DOCSLIB.ORG

Arms for Their Defence

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arms for Their Defence Cleveland State Law Review Volume 57 Issue 3 Article 3 2009 Arms for Their Defence - An Historical, Legal and Textual Analysis of the English Right to Have Arms and Whether the Second Amendment Should Be Incorporated in McDonald v. City of Chicago Patrick J. Charles Follow this and additional works at: https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clevstlrev Part of the Second Amendment Commons How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! Recommended Citation Patrick J. Charles, Arms for Their Defence - An Historical, Legal and Textual Analysis of the English Right to Have Arms and Whether the Second Amendment Should Be Incorporated in McDonald v. City of Chicago , 57 Clev. St. L. Rev. 351 (2009) available at https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clevstlrev/vol57/iss3/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at EngagedScholarship@CSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cleveland State Law Review by an authorized editor of EngagedScholarship@CSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “ARMS FOR THEIR DEFENCE”?: AN HISTORICAL, LEGAL, AND TEXTUAL ANALYSIS OF THE ENGLISH RIGHT TO HAVE ARMS AND WHETHER THE SECOND AMENDMENT SHOULD BE INCORPORATED IN MCDONALD V. CITY OF CHICAGO PATRICK J. CHARLES* That the subjects which are Protestants may have arms for their defence suitable to their conditions and as allowed by law.—English Declaration of Rights of 1689 I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................... 352 II. THE 1689 ENGLISH DECLARATION OF RIGHTS..................... 356 A. The Road to an Affirmed Allowance to “Have Arms”............................................................... 358 B. The Creation of the Allowance to “Have Arms”............................................................... 363 III. CORRECTING THE “INDIVIDUAL RIGHT” INTERPRETATION OF THE CONVENTION ............................... 383 IV. THE GAME ACTS AND UNDERSTANDING “ARMS FOR THEIR DEFENCE” .......................................................... 386 V. THE DISARMING OF PAPISTS AND THE ALLOWANCE OF ARMS FOR SELF-DEFENSE............................................... 398 VI. THE MILITIA ACT OF 1757................................................... 403 VII. GRANVILLE SHARP IN UNDERSTANDING THE ALLOWANCE TO “HAVE ARMS”........................................... 411 VIII. BLACKSTONE’S COMMENTARIES AND THE ALLOWANCE TO “HAVE ARMS”........................................... 414 IX. ST. GEORGE TUCKER ON BLACKSTONE’S COMMENTARIES AND THE ALLOWANCE TO “HAVE ARMS” ..................................................................... 418 X. THE AMERICAN PERSPECTIVE ON “HAVE ARMS” ................ 421 XI. CONCLUSION........................................................................ 454 * Patrick J. Charles is the author of The Second Amendment: The Intent and Its Interpretation by the States and the Supreme Court (2009), Irreconcilable Grievances: The Events that Shaped the Declaration of Independence (2008), and Washington’s Decision: The Story of George Washington’s Decision to Reaccept Black Enlistments in the Continental Army, December 31, 1775 (2006). The recipient of the 2008 Judge John R. Brown Award for his research on the Second Amendment and States’ “bear arms” provisions, Patrick received his juris doctor from the Cleveland-Marshallg College of Law. Patrick would like to thank Colin Nicolson, David Konig, Carl T. Bogus, and Kristen Brown for their valuable advice, help, and assistance. He would also like to thank Laura Bedard and the Georgetown Law Library’s Special Collections staff for their help in finding materials and allowing access to their collection. Finally, Patrick would like to specially thank Lois Schwoerer and Erin Kidwell for their detailed critiques and improvements to the article. Their comments were especially helpful. 351 Published by EngagedScholarship@CSU, 2009 1 352 CLEVELAND STATE LAW REVIEW [Vol. 57:351 I. INTRODUCTION In early 2010, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral arguments for McDonald v. City of Chicago to determine whether the Second Amendment is incorporated through the Fourteenth Amendment and applies directly to the states.1 Coming less than two years after the Court’s landmark decision in District of Columbia v. Heller,2 the issues affecting the Fourteenth Amendment are two-fold. First, the Court will determine whether the Second Amendment is incorporated through the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause. Second, the Court will determine if the Second Amendment applies to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment’s Privileges and Immunities Clause. While the “privileges and immunities” issue will receive the overwhelming attention of the legal community, what will seemingly be ignored is the history of the Anglo-American tradition of “having arms,” for its history may prove crucial as to whether the Second Amendment is incorporated through either the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process or Privileges and Immunities Clauses. In the wake of Heller, the first and only court to issue an opinion incorporating the Second Amendment was the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals’ vacated decision in Nordyke v. King.3 In incorporating the Second Amendment through the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause, the court determined that “the right to keep and bear arms is ‘deeply rooted in this Nation’s history and tradition’” and “is necessary to the Anglo-American conception of ordered liberty that we have inherited.”4 There is no denying that the limited “individual right” to defend against standing armies— foreign or domestic—predated the Constitution. However, there is no substantiating historical evidence that a right to own and use guns in the home was ever meant to be “fundamental to the American scheme of justice.”5 Given the Supreme Court’s holding in District of Columbia v. Heller, the Nordyke court’s conclusion was not at all surprising. The Court majority had already determined that the “District’s ban on handgun possession in the home violates the Second Amendment, as does its prohibition against rendering any lawful firearm in the home operable for the purpose of immediate self-defense.”6 The Second Amendment reads, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”7 Most legal scholars and historians argue that this right mirrors a provision in the 1689 English Declaration of Rights, which ensures that “subjects which are Protestants may have arms for their defence suitable to their conditions 1 NRA v. City of Chicago, 567 F.3d 856 (7th Cir. 2009), cert. granted sub nom. McDonald v. City of Chicago, 2009 U.S. LEXIS 5150 (U.S. Sept. 30, 2009) (No. 08-1521). 2 District of Columbia v. Heller, 128 S. Ct. 2783 (2008). 3 Nordyke v. King, 563 F.3d 439 (9th Cir. 2009), vacated en banc, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 16908 (D.C. Cir. July 29, 2009) (No. 07-15763). 4 Id. at 457. 5 Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145, 149 (1968). 6 Heller, 128 S. Ct. at 2821-22. 7 U.S. CONST. amend. II. https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clevstlrev/vol57/iss3/3 2 2009] ARMS FOR THEIR DEFENCE 353 and as allowed by law.”8 It is more than reasonable to assert that this provision heavily influenced the Second Amendment, because the Founding Fathers viewed the American Revolution as a reaffirmation of the Glorious Revolution.9 Therefore, it is fair to say that the Declaration of Rights’ “have arms” guarantee was the precursor to, if not the inspiration for, the Second Amendment. This fact is not only historically significant, it is also legally significant. It was the means by which the Supreme Court majority came to its determination in Heller. The Court stated that the English “right secured in 1689 as a result of the Stuarts’ abuses was by the time of the founding understood to be an individual right protecting against both public and private violence.”10 In other words, the Supreme Court majority interpreted the English “have arms” provision as a right to personal armed self-defense—an interpretation it thought the Founders understood to be the Second Amendment’s “central component.”11 This historical interpretation of the “have arms” provision laid the foundation for the decision in Nordyke. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals did not touch upon the history of the English right to “have arms.” Instead, it merely took the Heller majority’s analysis as sufficient to prove that an alleged right to own a gun for defense of the home was firmly rooted in the Anglo-American tradition. Both the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court majority have been misled. They have relied upon incomplete and misguided research of both the English “have arms” provision and the Founders’ understanding of that limited right.12 Both courts have been led to believe that lower-status Englishmen’s discontent with the gaming laws, coupled with their required duties in the militia, created a constitutional right to own arms to defend the home—a right that has never historically or legally existed. The problem is that Individual Right Scholars have seemingly ignored the abundant sources that explain exactly what the English allowance to “have arms” was meant to protect. First, the provision is an allowance—not a right—because it states that Protestants “may have arms.” Furthermore, it was conditioned on the arms being “suitable to their condition and as allowed by law.” Both phrases greatly limit an individual’s ability to possess arms. This was done intentionally,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Catalogue of the Earl Marshal's Papers at Arundel
    CONTENTS CONTENTS v FOREWORD by Sir Anthony Wagner, K.C.V.O., Garter King of Arms vii PREFACE ix LIST OF REFERENCES xi NUMERICAL KEY xiii COURT OF CHIVALRY Dated Cases 1 Undated Cases 26 Extracts from, or copies of, records relating to the Court; miscellaneous records concerning the Court or its officers 40 EARL MARSHAL Office and Jurisdiction 41 Precedence 48 Deputies 50 Dispute between Thomas, 8th Duke of Norfolk and Henry, Earl of Berkshire, 1719-1725/6 52 Secretaries and Clerks 54 COLLEGE OF ARMS General Administration 55 Commissions, appointments, promotions, suspensions, and deaths of Officers of Arms; applications for appointments as Officers of Arms; lists of Officers; miscellanea relating to Officers of Arms 62 Office of Garter King of Arms 69 Officers of Arms Extraordinary 74 Behaviour of Officers of Arms 75 Insignia and dress 81 Fees 83 Irregularities contrary to the rules of honour and arms 88 ACCESSIONS AND CORONATIONS Coronation of King James II 90 Coronation of King George III 90 Coronation of King George IV 90 Coronation of Queen Victoria 90 Coronation of King Edward VII and Queen Alexandra 90 Accession and Coronation of King George V and Queen Mary 96 Royal Accession and Coronation Oaths 97 Court of Claims 99 FUNERALS General 102 King George II 102 Augusta, Dowager Princess of Wales 102 King George III 102 King William IV 102 William Ewart Gladstone 103 Queen Victoria 103 King Edward VII 104 CEREMONIAL Precedence 106 Court Ceremonial; regulations; appointments; foreign titles and decorations 107 Opening of Parliament
    [Show full text]
  • Gaelic Scotland in the Colonial Imagination
    Gaelic Scotland in the Colonial Imagination Gaelic Scotland in the Colonial Imagination Anglophone Writing from 1600 to 1900 Silke Stroh northwestern university press evanston, illinois Northwestern University Press www .nupress.northwestern .edu Copyright © 2017 by Northwestern University Press. Published 2017. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication data are available from the Library of Congress. Except where otherwise noted, this book is licensed under a Creative Commons At- tribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. In all cases attribution should include the following information: Stroh, Silke. Gaelic Scotland in the Colonial Imagination: Anglophone Writing from 1600 to 1900. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 2017. For permissions beyond the scope of this license, visit www.nupress.northwestern.edu An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libraries working with Knowledge Unlatched. KU is a collaborative initiative designed to make high-quality books open access for the public good. More information about the initiative and links to the open-access version can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org Contents Acknowledgments vii Introduction 3 Chapter 1 The Modern Nation- State and Its Others: Civilizing Missions at Home and Abroad, ca. 1600 to 1800 33 Chapter 2 Anglophone Literature of Civilization and the Hybridized Gaelic Subject: Martin Martin’s Travel Writings 77 Chapter 3 The Reemergence of the Primitive Other? Noble Savagery and the Romantic Age 113 Chapter 4 From Flirtations with Romantic Otherness to a More Integrated National Synthesis: “Gentleman Savages” in Walter Scott’s Novel Waverley 141 Chapter 5 Of Celts and Teutons: Racial Biology and Anti- Gaelic Discourse, ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Advisory Opinions and the Problem of Legal Authority
    Vanderbilt Law Review Volume 74 Issue 3 April 2021 Article 5 4-2021 Advisory Opinions and the Problem of Legal Authority Christian R. Burset Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr Part of the Judges Commons, and the Jurisprudence Commons Recommended Citation Christian R. Burset, Advisory Opinions and the Problem of Legal Authority, 74 Vanderbilt Law Review 621 (2021) Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr/vol74/iss3/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vanderbilt Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Advisory Opinions and the Problem of Legal Authority Christian R. Burset* The prohibition against advisory opinions is fundamental to our understanding of federal judicial power, but we have misunderstood its origins. Discussions of the doctrine begin not with a constitutional text or even a court case, but a letter in which the Jay Court rejected President Washington’s request for legal advice. Courts and scholars have offered a variety of explanations for the Jay Court’s behavior. But they all depict the earliest Justices as responding to uniquely American concerns about advisory opinions. This Article offers a different explanation. Drawing on previously untapped archival sources, it shows that judges throughout the anglophone world—not only in the United States but also in England and British India— became opposed to advisory opinions in the second half of the eighteenth century. The death of advisory opinions was a global phenomenon, rooted in a period of anxiety about common-law authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Records of the Honorable Society of the King’S Inns Ireland
    Records of the Honorable Society of the King’s Inns Ireland GUIDE AND DESCRIPTIVE LIST 1989 – 2014 King’s Inns Library Henrietta Street Dublin 1 Introduction (i) N MANUSCRIPTS, HISTORICAL NOTES AND REFERENCES 265 N 1. Historical Notes on the Society of the King’s Inns 265 1.1 Bartholomew Thomas Duhigg, Librarian King’s Inns 265 N 2. Dublin Law Institute 1839-1842 267 N 3. Legal Manuscripts 268 3.1 Legal and Educational Manuscripts 268 3.1.1 Various Manuscripts 268 3.1.2 Lectures 269 3.1.3 David Power 270 3.2 Parliamentary Reports and Speeches 271 3.2.1 Parliamentary Reports 271 3.2.2 Parliamentary Speeches 272 3.2.3 Parliamentary Speeches AA 274 3.3 Treatises and Gilbert 275 3.3.1 Treatises 275 3.3.2 Sir Geoffrey Gilbert 277 3.4 Reports – King’s and Queen’s Bench 280 3.4.1 Reports – King’s/Queen’s Bench 280 3.4.2 Reports – King’s Bench Kingsbury Series 282 3.4.3 John Dillon’s Notebooks 284 3.5 Judges Notebooks 285 3.5.1 Judge Charles Burton Notebooks 285 3.5.2 Lord Viscount Lifford Notebooks 289 3.5.3 Judge Louis Perrin Notebooks 291 3.6 Thomas O’Hagan’s Notebooks 293 3.6.1 List of Magistrates and Newscuttings 293 3.6.2 The Right Honourable Justice O’Hagan Notebooks: 294 3.6.3 Lord Chancellor’s Notebooks 296 3.6.4 Lord Chancellor’s Notebooks 2 nd Term 300 3.7 Calendars and Precedents 301 3.7.1 Calendars 301 3.7.2 Abstracts of Journals 301 3.7.3 Tables 302 3.7.4 Precedents 303 3.8 Chancery 305 3.8.1 Chancery Cases in 3 Volumes 305 3.8.2 Rules of the Court of Chancery 305 3.8.3 Chancery Proceedings 306 3.8.4 Chancery Reports 307 3.9 Cases 309 3.9.1 Latin Notebooks 309 3.9.2 Notebooks on Estates 310 3.9.3 Notebooks on Cases 311 3.10 Legal Definitions/Dictionaries 314 3.10.1 Legal Definitions in 5 Volumes 314 3.10.2 Legal Definitions 315 N 4.
    [Show full text]
  • The English Legacy of the Second Amendment - History and Myth
    Hofstra Law Review Volume 46 | Issue 2 Article 8 12-1-2017 The nE glish Legacy of the Second Amendment - History and Myth Allen R. Kamp Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Kamp, Allen R. (2017) "The nE glish Legacy of the Second Amendment - History and Myth," Hofstra Law Review: Vol. 46 : Iss. 2 , Article 8. Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlr/vol46/iss2/8 This document is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hofstra Law Review by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Kamp: The English Legacy of the Second Amendment - History and Myth THE ENGLISH LEGACY OF THE SECOND AMENDMENT-HISTORY AND MYTH Allen R. Kamp* He said, "that he was the greatest Tyrant to the Neighbours in every other Instance, and would not suffer a Farmer to keep a Gun. .. I. THE PROBLEM-HELLER AND ENGLISH HISTORY According to the majority opinion of Justice Scalia in District of Columbia v. Heller,2 pre-Second Amendment adoption English history informs the Amendment's meaning. The majority opinion discusses the historical background after analyzing the language of the Amendment: Putting all of these textual elements together, we find that they guarantee the individual right to possess and carry weapons in case of confrontation. This meaning is strongly confirmed by the historical background of the Second Amendment. We look to this because it has always been widely understood that the Second Amendment, like the First and Fourth Amendments, codified a pre-existing right.
    [Show full text]
  • PLEASE NOTE This Is a Draft Paper Only and Should Not Be Cited Without
    PLEASE NOTE This is a draft paper only and should not be cited without the author’s express permission THE SHORT-TERM IMPACT OF THE >GLORIOUS REVOLUTION= ON THE ENGLISH JUDICIAL SYSTEM On February 14, 1689, The day after William and Mary were recognized by the Convention Parliament as King and Queen, the first members of their Privy Council were sworn in. And, during the following two to three weeks, all of the various high offices in the government and the royal household were filled. Most of the politically powerful posts went either to tories or to moderates. The tory Earl of Danby was made Lord President of the Council and another tory, the Earl of Nottingham was made Secretary of State for the Southern Department. The office of Lord Privy Seal was given to the Atrimming@ Marquess of Halifax, whom dedicated whigs had still not forgiven for his part in bringing about the disastrous defeat of the exclusion bill in the Lords= house eight years earlier. Charles Talbot, Earl of Shrewsbury, who was named Principal Secretary of State, can really only be described as tilting towards the whigs at this time. But, at the Admiralty and the Treasury, both of which were put into commission, in each case a whig stalwart was named as the first commissioner--Lord Mordaunt and Arthur Herbert respectivelyBand also in each case a number of other leading whigs were named to the commission as well.i Whig lawyers, on the whole, did rather better than their lay fellow-partisans. Devonshire lawyer and Inner Temple Bencher Henry Pollexfen was immediately appointed Attorney- General, and his cousin, Middle Templar George Treby, Solicitor General.
    [Show full text]
  • The Construction of the Scottish Military Identity
    RUINOUS PRIDE: THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE SCOTTISH MILITARY IDENTITY, 1745-1918 Calum Lister Matheson, B.A. Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS August 2011 APPROVED: Geoffrey Wawro, Major Professor Guy Chet, Committee Member Michael Leggiere, Committee Member Richard McCaslin, Chair of the Department of History James D. Meernik, Acting Dean of the Toulouse Graduate School Matheson, Calum Lister. Ruinous pride: The construction of the Scottish military identity, 1745-1918. Master of Arts (History), August 2011, 120 pp., bibliography, 138 titles. Following the failed Jacobite Rebellion of 1745-46 many Highlanders fought for the British Army in the Seven Years War and American Revolutionary War. Although these soldiers were primarily motivated by economic considerations, their experiences were romanticized after Waterloo and helped to create a new, unified Scottish martial identity. This militaristic narrative, reinforced throughout the nineteenth century, explains why Scots fought and died in disproportionately large numbers during the First World War. Copyright 2011 by Calum Lister Matheson ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CHAPTER I: THE HIGHLAND WARRIOR MYTH ........................................................... 1 CHAPTER II: EIGHTEENTH CENTURY: THE BUTCHER‘S BILL ................................ 10 CHAPTER III: NINETEENTH CENTURY: THE THIN RED STREAK ............................ 44 CHAPTER IV: FIRST WORLD WAR: CULLODEN ON THE SOMME .......................... 68 CHAPTER V: THE GREAT WAR AND SCOTTISH MEMORY ................................... 102 BIBLIOGRAPHY ......................................................................................................... 112 iii CHAPTER I THE HIGHLAND WARRIOR MYTH Looking back over nearly a century, it is tempting to see the First World War as Britain‘s Armageddon. The tranquil peace of the Edwardian age was shattered as armies all over Europe marched into years of hellish destruction.
    [Show full text]
  • Jacobite Risings and the Union of 1707
    Portland State University PDXScholar Young Historians Conference Young Historians Conference 2015 Apr 28th, 1:00 PM - 2:15 PM Inevitable Rebellion: Jacobite Risings and the Union of 1707 Lindsay E. Swanson St. Mary’s Academy Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/younghistorians Part of the European History Commons, and the Social History Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Swanson, Lindsay E., "Inevitable Rebellion: Jacobite Risings and the Union of 1707" (2015). Young Historians Conference. 11. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/younghistorians/2015/oralpres/11 This Event is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Young Historians Conference by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Inevitable Rebellion: The Jacobite Risings and the Union of 1707 Lindsay Swanson PSU HST 102 Mr. Vannelli December 17, 2014 Swanson 2 Resistance, historically, has been an inevitable facet of empire-building. Despite centuries of practice in the art of empire creation and destruction, no power has been able to develop a structure durable enough to overcome all threats, both externally and internally. The British Empire is no exception. By the 18th century, England found itself with several nations opposing its expansion, the most notable among them Spain and France. Despite this enmity, England was determined to extend its reach, fixing its gaze on Scotland with the hopes of merging the two nations. This idea was not a new one. English Parliament tried multiple times throughout the 17th century to convince the Scottish government to consider uniting the two countries, effectively transforming them into a superpower to rival any other currently in existence.
    [Show full text]
  • A Pilgrimage Through English History and Culture (F-L)
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Faculty Publications 2009-05-01 A Pilgrimage Through English History and Culture (F-L) Gary P. Gillum [email protected] Susan Wheelwright O'Connor Alexa Hysi Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/facpub Part of the English Language and Literature Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Gillum, Gary P.; O'Connor, Susan Wheelwright; and Hysi, Alexa, "A Pilgrimage Through English History and Culture (F-L)" (2009). Faculty Publications. 12. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/facpub/12 This Other is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. 833 FAIRFAX, JOHN, 1623-1700. Rare 922.542 St62f 1681 Presbýteros diples times axios, or, The true dignity of St. Paul's elder, exemplified in the life of that reverend, holy, zealous, and faithful servant, and minister of Jesus Christ Mr. Owne Stockton ... : with a collection of his observations, experiences and evidences recorded by his own hand : to which is added his funeral sermon / by John Fairfax. London : Printed by H.H. for Tho. Parkhurst at the Sign of the Bible and Three Crowns, at the lower end of Cheapside, 1681. Description: [12], 196, [20] p. ; 15 cm. References: Wing F 129. Subjects: Stockton, Owen, 1630-1680. Notes: Title enclosed within double line rule border. "Mors Triumphata; or The Saints Victory over Death; Opened in a Funeral Sermon ... " has special title page. 834 FAIRFAX, THOMAS FAIRFAX, Baron, 1612-1671.
    [Show full text]
  • Earles of Dorsetshire
    EARLES OF ENGLAND—DORSETSHIRE 29 CHAPTER FOUR. THE EARLES OF DORSETSHIRE. If we are right in our identification of John Erie, of Ashburton, and our London author is correct in his statements, we shall have plain sailing in giving the genealogy of the Dorsetshire branch. This begins with Walter Erie, of Charborough, and the descent is as fol­ lows: N—FOURTEENTH GENERATION. CHILDREN OF JOHN ERLE (M 2), OF CULHAMPTON, DEVONSHIRE, d. 1508, son of John Erie (L 2), of Ashburton, d. 1484, and Margaret de Sondes: N 1) JOHN ERLE, of Culhampton, married Thomasine Beare, of County Somerset. 0—FIFTEENTH GENERATION. CHILDREN OF JOHN ERLE (N 1), OF CULHAMPTON, AND THOMASINE BEARE: O 1) WALTER ERLE, of Charborough, County Dorset; d. 1581; married Mary, daughter and co-heir of Richard Wykes, of Binden and Charborough; founder of the Dor­ setshire branch. A quaint bit of old-time history is here transcribed from Pole's "Collections for Devon:" "Bindon, in Axmouth, was sometime the dwelling of Nicholas Bach, and by him sold in Kinge Henry 4 tyme unto Roger Wike; it contynewed in the famyly, and the last of them, Richard Wike, left it unto his foure daughters, wief of Antony Giffard, Alis (Alice), wief of Hugh Barry, wief of Mark Hays, and Mary, wief of Walter Erie, which bought Giffard's part, and so the moytye (half) is descended unto Sir Walter Earle, sonne of , and Dorothie, his wief, daughter of William Pole, of Shute, Esq. Theire hath the said Sir Walter Erie his howse, with fayre demesnes thereunto belonginge, with the parsonage impropriat." There is a conflict of authorities just here which we are not able to determine.
    [Show full text]
  • Mantuan Roundel, Venus, Mars, Cupid and Vulcan
    1 RCEWA – Mantuan Roundel, Venus, Mars, Cupid and Vulcan Statement of the Expert Adviser to the Secretary of State that the roundel meets Waverley criteria two and three. Further Information The ‘Applicant’s statement’ and the ‘Note of Case History’ are available on the Arts Council Website: www.artscouncil.org.uk/reviewing-committee-case-hearings Please note that images and appendices referenced are not reproduced. 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Brief Description of item A roundel depicting Venus, Mars, Cupid and Vulcan Partially gilded and silvered bronze with a deep brown/black patina Dia. 42 cm Italian, Mantuan or possibly Paduan, c.1480-1500 Condition: Other than areas of wear on the gilded rim, and minor nicks and dents over the surface, the bronze is in very good condition. The reverse retains traces of investment material and has some pale blue- green corrosion overall in the recesses; cracks due to casting flaws have been expertly repaired. The roundel has undergone conservation to remove dirt, old wax and some very small copper 1 sulphate-based pustules. Provenance: Almost certainly owned by George Treby III (c.1726-1761), and then by descent within the Treby family of Plympton, Devon until 2003; sold at Christie’s London, Important European Furniture, Sculpture and Tapestries, Thursday 11 December 2003, lot 20; then by descent until 2019; purchased by current owner Selected Sources and Literature (in chronological order): Christie’s, London, Important European Furniture, Sculpture and Tapestries, Thursday 11 December 2003, lot 20 (see Appendix 1) Export of Works of Art of Cultural Interest 2004-05, London 2005, pp.15-16 (case 1) Denise Allen in Eleanora Luciano, et al, Antico.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Dean Junior Stephen 0952757 Ethesis
    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ Firearms, Legitimacy and Power in Eighteenth-Century Ireland Dean Junior, Stephen Duane Awarding institution: King's College London The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 24. Sep. 2021 Firearms, Legitimacy and Power in Eighteenth-Century Ireland Stephen Duane Dean Junior History Department King’s College London Abstract Controlling access to firearms was one of the few truly successful Anglo-Irish policies of the eighteenth century and a founding tenant of the penal laws.
    [Show full text]