1 Genomic Architecture of Artificially and Sexually Selected Traits in a Wild Cervid
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/841528; this version posted December 14, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Genomic architecture of artificially and sexually selected traits in a wild cervid 2 3 Running title: Genomic basis of sexually selected traits 4 5 S. J. Anderson1*, S. D. Côté 2, J. H. Richard2, A. B. A. Shafer1,3* 6 7 1 Environmental and Life Sciences Graduate Program, Trent University, K9J 7B8 8 Peterborough, Canada. 9 10 2 Département de biologie, Centre d’études nordiques & Chaire de recherche 11 industrielle CRSNG en aménagement intégré des ressources de l'île d'Anticosti, 12 Université Laval, G1V 0A6, Québec, QC, Canada 13 14 3 Forensics Department, Trent University, K9J 7B8 Peterborough, Canada. 15 16 * Corresponding authors: [email protected], [email protected] 17 18 19 20 21 Keywords 22 Quantitative traits, population genetics, gene enrichment, polygenic traits 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/841528; this version posted December 14, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 23 Abstract 24 Characterization of the genomic architecture of fitness-related traits such as body 25 size and male ornamentation in mammals provides tools for conservation and 26 management: as both indicators of quality and health, these traits are often subject to 27 sexual and artificial selective pressures. Here we performed high-depth whole genome 28 re-sequencing on pools of individuals representing the phenotypic extremes in our study 29 system for antler and body size in white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). Samples 30 were selected from a tissue repository containing phenotypic data for 4,466 male white- 31 tailed deer from Anticosti Island, Quebec, with four pools representing the extreme 32 phenotypes for antler and body size in the population, after controlling for age. Our 33 results revealed a largely panmictic population, but detected highly diverged windows 34 between pools for both traits with high shifts in allele frequency (mean allele frequency 35 difference of 14% for and 13% for antler and body SNPs in outlier windows). These 36 regions often contained putative genes of small-to-moderate effect consistent with a 37 polygenic model of quantitative traits. Genes in outlier antler windows had known direct 38 or indirect effects on growth and pathogen defence, while body genes, overall GO 39 terms, and transposable element analyses were more varied and nuanced. Through 40 qPCR analysis we validated both a body and antler gene. Overall, this study revealed 41 the polygenic nature of both antler morphology and body size in free-ranging white- 42 tailed deer and identified target loci for additional analyses. 2 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/841528; this version posted December 14, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 43 Introduction 44 Quantifying the genomic architecture underlying phenotypes in natural populations 45 provides insights into the evolution of quantitative traits (Stinchcombe & Hoekstra, 46 2008). Some quantitative traits are correlated with metrics of fitness, and as such are 47 particularly important because they might directly influence population viability (Kardos 48 & Shafer, 2018). This relationship between genomic architecture and quantitative traits, 49 however, is not easy to empirically identify (Barghi et al., 2020), and often has unclear 50 and unpredictable responses to selection (Bünger et al., 2005). Outside of a few traits in 51 well studied systems such as horn morphology in Soay sheep (Johnston et al., 2011, 52 2013) and migration timing in Pacific salmon (Prince et al., 2017), there are few studies 53 that have successfully identified quantitative trait loci (QTL) in wild vertebrate 54 populations with effects on fitness-related traits. 55 Genome-wide association scans (GWAS) have the potential to identify links 56 between genomic regions and fitness relevant traits that can directly inform 57 management and have become more prominent in non-model organisms (Ellegren 58 2014; Santure & Grant 2018). The variations of expressed phenotypes that are 59 observed in wild populations are influenced by demographic, environmental and 60 epigenetic factors (Ellegren & Sheldon 2008), which leads to difficulties when trying to 61 quantify the direct influence of genetic polymorphisms, and more generally differentiate 62 the effects of drift from selection (Kardos & Shafer 2018). Most traits also appear to be 63 composed of many genes of small effect, and heritability for complex traits are often 64 modulated by genes outside of core pathways and coding regions (Robinson et al., 65 2013; Santure et al., 2013; Boyle et al., 2017; Barghi et al. 2020). Population genetic 3 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/841528; this version posted December 14, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 66 modeling allows disentangling phenotypic plasticity and responses to environmental 67 change, while expanding our understanding of the evolutionary processes in wild 68 populations (Santure & Grant 2018). Where traits directly linked to reproductive success 69 are also those humans target via harvesting (Coltman et al., 2003; Kuparinen & Festa- 70 Bianchet, 2017), there is a need to understand the genomic architecture to predict 71 evolutionary consequences (Kardos & Luikart, 2015), considering that the two modes of 72 selection (natural and artificial) might not always act in concert, and can vary spatially 73 and temporally (Edeline et al. 2007). 74 For traits relevant to fitness, including those under sexual selection, we might 75 expect directional selection towards the dominant or desired phenotype. In long term 76 studies of wild populations, however, there is often a relatively high degree of observed 77 genetic variation underlying sexually selected traits (Johnston et al., 2013; Berenos et 78 al., 2015; Malenfant et al., 2018), with the proposed mechanism for this genetic 79 variation being balancing selection (Mank, 2017; but see Kruuk et al. 2007). For 80 example, Johnston et al. (2013) showed that variation is maintained at a single large 81 effect locus through a trade-off between observed higher reproductive success for large 82 horns and increased survival for smaller horns in Soay sheep. These trade-offs, 83 creating signatures consistent with balancing selection, are also observed in cases 84 where social dominance structures exist as a result of male-male competition for female 85 mate acquisition, where alternative mating strategies have been suggested as a means 86 for younger or subordinate males to achieve greater mating success (Foley et al., 87 2015). 4 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/841528; this version posted December 14, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 88 Emerging approaches to investigate the genomic architecture of complex 89 phenotypes 90 The methodological approach of analyzing extreme phenotypes seeks to sample 91 individuals representing the extreme ends of the spectrum for any observable 92 phenotype, instead of randomly sampling individuals from the entire distribution (Perez- 93 Gracia et al., 2002; Li et al., 2011; Emond et al., 2012; Barnett et al., 2013; Gurwitz & 94 McLeod, 2013; Kardos et al., 2016). Pooled sequencing (pool-seq) uses the 95 resequencing of pooled DNA from individuals within a population and is a cost-effective 96 alternative to the whole genome sequencing of every individual (Anand et al., 2016) with 97 lower coverage options emerging (Tilk et al. 2019). Individual identity is lost through the 98 pooling of DNA, but the resulting allelic frequencies are representative of the population 99 and can be used to conduct standard population genomic analyses, including outlier 100 detection (Schlötterer et al., 2014). Pool-seq methods have been applied with the 101 purposes of identifying genes of moderate-to-large effect loci in a variety of taxa 102 including colour morphs in butterflies and birds, abdominal pigmentation in Drosophila, 103 and horn size of wild Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep (Kardos et al, 2015; Endler et al., 104 2017; Neethiraj et al., 2017). 105 Here, we explored the genic basis for phenotypic variation by sampling the 106 extreme phenotypes in a non-model big game species, the white-tailed deer 107 (Odocoileus virginianus, WTD). Two traits are of particular interest in WTD; body size 108 and antler size, which have a degree of observable variation (Hewitt 2011) and are 109 connected to individual reproductive success (DeYoung et al., 2009; Newbolt et al., 110 2016; Jones et al., 2018). Heritability for antler and body measurements are moderate 5 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/841528; this version posted December 14, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 111 to high for antler features and body size (Michel et al., 2016; Williams et al., 1994; 112 Jamieson et al., 2020).