DOCSLIB.ORG

Masters Thesis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

WHERE IS THE PUBLIC IN PUBLIC ART? A CASE STUDY OF MILLENNIUM PARK A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree Master of Arts in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Corrinn Conard, B.A. ***** The Ohio State University 2008 Masters Examination Committee: Approved by Dr. James Sanders III, Advisor Advisor Professor Malcolm Cochran Graduate Program in Art Education ABSTRACT For centuries, public art has been a popular tool used to celebrate heroes, commemorate historical events, decorate public spaces, inspire citizens, and attract tourists. Public art has been created by the most renowned artists and commissioned by powerful political leaders. But, where is the public in public art? What is the role of that group believed to be the primary client of such public endeavors? How much power does the public have? Should they have? Do they want? In this thesis, I address these and other related questions through a case study of Millennium Park in Chicago. In contrast to other studies on this topic, this thesis focuses on the perspectives and opinions of the public; a group which I have found to be scarcely represented in the literature about public participation in public art. To reveal public opinion, I have conducted a total of 165 surveys at Millennium Park with both Chicago residents and tourists. I have also collected the voices of Chicagoans as I found them in Chicago’s major media source, The Chicago Tribune . The collection of data from my research reveal a glimpse of the Chicago public’s opinion on public art, its value to them, and their rights and roles in the creation of such endeavors. Surprisingly, this research has transformed, rather than confirmed, personal perceptions I originally held about the public’s relationship with public art. ii Dedicated to My fiancé Greg whose support has been immeasurable throughout this process & My family who has made this accomplishment possible iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would first like to thank my advisor, Dr. James Sanders III, for his incredible assistance and guidance throughout this process. The time and insight that he has given to help strengthen and refine this thesis has been extraordinary. I would also like to thank Professor Malcolm Cochran for donating his time and expertise to be a vital part of my thesis committee. I wish to thank Dr. Margaret Wyszomirski who has been a tremendous mentor throughout my entire graduate career at Ohio State University. The time, advice, consideration, and opportunity that she has given to me over the past three years have been immeasurable. I would like to thank the Art Education department at Ohio State University which has been so helpful throughout my entire time as an Ohio State graduate student. I would especially like to thank Kirsten Thomas, Savenda Fulton, Pat Stuhr, and Dean Karen Bell. I would like to thank Millennium Park Inc. and the Chicago Department of Cultural Affairs who assisted me with my research. I would like to thank the citizens of Chicago who were so eager to share their personal opinions, beliefs, and suggestions with me about Millennium Park, public art, and their own participation experiences. Finally, I would like to thank my loving fiancé, Greg and my entire family who provided the support necessary for me to complete this research. iv VITA January 2, 1978……………………….Born – Columbus, Ohio 2001…………………………………..B.A. History of Art, Ohio State University 2001 – 2005…………………………..Manager, Museum Stores and Publications Columbus Museum of Art Columbus, Ohio 2005 – 2006…………………………..Executive Director Abstract Earth Gallery Columbus, Ohio 2006 – SU2007……………………….Graduate Teaching Associate, The Ohio State University 2006 – SU2007……………………….Research Intern, Ohio Cultural Facilities Commission FIELDS OF STUDY Major Field: Art Education v TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Abstract……….………………………………………………………….………………ii Dedication…………………………………………….………………….……………...iii Acknowledgments…………………………………….………………………..………..iv Vita……………………….…………………………….……………….………………..v List of Figures………………………………………….………………..……………….ix Chapters: INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Discovering the Thesis Topic........................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose of the Study ........................................................................ 4 1.3 Ontological perspective.................................................................... 5 1.4 Epistemological Perspective ............................................................ 6 1.5 Chapter Descriptions........................................................................ 7 1.6 Necessary Considerations ................................................................ 8 REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE .................................................................................. 10 2.1 Thesis Terminology ....................................................................... 10 2.1.1 Defining Public Art ........................................................... 11 2.1.2 Identifying Public Participation ....................................... 12 2.1.3 Defining the Public ........................................................... 17 2.1.4 Veiled Implications of “Public” and “Public Art” .......... 18 2.2 The Importance of Public Participation in Public Art.................... 20 2.3 An Overview of Public Art and Public Participation..................... 23 2.3.1 Public Participation in Politics ........................................ 23 2.3.2 Changes in Art and Public Reaction ................................. 25 2.3.3 Urbanization and its Effects on Public Art ....................... 30 2.4 Evidence of the Public in Public Art.............................................. 33 2.4.1 Controversy is a Voice ...................................................... 33 2.4.2 In the Presence of Public Art ............................................ 38 2.4.3 Speaking through the Media ............................................. 42 2.5 The Private Sector in Public Art .................................................... 43 2.6 Chapter Conclusion........................................................................ 44 METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................... 47 3.1 Case Study Research...................................................................... 48 vi 3.2 Survey Research............................................................................. 49 3.3 Discourse and Textual Analysis..................................................... 51 3.4 Ethnographic Fieldwork................................................................. 52 MILLENNIUM PARK ..................................................................................................... 53 4.1 A Brief History of Public Art in Chicago ...................................... 53 4.2 A Tour of Millennium Park............................................................ 57 4.3 Roots of the Park............................................................................ 68 4.4 A Chicago Tradition of Private Support ........................................ 71 4.5 Why a Millennium Park? ............................................................... 72 4.6 The Creation of Millennium Park .................................................. 76 4.6.1 Fundraising for the Park .................................................. 77 4.6.2 Dipping into Public Funds ................................................ 79 4.6.3 Public Involvement in the Park’s Creation ....................... 80 4.6.4 Excluding the Public in the Park’s Creation .................... 83 4.6.5 Bumps in the Road ............................................................ 85 4.6.6 The Role of the Media in Millennium Park ....................... 89 4.7 Chapter Conclusion........................................................................ 91 FINDING THE PUBLIC IN PUBLIC ART..................................................................... 92 5.1 Demographics of Survey Participants............................................ 94 5.2 Visitation to the Park...................................................................... 95 5.3 Opinions of the Art in the Park ...................................................... 97 5.4 What Participants Want from Public Art ..................................... 100 5.4.1 Art that is Physically and Cognitively Accessibile ......... 103 5.4.2 Art that is Interactive ...................................................... 104 5.4.3 Art that Attracts Attention and Embodies Civic Pride .... 107 5.4.4 Art as a Placemaking Tactic for Chicagoans ................. 108 5.4.5 Art that Offers an Escape ................................................ 110 5.4.6 Art that Educates ............................................................. 110 5.5 Public Participation in Millennium Park and Chicago Public Art Endeavors................................................................................................ 111 ANALYZING THE DATA ............................................................................................ 116 6.1 (Not) Representing Chicago’s Demographics ............................. 116 6.2 (Not) Just About Public Art ......................................................... 122 6.2.1 Public Sentiment toward the Daley Administration ........ 124 6.2.2 Private Donors as a Threat to Public Space .................
Recommended publications
  • Oral History Interview with Ann Wilson, 2009 April 19-2010 July 12

    Oral History Interview with Ann Wilson, 2009 April 19-2010 July 12

    Oral history interview with Ann Wilson, 2009 April 19-2010 July 12 Funding for this interview was provided by the Terra Foundation for American Art. Funding for the digital preservation of this interview was provided by a grant from the Save America's Treasures Program of the National Park Service. Contact Information Reference Department Archives of American Art Smithsonian Institution Washington. D.C. 20560 www.aaa.si.edu/askus Transcript Preface The following oral history transcript is the result of a recorded interview with Ann Wilson on 2009 April 19-2010 July 12. The interview took place at Wilson's home in Valatie, New York, and was conducted by Jonathan Katz for the Archives of American Art, Smithsonian Institution. This transcript has been lightly edited for readability by the Archives of American Art. The reader should bear in mind that they are reading a transcript of spoken, rather than written, prose. Interview ANN WILSON: [In progress] "—happened as if it didn't come out of himself and his fixation but merged. It came to itself and is for this moment without him or her, not brought about by him or her but is itself and in this sudden seeing of itself, we make the final choice. What if it has come to be without external to us and what we read it to be then and heighten it toward that reading? If we were to leave it alone at this point of itself, our eyes aging would no longer be able to see it. External and forget the internal ordering that brought it about and without the final decision of what that ordering was about and our emphasis of it, other eyes would miss the chosen point and feel the lack of emphasis.
  • Lorado Taft Midway Studios AND/OR COMMON Lorado Taft Midway Studios______I LOCATION

    Lorado Taft Midway Studios AND/OR COMMON Lorado Taft Midway Studios______I LOCATION

    Form No. 10-300 (Rev. 10-74) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY -- NOMINATION FORM SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOW TO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS ___________TYPE ALL ENTRIES - COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS______ | NAME HISTORIC Lorado Taft Midway Studios AND/OR COMMON Lorado Taft Midway Studios______________________________ I LOCATION STREET & NUMBER University of Chicago, 6016 Ingleside Avenue —NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY. TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Chicago __ VICINITY OF STATE CODE COUNTY CODE Illinois 05 P.onV CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE _DISTRICT —PUBLIC XXOCCUPIED _ AGRICULTURE —MUSEUM X_BUILDING(S) ?_PRIVATE —UNOCCUPIED —COMMERCIAL —PARK —STRUCTURE —BOTH _ WORK IN PROGRESS ^-EDUCATIONAL —PRIVATE RESIDENCE _ SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE —ENTERTAINMENT —RELIGIOUS —OBJECT —IN PROCESS —YES: RESTRICTED —GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC —BEING CONSIDERED _ YES: UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION _NO —MILITARY —OTHER. (OWNER OF PROPERTY NAMEINAMt University of Chicago, (Office of Special Events, Administration STREET & NUMBER 5801 Ellis Avenue CITY. TOWN STATE VICINITY OF Chicago T1 1 inr>i' a LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE, REGISTRY OF DEEps.ETc. Cook County Recorder and Registrat of Titles STREET & NUMBER 118 North Clark CITY. TOWN STATE Chicago Tllinm', REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE none known DATE — FEDERAL —STATE —COUNTY —LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS CITY. TOWN STATE DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE YY —EXCELLENT _DETERIORATED —UNALTERED —ORIGINAL SITE XXQOOD —RUINS XXALTERED —MOVED DATE_______ —FAIR —UNEXPOSED DESCRIBETHE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE Lorado Taft's wife, Ada Bartlett Taft y described the Midway Studios in her biography of her husband, Lorado Taft, Sculptor arid Citizen; In 1906 Lorado moved his main studio out of the crowded Loop into a large, deserted brick barn on the University of Chicago property on the Midway.
  • Salvador Dalí. De La Inmortal Obra De Cervantes

    Salvador Dalí. De La Inmortal Obra De Cervantes

    12 YEARS OF EXCELLENCE LA COLECCIÓN Salvador Dalí, Don Quijote, 2003. Salvador Dalí, Autobiografía de Ce- llini, 2004. Salvador Dalí, Los ensa- yos de Montaigne, 2005. Francis- co de Goya, Tauromaquia, 2006. Francisco de Goya, Caprichos, 2006. Eduardo Chillida, San Juan de la Cruz, 2007. Pablo Picasso, La Celestina, 2007. Rembrandt, La Biblia, 2008. Eduardo Chillida, So- bre lo que no sé, 2009. Francisco de Goya, Desastres de la guerra, 2009. Vincent van Gogh, Mon cher Théo, 2009. Antonio Saura, El Criti- cón, 2011. Salvador Dalí, Los can- tos de Maldoror, 2011. Miquel Bar- celó, Cahier de félins, 2012. Joan Miró, Homenaje a Gaudí, 2013. Joaquín Sorolla, El mar de Sorolla, 2014. Jaume Plensa, 58, 2015. Artika, 12 years of excellence Índice Artika, 12 years of excellence Index Una edición de: 1/ Salvador Dalí – Don Quijote (2003) An Artika edition: 1/ Salvador Dalí - Don Quijote (2003) Artika 2/ Salvador Dalí - Autobiografía de Cellini (2004) Avenida Diagonal, 662-664 2/ Salvador Dalí - Autobiografía de Cellini (2004) Avenida Diagonal, 662-664 3/ Salvador Dalí - Los ensayos de Montaigne (2005) 08034 Barcelona, Spain 3/ Salvador Dalí - Los ensayos de Montaigne (2005) 08034 Barcelona, España 4/ Francisco de Goya - Tauromaquia (2006) 4/ Francisco de Goya - Tauromaquia (2006) 5/ Francisco de Goya - Caprichos (2006) 5/ Francisco de Goya - Caprichos (2006) 6/ Eduardo Chillida - San Juan de la Cruz (2007) 6/ Eduardo Chillida - San Juan de la Cruz (2007) 7/ Pablo Picasso - La Celestina (2007) Summary 7/ Pablo Picasso - La Celestina (2007) Sumario 8/ Rembrandt - La Biblia (2008) A walk through twelve years in excellence in exclusive art book 8/ Rembrandt - La Biblia (2008) Un recorrido por doce años de excelencia en la edición de 9/ Eduardo Chillida - Sobre lo que no sé (2009) publishing, with unique and limited editions.
  • John Miller, Untitled (March 20, 2020), Ink-Jet Print, 61⁄2 × 9"

    John Miller, Untitled (March 20, 2020), Ink-Jet Print, 61⁄2 × 9"

    John Miller, Untitled (March 20, 2020), ink-jet print, 61⁄2 × 9". Tony Rosenthal, 5 in 1, 1973–74. ON SITE CROSSED PATHS Alex Kitnick on the public art of Lower Manhattan August 2020 print issue THE MUSEUEMS ARE CLOSED but the sculptures are still there. Memorials and monuments, too. If you’re in Lower Manhattan, you can ramble along the Irish Hunger Memorial’s serpentine path, a rugged simulacrum of peat and stone. I’ve never been to Ireland, but I take it that parts of it look like this. The strangeness of the work is its location in Battery Park City, where since 2002 it has sat like a souvenir between corporate towers, with the Hudson River stretching out to the west. Robert Smithson called certain of his sculptures “nonsites” to denote their difference from the sites whence they came: A pile of shale in a steel trough in the middle of a gallery stood as a nonsite to a quarry somewhere off in New Jersey. The Irish Hunger Memorial has always struck me as a massive nonsite, a memory displaced and brought over from elsewhere, now made even stranger since the host site is no longer what it was. An eastward walk takes you to Federal Plaza, where Richard Serra’s Tilted Arc once stood. For most of the 1980s (I never saw it in person), the sculpture cut a steely line across the cobbled space, casting stark shadows, collecting graffiti and pee. Many office workers didn’t like it because it obstructed the building’s entrance, but certain judges looked out the window and saw a threat—a cover for bomb throwers or a simple sign of menace.
  • DCASE Public Art Self-Guided Tour Packet (PDF)

    DCASE Public Art Self-Guided Tour Packet (PDF)

    DCASE Public Art Tour Works of art: Randolph/Garland Ct. (We Will) Millennium Park: Boeing Gallery North (Screenhouse) (Cloud Gate) Boeing Gallery South (Christine Tarkowski) (Crown Fountain) Chicago Cultural Center: 78 E. Washington (Bronze Cow) Garland Court (Rushmore) SW corner of Randolph & Garland Ct. • Title: We Will (2005) • Artist: Richard Hunt, (born 1935, Chicago.) • Artist info: o Graduated from School of the Art Institute of Chicago. o Over 150 commissioned works. o 1st African-American sculptor to have a major solo exhibition at the Museum of Modern Art in New York o 1968 appointed by Pres. Lyndon Johnson to serve on the National Council on the Arts. o In 2015 (his 80th bday) CCC exhibited 60 pieces of his work, representing his career. • About the work: o Welded stainless steel o 35’H x 8’W x 8’D o Commissioned by the developers of the Heritage building (condos/retail) o “Leaps from its stippled metal pedestal like a flame dancing in the breeze.”--Blogger o Artist quote: “In some works it is my intention to develop the kind of forms Nature might create if only heat and steel were available to her.” o The artist is currently creating a monument to Ida B. Wells, an early leader in the Civil Rights movement and a founder of the NAACP. (Walk to E side of CCC and cross Michigan Ave. at Washington to Boeing Gallery North, S. of Randolph, E. of Michigan) Millennium Park • Opened in 2004, the 24.5 acre Millennium Park was an industrial wasteland transformed into a world- class public park.
  • PUBLIC DRAFT MAY 2019 Was Created By

    PUBLIC DRAFT MAY 2019 Was Created By

    PUBLIC DRAFT MAY 2019 was created by: MISSOULA DOWNTOWN ASSOCIATION BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT MISSOULA DOWNTOWN FOUNDATION The Downtown Missoula Partnership Dover, Kohl & Partners a collaboration of: planning team lead | town planning & urban design The Downtown Business Improvement District of Missoula Six Pony Hitch branding and outreach Missoula Downtown Association Territorial Landworks Missoula Downtown Foundation infrastructure Other major partners on this project include: Kimley Horn parking Missoula Redevelopment Agency Charlier Associates, Inc. Missoula Parking Commission transportation City of Missoula Cascadia Partners scenario planning Gibbs Planning Group retail market analysis Daedalus Advisory Services economics Urban Advantage photo simulations ... and thousands of participants from the Missoula community! Missoula’s Downtown Master Plan | Draft Steering Committee Our thanks to the following leaders who guided this process through the Master Plan Steering Committee and Technical Advisory Committee: Ellen Buchanan, Chair, Missoula Redevelopment Mike Haynes, Development Services Director Agency Donna Gaukler, Missoula Parks & Recreation Director Matt Ellis, Co-Chair, MDA & MPC Board Member Jim McLeod, Farran Realty Partners Owner Dale Bickell, City Chief Administrative Officer Eran Pehan, Housing & Community Development Dan Cederberg, Property Owner; BID Board, MDF Director Board Dave Strohmaier, Missoula County Commissioner Nick Checota, Property/Business Owner; Arts & Bryan Von Lossberg, Missoula City Council Entertainment
  • America's Catholic Church"

    America's Catholic Church"

    rfHE NATION'S CAPITAL CELEBRArfES 505 YEARS OF DISCOVERY HONORING THE GREA1" DISCOVERER CHRISTOPHER COLUMBUS MONDAY OCTOBER 12. 1998 THE COLUMBUS MEMORIAL COLUMBUS PI~AZA - UNION STATION. W ASIIlNGTON. D.C. SPONSORED BY THE WASHINGTON COLUMBUS CELEBRATION ASSOCIATION IN COORDINATION WITH THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE CELEBRATING CHRISTOPHER COLUMBUS IN THE NATION'S CAPITAL The Site In the years following the great quadricentennial (400th anniversary) celebration in 1892 of the achievements and discoveries of Christopher Cohnnbus, an effort was launched by the Knights of ~ Columbus to establish a monument to the ~ great discoverer. The U. S. Congress passed a law which mandated a Colwnbus Memorial in the nation's capital and appropriated $100,000 to cover the ~· ~, ·~-~=:;-;~~ construction costs. A commission was T" established composed of the secretaries of State and War, the chairmen of the House and Senate Committees on the Library of Congress, and the Supreme Knight of the Knights of Columbus. With the newly completed Union Railroad Station in 1907, plans focused toward locating the memorial on the plaz.a in front of this great edifice. After a series of competitions, sculptor Lorado Z. Taft of Chicago was awarded the contract. His plan envisioned what you see this day, a monument constructed of Georgia marble; a semi-circular fountain sixty-six feet broad and forty-four feet deep and in the center, a pylon crowned with a globe supported by four eagles oonnected by garland. A fifteen foot statue of Columbus, facing the U. S. Capitol and wrapped in!\ medieval mantle, stands in front of the pylon in the bow of a ship with its pn,, extending into the upper basin of the fountain terminating with a winged figurehead representing democracy.
  • Climate Changing: on Artists, Institutions, and the Social Environment

    Climate Changing: on Artists, Institutions, and the Social Environment

    i CLIMATE CHANGING CLIMATE WHY CAN’T YOU TELL ME SCORE WHAT YOU NEED Somewhere our body needs party favors attending sick and resting temperatures times hot unevens twice I ask myself all the time too ward draw pop left under right Just try and squeeze me. Pause. What would you do? Fall down off my feet and try waking tired ex muses Like, you either know I can and work on it with me Or know I can’t and wouldn’t want your baby to go through what I have to go through Over prepared for three nights. Over it all scared for three nights. Tell me the unwell of never been better. Are we still good? Are we still good? TABLE OF CONTENTS Director’s Foreword 4 Johanna Burton A Climate for Changing 6 Lucy I. Zimmerman On Chris Burden’s Wexner Castle 10 Lucy I. Zimmerman Notes on Chris Burden’s Through the Night Softly 15 Pope.L WE LEFT THEM NOTHING 17 Demian DinéYazhi´ Untitled 21 Jibade-Khalil Huffman Scores 1, 3, 13, 23, 27, 50 Park McArthur and Constantina Zavitsanos Questioning Access 25 Advisory Committee Roundtable Discussion Artists in the Exhibition 29 Acknowledgments 47 3 BLANKET (STATEMENT) SCORE Why can’t you just tell me what you need DIRECTOR’S FOREWORD 4 Johanna Burton, Executive Director Opening in the first month of 2021 (or at least set to committee’s roundtable discussion further explores, open then at the time of this writing), Climate Changing: the exhibition intends not to inventory nor propose On Artists, Institutions, and the Social Environment solutions for these considerable challenges, but rather comes at a time of great uncertainty for cultural or- to provide artists a forum for bringing the issues into ganizations.
  • Oral History Interview with Howardena Pindell, 2012 Dec. 1-4

    Oral History Interview with Howardena Pindell, 2012 Dec. 1-4

    Oral history interview with Howardena Pindell, 2012 Dec. 1-4 Contact Information Reference Department Archives of American Art Smithsonian Institution Washington. D.C. 20560 www.aaa.si.edu/askus Transcript Preface The following oral history transcript is the result of a recorded interview with Howardena Pindell on December 1, 2012. The interview took place at the home of Howardena Pindell in New York City, and was conducted by Judith O. Richards for the Archives of American Art, Smithsonian Institution. Howardena Pindell has reviewed the transcript. Her corrections and emendations appear below in brackets with initials. This transcript has been lightly edited for readability by the Archives of American Art. The reader should bear in mind that they are reading a transcript of spoken, rather than written, prose. Interview JUDITH RICHARDS: This is Judith Richards, interviewing Howardena Pindell on December 1, 2012, at her home in New York City on Riverside Drive, for the Archives of American Art, Smithsonian Institution, disk one. Howardena, as we've discussed, we're going to begin where a previous interview for the archives left off. That interview was on July 10, 1972. [Laughs.] So casting way back to 1972, I wanted to, first of all, ask some basic questions. HOWARDENA PINDELL: Mm-hmm [Affirmative.] JUDITH RICHARDS: Where were you living in 1972? Had you moved into Westbeth by then? HOWARDENA PINDELL: All right— JUDITH RICHARDS: Or were you living in— HOWARDENA PINDELL: —I was in Westbeth. JUDITH RICHARDS: And when did you move in there? Were you one of the first tenants? HOWARDENA PINDELL: One of the first tenants, yes.
  • Bay Area Economics Draft Report – Study Of

    Bay Area Economics Draft Report – Study Of

    DRAFT REPORT Study of Alternatives to Housing For the Funding of Brooklyn Bridge Park Operations Presented by: BAE Urban Economics Presented to: Brooklyn Bridge Park Committee on Alternatives to Housing (CAH) February 22, 2011 Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................... i Introduction and Approach ........................................................................................... 1 Committee on Alternatives to Housing (CAH) Process ............................................................ 1 Report Purpose and Organization ............................................................................................. 2 Topics Outside the Scope of the CAH and this Report ............................................................. 3 Report Methodology ................................................................................................................. 4 Limiting Conditions .................................................................................................................. 4 Park Overview and the Current Plan ............................................................................ 5 The Park Setting and Plan ......................................................................................................... 5 Park Governance ....................................................................................................................... 6 The Current Financing Plan .....................................................................................................
  • October 31, 2019 by ELECTRONIC MAIL Mark Kelly, Commissioner

    October 31, 2019 by ELECTRONIC MAIL Mark Kelly, Commissioner

    October 31, 2019 BY ELECTRONIC MAIL Mark Kelly, Commissioner Chicago Department of Cultural Affairs and Special Events 78 E. Washington St., 4th Floor Chicago, IL 60602 [email protected] Re: Unconstitutional Regulation of Millennium Park Dear Mr. Kelly: I write regarding the conduct of security personnel at Refuse Fascism’s October 26, 2019 protest in Millennium Park (the “Park”). Based on witness accounts, Park security made unconstitutional demands of protesters, some of which were based on unconstitutional provisions of the August 26, 2019 Millennium Park Rules (the “Rules”) promulgated by the Department of Cultural Affairs and Special Events (DCASE). 1 I ask for your assurances that such restrictions will not be imposed at future protests, including Refuse Fascism’s demonstrations planned for the next three Saturdays. Public parks are traditional public forums that “have immemorially been held in trust for the use of the public and, time out of mind, have been used for purposes of assembly, communicating thoughts between citizens, and discussing public questions.” Perry Ed. Assn. v. Perry Local Educators' Assn., 460 U.S. 37, 45 (1983) (quoting Hague v. Committee for Industrial Organization, 307 U.S. 496, 515 (1939)). In such places, the government’s authority to restrict speech is limited to “regulations of the time, place, and manner of expression which are content-neutral, are narrowly tailored to serve a significant government interest, and leave open ample alternative channels of communication.” Perry, 460 U.S. at 45. On October 26, Park security officers went well beyond the government’s constitutional authority to regulate speech in a public park.
  • Strategic Plan

    Strategic Plan

    STRATEGIC PLAN FOR REALIZING THE WATERFRONT SEATTLE VISION Prepared for the Mayor of Seattle and the Seattle City Council by the Central Waterfront Committee – July 2012 Created in collaboration with CONTRIBUTORS & CONTENTS “When you look at a city, it’s like reading the hopes, aspirations and pride of everyone who built it.” – Hugh Newell Jacobsen Contributors The Strategic Plan was developed by the volunteer community representatives and leaders who make up the Central Waterfront Committee. The Committee was created by the City of Seattle to advise the Mayor and City Council on the Waterfront Improvement Program, with broad oversight of design, financing, public engagement, and long-term operations and maintenance. Central Waterfront Committee Executive Committee Charley Royer, co-chair Charley Royer, co-chair Maggie Walker, co-chair Maggie Walker, co-chair Tom Bancroft Patrick Gordon Carol Binder Mark Reddington Mahlon Clements David Freiboth Toby Crittenden Ed Medeiros Bob Davidson Gerry Johnson Bob Donegan John Nesholm Rollin Fatland Carol Binder Erin Fletcher (Slayton) Bob Davidson Ben Franz-Knight David Freiboth Design Oversight Subcommittee Gary Glant Patrick Gordon, co-chair Patrick Gordon Mark Reddington, co-chair Craig Hanway Bob Donegan Gerry Johnson Cary Moon Greg Johnson Vlad Oustimovitch Bob Klein Brian Steinburg Alex Kochan Martha Wyckoff Ed Medeiros Rebecca Barnes, Advisor Dave Meinert Liz Dunn, Advisor Nate Miles Jeff Hou, Advisor Cary Moon Jon Houghton, Advisor John Nesholm Chris Rogers, Advisor Jan O’Connor Vlad Oustimovitch