DOCSLIB.ORG

The Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima an Interview with Mr

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima an Interview with Mr Doerr 1 A Rain of Ruin: The Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima An Interview with Mr. Francis Mitsuo Tomosawa by Leili Doerr Mr. Alex Haight February 12, 2007 Doerr 2 Table of Contents Release Form 2 Statement of Purpose 3 Biography 4 Historical Contextualization 6 Interview Trmiscription 25 Interview Analysis 81 Appendix 1 90 Appendix 2 91 Appendix 3 92 Appendix 4 93 Appendix 5 94 Appendix 6 95 Appendix 7 96 Appendix 8 97 Appendix 9 98 Appendix 10 99 Appendix 11 100 Appendix 12 101 Appendix 13 102 Appendix 14 103 Time Indexing/Recording Log Ill Works Consulted 113 Doerr 3 Statement of Purpose The purpose of this oral history is to achieve a better understanding ofthe atomic bombing of Hiroshima, and the pacific theatre ofthe Second World War, through an interview with Mr. Francis Mitsuo Tomosawa. The project aims to give a more valuable and intimate perspective of these events thmi can be acquired anywhere else. The Second World War still remains the most 'Sv odd-shaping" event ofthe 20 century and a thorough understanding ofit is a fundmnental part of any study ofthe United States. Doerr 4 Biography ' ^ ^B t ^^ Francis Mitsuo Tomosawa was bom in Honolulu, Hawaii, on January 25, 1930. Bom to Japanese natives, he was the youngest of three sons. Like most Japanese parents in Hawaii, Mr. Tomosawa's parents believed that their three sons must to go to Japan in order to experience a firsthand education about the Japanese culture. Therefore, in April 1941, at the age of eleven, Mr. Tomosawa and his mother lefl: for Hiroshima. As World War II raged on, conditions grew worse in Japan, and everything became rationed as the Japanese found themselves engaged in a war with the United States. Mr. Tomosawa's school was closed down and all students were assigned jobs to help in the war effort. On the moming of August 6, 1945, Mr. Tomosawa was heading to work when he witnessed two American B-29 bombers appear overhead. Looking into the sky, Mr. Tomosawa saw a "bomb reflecting in the sunlight," (Tomosawa 36). He was a witness to the first atomic bombing in history. Following the end ofthe war, Mr. Tomosawa, being a U.S. citizen, applied to retum to Hawaii. Nevertheless, it took almost three years to approve his application, and Doerr 5 in 1948 he was finally able to retum mid be reunited with his entire fmnily. Soon after, in 1951-54, Mr. Tomosawa was drafted in the Koremi War as a U.S. soldier. He was forced to face the atrocities of war once more. After returning from the war, Mr. Tomosawa was able to finish his schooling, and graduated from college in 1964, in California. In 1982, Mr. Tomosawa was invited by Senator Kennedy to attend a Sub- Committee Interim concerning the topic of "nuclem freeze ." Mr. Tomosawa, along with several other survivors, testified his experience for the first time ever. Following the meeting, he was able to open up, and speak of his involvement in the bombing at universities, high schools, elementary schools, churches, city orgmiizations, televisions stations, radio broadcasts, and newspaper interviews. Mr. Tomosawa understands that the events of Hiroshima have changed him forever and he vows that he must work for peace throughout his life. Mr. Tomosawa held the position ofthe President ofthe Committee of Atomic Bomb Survivors in the USA from 1994-2004. His role as President consisted of addressing problems ofthe survivors in the United States, doing "whatever possible," whether they needed financial help, medical or even psychological help (Tomosawa 61). Now at the age of 76, Mr. Tomosawa has been married for 48 yems, and currently lives in Whittier, California. He is a retired eye doctor, a father, and a grandfather. He continues to remain involved through his role as a delegate for the North America Atomic Bomb Survivors Bomb Association. His hobbies consist of traveling, reading, and drawing. Mr. Tomosawa continues to work for peace by spreading the word that what happened to his friends and family in Japan must never happen again. ^ The "nuclear freeze" was a proposed agreement between the world's nuclear powers, primarily the United States and the Soviet Union, to freeze all production of new nuclear arms and to leave levels of nuclear armament where they currently were. Doerr 6 The Pacific Theatre of World Wm II Historimis such as John Toland choose to take the radical view on the Japanese attack of Pearl Harbor. Toland, similar to other historians, believes that "Roosevelt and a small group of advisors—including Stimson, Knox, and Marshall—had, by December 4, unambiguous information indicating that Japanese carriers were headed eastward toward Hawaii," but refused to pass on the important information to Navy commmiders Admiral Kimmel mid General Short (Spector 97). The purpose of withholding the information may have been to produce an excuse for the United States to enter World Wm. Popular culture considered the attack on Peml Harbor an atrocity in American history. Nonetheless, atrocities are not unusual due to the countless that have taken place throughout history. For example, Genghis Khan, perceived by many nations as "the ruthless and bloodthirsty conqueror," is joined by General Vicente Rilles Lukban, the Philipino general who commanded the Balangiga Massacre during the Philipine- American War, as men who committed unfathomable atrocities throughout history. In fact, mmiy historians such as Eric Hobsbawm, label the period between 1914-1981 as the "Age of Extremes," due to events that occurred during the First mid Second World War, as well as the Cold Wm. The events that classify this age from the Second World War are the firebombing of Tokyo, rape of Nanking, bombing of Dresden, the Holocaust mid many more. One ofthe most highly debated atrocity of World Wm II is the atomic bombing of Hiroshima, as well as Nagas^i. The pivotal decision to drop the atomic bomb on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagas^i incited a ceaseless controversy. Nevertheless, to better understand the atomic bombing of Hiroshima one must examine the Sino-Japanese relationship, the attack on the United States naval base at Pearl Harbor, Doerr 7 the war in the Pacific, and the decision to drop the bomb, as well as gain a first-hmid perspective from someone who was there. After World Wm I, the Japanese were forced to give back a group of Pacific islands that they had acquired during the war. The League of Nations, the U.S., the U.K., Australia, and the Netherlands, which had territorial interests in Southeast Asia and the Philippines, condemned the Japanese attacks on China. In response, Japan resigned from the League of Nations in 1931. Historian Dmi van der Vat compares goals ofthe Japmiese to that of past empires such as ancient Rome when he said, "A power on the make begins to expand by 'absorbing' its immediate neighbor (in Japan's case Korea in 1910); to protect its acquisition, it conquers its neighbor's neighbor (Mmichuria), sets up a buffer state (Manchukuo), creates another buffer (northern China), and uses that as a base to move against the next victim (China), and possibly its most deadly rival (the Soviet Union)" (39). Japanese economic and military interests in Korea and southern Mmichuria were already clear by the end of World War I, expanding Tokyo's imperial vision. From 1868 to 1930, Japan's population rose by 35 million people. To sustain such a large population, Japmi became dependent on outside resources which created a large insecurity. The new territories would relieve the pressure of Japan's expanding population and industrial growth. In retum, the Asian mainland could provide both much- needed raw materials mid stations for expmided military and economic endeavors. The United States perceived these new Japanese ambitions as a potential threat to themselves and also to European empires. Japan's effort to dominate all of Asia was far from organized since they were suffering from a lack of leadership to guide them in this new intemational situation. Doerr 8 On Christmas Day of 1926, Emperor Hirohito's reign officially began. He believed that a "cure-all for Japan's problems" was a Japanese "expedition" to occupy and "bring order" to Chinese Manchuria. A war tore through China during the 1920s and 1930s as Japan gained control of Manchuria. As a result, Japan was provided with extensive iron ore, coal, mid oil resources. Such resources would free Japmi from its dependence on foreign nations (particularly the United States) for raw materials, and would ensure its status as a great power. Most Japmiese saw their involvement in Mmichuria as a logical extension of their natural interests. The hostilities between China and Japan continued on July 7, 1937 in a demilitarized zone hear Peking, where a Japanese soldier disappemed during the night. Local fighting between the Chinese and Japanese ensued, as each side believed itself "the aggrieved party." Sino-Japanese hostilities began in southern provinces as the Chinese attempted to expel Japanese military and civilian personnel from Shanghai. The Shanghai campaign expanded rapidly and disastrously for the Chinese. As the fighting proceeded, Japanese behavior in China became atrocious. Chinese soldiers attempting to surrender were frequently executed "on sight." The slaughter following the rape of Nanking in December 1937 proves to be an infamous example. Approximately 250,000 civilians and POWS were raped and slaughtered in a murderous ruin. President Frmiklin D. Roosevelt was outraged. His first response was to give a speech calling on America's friends to "quarantine aggression." Roosevelt's secondary response was to write to Americmi industrialists and request that they cutoff trade with the Japanese.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 4. CLASSIFICATION UNDER the ATOMIC ENERGY
    Chapter 4 CLASSIFICATION UNDER THE ATOMIC ENERGY ACT INTRODUCTION The Atomic Energy Act of 1946 was the first and, other than its successor, the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, to date the only U.S. statute to establish a program to restrict the dissemination of information. This Act transferred control of all aspects of atomic (nuclear) energy from the Army, which had managed the government’s World War II Manhattan Project to produce atomic bombs, to a five-member civilian Atomic Energy Commission (AEC). These new types of bombs, of awesome power, had been developed under stringent secrecy and security conditions. Congress, in enacting the 1946 Atomic Energy Act, continued the Manhattan Project’s comprehensive, rigid controls on U.S. information about atomic bombs and other aspects of atomic energy. That Atomic Energy Act designated the atomic energy information to be protected as “Restricted Data” and defined that data. Two types of atomic energy information were defined by the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, Restricted Data (RD) and a type that was subsequently termed Formerly Restricted Data (FRD). Before discussing further the Atomic Energy Act of 1946 and its unique requirements for controlling atomic energy information, some of the special information-control activities that accompanied the research, development, and production efforts that led to the first atomic bomb will be mentioned. Realization that an atomic bomb was possible had a profound impact on the scientists who first became aware of that possibility. The implications of such a weapon were so tremendous that the U.S. scientists conducting the initial, basic research related to nuclear fission voluntarily restricted the publication of their scientific work in this area.
    [Show full text]
  • Foundation Document Manhattan Project National Historical Park Tennessee, New Mexico, Washington January 2017 Foundation Document
    NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Foundation Document Manhattan Project National Historical Park Tennessee, New Mexico, Washington January 2017 Foundation Document MANHATTAN PROJECT NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK Hanford Washington ! Los Alamos Oak Ridge New Mexico Tennessee ! ! North 0 700 Kilometers 0 700 Miles More detailed maps of each park location are provided in Appendix E. Manhattan Project National Historical Park Contents Mission of the National Park Service 1 Mission of the Department of Energy 2 Introduction 3 Part 1: Core Components 4 Brief Description of the Park. 4 Oak Ridge, Tennessee. 5 Los Alamos, New Mexico . 6 Hanford, Washington. 7 Park Management . 8 Visitor Access. 8 Brief History of the Manhattan Project . 8 Introduction . 8 Neutrons, Fission, and Chain Reactions . 8 The Atomic Bomb and the Manhattan Project . 9 Bomb Design . 11 The Trinity Test . 11 Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan . 12 From the Second World War to the Cold War. 13 Legacy . 14 Park Purpose . 15 Park Signifcance . 16 Fundamental Resources and Values . 18 Related Resources . 22 Interpretive Themes . 26 Part 2: Dynamic Components 27 Special Mandates and Administrative Commitments . 27 Special Mandates . 27 Administrative Commitments . 27 Assessment of Planning and Data Needs . 28 Analysis of Fundamental Resources and Values . 28 Identifcation of Key Issues and Associated Planning and Data Needs . 28 Planning and Data Needs . 31 Part 3: Contributors 36 Appendixes 38 Appendix A: Enabling Legislation for Manhattan Project National Historical Park. 38 Appendix B: Inventory of Administrative Commitments . 43 Appendix C: Fundamental Resources and Values Analysis Tables. 48 Appendix D: Traditionally Associated Tribes . 87 Appendix E: Department of Energy Sites within Manhattan Project National Historical Park .
    [Show full text]
  • J. Robert Oppenheimer Papers [Finding Aid]. Library of Congress
    J. Robert Oppenheimer Papers A Finding Aid to the Collection in the Library of Congress Manuscript Division, Library of Congress Washington, D.C. 2016 Revised 2016 June Contact information: http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.mss/mss.contact Additional search options available at: http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.mss/eadmss.ms998007 LC Online Catalog record: http://lccn.loc.gov/mm77035188 Prepared by Carolyn H. Sung and David Mathisen Revised and expanded by Michael Spangler and Stephen Urgola in 2000, and Michael Folkerts in 2016 Collection Summary Title: J. Robert Oppenheimer Papers Span Dates: 1799-1980 Bulk Dates: (bulk 1947-1967) ID No.: MSS35188 Creator: Oppenheimer, J. Robert, 1904-1967 Extent: 76,450 items ; 301 containers plus 2 classified ; 120.2 linear feet Language: Collection material in English Location: Manuscript Division, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. Summary: Physicist and director of the Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, New Jersey. Correspondence, memoranda, speeches, lectures, writings, desk books, lectures, statements, scientific notes, and photographs chiefly comprising Oppenheimer's personal papers while director of the Institute for Advanced Study but reflecting only incidentally his administrative work there. Topics include theoretical physics, development of the atomic bomb, the relationship between government and science, nuclear energy, security, and national loyalty. Selected Search Terms The following terms have been used to index the description of this collection in the Library's online catalog. They are grouped by name of person or organization, by subject or location, and by occupation and listed alphabetically therein. People Bethe, Hans A. (Hans Albrecht), 1906-2005--Correspondence. Birge, Raymond T. (Raymond Thayer), 1887- --Correspondence.
    [Show full text]
  • Gar Alperovitz and the Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb
    Advances in Historical Studies 2013. Vol.2, No.2, 46-53 Published Online June 2013 in SciRes (http://www.scirp.org/journal/ahs) DOI:10.4236/ahs.2013.22008 Reclaiming Realism for the Left: Gar Alperovitz and the Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb Peter N. Kirstein History Department, St. Xavier University, Chicago, USA Email: [email protected] Received December 24th, 2012; revised February 14th, 2013; accepted February 22nd, 2013 Copyright © 2013 Peter N. Kirstein. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons At- tribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Sixty-seven years after the decision to use the atomic bomb in World War II, controversy remains whether the United States was justified in using fission bombs in combat. Gar Alperovitz, the great revi- sionist historian, in his Atomic Diplomacy and The Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb transformed our knowledge of the geopolitical motives behind the atomic attack against Japan at the end of World War II. These uranium and plutonium-core bombs were political, not primarily military in purpose and motive behind their deployment. His analysis will be compared to realists such as Hans Morgenthau, Kenneth Waltz, Henry Kissinger and George Kennan who for the most part questioned unrestrained violence and offered nuanced views on the wisdom of using such indiscriminate, savage weapons of war. The paper will explore Alperovitz’s classic argument that out of the ashes of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the A-bomb drove the incipient Cold War conflict. American national-security elites construed the bomb as a political- diplomatic lever to contain Soviet power as much as a military weapon to subdue Japan.
    [Show full text]
  • URANIUM Element Symbol: U Atomic Number: 92
    URANIUM Element Symbol: U Atomic Number: 92 An initiative of IYC 2011 brought to you by the RACI MARINELLE BASSON www.raci.org.au URANIUM Element symbol: U Atomic number: 92 Uranium is a radioactive metallic element, naturally occurring in most rocks, soil, and even in the ocean. It is occurs more commonly than gold, silver or mercury. It is formed from volcanic activity. Although uranium is not very common in the universe, it is the main source of heat inside the earth. The element is named after the planet Uranus. Uranium was discovered in 1789 in the mineral pitcheblende by German chemist, Martin Heinrich Klaproth. It wasn’t until 1841 that Eugene Péligot isolated the pure metallic element. Antoine Becquerel discovered the radioactive properties of uranium in 1896. Research begun by Enrico Fermi and others from 1934 led to uranium being used as a fuel in the nuclear power industry, with the first artificial self-sustained nuclear chain reaction being initiated on 2 December 1942. Of course, uranium can’t be discussed without remembering the impact of the uranium-fuelled bomb detonated over the Japanese city of Hiroshima. This and the plutonium- fuelled bomb exploded over Nagasaki resulted in death of 200,000 people, and contributed to the end of WWII in the Pacific. A number of scientists who worked on the bomb were against its use, making submissions to the Interim Committee advising the US President. The ethical use of scientific discoveries continues to be debated around the world. Until the world was thrust into the nuclear age with the detonation of the test atomic bomb in New Mexico on 16 July 1945, the commercial use of uranium was limited to providing colouring for ceramic products and very minor quantities of uranium metal.
    [Show full text]
  • The 3Rd New Zealand Division and Operation ‘Squarepeg’
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. “With the utmost precision and team play”: The 3rd New Zealand Division and Operation ‘Squarepeg’ A thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Master of Arts (Defence & Strategic Studies) by Shaun Mawdsley Centre for Defence and Security Studies College of Humanities and Social Sciences Massey University 2013 ABSTRACT This thesis examines the influences and course of the 3rd New Zealand (NZ) Division’s preparations for Operation ‘Squarepeg’ in the Green Islands, in February 1944. It argues that as the largest New Zealand amphibious operation of the Second World War, ‘Squarepeg’ holds a key place in identifying the development of amphibious and jungle warfare doctrine within the New Zealand Army during the war. As such, it can indicate the abilities of the 3rd NZ Division to conduct combat operations in the South Pacific in 1944. The thesis shows that the New Zealand Army was unprepared for operations in the South Pacific, as it had neglected relevant inter-war developments. The hasty formation of the 3rd NZ Division in 1942, as a response to Japanese expansion in the South Pacific, served to highlight the challenges that the division and its commander, Major-General Harold Barrowclough, had to overcome. The studying of foreign doctrine to supplement the dearth of New Zealand material was vital for the 3rd NZ Division’s preparations for deployment.
    [Show full text]
  • Martin J. Sherwin Collection Relating to J. Robert Oppenheimer [Finding
    Martin J. Sherwin Collection Relating to J. Robert Oppenhwimer A Finding Aid to the Collection in the Library of Congress Prepared by Joseph K. Brooks with the assistance of Kimberly L. Owens and Pamela K. Watkins Manuscript Division, Library of Congress Washington, D.C. 2009 Contact information: http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.mss/mss.contact Finding aid encoded by Library of Congress Manuscript Division, 2011 Finding aid URL: http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.mss/eadmss.ms011004 Collection Summary Title: Martin J. Sherwin Collection Relating to J. Robert Oppenheimer Span Dates: 1910-2006 Bulk Dates: (bulk 1931-2006) ID No.: MSS85395 Creator: Sherwin, Martin J. Extent: 26,000 items and 19 microfiche; 69 containers plus 1 classified and 2 microfiche containers; 27.6 linear feet Language: Collection material in English Repository: Manuscript Division, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. Abstract: Author, biographer, and educator. Research material gathered for the writing of American Prometheus: The Triumph and Tragedy of J. Robert Oppenheimer, including interviews and oral histories, government records, topical files, correspondence, photographs, printed matter, and miscellaneous material. Selected Search Terms The following terms have been used to index the description of this collection in the Library's online catalog. They are grouped by name of person or organization, by subject or location, and by occupation and listed alphabetically therein. People Bethe, Hans A. (Hans Albrecht), 1906-2005. Bird, Kai. Chevalier, Haakon, 1902-1985. DuBridge, Lee A. (Lee Alvin), 1901- Fergusson, Francis. Groves, Leslie R., 1896-1970. Horgan, Paul, 1903-1995. Kennan, George F. (George Frost), 1904-2005. Lilienthal, David Eli, 1899-1981.
    [Show full text]
  • An Atomic History Chapter 2
    An Atomic History 0-3 8/11/02 7:31 AM Page 18 Chapter Two 19 THE FERMI-SZILARD PILE AND URANIUM RESEARCH The first government funding for nuclear research was allocated to purchase graphite and uranium oxide for the chain reaction experiments being organized by Fermi and World War II and the Manhattan Project Szilard at Columbia University in February 1940.2 This work, which began in New York 2 City, soon spread to Princeton, the University of Chicago, and research institutions in California.3 Even at this stage, the scientists knew that a chain reaction would need three major components in the right combination: fuel, moderator, and coolant. The fuel would contain the fissile material needed to support the fission process. The neutrons generated by the fission process had to be slowed by the moderator so that they could initiate addi- tional fission reactions. The heat that resulted from this process had to be removed by the coolant. Fermi’s initial research explored the possibility of a chain reaction with natural urani- The 1930s were a time of rapid progress in the development of nuclear physics. um. It was quickly determined that high-purity graphite served as the best neutron moder- Research accelerated in the early years of the Second World War, when new developments ator out of the materials then available.4 After extensive tests throughout 1940 and early were conceived and implemented in the midst of increasing wartime urgency. American 1941, Fermi and Szilard set up the first blocks of graphite at Columbia University in government interest in these developments was limited at first, but increased as the war September 1941.
    [Show full text]
  • The Manhattan Project: Making the Atomic Bomb” Is a Short History of the Origins and Develop- Ment of the American Atomic Bomb Program During World War H
    f.IOE/MA-0001 -08 ‘9g [ . J vb JMkirlJkhilgUimBA’mmml — .— Q RDlmm UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ,:.. .- ..-. .. -,.,,:. ,.<,.;<. ~-.~,.,.- -<.:,.:-,------—,.--,,p:---—;-.:-- ---:---—---- -..>------------.,._,.... ,/ ._ . ... ,. “ .. .;l, ..,:, ..... ..’, .’< . Copies of this publication are available while supply lasts from the OffIce of Scientific and Technical Information P.O. BOX 62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831 Attention: Information Services Telephone: (423) 576-8401 Also Available: The United States Department of Energy: A Summary History, 1977-1994 @ Printed with soy ink on recycled paper DO13MA-0001 a +~?y I I Tho PROJEOT UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY F.G. Gosling History Division Executive Secretariat Management and Administration Department of Energy ]January 1999 edition . DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, make any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. I DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document. 1 Foreword The Department of Energy Organization Act of 1977 brought together for the first time in one department most of the Federal Government’s energy programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Genocide: a Comprehensive Introduction Is the Most Wide-Ranging Textbook on Geno- Cide Yet Published
    ■ GENOCIDE Genocide: A Comprehensive Introduction is the most wide-ranging textbook on geno- cide yet published. The book is designed as a text for upper-undergraduate and graduate students, as well as a primer for non-specialists and general readers interested in learning about one of humanity’s enduring blights. Over the course of sixteen chapters, genocide scholar Adam Jones: • Provides an introduction to genocide as both a historical phenomenon and an analytical-legal concept. • Discusses the role of imperalism, war, and social revolution in fueling genocide. • Supplies no fewer than seven full-length case studies of genocides worldwide, each with an accompanying box-text. • Explores perspectives on genocide from the social sciences, including psychology, sociology, anthropology, political science/international relations, and gender studies. • Considers “The Future of Genocide,” with attention to historical memory and genocide denial; initiatives for truth, justice, and redress; and strategies of intervention and prevention. Written in clear and lively prose, liberally sprinkled with illustrations and personal testimonies from genocide survivors, Genocide: A Comprehensive Introduction is destined to become a core text of the new generation of genocide scholarship. An accompanying website (www.genocidetext.net) features a broad selection of supplementary materials, teaching aids, and Internet resources. Adam Jones, Ph.D. is currently Associate Research Fellow in the Genocide Studies Program at Yale University. His recent publications
    [Show full text]
  • Books Received Blair Pierce Turner
    Books Received Blair Pierce Turner The Journal of Military History, Volume 67, Number 1, January 2003, pp. 320-323 (Article) Published by Society for Military History DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jmh.2003.0007 For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/40433 [ This content has been declared free to read by the pubisher during the COVID-19 pandemic. ] Books Received ✩ Compiler: Blair P. Turner, Virginia Military Institute General Above and Beyond: The Aviation Medals of The Politics of Coercion: Toward a Theory of Honor. By Barrett Tillman. Washington: Coercive Airpower for Post–Cold War Smithsonian Institution Press, 2002. Conflict. By Lt. Col. Ellwood P. “Skip” ISBN 1-58834-056-2. Photographs. Hinman IV, USAF. Maxwell Air Force Tables. Notes. Bibliography. Index. Pp. x, Base, Ala.: Air University Press, 2002. 294. $29.95. Biographical sketches of Notes. Bibliography. Paper. Pp. 73. Cadre over 100 awardees. Paper Number 14 from the College of The Battles of Armageddon: Megiddo and the Aerospace Doctrine, Research, and Jezreel Valley from the Bronze Age to the Education. Nuclear Age. By Eric H. Cline. Ann Arbor: The Tragedy of the Middle East. By Barry University of Michigan Press, 2002. ISBN Rubin. New York: Cambridge University 0-472-06739-7. Maps. Photographs. Press, 2002. ISBN 0-521-80623-2. Notes. Tables. Notes. Bibliography. Index. Paper. Index. Pp. viii, 287. $29.00. An analysis of Pp. 239. $17.95. Reissue of the 2000 his- the contemporary situation in the Arab torical and archaeological study of 4,000 world focuses on failures of leadership, years of warfare on the site in Israel.
    [Show full text]
  • The Altmark Affair Royal Australian
    Title Description Author Conflict "The Navy's here!" : the Altmark affair The story of the Altm ark affair and the Battle of the River Plate. W illi Frischauer and Robert Jackson W W 2 100 Years of RAN A book celebrating 100 years of the Royal Australia Navy. Royal Australian Navy The 173rd Airborne Brigade (Sky Soldiers) is the U.S. Arm y's Contingency 173rd Airborne Brigade Response Force in Europe, Turner Publishing This book covers the dramatic 12 m onths of 1940, each chapter covering 1940 The W orld In Flames the events in chronological order. Richard Collier W W 2 A collection of short stories of day to day survival of Australian soldiers in 1995 Diary Changi Changi prison cam ps. Neil Pigot W W 2 2 NZEF IP 4 Volumes The History of the 2 NZEF Oliver A. Gillespie 2/9 Bn Book of Statistics A Statistical report of the 2/9 Battalion Boyd Redshaw 200 Shots Damian Parer and George Silk and the Australians at W ar in New Guinea. Neil MacDonald W W 2 2194 Days of W ar TAhni sill ucosltleractetiodn c ohfr odnraowloingyg so,f sthke tScheecso nadn dW noortlde sW, marade at odd tim es or Cesare Salmaggi W W 2 whenever possible, is presented in book form with the hope that it will tell something of the Australian Soldier's life and journey with the Sixth Australian Division in northern New Guinea; through Aitape, Mprik and 6th Div Sketches W ewak. James W ieneke 75th Anniversary of Pearl Harbour Honouring the 2 program s used during the 75th Anniversary of the bombing of Pearl Past, Inspiring the Future Programs Harbour.
    [Show full text]