DOCSLIB.ORG

REPORT SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY Appendix

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
REPORT SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY Appendix GENERAL PLAN SAFETY TECHNICAL REPORT SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY Appendix San Bernardino Countywide Plan Safety Background Report REPORT USE, INTENT, AND LIMITATIONS This Background Report was prepared to inform the preparation of the Countywide Plan. This report is not intended to be continuously updated and may contain out-of-date material and information. This report reflects data collected in 2016 and early 2017 as part of due diligence and issue identification. This report is not intended to be comprehensive and does not address all issues that were or could have been considered and discussed during the preparation of the Countywide Plan. Additionally, many other materials (reports, data, etc.) were used in the preparation of the Countywide Plan. This report is not intended to be a compendium of all reference materials. This report may be used to understand some of the issues considered and discussed during the preparation of the Countywide Plan, but should not be used as the sole reference for data or as confirmation of intended or desired policy direction. Final policy direction was subject to change based on additional input from the general public, stakeholders, and decision makers during regional outreach meetings, public review of the environmental impact report, and public adoption hearings. Data and analysis as of November 2016 Updated with outreach summary in November 2018 Prepared by: PlaceWorks In CollaborationDRAFT with Dudek on Fire Hazards May 2016 PlaceWorks DRAFT COUNTYWIDE PLAN SAFETY BACKGROUND REPORT SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY Table of Contents Table of Contents 1. PUBLIC SAFETY CONTEXT ....................................................................................................................... 1-1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1-1 PURPOSE AND ORGANIZATION OF REPORT ................................................................ 1-2 SUMMARY OF PUBLIC OUTREACH ...................................................................................... 1-3 REPORT FINDINGS ...................................................................................................................... 1-5 1.4.1 Seismic and Geologic Hazards ......................................................................................... 1-5 1.4.2 Flood Hazards ..................................................................................................................... 1-6 1.4.3 Hazardous Materials ........................................................................................................... 1-7 1.4.4 Fire Hazards ......................................................................................................................... 1-8 1.4.5 Emergency Preparedness ................................................................................................... 1-9 ADDITIONAL ISSUES TO EXPLORE .................................................................................. 1-10 2. SEISMIC AND GEOLOGIC HAZARDS ........................................................................................................ 2-1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.1 Regulatory Setting ............................................................................................................... 2-2 2.1.2 Important Terms ................................................................................................................. 2-7 2.1.3 Geologic Setting ................................................................................................................ 2-10 2.1.4 Recent Geologic and Seismic Events ............................................................................ 2-11 SEISMIC AND GEOLOGIC HAZARDS ................................................................................ 2-13 2.2.1 Ground Shaking ................................................................................................................ 2-13 2.2.2 Later Quaternary Surface Fault Rupture ....................................................................... 2-14 2.2.3 Liquefaction ....................................................................................................................... 2-19 2.2.4 Landslides & Slope Instability ......................................................................................... 2-20 2.2.5 Corrosive Soils ................................................................................................................... 2-23 2.2.6 Settlement/Subsidence..................................................................................................... 2-24 2.2.7 Expansive and Collapsible Soil ....................................................................................... 2-27 2.2.8 Hazardous Minerals .......................................................................................................... 2-28 IMPLEMENTING AGENCIES ................................................................................................. 2-29 3. FLOODING HAZARDS ................................................................................................................................ 3-1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.1 Regulatory Setting ............................................................................................................... 3-2 3.1.2 Important Terms ................................................................................................................. 3-6 3.1.3 Recent Flooding Events ..................................................................................................... 3-9 3.1.4 Hydrologic Setting ............................................................................................................ 3-11 3.1.5 Assets At Risk From Flooding ....................................................................................... 3-12 FLOODING HAZARDS ............................................................................................................. 3-15 3.2.1 Dam Inundation ................................................................................................................ 3-15 3.2.2 Levee Inundation .............................................................................................................. 3-18 3.2.3 Riverine Flooding .............................................................................................................. 3-29 3.2.4 Urban Flooding ................................................................................................................. 3-33 3.2.5 Alluvial Fans ...................................................................................................................... 3-35 DRAFT3.2.6 Debris and Mud Flows ..................................................................................................... 3-36 Data and analysis as of November 2016, with outreach summary added November 2018 PlaceWorks | Page i COUNTYWIDE PLAN SAFETY BACKGROUND REPORT SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY Table of Contents IMPLEMENTING AGENCIES ................................................................................................. 3-39 4. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ......................................................................................................................... 4-1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1.1 Regulatory Setting ............................................................................................................... 4-2 4.1.2 Important Terms ................................................................................................................. 4-7 4.1.3 Recent Hazardous Materials Incidents ............................................................................ 4-9 POTENTIAL HAZARDS ............................................................................................................ 4-11 4.2.1 Toxic Chemical Releases .................................................................................................. 4-12 4.2.2 Superfund National Priority List .................................................................................... 4-13 4.2.3 Formerly Used Defense Sites .......................................................................................... 4-14 4.2.4 GroundWater Contamination ......................................................................................... 4-15 4.2.5 Radioactive Waste ............................................................................................................. 4-17 4.2.6 Hazardous Material Transport ........................................................................................ 4-18 4.2.7 Solid Waste Disposition ................................................................................................... 4-22 IMPLEMENTING AGENCIES ................................................................................................. 4-27 5. FIRE HAZARDS ........................................................................................................................................... 5-1 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Weld County 2011-2013 Annual Wildfire Operating Plan
    WELD COUNTY 2011-2013 ANNUAL WILDFIRE OPERATING PLAN Prepared by: Weld County Office of Emergency Management Weld County Fire Chiefs’ Association Colorado State Forest Service, Fort Collins District Pawnee National Grasslands, Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forests This agreement is to remain in effect until the next Annual Operating Plan is modified and signed TABLE OF CONTENTS I. ANNUAL WILDFIRE OPERATING PLAN APPROVALS ............................................. 3 II. JURISDICTIONS / MAP ..................................................................................................... 4 III. AUTHORITIES FOR THIS PLAN ..................................................................................... 4 IV. PURPOSE ............................................................................................................................ 4 V. FIRE MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITIES ................................................................... 4 VI. RESOURCE LIST ............................................................................................................... 4 VII. WILDFIRE READINESS .................................................................................................... 5 A. Planning ................................................................................................................................ 5 B. Training ................................................................................................................................. 5 C. Equipment ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wildfires from Space
    Wildfires from Space More Lessons from the Sky Satellite Educators Association http://SatEd.org This is an adaptation of an original lesson plan developed and published on-line by Natasha Stavros at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory. The original problem set and all of its related links is available from this address: https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/edu/teach/activity/fired-up-over-math-studying-wildfires-from-space/ Please see the Acknowledgements section for historical contributions to the development of this lesson plan. This spotlight on the “Wildfires from Space” lesson plan was published in November 2016 in More Lessons from the Sky, a regular feature of the SEA Newsletter, and archived in the SEA Lesson Plan Library. Both the Newsletter and the Library are freely available on-line from the Satellite Educators Association (SEA) at this address: http://SatEd.org. Content, Internet links, and materials on the lesson plan's online Resources page revised and updated in October 2019. SEA Lesson Plan Library Improvement Program Did you use this lesson plan with students? If so, please share your experience to help us improve the lesson plan for future use. Just click the Feedback link at http://SatEd.org/library/about.htm and complete the short form on-line. Thank you. Teaching Notes Wildfires from Space Invitation Wildfire is a global reality, and with the onset of climate change, the number of yearly wildfires is increasing. The impacts range from the immediate and tangible to the delayed and less obvious. In this activity, students assess wildfires using remote sensing imagery.
    [Show full text]
  • Department Emergency Operations Plan (DEOP)
    San Bernardino County PROBATION DEPARTMENT Department Emergency Operations Plan (DEOP) October 2020 San Bernardino County SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY Probation Department Emergency Operations Plan Department (DEOP) THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK San Bernardino County SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY Probation Department Emergency Operations Plan Department (DEOP) RECORD OF CHANGES On an annual basis, the County Departments/Agencies shall review their respective DEOP and/or update Department/Agency Functional Annexes as appropriate. Document the date of the review and the names of personnel conducting the review. Change Section Change Revised By Description of Change # Date 1 10/3/18 Carrie Cruz ICEMA response Part I - Basic 2 6/26/19 Carrie Cruz Added Sec. 4.2 – DEOP Implementation Language Plan, Sec. 4 Part I - Basic Added Sec. 4.2.1 – Decision Matrix for DEOP 3 6/26/19 Carrie Cruz Plan, Sec. 4 Implementation Part II – 4 6/27/19 Carrie Cruz Revised Sec. Title and Additional Language Annex 2 Part II – Added Sec. 2.1.1 – MEF Initial Screening Aid and 5 6/27/19 Carrie Cruz Annex 2 Language Part II – Added Standardized MEF Chart for all County 6 Annex 2, 6/27/19 Carrie Cruz Department/Agencies and Language Sec. 2.1.1 Table of 7 6/27/19 Carrie Cruz Updated TOC Contents Part II – 8 7/1/19 Carrie Cruz Added Planning Tips – Step 1 Annex 1 Part II – 9 7/1/19 Carrie Cruz Added Planning Tips – Step 2 Annex 2 Part II – 10 7/1/19 Carrie Cruz Added Planning Tips – Step 3 Annex 3 Part II – 11 7/1/19 Carrie Cruz Added Planning Tips – Step 4 Annex 4 Part II – 12 7/1/19 Carrie
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary
    Preliminary Mitigated Negative Declaration Date: January 9, 2019 Case No.: 2016-006868ENV Project Title: SFPUC Reliable Power Project Project Location: Portions of the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Rights of Way in Stanislaus, Mariposa, and Tuolumne Counties Zoning: Various Project Sponsor San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Antonia Sivyer (415) 554-2474 Lead Agency: San Francisco Planning Department Staff Contact: Timothy Johnston – (415) 575-9035 [email protected] PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) proposes to implement the Reliable Power Project (proposed project) for maintaining the reliability of the SFPUC’s electrical transmission system between the Holm and Kirkwood Powerhouses and the Warnerville Substation. The project includes implementation of a long-term vegetation management program that would address the North American Electric Reliability Corporation’s reliability standard (FAC-003) and other regulatory requirements that seek to minimize the risk of power outages and fires from vegetation contact with transmission lines on or near the right of way for electrical transmission lines1. In addition to implementation of the vegetation management program, the proposed project would include repairs and replacements for culverts associated with transmission line access roads and construction of a sand storage shed to stockpile sand for winter road treatments needed for access during winter months. Construction activities associated with the proposed project would occur within existing SFPUC facility and right of way boundaries in Stanislaus County, Mariposa County, and Tuolumne County, and would not require the acquisition of new property. Project implementation involving vegetation management would be ongoing. Construction activities and duration for culvert repair and/or replacement would vary along the transmission corridor, but would be short-term in nature, generally requiring a few of days to a couple of weeks to complete.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire and Nonnative Invasive Plants September 2008 Zouhar, Kristin; Smith, Jane Kapler; Sutherland, Steve; Brooks, Matthew L
    United States Department of Agriculture Wildland Fire in Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station Ecosystems General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-42- volume 6 Fire and Nonnative Invasive Plants September 2008 Zouhar, Kristin; Smith, Jane Kapler; Sutherland, Steve; Brooks, Matthew L. 2008. Wildland fire in ecosystems: fire and nonnative invasive plants. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-42-vol. 6. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 355 p. Abstract—This state-of-knowledge review of information on relationships between wildland fire and nonnative invasive plants can assist fire managers and other land managers concerned with prevention, detection, and eradi- cation or control of nonnative invasive plants. The 16 chapters in this volume synthesize ecological and botanical principles regarding relationships between wildland fire and nonnative invasive plants, identify the nonnative invasive species currently of greatest concern in major bioregions of the United States, and describe emerging fire-invasive issues in each bioregion and throughout the nation. This volume can help increase understanding of plant invasions and fire and can be used in fire management and ecosystem-based management planning. The volume’s first part summarizes fundamental concepts regarding fire effects on invasions by nonnative plants, effects of plant invasions on fuels and fire regimes, and use of fire to control plant invasions. The second part identifies the nonnative invasive species of greatest concern and synthesizes information on the three topics covered in part one for nonnative inva- sives in seven major bioregions of the United States: Northeast, Southeast, Central, Interior West, Southwest Coastal, Northwest Coastal (including Alaska), and Hawaiian Islands.
    [Show full text]
  • Station Fire BAER Revisit – May 10-14, 2010
    United States Department of Agriculture Station Fire Forest Service Pacific Southwest BAER Revisit Region September 2009 Angeles National Forest May 10-14, 2010 Big Tujunga Dam Overlook May 11, 2010 Acknowledgements I would like to express thanks to the following groups and individuals for their efforts for planning and holding the Revisit. Thanks to all the Resource Specialists who participated; Jody Noiron - Forest Supervisor; Angeles National Forest Leader- ship Team; Lisa Northrop - Forest Resource and Planning Officer; Marc Stamer - Station Fire Assessment Team Leader (San Bernardino NF); Kevin Cooper - Assistant Station Fire Assessment Team Leader (Los Padres NF); Todd Ellsworth - Revisit Facilitator (Inyo NF); Dr. Sue Cannon, US Geological Survey, Denver, CO; Jess Clark, Remote Sensing Application Center, Salt Lake City, UT; Pete Wohlgemuth, Pacific Southwest Research Station-Riverside, Penny Luehring, National BAER Coordinator, and Gary Chase (Shasta-Trinity NF) for final report formatting and editing. Brent Roath, R5, Regional Soil Scientist/BAER Coordinator June 14, 2010 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • In the QUEUE Before a Difficult Conversation, Take the Other
    Latinpost.com Murrieta Fire Department Weekly Newsletter www.MurrietaCA.gov/fire www.MurrietaCA.gov/fireplans Re-deployed from the Sand to the Fire Soberanes fire out near Big Sur INSIDE THIS ISSUE: Highlights 1 Career Development 1 In the Queue 1 Training 2 EMS 2 Equipment/Facilities 3 Safety/Health 3 Prevention 3 Hot Shots 4 The Riverside County Fire Chiefs Association Steele Steps Up 4 has worked closely with My Safe: California to Fleet 5 produce its first multi-agency public service The Numbers 5 announcement. This edition focuses on Hearst Castle: It looks like the accommodations wildfire-urban interface. Link: HERE at these wildland fires are improving! Ackerman, Cicconi, Brann, and Rexroad assigned to the Chimney Fire. More: HERE Live Updates of California wildfires courtesy of L.A. Now Los Angeles Times - HERE Day #1 - Murrieta Fire Citizen’s Fire Academy EXTRAS In the QUEUE Before a Difficult Conversation, Principles of Modern Fire Take the Other Person’s Perspective Attack: Aug 25 Harvard Business Review – Amy Gallo Aug 19 2016 Free Webinar: How Clean is When you need to talk through a difficult issue with a coworker, Clean? PPE. Aug 30 it’s tempting to just get it over with. But don’t start the HP Open Enrollment: Aug 24 conversation until you’ve taken the time to see the situation from their perspective. Try to get a sense of what your Council Goals: Aug 26 colleague might be thinking. They have a rationale for the way they’ve been behaving, so what might that reason be? Imagine you’re in their shoes.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan
    INTENTIONAL BLANK PAGE Table of Contents Section 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 San Bernardino County Unincorporated Area ................................................................ 2 San Bernardino County Fire Protection District ..................................................... 3 San Bernardino County Flood Control District ....................................................... 4 Special Districts Department ................................................................................. 6 1.2 Purpose of the Plan ...................................................................................................... 11 1.3 Authority ....................................................................................................................... 12 1.4 What’s New .................................................................................................................. 12 Updates to the Current Plan ............................................................................... 13 New Jurisdictional Annexes ................................................................................. 13 New Risk Assessment ......................................................................................... 14 Successful Wildfire Mitigation Implementation .................................................... 15 Flood Hazard Mitigation Success ........................................................................ 18 Geologic
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Southern California
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Southern California Climate and Vegetation Over the Past 125,000 Years from Lake Sequences in the San Bernardino Mountains A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Geography by Katherine Colby Glover 2016 © Copyright by Katherine Colby Glover 2016 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Southern California Climate and Vegetation Over the Past 125,000 Years from Lake Sequences in the San Bernardino Mountains by Katherine Colby Glover Doctor of Philosophy in Geography University of California, Los Angeles, 2016 Professor Glen Michael MacDonald, Chair Long sediment records from offshore and terrestrial basins in California show a history of vegetation and climatic change since the last interglacial (130,000 years BP). Vegetation sensitive to temperature and hydroclimatic change tended to be basin-specific, though the expansion of shrubs and herbs universally signalled arid conditions, and landscpe conversion to steppe. Multi-proxy analyses were conducted on two cores from the Big Bear Valley in the San Bernardino Mountains to reconstruct a 125,000-year history for alpine southern California, at the transition between mediterranean alpine forest and Mojave desert. Age control was based upon radiocarbon and luminescence dating. Loss-on-ignition, magnetic susceptibility, grain size, x-ray fluorescence, pollen, biogenic silica, and charcoal analyses showed that the paleoclimate of the San Bernardino Mountains was highly subject to globally pervasive forcing mechanisms that register in northern hemispheric oceans. Primary productivity in Baldwin Lake during most of its ii history showed a strong correlation to historic fluctuations in local summer solar radiation values.
    [Show full text]
  • Adapt to More Wildfire in Western North American Forests As Climate
    PERSPECTIVE PERSPECTIVE Adapt to more wildfire in western North American forestsasclimatechanges Tania Schoennagela,1, Jennifer K. Balcha,b, Hannah Brenkert-Smithc, Philip E. Dennisond, Brian J. Harveye, Meg A. Krawchukf, Nathan Mietkiewiczb, Penelope Morgang, Max A. Moritzh, Ray Raskeri, Monica G. Turnerj, and Cathy Whitlockk,l Edited by F. Stuart Chapin III, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, AK, and approved February 24, 2017 (received for review October 25, 2016) Wildfires across western North America have increased in number and size over the past three decades, and this trend will continue in response to further warming. As a consequence, the wildland–urban in- terface is projected to experience substantially higher risk of climate-driven fires in the coming decades. Although many plants, animals, and ecosystem services benefit from fire, it is unknown how ecosystems will respond to increased burning and warming. Policy and management have focused primarily on spec- ified resilience approaches aimed at resistance to wildfire and restoration of areas burned by wildfire through fire suppression and fuels management. These strategies are inadequate to address a new era of western wildfires. In contrast, policies that promote adaptive resilience to wildfire, by which people and ecosystems adjust and reorganize in response to changing fire regimes to reduce future vulnerability, are needed. Key aspects of an adaptive resilience approach are (i) recognizing that fuels reduction cannot alter regional wildfire trends; (ii) targeting fuels reduction to increase adaptation by some ecosystems and residential communities to more frequent fire; (iii) actively managing more wild and prescribed fires with a range of severities; and (iv) incentivizing and planning residential development to withstand inevitable wildfire.
    [Show full text]
  • Synthesis of Knowledge of Extreme Fire Behavior: Volume I for Fire Managers
    United States Department of Agriculture Synthesis of Knowledge of Forest Service Pacific Northwest Extreme Fire Behavior: Research Station General Technical Volume I for Fire Managers Report PNW-GTR-854 November 2011 Paul A. Werth, Brian E. Potter, Craig B. Clements, Mark A. Finney, Scott L. Goodrick, Martin E. Alexander, Miguel G. Cruz, Jason A. Forthofer, and Sara S. McAllister A SUMMARY OF KNOWLEDGE FROM THE The Forest Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture is dedicated to the principle of multiple use management of the Nation’s forest resources for sustained yields of wood, water, forage, wildlife, and recreation. Through forestry research, cooperation with the States and private forest owners, and management of the national forests and national grasslands, it strives—as directed by Congress—to provide increasingly greater service to a growing Nation. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD).
    [Show full text]
  • News Headlines 11/9/2016
    ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ News Headlines 11/9/2016 Measure A: Town voters say yes to fire tax - overwhelmingly Family of 6 displaced in San Bernardino apartment fire Firefighters Rescue Man Pinned Under SUV These 13 states have the most homes at risk from wildfires 2016 Wildfire Season Not Likely to Top Record-Setting 2015 Season 1 Measure A: Town voters say yes to fire tax - overwhelmingly Matthew Cabe, Daily Press Posted: November 8, 2016, 12:01 AM APPLE VALLEY — Voters are saying yes to the tax measure designed to bolster emergency services in the town, according to unofficial election results posted at 10 p.m. Tuesday. With more than 34 percent of precincts reporting, Measure A has received overwhelming approval, amassing 10,364 votes, which translates to 77 percent of the vote, according to the San Bernardino County Elections Office. Measure A needed a two-thirds majority to pass. Doug Qualls — former Apple Valley Fire Protection District Chief and Measure A’s principal officer — told the Daily Press things are “going well” in the district as a result of the voting. “The threshold of reaching two-thirds of the voters is an extraordinary effort,” Qualls said. “To get two-thirds of the people to agree on something, and we far exceeded that expectation, that’s by commitment to the community.” Qualls called Tuesday’s outcome the result of a reality wherein fire stations need to be reopened; currently just three of the district’s seven fire stations are opened, and emergency-response times are below the national averages. “In 1997,” Qualls said, “the fire district promised the voters that they would deliver the best service they can deliver with the resources provided.
    [Show full text]