DOCSLIB.ORG

I-10 Pavement Rehabilitation Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
I-10 Pavement Rehabilitation Project I-10 Pavement Rehabilitation Project RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA DISTRICT 8 – RIV – 10 (PM R104.9/R134.0) 1C082/0816000087 Draft Initial Study with Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration/ Environmental Assessment Prepared by the State of California, Department of Transportation The environmental review, consultation, and any other actions required by applicable Federal environmental laws for this project are being, or have been, carried out by Caltrans pursuant to 23 USC 327 and the Memorandum of Understanding dated December 23, 2016 and executed by FHWA and Caltrans. May 2019 Left Blank Intentionally General Information about This Document What’s in this document: The California Department of Transportation (Department), as assigned by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), has prepared this Initial Study/Environmental Assessment (IS/EA), which examines the potential environmental impacts of the alternatives being considered for the proposed project located in Riverside County, California. The Department is the lead agency under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The Department is the lead agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The document tells you why the project is being proposed, what alternatives we have considered for the project, how the existing environment could be affected by the project, the potential impacts of each of the alternatives, and the proposed avoidance, minimization, and/or mitigation measures. What you should do: • Please read this document. • Additional copies of this document and related technical studies are available for review at: Department of Transportation, Caltrans District 8 12th Floor 464 W. 4th Street San Bernardino, CA 92401 • This document may be downloaded at the following website: www.dot.ca.gov/d8/ • We’d like to hear what you think. If you have any comments about the proposed project, please call (909) 806-2541, or send your written comments to Caltrans by the deadline. • Send comments via postal mail to: Antonia Toledo, Environmental Branch Chief Department of Transportation Caltrans District 8 Environmental Planning (MS 820) 464 W. 4th Street, San Bernardino, CA 92401 • Send comments via email to: [email protected] • Be sure to send comments by the deadline: June 24, 2019 What happens next: After comments are received from the public and reviewing agencies, Caltrans may: (1) give environmental approval to the proposed project, (2) do additional environmental studies, or (3) abandon the project. If the project is given environmental approval and funding is obtained, Caltrans could design and construct all or part of the project. Alternative Formats: For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document can be made available in Braille, in large print, on audiocassette, or on computer disk. To obtain a copy in one of these alternate formats, please call or write Caltrans, Attn: Terri Kasinga, Chief, Public Affairs, 464 West 4th Street, San Bernardino, CA 92401; (909) 383-4646 (Voice), or use the California Relay Service 1 (800) 735- 2929 (TTY), 1 (800) 735-2929 (Voice) or 711. This page intentionally left blank SCH:____________ Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration Pursuant to: Division 13, Public Resources Code Project Description The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) proposes to rehabilitate the existing asphalt concrete (AC) pavement on Interstate 10 (I-10) from West of the SR-177/I-10 Separation, at Post Mile (PM) R104.9, to 1.05 miles west of the Wiley’s Well Road Overcrossing (PM R134.0) in the County of Riverside. Rehabilitation activities include removal and replacement of existing inside and outside shoulders, guardrails, rumble strips, drainage inlets, and dikes, and installation of oversized drains. The proposed project will also involve upgrades to ramp facilities for ADA compliance, installation of two temporary detour lanes in the existing median, extension of existing rock slope protection (RSP) at 44 bridge locations, and hydroseeding the median for erosion control and vegetation restoration. Determination This proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) is included to give notice to interested agencies and the public that it is Caltrans’ intent to adopt a MND for this project. This does not mean that Caltrans’ decision regarding the project is final. This MND is subject to change based on comments received by interested agencies and the public. Caltrans has prepared an Initial Study for this project, and pending public review, expects to determine that the proposed project would not have a significant effect on the environment for the following reasons: The proposed project would have no impact on aesthetics, agricultural and forest resources, air quality, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, land use and planning, mineral resources, noise, population and housing, public services, recreation, transportation/traffic, tribal cultural resources, or utilities and service systems. The proposed project would have less than significant impact on cultural resources, and hydrology and water quality. The proposed project would have less than significant impacts with mitigation on biological resources. To avoid and/or minimize potential impacts to biological resources, the following measures will be implemented. WQ-1: Construction General Permit. Prior to commencement of construction activities, the contractor shall obtain coverage under the State Water Resources Control Board’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction and Land Disturbance Activities (Construction General Permit), Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ, as amended by 2010- 0014-DWG and 2012-0006-DWQ, NPDES No. CAS000002, or any other subsequent permit. This shall include submission of Permit Registration Documents (PRDs), including Notice of Intent (NOI) for coverage under the permit to the State Water Resources Control Board via the Stormwater Multiple Application and Report Tracking System (SMARTS). Construction activities shall not commence until a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID) is obtained from SMARTS. A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be prepared and implemented to address all construction-related activities, equipment, and materials that have the potential to impact water quality. WQ-2: Caltrans MS4 Permit. The contractor shall comply with the provisions of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit, Statewide Storm Water Permit, Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) for the State of California, Department of Transportation Order No. 2012-0011-DWQ (Caltrans MS4 Permit), as amended by Order No. 2014-0006-EXEC, Order No. 2014-0077-DWQ, and Order No. 2015-0036-EXEC, NPDES No. CAS000003, or any subsequent permit. Caltrans- approved Design Pollution Prevention BMPs and Treatment BMPs shall be implemented to the maximum extent practicable (MEP), consistent with the requirements of the Caltrans MS4Permit. BIO-1: Biological Monitor. An authorized contractor supplied biologist will be designated to oversee compliance of all protective measures and will monitor all construction-related activities. The biological monitor will notify the resident engineer of project activities that may not be in compliance. The resident engineer will stop work until the protective measures are implemented fully. BIO-2: Worker Environmental Awareness Training. A qualified biologist will present to each employee (including temporary, contractors, and subcontractors) a worker environmental awareness training, prior to the initiation of work. They will be advised of the special status species in the project area, the steps to avoid impacts to the species and the potential penalties for taking such species. At a minimum, the program will include the following topics: occurrence of the listed and sensitive species in the area, their general ecology, sensitivity of the species to human activities, legal protection afforded these species, penalties for violations of Federal and State laws, reporting requirements, and project features designed to reduce the impacts to these species and promote continued successful occupation of the project area environs. Included in this program will be color photos of the listed species, which will be shown to the employees. Following the education program, the photos will be posted in the contractor and resident engineer office, where they will remain through the duration of the project. The contractor, resident engineer, and the qualified biologist will be responsible for ensuring that employees are aware of the listed species. If additional employees are added to the project after initiation, they will receive instruction prior to working on the project. BIO-3: Materials and Spoils. Project materials will not be cast from the project site into nearby habitats and project related debris, spoils, and trash will be contained and removed to a proper disposal facility. BIO-4: Equipment Staging. Equipment, vehicles, and materials staged and stored in Caltrans right-of-way will be sited in previously paved or previously disturbed areas only and will avoid native vegetation. BIO-5: De-Watering Plan. For all bridges that cross jurisdictional drainages and are susceptible to running water, a de-watering/water control plan must be created and implemented in accordance with Caltrans Water Control Standard Specifications (Standard Specification 13-4.03G) if water is present or could be present
Load more

Recommended publications
  • United States Air Force and Its Antecedents Published and Printed Unit Histories
    UNITED STATES AIR FORCE AND ITS ANTECEDENTS PUBLISHED AND PRINTED UNIT HISTORIES A BIBLIOGRAPHY EXPANDED & REVISED EDITION compiled by James T. Controvich January 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTERS User's Guide................................................................................................................................1 I. Named Commands .......................................................................................................................4 II. Numbered Air Forces ................................................................................................................ 20 III. Numbered Commands .............................................................................................................. 41 IV. Air Divisions ............................................................................................................................. 45 V. Wings ........................................................................................................................................ 49 VI. Groups ..................................................................................................................................... 69 VII. Squadrons..............................................................................................................................122 VIII. Aviation Engineers................................................................................................................ 179 IX. Womens Army Corps............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Countywide Airspace Usage
    A PPENDIX I Countywide Airspace Usage Riverside County is within one of the busiest and most complex sections of airspace in the United States, handling over 4.3 million operations annually. To better understand the magnitude of these op- erations and complexities of this system, Map 1 depicts Instrument Flight Rule (IFR) operations for the six busiest airports in the area for a 24-hour period on January 26, 1996. This exhibit does not depict operations from the 14 airports in Riverside County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan update. AIRSPACE STRUCTURE Since the advent of aviation, nations have established procedures within their boundaries to regulate the use of airspace. Airspace is broadly classified as either “controlled” or “uncontrolled” in the United States. The difference between the two categories relates primarily to requirements for pilot qualifica- tions, ground-to-air communications, navigation and traffic services, and weather conditions. Six classes of airspace have been designated in the United States. Airspace designated as Class A, B, C, D, or E is considered controlled airspace. Aircraft operating within controlled airspace are subject to vary- ing requirements for positive air traffic control. The airspace in Riverside County, as illustrated on Map 2, is constantly occupied by aircraft arriving and departing from other airports in the region. Frequently, overflights experienced in communities near Riverside County airports are not the result of operations at nearby airports, but from aircraft us- ing airports outside Riverside County. After the preparation of this plan, additional approaches have been established for aircraft arriving at Los Angeles International Airport. These new approaches were not included as part of the map development process for this plan.
    [Show full text]
  • 9/11 Report”), July 2, 2004, Pp
    Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page i THE 9/11 COMMISSION REPORT Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page v CONTENTS List of Illustrations and Tables ix Member List xi Staff List xiii–xiv Preface xv 1. “WE HAVE SOME PLANES” 1 1.1 Inside the Four Flights 1 1.2 Improvising a Homeland Defense 14 1.3 National Crisis Management 35 2. THE FOUNDATION OF THE NEW TERRORISM 47 2.1 A Declaration of War 47 2.2 Bin Ladin’s Appeal in the Islamic World 48 2.3 The Rise of Bin Ladin and al Qaeda (1988–1992) 55 2.4 Building an Organization, Declaring War on the United States (1992–1996) 59 2.5 Al Qaeda’s Renewal in Afghanistan (1996–1998) 63 3. COUNTERTERRORISM EVOLVES 71 3.1 From the Old Terrorism to the New: The First World Trade Center Bombing 71 3.2 Adaptation—and Nonadaptation— ...in the Law Enforcement Community 73 3.3 . and in the Federal Aviation Administration 82 3.4 . and in the Intelligence Community 86 v Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page vi 3.5 . and in the State Department and the Defense Department 93 3.6 . and in the White House 98 3.7 . and in the Congress 102 4. RESPONSES TO AL QAEDA’S INITIAL ASSAULTS 108 4.1 Before the Bombings in Kenya and Tanzania 108 4.2 Crisis:August 1998 115 4.3 Diplomacy 121 4.4 Covert Action 126 4.5 Searching for Fresh Options 134 5.
    [Show full text]
  • ROCKY MOUNTAIN BEEPLANT Peritoma (Cleome) Serrulata (Pursh) De Candolle Cleomaceae – Spiderflower Family Nancy L
    ROCKY MOUNTAIN BEEPLANT Peritoma (Cleome) serrulata (Pursh) de Candolle Cleomaceae – Spiderflower family Nancy L. Shaw and Corey L. Gucker | 2020 ORGANIZATION NOMENCLATURE Names, subtaxa, chromosome number(s), hybridization. Rocky Mountain beeplant (Peritoma serrulata [Pursh] de Candolle) is a member of the Cleomaceae or spiderflower family (Vanderpool and Iltis 2010) but was formerly placed in Range, habitat, plant associations, elevation, soils. family Capparaceae. The earliest specimen was collected in 1804 by Meriwether Lewis along the Missouri River near Vermillion in Clay County, South Dakota (Reveal et al. 1999). Recent Life form, morphology, distinguishing characteristics, reproduction. molecular work leaves the taxonomic placement of the family, genus, and species in question (see Hall 2008; Iltis et al. 2011; Roalson et al. 2015). Growth rate, successional status, disturbance ecology, importance to NRCS Plant Code. PESE7, CLSE (USDA NRCS animals/people. 2020). Subtaxa. No subspecies or varieties are Current or potential uses in restoration. recognized by the Flora of North America (Vanderpool and Iltis 2010). Welsh et al. (2015), using the synonym Cleome serrulata, recognized two intergrading phases in Utah: C. s. (Pursh) Seed sourcing, wildland seed collection, seed cleaning, storage, var. serrulata, which is widespread and C. s. var. testing and marketing standards. angusta (M. E. Jones) Tidestrom, which occurs only in Utah’s southern counties. Recommendations/guidelines for producing seed. Synonyms. Cleome serrulata Pursh, C. serrulata subsp. angusta (M. E. Jones), Peritoma inornata (Greene) Greene, P. serrulata var. albiflora Cockerell, P. serrulata var. clavata Lunell Recommendations/guidelines for producing planting stock. (Vanderpool and Iltis 2010). Common Names. Rocky Mountain beeplant, a’ pilalu (Zuni name), bee spiderflower, guaco, Navajo Recommendations/guidelines, wildland restoration successes/ spinach, pink cleome, pink bee plant, skunk weed, failures.
    [Show full text]
  • Eagle Mountain Pumped Storage Project Draft License Application Exhibit E, Volume 1, Public Information Palm Desert, California
    Eagle Mountain Pumped Storage Project Draft License Application Exhibit E, Volume 1, Public Information Palm Desert, California Submitted to: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Submitted by: Eagle Crest Energy Company Date: June 16, 2008 Project No. 080470 ©2008 Eagle Crest Energy DRAFT LICENSE APPLICATION- EXHIBIT E Table of Contents 1 General Description 1-1 1.1 Project Description 1-1 1.2 Project Area 1-2 1.2.1 Existing Land Use 1-4 1.3 Compatibility with Landfill Project 1-5 1.3.1 Land Exchange 1-5 1.3.2 Landfill Operations 1-6 1.3.3 Landfill Permitting 1-6 1.3.4 Compatibility of Specific Features 1-7 1.3.4.1 Potential Seepage Issues 1-8 1.3.4.2 Ancillary Facilities Interferences 1-9 2 Water Use and Quality 2-1 2.1 Surface Waters 2-1 2.1.1 Instream Flow Uses of Streams 2-1 2.1.2 Water quality of surface water 2-1 2.1.3 Existing lakes and reservoirs 2-1 2.1.4 Impacts of Construction and Operation 2-1 2.1.5 Measures recommended by Federal and state agencies to protect surface water 2-1 2.2 Description of Existing Groundwater 2-1 2.2.1 Springs and Wells 2-3 2.2.2 Water Bearing Formations 2-3 2.2.3 Hydraulic Characteristics 2-4 2.2.4 Groundwater Levels 2-5 2.2.5 Groundwater Flow Direction 2-6 2.2.6 Groundwater Storage 2-7 2.2.7 Groundwater Pumping 2-7 2.2.8 Recharge Sources 2-8 2.2.9 Outflow 2-9 2.2.10 Perennial Yield 2-9 2.3 Potential Impacts to Groundwater Supply 2-9 2.3.1 Proposed Project Water Supply 2-9 2.3.2 Perennial Yield 2-10 2.3.3 Regional Groundwater Level Effects 2-12 2.3.4 Local Groundwater Level Effects 2-15 2.3.5 Groundwater
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resources
    Draft DRECP and EIR/EIS CHAPTER III.8. CULTURAL RESOURCES III.8 CULTURAL RESOURCES This chapter presents the environmental setting/affected environment for the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan (DRECP) for cultural resources. More than 32,000 cultural resources are known in the Plan Area and occur in every existing environmental context, from mountain crests to dry lake beds, and include both surface and sub-surface deposits. Cultural resources are categorized as buildings, sites, structures, objects, and districts under both federal law (for the purposes of the National Environmental Policy Act [NEPA] and the National Historic Preservation Act [NHPA]) and under California state law (for the purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act [CEQA]). Historic properties are cultural resources included in, or eligible for inclusion in, the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) maintained by the Secretary of the Interior and per the NRHP eligibility criteria (36 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] 60.4). See Section III.8.1.1 for more information on federal regulations and historic properties. Historical resources are cultural resources that meet the criteria for listing on the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) (14 California Code of Regulations [CCR] Section 4850) or that meet other criteria specified in CEQA (see Section III.8.1.2). See Section III.8.1.2 for more information on state regulations and historical resources. This chapter discusses three types of cultural resources classified by their origins: prehistoric, ethnographic, and historic. Prehistoric cultural resources are associated with the human occupation and use of Cali- fornia prior to prolonged European contact.
    [Show full text]
  • Genesis Solar Energy Project PA/FEIS 1 August 2010 Relationship to the Genesis Solar Energy Project Staff Assessment and DEIS
    Bureau of Land Management PLAN AMENDMENT/FINAL EIS FOR THE GENESIS SOLAR ENERGY PROJECT Volume 1 of 3 August 2010 DOI Control #: FES 10-42 Publication Index #: BLM/CA/ES-2010-016+1793 NEPA Tracking # DOI-BLM-CA-060-0010-0015-EIS ,,..--...... United States Department ofthe Interior _.... _--­­ Bureau ofLand Management 1201 Bird Center Drive Palm Springs, CA 92262 Phone (760) 833·7100 IFax (760) 833-7199 http://www.blm.gov/calpalmsprings/ In reply refer to: CACA 048880 August 27, 20 I0 Dear Reader: Enclosed is the Proposed Resource Management Plan-Amendment/Final Environmental Impact Statement (PAIFEIS) for the California Desert Conservation Area (COCA) Plan and Genesis Solar Energy Project (GSEP). The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) prepared the PAiFEIS in consultation with cooperating agencies, taking into account public comments received during the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process. The proposed decision on the plan amendment would add the GSEP site to those identified in the current COCA Plan, as amended, for solar energy production. The preferred alternative on the GSEP is to approve the dry cooling alternative to the right-of-way grant applied for by Genesis Solar, LLC. This PAIFEIS for the GSEP has been developed in accordance with NEPA and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976. The PA is largely based on the preferred alternative in the Draft Resource Management Plan·AmendmentlDraft Environmentallmpact Statement (DRMP-AiDEIS), which was released on April 9, 2010. The PAIFEIS for the GSEP contains the proposed plan and project description, a summary of changes made between the DRMP·AlDEIS and PRMP-AiFEIS, an analysis of the impacts of the decisions, a summary ofwritten comments received during the public review period for the DRMP­ AlDEIS and responses to comments.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Vegetation Communities of San Diego County
    DRAFT VEGETATION COMMUNITIES OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY Based on “Preliminary Descriptions of the Terrestrial Natural Communities of California” prepared by Robert F. Holland, Ph.D. for State of California, The Resources Agency, Department of Fish and Game (October 1986) Codes revised by Thomas Oberbauer (February 1996) Revised and expanded by Meghan Kelly (August 2006) Further revised and reorganized by Jeremy Buegge (March 2008) March 2008 Suggested citation: Oberbauer, Thomas, Meghan Kelly, and Jeremy Buegge. March 2008. Draft Vegetation Communities of San Diego County. Based on “Preliminary Descriptions of the Terrestrial Natural Communities of California”, Robert F. Holland, Ph.D., October 1986. March 2008 Draft Vegetation Communities of San Diego County Introduction San Diego’s vegetation communities owe their diversity to the wide range of soil and climatic conditions found in the County. The County encompasses desert, mountainous and coastal conditions over a wide range of elevation, precipitation and temperature changes. These conditions provide niches for endemic species and a wide range of vegetation communities. San Diego County is home to over 200 plant and animal species that are federally listed as rare, endangered, or threatened. The preservation of this diversity of species and habitats is important for the health of ecosystem functions, and their economic and intrinsic values. In order to effectively classify the wide variety of vegetation communities found here, the framework developed by Robert Holland in 1986 has been added to and customized for San Diego County. To supplement the original Holland Code, additions were made by Thomas Oberbauer in 1996 to account for unique habitats found in San Diego and to account for artificial habitat features (i.e., 10,000 series).
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Genbank
    Org Divers Evol (2013) 13:485–496 DOI 10.1007/s13127-013-0136-4 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Molecular evidence for the origin and evolutionary history of the rare American desert monotypic family Setchellanthaceae Tania Hernández-Hernández & Wendy B. Colorado & Victoria Sosa Received: 28 November 2012 /Accepted: 4 April 2013 /Published online: 21 April 2013 # Gesellschaft für Biologische Systematik 2013 Abstract Setchellanthus caeruleus, which has disjunct Keywords Brassicales . Glucosinolates . Chihuahuan populations in the north of the Chihuahuan Desert and in Desert . Refugia . Tehuacán-Cuicatlán Valley the Tehuacán-Cuicatlán valley, was selected to understand the evolutionary history of plants in this desert and its southerly relicts. This species constitutes the monotypic Introduction family Setchellanthaceae, which forms part of a group of plants that produce mustard-oil glucosides or glucosinolates. The Chihuahuan Desert, a large upland arid area on the Molecular phylogenetic analyses based on DNA plastid Mexican Plateau, is the most biologically diverse desert in sequences of plants of S. caeruleus from both areas, includ- North America (Jaeger 1957). This arid land is limited in the ing representative taxa of the order Brassicales, were carried east by the Sierra Madre Oriental, in the west by the Sierra out to estimate the time of origin of the family (based on Madre Occidental, and in the north by the Arizona-New matK+rcbL) and divergence of populations (based on psbI- Mexico Mountains including western Texas (Fig. 1). A K, trnh-psbA, trnL-trnF). In addition, comparative ecological number of definitions and boundaries of the Chihuahuan niche modelling was performed to detect if climate variables Desert have been proposed based upon climate and vegeta- vary significantly in northern and southern populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Walter Fertig of the Caper Family That Superficially Resembles the Common Yellow Beeplant
    Manzanita Newsletter of The Kane County chapter of the Utah Native Plant Society February 2006 News Upcoming Events February Monthly Meeting: Monday, February 6: Seed Exchange. Come prepared to learn some seed basics, from what seeds are (and do), to how to grow them and how to find a seed buddy to share seed orders and catalogs. I will resurrect Botany 101 to briefly describe the biology Above: Hey buddy, want some Penstemon seeds? I and function of seeds. Jan Gisler will follow with a have seed available from Smooth Penstemon discussion of the volunteer work she and others have (Penstemon laevis), shown above, for anyone done at the Zion NP greenhouse coaxing native plant interested. Smooth penstemon is the tall, purplish- seeds to germinate. The meeting will conclude with blue penstemon with thick, deep green leathery the sharing of seeds and catalogs. I have some Two- leaves found scattered through The Sand Hills and needle pinyon, Utah juniper, Fourwing saltbush, and Coral Pink Sand Dunes northwest of Kanab. It is Smooth penstemon (Penstemon laevis) seed available found primarily on deep, sandy soils derived from to good homes. Come prepared with your own seed Navajo Sandstone and can grow up to 3 ½ feet tall. to swap and catalogs and order forms to collaborate Smooth penstemon has a relatively small geographic with others in making bulk orders. As always, range, occurring only in southeast Utah (Kane, desserts and hot drinks will be in abundance for Garfield, and Washington counties) and adjacent amiable botanical socialization. The meeting will areas of the Arizona Strip.
    [Show full text]
  • Eagle Mountain Pumped Storage Project No. 13123 Final License Application Technical Appendices for Exhibit E, Applicant Prepared Environmental Impact Statement
    PUBLIC Eagle Mountain Pumped Storage Project No. 13123 Final License Application Technical Appendices for Exhibit E, Applicant Prepared Environmental Impact Statement. Volume 3 of 6 Palm Desert, California Submitted to: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Submitted by: Eagle Crest Energy Company Date: June 22, 2009 GEI Project No. 080473 ©2009 Eagle Crest Energy Company 12 Appendix C – Technical Memoranda 12.9 Class I Cultural Resources Investigation for the Proposed Eagle Mountain Pumped Storage Project. A CLASS I CULTURAL RESOURCES INVESTIGATION for the PROPOSED EAGLE MOUNTAIN PUMPED STORAGE PROJECT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: Eagle Crest Energy Company 1 El Paseo West Building, Suite 204 74199 El Paseo Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Prepared by: Jerry Schaefer ASM Affiliates, Inc. 2034 Corte del Nogal Carlsbad, California 92011 PN 14011 Keywords: USGS 7.5-minute Corn Springs, Desert Center, East of Victory Pass, and Victory Pass quads; Chuckwalla Valley, Eagle Mountain Mine, Riverside County; Desert Training Center, Camp Desert Center, World War II, Historic Trash Scatters; Class III Field Inventory. April 2009 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page MANAGEMENT SUMMARY .................................................................iii 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION..............................................................1 2. ENVIRONMENTAL AND CULTURAL CONTEXT .............................5 NATURAL SETTING .............................................................................. 5 Geomorphology and Geology
    [Show full text]
  • FERNS and FERN ALLIES Dittmer, H.J., E.F
    FERNS AND FERN ALLIES Dittmer, H.J., E.F. Castetter, & O.M. Clark. 1954. The ferns and fern allies of New Mexico. Univ. New Mexico Publ. Biol. No. 6. Family ASPLENIACEAE [1/5/5] Asplenium spleenwort Bennert, W. & G. Fischer. 1993. Biosystematics and evolution of the Asplenium trichomanes complex. Webbia 48:743-760. Wagner, W.H. Jr., R.C. Moran, C.R. Werth. 1993. Aspleniaceae, pp. 228-245. IN: Flora of North America, vol.2. Oxford Univ. Press. palmeri Maxon [M&H; Wagner & Moran 1993] Palmer’s spleenwort platyneuron (Linnaeus) Britton, Sterns, & Poggenburg [M&H; Wagner & Moran 1993] ebony spleenwort resiliens Kunze [M&H; W&S; Wagner & Moran 1993] black-stem spleenwort septentrionale (Linnaeus) Hoffmann [M&H; W&S; Wagner & Moran 1993] forked spleenwort trichomanes Linnaeus [Bennert & Fischer 1993; M&H; W&S; Wagner & Moran 1993] maidenhair spleenwort Family AZOLLACEAE [1/1/1] Azolla mosquito-fern Lumpkin, T.A. 1993. Azollaceae, pp. 338-342. IN: Flora of North America, vol. 2. Oxford Univ. Press. caroliniana Willdenow : Reports in W&S apparently belong to Azolla mexicana Presl, though Azolla caroliniana is known adjacent to NM near the Texas State line [Lumpkin 1993]. mexicana Schlechtendal & Chamisso ex K. Presl [Lumpkin 1993; M&H] Mexican mosquito-fern Family DENNSTAEDTIACEAE [1/1/1] Pteridium bracken-fern Jacobs, C.A. & J.H. Peck. Pteridium, pp. 201-203. IN: Flora of North America, vol. 2. Oxford Univ. Press. aquilinum (Linnaeus) Kuhn var. pubescens Underwood [Jacobs & Peck 1993; M&H; W&S] bracken-fern Family DRYOPTERIDACEAE [6/13/13] Athyrium lady-fern Kato, M. 1993. Athyrium, pp.
    [Show full text]