DOCSLIB.ORG

Written Answers to Questions Official Report (Hansard)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Written Answers to Questions Official Report (Hansard) Written Answers to Questions Official Report (Hansard) Friday 17 May 2013 Volume 85, No WA1 This publication contains the written answers to questions tabled by Members. The content of the responses is as received at the time from the relevant Minister or representative of the Assembly Commission and has not been subject to the official reporting process or changed in any way. Contents Written Answers to Questions Office of the First Minister and deputy First Minister ................................................................... WA 1 Department of Agriculture and Rural Development ...................................................................... WA 5 Department of Culture, Arts and Leisure .................................................................................. WA 11 Department of Education ........................................................................................................ WA 12 Department for Employment and Learning ................................................................................ WA 33 Department of Enterprise, Trade and Investment ...................................................................... WA 39 Department of the Environment ............................................................................................... WA 50 Department of Finance and Personnel ..................................................................................... WA 59 Department of Health, Social Services and Public Safety ........................................................... WA 67 Department of Justice ............................................................................................................ WA 91 Department for Regional Development ................................................................................... WA 103 Department for Social Development ...................................................................................... WA 123 Suggested amendments or corrections will be considered by the Editor. They should be sent to: The Editor of Debates, Room 248, Parliament Buildings, Belfast BT4 3XX. Tel: 028 9052 1135 · e-mail: [email protected] to arrive not later than two weeks after publication of this report. Assembly Members Agnew, Steven (North Down) McAleer, Declan (West Tyrone) Allister, Jim (North Antrim) McCallister, John (South Down) Anderson, Sydney (Upper Bann) McCann, Fra (West Belfast) Attwood, Alex (West Belfast) McCann, Ms Jennifer (West Belfast) Beggs, Roy (East Antrim) McCarthy, Kieran (Strangford) Bell, Jonathan (Strangford) McCartney, Raymond (Foyle) Boylan, Cathal (Newry and Armagh) McCausland, Nelson (North Belfast) Boyle, Ms Michaela (West Tyrone) McClarty, David (East Londonderry) Bradley, Dominic (Newry and Armagh) McCorley, Ms Rosaleen (West Belfast) Bradley, Ms Paula (North Belfast) McCrea, Basil (Lagan Valley) Brady, Mickey (Newry and Armagh) McCrea, Ian (Mid Ulster) Brown, Ms Pam (South Antrim) McDevitt, Conall (South Belfast) Buchanan, Thomas (West Tyrone) McDonnell, Dr Alasdair (South Belfast) Byrne, Joe (West Tyrone) McElduff, Barry (West Tyrone) Campbell, Gregory (East Londonderry) McGahan, Ms Bronwyn (Fermanagh and South Tyrone) Clarke, Trevor (South Antrim) McGimpsey, Michael (South Belfast) Cochrane, Mrs Judith (East Belfast) McGlone, Patsy (Mid Ulster) Copeland, Michael (East Belfast) McGuinness, Martin (Mid Ulster) Craig, Jonathan (Lagan Valley) McIlveen, David (North Antrim) Cree, Leslie (North Down) McIlveen, Miss Michelle (Strangford) Dallat, John (East Londonderry) McKay, Daithí (North Antrim) Dickson, Stewart (East Antrim) McKevitt, Mrs Karen (South Down) Dobson, Mrs Jo-Anne (Upper Bann) McLaughlin, Ms Maeve (Foyle) Douglas, Sammy (East Belfast) McLaughlin, Mitchel (South Antrim) Dunne, Gordon (North Down) McMullan, Oliver (East Antrim) Durkan, Mark H (Foyle) McNarry, David (Strangford) Easton, Alex (North Down) McQuillan, Adrian (East Londonderry) Eastwood, Colum (Foyle) Maginness, Alban (North Belfast) Elliott, Tom (Fermanagh and South Tyrone) Maskey, Alex (South Belfast) Farry, Dr Stephen (North Down) Molloy, Francie (Mid Ulster) Fearon, Ms Megan (Newry and Armagh) Morrow, The Lord (Fermanagh and South Tyrone) Flanagan, Phil (Fermanagh and South Tyrone) Moutray, Stephen (Upper Bann) Ford, David (South Antrim) Nesbitt, Mike (Strangford) Foster, Mrs Arlene (Fermanagh and South Tyrone) Newton, Robin (East Belfast) Frew, Paul (North Antrim) Ní Chuilín, Ms Carál (North Belfast) Gardiner, Samuel (Upper Bann) Ó hOisín, Cathal (East Londonderry) Girvan, Paul (South Antrim) O’Dowd, John (Upper Bann) Givan, Paul (Lagan Valley) O’Neill, Mrs Michelle (Mid Ulster) Hale, Mrs Brenda (Lagan Valley) Overend, Mrs Sandra (Mid Ulster) Hamilton, Simon (Strangford) Poots, Edwin (Lagan Valley) Hay, William (Speaker) Ramsey, Pat (Foyle) Hazzard, Christopher (South Down) Ramsey, Ms Sue (West Belfast) Hilditch, David (East Antrim) Robinson, George (East Londonderry) Humphrey, William (North Belfast) Robinson, Peter (East Belfast) Hussey, Ross (West Tyrone) Rogers, Sean (South Down) Irwin, William (Newry and Armagh) Ross, Alastair (East Antrim) Kelly, Mrs Dolores (Upper Bann) Ruane, Ms Caitríona (South Down) Kelly, Gerry (North Belfast) Sheehan, Pat (West Belfast) Kennedy, Danny (Newry and Armagh) Spratt, Jimmy (South Belfast) Kinahan, Danny (South Antrim) Storey, Mervyn (North Antrim) Lo, Ms Anna (South Belfast) Swann, Robin (North Antrim) Lunn, Trevor (Lagan Valley) Weir, Peter (North Down) Lynch, Seán (Fermanagh and South Tyrone) Wells, Jim (South Down) Lyttle, Chris (East Belfast) Wilson, Sammy (East Antrim) Friday 17 May 2013 Written Answers Northern Ireland Assembly Friday 17 May 2013 Written Answers to Questions Office of the First Minister and deputy First Minister Maze Development: Road Infrastructure Proposals Mr Craig asked the First Minister and deputy First Minister for an update on the road infrastructure proposals for the Maze development. (AQO 3710/11-15) Mr P Robinson and Mr M McGuinness (The First Minister and deputy First Minister): The regeneration of Maze/Long Kesh site is one of the commitments identified under the Executive’s Programme for Government for 2011-15. A key objective under that commitment is for site infrastructure development work to commence in 2013-14. We established the Maze/Long Kesh Development Corporation last September to regenerate the site and meet this commitment. The recent adjournment debate on the road infrastructure of the M1 link to the site highlighted the considerable progress the Development Corporation has made since its inception, including the provision of essential internal infrastructure and an additional entrance in time for the first RUAS Agricultural Show to be held on the site in May. In addition, the Corporation is commencing initial survey work and feasibility studies for inclusion in their detailed proposals for improving infrastructure linkages to the site, including a link to the M1. These wider road developments are seen as key to the overall delivery of regeneration of the site and to attract private sector investment. Indeed, £21 million has been allocated by OFMDFM in the current CSR period for the regeneration of the site which includes essential infrastructure. However, no decisions have been taken regarding the preferred options for linkages to the M1, nor will decisions be made without engagement with stakeholders and the local community. Ministry of Defence: Decontamination and Maintenance Costs of Former Security Sites Mr Nesbitt asked the First Minister and deputy First Minister how much the Ministry of Defence has contributed to decontamination and maintenance costs for former security sites, broken down by site. (AQW 21742/11-15) Mr P Robinson and Mr M McGuinness: The Ministry of Defence has not contributed to decontamination and maintenance costs of the former security sites gifted to the Executive and held by our Department. WA 1 Friday 17 May 2013 Written Answers Ministry of Defence: Decontamination and Maintenance Costs of Former Security Sites Mr Nesbitt asked the First Minister and deputy First Minister what discussions they have had with (i) Central Procurement Directorate; and (ii) the Ministry of Defence on the level of the contributions made by the Ministry of Defence for the decontamination and maintenance costs of each former security sites. (AQW 21743/11-15) Mr P Robinson and Mr M McGuinness: There were a number of meetings with the Ministry of Defence (MOD) and with Central Procurement Directorate on the issue of the gifting of sites and decontamination. The MOD and the Chief Secretary to the Treasury confirmed that as the sites were being gifted it was not MOD policy to underwrite decontamination costs at its former military sites before disposal. The MOD confirmed its policy to sell each site ‘as seen’ and they provided us with all MOD land quality assessments previously undertaken. At the time of transfer, officials worked with the Central Procurement Directorate (CPD) on the review of the land quality assessments provided by the MOD and the process to determine accurate contamination levels at the gifted sites. Officials also sought advice from CPD on maintenance costs for these sites. Our officials continue to work closely with CPD on these important issues to ensure sites are safe and maintenance costs are kept to a minimum. Shackleton Army Barracks at Ballykelly Mr Dallat asked the First Minister and deputy First Minister (i) what work has taken place on the decontamination of the former Shackleton
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Read About the Impact of Creative Europe in NI 2014-20
    CREATIVE EUROPEThe impact of Creative Europe in the UK 2014 -2020June IN2018 NORTHERN IRELAND A report by Drew Wylie with the support of Creative Europe Desk UK Contents About this report 03 Introduction 04 Key Statistics 06 MEDIA Sub-Programme 07 A. Video Games Development 07 B. Slate and Single Project Development 10 C. Film Education 12 D. Support for TV Programming 14 E. Training and Markets 15 F. Europa Cinemas Network 17 Culture Sub-Programme 18 A. Cooperation Projects 18 B. Networks 26 C. Platforms 27 Front cover image: Cyr Wheel performer, Mr Dyvinetz, at Festival of Fools in Belfast. Image Credit: Simon Hutchinson 03 Creative Europe Programme 2014 - 2020 in Northern Ireland 1. About this report This report supplements the publication The Impact of Creative Europe in the UK: A report by SQW with the support of Creative Europe Desk UK1 in order to highlight the impacts of the programme in Northern Ireland. In the report we have collated a compendium of all the projects funded and intend it to communicate and document the legacy of the programme in Northern Ireland. It has been compiled by the Creative Europe Desk Northern Ireland Manager with contributions from programme stakeholders and beneficiaries. Creative Europe is the European Union’s programme the UK Government Department for Digital, Media, to support the cultural, creative and audiovisual sectors. Culture and Sport and the European Commission. It From 2014-2020, €1.46 billion was made available to promotes awareness and understanding of Creative support European projects with the potential to travel, Europe and provides free advice and support for reach new audiences and encourage skill sharing and applicants based in the UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Surveillance of Influenza and Other Seasonal Respiratory Viruses in the UK. Winter 2020 to 2021
    Surveillance of influenza and other seasonal respiratory viruses in the UK Winter 2020 to 2021 1 Surveillance of influenza and other seasonal respiratory viruses in the UK: Winter 2020 to 2021 Contents Glossary ............................................................................................................................... 3 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................. 4 Background .......................................................................................................................... 6 Community Surveillance ...................................................................................................... 8 Syndromic Surveillance .................................................................................................... 8 FluSurvey (Internet based surveillance) ......................................................................... 14 FluDetector (Internet based surveillance) ....................................................................... 15 Influenza outbreaks ........................................................................................................ 16 Primary Care Consultations ............................................................................................... 17 England .......................................................................................................................... 17 Scotland ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chief Inspector's Report
    Education and Training Inspectorate Chief Inspector’s Report 2014-2016 Providing inspection services for: Department of Education The Education and Training Inspectorate Department for the Economy Promoting Improvement and other commissioning Departments Contents Contents Page Foreword 1 Commentary 3 The quality of provision in pre-school education 40 The quality of provision in primary education 52 The quality of provision in post-primary education 62 The quality of provision in special educational needs and inclusion 72 The quality of provision in youth 82 The quality of provision in work-based learning, 90 further education and European social fund Work for other commissioning departments 104 Appendices 111 Chief Inspector’s Report 2014-2016 ForewordContents Quantitative terms used by the Education and Training Inspectorate In this report, proportions may be described as percentages, common fractions and in more general quantitative terms. Where more general terms are used, they should be interpreted as follows: Almost/nearly all - more than 90% Most - 75%-90% A majority - 50%-74% A significant minority - 30%-49% A minority - 10%-29% Very few/a small number - less than 10% Performance levels The Education and Training Inspectorate (ETI) use the following performance levels when reporting on Achievement and standards, on Provision for learning and on Leadership and management: Outstanding Very Good Good Important area(s) for improvement Requires significant improvement Requires urgent improvement Overall effectiveness The ETI use one of the following inspection outcomes when evaluating the overall effectiveness of the organisation: The organisation has a high level of capacity for sustained improvement in the interest of all the learners.
    [Show full text]
  • Scale of the Crisis Facing Tourism
    Scale of the Crisis Facing Tourism The Voice for Tourism in Northern Ireland Executive Summary It cannot be underestimated the crisis facing the tourism industry as a result of Covid-19. Tourism is a seasonal industry with almost 60% of revenues earned from April to November. The escalation of the outbreak of Covid-19 struck at the end of the quietest part of the tourism calendar with financial reserves at a minimum. Investments had been made in preparation for what was predicted to be one of our best years following the success of The Open and the launch of the new brand – Northern Ireland Embrace a Giant Spirit. During the lockdown period (March to June), non-essential travel ceased and unlike other sectors of the economy, working from home or finding alternatives to generating income was not an option for the majority of tourism businesses. It is estimated that this period of closure has resulted in over £300M in direct visitor spend being lost to the NI economy. In addition, 80% of staff are on part and full time furlough, redundancies have been made across the sector and there has been a significant knock on effect to supply chains. We have calculated the potential loss to 2020 visitor spend based on the Visit Britain updated estimates that the tourism industry in Northern Ireland could be facing losses of over £600M from overnight trips, a decrease of 70% on the estimated 2019 spend. Businesses that have reopened are struggling to break even. There are still sectors important to tourism, such as non-food pubs (indicative date 21st September), business conferencing and the Arts that are yet to reopen.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Demand Forecast
    ß´´ó·•´¿²¼ Ù»²»®¿¬·±² Ý¿°¿½·¬§ ͬ¿¬»³»²¬ îðïïóîðîð DISCLAIMER EirGrid and SONI have followed accepted industry practice in the collection and analysis of data available. While all reasonable care has been taken in the preparation of this data, EirGrid and SONI are not responsible for any loss that may be attributed to the use of this information. Prior to taking business decisions, interested parties are advised to seek separate and independent opinion in relation to the matters covered by this report and should not rely solely upon data and information contained herein. Information in this document does not amount to a recommendation in respect of any possible investment. This document does not purport to contain all the information that a prospective investor or participant in the Single Electricity Market may need. This document incorporates the Generation Capacity Statement for Northern Ireland and the Generation Adequacy Report for Ireland. For queries relating to this document or to request a copy contact [email protected] or [email protected] COPYRIGHT NOTICE All rights reserved. This entire publication is subject to the laws of copyright. This publication may not be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or manual, including photocopying without the prior written permission of EirGrid and SONI. ©SONI plc 2010 ©Eirgrid Plc 12 Manse Rd, Belfast, BT6 9RT The Oval, 160 Shelbourne Road, Ballsbridge, Dublin 4, Ireland Front cover image: Ardnacrusha Hydrogeneration plant (courtesy of ESB) and the generation site at Ballylumford (courtesy of AES Ballylumford Limited) Generation Capacity Statement FOREWORD EirGrid and SONI, as Transmission System Operators (TSOs) for Ireland and Northern Ireland respectively, are pleased to present the All-island Generation Capacity Statement 2011-2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Cross Border Studies in Ireland
    THE JOURNAL OF CROSS BORDER STUDIES IN IRELAND No. 6 Spring 2011 Cover illustration: ‘The Road to the West’ by John Luke. Picture used courtesy of Ulster Museum and the John Luke Estate. The Centre for Cross Border Studies is part-financed by the European Union’s European Regional Development Fund through the EU INTERREG IVA Programme managed by the Special EU Programmes Body JOURNAL OF CROSS BORDER STUDIES IN IRELAND No.6 1 The staff of the Centre for Cross Border Studies. From left to right: Andy Pollak, Ruth Taillon, Joseph Shiels, Annmarie O'Kane, Eimear Donnelly, Sebastian Rihm (intern), Mairead Hughes, Patricia McAllister, John Driscoll (Director of ICLRD). CONTENTS A word from the chairman 05 Chris Gibson ‘We need to be big and generous towards each other’: 13 interview on North-South cooperation with the NI Deputy First Minister, Martin McGuinness MP MLA By-passed places? The post-Belfast Agreement Border 25 Region Economy John Bradley and Michael Best Keeping up with the neighbours: Human Rights protection, 45 North and South, since the Belfast Agreement Michael Farrell The Dublin-Belfast rail line: the need for a better service to 59 lower North-South economic barriers Edgar Morgenroth Food Security and Health on the island of Ireland: 71 are we sleepwalking into a crisis? Jane Wilde JOURNAL OF CROSS BORDER STUDIES IN IRELAND No.6 3 SǾnderjylland-Schleswig: from conflict to cooperation in the 87 Danish-German Border Region Martin Klatt Cooperation Ireland: remaining relevant in a difficult 99 recessionary age Mary Minihan Index of Journal articles, 2006-2011 112 INFORMATION ABOUT THE CENTRE FOR CROSS BORDER STUDIES 115 INICCO projects 123 Universities Ireland 131 SCoTENS 142 International Centre for Local and Regional Development (ICLRD) 146 Past research projects 157 Conferences 164 What they say 169 Extracts from the Centre’s 2009-2010 Financial Statements 177 Contact details 179 The views expressed in this journal are the authors' own and do not necessarily reflect those of the Special EU Programmes Body or the European Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Policy Response to COVID-19 in Education—A Comparative Case Study of the UK Countries
    Early policy response to COVID-19 in education—A comparative case study of the UK countries Melissa Mouthaan, Martin Johnson, Jackie Greatorex, Tori Coleman, Sinéad Fitzsimons1 Research Division Introduction In this article, we report on a series of analyses that we carried out during the early course of the pandemic. In early 2020, researchers in the Education and Curriculum Team in Cambridge Assessment Research Division started a project that we called Curriculum Watch. The aim of this project was to collate a literature and documents database of education and curriculum policies, research and analyses from across the four countries of the United Kingdom (UK). Our work was inspired by the work of Raffe et al. (1999) who set out the positive benefits gained from comparing the policies of “the UK home nations”2. We anticipated that our Curriculum Watch database would provide a growing resource that could inform our understanding of education and curriculum issues beyond the UK. The literature base would also serve as an archive of events and our reflections on them. This is particularly useful as the presence of policy documents is sometimes short-lived, reflecting movements in policy decision-making. As the pandemic hit the UK in February 2020, it affected education policy in ways that were difficult to foresee. It was also challenging at the time to make sense of the policy shifts that were occurring. This context presented us with an opportunity to use our literature base to make sense of the emerging educational picture. Having a base of comparative policy and research literature allowed us to see how policy developments converged or diverged across the different countries of the UK, allowing us insight into some of the issues influencing education decision-making.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Lives Matter Protests
    Statutory Report PublicPublic S tatementStatement by by thethe PolicPolicee OmbudsmanOmbudsman in pursuantaccordance to Section 62 of withthe PSectionolice (Northern 62 of the Police Ireland) (Northern Act 199 Ireland)8. Act 1998 ANRelating INVESTIGATION to a complaint by the victims andINTO survivors POLICE of POLICYTHE MURDERS AND ATPRACTICE THE HEIGHTS OF BAR, PROTESTSLOUGHINISLAND IN NORTHERN ON 18 JUNE 1994 IRELAND. Published 22 December 2020. Contents Page Police Ombudsman’s Foreword Executive Summary Section 1: Introduction Section 2: Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) Regulations (NI) 2020 Section 3: The Public Concerns Section 4: The Police Ombudsman’s Investigation Section 5: Background to Black Lives Matter Protests Section 6: Policing Command Structure, Strategy and Operation Planning Section 7: The Black Lives Matter Protests Section 8: Protect Our Monuments Section 9: Conclusions and Recommendations This Report does not examine the facts or circumstances of individual cases where allegations of non- compliance with the Regulations have been made or alleged breaches of public and human rights law by those who claim to have been adversely affected by the implementation of the policies examined as part of the Report. ___________________________________________________________________ Page 2 of 88 Police Ombudsman’s Foreword The challenges arising from the Coronavirus pandemic have been experienced by humanity on a global scale. These are unprecedented times and the response from governments and locally the Northern Ireland Assembly (the Assembly) correctly had focused on the public health measures needed to ensure we are all safe. The Northern Ireland Executive’s response has been to bring forward the Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2020 (the Regulations).
    [Show full text]
  • Adult Education and Training Funding
    Published on Eurydice (https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/national-policies/eurydice) This article covers public funding for education for adults aged 19+, and for apprenticeships, traineeships and youth training programmes, which are available for young people from the age of 16. It also covers funding for 16- to 19-year-olds following general or vocational education courses in further education (FE) colleges [1]. The funding of general and vocational education for 16- to 19-year- olds in school sixth forms [2] is covered in the article on ‘Early Childhood and School Education Funding [3]’. Northern Ireland’s six further education (FE) colleges are at the centre of provision. Programmes are also delivered by private training providers and employers, often working in partnership with the FE colleges to offer a wide range of academic, vocational and leisure / recreational courses for adults. Policy for funding adult education and training, further education [4], and employment and skills programmes in Northern Ireland falls within the remit of the Department for the Economy (DfE) [5]. Public funding is made available for adults to: gain nationally recognised qualifications help them improve their essential skills (literacy, numeracy and ICT) help them improve their skills to make a successful transition into the labour market or to progress to higher level education or training undertake apprenticeships and gain recognised qualifications in the workplace. Depending on the learner and type of programme, some adult learners are entitled to full government funding, which means that no tuition fees are charged, while some programmes are partly government funded. Other learners, or their employers, have to meet the full cost of their programmes.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Ireland European Social Fund 2014-2020 Project Direstory
    Northern Ireland European Social Fund 2014-2020 Project Directory INDEX Page Project Project Number Number Active Inclusion Project 3 100158 AMH Working It Out 4 100137 ASPIRE 5 100211 Belfast Step Into Employment Programme 6 100116 Clanrye Family Foundations 7 100107 Clanrye Positive Directions 8 100095 CO-MENT 9 100088 Community Family Support Programme (Customized Training Services) 10 100128 Community Family Support Programme (Network Personnel) 11 100124 Community Family Support Programme (Upper Springfield Development Trust) 12 10006 Connect Programme 13 100047 Core Project 14 100082 Diverse Ability 15 100149 Dr B’s Kitchen 16 100024 Education, Training & Employability (ETEP) 17 100100 EmployAbility 18 100136 Explore Enterprise 19 100171 Exploring Enterprise3 Programme 20 100012 Externworks 21 100077 Eye Work Too 22 100009 Food for Thought 23 100120 Get Connected 24 100005 GET SET for Work 25 100025 Give and Take 26 100013 Hands On Training Programme (HOT) 27 100173 Inclusion Works 28 100010 Job Match (Disability Action) 29 100178 Job Match (The Appleby Trust) 30 100205 JOBMATCH 31 100080 JobWorks 32 100121 Journey to Success 33 100078 Kickstart to Work 34 100108 Learning Northwest 35 100204 1 INDEX Page Project Project Number Number LEMIS Northwest 36 100093 LEMIS+ 37 100176 Lemis+ Project 38 100097 Manufacturing Skills for Industry 39 100139 Moving Forward, Moving On 40 100187 OPTIO 41 100143 Path 2 Employment (P2E) 42 100058 People 1st Community Family Support 43 100177 PRACTICA 44 100182 Progression to Employment Service 2020
    [Show full text]
  • Excess Mortality and Covid-19 Related Deaths in Northern Ireland
    Statistical bulletin Covid-19 Related Deaths in Northern Ireland Deaths Occurring During March to August 2020 Key Points • There were 875 deaths involving Covid-19 between 1 March and 31 August 2020, accounting for 10.9% of all deaths. • Taking into account the age structure of the population in Northern Ireland, the age-standardised mortality rate (ASMR) relating to deaths involving Covid-19 was 55.2 per 100,000 persons. Males had a significantly higher rate of death linked to COVID-19; the ASMR for males was 69.9 deaths per 100,000 of the male population compared with 45.8 deaths per 100,000 females (Figure 4). • Monthly Covid-19 ASMRs per 100,000 were highest in April (36.7 for males and 23.4 for females) and lowest in August (1.9 for males and 0.6 for females) (Figure 5). • Belfast Local Government District (LGD) had the highest Covid-19 related ASMR with 90.0 deaths per 100,000, followed by Antrim & Newtownabbey LGD at 73.1 (per 100,000). Fermanagh & Omagh had the lowest Covid-19 related ASMR of 17.2 (per 100,000), followed by the neighbouring Derry & Strabane with an ASMR of 27.0 (per 100,000) (Figures 6A and 6B). • For Assembly Areas, Belfast West (113.7), Belfast North (93.5) and Belfast East (90.8) had the highest Covid-19 related ASMRs per 100,000. The ASMR for South Down was lowest at 19.9 per 100,000 (Figures 6A and 6B). • Covid-19 related ASMRs were highest in the 20% most deprived areas at 66.0 deaths per 100,000 population, followed by the 20% least deprived areas at 60.4 deaths (per 100,000) (Figure 7).
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Ireland Seabird Report, Covering 2019
    Northern Ireland This is the sixth edition of the Northern Ireland Seabird Report, covering 2019. The report is the published outcome of the work of the Northern Ireland Seabird Network Seabird Report – a network of volunteers, researchers and organisations – coordinated by the BTO Seabird Coordinator, and funded by NIEA. 2019 British Trust for Ornithology Head Office: ISBN No 978-1-912642-17-5 The Nunnery, Thetford Norfolk IP24 2PU Tel: +44 (0)1842 750050 www.bto.org Registered Charity No. 216652 (England & Wales) SC039193 (Scotland) Company Limited by Guarantee No. 357284 (England & Wales) FRONT COVER IMAGE: GUILLEMOT, BY PHILIP CROFT / BTO 9 781912 642175 Northern Ireland Seabird Report 2019 NI Seabird Steering Group Dave Allen (Allen & Mellon Environmental) Katherine Booth Jones (BTO) Kendrew Colhoun (KRC Ecological) Gillian Gilbert (RSPB) Kerry Leonard (Sterna Environmental) Neil McCulloch (NIEA) Andrew Upton (National Trust) Report editor Katherine Booth Jones This report is the published outcome of the work of the Northern Ireland Seabird Network – a network of volunteers, researchers and organisations – coordinated by the BTO Seabird Coordinator, and funded by NIEA. British Trust for Ornithology The Nunnery Thetford Norfolk IP24 2PU www.bto.org [email protected] +44 (0) 1842 750050 Registered Charity No.216652 (England & Wales) No.SC039193 (Scotland). Company Limited by Guarantee No. 357284 (England & Wales) February 2020 © British Trust for Ornithology & Northern Ireland Environment Agency ISBN 978-1-912642-17-5 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form, or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publishers.
    [Show full text]