DOCSLIB.ORG

On Hypermomentum in General Relativity II. the Geometry of Spacetime

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
On Hypermomentum in General Relativity II. the Geometry of Spacetime On Hypermomentum in General Relativity II. The Geometry of Spacetime Friedrich W. Hehl, G. David Kerlick *, and Paul von der Heyde Institut für Theoretische Physik der Universität zu Köln (Z. Naturforsch. 31a, 524-527 [1976] ; received March 29, 1976) In Part I** of this series we have introduced the new notion of hypermomentum A'ik as a dynamical quantity characterizing classical matter fields. In Part II, as a preparation for a general relativistic field theory, we look for a geometry of spacetime which will allow for the accomodation of hypermomentum into general relativity. A general linearly connected spacetime with a metric (L4, g) is shown to be the appropriate geometrical framework. 1. Einstein's General Relativity and U4 Theory longest lines with respect to the metric) coincide with autoparallel curves (straightest lines with re- The success of relativistic quantum field theory spect to the connection). The Christoffel connection in describing fundamental processes continues to in GR can be interpreted physically as a "guiding affirm the validity of Minkowski's flat spacetime R4 field" because the motion of structureless non- (notation of Schouten1) as a model of reality, at rotating test particles (which can be derived from least where gravitational fields are not so strong as the field equations) turns out to be autoparallel with to dominate. respect to the connection. Einstein adopted a spacetime for general relativity After the appearance of GR, mathematicians (GR) which retains locally, in the neighborhood of stimulated by Einstein's work developed a plethora a point, the characteristics of Minkowski spacetime. of new geometries, among which the Riemannian V4 This Riemannian spacetime V4 derives all of its is a special case (compare Schouten 1 and Schrödin- properties from the metric tensor g^ (i, /'... = 0, 1, ger 3). ln the last few years, the most general affine 2,3; see Part I for notation). Interpreted physi- space compatible with a Riemannian metric (the cally, the metric tensor represents infinitesimal Riemann-Cartan space U4) was successfully applied spacetime intervals as measured by standard clocks to an extension of Einstein's GR. In the gravitational and rods (for a detailed description see Misner, theory of that spacetime, spin angular momentum is Thorne, and Wheeler 2, Ch. 13). coupled to torsion just as energy-momentum is Levi-Civita offered an additional interpretation of coupled to the metric. We take this extended gravi- the Riemannian space in terms of parallel transport tational theory, the so-called U4 theory, for granted of vectors. In addition to the metric structure, a V4 and refer to the literature 4-6 for the available evi- has an affine structure as well. The Christoffel sym- dence. bol Motivated by the considerations on hypermomen- {*} —9klA$[hdagbc] (1) tum in Part I, we will investigate a still more general is the affine connection in a V4 . Here, the permuta- geometry, namely the general affine geometry L4 tion tensor Af-f has been defined by with metric g. In this framework, which we denote by (L4, <7), the metric and the affine structures are decoupled, as are their physical interpretations. Because of the relationship (1), the affine proper- ties of a V4 can be expressed in terms of the metric 2. The General Affine Space with Metric (L4, g) tensor. There is no independent affine structure in a V4; everything is subordinate to the metric ("no Allow the 64 components of the affine connection affine freedom"). The extremal curves (shortest or rfj to be completely arbitrary, instead of being given by Equation (1). Then prescribe the (sym- * Alexander von Humboldt fellow. metric) metric tensor field g^ of signature + 2 (ten ** Z. Naturforsch. 31a, 111 [1976], independent components) and let these two fields Reprint requests to Prof. Dr. F. W. Hehl, Institut für (rfj, gij) be completely unrelated. What structures Theoretische Phvsik der Universität zu Köln, Zülpicher Straße 77, D-5000 Köln 41. can we extract from these assumptions? F. "W. Hehl et al. • On Hypermomentum in General Relativity. II 525 Without using the metric, we can split the con- dependent fields. Therefore (4 a), (4 b), and (4 c) nection rfj into its symmetric and its antisymmetric are equivalent for the description of the (h4,g). part. The symmetric part T\tj) is still an affinity, The set Equation (4 c) will turn out to be particu- transforming inhomogeniously under general co- larly convenient: the generalized contortion M^k ordinate transformations. The antisymmetric part couples to the spin of matter, whereas the non- Sif: = transforms as a tensor and has 24 in- metricity Qijk measures the deviations from U4 dependent components (Cartan's torsion). The tor- theory. Let us now analyze the affine connection of sion measures the non-commutativity of covariant an (L4,g) by means of a moving orthonormal derivatives on scalar fields (and the closure failure tetrad. of infinitesimal parallelograms). The geometrical importance of the metric gtj sug- 3. The Moving Tetrad r gests that its covariant derivative Q^ : = — V,- gjk The presence of a hyperbolic metric on an X4 (40 independent components) should be an impor- allows us to define locally at each point an (an- tant quantity in an (L4,^). This tensor, which we holonomic) orthonormal tetrad (frame) of vectors shall call nonmetricity, measures the failure of the eu which satisfy e„ • e, = g/iv = diag ( — 1, +1, +1, connection to preserve the metric during parallel + 1) at every point (/.i, v ... = 0, 1, 2, 3). When transport. The vanishing of Quk in an (L4,(/) is the the X4 is an L4 , the parallel transport of tetrads metric condition which defines a U4 geometry. In provides a suggestive visualization of the properties the corresponding U4 theory4-6, we regard the of the connection in Equation (3). We follow vanishing of Qijk as a reflection of physical reality: here essentially the presentation of Kröner 8. on a macroscopic scale, there exist global length The Christoffel part of the connection in tetrad (time) and angle standards which can be related by coordinates (the well-known Ricci rotation coeffi- parallel displacement. In the neighborhood of each cients) , causes only a rotation of the frames during point, spacetime is Euclidean with respect to metric parallel transport with respect to the given tetrad 7 and (anholonomic) connection . system. The tensor Mtjk = — Mjkj causes an addi- It will be useful to split the nonmetricity into a tional, independent rotation of the frame. Thus the trace Qj and a traceless part Qijk: tensor M^k suggests itself as the appropriate vari- Qijk = Qi9jk + Qijk • (2) able for defining dynamical spin in an (L4,#). The vector part of the nonmetricity (better known Here, Qt : = Qi}/4 and Q;/ = 0 . as the Weyl vector) causes a uniform change of With these definitions of torsion and nonmetricity scale in a parallelly transported tetrad. Relative at hand, we can express the connection in terms of lengths of the tetrad vectors and angles between g, Q, and 5 by means of the following identity: them remain unaltered. Such a geometrical variable rl= gkl Atlll 9 be - 9cd S-ai + I Qa 9bc + iQabc] suggests itself as a counterpart to the dilatation = iii) + {£•} - Mif +1 Qif . (3) current. The definitions of W'if and of the generalized con- The traceless part of the nonmetricity Qlf causes tortion tensor M^ = — in terms of S'if and a shear of the tetrad vectors which does not preserve Qijk can be read off from (3) and (1). In the case angles or relative lengths, but which does preserve the volume det(e/4) of the 4-parallelepiped whose where Qijk = 0, the generalized contortion reduces sides are given by the tetrad vectors. The dynamical to the contortion of U4 theory. counterpart that we expect to arise here is the By means of (3), we have separated the affinity traceless proper hypermomentum defined in Part I. and the tensor part of the connection. The affinity We express our results symbolically: part {ij} is expressed in terms of the metric tensor. So it is a matter of convenience which of the follow- tetrad connection of the (L4,#) (16x4) ing alternatives we use for specifying the (L4,^) : ~ contortion * (6x4) (rfj, 9a) » (9ij . ^if, Qijk) (4 a, b, c) © (relative) dilatation (1x4) (5) or (gij, Mijk, Qijk) etc. © (relative) shear (9x4) In contrast to (4 a), the sets (4 b, c) comprise only * Instead of "relative rotation", we use the more convenient tensor fields. In each case we can prescribe 74 in- term "contortion". 526 F. W. Hehl et al. • On Hypermomentum in General Relativity. II The term relative should remind us that these de- Ehlers, Pirani, and Schild (EPS)9. In this approach, formations compare two tetrads at different points the primitive concepts from which the geometry of of an (LIn Part III the tetrad deformations of spacetime is to be deduced are the paths of light Eq. (5) will be related to the corresponding dy- rays and of structureless, massive, non-rotating test namical quantities in Eq. (8) of Part I. particles. The paths of light rays determine a con- In the following section we will investigate the formal structure (light cone at each point) on a conditions imposed on a geometrical framework by differentiate manifold. The paths of massive par- the requirement that it leads to a consistent physical ticles determine a set of autoparallel curves (a pro- interpretation. To facilitate this discussion, we clas- jective structure). EPS discovered that these struc- sify the specializations of the spacetime manifold tures taken together already determine the differenti- (L4, g) as follows (see also Figure 1) : ate and affine structure of spacetime.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Projective Geometry: a Short Introduction
    Projective Geometry: A Short Introduction Lecture Notes Edmond Boyer Master MOSIG Introduction to Projective Geometry Contents 1 Introduction 2 1.1 Objective . .2 1.2 Historical Background . .3 1.3 Bibliography . .4 2 Projective Spaces 5 2.1 Definitions . .5 2.2 Properties . .8 2.3 The hyperplane at infinity . 12 3 The projective line 13 3.1 Introduction . 13 3.2 Projective transformation of P1 ................... 14 3.3 The cross-ratio . 14 4 The projective plane 17 4.1 Points and lines . 17 4.2 Line at infinity . 18 4.3 Homographies . 19 4.4 Conics . 20 4.5 Affine transformations . 22 4.6 Euclidean transformations . 22 4.7 Particular transformations . 24 4.8 Transformation hierarchy . 25 Grenoble Universities 1 Master MOSIG Introduction to Projective Geometry Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Objective The objective of this course is to give basic notions and intuitions on projective geometry. The interest of projective geometry arises in several visual comput- ing domains, in particular computer vision modelling and computer graphics. It provides a mathematical formalism to describe the geometry of cameras and the associated transformations, hence enabling the design of computational ap- proaches that manipulates 2D projections of 3D objects. In that respect, a fundamental aspect is the fact that objects at infinity can be represented and manipulated with projective geometry and this in contrast to the Euclidean geometry. This allows perspective deformations to be represented as projective transformations. Figure 1.1: Example of perspective deformation or 2D projective transforma- tion. Another argument is that Euclidean geometry is sometimes difficult to use in algorithms, with particular cases arising from non-generic situations (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 3: Geometry
    E-320: Teaching Math with a Historical Perspective Oliver Knill, 2010-2015 Lecture 3: Geometry Geometry is the science of shape, size and symmetry. While arithmetic dealt with numerical structures, geometry deals with metric structures. Geometry is one of the oldest mathemati- cal disciplines and early geometry has relations with arithmetics: we have seen that that the implementation of a commutative multiplication on the natural numbers is rooted from an inter- pretation of n × m as an area of a shape that is invariant under rotational symmetry. Number systems built upon the natural numbers inherit this. Identities like the Pythagorean triples 32 +42 = 52 were interpreted geometrically. The right angle is the most "symmetric" angle apart from 0. Symmetry manifests itself in quantities which are invariant. Invariants are one the most central aspects of geometry. Felix Klein's Erlanger program uses symmetry to classify geome- tries depending on how large the symmetries of the shapes are. In this lecture, we look at a few results which can all be stated in terms of invariants. In the presentation as well as the worksheet part of this lecture, we will work us through smaller miracles like special points in triangles as well as a couple of gems: Pythagoras, Thales,Hippocrates, Feuerbach, Pappus, Morley, Butterfly which illustrate the importance of symmetry. Much of geometry is based on our ability to measure length, the distance between two points. A modern way to measure distance is to determine how long light needs to get from one point to the other. This geodesic distance generalizes to curved spaces like the sphere and is also a practical way to measure distances, for example with lasers.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes 20: Afine Geometry
    Notes 20: Afine Geometry Example 1. Let C be the curve in R2 defined by x2 + 4xy + y2 + y2 − 1 = 0 = (x + 2y)2 + y2 − 1: If we set u = x + 2y; v = y; we obtain u2 + v2 − 1 = 0 which is a circle in the u; v plane. Let 2 2 F : R ! R ; (x; y) 7! (u = 2x + y; v = y): We look at the geometry of F: Angles: This transformation does not preserve angles. For example the line 2x + y = 0 is mapped to the line u = 0; and the line y = 0 is mapped to v = 0: The two lines in the x − y plane are not orthogonal, while the lines in the u − v plane are orthogonal. Distances: This transformation does not preserve distance. The point A = (−1=2; 1) is mapped to a = (0; 1) and the point B = (0; 0) is mapped to b = (0; 0): the distance AB is not equal to the distance ab: Circles: The curve C is an ellipse with axis along the lines 2x + y = 0 and x = 0: It is mapped to the unit circle in the u − v plane. Lines: The map is a one-to-one onto map that maps lines to lines. What is a Geometry? We can think of a geometry as having three parts: A set of points, a special set of subsets called lines, and a group of transformations of the set of points that maps lines to lines. In the case of Euclidean geometry, the set of points is the familiar plane R2: The special subsets are what we ordinarily call lines.
    [Show full text]
  • (Finite Affine Geometry) References • Bennett, Affine An
    MATHEMATICS 152, FALL 2003 METHODS OF DISCRETE MATHEMATICS Outline #7 (Finite Affine Geometry) References • Bennett, Affine and Projective Geometry, Chapter 3. This book, avail- able in Cabot Library, covers all the proofs and has nice diagrams. • “Faculty Senate Affine Geometry”(attached). This has all the steps for each proof, but no diagrams. There are numerous references to diagrams on the course Web site, however, and the combination of this document and the Web site should be all that you need. • The course Web site, AffineDiagrams folder. This has links that bring up step-by-step diagrams for all key results. These diagrams will be available in class, and you are welcome to use them instead of drawing new diagrams on the blackboard. • The Windows application program affine.exe, which can be downloaded from the course Web site. • Data files for the small, medium, and large affine senates. These accom- pany affine.exe, since they are data files read by that program. The file affine.zip has everything. • PHP version of the affine geometry software. This program, written by Harvard undergraduate Luke Gustafson, runs directly off the Web and generates nice diagrams whenever you use affine geometry to do arithmetic. It also has nice built-in documentation. Choose the PHP- Programs folder on the Web site. 1. State the first four of the five axioms for a finite affine plane, using the terms “instructor” and “committee” instead of “point” and “line.” For A4 (Desargues), draw diagrams (or show the ones on the Web site) to illustrate the two cases (three parallel lines and three concurrent lines) in the Euclidean plane.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 5: Affine Graphics a Connect the Dots Approach to Two-Dimensional Computer Graphics
    Lecture 5: Affine Graphics A Connect the Dots Approach to Two-Dimensional Computer Graphics The lines are fallen unto me in pleasant places; Psalms 16:6 1. Two Shortcomings of Turtle Graphics Two points determine a line. In Turtle Graphics we use this simple fact to draw a line joining the two points at which the turtle is located before and after the execution of each FORWARD command. By programming the turtle to move about and to draw lines in this fashion, we are able to generate some remarkable figures in the plane. Nevertheless, the turtle has two annoying idiosyncrasies. First, the turtle has no memory, so the order in which the turtle encounters points is crucial. Thus, even though the turtle leaves behind a trace of her path, there is no direct command in LOGO to return the turtle to an arbitrary previously encountered location. Second, the turtle is blissfully unaware of the outside universe. The turtle carries her own local coordinate system -- her state -- but the turtle does not know her position relative to any other point in the plane. Turtle geometry is a local, intrinsic geometry; the turtle knows nothing of the extrinsic, global geometry of the external world. The turtle can draw a circle, but the turtle has no idea where the center of the circle might be or even that there is such a concept as a center, a point outside her path around the circumference. These two shortcomings -- no memory and no knowledge of the outside world -- often make the turtle cumbersome to program.
    [Show full text]
  • Essential Concepts of Projective Geomtry
    Essential Concepts of Projective Geomtry Course Notes, MA 561 Purdue University August, 1973 Corrected and supplemented, August, 1978 Reprinted and revised, 2007 Department of Mathematics University of California, Riverside 2007 Table of Contents Preface : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : i Prerequisites: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :iv Suggestions for using these notes : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :v I. Synthetic and analytic geometry: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :1 1. Axioms for Euclidean geometry : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 1 2. Cartesian coordinate interpretations : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 2 2 3 3. Lines and planes in R and R : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 3 II. Affine geometry : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 7 1. Synthetic affine geometry : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 7 2. Affine subspaces of vector spaces : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 13 3. Affine bases: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :19 4. Properties of coordinate
    [Show full text]
  • Affine Geometry
    CHAPTER II AFFINE GEOMETRY In the previous chapter we indicated how several basic ideas from geometry have natural interpretations in terms of vector spaces and linear algebra. This chapter continues the process of formulating basic geometric concepts in such terms. It begins with standard material, moves on to consider topics not covered in most courses on classical deductive geometry or analytic geometry, and it concludes by giving an abstract formulation of the concept of geometrical incidence and closely related issues. 1. Synthetic affine geometry In this section we shall consider some properties of Euclidean spaces which only depend upon the axioms of incidence and parallelism Definition. A three-dimensional incidence space is a triple (S; L; P) consisting of a nonempty set S (whose elements are called points) and two nonempty disjoint families of proper subsets of S denoted by L (lines) and P (planes) respectively, which satisfy the following conditions: (I { 1) Every line (element of L) contains at least two points, and every plane (element of P) contains at least three points. (I { 2) If x and y are distinct points of S, then there is a unique line L such that x; y 2 L. Notation. The line given by (I {2) is called xy. (I { 3) If x, y and z are distinct points of S and z 62 xy, then there is a unique plane P such that x; y; z 2 P . (I { 4) If a plane P contains the distinct points x and y, then it also contains the line xy. (I { 5) If P and Q are planes with a nonempty intersection, then P \ Q contains at least two points.
    [Show full text]
  • References Finite Affine Geometry
    MATHEMATICS S-152, SUMMER 2005 THE MATHEMATICS OF SYMMETRY Outline #7 (Finite Affine Geometry) References • Bennett, Affine and Projective Geometry, Chapter 3. This book, avail- able in Cabot Library, covers all the proofs and has nice diagrams. • “Faculty Senate Affine Geometry” (attached). This has all the steps for each proof, but no diagrams. There are numerous references to diagrams on the course web site; however, and the combination of this document and the web site should be all that you need. • The course web site, AffineDiagrams folder. This has links that bring up step-by-step diagrams for all key results. These diagrams will be available in class, and you are welcome to use them instead of drawing new diagrams on the blackboard. • The Windows application program, affine.exe, which can be down- loaded from the course web site. • Data files for the small, medium, and large affine senates. These ac- company affine.exe, since they are data files read by that program. The file affine.zip has everything. • PHP version of the affine geometry software. This program, written by Harvard undergraduate Luke Gustafson, runs directly off the web and generates nice diagrams whenever you use affine geometry to do arithmetic. It also has nice built-in documentation. Choose the PHP- Programs folder on the web site. Finite Affine Geometry 1. State the first four of the five axioms for a finite affine plane, using the terms “instructor” and “committee” instead of “point” and “line.” For A4 (Desargues), draw diagrams (or show the ones on the web site) to 1 illustrate the two cases (three parallel lines and three concurrent lines) in the Euclidean plane.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of the Development of Geometry up to 1870
    A Survey of the Development of Geometry up to 1870∗ Eldar Straume Department of mathematical sciences Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) N-9471 Trondheim, Norway September 4, 2014 Abstract This is an expository treatise on the development of the classical ge- ometries, starting from the origins of Euclidean geometry a few centuries BC up to around 1870. At this time classical differential geometry came to an end, and the Riemannian geometric approach started to be developed. Moreover, the discovery of non-Euclidean geometry, about 40 years earlier, had just been demonstrated to be a ”true” geometry on the same footing as Euclidean geometry. These were radically new ideas, but henceforth the importance of the topic became gradually realized. As a consequence, the conventional attitude to the basic geometric questions, including the possible geometric structure of the physical space, was challenged, and foundational problems became an important issue during the following decades. Such a basic understanding of the status of geometry around 1870 enables one to study the geometric works of Sophus Lie and Felix Klein at the beginning of their career in the appropriate historical perspective. arXiv:1409.1140v1 [math.HO] 3 Sep 2014 Contents 1 Euclideangeometry,thesourceofallgeometries 3 1.1 Earlygeometryandtheroleoftherealnumbers . 4 1.1.1 Geometric algebra, constructivism, and the real numbers 7 1.1.2 Thedownfalloftheancientgeometry . 8 ∗This monograph was written up in 2008-2009, as a preparation to the further study of the early geometrical works of Sophus Lie and Felix Klein at the beginning of their career around 1870. The author apologizes for possible historiographic shortcomings, errors, and perhaps lack of updated information on certain topics from the history of mathematics.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Euclidean Geometry
    Dr. Anna Felikson, Durham University Geometry, 16.10.2018 Outline 1 Euclidean geometry 1.1 Isometry group of Euclidean plane, Isom(E2). A distance on a space X is a function d : X × X ! R,(A; B) 7! d(A; B) for A; B 2 X satisfying 1. d(A; B) ≥ 0 (d(A; B) = 0 , A = B); 2. d(A; B) = d(B; A); 3. d(A; C) ≤ d(A; B) + d(B; C) (triangle inequality). We will use two models of Euclidean plane: p 2 2 a Cartesian plane: f(x; y) j x; y 2 Rg with the distance d(A1;A2) = (x1 − x2) + (y1 − y2) ; a Gaussian plane: fz j z 2 Cg, with the distance d(u; v) = ju − vj. Definition 1.1. A Euclidean isometry is a distance-preserving transformation of E2, i.e. a map f : E2 ! E2 satisfying d(f(A); f(B)) = d(A; B). Thm 1.2. (a) Every isometry of E2 is a one-to-one map. (b) A composition of any two isometries is an isometry. (c) Isometries of E2 form a group (denoted Isom(E2)) with composition as a group operation. Example 1.3: Translation, rotation, reflection in a line, glide reflection are isometries. Definition 1.4. Let ABC be a triangle labelled clock-wise. An isometry f is orientation-preserving if the triangle f(A)f(B)f(C) is also labelled clock-wise. Otherwise, f is orientation-reversing. Proposition 1.5. (correctness of Definition 1.12) Definition 1.4 does not depend on the choice of the triangle ABC.
    [Show full text]
  • Affine Geometry, Visual Sensation, and Preference For
    S S symmetry Article Affine Geometry, Visual Sensation, and Preference for Symmetry of Things in a Thing Birgitta Dresp-Langley ICube Laboratory UMR 7357 CNRS, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg 67000, France; [email protected] Academic Editor: Marco Bertamini Received: 4 August 2016; Accepted: 9 November 2016; Published: 14 November 2016 Abstract: Evolution and geometry generate complexity in similar ways. Evolution drives natural selection while geometry may capture the logic of this selection and express it visually, in terms of specific generic properties representing some kind of advantage. Geometry is ideally suited for expressing the logic of evolutionary selection for symmetry, which is found in the shape curves of vein systems and other natural objects such as leaves, cell membranes, or tunnel systems built by ants. The topology and geometry of symmetry is controlled by numerical parameters, which act in analogy with a biological organism’s DNA. The introductory part of this paper reviews findings from experiments illustrating the critical role of two-dimensional (2D) design parameters, affine geometry and shape symmetry for visual or tactile shape sensation and perception-based decision making in populations of experts and non-experts. It will be shown that 2D fractal symmetry, referred to herein as the “symmetry of things in a thing”, results from principles very similar to those of affine projection. Results from experiments on aesthetic and visual preference judgments in response to 2D fractal trees with varying degrees of asymmetry are presented. In a first experiment (psychophysical scaling procedure), non-expert observers had to rate (on a scale from 0 to 10) the perceived beauty of a random series of 2D fractal trees with varying degrees of fractal symmetry.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Geometry and Spacetime Version 2.7, November 2009
    Notes on Geometry and Spacetime Version 2.7, November 2009 David B. Malament Department of Logic and Philosophy of Science University of California, Irvine [email protected] Contents 1 Preface 2 2 Preliminary Mathematics 2 2.1 Vector Spaces . 3 2.2 Affine Spaces . 6 2.3 Metric Affine Spaces . 15 2.4 Euclidean Geometry . 21 3 Minkowskian Geometry and Its Physical Significance 28 3.1 Minkowskian Geometry { Formal Development . 28 3.2 Minkowskian Geometry { Physical Interpretation . 39 3.3 Uniqueness Result for Minkowskian Angular Measure . 51 3.4 Uniqueness Results for the Relative Simultaneity Relation . 56 4 From Minkowskian Geometry to Hyperbolic Plane Geometry 64 4.1 Tarski's Axioms for first-order Euclidean and Hyperbolic Plane Geometry . 64 4.2 The Hyperboloid Model of Hyperbolic Plane Geometry . 69 These notes have not yet been fully de-bugged. Please read them with caution. (Corrections will be much appreciated.) 1 1 Preface The notes that follow bring together a somewhat unusual collection of topics. In section 3, I discuss the foundations of \special relativity". I emphasize the invariant, \geometrical approach" to the theory, and spend a fair bit of time on one special topic: the status of the relative simultaneity relation within the theory. At issue is whether the standard relation, the one picked out by Einstein's \definition" of simultaneity, is conventional in character, or is rather in some significant sense forced on us. Section 2 is preparatory. When the time comes, I take \Minkowski space- time" to be a four-dimensional affine space endowed with a Lorentzian inner product.
    [Show full text]