Raising Our Game

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Raising Our Game Raising our game the rationale to embrace skepticamp by Reed Esau, October 2008 Prologue In his 2007 essay “Where do we go from here?”1 Daniel Loxton asked skeptics to return to our roots and hinted at a role for the ama- teur skeptic in his closing remarks: “Thereʼs burden enough to go around. Even our heroes need stu- dents, helpers—even, one day, heirs. Newbie enthusiasm is no kind of substitute for knowledge, experience and expertise, but itʼs something of value in its own right. If skepticism is a Sisyphean task, then we will always need more people who are enthusiastic about rolling rocks.” Loxton hits the mark in recognizing that enthusiasm stands to play an essential role in the future of organized skepticism. We are entering an exciting new era where emerging social tech- nologies and new methods of outreach hint at an abundance of newbie enthusiasm the likes of which we have never seen. How- ever, we risk squandering this windfall if we cannot provide good opportunities to engage and build upon that enthusiasm. One approach to meet this challenge focuses on distributing knowledge within our community, particularly at the local level at informal events organized by ourselves where everyone can par- ticipate. We call it ʻskepticampʼ though strangely it requires no camping. The decline of the formal group Until recently, starting a local skeptic group was both difficult and risky. Typically organizers would form a non-profit corporation, elect officers, enlist volunteers, publish a newsletter, and set about acquiring dues-paying members. The model worked well so long as the leadership remained sufficiently effective and energetic in its activ- ism to retain and attract new members. That organizers accomplished so much with this model is to be admired. However, in all 1 Loxtonʼs essay can be found at http://www.skeptic.com/downloads/WhereDoWeGoFromHere.pdf Page 1 of 17 but a handful of cases it didnʼt prove to be sustainable. Organizer burnout, an aging membership and other problems led to a general decline in influence and participation.2 The cost of failure was high, leaving some areas with little or no organized skeptic pres- ence for years. And then something changed The cost of group creation plummeted. Recent adoption of social technologies like Meetup and Facebook have enabled new groups to form quickly at little or no cost. These new services ease the task of manag- ing the group by providing tools for organizers to interact with members, such as hosting RSVP lists for events. In addition, new members tend to join up with little or no promotional effort, driven to the group by search engines and the recommendations of social net- works. These new groups share few charac- teristics with their predecessors. They generally fail more often and more quickly, but the cost of failure is comparatively negligible. New groups with different organizers and priorities can rise from their ashes.3 This proves to be an accelerator, allowing Rocky Mountain Paranormal presenting at the inaugural for experimentation with new models skepticamp in Denver, Colorado in August 2007 (photo by at a rapid pace measured in months Rich Orman) rather than years or decades. These groups can be general in scope or highly specific. They can be geared towards longevity or towards a single event. They can limit who participates or keep it open to all. Their only reason for existence is to meet a need that can attract members. The first successful model to emerge is the ʻsocial skeptics group.ʼ On Meetup alone 2 Local groups (esp. campus groups) supported by the Center For Inquiry (CFI) have seen success in recent years. Though skepticism is advanced through CFIʼs affiliate organization, the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry (CSI) and its magazine The Skeptical Inquirer, skepticism is only one component of CFIʼs much broader mission that also includes secular humanism, the critical examination of religion and the secularization of Islamic society. 3 In the Denver/Boulder area, two skeptic groups on Meetup came and went before the present one took hold. Page 2 of 17 there is now an active presence of such groups in 40 cities in North America.4 With its modest goal of building community the social group canʼt readily be compared to the traditional skeptic group with its focus on activism. However, the ease at which a meet-up can be formed offers greater geographical reach and can eventually serve as a step towards bigger things later on. Like their forebears these new social groups have their own unique challenges. The disillusioned newbie Itʼs not pretty. Though we draw in enthusiastic new members with the help of these so- cial technologies, those new members arenʼt sticking around. Meetup bleeds members For the meet-ups, roughly half (40-60%) of those who join will become inactive within a few months. In one sense this isnʼt surprising. Most non-skeptic groups at Meetup suffer a rate of attrition that is similar or even worse. We may fault the fickle nature of the Meetup user base. But we can just as well fault ourselves in failing to under- stand and master this new medium. We may appreciate losing the dead weight of ʻpoor-qualityʼ members. But for Attendees of Colorado Skepticamp 2008 in Castle every 9/11 conspiracy theorist who drops Rock (photo by Rich Orman) out, we lose others who could have be- come great contributors. In any case we are failing to capture the imagination of those who make the effort to join. Worse yet, the constant infusion of new members tends to mask the attrition, mak- ing the problem seem less severe.5 The exact cause of such attrition isnʼt always clear, though it appears that the expecta- tions of newcomers arenʼt being met. Performing exit interviews can help us understand 4 See appendix for some detailed numbers about skeptics on Meetup. A similar network of groups, but even less structured is Drinking Skeptically (http://drinkingskeptically.org) which is geared towards a pre- dictable schedule for their meetings. Another network, Skeptics In The Pub (http://www.skeptic.org.uk/pub), has a focus on speakers for events. 5 Therein lies a great opportunity: a mother lode of growth is at hand for those groups that learn how to staunch the bleeding. Page 3 of 17 what factors may be at work. We can also look to see how other groups diagnose and treat such problems. How churches maintain their numbers Simple arithmetic demands that any group whose attrition outpaces its recruitment will eventually cease to exist. You must replenish your losses to merely survive. Weʼve seen this in some of our traditional skeptic groups. When the influx of new members fell off, the group aged and numbers dwindled. Churches also face this problem, particularly in rural areas when the young migrate to the cities. The threat is taken seriously by nearly every congregation where church organizers employ time-tested practices as well as recent innovations to keep the pews filled every Sunday morning. While a handful of the practices employed are specific to religious organizations, most are secular in nature and broadly applicable, such as one practice that will be the focus of this essay: Crystal Yates-White presenting on To provide a path for the individual to grow through the Fund for Thought at a March meaningful opportunities for involvement. 2008 event in Colorado (photo by Rich Orman) Stated so simply, it may seem a cliché or a platitude. But within that carefully-worded sentence lies a chal- lenge: those who can figure out ways to offer such opportunities in large numbers stand to change what it means to be a skeptic. Before we can understand those future opportunities for involvement, we must first look to see how we presently contribute and the problems therein. Page 4 of 17 How skeptics contribute There is no such thing as an ʻaverageʼ skeptic. We are all over the map in how we pitch in. The level of contribution among skeptics varies considerably with the likes of Michael Shermer at the top end of the scale and the freshly-minted newbie at the bottom. To dig into the details of this imbalance reveals an intriguing opportunity. The skeptical blogger If you blog on skeptic-related topics, chances are the volume of your stronger material falls far short of that of the most prolific of skeptic bloggers such as Phil Plait of Bad As- tronomy6 fame. Phil is a professional writer, a scientist and a well-connected skeptic who has the talent, time and inclination to sift through volumes of email and information each day to publish at a brisk pace. Remove any of those support- ing pillars, such as time or inclination, and Philʼs output drops sharply. A similar pattern holds as we scale up to in- clude the entire community of skeptics. How we contribute According to social researchers, for any given population of interacting individuals the level of contribution varies considerably with a small group within the population contribut- ing a disproportionate amount of the effort.7 It should be no surprise that in our own community there are a few dozen individuals, many of them full-time skeptics, producing much of the value through writing, podcast- ing, activism, investigations and speaking. But what about the rest of us—more than 95% of skeptics—who are producing the re- 6 Though Philʼs blog is now hosted at Discover Magazineʼs site, you can still reach it through http://badastronomy.com. Cropped photo via http://flickr.com/photos/badastronomy/2781702559/ 7 The Italian economist Vilfredo Pareto first observed this pattern while studying income distributions in the early 1900s.
Recommended publications
  • Communicating Skepticism Science Based Healthcare Conspiracy Theories a New Chair-Entity Skeptical Desiderata the Kardashian Index Good Germs and Bad Germs
    Communicating skepticism Science Based Healthcare Conspiracy theories A new Chair-entity Skeptical Desiderata The Kardashian Index Good germs and bad germs number 113 – spring 2014 content editorial Communicating skepticism or: How I learned to stop worrying and love the Media 3 Thanks for all the fish Society for Science Based Healthcare – up and running 8 T’S about 25 years since I joined the NZ Skeptics, and eight years since I took on the editorship of this magazine. It’s been fun, Book Review: The Orphan I Conspiracies 10 but it’s time I handed the NZ Skeptic on to other hands, so this will be my last issue as editor. Thank-you to all who have contributed Newsfront 12 over the years; together we’ve covered a lot of ground. I thought Skeptical Desiderata 15 I’d indulge myself a little here by looking back over past issues and some of the material in them. Interview with the entity 16 Yet another science metric Some topics never go away. Alternative medicine remains as – the Kardashian Index 18 popular as ever, and mediums are still fleecing the vulnerable and the grieving. Others, such as crop circles, may emerge, prosper for a Forum 20 time and then fade. A few may morph in unexpected and occasion- From the vaults: Group wants ally alarming directions. Hypnotic regression started out as a means cash to fight ritual abuse 21 of ‘discovering’ a person’s past lives or alien abduction experiences Survival in a bacterial (see p 5) but became more sinister when subjects began to report world 22 instances of satanic ritual abuse and, later (coupled with flawed inter- rogations of children), more conventional forms of sexual abuse (see NZ Skeptic 50, this issue p 21).
    [Show full text]
  • 2013-03-March-Sacram
    Special Events Volume 1, Issue 3 March 2013 Fri Mar 1 Movie n Pizza at Sierra College Darwin Day Gala a Success! Fri Mar 1 SAAF meeting and discussion We honored science and the greatest scientific dis- Sat Mar 2 Little Free Library planning covery, natural selection. Lots of tables, including Sun Mar 3 Ancient Chris- ACLU, local groups, Camp Quest, sale of Darwin tian Study Group finger puppets, four electric cars were displayed, the Wed Mar 6 New Member Coffee Meetup Mockingbirds sang sciencey songs in great harmony, Sat Mar 9 SF National and everyone had plenty of cake! Atheist Party Conf. Sat Mar 9 Stockton Dr. Ivan Schwab made interesting points about the eye: Brunch and Atheism Sun Mar 10 Dinosaur Day 1. We needed a ‘file cabinet’ to handle so much sensory Science Fest input, so the brain developed after the eye, not before. Sun Mar 10 Modesto 2. Eyes started when creatures were still ocean dwell- Science on Screen Sun Mar 10 “Hope After ers. That's why our eyes Faith” - Jerry Dewitt need constant lid flap- Fri Mar 15 Stockton ping to keep them wet. Drinking Skeptically Sat Mar 16 Ask an 3. Eyes started as a pro- Atheist - St. Pat’s Parade tein source, using sun- Sat Mar 16 Potluck Game light for energy. Later came a reaction for move- Night Sun Mar 17 JoAnn Anglin ment away from sudden shadows. Poetry Topics 4. Many types of eyes still exist, many much better Sun Mar 17 Blasphemy Breakfast - Rocklin than ours. Some see infrared, like snakes.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophical Communities Jules Evans and Thomas Dixon Background
    Connected Communities Philosophical Communities Jules Evans and Thomas Dixon Background Executive Summary Researchers and Project Partners Grassroots philosophy groups have Project leads proliferated in the UK, the US and beyond Jules Evans over the last 15 years. This is in part thanks Policy Director, Centre for the History to social networking websites like meetup. of the Emotions, Queen Mary, University com and Facebook, which have made it of London. easier for organisers to publicise their groups: there are now 846 philosophy Thomas Dixon groups on meetup.com alone, some of Director, Centre for the History of them with thousands of members. Today, the Emotions, Queen Mary, University philosophy groups meet in pubs, cafes, of London. bookstores, parks, old people’s homes, Project partners prisons, in virtual worlds and elsewhere. Such groups challenge formal models Jonathan Rowson of education and traditional divisions Director of the Social Brain Centre, RSA between high and mass culture, and Charles Seaford affirm the public’s appetite for informal Head of the Centre for Well-Being, new philosophical discussion. economics foundation This project examines and promotes the Paul Doran contemporary rise of grassroots philosophy National Director, Philosophy in Pubs groups. The project’s outputs consist of a David R. Buchanan 30,000-word research report, a seminar, Director, Institute for Global Health and a website (www.thephilosophyhub.com), and has generated over 20 media articles Seminar participants and interviews so far. The report seeks to Steve Bramall map the landscape of grassroots philosophy SBA groups, and to bring together existing research findings and resources regarding Lizzy Lewis those groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Skepticism 2.0
    Skepticism 2.0 D.J. GROTHE hen Carl Sagan, James Randi, Paul Kurtz, Martin from CSICOP’s own magazine subscriber lists. Groups were Gardner, Ray Hyman, and others came together formed in the Washington, DC, and Los Angeles regions and W in the mid-1970s to form the Committee for the in a number of other cities around the U.S. and abroad. A Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Para normal (CSICOP, movement, not merely a magazine, was beginning to form. now CSI), did they plan on starting a worldwide grassroots In recent years, new developments in technology and soci- critical-thinking movement? Did they craft a plan to deputize ety have allowed this skeptical movement to reach out in new everyday people to speak out in their communities about the directions, sometimes departing from tested ways of advancing prevailing nonsensical ideas of the day? Did they envision the skeptical outlook that have worked in the past. This is the young people meeting up regularly to be skeptical together, as next generation of skepticism. This is Skepticism 2.0. in the growing Skeptics in the Pub events in cities across North America and around the world? New Media for New Audiences Often citing inspiration from the founders of CSI, an “aver- age Joe” skeptical citizen, possibly without special training or background in skepticism and with the help of only a computer connected to the Internet, can reach out to an audience that the skeptical magazines and organizations never would have reached I doubt it. These men had the laudable ambition to orga- nize leading think ers and social critics to respond authorita- tively to growing trends of credulity in society: increased belief in the power of psychics, the phenomenon of Uri Geller, UFO beliefs, ancient astronaut theories, popular belief in ghost hauntings and channeling, faith healers and religious charla- tans, and the like.
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE Colm Mulcahy
    CURRICULUM VITAE (2-page version available upon request) Colm Mulcahy Address Department of Mathematics Spelman College, PO Box 953 Atlanta, Georgia 30314, U.S.A. Email : [email protected] URL : www.cardcolm.org Twitter : @cardcolm Born September 1958, Dublin, Ireland Citizenship Irish (Permanent resident status in U.S.A.) Education Ph.D. in Mathematics, Cornell University, 1985 M.A. in Mathematics, Cornell University, 1982 M.Sc. in Mathematics, University College Dublin, 1979 B.Sc. in Mathematical Sciences, University College Dublin, 1978 Employment Spelman College, 1988 − , Professor of Mathematics (Chair, 2003 − 2006) Awards & Recognitions 1. Presidential Award in Scholarly Achievement, Spelman College, May 2013. 2. First ever Faculty Innovation and Initiative Award (from Spelman College’s Faculty Council), May 2011. 3. Fannie Lou Hamer Award (Spelman College Board of Trustees) for community service, April 2001. 4. Carl B. Allendoerfer Award (Mathematical Association of America prize for excellence in exposi- tion), for “Plotting and Scheming with Wavelets,” Mathematics Magazine, August 1997. Courses taught Mathematics for Liberal Arts, Honors Quantitative Reasoning, Precalculus sequence, Applied and regular Calculus sequences, Multivariable Calculus, General Statistics, Introduction to Mathematics Seminar, Foundations of Mathematics, Linear Algebra I & II, Discrete Mathematics, Mathematical Magic with Cards, Number Theory, Geometry, Numerical Analysis, Probability & Statistics I & II, Abstract Algebra I & II, Real Variables I & II, Senior Seminar Book 1. Mathematical Card Magic: Fifty-Two New Effects, AK Peters/CRC (380 pages, August 2013) Book Chapters 1. (with Neil Calkin, to appear) “Gallia est omnis divisa in partes quattuor (Mathematics Inspired by Dealing Cards into a Pile),” in The Earnest Contemplation of Trivial Pursuits: Progress in Recreational Mathematics, edited by Jennifer Beinecke & Jason Rosenhouse, Princeton University Press, August 2015 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Freethought Volume 1 No
    The Tampa Bay Coalition of Reason Freethought Volume 1 No. 5 Oct. 2012 Jim Peterson, Editor ews N What’s Inside? It Is Time for Secular Humanists to Run for Faith Unified Calendar… ... ... 2 is a Humanist Value Humanist Society…... 3 * Public Office Faith? ...in Humanism? Yes, actually. Not in Tampa Humanists…. 7 * By Paul Kurtz, Ruth Mitchell, Toni Van Pelt, and deities or superstitions of course, but in ourselves as human beings; and in each other. Faith in human Clr.UU-Humanists… 7 * Tom Flynn potential, confidence in the instruments of reason Post Carbon Council..8 As secular humanists, we live in this world here and and logic; in the value of the world we have created; Freethought Films…..9 now, not in an imaginary world beyond our lives. these are the basis of real hope. This is faith carved This is our place, and it can only be better if we take in the immutable granite of human history. We Humanist Families…. 10 * responsibility for it. The Council for Secular embrace both Mozart and Stalin, the ugliness and Americans United..… 10 Humanism and the Center for Inquiry are committed horror, the beauty and delight. For they are both an to a set of humanist ethical values, many of which expression of the human, and define for better or Military Atheists.….10 * can be fulfilled only by social and political action worse, our possibilities. Though we are not shaped Atheists of FL ……..11 * for which we need to take responsibility. as passive stone, our character is chiseled in the Ctr.
    [Show full text]
  • +Dragons, Brains &Energy
    SKEPTICISM . SCIENCE . SOCIETY Vol. 36, No 3. September 2016 Risks & Stats What Skeptics need to know +Dragons, Brains & Energy Australian Skeptics . www.skeptics.com.au Skeptic_Cover_SEP16.indd 1 30/08/2016 1:22 pm The Skeptic September 16 Skeptical Groups in Australia NSW VIC Australian Skeptics Inc – Eran Segev Australian Skeptics (Vic) Inc – Chris Guest www.skeptics.com.au GPO Box 5166, Melbourne VIC 3001 PO Box 20, Beecroft, NSW 2119 Tel: 1 800 666 996 [email protected] Tel: 02 8094 1894; Mob: 0432 713 195; Fax: (02) 8088 4735 Skeptics’ Café – Third Monday of every month, with guest [email protected] speaker. La Notte, 140 Lygon St. Meal from 6pm, speaker at 8pm Sydney Skeptics in the Pub – 6pm first Thursday of each sharp. More details on our web site www.skeptics.com.au/vic month at the Crown Hotel, cnr Goulburn and Elizabeth Streets in the city (meeting upstairs) Dinner meetings are held on a regular basis. Ballarat Skeptics Currently being re-activated. See Facebook for details Hunter Skeptics – John Turner Tel: (02) 4959 6286 [email protected] Citizens for Science - Mornington Peninsula (formerly Peninsula Skeptics, aka The Celestial Teapot) Meetings are held at the Club Macquarie, Lake Road, Argenton Contact: Graeme Hanigan 0438 359 600 on the second Thursday of each month, excepting January, http://www.meetup.com/Citizens-for-Science/ commencing 7.00pm, with a guest speaker or open discussion www.facebook.com/groups/peninsula.skeptics/ on a given topic. Visitors welcome. Further information from the secretary
    [Show full text]
  • Social Innovation Camps and Labs: Lessons from Internews' Experience
    INTERNEWS CENTER FOR INNOVATION & LEARNING innovation.internews.org SOCIAL INNOVATION CAMPS AND LABS: LESSONS FROM INTERNEWS’ EXPERIENCE Tara Susman-Peña January 2014 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author wishes to thank Amanda Noonan, Director of Research & Learning, Josh Machleder, Vice President for Europe & Eurasia, and Sam DeSilva, Innovation Advisor for Asia (all of Internews), for their feedback on drafts of this report. Maria Cruz, Center for Innovation& Learning Intern, provided a very helpful review of the available literature on Social Innovation Camps, Labs, and similar events. Many thanks go especially to the interviewees for their time, input, and patience. ABOUT THE AUTHOR Tara Susman-Peña is Senior Research Officer at Internews, focusing on both the evaluation of innovation pilots and broader research on innovation and policy. She is the director of Internews’ Media Map Project, examining the evidence for the impact of media on development; making global media data more open and interactive; and using both traditional and innovative research meth- ods to understand how donors have impacted the development of the media in six countries over two decades (www.MediaMapResource.org). Before joining Internews, she worked in the audience insight and research department at NPR, where she managed the online listener panel and qualita- tive research initiatives. Prior to NPR, her years of commercial market research experience focused on branding, video ethnography, product and service development, and communication strategy in the media, technology, health, food, fashion, and automotive industries. CREDITS The report was edited by Mary Myers Design: Kirsten Ankers, Citrine Sky Design Photos: Courtesy of Internews CONTENTS Chapter 1 An Introduction to Social Innovation Camps and Labs ..................
    [Show full text]
  • Independent Together: Building and Maintaining Values in a Distributed Web Infrastructure
    Independent Together: Building and Maintaining Values in a Distributed Web Infrastructure by Jack Jamieson A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Information University of Toronto © Copyright 2021 by Jack Jamieson Abstract Independent Together: Building and Maintaining Values in a Distributed Web Infrastructure Jack Jamieson Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Information University of Toronto 2021 This dissertation studies a community of web developers building the IndieWeb, a modular and decen- tralized social web infrastructure through which people can produce and share content and participate in online communities without being dependent on corporate platforms. The purpose of this disser- tation is to investigate how developers' values shape and are shaped by this infrastructure, including how concentrations of power and influence affect individuals' capacity to participate in design-decisions related to values. Individuals' design activities are situated in a sociotechnical system to address influ- ence among individual software artifacts, peers in the community, mechanisms for interoperability, and broader internet infrastructures. Multiple methods are combined to address design activities across individual, community, and in- frastructural scales. I observed discussions and development activities in IndieWeb's online chat and at in-person events, studied source-code and developer decision-making on GitHub, and conducted 15 in-depth interviews with IndieWeb contributors between April 2018 and June 2019. I engaged in crit- ical making to reflect on and document the process of building software for this infrastructure. And I employed computational analyses including social network analysis and topic modelling to study the structure of developers' online activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Flat, Hollow &Doomed +Skeptics &Religion, Psychic Detective, MTHFR
    SKEPTICISM . SCIENCE . SOCIETY Vol 38, No 1. March 2018 The Earth Flat, Hollow & Doomed +Skeptics & Religion, Psychic Detective, MTHFR Australian Skeptics . www.skeptics.com.au Skeptic_Cover_Mar18.indd 1 8/03/2018 11:14 pm The Skeptic March 18 Skeptical Groups in Australia NSW VIC Australian Skeptics Inc – Eran Segev Australian Skeptics (Vic) Inc – Chris Guest www.skeptics.com.au GPO Box 5166, Melbourne VIC 3001 PO Box 20, Beecroft, NSW 2119 Tel: 1 800 666 996 [email protected] Tel: 02 8094 1894; Mob: 0432 713 195; Fax: (02) 8088 4735 [email protected] Skeptics’ Café – Third Monday of every month, with guest speaker. Clyde Hotel, cnr Elgin and Cardigan Sts, Carlton. Meal Sydney Skeptics in the Pub – 6pm first Thursday of each from 6pm, speaker at 8pm sharp.($4 contribution). More details month at the Occidental Hotel, York Street in the city, near on our web site www.skeptics.com.au/vic Wynyard Park (meeting second floor) Dinner meetings are held on a regular basis. Ballarat Skeptics in the Pub http://facebook.com/groups/3978112230309544 Hunter Skeptics – John Turner Tel: (02) 4959 6286 [email protected] Geelong Skeptics Society Occasional social meetings at the Cricketers Arms Hotel, Cooks Contact: James Rolton [email protected] Hill. Those on the contact list will be sent details in advance. Online group: See Facebook for details. Currently meeting at 12.30 on third Sunday of each odd-numbered Hosting the Annual Surf Coast Summer Skepticamp (February) month. Gippsland Skeptics in the Pub Blue Mountains Skeptics Interested parties contact Mark Guerin or Martin Christian Power See Facebook for details.
    [Show full text]
  • The Digital Scholar
    The Digital Scholar How Technology Is Transforming Scholarly Practice Martin Weller BLOOMSBURY ACADEMIC First published in 2011 by Bloomsbury Academic an imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc 36 Soho Square, LondonWiD3QY, UK and 175 Fifth Avenue, NewYork, NY 10010, USA Copyright © Martin Weller 2011 This work is published subject to a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher. For permission to publish commercial versions please contact Bloomsbury Academic CIP records for this book are available from the British Library and the Library of Congress ISBN 978-1-84966-497-4 (hardback) ISBN 978-1-84966-617-6 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-84966-625-1 (ebook) Visit http://bloomsburyacademic.com/ to find out more about our authors and their books. You will find extracts, author interviews, author events and you can sign up for newsletters to be the first to hear about our latest releases and special offers. Coverimage: © PeterPhoto123/Shutterstock To Ellen While industries such as music, newspapers, film and publishing have seen radical changes in their business models and practices as a direct result of new technologies, higher education has so far resisted the wholesale changes we have seen elsewhere. However, a gradual and fundamental shift in the practice of academics is taking place. Every aspect of scholarly practice is seeing changes effected by the adoption and possibilities of new technologies. This book will explore these changes, their implications for higher education, the possibilities for new forms of scholarly practice and what lessons can be drawn from other sectors.
    [Show full text]
  • Ten Simple Rules for Organizing an Unconference
    EDITORIAL Ten Simple Rules for Organizing an Unconference Aidan Budd1*, Holger Dinkel1, Manuel Corpas2, Jonathan C. Fuller3, Laura Rubinat1,4, Damien P. Devos5, Pierre H. Khoueiry6*, Konrad U. Förstner7, Fotis Georgatos8, Francis Rowland9, Malvika Sharan10, Janos X. Binder1,11, Tom Grace12, Karyn Traphagen13, Adam Gristwood14, Natasha T. Wood15 1 Structural and Computational Biology (SCB) Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Heidelberg, Germany, 2 The Genome Analysis Centre (TGAC), Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom, 3 Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies (HITS) gGmbH, Heidelberg, Germany, 4 Molecular Microbial Ecology Group, Institute of Aquatic Ecology, Universitat de Girona, Girona, Spain, 5 Centro Andaluz de Biología del Desarrollo (CABD), Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Sevilla, Spain, 6 Genome Biology (GB) Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Heidelberg, Germany, 7 Core Unit Systems Medicine, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany, 8 Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine (LCSB), University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg, 9 European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom, 10 Institute for Molecular Infection Biology, Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany, 11 Bioinformatics Core Facility, Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine (LCSB), University of Luxembourg, Walferdange, Luxembourg, 12 Typeface & Lettering Design, Heidelberg, Germany, 13 ScienceOnline, Durham, North Carolina,
    [Show full text]