DOCSLIB.ORG

Coronavirus (COVID-19) Infection Survey, UK: 3 September 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Coronavirus (COVID-19) Infection Survey, UK: 3 September 2021 Statistical bulletin Coronavirus (COVID-19) Infection Survey, UK: 3 September 2021 Estimates forEngland, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland.This survey is being delivered in partnership with the University of Oxford, University of Manchester, Public Health England andWellcomeTrust. This study is jointly led by the ONS and the Department for Health and Social Care (DHSC) working with the University of Oxford and Lighthouse laboratory to collect and test samples. Contact: Release date: Next release: Rhiannon Yapp and Eleanor 3 September 2021 10 September 2021 Fordham infection.survey.analysis@ons. gov.uk +44 1633 560499 Table of contents 1. Main points 2. Percentage of people who had COVID-19 in England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland 3. Sub-national analysis of the number of people who had COVID-19 4. Age analysis of the number of people who had COVID-19 5. Number of new COVID-19 infections in England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland 6. Number of people testing positive for COVID-19 by variant 7. Test sensitivity and specificity 8. Coronavirus (COVID-19) Infection Survey data 9. Collaboration 10. Glossary 11. Measuring the data 12. Strengths and limitations 13. Related links Page 1 of 18 1 . Main points In England, the percentage of people testing positive for coronavirus (COVID-19) was level in the week ending 27 August 2021; we estimate that 766,100 people within the community population in England had COVID-19 (95% credible interval: 714,400 to 821,800), equating to around 1 in 70 people. In Wales, the percentage of people testing positive increased in the two weeks up to 28 August 2021, but the trend was uncertain in the most recent week; we estimate that 28,100 people in Wales had COVID-19 (95% credible interval: 20,000 to 38,400), equating to around 1 in 110 people. In Northern Ireland, the percentage of people testing positive decreased in the week ending 28 August 2021; we estimate that 28,700 people in Northern Ireland had COVID-19 (95% credible interval: 20,300 to 38,400), equating to around 1 in 65 people. In Scotland, the percentage of people testing positive increased in the week ending 28 August 2021; we estimate that 69,500 people in Scotland had COVID-19, (95% credible interval: 55,600 to 84,700) equating to around 1 in 75 people. Within this bulletin, we summarise some of the latest results from the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Infection Survey. For more detailed information on our methods you can view our COVID-19 Infection Survey: methods and further information. You can also read our article to find out more about comparing methods used in the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Infection Survey and NHS Test and Trace to better understand comparisons in data sources. About this bulletin In this bulletin, we refer to the number of current COVID-19 infections within the community population; community in this instance refers to private residential households and it excludes those in hospitals, care homes and/or other institutional settings. In institutional settings, rates of COVID-19 infection are likely to be different. More information about the COVID-19 pandemic from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) and other sources can be found in our Coronavirus (COVID-19) latest insights. The positivity rate is the percentage of people who have tested positive for COVID-19 on a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test at a point in time. We use current COVID-19 infections to mean testing positive for SARS- CoV-2, with or without having symptoms, on a swab taken from the nose and throat. This is different to the incidence rate, which is a measure of only the new PCR positive cases in a given time period. All analysis was produced with our research partners at the University of Oxford. More information on COVID-19 and taking part in our survey For more information, please visit the CIS participant guidance page. If you have any further questions, please email the CIS operations team: [email protected]. Find the latest on coronavirus (COVID-19) in the UK. Explore the latest coronavirus data from the ONS and other sources. View all coronavirus data. Find out how we are working safely in our studies and surveys. Early management information from the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Infection Survey is made available to government decision-makers to inform their response to COVID-19. Occasionally we may publish figures early if it is considered in the public interest. We will ensure that we pre-announce any ad hoc or early publications as soon as we can. These will include supporting information where possible to aid user understanding. This is consistent with guidance from the Office for Statistics Regulation (OSR). Page 2 of 18 How the data in this bulletin can be used The data can be used for: estimating the number of current positive cases in the community, including cases where people do not report having any symptoms identifying differences in numbers of positive cases between different regions estimating the number of new cases and change over time in positive cases The data cannot be used for: measuring the number of cases and infections in care homes, hospitals and/or other institutional settings providing information about recovery time of those infected 2 . Percentage of people who had COVID-19 in England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland In the week ending 27 August 2021, the percentage of people testing positive for coronavirus (COVID-19) was level in England. In Wales, the percentage of people testing positive increased in the two weeks up to 28 August 2021, but the trend was uncertain in the most recent week. In the week ending 28 August 2021, the percentage of people testing positive decreased in Northern Ireland and increased in Scotland. These estimates are based on statistical modelling of the trend in rates of positive nose and throat swab results. All our estimates are subject to uncertainty given that a sample is only part of the wider population. Therefore, caution should be taken in over-interpreting any small movements in the latest trends. Page 3 of 18 Table 1: Official reported estimates of the percentage of the population testing positive for COVID-19, UK countries Estimated percentage of the population testing positive for coronavirus (COVID-19) on nose and throat swabs, UK, 21 to 28 August 2021 Estimated Estimated Estimated average average average number % of the 95% credible 95% credible ratio of the 95% credible Country of people population interval interval population interval testing that had that had positive for COVID-19 COVID-19 COVID-19 Lower Upper Lower Upper Lower Upper 1.41 1.31 1.51 766,100 714,400 821,800 1 in 70 1 in 1 in England 75 65 0.92 0.66 1.26 28,100 20,000 38,400 1 in 110 1 in 1 in Wales 150 80 Northern 1.56 1.10 2.09 28,700 20,300 38,400 1 in 65 1 in 1 in Ireland 90 50 1.32 1.06 1.61 69,500 55,600 84,700 1 in 75 1 in 1 in Scotland 95 60 Source: Office for National Statistics – Coronavirus (COVID-19) Infection Survey Notes 1. All estimates are subject to uncertainty given that a sample is only part of the wider population. The model used to provide these estimates is a Bayesian model: these provide 95% credible intervals. A credible interval gives an indication of the uncertainty of an estimate from data analysis. 2. The ratios presented are rounded to the nearest 100 if over 1,000, to the nearest 10 if under 1,000 and to the nearest 5 if under 100. 3. These ratios do not represent a person's risk of becoming infected, since risk of infection depends on a number of factors such as contact with others or whether a person has been vaccinated. 4. The official estimate for England is for the week ending 27 August 2021, whereas the official estimates for Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland are for the week ending 28 August 2021. The models ended on different days this week because of availability of test results. Because of the relatively small number of tests in Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland in our sample, credible intervals are wide and therefore results should be interpreted with caution. These wide credible intervals mean that differences between the central estimates within and between nations may appear smaller or more exaggerated than they really are. Figure 1: The percentage of people testing positive for coronavirus (COVID 19) was level in England, decreased in Northern Ireland and increased in Scotland in the most recent week; rates increased over the latest two weeks in Wales Estimated percentage of the population testing positive for coronavirus on nose and throat swabs, UK, 7 August 2020 to 28 August 2021 Page 4 of 18 Notes: 1. All estimates are subject to uncertainty, given that a sample is only part of the wider population. The model used to provide these estimates is a Bayesian model: these provide 95% credible intervals. A credible interval gives an indication of the uncertainty of an estimate from data analysis. 2. Official reported estimates are plotted at a reference point believed to be most representative of the given week. 3. The official estimate presents the best estimate at that point in time. Modelled estimates are used to calculate the official reported estimate. The model smooths the series to understand the trend and is revised each week to incorporate new test results, providing the best indication of trend over time.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Read About the Impact of Creative Europe in NI 2014-20
    CREATIVE EUROPEThe impact of Creative Europe in the UK 2014 -2020June IN2018 NORTHERN IRELAND A report by Drew Wylie with the support of Creative Europe Desk UK Contents About this report 03 Introduction 04 Key Statistics 06 MEDIA Sub-Programme 07 A. Video Games Development 07 B. Slate and Single Project Development 10 C. Film Education 12 D. Support for TV Programming 14 E. Training and Markets 15 F. Europa Cinemas Network 17 Culture Sub-Programme 18 A. Cooperation Projects 18 B. Networks 26 C. Platforms 27 Front cover image: Cyr Wheel performer, Mr Dyvinetz, at Festival of Fools in Belfast. Image Credit: Simon Hutchinson 03 Creative Europe Programme 2014 - 2020 in Northern Ireland 1. About this report This report supplements the publication The Impact of Creative Europe in the UK: A report by SQW with the support of Creative Europe Desk UK1 in order to highlight the impacts of the programme in Northern Ireland. In the report we have collated a compendium of all the projects funded and intend it to communicate and document the legacy of the programme in Northern Ireland. It has been compiled by the Creative Europe Desk Northern Ireland Manager with contributions from programme stakeholders and beneficiaries. Creative Europe is the European Union’s programme the UK Government Department for Digital, Media, to support the cultural, creative and audiovisual sectors. Culture and Sport and the European Commission. It From 2014-2020, €1.46 billion was made available to promotes awareness and understanding of Creative support European projects with the potential to travel, Europe and provides free advice and support for reach new audiences and encourage skill sharing and applicants based in the UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Surveillance of Influenza and Other Seasonal Respiratory Viruses in the UK. Winter 2020 to 2021
    Surveillance of influenza and other seasonal respiratory viruses in the UK Winter 2020 to 2021 1 Surveillance of influenza and other seasonal respiratory viruses in the UK: Winter 2020 to 2021 Contents Glossary ............................................................................................................................... 3 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................. 4 Background .......................................................................................................................... 6 Community Surveillance ...................................................................................................... 8 Syndromic Surveillance .................................................................................................... 8 FluSurvey (Internet based surveillance) ......................................................................... 14 FluDetector (Internet based surveillance) ....................................................................... 15 Influenza outbreaks ........................................................................................................ 16 Primary Care Consultations ............................................................................................... 17 England .......................................................................................................................... 17 Scotland ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chief Inspector's Report
    Education and Training Inspectorate Chief Inspector’s Report 2014-2016 Providing inspection services for: Department of Education The Education and Training Inspectorate Department for the Economy Promoting Improvement and other commissioning Departments Contents Contents Page Foreword 1 Commentary 3 The quality of provision in pre-school education 40 The quality of provision in primary education 52 The quality of provision in post-primary education 62 The quality of provision in special educational needs and inclusion 72 The quality of provision in youth 82 The quality of provision in work-based learning, 90 further education and European social fund Work for other commissioning departments 104 Appendices 111 Chief Inspector’s Report 2014-2016 ForewordContents Quantitative terms used by the Education and Training Inspectorate In this report, proportions may be described as percentages, common fractions and in more general quantitative terms. Where more general terms are used, they should be interpreted as follows: Almost/nearly all - more than 90% Most - 75%-90% A majority - 50%-74% A significant minority - 30%-49% A minority - 10%-29% Very few/a small number - less than 10% Performance levels The Education and Training Inspectorate (ETI) use the following performance levels when reporting on Achievement and standards, on Provision for learning and on Leadership and management: Outstanding Very Good Good Important area(s) for improvement Requires significant improvement Requires urgent improvement Overall effectiveness The ETI use one of the following inspection outcomes when evaluating the overall effectiveness of the organisation: The organisation has a high level of capacity for sustained improvement in the interest of all the learners.
    [Show full text]
  • Scale of the Crisis Facing Tourism
    Scale of the Crisis Facing Tourism The Voice for Tourism in Northern Ireland Executive Summary It cannot be underestimated the crisis facing the tourism industry as a result of Covid-19. Tourism is a seasonal industry with almost 60% of revenues earned from April to November. The escalation of the outbreak of Covid-19 struck at the end of the quietest part of the tourism calendar with financial reserves at a minimum. Investments had been made in preparation for what was predicted to be one of our best years following the success of The Open and the launch of the new brand – Northern Ireland Embrace a Giant Spirit. During the lockdown period (March to June), non-essential travel ceased and unlike other sectors of the economy, working from home or finding alternatives to generating income was not an option for the majority of tourism businesses. It is estimated that this period of closure has resulted in over £300M in direct visitor spend being lost to the NI economy. In addition, 80% of staff are on part and full time furlough, redundancies have been made across the sector and there has been a significant knock on effect to supply chains. We have calculated the potential loss to 2020 visitor spend based on the Visit Britain updated estimates that the tourism industry in Northern Ireland could be facing losses of over £600M from overnight trips, a decrease of 70% on the estimated 2019 spend. Businesses that have reopened are struggling to break even. There are still sectors important to tourism, such as non-food pubs (indicative date 21st September), business conferencing and the Arts that are yet to reopen.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Demand Forecast
    ß´´ó·•´¿²¼ Ù»²»®¿¬·±² Ý¿°¿½·¬§ ͬ¿¬»³»²¬ îðïïóîðîð DISCLAIMER EirGrid and SONI have followed accepted industry practice in the collection and analysis of data available. While all reasonable care has been taken in the preparation of this data, EirGrid and SONI are not responsible for any loss that may be attributed to the use of this information. Prior to taking business decisions, interested parties are advised to seek separate and independent opinion in relation to the matters covered by this report and should not rely solely upon data and information contained herein. Information in this document does not amount to a recommendation in respect of any possible investment. This document does not purport to contain all the information that a prospective investor or participant in the Single Electricity Market may need. This document incorporates the Generation Capacity Statement for Northern Ireland and the Generation Adequacy Report for Ireland. For queries relating to this document or to request a copy contact [email protected] or [email protected] COPYRIGHT NOTICE All rights reserved. This entire publication is subject to the laws of copyright. This publication may not be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or manual, including photocopying without the prior written permission of EirGrid and SONI. ©SONI plc 2010 ©Eirgrid Plc 12 Manse Rd, Belfast, BT6 9RT The Oval, 160 Shelbourne Road, Ballsbridge, Dublin 4, Ireland Front cover image: Ardnacrusha Hydrogeneration plant (courtesy of ESB) and the generation site at Ballylumford (courtesy of AES Ballylumford Limited) Generation Capacity Statement FOREWORD EirGrid and SONI, as Transmission System Operators (TSOs) for Ireland and Northern Ireland respectively, are pleased to present the All-island Generation Capacity Statement 2011-2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Cross Border Studies in Ireland
    THE JOURNAL OF CROSS BORDER STUDIES IN IRELAND No. 6 Spring 2011 Cover illustration: ‘The Road to the West’ by John Luke. Picture used courtesy of Ulster Museum and the John Luke Estate. The Centre for Cross Border Studies is part-financed by the European Union’s European Regional Development Fund through the EU INTERREG IVA Programme managed by the Special EU Programmes Body JOURNAL OF CROSS BORDER STUDIES IN IRELAND No.6 1 The staff of the Centre for Cross Border Studies. From left to right: Andy Pollak, Ruth Taillon, Joseph Shiels, Annmarie O'Kane, Eimear Donnelly, Sebastian Rihm (intern), Mairead Hughes, Patricia McAllister, John Driscoll (Director of ICLRD). CONTENTS A word from the chairman 05 Chris Gibson ‘We need to be big and generous towards each other’: 13 interview on North-South cooperation with the NI Deputy First Minister, Martin McGuinness MP MLA By-passed places? The post-Belfast Agreement Border 25 Region Economy John Bradley and Michael Best Keeping up with the neighbours: Human Rights protection, 45 North and South, since the Belfast Agreement Michael Farrell The Dublin-Belfast rail line: the need for a better service to 59 lower North-South economic barriers Edgar Morgenroth Food Security and Health on the island of Ireland: 71 are we sleepwalking into a crisis? Jane Wilde JOURNAL OF CROSS BORDER STUDIES IN IRELAND No.6 3 SǾnderjylland-Schleswig: from conflict to cooperation in the 87 Danish-German Border Region Martin Klatt Cooperation Ireland: remaining relevant in a difficult 99 recessionary age Mary Minihan Index of Journal articles, 2006-2011 112 INFORMATION ABOUT THE CENTRE FOR CROSS BORDER STUDIES 115 INICCO projects 123 Universities Ireland 131 SCoTENS 142 International Centre for Local and Regional Development (ICLRD) 146 Past research projects 157 Conferences 164 What they say 169 Extracts from the Centre’s 2009-2010 Financial Statements 177 Contact details 179 The views expressed in this journal are the authors' own and do not necessarily reflect those of the Special EU Programmes Body or the European Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Policy Response to COVID-19 in Education—A Comparative Case Study of the UK Countries
    Early policy response to COVID-19 in education—A comparative case study of the UK countries Melissa Mouthaan, Martin Johnson, Jackie Greatorex, Tori Coleman, Sinéad Fitzsimons1 Research Division Introduction In this article, we report on a series of analyses that we carried out during the early course of the pandemic. In early 2020, researchers in the Education and Curriculum Team in Cambridge Assessment Research Division started a project that we called Curriculum Watch. The aim of this project was to collate a literature and documents database of education and curriculum policies, research and analyses from across the four countries of the United Kingdom (UK). Our work was inspired by the work of Raffe et al. (1999) who set out the positive benefits gained from comparing the policies of “the UK home nations”2. We anticipated that our Curriculum Watch database would provide a growing resource that could inform our understanding of education and curriculum issues beyond the UK. The literature base would also serve as an archive of events and our reflections on them. This is particularly useful as the presence of policy documents is sometimes short-lived, reflecting movements in policy decision-making. As the pandemic hit the UK in February 2020, it affected education policy in ways that were difficult to foresee. It was also challenging at the time to make sense of the policy shifts that were occurring. This context presented us with an opportunity to use our literature base to make sense of the emerging educational picture. Having a base of comparative policy and research literature allowed us to see how policy developments converged or diverged across the different countries of the UK, allowing us insight into some of the issues influencing education decision-making.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Lives Matter Protests
    Statutory Report PublicPublic S tatementStatement by by thethe PolicPolicee OmbudsmanOmbudsman in pursuantaccordance to Section 62 of withthe PSectionolice (Northern 62 of the Police Ireland) (Northern Act 199 Ireland)8. Act 1998 ANRelating INVESTIGATION to a complaint by the victims andINTO survivors POLICE of POLICYTHE MURDERS AND ATPRACTICE THE HEIGHTS OF BAR, PROTESTSLOUGHINISLAND IN NORTHERN ON 18 JUNE 1994 IRELAND. Published 22 December 2020. Contents Page Police Ombudsman’s Foreword Executive Summary Section 1: Introduction Section 2: Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) Regulations (NI) 2020 Section 3: The Public Concerns Section 4: The Police Ombudsman’s Investigation Section 5: Background to Black Lives Matter Protests Section 6: Policing Command Structure, Strategy and Operation Planning Section 7: The Black Lives Matter Protests Section 8: Protect Our Monuments Section 9: Conclusions and Recommendations This Report does not examine the facts or circumstances of individual cases where allegations of non- compliance with the Regulations have been made or alleged breaches of public and human rights law by those who claim to have been adversely affected by the implementation of the policies examined as part of the Report. ___________________________________________________________________ Page 2 of 88 Police Ombudsman’s Foreword The challenges arising from the Coronavirus pandemic have been experienced by humanity on a global scale. These are unprecedented times and the response from governments and locally the Northern Ireland Assembly (the Assembly) correctly had focused on the public health measures needed to ensure we are all safe. The Northern Ireland Executive’s response has been to bring forward the Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2020 (the Regulations).
    [Show full text]
  • Written Answers to Questions Official Report (Hansard)
    Written Answers to Questions Official Report (Hansard) Friday 17 May 2013 Volume 85, No WA1 This publication contains the written answers to questions tabled by Members. The content of the responses is as received at the time from the relevant Minister or representative of the Assembly Commission and has not been subject to the official reporting process or changed in any way. Contents Written Answers to Questions Office of the First Minister and deputy First Minister ................................................................... WA 1 Department of Agriculture and Rural Development ...................................................................... WA 5 Department of Culture, Arts and Leisure .................................................................................. WA 11 Department of Education ........................................................................................................ WA 12 Department for Employment and Learning ................................................................................ WA 33 Department of Enterprise, Trade and Investment ...................................................................... WA 39 Department of the Environment ............................................................................................... WA 50 Department of Finance and Personnel ..................................................................................... WA 59 Department of Health, Social Services and Public Safety ........................................................... WA
    [Show full text]
  • Adult Education and Training Funding
    Published on Eurydice (https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/national-policies/eurydice) This article covers public funding for education for adults aged 19+, and for apprenticeships, traineeships and youth training programmes, which are available for young people from the age of 16. It also covers funding for 16- to 19-year-olds following general or vocational education courses in further education (FE) colleges [1]. The funding of general and vocational education for 16- to 19-year- olds in school sixth forms [2] is covered in the article on ‘Early Childhood and School Education Funding [3]’. Northern Ireland’s six further education (FE) colleges are at the centre of provision. Programmes are also delivered by private training providers and employers, often working in partnership with the FE colleges to offer a wide range of academic, vocational and leisure / recreational courses for adults. Policy for funding adult education and training, further education [4], and employment and skills programmes in Northern Ireland falls within the remit of the Department for the Economy (DfE) [5]. Public funding is made available for adults to: gain nationally recognised qualifications help them improve their essential skills (literacy, numeracy and ICT) help them improve their skills to make a successful transition into the labour market or to progress to higher level education or training undertake apprenticeships and gain recognised qualifications in the workplace. Depending on the learner and type of programme, some adult learners are entitled to full government funding, which means that no tuition fees are charged, while some programmes are partly government funded. Other learners, or their employers, have to meet the full cost of their programmes.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Ireland European Social Fund 2014-2020 Project Direstory
    Northern Ireland European Social Fund 2014-2020 Project Directory INDEX Page Project Project Number Number Active Inclusion Project 3 100158 AMH Working It Out 4 100137 ASPIRE 5 100211 Belfast Step Into Employment Programme 6 100116 Clanrye Family Foundations 7 100107 Clanrye Positive Directions 8 100095 CO-MENT 9 100088 Community Family Support Programme (Customized Training Services) 10 100128 Community Family Support Programme (Network Personnel) 11 100124 Community Family Support Programme (Upper Springfield Development Trust) 12 10006 Connect Programme 13 100047 Core Project 14 100082 Diverse Ability 15 100149 Dr B’s Kitchen 16 100024 Education, Training & Employability (ETEP) 17 100100 EmployAbility 18 100136 Explore Enterprise 19 100171 Exploring Enterprise3 Programme 20 100012 Externworks 21 100077 Eye Work Too 22 100009 Food for Thought 23 100120 Get Connected 24 100005 GET SET for Work 25 100025 Give and Take 26 100013 Hands On Training Programme (HOT) 27 100173 Inclusion Works 28 100010 Job Match (Disability Action) 29 100178 Job Match (The Appleby Trust) 30 100205 JOBMATCH 31 100080 JobWorks 32 100121 Journey to Success 33 100078 Kickstart to Work 34 100108 Learning Northwest 35 100204 1 INDEX Page Project Project Number Number LEMIS Northwest 36 100093 LEMIS+ 37 100176 Lemis+ Project 38 100097 Manufacturing Skills for Industry 39 100139 Moving Forward, Moving On 40 100187 OPTIO 41 100143 Path 2 Employment (P2E) 42 100058 People 1st Community Family Support 43 100177 PRACTICA 44 100182 Progression to Employment Service 2020
    [Show full text]
  • Excess Mortality and Covid-19 Related Deaths in Northern Ireland
    Statistical bulletin Covid-19 Related Deaths in Northern Ireland Deaths Occurring During March to August 2020 Key Points • There were 875 deaths involving Covid-19 between 1 March and 31 August 2020, accounting for 10.9% of all deaths. • Taking into account the age structure of the population in Northern Ireland, the age-standardised mortality rate (ASMR) relating to deaths involving Covid-19 was 55.2 per 100,000 persons. Males had a significantly higher rate of death linked to COVID-19; the ASMR for males was 69.9 deaths per 100,000 of the male population compared with 45.8 deaths per 100,000 females (Figure 4). • Monthly Covid-19 ASMRs per 100,000 were highest in April (36.7 for males and 23.4 for females) and lowest in August (1.9 for males and 0.6 for females) (Figure 5). • Belfast Local Government District (LGD) had the highest Covid-19 related ASMR with 90.0 deaths per 100,000, followed by Antrim & Newtownabbey LGD at 73.1 (per 100,000). Fermanagh & Omagh had the lowest Covid-19 related ASMR of 17.2 (per 100,000), followed by the neighbouring Derry & Strabane with an ASMR of 27.0 (per 100,000) (Figures 6A and 6B). • For Assembly Areas, Belfast West (113.7), Belfast North (93.5) and Belfast East (90.8) had the highest Covid-19 related ASMRs per 100,000. The ASMR for South Down was lowest at 19.9 per 100,000 (Figures 6A and 6B). • Covid-19 related ASMRs were highest in the 20% most deprived areas at 66.0 deaths per 100,000 population, followed by the 20% least deprived areas at 60.4 deaths (per 100,000) (Figure 7).
    [Show full text]