DOCSLIB.ORG

Sami, Bahgat Abdulkareem (2015) Quantitative Morphology of the Lumbar Facets, Muscles and Fascia in Relation to Core Stability

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sami, Bahgat Abdulkareem (2015) Quantitative Morphology of the Lumbar Facets, Muscles and Fascia in Relation to Core Stability Sami, Bahgat Abdulkareem (2015) Quantitative morphology of the lumbar facets, muscles and fascia in relation to core stability. PhD thesis. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/6506/ Copyright and moral rights for this thesis are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Glasgow Theses Service http://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] Quantitative Morphology of the Lumbar Facets, Muscles and Fascia in Relation to Core Stability Bahgat Abdulkareem Sami MBChB, MSc Anatomy and Histology Laboratory of Human Anatomy University of Glasgow Submitted in the fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Anatomy and Histology To the: School of Life Sciences College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences University of Glasgow June, 2015 Abstract The morphology and function of the lumbar region is poorly understood. Better understanding of lumbar regional anatomy may enable improved understanding of lumbar stability and may also improve the clinical management of low back pain. Extensive researches have been carried out on the thoracolumbar anatomy and biomechanics. However, these studies lacked detailed anatomical knowledge about the morphology and function of the lumbar region. This study aims to provide a precise and detailed description of the anatomy of the lumbar spine and its supporting structures. A detailed and thorough literature review of background data was undertaken. Gross degenerative features in the lumbar vertebrae were documented. Three dimensional models of the superior and inferior lumbar articular facets were created by Microscribe. This allowed calculation of the facet orientation and surface area by Rhinoceros software. The surface area was increased towards the inferior vertebral levels, while the orientation became less sagittal inferiorly. The investigations suggest that the coronally oriented facet protects and supports the facet joint, while the sagittal orientation may predispose the facet joint to degenerative spondylisthesis. Gross observation of the thoracolumbar fascia documented the superficial myofascial thickenings, decussation and connections. The posterior and middle layers of the thoracolumbar fascia were identified. A three dimensional model enabled visualization of the bilaminar layers of the fascia which was reconstructed in a virtual space. The morphological measurements of the lumbar multifidus, longissimus and iliocostalis muscles were taken. The cross sectional area of the multifidus muscle was increased gradually towards the L5 level. The foot prints of the multifidus, longissimus, iliocostalis lumborum and inter-spinalis muscles enabled the measurement of the surface areas of the attachments of these muscles. The histological study revealed the fibrous enthesis of the iliocostalis muscle and its indirect attachment to the transverse process of the lumbar spine. The multifidus muscle is attached by a fibrocartilaginous enthesis to the articular process and the facet joint capsule. This study suggests that multifidus muscle supports and ii stabilizes the facet joints. The lumbar enthesis investigation should receive more attention in future studies. The clinical implications of different lumbar structures and functions may provide insight about the lumbar dysfunction. The ability to identify such differences in situ may facilitate varied clinical management of the various types of lumbar disorders. iii Table of contents Abstract ii List of Figures ix List of Tables xi Publications resulted from this thesis xii Acknowledgement xiii Author’s Declaration xiv Preface 1 Chapter 1 Introduction 5 1.1 Core stability and low back pain 6 1.2 Anatomy of the lumbar vertebrae 9 1.2.1 The lumbar facet joints and low back pain 13 1.2.2 The curvature shape of the facets 14 1.2.3 Facet orientation and tropism 14 1.2.4 The surface area of the articular facets 16 1.3 The superficial lumbar myofascial tissues 18 1.3.1 The latissimus dorsi and the gluteus maximus muscles 21 1.3.2 The spinal ligaments 22 1.3.3 Viscoelastic tissues 23 1.4 Anatomy of the lumbar musculature 25 1.4.1 The erector spinae muscle 27 1.4.2 The lumbar multifidus muscle 30 1.4.3 The lumbar inter-spinalis muscles 32 iv 1.4.4 The transversus abdominis muscle 33 1.4.5 The cross sectional area 35 1.4.6 Muscle fibre angles 36 1.5 The attachment of the lumbar muscles 38 1.5.1 Entheses 38 1.5.2 Histological structure of the muscles attachment 41 1.6 Aim of the study 42 Chapter 2 Materials and Methods 44 2.1 Three dimensional modelling of the lumbar facets 45 2.1.1 Specimens 45 2.1.2 Gross observation 45 2.1.3 Three-dimensional modelling of the articular facet 46 2.2 The superficial myofascial interactions 49 2.2.1 Specimens 49 2.2.2 Measuring fibre angles by ImageJ software 49 2.2.3 Measuring fibre angles by Rhinoceros software 50 2.2.4 The lateral myofascial connections 53 2.3 The morphology of the lumbar para-spinal muscles 54 2.3.1 Specimens 54 2.3.2 The direction of the muscle fibres 54 2.3.3 The attachment surface area of the para-spinal muscles 57 2.3.4 The cross-sectional area of the multifidus muscle 58 2.4 Histologic study of the lumbar muscles attachment 60 2.4.1 Specimens 60 v 2.4.2 Bone and soft tissue block resection 60 2.4.3 Decalcification process 61 Chapter 3 Results 62 3.1 Three dimensional measurements of the lumbar facets 63 3.1.1 Gross observation 63 3.1.2 The curvature shape of the articular facet 65 3.1.3 The surface area of the articular facet 65 3.1.4 The orientation of the articular facet 67 3.2 The superficial myofascial interactions 69 3.2.1 The thoracolumbar fascia 69 3.2.2 The myofascial connections 71 3.2.3 The lateral raphe and the interfacial triangle 73 3.2.4 Direction of the thoracolumbar fibres 76 3.3 The morphology of the lumbar para-spinal muscles 79 3.3.1 Gross observations 79 3.3.2 The direction of the muscle fibres 83 3.3.3 The attachment surface area of the para-spinal muscles 83 3.3.4 Cross sectional area of the multifidus muscle 86 3.4 Histologic study of the lumbar muscles attachment 87 3.4.1 Gross observations 87 3.4.2 Histological evidence 87 vi Chapter 4 Discussion 91 4.1 Three dimensional measurements of the lumbar facets 92 4.1.1 Gross observation 92 4.1.2 The curvature shape of the articular facet 92 4.1.3 The surface area of the articular facet 93 4.1.4 The orientation of the articular facet 94 4.2 The superficial myofascial interactions 96 4.2.1 The thoracolumbar fascia 96 4.2.2 The myofascial connections 97 4.2.3 The lateral raphe and the inter-facial triangle 97 4.2.4 Direction of the thoracolumbar fibres 98 4.3 The morphology of the lumbar para-spinal muscles 99 4.3.1 Gross observations 99 4.3.2 The direction of the muscle fibres 100 4.3.3 The attachment surface area of the para-spinal muscles 100 4.3.4 Cross sectional area of the multifidus muscle 101 4.4 Histologic study of the lumbar muscles attachment 103 Chapter 5 Conclusions 106 5.1 Three dimensional modelling of the lumbar facets 107 5.2 The superficial myofascial interactions 108 5.3 The morphology of the lumbar para-spinal muscles 109 5.4 The histological findings 110 vii Chapter 6 References 112 Appendices 139 I The embalming process of the Laboratory of Human Anatomy 14 0 II Processing of histological specimens 14 1 III Rotatory microtome sections 143 IV Modified Masson’s trichrome staining 145 V Digital photography 147 VI Digital measurements with ImageJ 148 VII Reconstruction technique 149 viii List of Figures Figure Title Page number number 1.1 The lateral sides of the of the first lumbar vertebra 10 1.2 The parts of a typical lumbar vertebra 11 1.3 The joints between two lumbar vertebrae 12 1.4 Posterior view of the lumbar region 29 2.1 The classification of the shape of the facet curvature 45 2.2 Three dimensional perspective view of the lumbar facets 47 2.3 Three dimensional models of the superior lumbar superior facets 48 2.4 Schematic illustration over the thoracolumbar fascia 50 2.5 Three dimensional model of the superficial and deep fibres of the 52 posterior layer of the TLF. 2.6 Schematic representation from the three dimensional model of the 52 deep fibres of the posterior layer of the TLF. 2.7 The measuring procedure of the direction of the iliocostalis 56 lumborum and the multifidus muscles 2.8 The iliocostalis lumborum and longissimus muscles were removed 57 to uncover the multifidus muscle 2.9 Deep dissection of the right lumbar region 58 2.10 Segment of the right multifidus muscle 59 3.1 The anterior compression of the vertebral body 63 3.2 A posterosuperior view of the L5 vertebra 64 3.3 The mean facet surface area (mm2) for each lumbar vertebral level 66 3.4 The mean comparison of facet area (mm2) between the superior 67 and inferior facets for each lumbar vertebral level 3.5 The mean facet angle degree (°) of articular facts at each lumbar 68 level 3.6 The superficial fibres of the posterior layer of the thoracolumbar 69 fascia decussated below the level of L4 spinous process 3.7 The decussation of the superficial fibres of the posterior layer of the 70 thoracolumbar fascia 3.8 Lateral view of the right gluteal region, demonstrating the 71 superficial
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Scapular Winging Is a Rare Disorder Often Caused by Neuromuscular Imbalance in the Scapulothoracic Stabilizer Muscles
    SCAPULAR WINGING Scapular winging is a rare disorder often caused by neuromuscular imbalance in the scapulothoracic stabilizer muscles. Lesions of the long thoracic nerve and spinal accessory nerves are the most common cause. Patients report diffuse neck, shoulder girdle, and upper back pain, which may be debilitating, associated with abduction and overhead activities. Accurate diagnosis and detection depend on appreciation on comprehensive physical examination. Although most cases resolve nonsurgically, surgical treatment of scapular winging has been met with success. True incidence is largely unknown because of under diagnosis. Most commonly it is categorized anatomically as medial or lateral shift of the inferior angle of the scapula. Primary winging occurs when muscular weakness disrupts the normal balance of the scapulothoracic complex. Secondary winging occurs when pathology of the shoulder joint pathology. Delay in diagnosis may lead to traction brachial plexopathy, periscapular muscle spasm, frozen shoulder, subacromial impingement, and thoracic outlet syndrome. Anatomy and Biomechanics Scapula is rotated 30° anterior on the chest wall; 20° forward in the sagittal plane; the inferior angle is tilted 3° upward. It serves as the attachment site for 17 muscles. The trapezius muscle accomplishes elevation of the scapula in the cranio-caudal axis and upward rotation. The serratus anterior and pectoralis major and minor muscles produce anterior and lateral motion, described as scapular protraction. Normal Scapulothoracic abduction: As the limb is elevated, the effect is an upward and lateral rotation of the inferior pole of scapula. Periscapular weakness resulting from overuse may manifest as scapular dysfunction (ie, winging). Serratus Anterior Muscle Origin From the first 9 ribs Insert The medial border of the scapula.
    [Show full text]
  • Thoracic Outlet and Pectoralis Minor Syndromes
    S EMINARS IN V ASCULAR S URGERY 27 (2014) 86– 117 Available online at www.sciencedirect.com www.elsevier.com/locate/semvascsurg Thoracic outlet and pectoralis minor syndromes n Richard J. Sanders, MD , and Stephen J. Annest, MD Presbyterian/St. Luke's Medical Center, 1719 Gilpin, Denver, CO 80218 article info abstract Compression of the neurovascular bundle to the upper extremity can occur above or below the clavicle; thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is above the clavicle and pectoralis minor syndrome is below. More than 90% of cases involve the brachial plexus, 5% involve venous obstruction, and 1% are associate with arterial obstruction. The clinical presentation, including symptoms, physical examination, pathology, etiology, and treatment differences among neurogenic, venous, and arterial TOS syndromes. This review details the diagnostic testing required to differentiate among the associated conditions and recommends appropriate medical or surgical treatment for each compression syndrome. The long- term outcomes of patients with TOS and pectoralis minor syndrome also vary and depend on duration of symptoms before initiation of physical therapy and surgical intervention. Overall, it can be expected that 480% of patients with these compression syndromes can experience functional improvement of their upper extremity; higher for arterial and venous TOS than for neurogenic compression. & 2015 Published by Elsevier Inc. 1. Introduction compression giving rise to neurogenic TOS (NTOS) and/or neurogenic PMS (NPMS). Much less common is subclavian Compression of the neurovascular bundle of the upper and axillary vein obstruction giving rise to venous TOS (VTOS) extremity can occur above or below the clavicle. Above the or venous PMS (VPMS).
    [Show full text]
  • The Erector Spinae Plane Block a Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic Pain
    CHRONIC AND INTERVENTIONAL PAIN BRIEF TECHNICAL REPORT The Erector Spinae Plane Block A Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic Pain Mauricio Forero, MD, FIPP,*Sanjib D. Adhikary, MD,† Hector Lopez, MD,‡ Calvin Tsui, BMSc,§ and Ki Jinn Chin, MBBS (Hons), MMed, FRCPC|| Case 1 Abstract: Thoracic neuropathic pain is a debilitating condition that is often poorly responsive to oral and topical pharmacotherapy. The benefit A 67-year-old man, weight 116 kg and height 188 cm [body of interventional nerve block procedures is unclear due to a paucity of ev- mass index (BMI), 32.8 kg/m2] with a history of heavy smoking idence and the invasiveness of the described techniques. In this report, we and paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia controlled on ateno- describe a novel interfascial plane block, the erector spinae plane (ESP) lol, was referred to the chronic pain clinic with a 4-month history block, and its successful application in 2 cases of severe neuropathic pain of severe left-sided chest pain. A magnetic resonance imaging (the first resulting from metastatic disease of the ribs, and the second from scan of his thorax at initial presentation had been reported as nor- malunion of multiple rib fractures). In both cases, the ESP block also pro- mal, and the working diagnosis at the time of referral was post- duced an extensive multidermatomal sensory block. Anatomical and radio- herpetic neuralgia. He reported constant burning and stabbing logical investigation in fresh cadavers indicates that its likely site of action neuropathic pain of 10/10 severity on the numerical rating score is at the dorsal and ventral rami of the thoracic spinal nerves.
    [Show full text]
  • An Anatomical Illustrated Analysis of Yoga Postures Targeting the Back and Spine Through Cadaveric Study of Back Musculature Hana Fatima Panakkat1, Deborah Merrick*2
    ISSN 2563-7142 ORIGINAL ARTICLE An Anatomical Illustrated Analysis of Yoga Postures Targeting the Back and Spine Through Cadaveric Study of Back Musculature Hana Fatima Panakkat1, Deborah Merrick*2 Panakkat HF, Merrick D. An Anatomical Illustrated present the findings, unique hand-drawn illustrations Analysis of Yoga Postures Targeting the Back and were used to depict the musculature found to be Spine Through Cadaveric Study of Back Musculature. highly active with each Yoga posture, with the erector Int J Cadaver Stud Ant Var. 2020;1(1):33-38. spinae muscles appearing prominent throughout. The combined approach of using hand-drawn illustrations Abstract with cadaveric dissection to present the anatomical Back pain is a debilitating lifestyle disease that affects analysis has allowed a seamless understanding of a large proportion of the world’s population at some complex anatomical concepts alongside the nuances point in their life. Absences from work due to this of intricate gross anatomy. This study highlights the have a huge economic impact on the patient, their importance of the inclusion of cadaveric dissection employer and the healthcare providers who seek to as a pedagogical tool in medical curriculum through support their recovery. Unfortunately, back pain is exploring the anatomical basis of Yoga, also allowing often resistant to treatment and intervention, therefore the possibility of using the workings of Yoga to aid alternative therapies such as Yoga are being explored. anatomical teaching. A greater understanding of this Within the literature, five Yoga postures were may help guide personalized Yoga regimes, which may identified to be associated with reduced back pain allow alternative therapies to become integrated into in patients suffering from Chronic lower back pain.
    [Show full text]
  • Scapular Dyskinesis
    Scapular Dyskinesis Presented by: Scott Sevinsky MSPT Presented by: Scott Sevinsky SPT 1 What is Scapular Dyskinesis? Alteration in the normal static or dynamic position or motion of the scapula during coupled scapulohumeral movements. Other names given to this catch-all phrase include: “floating scapula” and “lateral scapular slide”.1, 2 1 Alterations in scapular position and motion occur in 68 – 100% of patients with shoulder injuries. Scapular Dyskinesis Classification System 1, 3 Pattern Definitions Inferior angle At rest, the inferior medial scapular border may be prominent dorsally. During arm motion, the inferior (type I) angle tilts dorsally and the acromion tilts ventrally over the top of the thorax. The axis of the rotation is in the horizontal plane. Medial border At rest, the entire medial border may be prominent dorsally. During arm motion, the medial scapular (type II) border tilts dorsally off the thorax. The axis of the rotation is vertical in the frontal plane. Superior border At rest, the superior border of the scapula may be elevated and the scapula can also be anteriorly (type III) displaced. During arm motion, a shoulder shrug initiates movement without significant winging of the scapula occurring. The axis of this motion occurs in the sagittal plane. Symmetric At rest, the position of both scapula are relatively symmetrical, taking into account that the dominant scapulohumeral arm may be slightly lower. During arm motion, the scapulae rotate symmetrically upward such that the (type IV) inferior angles translate laterally away from the midline and the scapular medial border remains flush against the thoracic wall. The reverse occurs during lowering of the arm.
    [Show full text]
  • Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Retrolaminar Block a Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Anatomical Study
    Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine: first published as 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000798 on 1 October 2018. Downloaded from REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND ACUTE PAIN BRIEF TECHNICAL REPORT Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Retrolaminar Block A Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Anatomical Study Sanjib Das Adhikary, MD,* Stephanie Bernard, MD,† Hector Lopez, MD,‡ and Ki Jinn Chin, FRCPC§ As with the ESP block, it has been postulated that the clinical ef- Background and Objectives: The erector spinae plane (ESP) and fects of the retrolaminar block may be explained by spread of lo- retrolaminar blocks are ultrasound-guided techniques for thoracoabdominal cal anesthetic into the paravertebral space,6 but this mechanism wall analgesia involving injection into the musculofascial plane between has never been systematically investigated. However, there are the paraspinal back muscles and underlying thoracic vertebrae. The ESP significant anatomical and technical differences between the 2 block targets the tips of the transverse processes, whereas the retrolaminar techniques: the retrolaminar block targets the lamina instead of block targets the laminae. We investigated if there were differences in the transverse process, and thus the injection point is more medial injectate spread between the 2 techniques that would have implications and deeper. The muscle layer over the lamina and adjacent to the for their clinical effect. spinous processes is thicker, being composed of the spinalis portion Methods: The blocks were performed in 3 fresh cadavers. The ESP and of the erector spinae muscle group as well as the transversospinalis retrolaminar blocks were performed on opposite sides of each cadaver at muscle group, which comprises the multifidus, rotatores, semis- the T5 vertebral level.
    [Show full text]
  • Anatomy, Shoulder and Upper Limb, Shoulder Muscles
    Eovaldi BJ, Varacallo M. Anatomy, Shoulder and Upper Limb, Shoulder Muscles. [Updated 2018 Dec 3]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2018 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK534836/ Anatomy, Shoulder and Upper Limb, Shoulder Muscles Authors Benjamin J. Eovaldi1; Matthew Varacallo2. Affilations 1 University of Tennessee HSC 2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kentucky School of Medicine Last Update: December 3, 2018. Introduction The shoulder joint (glenohumeral joint) is a ball and socket joint with the most extensive range of motion in the human body. The muscles of the shoulder dynamically function in performing a wide range of motion, specifically the rotator cuff muscles which function to move the shoulder and arm as well as provide structural integrity to the shoulder joint. The different movements of the shoulder are: abduction, adduction, flexion, extension, internal rotation, and external rotation.[1] The central bony structure of the shoulder is the scapula. All the muscles of the shoulder joint interact with the scapula. At the lateral aspect of the scapula is the articular surface of the glenohumeral joint, the glenoid cavity. The glenoid cavity is peripherally surrounded and reinforced by the glenoid labrum, shoulder joint capsule, supporting ligaments, and the myotendinous attachments of the rotator cuff muscles. The muscles of the shoulder play a critical role in providing stability to the shoulder joint. The primary muscle group that supports the shoulder joint is the rotator cuff muscles. The four rotator cuff muscles include:[2] • Supraspinatus • Infraspinatus • Teres minor • Subscapularis. Structure and Function The upper extremity is attached to the appendicular skeleton by way of the sternoclavicular joint.
    [Show full text]
  • Levator Scapulae Muscle Asymmetry Presenting As a Palpable Neck Mass: CT Evaluation
    Levator Scapulae Muscle Asymmetry Presenting as a Palpable Neck Mass: CT Evaluation Barry A. Shpizner1 and Roy A . Hollida/ PURPOSE: To define the normal CT anatomy of the levator scapulae muscle and to report on a series of five patients who presented with a palpable mass in the posterior triangle due to asymmetry of the levator scapulae muscles. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The contrast-enhanced CT examinations of the neck in 25 patients without palpable masses were reviewed to es tablish the normal CT appearance of the levator scapulae muscle. We retrospectively reviewed the contrast-enhanced CT examinations of the neck in five patients who presented with a palpable mass secondary to asymmetric levator scapulae muscles . RESULTS: In three patients who had undergone unilateral radical neck dissection, hypertrophy of the ipsi lateral levator scapulae muscle was found. In one patient, the normal levator scapulae muscle produced a fa ctitious "mass" due to atrophy of the contralateral levator scapulae muscle. One patient had an intramuscular neoplasm of the levator scapulae. CONCLUSION: Asymmetry of the levator scapulae muscles , an unusual cause of a posterior triangle mass, can be diagnosed using CT. Index terms: Neck, muscles; Neck, computed tomography AJNR 14:461-464, Mar/ Apr 1993 The levator scapulae muscle can be identified between January 1987 and March 1991 were reviewed. A ll readily on axial images by its characteristic ap­ patients presented with a palpable mass in the posterior pearance and its relationship to the other muscles triangle of the infrahyoid neck. The patients, three men forming the boundaries of the posterior triangle.
    [Show full text]
  • The Thoracolumbar Fascia: Anatomy, Function and Clinical Considerations F
    Journal of Anatomy J. Anat. (2012) doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2012.01511.x REVIEW The thoracolumbar fascia: anatomy, function and clinical considerations F. H. Willard,1 A. Vleeming,1,2 M. D. Schuenke,1 L. Danneels2 and R. Schleip3 1Department of Anatomy, University of New England College of Osteopathic Medicine, Biddeford, ME, USA 2Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium 3Fascia Research Group, Division of Neurophysiology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany Abstract In this overview, new and existent material on the organization and composition of the thoracolumbar fascia (TLF) will be evaluated in respect to its anatomy, innervation biomechanics and clinical relevance. The integration of the passive connective tissues of the TLF and active muscular structures surrounding this structure are discussed, and the relevance of their mutual interactions in relation to low back and pelvic pain reviewed. The TLF is a girdling structure consisting of several aponeurotic and fascial layers that separates the paraspinal muscles from the muscles of the posterior abdominal wall. The superficial lamina of the posterior layer of the TLF (PLF) is domi- nated by the aponeuroses of the latissimus dorsi and the serratus posterior inferior. The deeper lamina of the PLF forms an encapsulating retinacular sheath around the paraspinal muscles. The middle layer of the TLF (MLF) appears to derive from an intermuscular septum that developmentally separates the epaxial from the hypaxial musculature. This septum forms during the fifth and sixth weeks of gestation. The paraspinal retinacular sheath (PRS) is in a key position to act as a ‘hydraulic amplifier’, assisting the paraspinal muscles in supporting the lumbo- sacral spine.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dorsal Scapular Artery - a Proposed Term for the Artery to the Rhomboid Muscles
    The Dorsal Scapular Artery - A Proposed Term for the Artery to the Rhomboid Muscles DONALD F. HUELKE Department of Anatomy, The University of Michigan, Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan The terminology of the arterial supply from the thyrocervical trunk in 77.5% of to the rhomboid and trapezius muscles is sides). (2) That the artery which sup- quite confusing in that each artery has plies the rhomboid muscles take the name been given two different names; names of the nerve along with which it passes, which are related to the variations in the and be designated the dorsal scapular ar- origin of these vessels. According to the tery. This artery arises from the second recent Paris Revision of the terminology or third part of the subclavian artery, sepa- (’55) one of these is the transverse cer- rate from the transverse cervical artery, vical artery, of the thyrocervical trunk, in approximately 70% of the sides. Thus, which gives rise to a superficial and a only one term is used for each artery. deep branch to the trapezius and rhom- If this modification in terminology is to boid muscles respectively. When these be accepted internationally, there must be branches arise separately, the trapezial an agreement among anatomists as to its branch is called the “superficial cervical “usual” site of origin. Only by comparing artery” and that to the rhomboids, the data on the origins of these arteries from “descending scapular artery.” Thus, each various countries can this end be achieved. vessel has two different names. Generally, Therefore, it is the purpose of this report an artery is named by the area of supply, to compare the data on these vessels of irrespective of its origin or variations.
    [Show full text]
  • SCAPULAR and THORACIC PLACEMENT in KAYAKING By
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by British Columbia's network of post-secondary digital repositories SCAPULAR AND THORACIC PLACEMENT IN KAYAKING by Noah Nochasak THOMPSON RIVERS UNIVERSITY A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Bachelor of Interdisciplinary Studies KAMLOOPS, BRITISH COLUMBIA April, 2018 Thesis examining committee: Sarah Osberg (MSc), Thesis Supervisor, Master in Outdoor, Environmental and Sustainability Education Iain Stewart-Patterson (PhD), Committee Member, Doctorate of Philosophy Mark Rakobowchuk, (PhD), Committee Member, Doctorate of Kinesiology © Noah Nochasak, 2018 SCAPULAR AND THORACIC PLACEMENT IN KAYAKING 2 ABSTRACT Anatomical understanding is needed in kayaking scapular and thoracic placement, key elements to the forward stroke, to provide a more insightful understanding of the frequent amount of injuries to these areas, and hopefully quell them. What can be done to help serious kayakers see the forward stroke from a biological standpoint with limited resources to address this topic directly? With more information and references, kayakers will have a better chance of breaking down kayak motion and be able to use that knowledge to enhance their kayaking life. With adventure sports, the body is an especially vital tool. Kayaking performance becomes very poor with shoulder and back dysfunction; this is like a car with flat tires. A well-functioning body, aided by relevant human biological knowledge is useful to the adventurous kayaker to help propel the craft forward. Kayakers typically have very limited understanding of human anatomy and physiology. They tend to have a strong outdoor knowledge yet a weak knowledge of their own indoors.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendicular Muscles 355
    MUSCULAR SYSTEM OUTLINE 12.1 Muscles That Move the Pectoral Girdle and Upper Limb 355 12.1a Muscles That Move the Pectoral Girdle 355 12 12.1b Muscles That Move the Glenohumeral Joint/Arm 360 12.1c Arm and Forearm Muscles That Move the Elbow Joint/Forearm 363 12.1d Forearm Muscles That Move the Wrist Joint, Appendicular Hand, and Fingers 366 12.1e Intrinsic Muscles of the Hand 374 12.2 Muscles That Move the Pelvic Girdle and Lower Limb 377 Muscles 12.2a Muscles That Move the Hip Joint/Thigh 377 12.2b Thigh Muscles That Move the Knee Joint/Leg 381 12.2c Leg Muscles 385 12.2d Intrinsic Muscles of the Foot 391 MODULE 6: MUSCULAR SYSTEM mck78097_ch12_354-396.indd 354 2/14/11 3:25 PM Chapter Twelve Appendicular Muscles 355 he appendicular muscles control the movements of the upper 2. Identify the muscles that move the scapula and their actions. T and lower limbs, and stabilize and control the movements 3. Name the muscles of the glenohumeral joint, and explain of the pectoral and pelvic girdles. These muscles are organized how each moves the humerus. into groups based on their location in the body or the part of 4. Locate and name the muscles that move the elbow joint. the skeleton they move. Beyond their individual activities, these 5. Identify the muscles of the forearm, wrist joint, fingers, muscles also work in groups that are either synergistic or antago- and thumb. nistic. Refer to figure 10.14 to review how muscles are named, and Muscles that move the pectoral girdle and upper limbs are recall the first Study Tip! from chapter 11 that gives suggestions organized into specific groups: (1) muscles that move the pectoral for learning the muscles.
    [Show full text]