Lessons Learned from Community Forestry in Africa and Their Relevance for Redd+ Forest Carbon, Markets and Communities (Fcmc) Program

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lessons Learned from Community Forestry in Africa and Their Relevance for Redd+ Forest Carbon, Markets and Communities (Fcmc) Program LESSONS LEARNED FROM COMMUNITY FORESTRY IN AFRICA AND THEIR RELEVANCE FOR REDD+ FOREST CARBON, MARKETS AND COMMUNITIES (FCMC) PROGRAM NOVEMBER 2013 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by FCMC. This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development by Tetra Tech, through a Task Order under the Prosperity, Livelihoods, and Conserving Ecosystems (PLACE) Indefinite Quantity Contract Core Task Order (USAID Contract No. EPP-I-00-06-00008-00, Order Number AID-OAA-TO-11-00022). This report was prepared by: Tetra Tech 159 Bank Street, Suite 300 Burlington, Vermont 05401 USA Telephone: (802) 658-3890 Email: [email protected] www.tetratechintdev.com Forest Carbon, Markets and Communities Program (FCMC) 1611 North Kent Street, Suite 805 Arlington, VA 22209 Tel: (703) 592-6388 Scott Hajost, Chief of Party Email: [email protected] Ian Deshmukh, Senior Technical Advisor/Manager Email: [email protected] Olaf Zerbock, USAID Contracting Officer’s Representative Email: [email protected] For more information regarding this study, contact: Paula J. Williams, FCMC Social and Environmental Soundness Task Lead Email: [email protected] This report is one of four reports on “Lessons Learned from Community Forestry and Their Relevance for REDD+.” The series comprises three regional reviews on this topic, prepared for Latin America (by Janis Alcorn), Africa (by Tom Blomley) and Asia (by Robert Fisher). The global synthesis of the three regional reviews was prepared by Roy Hagen. Paula J. Williams has managed and served as the overall editor for the three regional reviews and a global synthesis. All four reports have been reviewed and edited by FCMC. Photo credit – Villagers carrying wood, Uganda, Tom Blomley Please cite this publication as: Blomley, Tom. 2013. Lessons Learned from Community Forestry in Africa and Their Relevance for REDD+. USAID-supported Forest Carbon, Markets and Communities (FCMC) Program. Washington, DC, USA. LESSONS LEARNED FROM COMMUNITY FORESTRY IN AFRICA AND THEIR RELEVANCE FOR REDD+ ii LESSONS LEARNED FROM COMMUNITY FORESTRY IN AFRICA AND THEIR RELEVANCE FOR REDD++ FOREST CARBON, MARKETS AND COMMUNITIES (FCMC) PROGRAM NOVEMBER 2013 DISCLAIMER The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. LESSONS LEARNED FROM COMMUNITY FORESTRY IN AFRICA AND THEIR RELEVANCE FOR REDD+ iii TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................. IV ACRONYMS ..................................................................................................................... V EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................. VIII KEY FINDINGS ON COMMUNITY FORESTRY IN AFRICA ..................................................................... VIII RECOMMENDATIONS FOR REDD+ ............................................................................................................ IX 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 1 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE COMMUNITY FORESTRY REVIEW ...................................................................... 1 1.2 METHODOLOGY USED AND LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY ......................................................... 2 2.0 OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................ 3 3.0 KEY LESSONS LEARNED RELEVANT TO REDD+ .............................................. 8 3.1 EMPOWERMENT OF COMMUNITIES ................................................................................................ 8 3.1.1 Community Tenure and the State’s Role in Community Empowerment ................. 8 3.1.2 Conclusions and Implications for REDD+....................................................................... 11 3.2 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT AND GOVERNANCE ................................................................... 11 3.2.1 Stakeholder Engagement and Governance at the Community-level ........................ 11 3.2.2 Gender Issues and Women’s Participation ..................................................................... 13 3.2.3 Governance and Stakeholders at Different Levels ........................................................ 14 3.2.4 Conclusions and Implications for REDD+....................................................................... 15 3.3 BENEFITS AND INCENTIVES FOR COMMUNITY INVESTMENT IN COMMUNITY FORESTRY ..... 16 3.3.1 Forest Management Benefits, Incentives and Costs...................................................... 16 3.3.2 Benefit Distribution and Capture ...................................................................................... 18 3.3.3 Conclusions and Implications for REDD+....................................................................... 19 3.4 CAPACITY BUILDING ......................................................................................................................20 3.4.1 Importance of Capacity Building at the Community-Level ......................................... 20 3.4.2 Capacity Building of Community Forestry Support Institutions ................................ 21 3.4.3 Arenas of Successful Local Capacity Building ................................................................. 21 3.4.4 Conclusions and Implications for REDD+....................................................................... 22 3.5 SCALING UP COMMUNITY FORESTRY INITIATIVES ..................................................................... 22 3.5.1 Experiences from National Community Forestry Initiatives ...................................... 22 3.5.2 Conclusions and Implications for REDD+....................................................................... 24 3.6 SUSTAINABILITY OF COMMUNITY FORESTRY .............................................................................. 24 3.6.1 Environmental Sustainability ................................................................................................24 3.6.2 Financial Sustainability ...........................................................................................................25 3.6.3 Socioeconomic Sustainability .............................................................................................. 25 3.6.4 Conclusions and Implications for REDD+....................................................................... 26 4.0 EMERGING REDD+ AND COMMUNITY FORESTRY ISSUES .......................... 27 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................. 29 5.1 CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................................................29 5.2 RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................................................................................29 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................. 31 LESSONS LEARNED FROM COMMUNITY FORESTRY IN AFRICA AND THEIR RELEVANCE FOR REDD+ iv ACRONYMS CAF Chantier d’Aménagement Forestier [Forest Management Project Site, Burkina Faso] CBFM Community Based Forest Management CBFP Congo Basin Forest Partnership CBNRM Community Based Natural Resource Management CFA Community Forest Association CREMA Community Resource Management Agreement DRC Democratic Republic of Congo EU European Union FAO Food and Agriculture Organization (of the United Nations) FIP Forest Investment Program FMC Forest Management Committee [Guinea] FSC Forest Stewardship Council GFA Guinean francs ha Hectares ICA Indigenous Conserved Areas IPs Indigenous Peoples IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature JFM Joint Forest Management LFI Liberia Forest Initiative LRCFP Land Rights and Community Forestry Program [USAID program in Liberia] MCDI Mpingo Conservation and Development Initiative MOMA Monitoring Matters NGO Non-governmental Organization NIFCI Norway’s International Forest and Climate Initiative OFAC Observatoire des Forêts d’Afrique Central [Observatory of Forests of Central Africa] PAGE Promoting Agriculture, Governance, and Environment [USAID program in Sierra Leone] PFM Participatory Forest Management PROSPER People, Rules, and Organizations Supporting the Protection of Ecosystem Resources [USAID program in Liberia] LESSONS LEARNED FROM COMMUNITY FORESTRY IN AFRICA AND THEIR RELEVANCE FOR REDD+ v REDD+ Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation SIDA Swedish International Development Agency (now known as Sida, the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency) VFC Village Forest Committee UNEP United Nations Environmental Programme UNFCCC United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change USAID United States Agency for International Development LESSONS LEARNED FROM COMMUNITY FORESTRY IN AFRICA AND THEIR RELEVANCE FOR REDD+ vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS A great number of people kindly helped with information, report and articles used in compiling this review. They include Liz Alden Wily, Ben Irwin, Kees Voigt, Michael Richards, Edith Kabasiime, Thorsten Treue, Jens Friis Lund, Neil Burgess, Mike Nurse, Fred Nelson, Harry Jonas, Finn Danielsen, Eunice Mahoro, Maj Manczak, Karen
Recommended publications
  • Improving Natural Resource Management a Feinstein International Center Desk Study
    Lessons for Taadoud II: Improving Natural Resource Management A Feinstein International Center Desk Study By Helen Young, Merry Fitzpatrick, Anastasia Marshak, Anne Radday, Francesco Staro, and Aishwarya Venkat April 2019 Table of Contents Acronyms ............................................................................................................................................... iv Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. v Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 2 Roadmap ............................................................................................................................................. 3 Methods .............................................................................................................................................. 3 Part 1. History and context of disasters and development in Sudan ...................................................... 5 A shift from what makes communities vulnerable to what makes them resilient ............................. 7 Key points for Taadoud II .................................................................................................................. 11 Part 2. Livelihoods, conflict, power, and institutions ............................................................................ 12 Diverging views on drivers of the Darfur conflict
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Information Worldwide an INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL for INFORMATION SPECIALISTS in AGRICULTURE, NATURAL RESOURCES, and the ENVIRONMENT
    Agricultural Information Worldwide AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR INFORMATION SPECIALISTS IN AGRICULTURE, NATURAL RESOURCES, AND THE ENVIRONMENT ISSN: 1998-0027 Vol. 2, No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` B 7 7: [ = \]_`` B + 7 7: [ 6 : ^ = \]a_` B + 7 7: [ 6 : ^ = \]bb`` 7 : [ = \]^`` + 7 : [ = \]c`` 7 7 C
    [Show full text]
  • Coordination in Post-Conflict Situations and Post-Natural Disasters
    Chapter 6 Coordination in Post-Conflict Situations and Post-Natural Disasters Efforts towards greater system-wide coherence and UN reform imple- mentation are of particular importance in crisis and post-conflict contexts, when transaction costs for nascent or fragile governments and national partners must be minimized. In 2006, through tools such as the Post-Conflict Needs Assessment (PCNA) and the transitional strategy, UNCT work focused on supporting peace consolidation efforts, building sustainable institutions, and creating the necessary preconditions for development. Over the past year UNCTs also continued to provide critical planning and coordination support for natural disaster recovery and reconstruction as well as avian influenza preparedness. Post-Conflict Needs Assessments In recent years the PCNA methodology has been developed jointly by UNDG and the World Bank to help national actors undertake a systematic, conflict sensitive and inclusive assessment of priority needs. The PCNA has been used in Iraq (2003), Liberia (2003- 2004), Haiti (2004), Sudan (2004-2005), Somalia (2005-2006), and Darfur (2006). The methodology includes needs assessment, costing, and a prioritization of results in an 70 71 Somalia and Sudan — Undertaking Joint Needs Assessments accompanying Transitional Results Since late 2005, in an effort to support In June 2006 in Sudan, as mandated in Matrix (TRM). One of the overall aims of Somali-led efforts to deepen peace and the Darfur Peace Agreement (DPA), the the PCNA is to help governments devel- reduce poverty, the Somalia UNCT has Darfur Joint Assessment Mission (D-JAM) op nationally defined priorities. Another been undertaking the Somali Joint Needs began to identify key early recovery and is to identify the interventions and finan- Assessment (JNA).
    [Show full text]
  • A Policy Overview of Property Rights and Governance of Africa's Rangelands
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge XXI International Grassland Congress / VIII International Grassland Congress Proceedings International Rangeland Congress Taming a 'Wicked' Policy Problem: A Policy Overview of Property Rights and Governance of Africa's Rangelands Esther Mwangi Harvard University Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/igc Part of the Plant Sciences Commons, and the Soil Science Commons This document is available at https://uknowledge.uky.edu/igc/21/19-1/2 The XXI International Grassland Congress / VIII International Rangeland Congress took place in Hohhot, China from June 29 through July 5, 2008. Proceedings edited by Organizing Committee of 2008 IGC/IRC Conference Published by Guangdong People's Publishing House This Event is brought to you for free and open access by the Plant and Soil Sciences at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Grassland Congress Proceedings by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 瞯 9 62 瞯 Multifunctional Grasslands in a Changing World Volume Ⅱ ] Taming a ' wicked ' policy problem : a policy overview of property rights and governance of Africa摧s ra�ngelands� Esther M w angi Center f or International Development , K ennedy School o f Government , H arv ard University , 503A Rubenstein Building , 79 JFK Street , Cambridge , MA 02138 , USA E‐mail : esther _ mw angi@ ksg .harv ard .edu Key Points : This paper views property rights in dryland Africa as presenting a �wicked�policy problem . Securing rights has generally involved several interrelated and complex processes . Each of these �solutions�shows , is in turn beset by new problems , key among them are entrenching local participation in decision making , preventing manipulation and capture by elites , lack of accountability of local level institutions and authorities , and the onset of a new generation of user conflicts .
    [Show full text]
  • Country Programme Evaluation- DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC
    EVALUATION REPORT EV704 February 2010 Department for International Development DFID, the Department for International Development: leading the British Government’s fight against world poverty. One in six people in the world today, around 1 billion people, live in poverty COUNTRY PROGRAMME on less than one dollar a day. In an increasingly interdependent world, many problems – like conflict, crime, pollution and diseases such as HIV and AIDS – are caused or made worse by poverty. EVALUATION DFID supports long-term programmes to help tackle the underlying causes of poverty. DFID also responds to emergencies, both natural and man-made. DEMOCRATIC DFID’s work forms part of a global promise to: REPUBLIC OF CONGO • halve the number of people living in extreme poverty and hunger • ensure that all children receive primary education 2003-2008 • promote sexual equality and give women a stronger voice • reduce child death rates • improve the health of mothers • combat HIV and AIDS, malaria and other diseases • make sure the environment is protected • build a global partnership for those working in development. By Charlotte Vaillant, Ann Condy, Together, these form the United Nations’ eight ‘Millennium Development Pierre Robert and Georges Tshionza Goals’, with a 2015 deadline. Each of these goals has its own, measurable, targets. DFID works in partnership with governments, civil society, the private sector and others. It also works with multilateral institutions, including the World Bank, United Nations agencies and the European Commission. DFID works directly in over 150 countries worldwide, with a budget of some £5.3 billion in 2006/07. Its headquarters are in London and East Kilbride, near Glasgow.
    [Show full text]
  • Peacebuilding, Power, and Politics in Africa Cambridge Centre of African Studies Series
    edited by Devon Curtis and Gwinyayi A. Dzinesa w i t h a f o r e w o r d b y a d e k e y e a d e b a j o Peacebuilding, cambridgePower, centre of and african Pol studiesitics series in Africa Peacebuilding, Power, and Politics in Africa CAMBRIDGE CENTRE OF AFRIcaN STUDIES SERIES Series editors: Derek R. Peterson, Harri Englund, and Christopher Warnes The University of Cambridge is home to one of the world’s leading centers of African studies. It organizes conferences, runs a weekly seminar series, hosts a specialist library, coordinates advanced gradu- ate studies, and facilitates research by Cambridge- and Africa-based academics. The Cambridge Centre of African Studies Series publishes work that emanates from this rich intellectual life. The series fosters dialogue across a broad range of disciplines in African studies and be- tween scholars based in Africa and elsewhere. Derek R. Peterson, ed. Abolitionism and Imperialism in Britain, Africa, and the Atlantic Harri Englund, ed. Christianity and Public Culture in Africa Devon Curtis and Gwinyayi A. Dzinesa, eds. Peacebuilding, Power, and Politics in Africa Peacebuilding, Power, and Politics in Africa Edited by Devon Curtis and Gwinyayi A. Dzinesa Foreword by Adekeye Adebajo Ohio University Press • Athens Ohio University Press, Athens, Ohio 45701 ohioswallow.com © 2012 by Ohio University Press All rights reserved To obtain permission to quote, reprint, or otherwise reproduce or distribute material from Ohio University Press publications, please contact our rights and permissions department at (740) 593-1154 or (740) 593-4536 (fax). Printed in the United States of America Ohio University Press books are printed on acid-free paper ƒ ™ 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 5 4 3 2 1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Peacebuilding, power, and politics in Africa / edited by Devon Curtis and Gwinyayi A.
    [Show full text]
  • FRR 2006-2008 May 2006 English A4
    Global Polio Eradication Initiative Financial resource requirements 2006 - 2008 as of May 2006 Partners in the Global Polio Eradication Initiative © World Health Organization 2006 All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization can be obtained from Marketing and Dissemination, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel: +41 22 791 2476; fax: +41 22 791 4857; email: [email protected]). Requests for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications – whether for sale or for noncommercial distribution – should be addressed to Publications, at the above address (fax: +41 22 791 4806; email: [email protected]). The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters. The World Health Organization does not warrant that the information contained in this publication is complete
    [Show full text]
  • B. Agriculture in Developing Countries
    UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT WORLD INVESTMENT 2009 REPORT Transnational Corporations, Agricultural Production and Development UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 2009 New York and Geneva, 2007 PART TWO TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATIONS, AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT INTRODUCTION For the greater part of humanity, and a growing economy that is diversifying primarily in developing countries, into other industries and sectors. What is of agriculture remains at the core of their concern is that the above-mentioned decline existence: it provides sustenance, supports in investments is often the greatest in poorer people’s livelihoods and defines their countries – especially parts of Africa and traditions. Moreover, the bounty of in the least developed countries (LDCs) – agricultural production in many societies which can ill-afford them. the world over, and throughout the ages, has The lack of investment in agriculture created surplus value that has underpinned in particular regions and countries is one their material basis. This applies equally to of the factors contributing to poverty and urban civilizations founded in the past, the hunger, the reduction of which has been triangular trade of the colonial period which declared the first of the United Nations aided the industrialization of Europe and Millennium Development Goals (MDG- North America (Thomas, 1997), the more 1).1 In stark terms, 923 million people were 2009 recent transformation of Taiwan Province of undernourished in 2007. And on the basis of China from a tropical agricultural island to the global hunger index (GHI), 65 countries an electronics superpower (Lee, 1971; Wu, are in “serious”, “alarming” or “extremely 1984), and the significant agriculture-based alarming” danger of food shortages, partly dynamism and diversification of Brazil’s because of rising international food prices economy today (Brainard and Martinez- in recent years.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change and Conflict: Lessons for Conflict Resolution from The
    CLIMATE CHANGE AND CONFLICT: Lessons for Conflict Resolution from the Southern Sahel of Sudan SALOMÉ BRONKHORST CLIMATE CHANGE AND CONFLICT: Lessons for Conflict Resolution from the Southern Sahel of Sudan Salomé Bronkhorst A report based on desk research and fieldwork conducted by the African Centre for the Constructive Resolution of Disputes (ACCORD), funded by the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida). ACCORD The African Centre for the Constructive Resolution of Disputes (ACCORD) is a non- governmental organisation working throughout Africa to bring creative African solutions to the challenges posed by conflict on the continent. ACCORD’s primary aim is to influence political developments by bringing conflict resolution, dialogue and institutional development to the forefront as an alternative to armed violence and protracted conflict. Acknowledgements The field and desk research for this report was made possible by a generous contribution from the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida). The author thanks those who generously gave their time and experience, in particular the individuals interviewed and Azza Ahmed, Mohammed Elhassan Eissa and Mubarak Michael who facilitated the fieldwork. Disclaimer Views expressed in this report are not necessarily those of ACCORD or Sida. While every attempt is made to ensure that the information published here is accurate, no responsibility is accepted for any loss or damage that may arise out of the reliance of any person upon any of the information contained in this report. Copyright © 2011 ACCORD This publication may be downloaded at no charge from the ACCORD website: http://www.accord.org.za. All rights reserved. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Humanitarian Update Reporting Period: 1-30 April 2007
    1 OCHA Regional Office for Central and East Africa Volume 1 , Issue 2 Regional Humanitarian Update Reporting period: 1-30 April 2007 United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs CROSS BORDER & REGIONAL HIGHLIGHTS In this issue Long Rains in the Horn § Cross border and regional highlights p. 1,2&3 As forecasted in March by the IGAD Prediction and appli- § Focus: Civil-Military Relations p. 3 & 4 cations Centre (ICPAC), the heavy rains expected in many § Country Coverage p. 5 & 6 parts of the Horn of Africa are ongoing. According to So- malia Water and Land Information Management (SWALIM), the water levels of rivers in Somalia are within According to OCHA Somalia, agencies have stepped up the normal range expected at this time of the year. How- preparedness levels and the Flood Working Group (FWG) ever, fears remain over the possibility of flooding in the has focussed on addressing hydro meteorological issues, Shabelle and Juba riverine areas as a result of increased early warning, contingency planning and flood situation rainfall in Ethiopian highlands. reports, while the Inter-Cluster Working Group (ICWG) is focussing on operational issues. Rehabilitation of priority infrastructure, such as the Duduble Canal, intended to avert flooding through diver- In Ethiopia, normal and above normal rainfall continued to sion of flood water, remains critical as a means of ensuring fall in Belg areas of the south-western Ethiopian highlands. resilience and recovery for the communities. Existing safe On 12 April, following heavy rainfall, the city of Dire Dawa havens from flood prone areas in Jowhar have been af- experienced flash flooding.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Food Security and Vulnerability Analysis (CFSVA)
    SSuuddaann Comprehensive Food Security and Vulnerability Analysis (CFSVA) Data collected in May 2006 Strengthening Emergency Needs Assessment Capacity (SENAC) Sudan: Comprehensive Food Security and Vulnerability Analysis (CFSVA) Prepared by Jonathan Rivers, Cinzia Papavero, William Nall, Jan Delbaere, Peter Horjus, Daniel Molla, and Billy Mwinga. December 2007 © World Food Programme, Vulnerability Analysis and Mapping Branch (ODAV) Picture: ©2006 WFP/Emilia Casella This study was prepared under the umbrella of the “Strengthening Emergency Needs Assessment Capacity” (SENAC). Financial support for this study was provided by European Union and the Citigroup Foundation. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union or the Citigroup Foundation. For any queries on this document or the SENAC project, please contact [email protected] or visit www.wfp.org/odan/senac For information about the VAM Unit, please visit: http://vam.wfp.org United Nations World Food Programme Headquarters: Via C.G. Viola 68, Parco de’ Medici, 00148, Rome, Italy Acknowledgement The Sudan Comprehensive Food Security and Vulnerability Analysis (CFSVA), is primarily based on household and community level data obtained from the Sudan Household Health Survey (SHHS) of the Government of National Unity of Sudan and the Government of Southern Sudan. WFP provided funds and technical support for the food security component of the SHHS. WFP gratefully acknowledges the partnership on the SHHS with the Federal Ministry of Health (FMoH) and the Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS) representing the Government of National Unity (GoNU), and the Ministry of Health (MoH) together with the Southern Sudan Commission for Census, Statistics and Evaluation (SSCCSE), both representing the Government of Southern Sudan (GoSS).
    [Show full text]
  • OCHA Annual Report 2006 Activities and Use of Extrabudgetary Funds
    AnnuAl RepoRt OCHA AFFAIRS OF HUMANITARIAN THE COORDINATION OFFICE FOR ACTIvities AND USE OF ExtrabUDgetary FUNDS United Nations Coordination Activities in the Field oCHA AnnuAl RepoRt 2006 ACTIvities AND USE OF ExtrabUDgetary FUNDS United Nations OFFICE FOR THE COORDINATION OF HUMANITARIAN AFFAIRS Editorial Team Prepared by OCHA staff and consultants under the guidance of Rashid Khalikov, Director, OCHA New York. OCHA wishes to acknowledge the outstanding contributions of its committed staff at headquarters and in the field in the preparation of the narrative, financial and graphic components of this document. Managing Editor: Meredith Lewis Assistant Editors: Maria-Theresa Angulo Paola Emerson Jose Maria Garcia Matthew Hochbrueckner Margaret Ross Edem Wosornu Cartographers: Akiko Harayama and Lauren Paletta, ReliefWeb, OCHA Design, Layout and Printing: Phoenix Design Aid Legend for Maps Photographs: Regional Office OCHA wishes to thank IRIN and field offices for permission to use Field Office the photographs included in this report. Sub-Office For additional information, please contact: Field Presence Magda Ninaber van Eyben Other Location Chief, Donor and External Relations Section OCHA Geneva The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on the maps do not imply Telephone: +41 22 917 1864 official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. Email: [email protected] oCHA’S MISSIon The mission of the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) is to mobilize and coordinate effective and principled humanitarian action in partnership with national and international actors in order to: • alleviate human suffering in disasters and emergencies; • advocate for the rights of people in need; • promote preparedness and prevention; and • facilitate sustainable solutions.
    [Show full text]