.2 Survey Data 4 Appendices 4.1 Speaker Bios 4.2 Proposed California High-Speed Rail Lines PREFACE4.3 Thinking Ahead: High-Speed Rail in Southern California, a report released in August by the Center for Urban Infrastructure, showcased the benefits of a fast, convenient, and efficient intercity high-speed rail system on southern California’s economy.
    [Show full text]