DOCSLIB.ORG

IAEA SAFEGUARDS GLOSSARY 2001 Edition

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

IAEA SAFEGUARDS GLOSSARY 2001 Edition INTERNATIONAL NUCLEAR VERIFICATION SERIES No. 3 IAEA SAFEGUARDS GLOSSARY 2001 Edition The following States are Members of the International Atomic Energy Agency: AFGHANISTAN GHANA PANAMA ALBANIA GREECE PARAGUAY ALGERIA GUATEMALA PERU ANGOLA HAITI PHILIPPINES ARGENTINA HOLY SEE POLAND ARMENIA HUNGARY PORTUGAL AUSTRALIA ICELAND QATAR AUSTRIA INDIA REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AZERBAIJAN INDONESIA ROMANIA BANGLADESH IRAN, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION BELARUS IRAQ SAUDI ARABIA BELGIUM IRELAND SENEGAL BENIN ISRAEL SIERRA LEONE BOLIVIA ITALY SINGAPORE BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA JAMAICA SLOVAKIA BOTSWANA JAPAN SLOVENIA BRAZIL JORDAN SOUTH AFRICA BULGARIA KAZAKHSTAN SPAIN BURKINA FASO KENYA SRI LANKA CAMBODIA KOREA, REPUBLIC OF SUDAN CAMEROON KUWAIT SWEDEN CANADA LATVIA SWITZERLAND CENTRAL AFRICAN LEBANON SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC REPUBLIC LIBERIA TAJIKISTAN CHILE LIBYAN ARAB JAMAHIRIYA THAILAND CHINA LIECHTENSTEIN THE FORMER YUGOSLAV COLOMBIA LITHUANIA REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA COSTA RICA LUXEMBOURG TUNISIA CÔTE D’IVOIRE MADAGASCAR TURKEY CROATIA MALAYSIA UGANDA CUBA MALI UKRAINE CYPRUS MALTA UNITED ARAB EMIRATES CZECH REPUBLIC MARSHALL ISLANDS UNITED KINGDOM OF DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC MAURITIUS GREAT BRITAIN AND OF THE CONGO MEXICO NORTHERN IRELAND DENMARK MONACO UNITED REPUBLIC DOMINICAN REPUBLIC MONGOLIA OF TANZANIA ECUADOR MOROCCO UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EGYPT MYANMAR URUGUAY EL SALVADOR NAMIBIA UZBEKISTAN ESTONIA NETHERLANDS VENEZUELA ETHIOPIA NEW ZEALAND VIET NAM FINLAND NICARAGUA YEMEN FRANCE NIGER YUGOSLAVIA, GABON NIGERIA FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GEORGIA NORWAY ZAMBIA GERMANY PAKISTAN ZIMBABWE The Agency’s Statute was approved on 23 October 1956 by the Conference on the Statute of the IAEA held at United Nations Headquarters, New York; it entered into force on 29 July 1957. The Headquarters of the Agency are situated in Vienna. Its principal objective is “to accelerate and enlarge the contribution of atomic energy to peace, health and prosperity throughout the world’’. © IAEA, 2002 Permission to reproduce or translate the information contained in this publication may be obtained by writing to the International Atomic Energy Agency, Wagramer Strasse 5, P.O. Box 100, A-1400 Vienna, Austria. Printed by the IAEA in Austria June 2002 IAEA/NVS/3 INTERNATIONAL NUCLEAR VERIFICATION SERIES No. 3 IAEA SAFEGUARDS GLOSSARY 2001 Edition INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY VIENNA, 2002 VIC Library Cataloguing in Publication Data IAEA safeguards glossary. — 2001 ed. — Vienna : International Atomic Energy Agency, 2002. p. ; 24 cm. — (International nuclear verification series, ISSN 1020–6205 ; no. 3) IAEA/NVS/3 ISBN 92–0–111902–X Includes bibliographical references. 1. Nuclear energy — Security measures — Terminology. I. International Atomic Energy Agency. II. Series. VICL 02–00288 FOREWORD IAEA safeguards have evolved since their inception in the late 1960s. In 1980 the IAEA published the first IAEA Safeguards Glossary (IAEA/SG/INF/1) with the aim of facilitating understanding of the specialized safeguards terminology within the international community. In 1987 the IAEA published a revised edition of the Glossary (IAEA/SG/INF/1 (Rev.1)) which took into account developments in the safeguards area as well as comments received since the first edition appeared. Since 1987, IAEA safeguards have become more effective and efficient, mainly through the series of strengthening measures approved by the IAEA Board of Governors during 1992–1997, the Board’s approval, in 1997, of the Model Protocol Additional to the Agreement(s) between State(s) and the International Atomic Energy Agency for the Application of Safeguards (issued as INFCIRC/540 (Corrected)), and the work, begun in 1999, directed towards the development and implementation of integrated safeguards. The IAEA Safeguards Glossary 2001 Edition reflects these developments. Each of the 13 sections of the Glossary addresses a specific subject related to IAEA safeguards. To facilitate understanding, definitions and, where applicable, explanations have been given for each of the terms listed. The terms defined and explained intentionally have not been arranged in alphabetical order, but their sequence within each section corresponds to the internal relationships of the subject treated. The terms are numbered consecutively within each section and an index referring to these numbers has been provided for ease of reference. The terms used have been translated into the official languages of the IAEA, as well as into German and Japanese. The IAEA Safeguards Glossary 2001 Edition has no legal status and is not intended to serve as a basis for adjudicating on problems of definition such as might arise during the negotiation or in the interpretation of safeguards agreements or additional protocols. The IAEA Safeguards Glossary 2001 Edition appears as a publication in the International Nuclear Verification Series. Other publications appearing in this series are as follows: IAEA/NVS/1 Safeguards Techniques and Equipment (1997) IAEA/NVS/2 The Evolution of IAEA Safeguards (1998). NOTE ON THE IAEA DOCUMENTS REFERRED TO IN THE GLOSSARY [ST] Statute of the International Atomic Energy Agency, 1956. [9] INFCIRC/9/Rev. 2. Agreement on the Privileges and Immunities of the IAEA, 1967. [39] GC(V)/INF/39. The Agency’s Inspectorate, 1961. [66] INFCIRC/66/Rev. 2. The Agency’s Safeguards System (1965, as Provisionally Extended in 1966 and 1968), 1968. [140] INFCIRC/140. Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, 1970. [153] INFCIRC/153 (Corrected). The Structure and Content of Agreements between the Agency and States Required in Connection with the Treaty on the Non- Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, 1972. [179] GOV/INF/179. The Treaty for the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons in Latin America and the Caribbean, 1967 (Tlatelolco Treaty). [207] INFCIRC/207. Notification to the Agency of Exports and Imports of Nuclear Material (USSR, UK, USA), 1974. [209] INFCIRC/209/Rev. 2. Communications of 15 November 1999 Received from Member States Regarding the Export of Nuclear Material and of Certain Categories of Equipment and Other Material, 2000. [225] INFCIRC/225/Rev. 4 (Corrected). The Physical Protection of Nuclear Material and Nuclear Facilities, 1999. [254] INFCIRC/254/Rev. 4/Part 1. Communications Received from Certain Member States Regarding Guidelines for the Export of Nuclear Material, Equipment and Technology, 2000; INFCIRC/254/Rev. 4/Part 2. Communications Received from Certain Member States Regarding Guidelines for Transfers of Nuclear-Related Dual-Use Equipment, Materials, Software and Related Technology, 2000. [267] INFCIRC/267. The Revised Guiding Principles and General Operating Rules to Govern the Provision of Technical Assistance by the Agency, 1979. [274] INFCIRC/274/Rev. 1. Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material, 1980. [322] INFCIRC/322. Communication Received from the Resident Representative of Italy on Behalf of the European Community, 1985. [331] INFCIRC/331/Add.1. South Pacific Nuclear Free Zone Treaty, 1987 (Rarotonga Treaty). [395] INFCIRC/395. Agreement between the Republic of Argentina and the Federative Republic of Brazil for the Exclusively Peaceful Use of Nuclear Energy, 1992 (Guadalajara Declaration). [411] INFCIRC/411. Amendments to the Treaty for the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons in Latin America, 1993. [512] INFCIRC/512. The Text of the Cairo Declaration Adopted on the Occasion of the Signing of the African Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone Treaty, 1996 (Treaty of Pelindaba). [540] INFCIRC/540 (Corrected). Model Protocol Additional to the Agreement(s) between State(s) and the International Atomic Energy Agency for the Application of Safeguards, 1997. [548] INFCIRC/548. Communication Received from the Permanent Mission of Thailand Regarding the Treaty on the Southeast Asia Nuclear Weapon-Free Zone, 1998 (Treaty of Bangkok). [549] INFCIRC/549. Communication Received from Certain Member States Concerning Their Policies Regarding the Management of Plutonium, 1998. [SCT] IAEA/SG/SCT/5. Statistical Concepts and Techniques for IAEA Safeguards, Fifth Edition, 1998. [STR-327] International Target Values 2000 for Measurement Uncertainties in Safeguarding Nuclear Material, 2000, Safeguards Technical Report. [IAEA/NVS/1] Safeguards Techniques and Equipment, 1997. [IAEA/NVS/2] The Evolution of IAEA Safeguards, 1998. CONTENTS 1. LEGAL INSTRUMENTS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS RELATED TO IAEA SAFEGUARDS . 1 2. IAEA SAFEGUARDS: PURPOSE, OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE . 13 3. SAFEGUARDS APPROACHES, CONCEPTS AND MEASURES . 19 4. NUCLEAR AND NON-NUCLEAR MATERIAL . 30 5. NUCLEAR AND NUCLEAR RELATED ACTIVITIES AND INSTALLATIONS . 37 6. NUCLEAR MATERIAL ACCOUNTANCY . 45 7. NUCLEAR MATERIAL MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES AND EQUIPMENT . 58 8. CONTAINMENT, SURVEILLANCE AND MONITORING . 66 9. ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLING . 72 10. STATISTICAL CONCEPTS AND TECHNIQUES FOR NUCLEAR MATERIAL VERIFICATION . 76 11. VISITS, INSPECTIONS AND COMPLEMENTARY ACCESS . 84 12. SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION AND EVALUATION . 94 13. REPORTING ON SAFEGUARDS IMPLEMENTATION . 101 TRANSLATIONS OF TERMS . 105 INDEX . 193 1. LEGAL INSTRUMENTS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS RELATED TO IAEA SAFEGUARDS Safeguards applied by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) are an important element of the global nuclear non-proliferation regime. This section provides information on legal instruments and other documents in the area of nuclear non-proliferation that establish the bases of the IAEA safeguards system or are otherwise closely linked to the application
Recommended publications

  • Evolution of the Product Space and a New Proposal

    EVOLUTION OF THE PRODUCT SPACE AND A NEW PROPOSAL FOR TURKEY’S EXPORT INCENTIVE SYSTEM OF THE PRODUCT SPACE EVOLUTION EVOLUTION OF THE PRODUCT SPACE AND A NEW PROPOSAL FOR TURKEY’S EXPORT INCENTIVE SYSTEM 768 759 736 737 .tr 755 431 620 728 v 622 407 623 606 607 149 748 764 462 621 625 713 o 632 619 154 767 750 649 618 409 715 758 309 459 517 689 717 735 646 648 653 143 664 752 386 747 497 645 613 647 403 457 615 633 630 396 585 628 612 515 608 204 458 642 357 397 144 662 616 644 554 663 712 .sbb.g 513 617 400 762 766 46 421 629 402 643 w 417 390 751 652 631 761 398 710 520 126 412 540 654 401 410 395 716 720 391 239 708 627 498 121 685 711 703 641 650 256 359 120 383 763 415 371 ww 774 241 704 315 320 80 702 592 624 151 452 249 705 701 240 424 706 734 638 155 456 388 509 399 427 351 756 611 634 700 519 657 454 697 709 635 559 148 698 753 66 426 444 745 147 731 521 692 651 558 423 694 312 416 602 81 695 699 524 157 36 392 358 422 723 729 60 54 746 508 406 85 209 690 730 605 345 86 610 523 437 688 696 205 356 573 434 514 707 203 64 442 510 255 455 348 420 350 77 30 555 570 291 361 404 393 394 201 535 460 73 389 343 118 556 156 347 639 116 71 346 26 757 577 448 575 760 614 687 296 693 362129 349 145 65 586 669 342 772 25 574 3 355 344 101 539 224 353 405 714 79 461 564 438 259 182 742 600 329 289 170 482 372 317 674 518 50 31 557 512 670 70 88 593 661 10 56 471 146 130 691 680 321 52 516 732 326 214 479 413 686 445 579 352 55 199 228 626 484 102 29 576 83 316 583 447 104 215 159 235 322 451 136 572 328 360 604 494 446 449 430 103 542 63
  • Nuclear Energy: Fission and Fusion

    Nuclear Energy: Fission and Fusion

    CHAPTER 5 NUCLEAR ENERGY: FISSION AND FUSION Many of the technologies that will help us to meet the new air quality standards in America can also help to address climate change. President Bill Clinton 1 Two distinct processes involving the nuclei of atoms can be harnessed, in principle, for energy production: fission—the splitting of a nucleus—and fusion—the joining together of two nuclei. For any given mass or volume of fuel, nuclear processes generate more energy than can be produced through any other fuel-based approach. Another attractive feature of these energy-producing reactions is that they do not produce greenhouse gases (GHG) or other forms of air pollution directly. In the case of nuclear fission—a mature though controversial energy technology—electricity is generated from the energy released when heavy nuclei break apart. In the case of nuclear fusion, much work remains in the quest to sustain the fusion reactions and then to design and build practical fusion power plants. Fusion’s fuel is abundant, namely, light atoms such as the isotopes of hydrogen, and essentially limitless. The most optimistic timetable for fusion development is half a century, because of the extraordinary scientific and engineering challenges involved, but fusion’s benefits are so globally attractive that fusion R&D is an important component of today’s energy R&D portfolio internationally. Fission power currently provides about 17 percent of the world’s electric power. As of December 1996, 442 nuclear power reactors were operating in 30 countries, and 36 more plants were under construction. If fossil plants were used to produce the amount of electricity generated by these nuclear plants, more than an additional 300 million metric tons of carbon would be emitted each year.
  • The Nuclear Safeguards Regulations 20

    The Nuclear Safeguards Regulations 20

    Draft Regulations laid before Parliament under sections 113(2)(a) and (aa) of the Energy Act 2013 and section 2(5) of the Nuclear Safeguards Act 2018, for approval by resolution of each House of Parliament. DRAFT STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 20-- No. ENERGY The Nuclear Safeguards Regulations 20-- Made - - - - *** Coming into force - - *** The Secretary of State, in exercise of the powers conferred by sections 74(3), 75, 76, 76A(1)(a) and (b), 76A(2), 76A(3), 76A(6), 113(7), of and paragraphs 2 to 16 of Schedule 2 to the Energy Act 2013(a) and by sections 2(1) and (3) of the Nuclear Safeguards Act 2018, makes the following Regulations: In accordance with section 113(2)(a) and (aa) of the Energy Act and with section 2(5) of the Nuclear Safeguards Act 2018, a draft of these Regulations has been laid before Parliament and approved by a resolution of each House of Parliament. CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Citation and commencement 1.—(1) These Regulations may be cited as the Nuclear Safeguards Regulations 20--. (2) Subject to paragraph (3), these Regulations come into force on **** 20--. (3) Regulations [ ] come into force on [ ]. Interpretation 2. In these Regulations— “Additional Protocol” means the Protocol dated [ ], entered into between the United Kingdom and the Agency which is additional to the Agreement with the Agency; “adjustment” means an entry made in an accounting record or a report, which is required by these Regulations, and which shows a shipper/receiver difference or material unaccounted for; “Agency” means the International Atomic Energy Agency; (a) 2013 c.32.
  • NUREG-1350, Vol. 31, Information

    NUREG-1350, Vol. 31, Information

    NRC Figure 31. Moisture Density Guage Bioshield Gauge Surface Detectors Depth Radiation Source GLOSSARY 159 GLOSSARY Glossary (Abbreviations, Definitions, and Illustrations) Advanced reactors Reactors that differ from today’s reactors primarily by their use of inert gases, molten salt mixtures, or liquid metals to cool the reactor core. Advanced reactors can also consider fuel materials and designs that differ radically from today’s enriched-uranium dioxide pellets within zirconium cladding. Agreement State A U.S. State that has signed an agreement with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) authorizing the State to regulate certain uses of radioactive materials within the State. Atomic energy The energy that is released through a nuclear reaction or radioactive decay process. One kind of nuclear reaction is fission, which occurs in a nuclear reactor and releases energy, usually in the form of heat and radiation. In a nuclear power plant, this heat is used to boil water to produce steam that can be used to drive large turbines. The turbines drive generators to produce electrical power. NUCLEUS FRAGMENT Nuclear Reaction NUCLEUS NEW NEUTRON NEUTRON Background radiation The natural radiation that is always present in the environment. It includes cosmic radiation that comes from the sun and stars, terrestrial radiation that comes from the Earth, and internal radiation that exists in all living things and enters organisms by ingestion or inhalation. The typical average individual exposure in the United States from natural background sources is about 310 millirem (3.1 millisievert) per year. 160 8 GLOSSARY 8 Boiling-water reactor (BWR) A nuclear reactor in which water is boiled using heat released from fission.
  • Pakistan's Nuclear Weapons

    Pakistan's Nuclear Weapons

    Pakistan’s Nuclear Weapons Paul K. Kerr Analyst in Nonproliferation Mary Beth Nikitin Specialist in Nonproliferation August 1, 2016 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL34248 Pakistan’s Nuclear Weapons Summary Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal probably consists of approximately 110-130 nuclear warheads, although it could have more. Islamabad is producing fissile material, adding to related production facilities, and deploying additional nuclear weapons and new types of delivery vehicles. Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal is widely regarded as designed to dissuade India from taking military action against Pakistan, but Islamabad’s expansion of its nuclear arsenal, development of new types of nuclear weapons, and adoption of a doctrine called “full spectrum deterrence” have led some observers to express concern about an increased risk of nuclear conflict between Pakistan and India, which also continues to expand its nuclear arsenal. Pakistan has in recent years taken a number of steps to increase international confidence in the security of its nuclear arsenal. Moreover, Pakistani and U.S. officials argue that, since the 2004 revelations about a procurement network run by former Pakistani nuclear official A.Q. Khan, Islamabad has taken a number of steps to improve its nuclear security and to prevent further proliferation of nuclear-related technologies and materials. A number of important initiatives, such as strengthened export control laws, improved personnel security, and international nuclear security cooperation programs, have improved Pakistan’s nuclear security. However, instability in Pakistan has called the extent and durability of these reforms into question. Some observers fear radical takeover of the Pakistani government or diversion of material or technology by personnel within Pakistan’s nuclear complex.
  • Consideration of Low Enriched Uranium Space Reactors

    Consideration of Low Enriched Uranium Space Reactors

    AlM Propul~oo aoo Eo«gy Forum 10.25 1416 .20 18~3 Jllly9-11, 2018,0ncinoaoi,Obio 2018 Joi.ot PropuiS;ion Confereoce Chock fof updates Consideration of Low Enriched Uranium Space Reactors David Lee Black, Ph.D. 1 Retired, Formerly Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Washington, DC, 20006. USA The Federal Government (NASA, DOE) has recently shown interest in low enrichment uranium (LEU) reactors for space power and propulsion through its studies at national laboratories and a contract with private industry. Several non-governmental organizations have strongly encouraged this approach for nuclear non-proliferation and safety reasons. All previous efforts have been with highly enriched uranium (HEU) reactors. This study evaluates and compares the effects of changing from HEU reactors with greater than 90% U-235 to LEU with less than 20% U-235. A simple analytic approach was used, the validity of which has been established by comparison with existing test data for graphite fuel only. This study did not include cermet fuel. Four configurations were analyzed: NERVA NRX, LANL's SNRE, LEU, and generic critical HEU and LEU reactors without a reflector. The nuclear criticality multiplication factor, size, weight and system thermodynamic performance were compared, showing the strong dependence on moderator-to-fuel ratio in the reactor. The conclusions are that LEU reactors can be designed to meet mission requirements of lifetime and operability. It ,.;u be larger and heavier by about 4000 lbs than a highly enriched uranium reactor to meet the same requirements. Mission planners should determine the penalty of the added weight on payload. The amount ofU-235 in an HEU core is not significantly greater in an LEU design with equal nuclear requirements.
  • Re-Examining the Role of Nuclear Fusion in a Renewables-Based Energy Mix

    Re-Examining the Role of Nuclear Fusion in a Renewables-Based Energy Mix

    Re-examining the Role of Nuclear Fusion in a Renewables-Based Energy Mix T. E. G. Nicholasa,∗, T. P. Davisb, F. Federicia, J. E. Lelandc, B. S. Patela, C. Vincentd, S. H. Warda a York Plasma Institute, Department of Physics, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK b Department of Materials, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PH c Department of Electrical Engineering and Electronics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GJ, UK d Centre for Advanced Instrumentation, Department of Physics, Durham University, Durham DH1 3LS, UK Abstract Fusion energy is often regarded as a long-term solution to the world's energy needs. However, even after solving the critical research challenges, engineer- ing and materials science will still impose significant constraints on the char- acteristics of a fusion power plant. Meanwhile, the global energy grid must transition to low-carbon sources by 2050 to prevent the worst effects of climate change. We review three factors affecting fusion's future trajectory: (1) the sig- nificant drop in the price of renewable energy, (2) the intermittency of renewable sources and implications for future energy grids, and (3) the recent proposition of intermediate-level nuclear waste as a product of fusion. Within the scenario assumed by our premises, we find that while there remains a clear motivation to develop fusion power plants, this motivation is likely weakened by the time they become available. We also conclude that most current fusion reactor designs do not take these factors into account and, to increase market penetration, fu- sion research should consider relaxed nuclear waste design criteria, raw material availability constraints and load-following designs with pulsed operation.
  • The Electronuclear Conversion of Fertile to Fissile Material

    The Electronuclear Conversion of Fertile to Fissile Material

    UCRL-52144 THE ELECTRONUCLEAR CONVERSION OF FERTILE TO FISSILE MATERIAL C. M. Van Atta J. D. Lee H. Heckrotto October 11, 1976 Prepared for U.S. Energy Research & Development Administration under contract No. W-7405-Eng-48 II\M LAWRENCE lUg LIVERMORE k^tf LABORATORY UnrmsilyotCatftxna/lJvofmofe s$ PC DISTRIBUTION OF THIS DOCUMENmmT IS UMUMWTED NOTICE Thii npoit WM prepared w u account of wot* •pomond by UM Uiilttd Stalwi GovcmiMM. Nittim Uw United Stain nor the United Statn Energy tUwardi it Development AdrnWrtrtUon, not «y of thei* employee!, nor any of their contricton, •ubcontrecton, or their employe*!, makti any warranty, expreai « Implied, or muMi any toga) liability oc reeponafctUty for the accuracy, completenni or uMfulntat of uy Information, apperatui, product or proem dlecloead, or repreienl. that tu UM would not *nfrkig» prrrtt*)}MWiwd r%hl». NOTICE Reference to a oompmy or product rum don not imply approval or nconm ndatjon of the product by the Untnrtity of California or the US. Energy Research A Devetopnient Administration to the uchvton of others that may be suitable. Printed In the United Stitei or America Available from National Technical Information Service U.S. Department of Commerce 528S Port Royal Road Springfield, VA 22161 Price: Printed Copy S : Microfiche $2.25 DMimtic P»t» Ranflt PHca *•#» Rtnft MM 001-025 $ 3.50 326-350 10.00 026-050 4.00 351-375 10.50 051-075 4.50 376-400 10.75 076-100 5.00 401-425 11.00 101-125 5.50 426-450 31.75 126-150 6.00 451-475 12.00 151-175 6.75 476-500 12.50 176-200 7.50 501-525 12.75 201-225 7.75 526-550 13.00 526-250 8.00 551-575 13.50 251-275 9.00 576-600 I3.7S 276-300 9.25 601 -up 301-325 9.75 *Ml J2.50 fot «ch iddltlOMl 100 pip tacmitMt from 601 ID 1,000 flfcK IM 54.50 for eicli iMUknal I0O plfe feenmMI om 1,000 p*o.
  • Advanced Reactors with Innovative Fuels

    Advanced Reactors with Innovative Fuels

    Nuclear Science Advanced Reactors with Innovative Fuels Workshop Proceedings Villigen, Switzerland 21-23 October 1998 NUCLEAR•ENERGY•AGENCY OECD, 1999. Software: 1987-1996, Acrobat is a trademark of ADOBE. All rights reserved. OECD grants you the right to use one copy of this Program for your personal use only. Unauthorised reproduction, lending, hiring, transmission or distribution of any data or software is prohibited. You must treat the Program and associated materials and any elements thereof like any other copyrighted material. All requests should be made to: Head of Publications Service, OECD Publications Service, 2, rue AndrÂe-Pascal, 75775 Paris Cedex 16, France. OECD PROCEEDINGS Proceedings of the Workshop on Advanced Reactors with Innovative Fuels hosted by Villigen, Switzerland 21-23 October 1998 NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT Pursuant to Article 1 of the Convention signed in Paris on 14th December 1960, and which came into force on 30th September 1961, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) shall promote policies designed: − to achieve the highest sustainable economic growth and employment and a rising standard of living in Member countries, while maintaining financial stability, and thus to contribute to the development of the world economy; − to contribute to sound economic expansion in Member as well as non-member countries in the process of economic development; and − to contribute to the expansion of world trade on a multilateral, non-discriminatory basis in accordance with international obligations. The original Member countries of the OECD are Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States.
  • A Comparison of Advanced Nuclear Technologies

    A Comparison of Advanced Nuclear Technologies

    A COMPARISON OF ADVANCED NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGIES Andrew C. Kadak, Ph.D MARCH 2017 B | CHAPTER NAME ABOUT THE CENTER ON GLOBAL ENERGY POLICY The Center on Global Energy Policy provides independent, balanced, data-driven analysis to help policymakers navigate the complex world of energy. We approach energy as an economic, security, and environmental concern. And we draw on the resources of a world-class institution, faculty with real-world experience, and a location in the world’s finance and media capital. Visit us at energypolicy.columbia.edu facebook.com/ColumbiaUEnergy twitter.com/ColumbiaUEnergy ABOUT THE SCHOOL OF INTERNATIONAL AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS SIPA’s mission is to empower people to serve the global public interest. Our goal is to foster economic growth, sustainable development, social progress, and democratic governance by educating public policy professionals, producing policy-related research, and conveying the results to the world. Based in New York City, with a student body that is 50 percent international and educational partners in cities around the world, SIPA is the most global of public policy schools. For more information, please visit www.sipa.columbia.edu A COMPARISON OF ADVANCED NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGIES Andrew C. Kadak, Ph.D* MARCH 2017 *Andrew C. Kadak is the former president of Yankee Atomic Electric Company and professor of the practice at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He continues to consult on nuclear operations, advanced nuclear power plants, and policy and regulatory matters in the United States. He also serves on senior nuclear safety oversight boards in China. He is a graduate of MIT from the Nuclear Science and Engineering Department.
  • The Nuclear Fuel Cycle

    The Nuclear Fuel Cycle

    THE COLLECTION > From the uranium mine> toI wNTasRtOeD dUisCpToIsOaN l 1 > The atom 2 > Radioactivity 3 > Radiation and man 4 > Energy 5 > Nuclear energy: fusion and fission 6 > How a nuclear reactor works 7 > The nuclear fuel cycle 7 > The nuclear fuel cycle FROM RESEARCH 8 > Microelectronics 9 > The laser: a concentrate of light TO INDUSTRY 10 > Medical imaging 11 > Nuclear astrophysics 12 > Hydrogen 7 >>TThhee nnuucclleeaarr ffuueell ccyyccllee UPSTREAM THE REACTOR: PREPARING THE FUEL IN THE REACTOR: FUEL CONSUMPTION DOWNSTREAM THE REACTOR: REPROCESSING NUCLEAR WASTE NUCLEAR WASTE © Commissariat à l’’Énergie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives, 2005 Communication Division Bâtiment Siège - 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette cedex www.cea.fr ISSN 1637-5408. From the uranium mine to waste disposal 7 > The nuclear fuel cycle From the uranium mine to waste disposal 7 > The nuclear fuel cycle 2 > CONTENTS > INTRODUCTION 3 Uranium ore is extracted from open-pit mines – such as the McClear mines in Canada seen here – or underground workings. a m e g o C © “The nuclear fuel cycle includes an erray UPSTREAM THE REACTOR: of industrial operations, from uranium PREPARING THE FUEL 4 e mining to the disposal of radioactive l Extracting uranium from the ore 5 waste.” c Concentrating and refining uranium 6 y Enriching uranium 6 c Enrichment methods 8 l introduction uel is a material that can be burnt to pro - IN THE REACTOR: FUEL CONSUMPTION 9 Fvide heat. The most familiar fuels are wood, e Preparing fuel assemblies 10 coal, natural gas and oil. By analogy, the ura - e g a nium used in nuclear power plants is called Per unit or mass (e.g.
  • Fission-Produced 99Mo Without a Nuclear Reactor

    Fission-Produced 99Mo Without a Nuclear Reactor

    BRIEF COMMUNICATIONS Fission-Produced 99Mo Without a Nuclear Reactor Amanda J. Youker, Sergey D. Chemerisov, Peter Tkac, Michael Kalensky, Thad A. Heltemes, David A. Rotsch, George F. Vandegrift, John F. Krebs, Vakho Makarashvili, and Dominique C. Stepinski Argonne National Laboratory, Nuclear Engineering Division, Argonne, Illinois halted in the past due to inclement weather, natural phenomena, 99Mo, the parent of the widely used medical isotope 99mTc, is cur- flight delays, and terrorist threats (6). rently produced by irradiation of enriched uranium in nuclear reac- The predominant global 99Mo production route is irradiation of tors. The supply of this isotope is encumbered by the aging of these highly enriched uranium (HEU, $20% 235U) solid targets in nuclear reactors and concerns about international transportation and nu- reactors fueled by uranium (2). Other potential 99Mo production Methods: clear proliferation. We report results for the production paths include (n,g)98Mo and (g,n)100Mo; however, both routes re- of 99Mo from the accelerator-driven subcritical fission of an aqueous quire enriched molybdenum material and produce low-specific- solution containing low enriched uranium. The predominately fast 99 neutrons generated by impinging high-energy electrons onto a tan- activity Mo, which cannot be loaded directly on a commercial 99m talum convertor are moderated to thermal energies to increase fission Tc generator. The U.S. National Nuclear Security Administra- processes. The separation, recovery, and purification of 99Mo were tion implements the long-standing U.S. policy to minimize and demonstrated using a recycled uranyl sulfate solution. Conclusion: eliminate HEU in civilian applications by working to convert re- The 99Mo yield and purity were found to be unaffected by reuse of the search reactors and medical isotope production facilities to low previously irradiated and processed uranyl sulfate solution.