DOCSLIB.ORG

Quarterly Aviation Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Quarterly Aviation Report Quarterly Aviation Report DUTCH SAFETY BOARD page 4 Investigations Within the Aviation sector, the Dutch Safety Board is required by law to investigate occurrences involving aircraft on or above Dutch territory. In addition, the Board has a statutory duty to investigate occurrences involving Dutch aircraft over open sea. Its July - September 2020 investigations are conducted in accordance with the Safety Board Kingdom Act and Regulation (EU) During the past quarter, the Dutch Safety Board published two aviation no. 996/2010 of the European reports. One discussed the fi rst accident involving an electrically powered Parliament and of the Council of microlight aeroplane in the Netherlands. The Board concluded that a 20 October 2010 on the minimum safety level for microlight aeroplanes must be established in investigation and prevention of Europe. The second report related to a Boeing 737 which was engaged in a accidents and incidents in civil go-around and experienced an undesirable loss of separation from another aviation. If a description of the Boeing 737 which had just started its take-off procedure from a converging page 10 events is suffi cient to learn runway at Amsterdam Airport Schiphol. The Board issued a recommendation lessons, the Board does not to Air Traffi c Control the Netherlands to no longer deviate from the basic conduct any further investigation. rule that clearance to take off should only be issued after the landing on the converging runway has actually been confi rmed by the runway controller. The Board’s activities are mainly aimed at preventing occurrences During the third quarter of 2020, a fatal accident occurred at the Gilze- in the future or limiting their Rijen airbase involving a glider. The Dutch Safety Board has initiated an consequences. If any structural investigation. In Germany, two Dutch gliders lost their lives after colliding safety short-comings are revealed, and crashing. The German authorities have launched an investigation, the Board may formulate recommendations to remove assisted by the Dutch Safety Board. In addition, a Dutch armed forces NH90 these. The Board’s investigations helicopter crashed in the Caribbean Sea, resulting in the loss of life of two explicitly exclude any culpability crew members. The Dutch Safety Board completed a preliminary report on or liability aspects. this occurrence and has recommended that the Defence Safety Inspectorate conducts a further investigation. Jeroen Dijsselbloem Chairman of the Dutch Safety Board page 8 Additional investigation into Loss of part of flap, Boeing 747-406F ER, Crashed, Drone DJI M210, port area Crashed after winch launch, Airprox, Piper PA-18-135, Socata TB-9, aircraft accident Faro (1992) Harare (Zimbabwe), 8 July 2019 Rotterdam Waalhaven, 4 July 2020 Rolladen-Schneider LS8-18, International Airport Teuge, 17 July 2020 Occurrences into Gilze-Rijen Air Base, 12 July 2020 At the request of the Dutch Minister of Infrastructure and During the final approach to Harare International Airport, The DJI Matrice 210 (M210) drone was deployed for a On base leg of the circuit, the two aeroplanes came into which an Water Management, the Dutch Safety Board launched the Dutch-registered aeroplane of a Dutch airline lost a fire brigade mission in the Waalhaven in Rotterdam, the After a premature cable release during the winch launch, each other’s vicinity, after which the pilot of the Piper a short additional investigation into the accident during part of the right-hand inboard fore flap. The pilots were objective of which was to use its cameras to monitor a the glider made a turn and crashed. The glider was made an evasive maneuver. the landing of a McDonnell Douglas DC-10-30F at Faro able to keep the aeroplane under control, and subse- fire on board a ship. After completing the mission, the completely destroyed. The pilot did not survive the crash. investigation has Airport in Portugal on 21 December 1992. The commer- quently landed safely. pilot started the drone’s return flight to the take-off and cial air transport aeroplane with 340 occupants made a landing location. At a distance of between 100 and 150 Classification: Serious incident hard landing, causing the right main landing gear to fail. Zimbabwe, the state of occurrence has delegated the metres from the dockside, the pilot initiated the drone’s Classification: Accident Reference: 2020058 been launched Subsequently, the right wing broke off from the fuselage. whole of the conducting of the investigation to the descent. After a few seconds, the horizontal flight of the Reference: 2020047 The aircraft left the runway and burst into flames. 56 of Netherlands, as the state of registry and state of the drone stopped suddenly, the drone entered a spin and it the occupants were killed. operator. The Dutch Safety Board has instituted an inves- crashed into the water, where it sank. tigation into the circumstances of the occurrence. At the time, the Portuguese investigation body inves- tigated the accident. The Board believes that a short Classification: Accident investigation will be able to provide answers to specific Classification: Serious incident Reference: 2020043 technical questions about the landing gear, which gave Reference: 2019060 rise to the call for the additional investigation. The Board aims to complete this investigation and publish as quickly as possible, but no later than the start of 2021. The right wing with the damaged inboard flap. (Source: Airline) The crashed LS8-18. DJI M210 drone. (Source: Skytools) 2 - Dutch Safety Board Quarterly Aviation Report 3rd quarter 2020 - 3 Hard landing, Alexander Schleicher Emergency landing after loss of engine Gear-up landing, Socata TB-20, Airprox, Cessna 208B, Reims Aviation Airprox, Rolladen-Schneider LS 4-b, Occurrences into ASK 21 B, Terlet glider airfield, power, Cessna A152 Aerobat, Groningen Airport Eelde, S.A. F172N, International Airport Teuge, Cessna 172P, Nistelrode glider airfield, which an investigation 17 July 2020 Veelerveen, 8 August 2020 14 August 2020 20 August 2020 22 August 2020 The glider made a hard landing, with the tail breaking off. The pilot experienced engine problems and subsequently The aeroplane, with an instructor and student on board, The F172N flew on final for Runway 26 when it was overta- During the winch launch of the glider, an aeroplane flew has been launched The occupants were unharmed. decided to perform an emergency landing in a field. made a gear-up landing, sustaining damage to the ken by a Cessna 208, which flew over the F172N and then over the glider airfield. The pilot in the glider released the During landing, the nose wheel broke off and the aero- propeller and underside of the fuselage. The occupants landed in front of it. The pilot of the F172N then made a winch cable to avoid a collision. Some time later the glider plane came to rest upside down. Both occupants were were unharmed. go-around. made a safe landing. Classification: Accident unharmed. Reference: 2020050 Classification: Accident Classification: Serious incident Classification: Serious incident Classification: Accident Reference: 2020056 Reference: 2020081 Reference: 2020061 Reference: 2020055 The TB-20 after the gear-up landing. (Source: GAE) The Cessna A152 after the emergency landing. (Source: Dutch Aviation Police) The ASK 21 B after the hard landing. (Source: Dutch Aviation Police) 4 - Dutch Safety Board Quarterly Aviation Report 3rd quarter 2020 - 5 Occurrences into Emergency landing, Prematurely released winch cable, Right main landing gear collapsed, Damaged during off-fi eld landing, Diamond DA40 TDI, Den Bommel, ASK-23, Soesterberg glider airfi eld, Occurrences abroad Fokker F27 MK50, Bardere (Somalia), Alexander Schleicher ASW24-e, which an investigation 19 September 2020 26 September 2020 5 July 2020 Kranenburg (Germany), 15 July 2020 The pilot experienced engine problems, which were The single-seater glider took off using the winch launch with Dutch Following the landing on the aerodrome of Bardere, the During an off-fi eld landing, the Dutch registered glider has been launched followed by a complete engine failure. He made an emer- method. At a low altitude, the winch cable released, aircraft taxied to the stand. During taxiing, the right main hit a ditch in the fi nal phase of the run-out. The glider was gency landing in a crop fi eld, which damaged the aircraft. after which the pilot fl ew straight ahead and made a landing gear collapsed. The aircraft sustained damage. damaged at the bottom of the nose. The Dutch pilot was safe landing. The winch cable caught under the left wing involvement into There were no injuries. unharmed. of a two-seater glider that just had landed. This glider Classifi cation: Accident sustained damage to the left wing. The occupants were The Somalian Aircraft Accident Investigation Branch has The German Federal Bureau of Aircraft Accident Reference: 2020064 unharmed. which an launched an investigation into the occurrence. The Dutch Investigation (BFU) has launched an investigation into Safety Board has offered its assistance. the occurrence. The Dutch Safety Board has offered its assistance. Classifi cation: Serious incident Reference: 2020067 investigation has Classifi cation: Serious incident Reference: 2020045 Classifi cation: Accident been launched by a Reference: 2020048 Defence Crashed, NH90 helicopter, Caribbean Sea, foreign authority Mid-air collision, Glaser-Dirks DG-300 19 July 2020 Elan, Rolladen-Schneider LS4-b, Dülmen (Germany), 11 July 2020 The Dutch Safety Board has launched an exploratory investigation into the accident with an NH90 helicopter in the Caribbean Sea, in which two crew members were Two gliders, registered in the Netherlands, collided with killed. The Dutch Safety Board was on site together with each other during cross country fl ights in Germany and the Defence Safety Inspectorate for this purpose. crashed. Both Dutch pilots were killed. The German Federal Bureau of Aircraft Accident Investigation (BFU) has launched an investigation into the The ASW24-e after the off-fi eld landing.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Quarterly Aviation Report
    Quarterly Aviation Report DUTCH SAFETY BOARD page 14 Investigations Within the Aviation sector, the Dutch Safety Board is required by law to investigate occurrences involving aircraft on or above Dutch territory. In addition, the Board has a statutory duty to investigate occurrences involving Dutch aircraft over open sea. Its October - December 2020 investigations are conducted in accordance with the Safety Board Kingdom Act and Regulation (EU) In this quarterly report, the Dutch Safety Board gives a brief review of the no. 996/2010 of the European past year. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of commercial Parliament and of the Council of flights in the Netherlands was 52% lower than in 2019. The Dutch Safety 20 October 2010 on the Board therefore received fewer reports. In 2020, 27 investigations were investigation and prevention of started into serious incidents and accidents in the Netherlands. In addition, accidents and incidents in civil the Dutch Safety Board opened an investigation into a serious incident aviation. If a description of the involving a Boeing 747 in Zimbabwe in 2019. The Civil Aviation Authority page 7 events is sufficient to learn of Zimbabwe has delegated the entire conduct of the investigation to the lessons, the Board does not Netherlands, where the aircraft is registered and the airline is located. In the conduct any further investigation. past year, the Dutch Safety Board has offered and/or provided assistance to foreign investigative bodies thirteen times in investigations involving Dutch The Board’s activities are mainly involvement. aimed at preventing occurrences in the future or limiting their In this quarterly report you can read, among other things, about an consequences.
    [Show full text]
  • Serving the Northern Netherlands Groningen Airport Eelde the Northern Netherlands: Groningen, Drenthe, Friesland
    Serving the Northern Netherlands Groningen Airport Eelde The Northern Netherlands: Groningen, Drenthe, Friesland 10% of Dutch population The Guardian: Groningen happiest city of Europe From Cow to Google Groningen Airport Eelde (GRQ) is the only airport in the densely- populated Benelux/ Northwest Germany region that does not overlap catchment areas with other airports. GRQ is not slot-constrained and has capacity for growth. Copenhagen 2019 2014 London Best in class in Diary; Milk reservoir of Europe Worldclass Research Institutes; Agribusiness Van Hall Larenstein and University of Groningen International trade Nobel prize winning research (nanotech) Life Science, Modern and innovative business cluster Health & Medical Largest University Hospital in the Netherlands (12,141 employees) Organ Transplantation Hotspot Technology Abundance of feedstock Large scale green energy Energy Transition development Power to gas (Hydrogen) and Biobased Green dataport Eemshaven (data center development) Chemicals Green energy supply; 600 MW Gemini Wind International fiber connections Home to the smartest production facilities in the world World class materials research (Zernike Institute) High tech industry Big data Fleet management & Crewing Maritime sector Specialty ship building Tourism Culture Sports Within 30 minutes – 575,000 inhabitants Within 45 minutes – 1,279,000 inhabitants Within 60 minutes – 2,079,000 inhabitants Major leakage effect Minor leakage effect Route potential from GRQ Leakage analysis results Currently Destination Name Upper range
    [Show full text]
  • Reference List Safety Approach Light Masts
    REFERENCE LIST SAFETY APPROACH LIGHT MASTS Updated: 24 April 2014 1 (10) AFRICA Angola Menongue Airport 2013 Benin Cotonou Airport 2000 Burkina Faso Bobo Diaulasso Airport 1999 Cameroon Douala Airport 1994, 2009 Garoua Airport 2001 Cap Verde Praia Airport 1999 Amilcar Capral Airport 2008 Equatorial Guinea Mongomeyen Airport 2010 Gabon Libreville Airport 1994 M’vengue Airport 2003 Ghana Takoradi Airport 2008 Accra Kotoka 2013 Guinea-Bissau Bissau Airport 2012 Ivory Coast Abidjan Airport 2002 Yamoussoukro Airport 2006 Kenya Laikipia Air Base 2010 Kisumu Airport 2011 Libya Tripoli Airport 2002 Benghazi Airport 2005 Madagasgar Antananarivo Airport 1994 Mahajanga Airport 2009 Mali Moptu Airport 2002 Bamako Airport 2004, 2010 Mauritius Rodrigues Airport 2002 SSR Int’l Airport 2011 Mauritius SSR 2012 Mozambique Airport in Mozambique 2008 Namibia Walvis Bay Airport 2005 Lüderitz Airport 2005 Republic of Congo Ollombo Airport 2007 Pointe Noire Airport 2007 Exel Composites Plc www.exelcomposites.com Muovilaaksontie 2 Tel. +358 20 754 1200 FI-82110 Heinävaara, Finland Fax +358 20 754 1330 This information is confidential unless otherwise stated REFERENCE LIST SAFETY APPROACH LIGHT MASTS Updated: 24 April 2014 2 (10) Brazzaville Airport 2008, 2010, 2013 Rwanda Kigali-Kamombe International Airport 2004 South Africa Kruger Mpumalanga Airport 2002 King Shaka Airport, Durban 2009 Lanseria Int’l Airport 2013 St. Helena Airport 2013 Sudan Merowe Airport 2007 Tansania Dar Es Salaam Airport 2009 Tunisia Tunis–Carthage International Airport 2011 ASIA China
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of the Traffic Distribution Rule on the Nature of Traffic Development at Lelystad Airport
    EFFECT OF THE TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION RULE ON THE NATURE OF TRAFFIC DEVELOPMENT AT LELYSTAD AIRPORT A study into market demand and dynamics following the opening of Lelystad Airport with a Traffic Distribution Rule (TDR) in place. CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 INTRODUCTION 7 2.1 Context 7 2.2 Objective of this study 7 2.3 Scope and limitations 8 APPROACH TO ESTIMATING TRAFFIC DEVELOPMENT 10 3.1 Logic used to determine traffic development 10 3.2 Methodology for determining traffic development at Lelystad Airport 11 3.3 Definition of autonomous versus non-autonomous traffic 11 FACTORS DRIVING TRAFFIC DEVELOPMENT 14 4.1 Demand outlook 14 4.2 Supply outlook 19 4.3 Airline market dynamics 26 TRAFFIC DEVELOPMENT SCENARIOS FOR LELYSTAD AIRPORT 38 5.1 Demand and supply balance in the Netherlands 38 5.2 Potential demand for slots at Lelystad Airport 39 5.3 Scenarios for slot allocation 41 OTHER FACTORS THAT COULD INFLUENCE TRAFFIC DEVELOPMENT 48 CONCLUSIONS 50 REFERENCES 52 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In this study, we have addressed the following question: “Can Lelystad Airport fulfil its targeted role of an overflow airport to Amsterdam Airport Schiphol (Schiphol) when the Traffic Distribution Rule (TDR) – supplemented by supportive measures if needed – is applied?” We conclude that Lelystad Airport will largely fulfil the role of an overflow airport, with an expected 10- 20% share of autonomous traffic in 2023 (at 10 thousand movements). This conclusion is based on the following two premises: 1. The share of autonomous traffic depends on how the EU Slot Regulation is specifically applied.
    [Show full text]
  • 2002 Statistical Annual Review (6.1 MB .Pdf)
    Statistical Annual Review 2002 2002 Statistical Annual Review 2002 Preface April, 2003 In the case of the 2002 Annual Statistical Review, we felt that we had to respond to changes in the way that information can be presented. Whereas in the past this review largely consisted of tables supplemented with brief analyses, now the analyses have been greatly expanded and the number of tables have been kept to a minimum. Furthermore, we have now opted for a clear classification of the topics. The tables that are no longer included in the report are available on our website www.schiphol.nl. If you require any further information, please feel free to contact the department mentioned below. Data from this publication may be published as long as the source is quoted. Published by Amsterdam Airport Schiphol P.O. Box 7501 1118 ZG Schiphol Amsterdam Airport Schiphol Airlines Marketing & Account Management Statistics & Forecasts Phone : 31 (20) 601 2664 Fax : 31 (20) 601 4195 E-mail : [email protected] 3 Contents 1 Summary of developments 2002 5 Table: Traffic and transport summary 9 2 Aircraft movements 11 Table: Air transport movements, monthly totals 2002 17 Table: Air transport movements, annual totals 1993 - 2002 17 Map: Origins and destinations Europe 18 Map: Origins and destinations intercontinental 19 3 Passenger transport 21 Table: Passenger transport, monthly totals 2002 25 Table: Passenger transport, annual totals 1993 - 2002 25 4 Cargo transport 27 Table: Cargo transport, monthly totals 2002 32 Table: Cargo transport, annual totals 1993 - 2002 32 Table: Mail transport, annual totals 1993 - 2002 33 5 Other Airports 35 Table: Air transport movements 41 Table: Passenger transport (transit-direct counted once) 41 Table: Cargo transport 42 Table: Dutch airports 43 6 Infrastructure 45 4 Statistical Annual Review 2002 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Airline Split Operadons
    Airline Split Opera-ons Dra final report October 16th, 2017 Confiden'al; for internal use only Execuve summary Key conclusions airline split operaons research Dra1 § The opening of Lelystad Airport may result in airlines operang from/to both Schiphol and Lelystad, serving the same catchment area, in a split operaon set up. This research describes what kind of airline split opera-on models exist and under which condions such operaon may or may not be sustainable. The basis for this research is an extensive analysis of flight schedules complemented with market developments. Client envisions a Traffic Distribu'on Rule (VVR) and requested to imply its implicaons. § The term ‘airline split operaons’ refers to network configuraons where an airline operates from its home base to mul'ple des'naons in the same catchment area or where an airline operates from another airport than its original home base in the same catchment area. The main types of split operaons are: ‘mul-airport’, ‘outside base’, ‘addional base’, and ‘second home base’. For the Dutch situaon the ‘second home base’ type is not relevant § All three relevant types of split opera-ons are being operated by airlines in the Dutch market for a long -me. From all regional airports in the Netherlands ‘outside base’ operaons are executed, while airlines have established ‘addional bases’ at Eindhoven and RoYerdam (partly due to the lack of development poten'al at Schiphol). Foreign airlines, mainly network carriers, but also low cost airlines, operate flights from their foreign home base to a second airport in the Netherlands next to Schiphol (‘mul+-airport’) or have done so in the past § The ‘Addi)onal base’ -type is well-suited for Lelystad from a market demand perspec've.
    [Show full text]
  • Aer Rodrom Me Meteo S Orologi Study Gr Ical Obs
    AMOFSG/9-IP/8 20/9/11 AERODROME METEOROLOGICAL OBSERVATION AND FORECAST STUDY GROUP (AMOFSG) NINTH MEETING Montréal, 26 to 30 September 2011 Agenda Item 5: Observing and forecasting at the aerodrome and in the terminal area 5.1: Observations AUTO METAR SYSTEM AT CIVIL AIRPORTS IN THE NETHERLANDS: DESCRIPTION AND EXPERIENCES (Presented by Jan Sondij) SUMMARY This paper provides an overview of the AUTO METAR system used in the Netherlands. The system includes the entire technical infrastructure used for the automated generation of all meteorological aeronautical observation reports including baack-up systems and procedures. It also includes the supervision of all issued reports by a remote meteorologist who can provide additional information to ATC. Experiences of the performance and acceptance by ATC of the AUTO METAR system are reported. The process of how this was achieved is presented as well as lessons learned. 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 The eighth meeting of the Aerodrome Meteorological Observation and Forecast Study Group (AMOFSG/8) led to the formation of an ad-hoc group tasked with reviewing the options for the future reporting of present weather in fully automated weather reports. More background on automated weather observations is provided in this information paper. 1.2 This information paper describes the so-called AUTO METAR system at civil airports in the Netherlands. The process of introduction and approval as well as experiences are presented. Some highlights are reported below. Details are given in the appended document entitled AUTO METAR System at Civil Airports in the Netherlands: Description and Experiences by Wauben and Sondij. (49 pages) AMOFSG.9.IP.008.5.en.docx AMOFSG/9-IP/8 - 2 - 1.3 Since 15 March 2011, the AUTO METAR system has been operational 24/7 at Rotterdam-The Hague Airport (EHRD).
    [Show full text]
  • Regie Op Knooppunten
    Regie op knooppunten Kennisinstituut voor Mobiliteitsbeleid Regie op Knooppunten Kennisinstituut voor Mobiliteitsbeleid Pauline Wortelboer- van Donselaar Peter Jorritsma Johan Visser December 2012 Analyses van mobiliteit en mobiliteitsbeleid. Dat is waar het Kennisinstituut voor Mobiliteitsbeleid (KiM) zich mee bezighoudt. Als zelfstandig instituut binnen het ministerie van I nfrastructuur en Milieu (IenM) maakt het KiM analyses van mobiliteit en mobiliteitsbeleid die doorwerken in de beleidsafwegingen. De inhoud van de publicaties van het KiM hoeft niet het standpunt van de minister en/ of de staatssecretaris van I enM weer te geven. Regie op Knooppunten Inhoud Samenvatting 5 1 I ntroductie 9 1.1 Aanleiding 9 1.2 Doel 10 1.3 Afbakening knooppunten 10 1.4 Leeswijzer 13 2 Terugblik op Nederlands knooppuntenbeleid 15 2.1 Mobiliteitsgericht knooppuntenbeleid 15 2.1.1 Goederenvervoerknooppunten 15 2.1.2 Personenvervoerknooppunten 17 2.2 Ruimtelijk knooppuntenbeleid 18 3 Rol en instrumenten van de rijksoverheid 23 3.1 Het publieke belang en knooppunten 23 3.1.1 Rijksrol wordt bepaald door het publieke belang 23 3.1.2 Het publieke belang van knooppunten 24 3.2 Rollen van het Rijk bij knooppunten 27 3.3 Rijksinstrumenten voor knooppunten 29 3.3.1 Toelichting op mogelijke instrumenten 29 3.3.2 Ideeën vanuit literatuur voor beleid op knooppunten 31 4 Rijksbeleid bij verschillende typen knooppunten 39 4.1 Personenvervoer knooppunten 39 4.1.1 Luchthavens 39 4.1.2 Spoorstation 46 4.1.3 Lightrail-/ov-terminal 53 4.2 Goederenvervoerknooppunten 58 4.2.1
    [Show full text]
  • De Economische Betekenis Van Groningen Airport Eelde Voor Noord-Nederland Volgens SEO Scenario’S
    De economische betekenis van Groningen Airport Eelde voor Noord-Nederland volgens SEO scenario’s Prof.dr. J.P. (Paul) Elhorst, Faculteit Economie & Bedrijfskunde, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen 1 5 November 2013 2 Inleiding en vraagstelling Sinds 2003 wordt Groningen Airport Eelde (GAE) geëxploiteerd door Groningen Airport Eelde NV met als aandeelhouders de provincies Groningen en Drenthe en de gemeenten Groningen, Assen en Tynaarlo. Blijkens verscheidene beleidsnota’s en ruimtelijk ordeningsplannen, beschouwen deze aandeelhouders de luchthaven als een essentiële infrastructurele basisvoorziening. Het publieke belang van GAE is gelegen in de bijdrage van de luchthaven aan de versterking van de ruimtelijk- economische structuur en een aantrekkelijk vestigingsklimaat in het Noorden. Na jarenlange gerechtelijke procedures heeft in het voorjaar van 2013 de in 2004 beoogde baanverlenging van 1800 naar 2500 meter plaatsgevonden. Oorspronkelijk had GAE zich ten doel gesteld om in 2015 een breakeven resultaat te bereiken. Nu de baanverlenging zoveel later tot stand is gekomen, verschuift dit punt automatisch naar de toekomst, omdat plannen daartoe nu pas ten uitvoer kunnen worden gebracht. Bovendien heeft de luchtvaartsector ondertussen niet stilgestaan. Er zijn meer en meer regio’s die het belang van een regionaal vliegveld inzien en daarom de ontwikkeling onderschrijven en ondersteunen. Bovendien wordt het afgelopen decennium gekenmerkt door een sterke opkomst van low cost carriers. Volgens recent onderzoek van SEO ― het betreft hier het onderzoek van Lieshout, Zuidberg en Veldhuis (2013) waarnaar hieronder zal worden verwezen middels het SEO onderzoek of SEO (2013) ― bereikt GAE het breakeven punt op zijn vroegst in 2023 en alleen onder gunstige veronderstellingen. Zij voorziet een exploitatietekort van 793 duizend euro in 2013 dat onder een gunstig scenario kan worden omgezet in een positief bedrijfsresultaat van 119 duizend euro in 2025, maar dat onder een gemiddeld of ongunstig groeiscenario blijft steken op een jaarlijks verlies van 171 tot 202 duizend euro.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.05 Edition 00.02.00 Demonstration Report RTO Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
    Project Number LSD.02.05 Edition 00.02.00 Demonstration Report RTO Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................... 7 1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................... 9 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE DOCUMENT ............................................................................................................... 9 1.2 INTENDED READERSHIP......................................................................................................................... 9 1.3 STRUCTURE OF THE DOCUMENT ........................................................................................................... 9 1.4 GLOSSARY OF TERMS ......................................................................................................................... 10 1.5 ACRONYMS AND TERMINOLOGY ......................................................................................................... 11 2 CONTEXT OF THE DEMONSTRATIONS ............................................................................................. 14 2.1 SCOPE OF THE DEMONSTRATION AND COMPLEMENTARITY WITH THE SESAR PROGRAMME .......... 14 3 PROGRAMME MANAGEMENT ............................................................................................................. 17 3.1 ORGANISATION...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Luchtvaart, 1E Kwartaal 2020
    Kwartaalmonitor Luchtvaart 01 e 1 kwartaal 2020 Het effect van de maatregelen om het coronavirus in te dammen is zichtbaar in de luchtvaartcijfers over het eerste kwartaal van 2020. Het aantal aangekomen en vertrokken passagiers op de vijf nationale luchthavens lag in het eerste kwartaal van 2020 ruim 20 procent lager dan een jaar eerder. Het totaalgewicht aan vervoerde goederen daalde met 9,6 procent en de omzetontwikkeling van dienstverlenende bedrijven binnen de luchtvaart daalde in het eerste kwartaal met 10,7 procent. Dit meldt het CBS op basis van nieuwe kwartaalcijfers. INHOUD Daling luchtvaartreizigers op nationale luchthavens 2 Aantal vliegtuigbewegingen en passagiers op Schiphol gedaald 3 Maastricht Aachen groeit als enige luchthaven 4 Passagiers van en naar de vijf Nederlandse luchthavens 5 Vervoerde luchtvracht in Amsterdam en Maastricht gedaald 6 Vervoerde luchtvracht naar Afrika sterkst gedaald in eerste kwartaal van 2020 7 Sterke daling omzet van luchtvaartmaatschappijen 8 Sterke afname aantal vliegtuig-bewegingen op kleine luchthavens 9 Vliegveld Ameland minste vliegtuig-bewegingen van de kleine luchthavens 10 Grootste daling aantal vliegtuig-bewegingen op Sint Eustatius 11 Grootste daling van aangekomen en vertrokken passagiers op Saba 12 Bronnen 13 Contact [email protected] Datum 29-06-2020 www.cbs.nl | Volg ons op Twitter, Facebook en Instagram @statistiekcbs Kwartaalmonitor Luchtvaart, eerste kwartaal 2020 02 Daling luchtvaartreizigers op nationale luchthavens Op de vijf nationale luchthavens, Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, Rotterdam The Hague Airport, Eindhoven Airport, Groningen Airport Eelde en Maastricht Aachen Airport, arriveerden en vertrokken in het eerste kwartaal van 2020 bijna 13,7 miljoen passagiers. Vergeleken met het eerste kwartaal van 2019 zijn dit 3,5 miljoen reizigers minder, een daling van 20,3 procent.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Aviation Report
    Quarterly Aviation Report DUTCH SAFETY BOARD page 5 Investigations Within the Aviation sector, the Dutch Safety Board is required by law to investigate occurrences involving aircraft on or above Dutch territory. In addition, the Board has a statutory duty to investigate occurrences involving Dutch aircraft over October - December 2018 open sea. Its investigations are conducted in accordance with the Safety Board Kingdom Act Those familiar with the aviation industry know that the Dutch Safety and Regulation (EU) no. 996/2010 Board investigates not only actual accidents, but that it also examines of the European Parliament and serious incidents that did not lead to an accident. The importance of such of the Council of 20 October investigation is self-evident, as it often leads to recommendations with an 2010 on the investigation and eye to further enhancing safety. It is for this reason that the Netherlands prevention of accidents and is indeed required, under the Chicago Convention, to investigate such incidents in civil aviation. If a incidents. page 9 description of the events is sufficient to learn lessons, the In this quarterly report, the Dutch Safety Board looks back at the serious Board does not conduct any incidents that occurred in 2018. Such investigations generally start with a further investigation. report from within the aviation industry, not necessarily because reporting incidents is mandatory, but because pilots and airlines are well aware of The Board’s activities are the vital importance of safety. In this respect, the aviation industry is clearly mainly aimed at preventing ahead of other industries in the Netherlands.
    [Show full text]