DOCSLIB.ORG

Peak Discharge of Crane Creek at the US 395 Culvert for a 100-Year Precipitation Event

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Peak Discharge of Crane Creek at the US 395 Culvert for a 100-Year Precipitation Event Giammona 1 Peak discharge of Crane Creek at the US 395 Culvert for a 100-year Precipitation Event. CE 413 School of Civil and Construction Engineering Oregon State University 3/12/2021 Submitted by Ryan Giammona Full report can be accessed at: https://sites.google.com/oregonstate.edu/ryan-giammona/home Giammona 2 Introduction: Oregon department of transportation requests that the water flow path through an existing culvert at the intersection of Crane Creek and US 395 be redesigned to prevent highway overtopping and to reduce the amount of sediment that clogs the existing flow path. The source of water flow through the site is Crane Creek, which collects water from the surrounding Crane Mountain watershed, and is a tributary to Goose Lake. The culvert redesign must address the given issues to help prevent the flooding of nearby private properties and the overtopping of the ODOT-owned highway 395. Possible considerations for this project include culvert size, layout and placement, sediment management, fish passage, temporary water and traffic control, construction staging, roadside safety, and roadway geometric design. Foreseeable challenges facing this project are that the site is located within a FEMA flood plain, sediment management, a shallow elevation of the existing highway with respect to the stream bed, and design restrictions due to budgetary restraints. The primary objective of this project is to protect Highway 395 from flooding by designing a new culvert crossing, accounting for sediment passage, and allowing for fish passage, all while limiting the flooding to nearby private property barnyard. The proposed design entails the retirement of the existing culvert, and addition of a culvert approximately 300ft north of the existing site running under US395. The approach to this design must be cost-effective, and consider environmental/safety challenges. The first stage of the project will require the determination of peak discharge for a 100-year discharge event per ODOT hydraulics manual. This report will detail the determination of the 100-year peak discharge based on the NRCS graphical method with information derived from publicly available raster data interpreted using ArcGIS pro. Giammona 3 Site Description: The location of this site is on a stretch of US 395 (Fremont Highway), about 5 miles south of Lakeview, Oregon, as shown in the site map below in figure 1. The crane mountain wateshed draining into the existising culvert is approximantly 8364 acres, located east of the existing culvert location. The forested portion of the watershed lies on the western slopes of Crane Mountain and the upper lopes of the Camas Creek drainage in the Warner Range. The eastern slopes of Crane Mountain are influenced by the rain shadow effects of the mountain's elevation; 8,456 feet at its highest point. The mountain is comprised a series of north to south running ridges separating Goose Lake Valley from the eastern Oregon high desert.The upper eastern slope of Crane Mountain above 8,000 feet is generally above tree line and subject to harsh winter conditions. Slopes just below 8,000 feet are generally subalpine consisting of open meadows and white barked pine. See Figure 2 below for view of watershed. Giammona 4 Giammona 5 Data: USGS NED n43w121 1/3 arc-second elevation model was downloaded for the USGS The National Map Downloader as a raster with 1/3 arc second resolution in with the NAD 1983 Geographic coordinate system The US soils hydraulic properties raster was downloaded from the ERSI live atlas. The projected coordinate system is WGS 1984 Web Mercator and has a 30M resolution. The US Vegetation land cover properties raster was downloaded from the ERSI live atlas. The projected coordinate system is North America Albers Equal Area Conic and has a 30M resolution The Nation Hydrology Dataset stream data was downloaded for the USGS The National Map Downloader as vector information with the NAD 1983 Geographic coordinate system. Giammona 6 Methodology: ArcGIS pro was used to determine watershed area, and to determine hydraulic properties of the area. The first stage was to determine the watershed area. Once the DEM model was downloaded the first step was to run the run the fill tool on the DEM to smooth any sinks or irregulates that may have occurred within the DEM The next stage was to run the flow direction tool on the fill DEM to the direction of flow from each cell to its steepest downslope neighbor. Then the next stage was to run the Flow Accumulation tool, this calculates the accumulated flow to each cell, as determined by the accumulated weight of all cells that flow into each downslope cell. Then new layer with a single pour point at the culvert was created and placed directly on the cell where the flow accumulation was traced for crane creek. Then the watershed tool was used to determine all watershed stream of the pour point location. This raster was transformed into a polygon and determined to have an area of 8364 acres. The DEM raster was clipped to the size of the watershed polygon for future use, The following information was needed for the NRCS graphical method peak flow equation. Average slope: The average slope was determined by using the slope function on the clipped DEM to determine slope, the statics of this raster showed a mean slope of 27 degrees. Y= 27.1 Degrees Average Soil type: The US hydraulic soils map clipped to the watershed size showed 5 soil types within the watershed. The count is the number of cells to provide an estimate of average soil type to be used to find the curve number. Giammona 7 Vegetation Cover: The US vegetation land cover map clipped to the watershed siz and showed 2 vegetation types within the watershed. The count is the number of cells to provide an estimate of average vegetation type to be used to find the curve number. The Resulting data can be used to determine the watersheds curve number based on the NRCS graphical method: (79 ∗ (69%) + 73 ∗ (30%)) + (32(69%) + 35(30%)) 퐶푁 = = 54.5 2 Giammona 8 Precipitation: Precipitation data for this areas was acquired through the ODOT REGIONAL PRECIPITATION-FREQUENCY ANALYSIS as seen in figure 3. Figure 3. Oregon 24-hour, 100 year Precipitation map(ODOT REGIONAL PRECIPITATION FREQUENCY ANALYSIS) The value was determined to be P= 3.25 inches Based on the NRCS map 2-1, crane creek classifies as Type: II rainfall Giammona 9 Figure 4. NRCS Rainfall type Area: The area was calculated to be approximately 8364 acres in the watershed polygon. Am=8364 acres= 13.1 square miles Watershed Length: watershed length was calculated using the measure tool to determine the distance from the furthest extend to the culvert. L= 295276 feet The resulting information was used to determine the time of concentration 0.7 1000 (2952760.8 ∗ ( − 9)) 54.5 푇푐 = = 0.932 1140(27.06)0.5 Giammona 10 Using Table 4-1 from NCRS Ia is calculated based on curve number 퐼푎 = 1.636 퐼푎 1.636 = = 0.501 푃 3.25 푛푐ℎ푒푠 Giammona 11 Ia/P and Tc values are then used in the NRCS Peak Unit discharge graph to determine qu . 퐶퐹푀 푞푢 = 160 푛푐ℎ Giammona 12 Precipitation value and the Curve number are then used the runoff equation grao to determine direct runoff values. 푄 = 0.2 푛푐ℎ푒푠 Giammona 13 Peak Discharge qp can then be determined using the following information. qu= 160 CFM/inches Am=13.1 square miles Q= 0.2 Inches Pond/swamp factor Fp = 1.0 (since there are no swamps or ponds located within the watershed) 퐶퐹푀 푞 = (160 ) (13.1 푚2)(0.2 푛푐ℎ푒푠) = 419 퐶퐹푆 푝 퐼푛푐ℎ푒푠 The peak discharge of Crane creek at the US 395 culvert is approximately 419 Cubic Feet per second per the NRCS Graphical Peak Discharge Method. Giammona 14 Flowchart: Giammona 15 Results: The results of this report demonstrated a estimated peak discharge during a 100 year precipitation event to be 419 cubic feet per second according to the NRCS graphical method. USGS stream gauge # 11341200 approximately is 2.25 miles upstream (figure 4) has determined the 100-year flood flow to be 346 CFS. This verifies the estimation of 419 cubic feet per second is reasonable and slightly than the USGS gauge report due to the fact that there is roughly 1.3 square miles of catchment area between the USGS stream gauge and the US 395 culvert. Figure 4. Illustrating location of USGS stream Gauge #11341200 This Report does not account for potential effects of snow on steam flow and assumes all precipitation fall in the form of rain. With much of the area receiving snowfall during the winter months, snow accumulation likely has a large effect on steam flows weather it be freeze/thaw cycles or large thaw events for areas above the tree line which likely cause heavy flows into crane creek A further study may analyze the effects of snow accumulation and rapid snow melt and take those effects into consideration. The culvert also lies within the FEMA 100-year flood zone and may be affected by stream bank overtopping during large storm event as shown in the small dark green section fig 5. These events may cause overtopping of the stream banks and effect stream properties but should not affect the flow of Crane creek. Figure 5. FEMA 100-year flood zone Giammona 16 Appendix: “Module 206 A - Time of Concentration .” National Resource Conservation Service, USDA, <https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/nedc/training/resources/?cid=st elprdb1083083> (Mar. 12, 2021). “Module 206 B Peak Discharge (Graphical Method, TR-55) .” National Resource Conservation Service USDA, <https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/nedc/training/resources/?cid=st elprdb1083083> (Mar.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 Senate Committee on Natural Resources and Wildfire Recovery
    Senate Committee On Natural Resources and Wildfire Recovery Oregon State Capitol 900 Court Street NE Salem, Oregon 97301 February 3, 2021 Chair Golden, Vice Chair Heard and distinguished Committee Members, thank you for the opportunity to appear before you today. I’m going to share about the importance of engaging tribal sovereign nations, tribal natural resource departments, tribally-led cultural fire management organizations, and indigenous communities to help advance Opportunities for Maximizing Prescribed Burning in Oregon. My name is Belinda Brown, and I am an enrolled member of the Kosealekte Band of the Ajumawi-Atsuge Nation, formally recognized by the federal government as the Pit River Tribe. Our ancestral land base encompasses a “hundred mile square” that spans from the four northeastern-most counties of California—Modoc, Lassen, Shasta and Siskiyou—across stateliness into the Goose Lake Valley of Lake County in Oregon. I am also descended from the Gidutikad Band of the Northern Paiute, whose ancestral land base stretches from Warner Valley in Oregon to Surprise Valley in California, reaching across what is now called the Modoc National Forest into the Fremont-Winema National Forest. I present this testimony as a traditional cultural practitioner who grew up practicing aboriginal fire use, and also in my current capacity as Tribal Partnerships Director for Lomakatsi Restoration Project, a non- profit organization based in Ashland, Oregon, and as Chairwoman for the Inter-Tribal Ecosystem Restoration Partnership. I have previously served as a tribal elected official, holding office on the Pit River Tribal Council and as a Cultural Representative. My homeland encompasses the vegetation gradients of juniper woodland sagebrush steppe habitat, to ponderosa pine bitterbrush, to mixed conifer systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Birding in the Missoula and Bitterroot Valleys
    Birding in the Missoula and Bitterroot Valleys Five Valleys and Bitterroot Audubon Society Chapters are grassroots volunteer organizations of Montana Audubon and the National Audubon Society. We promote understanding, respect, and enjoyment of birds and the natural world through education, habitat protection, and environmental advocacy. Five Valleys Bitterroot Audubon Society Audubon Society P.O. Box 8425 P.O. Box 326 Missoula, MT 59807 Hamilton, MT 59840 www.fvaudubon.org/ www.bitterrootaudubonorg/ Montana Audubon P.O. Box 595 Helena, MT 59624 406-443-3949 www.mtaudubon.org Status W Sp Su F Bird Species of West-central Montana (most vagrants excluded) _ Harlequin Duck B r r r Relative abundance in suitable habitat by season are: _ Long-tailed Duck t r r c - common to abundant, usually found on every visit in _ Surf Scoter t r r r moderate to large numbers _ White-winged Scoter t r r r u - uncommon, usually present in low numbers but may be _ Common Goldeneye B c c c c _ missed Barrow’s Goldeneye B u c c c _ o - occasional, seen only a few times during the season, not Bufflehead B o c u c _ Hooded Merganser B o c c c present in all suitable habitat _ Common Merganser B c c c c r - rare, one to low numbers occur but not every year _ Red-breasted Merganser t o o _ Status: Ruddy Duck B c c c _ Osprey B c c c B - Direct evidence of breeding _ Bald Eagle B c c c c b - Indirect evidence of breeding _ Northern Harrier B u c c c t - No evidence of breeding _ Sharp-shinned Hawk B u u u u _ Cooper’s Hawk B u u u u Season of occurrence: _ Northern Goshawk B u u u u W - Winter, mid-November to mid-February _ Swainson’s Hawk B u u u Sp - Spring, mid-February to mid-May _ Red-tailed Hawk B c c c c Su - Summer, mid-May to mid-August _ Ferruginous Hawk t r r r F - Fall, mid-August to mid-November _ Rough-legged Hawk t c c c _ Golden Eagle B u u u u This list follows the seventh edition of the AOU check-list.
    [Show full text]
  • EXHIBIT P – Application for Site Certificate
    EXHIBIT P – Application for Site Certificate FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT OAR 345-021-0010(1)(p) REVIEWER CHECKLIST (p) Exhibit P. Information about the fish and wildlife habitat and the fish and wildlife species, other than the species addressed in subsection (q) that could be affected by the proposed facility, providing evidence to support a finding by the Council as required by OAR 345-022- 0060. The applicant shall include: Rule Sections Section (A) A description of biological and botanical surveys performed that support the P.2 information in this exhibit, including a discussion of the timing and scope of each survey. (B) Identification of all fish and wildlife habitat in the analysis area, classified by the P.3 general fish and wildlife habitat categories as set forth in OAR 635-415-0025 and the sage-grouse specific habitats described in the Greater Sage-Grouse Conservation Strategy for Oregon at OAR 635-140-0000 through -0025 (core, low density, and general habitats), and a description of the characteristics and condition of that habitat in the analysis area, including a table of the areas of permanent disturbance and temporary disturbance (in acres) in each habitat category and subtype. (C) A map showing the locations of the habitat identified in (B). P.4 (D) Based on consultation with the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) P.5 and appropriate field study and literature review, identification of all State Sensitive Species that might be present in the analysis area and a discussion of any site- specific issues of concern to ODFW. (E) A baseline survey of the use of habitat in the analysis area by species identified in P.6 (D) performed according to a protocol approved by the Department and ODFW.
    [Show full text]
  • National Shorebird Plan (NSP)
    Revised January 29, 2013 U.S. Shorebird Conservation Plan Intermountain West Regional Shorebird Plan Version 1.0 by: Lewis W. Oring Larry Neel Kay E. Oring 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary ……………………………………………………………………………...3 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………….4 1. Description of Intermountain West…………………………………………………….….….4 A. Shorebird habitat types within the region………………………………….……….……..4 B. Bird Conservation Regions (BCR)…...……………………………………….……..…....6 C. Major shorebird issues in the Intermountain West region…………………….….…...…10 2. Shorebird species occurrence in the Intermountain West……………………………….…..12 A. Regional shorebird list………………………………………………………….…..…....12 B. Bird Conservation Region lists to describe different parts of the region………………...12 C. Priority shorebirds…………………………………………………………………….…13 D. Shorebird guilds…………………………………………………………………..……...13 3. Intermountain West regional goals…………………………………………………...……...13 4. Habitat report………………………………………………………………………………...20 5. Intermountain West research and monitoring needs……………..……………………….….20 6. Funding needs to meet regional goals……………………………………………………..…20 7. Management coordination issues and needs…………………………………………………20 8. Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………………….…….21 Appendix I. Key shorebird areas of the Intermountain West: Great Salt Lake…………….…..22 Appendix II. Key shorebird areas of the Intermountain West: Salton Sea………………..…….25 Appendix III. Key shorebird areas of the Intermountain West: Lake Abert………………..……27 Appendix IV. Key shorebird areas of the Intermountain
    [Show full text]
  • A Portion of South-Central Oregon
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIRECTOR WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 220 GEOLOGY AND WATER RESOURCES OF A PORTION OF SOUTH-CENTRAL OREGON BY GERALD A. WARING WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT FEINTING OFFICE 1908 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIKEOTOK WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 22O GEOLOGY AND WATER RESOURCES OF A PORTION OF SOUTH-CENTRAL OREGON BY GERALD A. WARING WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1908 CONTENTS. Vage. Introduction.............................................................. 7 Objects of reconnaissance.............................................. 7 Area examined........................................................ 7 Acknowledgements..................................................... 8 Previous study......................................................... 8 Geography................................................................. 9 General features....................................................... 9 Topography............................................................. 9 Mountains........................................................ 9 Scarps.............................................................. 9 Minor features..................................................... 10 Lakes.................................................................. 11 Character of the lakes................................................ 12 Alkalinity........................................................ 12 . Climate...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Biologicalopinion.Pdf
    Enclosure—Discussion of Individual Species WHOOPING CRANE STATUS OF THE SPECIES Description The Whooping Crane is in the Family Gruidae, Order Gruiformes (Krajewski 1989, Meine and Archibald 1996). The common name "whooping crane" probably originated from the loud, single- note vocalization given repeatedly by the birds when they are alarmed. As the tallest North American bird, males approach 1.5 m (5 ft) when standing erect, and exceed the greater sandhill crane in height by 12 to 20 cm (5 to 8 in). Males are generally larger than females. Adult plumage is snowy white except for black primaries, black or grayish alulae, sparse black bristly feathers on the carmine crown and malar region, and a dark gray-black wedge-shaped patch on the nape. The juvenile plumage is a reddish cinnamon color. Juveniles achieve typically adult plumage late in their second summer. Distribution and Abundance Whooping cranes occur only in North America within Canada and the United States. Approximately 96% of the wild nesting sites occur in Canada and the balance in Florida. Fifty- eight percent of the December, 2003 wild population (185 of 317 individuals) had summered in Canada, with 87 in Florida and 36 in the Wisconsin – Florida population. Seventeen percent of the captive individuals (19) remain in Canada and the balance (95 cranes) is in the United States. The Aransas-Wood Buffalo National Park Population contained 194 individuals in December, 2003 and is the only self-sustaining wild population. This population nests in the Northwest Territories and adjacent areas of Alberta, Canada, primarily within the boundary of Wood Buffalo National Park (Johns 1998b).
    [Show full text]
  • Ty, Oregon Has 1145 Acres Total Deeded Land; 364 on Westside Road in Lakeview and 780 Acres in Yocum Valley Which Is Approx
    The Westside Ranch in Lake Coun- ty, Oregon has 1145 acres total Deeded land; 364 on Westside Road in Lakeview and 780 acres in Yocum Valley which is approx. 12 miles west of the main ranch. This cattle ranch has potential to be a year round or seasonal operation, with 253 acres of primary water rights and 31 acres of supplemental rights from Lakeview Water Users for the main ranch. Included in the offering are a newer Reinke Pivot, Valley Pivot, two wheel lines, cor- rals, 4 bed 2 bath stick built home that has been recently remodeled. On the Yocum Valley deeded ground there is sub irrigation (no water rights), with range land and some timber. There are no improvements on this portion and is used in conjunction with a Forest Service Permit - Dog Lake, Yocum Valley and Stateline allotment that is for 175 pairs from July 1 to Sept 30. This is a great area for both hunting and fishing - waterfowl, mule deer and antelope hunting. Sellers say this can be a year round 200 cow oper- ation -- grow your own hay & feed! Some equipment may be available outside of escrow, as well as 180 mostly black cows and 4 bulls. Crater Lake Realty, Inc. Chiloquin, Oregon Linda Long, Principal Broker/Owner 541-891-5562 [email protected] Lake County, Oregon, Southern Part (OR636) Sum- mary by Map Unit — Westside Road only. sym- Acres Percent Map unit name bol AOI of AOI Drews loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes, goose 73B 163.0 42.9% lake valley, northern part, mlra 21 73C Drews loam, 5 to 15 percent slopes 11.8 3.1% Lakeview-Stockdrive complex, 0 to 2 per-
    [Show full text]
  • Goose and Summer Lakes Basin Report
    GOOSE AND SUMMER LAKES BASIN REPORT. State of Oregon WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Salem, Oregon May 1989 WILLIAM H. YOUNG, DIRECTOR WATER RESOURCES COMMISSION Members: WILLIAM R. BLOSSER. CHAIRMAN HADLEY AKINS CLIFF BENTZ CLAUDE CURRAN JAMES HOWLAND DEIRDRE MALARKEY LORNA STICKEL TABLE OF CONTENTS IN1RODUCTION........................................................................................................... v A. Purpose of Report.......................................................................................... v B. Planning Process ............................................................................................ v C. Report Organization .... .... .... .................... .. ...... ...... ...... ...................... .... ....... vi SECTION 1. GOOSE AND SUMMER LAKES BASIN OVERVIEW....................... 1 A. Physical Description...................................................................................... 1 B. Cultural Description ...................................................................................... 9 C. Resources...................................................................................................... 12 D. Water Use and Control ................................................................................. 15 SECTION 2. THOMAS CREEK .................................................................................. 23 A. Issue.............................................................................................................. 23 B. Background..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater Compliance Action Plan for the Lakeview, Oregon, Processing Site
    LMS/LKP/S06182 Groundwater Compliance Action Plan for the Lakeview, Oregon, Processing Site June 2010 This page intentionally left blank LMS/LKP/S06182 Groundwater Compliance Action Plan for the Lakeview, Oregon, Processing Site June 2010 This page intentionally left blank Contents Abbreviations................................................................................................................................. iii 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................1–1 1.1 Previous Site Documentation ...................................................................................1–1 1.2 Regulatory Framework .............................................................................................1–1 1.3 Groundwater Compliance Status ..............................................................................1–2 2.0 Site Information..................................................................................................................2–1 2.1 Location ....................................................................................................................2–1 2.2 Remedial Action History and Current Land Status ..................................................2–1 2.3 Site Characteristics ...................................................................................................2–1 2.3.1 Climate...........................................................................................................2–1 2.3.2
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon Ohv Guide
    2020 OREGON OHV GUIDE oregonOHV.org YOUR OHV Funds At Work rideATVoregon.org 1-877-7SAFELY 1-877-772-3359 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ...................................................4 2. Oregon ATV Laws and Rules...............................6 Types of ATVs and Requirements ................ 6 Operating Permits, Titles, Registration & Insurance ..................................................11 Frequently Asked Questions ........................12 OHV Equipment Requirements ...................15 ATV Violations ..............................................17 3. ATV Safety Training ........................................ 18 Class I ATV (Quads, 3-wheelers) ................18 Class II ATV (Jeeps, Sand Rails, SUVs, etc.) .................................18 Class III ATV (Motorcycles) .........................19 Class IV ATV (Side-by-sides) .......................19 4. Personal Safety Equipment .............................. 20 5. ATVs and Hunting ........................................... 20 6. Where to Ride ................................................. 21 Tips ...............................................................22 Where to Ride (map) ...................................24 7. Plan Your Trip ................................................. 53 Riding in the Dunes .....................................54 ATVs on Forest Trails ...................................55 ATVs in the High Desert ..............................56 8. Protecting Your Privilege ................................. 58 Riding Responsibility ...................................58
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment Lakeview Geothermal Project
    Environmental Assessment Lakeview Geothermal Project April 2012 One Embarcadero Center, Suite 740 San Francisco, CA 94111 650-373-1200 www.panoramaenv.com Environmental Assessment Lakeview Geothermal Project Lake County, Oregon Prepared For: US Department of Agriculture, Rural Development 1201 NE Lloyd Blvd, Suite 801 Portland, Oregon 97232‐1274 Prepared By: Panorama Environmental, Inc. One Embarcadero Center, Suite 740 San Francisco, CA 94111 650‐373‐1200 One Embarcadero Center, Suite 740 San Francisco, CA 94111 650-373-1200 www.panoramaenv.com TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 National Environmental Policy Act .................................................................................... 1 1.2 Background ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.3 Purpose and Need ................................................................................................................. 1 1.3.1 USDA’s Purpose and Need ......................................................................................... 1 1.3.2 Oregon’s Purpose and Need ....................................................................................... 4 1.4 Public and Agency Involvement ......................................................................................... 4 2 USDA’s Proposed Action and the Proposed Project .........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • KLAMATH /\MATII INI)IANJRE,Setht Y C: Et I
    ranlinr - 4. Ii.(fI4O1 cl r9\ 5s C ' ETHNOGRAPHIC s'..L- tcH p' )T\' r SKETCH :sci41J OF THE f: Pr5T1 -11E1 L 1 ttc!f\\ \AKLAMATH /\MATII INI)IANJRE,SEThT y C: Et I. L/"° kt, INDIANS ckt1IPK / 41(chat,rc F % A" .. OF SOUTHWESTERN OREGON N 'I S j bli C' ''U OX] by ALBERT SAMUELGATSCHET 4 I'VYA - I) S. C Cm DIP. TIMPEN '4?. .1 4f.thrth' DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U. 8. GEOGRAPHICAL AND GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN REGION J. W. POWELL IN CHARGE Ethnographic Sketch of THE KLAMATH I.XDIAKS op SOUTHWESTERN OREGON ALBERT SAMUEL GATSCHET An Extract from CONTRIBUTIONS TO NORTH AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY, Vol.II, part I. WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1890 FACSIMILE REPRODUCTION 1966 THE SHOREY BOOK STORE 815 Third Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 SJS # 118 ETHNOGRAPHIC SKETCH OF THE KALAMATH INDIANS FOURTH PRINTING Of Facsimile Reprint Limited to 150 Copies November 1973 ISBN # 0-8466-0118-4 (InPaper Covers) ISBN # 0-8466-2118-5 (InPublisher's LibraryBindings) CONTENTS Page Letter of Transmittal Vii Ethnographic sketch ix Introduction to the texts 1 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL. SMiTHSONIAN INSTITUTION, BUREAU OF ETHNOLOGY, Washington, D. C., June 25, 1890. SIR: I have the honor to transmit toyou my report upon the Kiamath Indians of Southwestern Oregon, the result of long and patient study.It deals with their beliefs, legends, and traditions, theirgovernment and social life, their racial and somatic peculiarities, and,more extensively, with their language.To this the reader is introduced bynumerous ethnographic "Texts," suggested or dictated
    [Show full text]