DOCSLIB.ORG

Modelling Natural Resource Responses to Climate Change (MONARCH)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Modelling Natural Resource Responses to Climate Change (MONARCH) Modelling Natural Resource Responses to Climate Change (MONARCH) A Local Approach Development of a conceptual and methodological framework for universal application Edited by P.M. Berry, P.A. Harrison T.P. Dawson and C.A. Walmsley ii This report should be referenced as: Berry, P.M., Harrison, P.A., Dawson, T.P. and Walmsley, C.A. (Eds.) (2005). Modelling Natural Resource Responses to Climate Change (MONARCH): A Local Approach. UKCIP Technical Report, Oxford. iii CONTENTS Executive summary..................................................................................................................... vii Chapters: 1. Introduction, project aims and methods .................................................................................1 P.M Berry, P.A. Harrison, J.E. Hossell and G.J. Masters 1.1 Introduction................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Aims............................................................................................................................................ 2 1.3 Methods...................................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Project partners ........................................................................................................................... 8 1.5 References................................................................................................................................... 9 2. Bioclimatic classification and case study selection..............................................................13 J.E. Hossell, A.E. Riding and P.A. Harrison Summary........................................................................................................................................... 13 2.1 Introduction............................................................................................................................... 13 2.2 Bioclimatic classification method............................................................................................. 14 2.3 Bioclimatic classification results.............................................................................................. 14 2.4 Conservation characterisation................................................................................................... 19 2.5 Identification of climatically sensitive areas............................................................................. 22 2.6 Selected case study areas .......................................................................................................... 27 2.7 Selection of habitats and species............................................................................................... 27 2.8 Bioclimatic classification of the case study areas..................................................................... 28 2.9 Uncertainty in future climate change projections ..................................................................... 30 2.10 Discussion and conclusions ...................................................................................................... 36 2.11 References................................................................................................................................. 36 Chapter 2 Annex............................................................................................................................... 37 3. Species distribution and dispersal modelling ....................................................................... 43 P.A. Harrison, R.G. Pearson, T.P. Dawson, S. Freeman, J.E. Hossell, H. Lyons, P. Scholefield and P.M. Berry Summary........................................................................................................................................... 43 3.1 Introduction............................................................................................................................... 43 3.2 SPECIES model........................................................................................................................ 44 3.3 Downscaled SPECIES model ................................................................................................... 46 3.4 Land cover change scenarios .................................................................................................... 49 3.5 Dispersal model ........................................................................................................................ 52 3.6 Discussion and conclusions ...................................................................................................... 56 3.6 References................................................................................................................................. 59 Chapter 3 Annex............................................................................................................................... 63 iv 4. Implications for the Composition of Species Communities.................................................68 G. Masters and N. Ward Summary........................................................................................................................................... 68 4.1 Introduction............................................................................................................................... 68 4.2 The species Arriver and Leaver conceptual models ................................................................. 68 4.3 The application of the Arriver and Leaver conceptual models ................................................ 72 4.4 Discussion................................................................................................................................. 73 4.5 References................................................................................................................................. 73 5. Impacts on coastal environments..........................................................................................74 G.E. Austin and M.M. Rehfisch Summary........................................................................................................................................... 74 5.1 Introduction............................................................................................................................... 74 5.2 Methods.................................................................................................................................... 75 5.3 Suffolk coastline case study...................................................................................................... 85 5.4 Discussion and conclusions ...................................................................................................... 96 5.5 References................................................................................................................................. 98 6. Impacts for the Hampshire case study area ........................................................................102 J.E. Hossell, G.E. Austin, P.M. Berry, N. Butt, H.Q.P. Crick, S. Freeman, P.A. Harrison, G.J. Masters, A. Morrison, M.M. Rehfisch, P. Scholefield, N. Ward And I. Wilde Summary......................................................................................................................................... 102 6.1 Introduction............................................................................................................................. 103 6.2 Bioclimatic classification........................................................................................................ 103 6.3 Land cover changes................................................................................................................. 107 6.4 Beech hangers ......................................................................................................................... 110 6.5 Wet heathland......................................................................................................................... 128 6.6 Estuarine waterbirds................................................................................................................ 140 6.7 Discussion and conclusions .................................................................................................... 144 6.8 References............................................................................................................................... 145 7. Impacts for the Central Highlands case study area ............................................................148 P.M. Berry, N. Butt, H.P.Q. Crick, S. Freeman, P.A. Harrison, J.E. Hossell, G. Masters, P. Scholefield and N. Ward Summary......................................................................................................................................... 148 7.1 Introduction............................................................................................................................. 149 7.2 Bioclimatic classification........................................................................................................ 149 7.3 Land cover changes................................................................................................................. 159 7.4 Caledonian pine woodland...................................................................................................... 159 7.5 Montane/upland heath............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ARTHROPOD COMMUNITIES and PASSERINE DIET: EFFECTS of SHRUB EXPANSION in WESTERN ALASKA by Molly Tankersley Mcdermott, B.A./B.S
    Arthropod communities and passerine diet: effects of shrub expansion in Western Alaska Item Type Thesis Authors McDermott, Molly Tankersley Download date 26/09/2021 06:13:39 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/7893 ARTHROPOD COMMUNITIES AND PASSERINE DIET: EFFECTS OF SHRUB EXPANSION IN WESTERN ALASKA By Molly Tankersley McDermott, B.A./B.S. A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Biological Sciences University of Alaska Fairbanks August 2017 APPROVED: Pat Doak, Committee Chair Greg Breed, Committee Member Colleen Handel, Committee Member Christa Mulder, Committee Member Kris Hundertmark, Chair Department o f Biology and Wildlife Paul Layer, Dean College o f Natural Science and Mathematics Michael Castellini, Dean of the Graduate School ABSTRACT Across the Arctic, taller woody shrubs, particularly willow (Salix spp.), birch (Betula spp.), and alder (Alnus spp.), have been expanding rapidly onto tundra. Changes in vegetation structure can alter the physical habitat structure, thermal environment, and food available to arthropods, which play an important role in the structure and functioning of Arctic ecosystems. Not only do they provide key ecosystem services such as pollination and nutrient cycling, they are an essential food source for migratory birds. In this study I examined the relationships between the abundance, diversity, and community composition of arthropods and the height and cover of several shrub species across a tundra-shrub gradient in northwestern Alaska. To characterize nestling diet of common passerines that occupy this gradient, I used next-generation sequencing of fecal matter. Willow cover was strongly and consistently associated with abundance and biomass of arthropods and significant shifts in arthropod community composition and diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Methods and Work Profile
    REVIEW OF THE KNOWN AND POTENTIAL BIODIVERSITY IMPACTS OF PHYTOPHTHORA AND THE LIKELY IMPACT ON ECOSYSTEM SERVICES JANUARY 2011 Simon Conyers Kate Somerwill Carmel Ramwell John Hughes Ruth Laybourn Naomi Jones Food and Environment Research Agency Sand Hutton, York, YO41 1LZ 2 CONTENTS Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 8 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 13 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................ 13 1.2 Objectives .......................................................................................................................... 15 2. Review of the potential impacts on species of higher trophic groups .................... 16 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 16 2.2 Methods ............................................................................................................................. 16 2.3 Results ............................................................................................................................... 17 2.4 Discussion .......................................................................................................................... 44 3. Review of the potential impacts on ecosystem services .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Aculeate Conservation Group/ Hymettus Report for 2006
    Aculeate Conservation Group/ Hymettus Report for 2006 1. Background to 2006 Research. 1.1 During 2006 a new body, Hymettus Ltd., was constituted. Hymettus will take over and extend the role of the Aculeate Conservation Group. This report deals with research originally agreed at the 2005 ACG Annual Review and funded by English Nature (now also re-incarnated as Natural England), but executed under Hymettus Ltd.. During 2006 work was financially supported by English Nature, Earthwatch, Syngenta and the RSPB in accordance with the relevant Annex a documents, which see for details. 1.2 2005 Projects are reported in the following order of taxonomic group: ants, wasps, bees, other projects. 2. Ant Projects. 2.1 Formica exsecta 2.1.1 At the 2005 Review meeting Stephen Caroll was asked to enquire of the Devon Trust as to whether they would be prepared to consider looking at the possibility of proposing a landscape project for the Bovey Basin which would include the habitat requirements of Formica exsecta and , if so, whether a contribution from the ACG towards the costs of looking at this would be appropriate. 2.1.2 The Trust received this request enthusiastically and have submitted a copy of Andrew Taylor’s (their Officer) Report. Stephen Caroll will be able to bring us up to date with developments at the Review meting. The Report is presented here (appendices may be obtained from Mike Edwards): Landscape-scale habitat work in Devon’s Bovey Basin Report to Hymettus Limited, October 2006 1. Introduction The Bovey Basin is located in the Teignbridge district of South Devon.
    [Show full text]
  • Testing Agricultural Impacts on Breeding Ground Food Resources As a Driver of Cuckoo Population Decline
    Testing agricultural impacts on breeding ground food resources as a driver of cuckoo population decline Submitted by Lowell John Mills to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biological Sciences, March 2019 This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other university. 1 2 Image: Charles Tyler “The first picture of you, The first picture of summer, Seeing the flowers scream their joy.” - The Lotus Eaters (1983) 3 4 Abstract The common cuckoo Cuculus canorus has undergone a striking divergence in population trend between UK habitats since the 1980s. The breeding population in Scotland – in largely semi-natural open habitat – shows significant increase whereas there has been a significant decline in England. Here breeding numbers have remained stable or increased in semi-natural habitats, while woodland and farmland populations have plummeted. As a brood parasitic bird with a long-distance annual migration, the cuckoo has a unique network of relationships to songbird „hosts‟, prey and habitat; and a disconnection between adult and nestling ecology due to lack of parental care. This thesis investigated the role of breeding ground land-use factors in driving cuckoo population decline. In the first chapter information was synthesised from the literature on potential threats and environmental impacts facing cuckoo populations, which also highlighted knowledge gaps and a basis for hypotheses in later chapters.
    [Show full text]
  • Moths of Poole Harbour Species List
    Moths of Poole Harbour is a project of Birds of Poole Harbour Moths of Poole Harbour Species List Birds of Poole Harbour & Moths of Poole Harbour recording area The Moths of Poole Harbour Project The ‘Moths of Poole Harbour’ project (MoPH) was established in 2017 to gain knowledge of moth species occurring in Poole Harbour, Dorset, their distribution, abundance and to some extent, their habitat requirements. The study area uses the same boundaries as the Birds of Poole Harbour (BoPH) project. Abigail Gibbs and Chris Thain, previous Wardens on Brownsea Island for Dorset Wildlife Trust (DWT), were invited by BoPH to undertake a study of moths in the Poole Harbour recording area. This is an area of some 175 square kilometres stretching from Corfe Castle in the south to Canford Heath in the north of the conurbation and west as far as Wareham. 4 moth traps were purchased for the project; 3 Mercury Vapour (MV) Robinson traps with 50m extension cables and one Actinic, Ultra-violet (UV) portable Heath trap running from a rechargeable battery. This was the capability that was deployed on most of the ensuing 327 nights of trapping. Locations were selected using a number of criteria: Habitat, accessibility, existing knowledge (previously well-recorded sites were generally not included), potential for repeat visits, site security and potential for public engagement. Field work commenced from late July 2017 and continued until October. Generally, in the years 2018 – 2020 trapping field work began in March/ April and ran on until late October or early November, stopping at the first frost.
    [Show full text]
  • Sherwood Forest Lepidoptera Species List
    Sherwood Forest Lepidoptera Historical and modern species lists and records - First Edition 2009 T. and D. Pendleton Introduction to Sherwood Forest Lepidoptera First edition 2009 One aspect of recording which has not changed since the 1800’s, is the lack of attention given by Lepidopterists to the site’s micro lepidoptera. Virtually all This publication is aimed at providing an accurate record of all Sherwood Forest micro records sourced from Carr’s book were attributed to R.E. Brameld, who Lepidoptera recorded from the 1800‘s, the 1900’s, post-2000 records and must have spent many hours in the field recording. Without his work, then much completely up to date with the inclusion of the latest records from 2008 and larger gaps would have appeared in the records. As it is, much work is still follows the same format as we have used in the accompanying publication required to record the many leaf-mining species which Sherwood Forest Sherwood Forest Coleoptera - 2009 Edition. undoubtedly holds. It is by no means a complete list and should not be treated as so, but Recent Lepidoptera surveys and recording represents a hopeful start on the way to producing a definitive Sherwood Forest site list, by trying to gather all available Lepidoptera records in one document. A great deal of moth trapping and recording took place at the Visitor Centre during the 1980’s and has provided some very useful data, which at some time This is the first edition of this project and includes traceable public records in the future, will perhaps be used to enable a comparison with more recent and those held privately by local naturalists and our thanks go to those records and numbers.
    [Show full text]
  • MONITORING REPORT 2020 BILL BUDD It Is with Great Sadness That We Must Report the Death of Bull Budd in Autumn 2020
    Wimbledon and Putney Commons ECOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT 2020 BILL BUDD It is with great sadness that we must report the death of Bull Budd in autumn 2020. Bill was our much respected, dragonfly and damselfly recorder and a member of the Wildlife and Conservation Forum. As well as recording on the Commons, Bill also worked as a volunteer at the London Natural History Museum for many years and was the Surrey Vice County Dragonfly Recorder. Bill supported our BioBlitz activities and, with others from the Forum, led dedicated walks raising public awareness of the dragonfly and damselfly populations on the Commons. In September 2020 in recognition of his outstanding contributions to the recording and conservation of Odonata, a newly identified dragonfly species found in the Bornean rainforest* was named Megalogomphus buddi. His contributions will be very much missed. * For further information see: https://british-dragonflies.org.uk/dragonfly-named-after-bds-county-dragonfly-recorder-bill-budd/ Dow, R.A. and Price, B.W. (2020) A review of Megalogomphus sumatranus (Krüger, 1899) and its allies in Sundaland with a description of a new species from Borneo (Odonata: Anisoptera: Gomphidae). Zootaxa 4845 (4): 487–508. https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/article/view/zootaxa.4845.4.2 Accessed 24.02.2021 Thanks are due to everyone who has contributed records and photographs for this report; to the willing volunteers; for the support of Wildlife and Conservation Forum members; and for the reciprocal enthusiasm of Wimbledon and Putney Commons’ staff. A special thank you goes to Angela Evans-Hill for her help with proof reading, chasing missing data and assistance with the final formatting, compilation and printing of this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Additions, Deletions and Corrections to An
    Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) ADDITIONS, DELETIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF THE IRISH BUTTERFLIES AND MOTHS (LEPIDOPTERA) WITH A CONCISE CHECKLIST OF IRISH SPECIES AND ELACHISTA BIATOMELLA (STAINTON, 1848) NEW TO IRELAND K. G. M. Bond1 and J. P. O’Connor2 1Department of Zoology and Animal Ecology, School of BEES, University College Cork, Distillery Fields, North Mall, Cork, Ireland. e-mail: <[email protected]> 2Emeritus Entomologist, National Museum of Ireland, Kildare Street, Dublin 2, Ireland. Abstract Additions, deletions and corrections are made to the Irish checklist of butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera). Elachista biatomella (Stainton, 1848) is added to the Irish list. The total number of confirmed Irish species of Lepidoptera now stands at 1480. Key words: Lepidoptera, additions, deletions, corrections, Irish list, Elachista biatomella Introduction Bond, Nash and O’Connor (2006) provided a checklist of the Irish Lepidoptera. Since its publication, many new discoveries have been made and are reported here. In addition, several deletions have been made. A concise and updated checklist is provided. The following abbreviations are used in the text: BM(NH) – The Natural History Museum, London; NMINH – National Museum of Ireland, Natural History, Dublin. The total number of confirmed Irish species now stands at 1480, an addition of 68 since Bond et al. (2006). Taxonomic arrangement As a result of recent systematic research, it has been necessary to replace the arrangement familiar to British and Irish Lepidopterists by the Fauna Europaea [FE] system used by Karsholt 60 Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) and Razowski, which is widely used in continental Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Forsthaus Prösa“
    Heideprojekt im NSG „Forsthaus Prösa“ - Schmetterlingsmonitoring - Fotos: I. Rödel Rangsdorf, Januar 2011 Heideprojekt im NSG „Forsthaus Prösa“ - Schmetterlingsmonitoring - Auftraggeber : NaturSchutzFonds Brandenburg Lennéstraße 74 14471 Potsdam Bearbeitung : Natur & Text in Brandenburg GmbH Friedensallee 21 15834 Rangsdorf Tel. 033708 / 20431 [email protected] Dipl. Ing. Ingolf Rödel Rangsdorf, 28. Januar 2011 Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Anlass und Aufgabenstellung 1 2 Schmetterlinge als Bioindikatoren zur naturschutzfachlichen Beurteilung von Heidebiotopen 1 3 Kenntnisstand über die Schmetterlingsfauna märkischer Heidegebiete 2 4 Methodik 3 4.1 Spezifische Anforderungen 3 4.2 Erfassungsmethode 3 4.3 Termine 4 4.4 Probeflächen 7 5 Ergebnisse 8 5.1 Gesamtergebnis der Bestandsaufnahmen 8 5.2 Die nachgewiesenen Heideschmetterlinge 9 5.2.1 Dyscia fagaria (Heidekraut-Fleckenspanner) 9 5.2.2 Xestia agathina (Heidekraut Bodeneule) 10 5.2.3 Lycophotia molothina (Graue Heidekrauteule) 11 5.2.4 Dicallomera fascelina (Ginster-Streckfuß) 12 5.2.5 Plebeius argus (Argus-Bläuling) und Plebeius idas (Ginster-Bläuling) 13 5.2.6 Rhagades pruni (Heide-Grünwidderchen) 14 5.2.7 Rhyparia purpurata (Purpurbär) 15 5.2.8 Saturnia pavonia (Kleines Nachtpfauenauge) 15 5.2.9 Lycophotia porphyrea (Porphyr-Eule) 17 5.2.10 Xestia castanea (Ginsterheiden-Bodeneule) 17 5.2.11 Anarta myrtilli (Heidekrauteulchen) 18 5.2.12 Clorissa viridata (Steppenheiden-Grünspanner) 19 5.2.13 Eupithecia nanata (Heidekraut-Blütenspanner) 19 5.2.14 Pachycnemia hippocastanaria (Schmalflügeliger
    [Show full text]
  • Diverse Population Trajectories Among Coexisting Species of Subarctic Forest Moths
    Popul Ecol (2010) 52:295–305 DOI 10.1007/s10144-009-0183-z ORIGINAL ARTICLE Diverse population trajectories among coexisting species of subarctic forest moths Mikhail V. Kozlov • Mark D. Hunter • Seppo Koponen • Jari Kouki • Pekka Niemela¨ • Peter W. Price Received: 19 May 2008 / Accepted: 6 October 2009 / Published online: 12 December 2009 Ó The Society of Population Ecology and Springer 2009 Abstract Records of 232 moth species spanning 26 years times higher than those of species hibernating as larvae or (total catch of ca. 230,000 specimens), obtained by con- pupae. Time-series analysis demonstrated that periodicity tinuous light-trapping in Kevo, northernmost subarctic in fluctuations of annual catches is generally independent Finland, were used to examine the hypothesis that life- of life-history traits and taxonomic affinities of the species. history traits and taxonomic position contribute to both Moreover, closely related species with similar life-history relative abundance and temporal variability of Lepidoptera. traits often show different population dynamics, under- Species with detritophagous or moss-feeding larvae, spe- mining the phylogenetic constraints hypothesis. Species cies hibernating in the larval stage, and species pupating with the shortest (1 year) time lag in the action of negative during the first half of the growing season were over-rep- feedback processes on population growth exhibit the larg- resented among 42 species classified as abundant during est magnitude of fluctuations. Our analyses revealed that the entire sampling period. The coefficients of variation in only a few consistent patterns in the population dynamics annual catches of species hibernating as eggs averaged 1.7 of herbivorous moths can be deduced from life-history characteristics of the species.
    [Show full text]
  • Entomologiske Meddelelser
    Entomologiske Meddelelser BIND 59 KØBENHAVN 1991 Indhold - Contents Buh!, 0., P. Falck, B. Jørgensen, O. Karshol t, K. Larsen & K. Schnack: Fund af små• sommerfugle fra Danmark i 1989 (Lepidoptera) Records of Microlepidopterafrom Denmark in 1989 . 29 Fjellberg, A.: Proisotoma roberti n.sp. from Greenland, and redescription of P ripicola Linnaniemi, 1912 (Collembola, lsotomidae)................................ 81 Godske, L.: Aphids in nests of Lasius Jlavus F. in Denmark. 1: Faunistic description. (Aphidoidea, Anoeciidae & Pemphigidae; Hymenoptera, Formicidae) . 85 Hallas, T. E., M. Iversen, J Korsgaard & R. Dahl: Number of mi tes in stored grain, straw and hay related to the age ofthe substrate (Acari) . 57 Hansen, M. &J Pedersen: >>Hvad finder jeg i køkkenet«- en ny dansk skimmelbille, Adisternia watsoni (Wollaston) (Coleoptera, Latridiidae) A new Danish latridiid, Adisternia watsoni Wollaston. 23 Hansen, M., P. Jørum, V. Mahler & O. Vagtholm:Jensen: Niende tillæg til >>Forteg­ nelse over Danmarks biller« (Coleoptera) Ninth supplement to the list oj Danish Coleoptera . 5 Hansen, M. & S. Kristensen: To nye danske biller af slægten Monotoma Herbst (Cole­ optera, Monotomidae) Two new Danish beetles of the genus Monotoma Herbst . 41 Hansen, M., S. Kristensen, V. Mahler & J Pedersen: Tiende tillæg til >>Fortegnelse over Danmarks biller<< (Coleoptera) Tenth supplement to the list of Danish Coleoptera . 99 Heie, O. E.: Addition of fourteen species to the list of Danish aphids (Homoptera, Aphidoidea) . 51 Holmen, M.: Dværgvandnymfe, Nehalennia speciosa (Charpentier) ny for Danmark (Odonata, Coenagrionidae) The damselfly Nehalennia speciosa (Charpentier, 1840) new to Denmark ........... Nielsen, B. Overgaard: Seasonal development of the woodland earwig (Chelidurella acanthopygia Gene) in Denmark (Dermaptera) . 91 Pape, T.: Færøsk dermatobiose (Diptera, Oestridae, Cuterebrinae) - med en over- sigt over human myiasis i Danmark .
    [Show full text]
  • LCES News February 2003
    Lancashire and Cheshire Entomological Society Newsletter Incorporating The Cheshire Moth Group Newsletter February 2003 Number 1008 1 Welcome! Welcome to the latest LCES and CMG newsletter. Originally this issue was planned for Christmas but with pressures of work it had to be delayed – apologies! But there is good news. The 2001 lepidoptera report for VC58 is now complete. This is downloadable from the LCES, CMG and rECOrd web sites. Despite the wintry weather, there are signs of spring in the air. As I write this evening, the trap already contains 4 Pale Brindled Beauty and a Spring Usher and before too long the sallow blossom will be out together with the Quakers and Clouded Drabs. Hopefully this year will be better than the cold, wet, windy summers we seem to have had of late. Field Trips – 2003 Meetings Not much organised so far – if you fancy leading a field trip let me know and I’ll include details next issue. National Moth Night is the 12th April this year. The events we know about are: Events in Cheshire for the National Moth Night in 2003 are still to be arranged. Watch this space! Weather permitting we will try to trap at Pym Chair/Goyt Valley for Red Sword-grass. Please contact Adrian Wander BEFORE travelling. A National Moth Night moth trapping event at Weaver Valley Parkway. Meet at the car park off the A5018 opposite Morrison's Supermarket (SJ656669). Drop in at any time. For further details contact: Brian Jaques on: 01606 891242 Field Trip Reports 29th September: Crimes Lane, Beeston This was an excellent outing and a very informative field trip looking at leaf mines.
    [Show full text]