Preservation of Exceptional Vertebrate Assemblages in Middle Permian fluviolacustrine Mudstones of Kotel'nich, Russia: Stratigraphy, Sedimentology, and Taphonomy
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 319-320 (2012) 58–83 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/palaeo Preservation of exceptional vertebrate assemblages in Middle Permian fluviolacustrine mudstones of Kotel'nich, Russia: stratigraphy, sedimentology, and taphonomy Michael J. Benton a,⁎, Andrew J. Newell b, Al'bert Yu. Khlyupin c, Il'ya S. Shumov c, Gregory D. Price d, Andrey A. Kurkin e a School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1RJ, UK b British Geological Survey, Maclean Building, Wallingford OX10 8BB, UK c Vyatka Palaeontological Museum, Ulitsa Drelevskii 22, Kirov, Kirov Region 610000, Russia d School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK e Paleontological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Ulitsa Profsoyuznaya 123, Moscow 117997, Russia article info abstract Article history: The Kotel'nich locality in European Russia has long been a rich source of high-quality tetrapod fossils, including Received 2 July 2011 pareiasaurs, dicynodonts, gorgonopsians and theriodonts. The age of the Kotel'nich locality has been debated, but Received in revised form 13 December 2011 it corresponds to early Severodvinian in the Russian stratigraphic scheme, equivalent to the late Capitanian (late Accepted 2 January 2012 Middle Permian) on the international time scale. Remarkably, the majority of specimens are complete, quite un- Available online 8 January 2012 like those from most Russian Permo-Triassic red bed localities; commonest of all are 1–2-metre long pareia- saur skeletons of the genus Deltavjatia, preserved in hollows on top of a consolidated palaeosol horizon. Keywords: Taphonomy Previous taphonomic scenarios in the Russian literature have included suggestions that the animals were Tetrapod skeleton overwhelmed beneath sand dunes, mired in soft fluviatile sediments, caught at the bottom of a deep lake, Drought trapped in burrows, or dumped in fluviatile scours. It is probable that the pareiasaurs were searching for Fluvial scour water in a time of catastrophic aridification, and died, weakened, in shallow hollows. In this case, we also em- Permian phasise the importance of floodplain microtopography in creating the sedimentary conditions necessary for the Russia preservation of exceptional vertebrate assemblages in a slowly aggrading fluviolacustrine setting. Severodvinian © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Vyatkian 1. Introduction of the enclosed vertebrate fossils. This uncertainty is exemplified by the renowned Permian vertebrate locality of Kotel'nich in Russia. Vertebrate skeletons in ancient river deposits are commonly pre- Kotel'nich has yielded hundreds of complete skeletons of fossil served as lags within coarse-grained channel deposits where the re- reptiles, predominantly pareiasaurs and dicynodonts. The mode of mains have generally been transported, disarticulated and abraded. preservation of these skeletons has been debated (Hartmann- Less common, but often of greater paleontological importance, are Weinberg, 1933, 1937; Kashtanov, 1934; Ivakhnenko, 1987; Gubin, skeletons preserved within fine-grained floodplain deposits that are 1989; Tverdokhlebov and Shminke, 1990; Ochev, 1995; Khlyupin, often substantially complete and well preserved (Behrensmeyer, 2007; Sumin, 2009; Tverdokhlebov, 2009): were they preserved by 1988; Smith, 1993; Rogers and Kidwell, 2000; Therrien and miring in soft muds around water holes, deposited on the floor of a Fastovsky, 2000; Ryan et al., 2001; Smith and Swart, 2002; Straight lake, buried in situ within burrows, or washed into floodplain hol- and Eberth, 2002; Rogers, 2005; Eberth et al., 2007, 2010; González lows? Further, although the Kotel'nich locality has been known Riga and Astini, 2007). In comparison to coarse-grained channel de- since the 1930s, and it has been referred to hundreds of times in posits, floodplain mudstones often have a relatively uniform stratig- the vertebrate palaeontological literature, the geology and taphono- raphy that can be masked by syndepositional soil-forming processes my of the site have not been described. The aims of this paper are and this can lead to uncertainty regarding the original depositional (1) to outline the stratigraphy and sedimentology of the Middle environment of the muds as well as the life, death and preservation Permian continental red beds on the banks of the Vyatka River at Kotel'nich, which requires a presentation of the local stratigraphic scheme as well as new evidence for the dating of Kotel'nich in com- parison to the Karoo tetrapod biozones and the international marine ⁎ Corresponding author. Tel.: +44 954 5400; fax: +44 925 3385. time scale, and (2) to describe the taphonomy of recently excavated E-mail address: [email protected] (M.J. Benton). tetrapod skeletons, and to present evidence that the exceptional 0031-0182/$ – see front matter © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2012.01.005 M.J. Benton et al. / Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 319-320 (2012) 58–83 59 preservation of the fauna results largely from an arid episode and the Agafonovo (58.18637N, 48.32864E). The spectacular red, yellow, rapid infill of floodplain hollows. and brown colours of the near horizontally-bedded clastic sediments Museum abbreviations. KPM, Vyatka Palaeontological Museum, have been noted by previous authors (Fig. 4). Kirov, Kirov Oblast, Russia; PIN, Paleontological Institute, Russian Geological work on the Kotel'nich red beds began rather late, with Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia. the first geological mapping only 100 years ago (Krotov, 1912). This was because the area was remote from major cities, and seemingly 2. Geological background devoid of mineral potential. The Vyatka River had long been a major transport artery, but the town of Kotel'nich remained a very remote The Permo-Triassic red beds of Russia represent an enormous area outpost of the Russian Empire until the railway from St Petersburg of outcrop, covering 1.4×106 km2 of European Russia (Fig. 1), and to Vyatka opened in 1905. Following continued repression during spanning over 40 million years, from the end of the Early Permian Soviet times, and substantial decline of industry after 1990, Kotel'nich (Ufimian; Kungurian) to the end of the Middle Triassic (Bukobay; remains a remote and undeveloped town. The geology of the Permian Ladinian). These units provide an important record of changing terres- red beds was revised by Ignat'ev (1962, 1963) and Tikhvinskaya trial environments and ecosystems before, during, and after the end- (1946),andreviewedbyNalivkin (1973) and Lozovskiy and Esaulova Permian mass extinction, including long-term aridification of climates (1998). In these works, the sedimentary rocks were interpreted as flu- and major changes in sedimentary regimes across the Permo-Triassic viatile and lacustrine. Tverdokhlebov and Shminke (1990) were the boundary (Newell et al., 1999, 2010; Golubev, 2000; Zharkov and first to argue that the yellow sandstones of the Boroviki Member Chumakov, 2001; Tverdokhlebov et al., 2003, 2005; Benton et al., (Coffa, 1999) were aeolian in origin. Then, Goman'kov (1997), Coffa 2004; Shishkin et al., 2006; Shcherbakov, 2008; Krassilov and Karasev, (1999),andGolubev (2000) presented summary accounts of the sedi- 2009; Benton, 2012). mentology and stratigraphy of the Kotel'nich succession, each based One of the most remarkable localities in the Russian Middle and on original and independent fieldwork, and Tverdokhlebov (2009) Late Permian is Kotel'nich, in Kirov Oblast, the source of hundreds added further first-hand observations. of tetrapod specimens since their first discovery in 1893. In his semi- The Kotel'nich red beds are renowned for their abundant and nal work on the stratigraphy of the Russian Permian tetrapods, exquisite tetrapod fossils, and yet earlier geologists did not pay these Efremov (1937, 1941) established two lower, dinocephalian, com- much attention (see Ochev, 1995; Ochev and Surkov, 2000 for historical plexes (I and II), and a third, pareiasaurian, complex (III) based initial- surveys). Krotov (1894, 1912) recorded isolated bones from the west ly on finds from Kotel'nich and Sokolki, a site on the North Dvina bank of the Vyatka River just south of Kotel'nich, at a locality later River. The pareiasaurian complex was subsequently divided into termed ‘Kotel'nich-1’. In 1933, S. G. Kashtanov, a young hydrogeologist three, the Kotel'nich, Ilinsko'ye, and Sokolki subcomplexes, occupying from Kazan' University, discovered two complete pareiasaur skeletons the bulk of the Tatarian Russian Stage (details in Golubev, 2000). near the village of Vanyushonki, on the river bank 18 km south of Kotel'nich was then one of the fundamental locations for understand- Kotel'nich (Figs. 2, 3), and he found a further two or three in 1935, ing the evolution of Middle and Late Permian tetrapods from the ear- 2 km upstream (Kashtanov, 1934). The skeletons were incomplete as liest days of palaeontological work in Russia, and it was seen they had been partially eroded by the action of the Vyatka River, but internationally as the equal and equivalent of the succession of tetra- Kashtanov excavated some of this material and sent it to the Paleonto- pod zones in the Karoo Basin in South Africa (e.g. Olson, 1962; logical Institute (PIN) in Moscow. The Moscow palaeontologists came to Anderson and Cruickshank,