California SHEEP Production

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

California SHEEP Production mmmmi. W3MMM::MSMM0Mm&t.: V E . f :-jmc **? ' <* --• -<l J < ^W^iSS. S*#s California . V : '<K : ' " : :,: :: ^'" * " . .^":" -^'^ ' : '"V :i Jt.'&M -^::">:i:>-M^'^iiS W if .:., '.^:S WILLIAM C. WEIR - HIUBIN AIM CALIFORNI Experimen E x t e Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2012 with funding from University of California, Davis Libraries http://archive.org/details/californiasheepp16weir California SHEEP Production WILLIAM C. WEIR - REUBEN ALBAUGH UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE Agricultural Experiment Station and Extension Service LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS CONTENTS Distribution, breeding, and selection 1 History of their introduction into the state 1 Sheep population 2 Present distribution in the state 2 The four general groups 4 Breeding replacement ewes How to select breeding stock 8 Keeping records of performance 10 Sheep raising as a business 13 The pros and cons 13 Five types of sheep operations 13 How to start a sheep enterprise 14 Handling sheep 15 Predator and dog control 15 Marketing lambs 16 Production costs 16 Sheep prices compared to cattle prices 19 Equipment for sheep production 19 Develop an over-all plan 19 List of available plans 19 The loading chute 19 Scales 20 The feed yard 20 Sheep dogs 24 Feeding sheep in California 25 Requirements 25 Total feed 25 Digestible protein 25 Total digestible nutrients 28 Minerals 28 Vitamins 30 Composition of feeds 36 Supplemental feeding 36 Calendar of operations 39 Breeding season 39 Shearing, branding, and hoof-trimming 42 Care of ewes from breeding to lambing 44 Care of the ewe at lambing time 45 Care of ewes after lambing 47 Care of lambs 47 Culling the breeding ewes 54 Water 54 Shade " 54 Marketing 55 Fattening feeder lambs 56 Feeding lambs on pasture as a soiling crop 58 Stilbestrol implants 58 Reference reading 59 ,r - &!£r£*. ' --v. ." * * Sift- HEPHERDING is one of the oldest professions known to man- kind. Dating back to biblical times, the care of sheep is often used in song and story as a symbol of the simple life. But the sheep business as it exists today in California is a complex enterprise. This manual will acquaint you with the principal aspects of sheep production—the breeds raised in the state; sheep as a business; equipment you will need; feeding sheep; and a cal- endar of operations for a typical year. There is also a list of reference books, in case you wish to read further on any particular phase of sheep raising. This manual replaces Extension Circular 49. THE AUTHORS: William C. Weir is Assistant Professor of Animal Husbandry and Assistant Animal Husbandman in the Experiment Station, Davis; Reuben Albaugh is Extension Animal Husbandman, University of California, Davis. OCTOBER, 1954 California SHEEP Production WILLIAM C. WEIR - REUBEN ALBAUGH DISTRIBUTION, BREEDING, and SELECTION for wool production or for meat A brief history of their introduction With the discovery of gold in Cali- into the state fornia in 1848 and the influx of fortune- Domestic sheep were first introduced seekers from all parts of the country, into California in 1769. They were there was a great demand for fresh meat. brought here by the Franciscan fathers, Lambs brought $12 and wethers $15 per who were then establishing their chain of head. Large numbers of sheep were missions along El Camino Real. These slaughtered, and by 1850 only 17,514 sheep, of Spanish origin, were low-grade, head of sheep remained—less than 1 per of the coarse-wool type. They were used cent of the number roaming the ranges by the mission fathers as a teaching aid of California 25 years before. During the in missionary work with the natives. The period of 1852-1857, because of the de- men were taught the care and manage- mand for meat 551,000 sheep were im- ment of the flocks, and the women ported into California by the trail route learned the art of making clothing from from New Mexico. the wool. Sheep also supplied food and Following the gold-rush days many fiber to the colonists. enterprising and progressive sheepmen In 1825 about one million head of began to improve their flocks. They im- sheep were kept by the seventeen mis- ported purebred sheep from Vermont, sions, and a like number were owned by New York, Ohio, and Pennsylvania. ranchers. This indicates that in the early Spanish Merinos were first brought to days the coastal district of California California by Curtis and McConnell of was a great sheep-producing region. Be- Sacramento. Besides importations from sides clothing and blankets made by the other states, large numbers of high- women of the mission, large numbers of priced sheep were brought into Cali- pelts and quantities of tallow processed fornia from Australia. It is reported that and sold to trading ships were economi- during the period of 1856-1860 as many cally important. as 200 purebred sheep were exhibited at During the period of 1832-1848 the fairs as a single exhibit. disposal of livestock was placed in the The first California sheep and wool hands of Government officers. By their growers association was organized on ruling much of the livestock property was September 24, 1860, its purpose being to sold to interests outside the missions. foster and promote sheep breeding and [i] wool growing in all its branches and to Sheep population in take steps to prevent a monopoly on the California is now on wool market of the state. The California the increase Woolgrowers Association is the state's Sheep numbers in the state from 1920 oldest agricultural organization. to 1944 fluctuated from slightly over Sheep numbers increased rapidly from 2,000,000 head to about 3,500,000 head, 1860 to 1876. Over 6 million head were the peak year coming in 1934. From reported in the state in producing 1876, a 1944 to 1950 the numbers showed a wool clip of 56,550,970 pounds. During gradual decrease, reaching a low point the period 1880-1890 there was a grad- in 1950 of only 1,756,000; but by the ual decrease in sheep numbers, due beginning of 1954 there were again mainly to the low price of wool the and 2,034,000 sheep in California. competition for grazing lands from other Several factors are responsible for the agricultural industries. According to E. decline from the 1934 peak of produc- J. Wickson in a book entitled "Rural tion. Lands formerly used for sheep have California," over 225,000 sheep were gone into other crops. More profit has trailed eastward in 1881. During the been realized from other enterprises. nineties sheep numbers still continued to Skilled sheep labor has been difficult to decline, and the farm value reached an secure. Wool prices have been relatively all-time low of $1.50 per head. low. Grazing allotments have been re- In the decade 1900-1910 conditions duced. Predatory animals and uncon- for raising sheep remained adverse. In trolled dogs have been a problem. There 1906 the U.S.D.A. placed a grazing fee has been increased competition by wild- on domestic livestock grazed on the Na- life, especially deer, for range forage. tional Forests. Public policy appeared to Brush encroachment has reduced the be against the wool producer. forage available to sheep in the range New interest was awakened in mutton area. sheep with the outbreak of the World It is generally agreed that if sheep War in 1914, and sheep values increased. numbers are to be materially increased In spite of this, during 1914- the period more farm flocks must be established. 1920 numbers did not expand. After the war a national depression was experi- How the present sheep enced, and many believe that the sheep population is distributed business withstood this economic disor- Before entering the sheep-production der better than did some other industries. business, make a careful study of your During these different periods in the area to determine if it is suitable for sheep industry, a gradual change took such an enterprise. Although sheep rais- place in breeding, feeding, management, ing is carried on in most sections of the and marketing. Four- to six-months-old state, the largest population is found in milk-fat lambs of good breeding replaced the great interior valleys—Sacramento the aged wether, which had been kept and San Joaquin. mainly for its wool. With the aid of On January 1, 1953, the Sacramento scientific data sheepmen began selective Valley area had 671,000 sheep. The San breeding for wool and lamb production. Joaquin Valley section reported the same Although the American people do not year 321,500 head. favor mutton, they like lamb. The de- Commercial and farm flocks make up mand for lambs is such that about 65 per the largest percentage of sheep popula- cent of the sheepman's income in Cali- tion in California. However, in some fornia is from this source, while 35 per areas the purebred business is highly cent is from wool. developed. 12] WHERE SHEEP ARE RAISED IN CALIFORNIA \" f • • • SHEEP DISTRIBUTION IN CALIFORNIA 1 • • 1953 J • * * • • • • • *j • • represents approximately 10,000 head "^ + represents approximately 5,000 head \ • MTvi •" represents less than 5,000 head 1 • •••>|V.W( •• / • •^ r +V / * * • ) V • vvvL • • • • • • • THE TEN LEADING COUNTIES IN 1953: Glenn 150,300 Kern 116,700 Humboldt 140,500 Colusa 98,000 Mendocino 133,000 Tehama 88,600 Sonoma 134,300 Fresno 61,100 Solano 130,800 Yolo 61,000 [3] — Most breeds fall into four general groups These are fine wools, long wools, medium wool dual-purpose, and medium wool mutton breeds. Instead of discus- sing each breed in detail, this section gives the principal use, advantages, and disadvantages of each group.
Recommended publications
  • Nova Scotia Veterinary Medical Association Council
    G^r? NOVA SCOTIAVETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION Registrar's Office 15 Cobequid Road, Lower Sackvllle, NS B4C 2M9 Phone: (902) 865-1876 Fax: (902) 865-2001 E-mail: [email protected] September 24, 2018 Dear Chair, and committee members, My name is Dr Melissa Burgoyne. I am a small animal veterinarian and clinic owner in Lower Sackville, Nova Scotia. I am currently serving my 6th year as a member of the NSVMA Council and currently, I am the past president on the Nova Scotia Veterinary Medical Association Council. I am writing today to express our support of Bill 27 and what it represents to support and advocate for those that cannot do so for themselves. As veterinarians, we all went into veterinary medicine because we want to.help animals, prevent and alleviate suffering. We want to reassure the public that veterinarians are humane professionals who are committed to doing what is best for animals, rather than being motivated by financial reasons. We have Dr. Martell-Moran's paper (see attached) related to declawing, which shows that there are significant and negative effects on behavior, as well as chronic pain. His conclusions indicate that feline declaw which is the removal of the distal phalanx, not just the nail, is associated with a significant increase in the odds of adverse behaviors such as biting, aggression, inappropriate elimination and back pain. The CVMA, AAFP, AVMA and Cat Healthy all oppose this procedure. The Cat Fancier's Association decried it 6 years ago. Asfor the other medically unnecessary cosmetic surgeries, I offer the following based on the Mills article.
    [Show full text]
  • Tail Docking in Dogs: Historical Precedence and Modern Views by Jill Kessler Copyright 2012
    Tail Docking in Dogs: Historical Precedence and Modern Views By Jill Kessler Copyright 2012 As everyone gathered in the kitchen to prepare for an extended family dinner, Mother took a large ham and cut off a big piece of the end and put it in another smaller pan to cook. As she prepared the two baking dishes, one of the grandchildren asked, “Grandma, why do you cut off part of the ham?” “Well, thatʼs the way I learned how to do it from my Mom, your great grandmother.” One of the Aunts says, “I thought it was because Dad liked to have his own separate piece.” An Uncle says “I thought it was because it made the meat more tender.” A different Aunt chimes in, “Mom said it was just the way it was always done.” Curious, they decide to ask Great Grandmother the reason why the end of the ham was separated. ************************************* History and Veterinary Standing Tail docking (amputation of the tail) has been done on dogs for hundreds of years. A variety of justifications have been offered, usually in accordance to the historical tasks of the breed. For instance, in hunting dogs, conventional wisdom said it was to prevent injury in the field from nettles, burrs or sticks; in herding or bull-baiting dogs it was thought to help avoid injury from large livestock. In truth, there are two primary historical reasons for docking. For our mastiff-based working dogs that accompanied the ancient Romans, it was believed that tail docking and tongue clipping would ward off rabies.i Obviously, this was before modern bacteriology and vaccines, when rabies was still a feared, lethal zoonotic disease that raced through cities and countrysides, infecting all mammals encountered in its path.
    [Show full text]
  • Judging Dairy Cattle
    Judging Dairy Cattle The primary function of the dairy cow is the economical production of milk. It has been proven that quality type or form is directly related to function. In other words, a dairy cow with good quality type has the potential to efficiently and economically produce milk. Your task, as a producer of dairy cows, is to breed good quality cows. In this leaflet we will work towards these objectives to help you accomplish your task. Learn the desirable points of conformation in a quality dairy cow and heifer. Show you how to determine if a particular animal possesses these desirable points. The first step is to learn the parts of the dairy animal. Parts of the Dairy Cow Judging the Dairy Cow 4-H Manitoba 2019 Once you know the parts of the body, the next step to becoming a successful dairy judge is to learn what the ideal animal looks like. In this section, we will work through the parts of a dairy cow and learn the desirable and undesirable characteristics. Holstein Canada has developed a scorecard which places relative emphasis on the six areas of importance in the dairy cow. This scorecard is used by all dairy breeds in Canada. The Holstein Cow Scorecard uses these six areas: 1. Frame / Capacity 2. Rump 3. Feet and Legs 4. Mammary System 5. Dairy Character When you judge, do not assign numerical scores. Use the card for relative emphasis only. When cows are classified by the official breed classifiers, classifications and absolute scores are assigned. 2 HOLSTEIN COW SCORE CARD 18 1.
    [Show full text]
  • From Birth to Colostrum: Early Steps Leading to Lamb Survival Raymond Nowak, Pascal Poindron
    From birth to colostrum: early steps leading to lamb survival Raymond Nowak, Pascal Poindron To cite this version: Raymond Nowak, Pascal Poindron. From birth to colostrum: early steps leading to lamb survival. Reproduction Nutrition Development, EDP Sciences, 2006, 46 (4), pp.431-446. 10.1051/rnd:2006023. hal-00900627 HAL Id: hal-00900627 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00900627 Submitted on 1 Jan 2006 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 46 (2006) 431–446 431 c INRA, EDP Sciences, 2006 DOI: 10.1051/rnd:2006023 Review From birth to colostrum: early steps leading to lamb survival Raymond N*, Pascal P Laboratoire de Comportements, Neurobiologie et Adaptation, UMR 6175 CNRS-INRA-Université François Rabelais-Haras Nationaux, Unité de Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements, INRA, 37380 Nouzilly, France Abstract – New-born lambs have limited energy reserves and need a rapid access to colostrum to maintain homeothermy and survive. In addition to energy, colostrum provides immunoglobulins which ensure passive systemic immunity. Therefore, getting early access to the udder is essential for the neonate. The results from the literature reviewed here highlight the importance of the birth site as the location where the mutual bonding between the mother and her young takes place.
    [Show full text]
  • Udder Morphology, Milk Production and Udder Health in Small Ruminants
    J. Vrdoljak et al.: Udder morphology, milk production and udder health in small ruminants, et al.: Udder morphology, J. Vrdoljak REVIEW | UDK: 636.37 | DoI: 10.15567/mljekarstvo.2020.0201 REcEIVED: 17.10.2019. | AccEptED: 20.03.2020. Udder morphology, milk production and udder health in small ruminants Josip Vrdoljak1, Zvonimir Prpić 2*, Dubravka Samaržija 3, Ivan Vnučec 2, Miljenko Konjačić 2, Nikolina Kelava Ugarković 2 1Pleter usluge d.o.o., Čerinina 23, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia 2University of Zagreb, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Animal Science and Technology, Svetošimunska cesta 25, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia 3University of Zagreb, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Dairy Science, Svetošimunska cesta 25, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia *Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Mljekarstvo In recent years there has been an increasing trend in research of sheep and goat udder morphology, not only from the view of its suitability for machine milking, but also in terms of milk yield and mam- 70 (2), 75-84 (2020) mary gland health. More precisely, herds consisting of high-yielding sheep and goats as a result of long-term and one-sided selection to increase milk yield, have been characterised by distortion of the udder morphology caused by increasing the pressure of udder weight on its suspensory system. Along with the deteriorated milking traits, which is negatively reflected on the udder health, some udder mor- phology traits are often emphasized as factor of production longevity of dairy sheep and goats. Since the intention of farmers and breeders nowadays is to increase the milk yield of sheep and goats while maintaining desirable udder morphology and udder health, the aim of this paper is to give a detailed overview of the current knowledge about the relationship of morphological udder traits with milk yield, and the health of the mammary gland of sheep and goats.
    [Show full text]
  • The Structure of the Cow's Udder
    UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION BULLETIN 344 The Structure of the Cow's Udder C. W. T u RN ER COLUMBIA, MISSOURI JANUARY, 1935 UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE Agricultural Experiment Station EXECUTIVE BOARD OF CURATORS.-MERCER ARNOLD, joplin; H. J. BLANTON. Pario: GEORGE C. WILLSON, St. Louio STATION STAFF, JANUARY, 1935 WALTER WILLIAMS, L.L. D., President FREDERICK A. MIDDLEBUSH, Ph. D ., Acting President F B . MUMFORD, M S~ D. Agr., Director S. B. SHIRKY, A.M., Asst. to Director MISS ELLA PAHMEIER, Secretary AGRICULTURAL CHEMISTRY E. MARION BROWN, A.M.* A. G. HoGAN, Ph.D. Mtss CLARA FuHR, M.S.* L. D. HAIGH, Ph.D. E. W. CowAN, A.M. HOME ECONOMICS J.UTHitP. R. RICHARDSON, Ph.D. U. S. AsHwOJ.TH. Ph.D MABEL CAMPBELL, A.M. A.M. ]ESSIE ALICE CLINE, A.M. S. R. JoHNSON, ADELLA EPPEL GINTER, M.S. HELEN BERESFORD, B.S. AGRICULTtlRAL ECONOMICS BERTHA BtSBI!Y, Ph.D. 0. R. JoHNsoN, A.M ]ESSIE v. COLES, Ph.D. BEN H. FRA>lE, A.M. BERTHA K. WHIPPLE, M.S F. L. THOl<SEN, Ph.D c. H. HAl<llAil, Ph.D. HORTICULTURE AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING T. J. TALBI!kT, A.M. J. C. WooLEY, M .S. A. E. MuRNEEJ<, Ph.D. MAcJ: M. JoNES. M.S. H. G. SwARTWOUT, A.M. G. W. GILES, B.S. in A. E. GEO. CARL VINSON, Ph.D. FRAN!t Holi.SFALL, ]R., A.M. ANIMAL HUSBANDRY R. A. ScRilOEDER, 11.S. in Agr. GEOilGI! E. SMITH, B S. in Agr. E.
    [Show full text]
  • Internet Research Cheetahs Page of 1
    Internet Research Cheetahs CHEETAHS http://animals.nationalgeographic.com/animals/mammals/cheetah/ The cheetah is the world's fastest land mammal. With acceleration that would leave most automobiles in the dust, a cheetah can go from 0 to 60 miles (96 kilometers) an hour in only three seconds. These big cats are quite nimble at high speed and can make quick and sudden turns in pursuit of prey. Before unleashing their speed, cheetahs use exceptionally keen eyesight to scan their grassland environment for signs of prey—especially antelope and hares. This big cat is a daylight hunter that benefits from stealthy movement and a distinctive spotted coat that allows it to blend easily into high, dry grasses. When the moment is right a cheetah will sprint after its quarry and attempt to knock it down. Such chases cost the hunter a tremendous amount of energy and are usually over in less than a minute. If successful, the cheetah will often drag its kill to a shady hiding place to protect it from opportunistic animals that sometimes steal a kill before the cheetah can eat. Cheetahs need only drink once every three to four days. Female cheetahs typically have a litter of three cubs and live with them for one and a half to two years. Young cubs spend their first year learning from their mother and practicing hunting techniques with playful games. Male cheetahs live alone or in small groups, often with their littermates. Most wild cheetahs are found in eastern and southwestern Africa. Perhaps only 7,000 to 10,000 of these big cats remain, and those are under pressure as the wide-open grasslands they favor are disappearing at the hands of human settlers.
    [Show full text]
  • Mastitis Control Programs Bovine Mastitis and Milking Management J
    AS1129 (Revised) Mastitis Control Programs Bovine Mastitis and Milking Management J. W. Schroeder, Extension Dairy Specialist astitis complex; no simple solutions are Mavailable for its control. Some aspects are well- understood and documented in the scientific literature. Others are controversial, and opinions often are presented as facts. The information and interpretations presented here represent the best judgments accepted by the National Mastitis Council. To simplify understanding of mastitis, you’ll need to consider that three major factors are involved in this Figure 1 disease: the microorganisms that cause it, the cow as host and the environment, which Cows contract udder infection to reduce this exposure and can influence the cow and the at different ages and stages of enhance resistance to udder microorganisms. (Figure 1) the lactation cycle. Cows also disease. More than 100 different vary in their ability to overcome Practical measures are microorganisms can cause an infection once it has been available to maintain common mastitis, and these vary greatly established. Therefore, the forms of mastitis at relatively in the route by which they reach cow plays an active role in the low and acceptable levels in the cow and the nature of the development of mastitis. the majority of herds. While disease they cause. The cows’ environment continued research is needed to influences the numbers and control the less common forms types of bacteria they are of intramammary infection, exposed to and their ability to herd problems are often the resist these microorganisms. result of failure to apply the However, through appropriate proven mastitis-control practices management practices, the consistently and to consider all North Dakota State University environment can be controlled aspects of the disease problem.
    [Show full text]
  • Pathogenesis of Bovine Alphaherpesvirus 2 in Calves Following Different Routes of Inoculation1 Bruna P
    Pesq. Vet. Bras. 40(5):360-367, May 2020 DOI: 10.1590/1678-5150-PVB-6588 Original Article Livestock Diseases ISSN 0100-736X (Print) ISSN 1678-5150 (Online) PVB-6588 LD Pathogenesis of Bovine alphaherpesvirus 2 in calves following different routes of inoculation1 Bruna P. Amaral2,3, José C. Jardim4 , Juliana F. Cargnelutti3,5, Mathias Martins6,7 , Rudi Weiblen2,3 and Eduardo F. Flores2,3* ABSTRACT.-Amaral B.P., Jardim J.C., Cargnelutti J.F., Martins M., Weiblen R. & Flores E.F. 2020. Pathogenesis of Bovine alphaherpesvirus 2 in calves inoculated by different routes. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira 40(5):360-367. Setor de Virologia, Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Av. Roraima 1000, Rua Z, Prédio 63A, Santa Maria, RS 97105-900, Brazil. E-mail: Título Original Bovine alphaherpesvirus 2 (BoHV-2) is the agent of herpetic mammilitis (BHM), a cutaneous and self-limiting disease affecting the udder [email protected] teats of cows. The pathogenesis of BoHV-2 is pourly understood, hampering the development of therapeutic drugs, vaccines [Título traduzido]. and other control measures. This study investigated the pathogenesis of BoHV-2 in calves after inoculation through different routes. Three- to four-months seronegative calves were 7 -1 inoculated with BoHV-2 (10 TCID50.mL ) intramuscular (IM, n=4), intravenous (IV, n=4) Autores and serological monitoring. Calves inoculated by the IV route presented as light increase orin bodytransdermal temperature (TD) afterbetween mild days scarification 6 to 9 post-inoculation (n=4) and submitted (pi). Virus to virological, inoculation clinical by the by hyperemia, small vesicles, mild exudation and scab formation, between days 2 and 8pi.
    [Show full text]
  • State Legislative Update January 2020
    State Legislative Update January 2020 This State Legislative Update includes select summaries of bills and regulations tracked by the AVMA Division of State Advocacy in January 2020. For more information on bills and regulations, please see our full listing or contact AVMA. Numerous states consider bills to prohibit procedures Several states are considering prohibitions on declawing, devocalization, ear cropping and tail docking. Arizona’s HB 2537, Maryland’s HB 445, and West Virginia’s HB 2119 would prohibit declawing. New Hampshire’s HB 1683 would prohibit declawing, along with ear cropping, tail docking, declaw removal and devocalization. New Jersey’s A 1087 and S 920 and Rhode Island’s HB 7342 would prohibit declawing while NJ A 1211 would end ear cropping and tail docking. Hawaii’s HB 2163 and Washington’s HB 2317 and SB 6300 would prohibit ear cropping, tail docking, and devocalization. New York, a state which already prohibits declawing, is considering a bill that would prohibit devocalization (S 6904). Hearings have been held on bills that would prohibit declawing in Florida (SB 48) and New Hampshire (HB 1683). Measures would allow unlicensed persons to perform services West Virginia (SB 218) and Tennessee (HB 1945 and SB 1914) have bills that would permit consumers to hire unlicensed people, including those who practice veterinary medicine. The bills would require providers to disclose that they are not licensed. In Tennessee, a written agreement between the parties would be required prior to any work starting. Non-economic damages and expanded economic damages New Jersey is considering one bill dealing with non-economic damages and another with expanded economic damages.
    [Show full text]
  • Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Amendment (Tail Docking) Bill
    NSW Hansard Articles : LA : 06/04/2004 : #4 Page 1 of 3 Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Amendment (Tail Docking) Bill. Second Reading Mr GRAHAM WEST (Campbelltown—Parliamentary Secretary) [10.02 a.m.], on behalf of Mr David Campbell: I move: That this bill be now read a second time. The Australian Veterinary Association, the RSPCA and other animal welfare groups have, over a number of years, been lobbying strongly to ban the cosmetic tail docking of dogs. In their view, such a procedure is unnecessary and inhumane. There are two methods of tail docking. The banding procedure places a rubber ligature over the tail. This is usually an orthodontic band placed over the tail when the puppy is two to four days old. This effectively cuts off the blood supply to the tail, which comes off after a few days. The other procedure involves severance of the tail, usually with surgical scissors. Following a number of representations from animal welfare groups, veterinary bodies and other concerned individuals, the Primary Industries Ministerial Council agreed in October 2003 to introduce a nationally co-ordinated ban on cosmetic tail docking by April of this year. It is vital that the States and Territories work towards a national approach to key issues, and this decision will bring New South Wales legislation into line with that of every other Australian government. This national ban was proposed at the first Primary Industries Ministerial Council meeting that occurred after the current Minister took up his position. The Minister specifically asked that any action be held over until he had had the opportunity to fully consider the consequences and to canvass the viewpoints of all New South Wales stakeholders.
    [Show full text]
  • Organized Animal Protection and the Language of Rights in America, 1865-1900
    *DO NOT CITE OR DISTRIBUTE WITHOUT PERMISSION* “The Inalienable Rights of the Beasts”1: Organized Animal Protection and the Language of Rights in America, 1865-1900 Susan J. Pearson Assistant Professor, Department of History Northwestern University Telephone: 847-471-3744 1881 Sheridan Road Email: [email protected] Evanston, IL 60208 ABSTRACT Contemporary animal rights activists and legal scholars routinely charge that state animal protection statutes were enacted, not to serve the interests of animals, but rather to serve the interests of human beings in preventing immoral behavior. In this telling, laws preventing cruelty to animals are neither based on, nor do they establish, anything like rights for animals. Their raison d’etre, rather, is social control of human actions, and their function is to efficiently regulate the use of property in animals. The (critical) contemporary interpretation of the intent and function of animal cruelty laws is based on the accretion of actions – on court cases and current enforcement norms. This approach confuses the application and function of anticruelty laws with their intent and obscures the connections between the historical animal welfare movement and contemporary animal rights activism. By returning to the context in which most state anticruelty statutes were enacted – in the nineteenth century – and by considering the discourse of those activists who promoted the original legislation, my research reveals a more complicated story. Far from being concerned only with controlling the behavior of deviants, the nineteenth-century animal welfare activists who agitated for such laws situated them within a “lay discourse” of rights, borrowed from the successful abolitionist movement, that connected animal sentience, proved through portrayals of their suffering, to animal rights.
    [Show full text]