DOCSLIB.ORG

State Aviation Board Subj: 2020/2021 COAR Grant Proj

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
State Aviation Board Subj: 2020/2021 COAR Grant Proj Oregon Department of Aviation 3040 25th Street SE Salem, OR 97302-1125 Office: 503-378-4880 Fax: 503-373-1688 January 28, 2021 From: ODA Planning To: State Aviation Board Subj: 2020/2021 COAR Grant Projects The 2020/2021 grant cycle will be the 5th grant cycle since the Aviation System Action Program began and will be the largest award to date. The $2.5 million available for this year’s program is due in large part to the CARES Act of last spring (which provided the local matching share on AIP 2020 grants). Without it, the reduction in revenues due to the pandemic would have significantly reduced the amount of available funds for this worthwhile program. The Aviation Review Committee and staff are pleased to request board approval of $2.5 Million in COAR Grants for the 2020/2021 cycle. Summary: - The Aviation Review Committee recommends awarding all application in Priority 1 ($1,766,346). - The Aviation Review Committee recommends awarding all application in Priority 2. Staff is not recommending funding of Rogue Valley International –Medford’s $500,000 and recommends funding the remaining Priority 2 projects ($572,000). - The Aviation Review Committee recommends approving all application in Priority 3. Staff is not recommending approval of projects submitted by the Sisters Eagle Airport. Staff recommends awarding the remaining $161,653 in the following order – Non-NPIAS airports (8 with the exception of Sisters Eagle Airport) followed by the NPIAS airports (8). If funds become available (due to additional federal funding of the AIP grants local matching shard) awarding additional grants as described above. The 2020/2021 COAR Grant Cycle has completed the Aviation Review Committee (ARC) phase pursuant to ORS 319.020(3)(a) and (b). The department received the following numbers of applications and funding amounts: Number of Applications Total Requested ODA Funding Total Priority 1 21 $ 1,766,346.70 Total Priority 2 6 $ 1,072,000.00 Total Priority 3 21 $ 2,177,788.50 Total 48 $ 5,016,135.20 Oregon Department of Aviation’s mission is to provide infrastructure, financial resources, and expertise to ensure a safe and efficient air transport system Staff has provided the following appendices for your review. Application and Review Materials: Appendix A contains the recommended projects list for Priority I, II and III for the 2020/2021 COAR Grant Cycle. Appendix B contains all of the application material. In the material you will find: The applications, the internal review sheet and associated scoring and the Area Commissions on Transportation (ACT) grading sheets. Board members can also find all of the application material online at www.odae-grants.com. Appendix C provides background on the project for Medford’s FAA AIP Match and resiliency grant. Appendix D provides a background on the grant eligibility for the Sisters Eagle Air projects ARC Meeting, Discussion and Recommendation: The Aviation Review Committee met via ZOOM on January 13, 2021 pursuant to OAR 738-124- 0060. Staff provided program updates and information and then proceeded to discuss the applications. Discussion and Recommendation: Discussion on applications submitted in accordance with OAR-738-124-0035(8)(a)(A), “Priority 1”: The Aviation Review Committee first reviewed applications submitted in accordance with OAR- 738-124-0035(8)(a)(A), “Priority 1”. The Aviation Review Committee discussed the tie breaking for the following projects: COAR-2021-4S1-00046, Gold Beach Municipal Airport (4S1), Apron Reconstruction COAR-2021-6S2-00013, Florence Municipal Airport (6S2), AWOS Replacement The ARC recommended breaking the tie as follows: COAR-2021-6S2-00013 then COAR-2021- 4S1-00046. Application COAR-2021-6S2-00013 provides more local match than COAR-2021-4S1- 00046. There were two applications that scored negative points. COAR-2021-DLS-00068, Columbia Gorge Regional Airport, South Apron Rehabilitation: Phase I – Design COAR-2021-S03-00026, Ashland Municipal Airport, Parallel Taxiway Rehabilitation - Phase 1 The Aviation Review Committee found that during the review of the statutory considerations the above named projects were graded in error in two areas. The first error, found in both applications, was that the airport was providing 0-25% of the project funding through sources other than Connect Oregon or ODA funds. The accurate selection for both of these applications is 76-100% of funding outside Connect Oregon or ODA. The second grading error occurred in application COAR-2021-SO3-0026. The project readiness was marked as over 24 months, when according to the application it should have been 0-6 months. Had the errors not occurred, both applications would have received marks high enough for their ACT score to be positive. As a result, the Aviation Review Committee is recommending approval for those two projects. Aviation Review Committee Recommendation: The Aviation Review Committee recommended approval of all applications submitted in accordance with OAR-738-124-0035(8)(a)(A), “Priority 1” as listed in appendix A. Discussion on applications submitted in accordance with OAR-738-124-0035(8)(a)(B), “Priority 2”: The Aviation Review Committee first reviewed applications submitted in accordance with OAR- 738-124-0035(8)(a)(B), “Priority 2”. There were no ties. Aviation Review Committee Recommendation: The Aviation Review Committee recommended approval of all applications submitted in accordance with OAR-738-124-0035(8)(a)(B), “Priority 2” as listed in appendix A. Discussion on applications submitted in accordance with OAR-738-124-0035(8)(a)(C), “Priority 3”: The Aviation Review Committee first reviewed applications submitted in accordance with OAR- 738-124-0035(8)(a)(C), “Priority 3”. The Aviation Review Committee discussed the tie breaking for the following projects: Tie #1 COAR-2021-9S3-00014, Lakeside Airport, Lakeside Airport Fencing Project COAR-2021-BNO-00042, Burns Municipal Airport, Public Water Supply Well & Water Distribution System The ARC recommended breaking the tie and approving as follows: COAR-2021-9S3-00014 then COAR-2021-BNO-00042. Application COAR-2021-9S3-00014 was a Safety Project and the applicant only submitted one application. Tie #2 COAR-2021-LGD-00029, La Grande/Union County Airport, Fuel Recovery COAR-2021-6K5-00051, Sisters Eagle Airport, Infrastructure for Growth - Jet A Fuel Tank COAR-2021-BNO-00043, Burns Municipal Airport, Jet Fuel Storage Tank The ARC recommended breaking the tie and approving in the following order: COAR-2021-LGD- 00029, COAR-2021-6K5-00051 and COAR-2021-BNO-00043. The tie breaking was primarily based on percentage of the project funded as well as the overall project costs. The applicant for COAR-2021-LGD-00029 only had one application submitted, which was another factor in the tie breaking process. Tie #3 COAR-2021-AST-00030, Port of Astoria Regional Airport, Fuel Farm Generator and Transfer Switch COAR-2021-8S4-00022, Enterprise Municipal Airport- 8S4, Airport Safety Improvements Project The ARC recommended breaking the tie and approving as follows: COAR-2021-AST-00030 then COAR-2021-8S4-00022. Application COAR-2021-AST-00030 provided more match as a portion of percentage than COAR-2021-8S4-00022. Aviation Review Committee Recommendation: The Aviation Review Committee recommended approving all applications submitted in accordance with OAR-738-124-0035(8)(a)(C), “Priority 3” as listed in appendix A. Other action items from the Aviation Review Committee: In addition, it was determined by the Aviation Review Committee that the grading process specifically related to the quantitative questions needs to be reviewed. The Aviation Review Committee requested some additional details be provided in the COAR Instructions to Reviewers documentation that would further illustrate what the Oregon Administrative Rules provide. The Aviation Review Committee also asked staff to look into the overall grading process and develop recommendations for a new process. Staff provided options to the Aviation Review Committee as follows: - Option 1: Keep current process - Option 2: Each ARC member reviews all applications and an aggregate score is calculated as the final ACT Grade. In addition, all comments would or could be considered in the Aviation Review Committee meeting - Option 3: Cohorts of the ARC group would meet and grade the materials, providing more than one set of eyes to create substantive comments and thorough grading. One grade sheet would be completed with the cohort’s collective comments and final evaluation scores. Staff polled the Aviation Review Committee and the ARC overwhelmingly supported Option 3. Staff will be developing the process for creating the ARC Cohorts for review of applications submitted under the ASAP program. Additionally, staff will be revising the Instructions to Reviewers to support the ARC Cohort process and include some additional explanatory statements on review criteria as requested. Staff Discussion and Recommendations: Discussion on applications submitted in accordance with OAR-738-124-0035(8)(a)(A)-(C): Staff would like to specifically call out two projects for Staff report and detailed recommendation in addition to the ARC recommendations as further described below. There are two applications submitted for more than the typical $150,000. COAR-2021-MFR-00011 Rogue Valley International-Medford 2021 AIP Projects, submitted in accordance with OAR-738-124-0035(8)(a)(A), “Priority 1” for $176,079.50. COAR-2021-MFR-00012 Rogue Valley International-Medford 2021 Pavement Maintenance, in accordance with
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Individual Airport Reports
    Table of Contents – Individual Airport Reports Chapter 1 Introduction Chapter 2 2.1 Oregon Aviation Plan 2007 ( OAP 2007 ) Study Components 2.1.a State Aviation System Plan 2.1.b State Aviation Master Plan 2.1.c State Aviation Economic Impact Study 2.2 Overall Study Goals & Objectives 2.3 Airport Functional Roles 2.4 Performance Measures 2.5 Summary Chapter 3 3.1 General Airport Description and Location 3.2 Existing Airport Facilities 3.2.a Airside Facilities 3.2.b Landside Facilities 3.2.c Support Facilities 3.3 Current and Forecast Demand 3.3.a Forecasting Approach 3.4 Survey Responses 3.4.a Community Information 3.4.b Economic Development 3.4.c Airport Development and Use 3.4.d Air Shuttle 3.5 Summary Chapter 4 4.1 Airport Facility and Service Needs 4.1.a Recommendations Based on Performance Criteria 4.1.b General Observations and Recommendations 4.1.c Airport Capital Improvement Program 4.1.d Other Potential Improvements for Consideration 4.2 Definition of Airport System Role 4.3 Economic Impact Analysis 4.3.a Contribution of Airport to the Economy of Oregon Figures Chapter 3 3.1 Location Map Tables Chapter 2 2.1 Public-Use Airports in Oregon 2.2 OAP 2007 Recommended Airport Classification Chapter 3 3.1 Summary of Aviation Projections Chapter 4 4.1 Economic Contribution of Airport to the Oregon Economy Individual Airport Reports – Volume II Albany Municipal Airport Chehalem Airpark Alkali Lake State Airport Chiloquin State Airport Arlington Municipal Airport Christmas Valley Airport Ashland Municipal-Sumner Parker Field Columbia Gorge
    [Show full text]
  • (Asos) Implementation Plan
    AUTOMATED SURFACE OBSERVING SYSTEM (ASOS) IMPLEMENTATION PLAN VAISALA CEILOMETER - CL31 November 14, 2008 U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service / Office of Operational Systems/Observing Systems Branch National Weather Service / Office of Science and Technology/Development Branch Table of Contents Section Page Executive Summary............................................................................ iii 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................... 1 1.1 Background.......................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose................................................................................. 2 1.3 Scope.................................................................................... 2 1.4 Applicable Documents......................................................... 2 1.5 Points of Contact.................................................................. 4 2.0 Pre-Operational Implementation Activities ............................ 6 3.0 Operational Implementation Planning Activities ................... 6 3.1 Planning/Decision Activities ............................................... 7 3.2 Logistic Support Activities .................................................. 11 3.3 Configuration Management (CM) Activities....................... 12 3.4 Operational Support Activities ............................................ 12 4.0 Operational Implementation (OI) Activities .........................
    [Show full text]
  • CWACT) Executive Committee Thursday, April 11, 2019 4:00 – 5:00 Pm Oregon Cascades West, Albany Office
    Cascades West Area Commission on Transportation (CWACT) Executive Committee Thursday, April 11, 2019 4:00 – 5:00 pm Oregon Cascades West, Albany Office AGENDA 1. 4:00 Welcome and Introductions Chair Jaramillo 2. 4:05 Agenda Review Chair 3. 4:10 Approve Minutes from November 16, 2018 and Chair February 14, 2019 Meetings (Attachment A and B) ACTION: Approval of meeting minutes 4. 4:15 CWACT Membership Staff Full Commission Membership Approved by OCWCOG Board on March 21st. Private Sector Appointments TAC Membership Recruitment ACTION: Information Only 5. 4:30 April 25th CWACT Full Commission Agenda Review Staff ACTION: Discuss and provide approval for next meeting agenda items 6. 4:40 Other Business All 2018-2019 COAR Grant Project List Approved (Attachment C) ODOT Update on ADA Program ACTION: Information Only 7. 5:00 Adjournment Chair The Cascades West COG facilities are accessible to persons with disabilities. If you will need any special accommodations to attend the meeting contact Emma Chavez at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. She can be reached at 541-967-8551 (TTY/TTD 711) Attachment A Cascades West Area Commission on Transportation (CWACT) Executive Committee Thursday, November 16, 2018 Albany COG Office 1400 Queen Ave SE, Albany DRAFT MINUTES Attendance: John Huestis, Roger Nyquist, Annabelle Jaramillo, Bill Bain, Doug Hunt, and Barbara Bull Members Absent: Bob Elliott Alternates: James Feldman Staff Present: Phil Warnock, and Tarah Campi 1. Call to Order The Chair, Linn County Commissioner Roger Nyquist, called the meeting to order at 9:34 am. Introductions were conducted. 2. Agenda Review There were no changes to the agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • OREGON AVIATION PLAN Economic Impact Statement
    OREGON AVIATION PLAN Economic Impact Statement 2014 for NPIAS Airports Photo courtesy of City of Redmond Municipal Airport OREGON AVIATION PLAN Economic Impact Statement 2014 for NPIAS Airports The 2014 Oregon Aviation Plan Economic Impact Other modes of transportation cannot compete Study (2014 OAP EIS) is presented by the Oregon with aviation’s ability to move people and products Department of Aviation (ODA) and addresses the to where they are most needed safely, quickly and OVERVIEW economic contribution of aviation by Federal Avia- efficiently. Airports are a key component of the tion Administration (FAA) National Plan of Integrat- state’s infrastructure, allowing Oregon businesses ed Airport Systems (NPIAS) airports to the Oregon to do business at a global scale, creating econom- state economy, updating the most recent study, ic growth and opportunity that reaches far outside which was completed in 2007. the airport property. Airports are a key asset to Oregon commerce, Economic impacts of airports include on-airport providing transportation, employment and real economic activities, as well as spending off-airport estate for commercial and industrial develop- by visiting air travelers and those employed by ment, in addition to being infrastructure essential on-airport businesses. This executive summary to emergency response, medical evacuation, fire presents totals for the state and the five state protection and freight transport. NPIAS airports regions as defined by the Oregon Department of contribute more than $8.7 billion to the Oregon Transportation (ODOT). The economic impact of economy annually and provide Oregon businesses individual airport studies and the methodology and residents with just in time shipments of the used to complete the analysis are presented in the goods that keeping Oregon’s businesses moving.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Terms &Acronyms
    APPENDIX A: GLOSSARY OF TERMS & ACRONYMS NEWPORT MUNICIPAL AIRPORT Airport Master Plan Update Newport Municipal Airport Master Plan Update A-1 Appendix A DEFINITIONS ABOVE GROUND LEVEL. The elevation of a point or surface above the ground. ACCELERATE – STOP DISTANCE AVAILABLE (ASDA). See declared distances ADVISORY CIRCULAR. External publication issued by the FAA consisting of non-regulatory material providing for the recommendations relative to a policy, guidance and information relative to a specific aviation subject. AIR CARRIER. An operator, which: (1) performs at least five round trips per week between two or more points and publishes flight schedules which specifies the times, days of the week, and places between which such flights are performed; or (2) transport mail by air pursuant to a current contract with the U.S. Postal Service. Certified in accordance with Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Parts 121 and 127. AIR ROUTE TRAFFIC CONTROL CENTER (ARTCC). A facility established to provide air traffic control service to an aircraft operating on an IFR flight plan within controlled airspace and principally during the enroute phase of flight. AIR TAXI. An air carrier certificated in accordance with FAR Part 135 and authorized to provide, on demand, public transportation of persons and property by aircraft. Generally operates small aircraft for hire for specific trips. AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL FACILITIES (ATC-F). Electronic equipment and buildings aiding air traffic control (ATC) for communications, surveillance of aircraft including weather detection and advisory systems. AIRCRAFT. An aircraft is a device that is used or intended to be used for flight in the air. AIRCRAFT APPROACH CATEGORY.
    [Show full text]
  • Where Are Laanc Facilities in My Area?
    WHERE ARE LAANC FACILITIES IN MY AREA? Updated with LAANC Expansion Facilities! December 2019 Houston Air Route Traffic Control Center (ZHU) Brownsville/South Padre Island International Airport (BRO), Mobile Regional Airport (MOB), Salina Regional Airport (SLN), South Central Brownsville, TX Mobile, AL Salina, KS Easterwood Field (CLL), Baton Rouge Metropolitan Airport (BTR), Philip Billard Municipal Airport (TOP), College Station, TX Baton Rouge, LA Topeka, KS Conroe-North Houston Regional Airport (CXO), Lafayette Regional Airport (LFT), Mount Vernon Airport (MVN), Houston, TX Lafayette, LA Mt Vernon, IL Scholes International At Galveston Airport (GLS), Austin–Bergstrom International Airport (AUS), Quincy Regional Airport (UIN), Galveston, TX Austin, TX Quincy, IL Georgetown Municipal Airport (GTU), Corpus Christi International Airport (CRP), Chanute Martin Johnson Airport (CNU), Georgetown, TX Corpus Christi, TX Chanute, KS Valley International Airport (HRL), Aransas County Airport (RKP), Dodge City Regional Airport (DDC), Harlingen, TX Rockport, TX Dodge City, KS San Marcos Regional Airport (HYI), San Antonio International Airport (SAT), Emporia Municipal Airport (EMP), Austin, TX San Antonio, TX Emporia, KS Laredo International Airport (LRD), Louis Armstrong New Orleans International Airport (MSY), Hays Regional Airport (HYS), Laredo, TX Kenner, LA St, Hays, KS McAllen Miller International Airport (MFE), William P. Hobby Airport (HOU), Lawrence Municipal Airport (LWC), McAllen, TX Houston, TX Lawrence, KS Sugar Land Regional Airport
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3, Forecast
    3. FORECAST OF AVIATION DEMAND Forecasts of aviation activity are used to identify expected activity levels and based aircraft at individual airports in the system. A statewide perspective on aviation activity also affords the opportunity to examine the context for changes at Oregon airports. Where individual master plans or Airport Layout Plans (ALPs) look in detail at the local situation, the system plan offers the view from 30,000 feet. This makes it possible to look at regional and statewide trends that are resulting not only in absolute gains or declines at particular airports, but also changes that come from redistribution of activity. The last system plan forecasts had a base year of 2005. This forecast starts with the base year of 20151 and estimates changes in the next 20 years from 2015 through 2035. The following components of aviation activity are considered in the forecasts: • Commercial airline enplanements • General aviation based aircraft • Total commercial, general aviation, and military operations This chapter also includes a discussion of national and regional factors that are impacting aviation activity in Oregon as well as changes in the drivers of aviation demand at the State level that could impact forecasts. 3.1 Scope of Aviation Activity in Oregon – Overview Seven commercial service airports and 90 general aviation airports comprise the Oregon system. Oregon’s economy reflects a rich diversity of economic activity in the state that includes both high tech and natural and agricultural resource industries. During the past three decades, Oregon made the transition from a resource- based economy to a more mixed manufacturing and marketing economy, with an emphasis on high technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Manager Company Name Address 1 City, State & Zip Phone
    Airport Manager Company Name Address 1 City, State & Zip Phone Manager's E-mail Sponsor Airport # City County Web Site City-Owned Albany Municipal Airport. Jon Goldman City of Albany PO Box 490 Albany, OR 97321 541-917-7605 [email protected] City S12 Albany Linn http://cityofalbany.net Arlington Municipal Airport Pam Rosenbalm City of Arlington PO Box 68 Arlington, OR 97812 541-454-2743 [email protected] City 1S8 Arlington Gilliam Ashland Municipal Airport - Sumner Parker Fld Scott Fleury City of Ashland 20 E Main St. Ashland, OR 97520 541-552-2416 [email protected] City S03 Ashland Jackson http://www.ashland.or.us Baker City Municipal Airport Mike Kee Baker City PO Box 650 Baker City, OR 97814 541-524-2040 [email protected] Bend Municipal Airport Gary Judd City of Bend PO Box 431 Bend, OR 97709 541-389-0258 [email protected] City Bend www.ci.bend.or.us Burns Municipal Airport Dauna Wensenk City of Burns 242 S. Broadway Street Burns, OR 97720 541-573-5255 [email protected] City KBNO Burns Harney http://www.ci.burns.or.us Columbia Gorge Regional Airport Chuck Covert Aeronautical Management, Inc PO Box 285 Dallesport, Washington 98617 509-767-2272 [email protected] City KDLS The Dalles Wasco http://www.ci.the-dalles.or.us Corvallis Municipal Airport Lisa Scherf City of Corvallis PO Box 1083 Corvallis, OR 97339 541-766-6916 [email protected] City KCVO Corvallis Benton http://www.ci.corvallis.or.us Creswell Hobby Field Airport Shelley Humble City of Creswell P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • COAR 2018 Project List.Xlsx
    2017‐2018 COAR Grant Cycle Aviation Review Committee (ARC) Recommended Rankings Amount ARC Recommended Requested from Ranking Airport Name Project Name Match ODA Total Project Cost Priority I Projects: 1 Ontario Municipal Airport Ontario Airport Project AIP 14‐2018 $229,522 $22,700 $252,222 2 Baker City Municipal South Apron Reconstruction Project $1,516,650 $150,000 $1,666,650 3 Grant County Regional Airport FAA Match for GCRA Reconstruct Aprons: Phase I $475,222 $47,000 $522,222 4 Hobby Field AIP Match Taxilane Improvements $1,046,500 $103,500 $1,150,000 5 Florence Municipal Runway/Taxiway Seal Coat and Lighting Project $1,041,445 $103,000 $1,144,445 6 Gold Beach Municipal Airport AIP Match for Replace Rotating Beacon and Install PAPI $232,000 $23,555 $255,555 7 Tillamook Airport TMK‐ FAA Match_COAR 2018 $546,000 $54,000 $600,000 8 Albany Municipal Airport Taxi‐way connector realignment, apron rehab $1,305,850 $129,150 $1,435,000 9 McMinnville Municipal Airport Pavement Rehabilitation Phase I ‐ Environmental/Design $493,333 $40,000 $533,333 10 Madras Municipal Airport Rehabilitate Parallel Taxiway (Construction) $2,577,778 $150,000 $2,727,778 11 Newport Municipal Airport FAA AIP‐25 grant matching funds for Predesign for Storm Pipe Rehabilitation and slope repair environmental $233,400 $18,924 $252,324 12 Prineville/Crook County Airport Aircraft Apron Joint Use Facility Design and Construction $758,333 $75,000 $833,333 13 Hermiston Municipal Airport Apron Rehab/RPZ Land Acquisition/Road Relocation‐Environmental $252,777 $25,000 $277,777 14 Scappoose Industrial Airpark Future AIP Match ‐ Phase III Taxiway Relocation Construction.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix E: OREGON AVIATION PLAN (2007/14)
    Appendix E: OREGON AVIATION PLAN (2007/14) La Grande / Union County Airport Airport Master Plan Update La Grand/Union County Airport – Individual Airport Report Chapter 1 Introduction The state of Oregon has an extensive aviation system spread throughout the state, providing valuable transportation options for the public which range from small emergency use airports in remote regions to the extensive passenger enplanements at Portland International. Managing such a large and diverse system of airports can be a daunting task if a comprehensive plan isn’t in place to serve as a guide. In addition, with the ever increasing demands for project funding, it is imperative that the Oregon Department of Aviation (ODA) have a solid inventory, understanding of need, and plan for development for the entire state aviation system to meet the needs of existing and future development. This report is a combination of three studies which will guide the development of the aviation system in Oregon for years to come. This document is organized into three distinct sections. Chapter Two summarizes the overall study goals, roles, and methodologies used to develop the study. Chapter Three is a summary of the various inventory efforts associated with the individual airport facilities. Chapter Four contains specific roles, recommendations, and funding options for the airport. This report will provide each community with information which can guide the development of each facility in an orderly, economic, and environmentally friendly manner. Oregon Department of Aviation (Final Document February 2008) Page 1 of 34 La Grand/Union County Airport – Individual Airport Report This Page Intentionally Left Blank Oregon Department of Aviation (Final Document February 2008) Page 2 of 34 La Grand/Union County Airport – Individual Airport Report Chapter 2 The growing aviation demand in Oregon has prompted the Oregon Department of Aviation (ODA) to update the previous State Aviation System Plan published in 2000 and develop economic impact assessments that gauge the benefits of aviation to the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Albany Municipal Airport | Airport Master Plan City of Albany
    Cascades West Area Commission on Transportation Technical Advisory Committee Wednesday, November 9, 2016 1:30 pm – 3:00pm OCWCOG Offices Albany AGENDA 1. 1:30 Introductions and Agenda Review Chair Gescher 2. 1:35 Approval of April 13, 2016 Meeting Minutes Chair Gescher Action: Approval of Minutes (Attachment I) 3. 1:40 Public Comment Chair Gescher This is an opportunity for members of the public to comment on the activities/agenda of the Technical Advisory Committee. 4. 1:45 Review of Aviation Grant Applications Chair Gescher There are two Aviation System Action Program (ASAP) grants in the CWACT area; they are from the City of Newport and the City of Albany. TAC members will evaluate these proposals and collectively complete one Review Form for each application for consideration of the CWACT Executive Committee and Full Commission. (Attachment II – Review Form) (Attachment III – City of Newport Application) (Attachment IV – City of Albany Application) 5. 3:00 Adjournment The Cascades West COG facilities are accessible to persons with disabilities. If you will need any special accommodations to attend the meeting contact Emma Chavez at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. She can be reached at 541-967-8551. TTY/TTD 711 ATTACHMENT 1 DRAFT MINUTES Cascades West Area Commission on Transportation Technical Committee Meeting Wednesday, April 13, 2016 Cascades West Center, Albany Oregon Attendees: Ali Bonakdar, Chuck Knoll, Derrick Tokos, Greg Gescher, Joe Graybill, Josh Wheeler, Pam Barlow-Lind, Rob Emmons, Ron Irish, Roy Kinion, Theresa Conley, and Dan Fricke (for Valerie Grigg Devis) Guests: Bud Shoemake, Aja Vickers, Brian Latta, Paul Langner, Jeff Gaines, Lance Vanderbeck, Kevin Greenwood, Doug Cooper, Lisa Scherf, and Dan Mason Staff: Phil Warnock, Tarah Campi, and Emma Chavez 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Cargo Airports Frequency Firefighting Medevac Albany No
    Airport Cargo airports frequency Firefighting Medevac Albany no transient medevac Alkali Lake no transient medevac Arlington no drone operating base transient medevac weather alternate for Ashland Medford occassional based Brim Aviation helo medevac Astoria Ameriflight (UPS) daily Coast Guard based SAR/medevac Aurora no transient medevac Baker City no summmer firefighting transient medevac Bandon no transient medevac Beaver Marsh no transient medevac weather alternate for Bend Redmond occassional transient medevac Boardman no transient medevac Brookings no cal/or lifeflight based at airport transient medevac Burns transient medevac Cape Blanco no transient medevac Cascade Locks no transient medevac Chehalem no transient medevac Chiloquin no seasonal firefighting transient medevac Christmas Valley no seasonal firefighting transient medevac Condon no transient medevac Corvallis FEDEX/Ameriflight (UPS) daily transient medevac Cottage Grove no transient medevac Country Squire no transient medevac Crescent Lake no transient medevac Creswell no based Fire Spotting service transient medevac Dalles no Seasonal firefighting base based fixed wing and helo medevac Davis (Gates) no transient medevac Enterprise no transient medevac Eugene FEDEX/Ameriflight (UPS) daily Florence Ameriflight (UPS) daily transient medevac George Felt no Gold Beach no transient medevac Grants Pass no transient medevac Hermiston Ameriflight (UPS) daily transient medevac Hillsboro no transient medevac Hood River no transient medevac Illinois Valley no transient medevac Independence
    [Show full text]