DOCSLIB.ORG

Oregon Cougar Management Plan Draft Update

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Attachment 2 Oregon Cougar Management Plan Draft Update Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife July 2017 Oregon Cougar Management Plan Draft Update (07/20/17) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY July 2017 The 2017 Oregon Cougar Management Plan updates the 2006 Oregon Cougar Management Plan. This update will guide Oregon’s cougar management, and provides strategies for resolution of human conflicts with cougars. This plan revision process was initiated in April 2016 when two panels of invited stakeholders provided testimony and written recommendations at the April Commission meeting. Next steps included stakeholder meetings in late summer and a staff presentation and public testimony at the October Commission Meeting. Informal/impromptu communications occurred with local sporting groups, state agencies, landowner groups, wildlife researchers, and other interested parties throughout the entire duration of this process. The draft plan chapters include information on Oregon cougars; cougar management objectives; and cougar management goals incorporated into an adaptive management approach for the future. These chapters contain a significant amount of information and data on cougar biology, population trends, research findings, damage and conflict, and management activities. Similar to the 2006 Plan, this draft plan establishes objectives that seek to maintain viable and healthy cougar populations in Oregon, reduce conflicts with cougars, and manage cougars in a manner compatible with other game mammal species. Objective 1 seeks to manage the state’s cougar population at a level well above that required for long term sustainability. Achieving and monitoring this objective is complicated but empirical data and numerous indices can be used to assess population status. Because the minimum population objective is well above the level of sustainability, and because of the demonstrated resilience of cougar populations (Cougar Management Guidelines, 2005, page 40), exact counts of cougars are not necessary to achieve Objective 1. To accomplish this objective, several strategies have been employed. Zone management with mortality quotas will be used to ensure harvest does not reduce the population below objective levels. Harvest can occur at three levels of intensity to allow for maintenance of source and sink populations. Two indicators of cougar abundance will be used. A deterministic, density dependent population model, which utilizes data collected from all cougar mortalities in Oregon, will be used for predicting outcomes on a short-term basis in an adaptive management approach (Cougar Management Guidelines, 2005, page 58). Proportion of adult females in the harvest will also be used to monitor cougar population trajectory. In addition, data will continue to be collected in more intensive, smaller scale research studies (Cougar Management Guidelines, 2005, page 77) as well as developing alternative population models that could incorporate stochastic variability for each zone. Objectives 2 – 3 address solving conflict. The primary strategy to solve conflict since 1995 has been to give advice and, when necessary, remove the problem animal. While damage and conflict have remained relatively stable in much of Oregon, conflict has increased as cougars have expanded into previously unoccupied habitats of human habitation. Human population increases in some parts of the state have exacerbated the problem. Steps necessary to achieve these objectives are straightforward and do not depend on cougar population estimates. In addition to advice and removal of specific cougars, specific areas with elevated conflict may also I Oregon Cougar Management Plan Draft Update (07/20/17) be targeted to reduce conflict by reducing cougar numbers. These targeted areas are intended to create a buffer of low cougar density, thereby reducing conflict. Objective 4 seeks to achieve established management objectives for other game mammal species. Only those Wildlife Management Units (WMU’s) where elk or deer populations are below established management objectives, have shown a history of decline and lack of ability to sustain themselves, and where evidence indicates cougar predation is a primary factor may be targeted for cougar population reduction. For bighorn sheep, areas around specific herds will be targeted when evidence indicates cougar predation is a primary factor. All management activities will be carried out in an adaptive management approach, as suggested in the Cougar Management Guidelines (2005, pages 74 and 81), which allows for monitoring, evaluation, and changes in management based on results. Those strategies that are not successful at meeting stated objectives would be modified or discontinued. Numerous indicators will be used to monitor success. Total mortality, hunter harvest success rates, and biological data will continue to be collected. These data will contribute to population modeling for each Cougar Management Zone. Cougar-human conflict will continue to be monitored using non-hunting mortalities and complaints concerning human safety, pets, and livestock. Research projects will collect information on movements, density, predation rates, and will be able to better detect other factors such as disease. ODFW’s mission is to protect and enhance Oregon’s fish and wildlife and their habitats for use and enjoyment by present and future generations. Cougar management is complicated by the dichotomy of sentiment toward cougars among Oregon residents. This plan presents ODFW’s strategy to meet its mission and incorporate public attitudes and desires. It is a plan that will be updated and rewritten as agency policies, new biological data, and human and/or cougar populations change. II Oregon Cougar Management Plan Draft Update (07/20/17) TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................... I TABLE OF CONTENTS .........................................................................................................................III LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................................... VI LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................ VII PURPOSE OF THE PLAN ................................................................................................................... VIII CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 CHAPTER II: INFORMATION ON OREGON COUGARS ................................................................ 4 History and Range .................................................................................................................................. 4 Reproduction and Productivity ............................................................................................................. 6 Dispersal and Connectivity .................................................................................................................... 6 Landscape Genetics ................................................................................................................................ 7 Density ...................................................................................................................................................... 8 Cougar Interactions with Ungulates ................................................................................................... 10 Cougar Interactions with Other Carnivores ...................................................................................... 15 Cougar Habitat...................................................................................................................................... 18 Habitat Distribution .......................................................................................................................... 19 Cougars and Urban Landscapes ...................................................................................................... 20 Age and Sex Structure .......................................................................................................................... 22 Hunting and Hunter Harvest ............................................................................................................... 26 License and Tags ............................................................................................................................... 26 Hunting Techniques and Harvest .................................................................................................... 27 Hunt Structure .................................................................................................................................. 27 Impact of Hunting on Cougar Populations ..................................................................................... 28 Impact of Hunting on Population Trajectory in Oregon .............................................................. 29 Illegal Kill .............................................................................................................................................. 32 Damage and Safety Mortalities ............................................................................................................ 32 Administrative Removals ....................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • What to See in Portland Update2009

    What to See in Portland Update2009

    What to see in Portland, OR - by Marco Behrmann 07/02/2004 1/3 WHAT TO SEE IN PORTLAND , OR _________________________________________ Listed below you will find a couple of sights and my personal favourites to do in Portland. Since Portland was my town of exchange I do not know as many things about the other cities like Eugene, Corvallis, Ashland or La Grande. However, it would be just great if somebody could add tips about their places similar to the ones here, too! Please feel free to forward them to me (marcobehrmann[at]web.de ). I do not want you to believe that just because I stayed in Portland, and have many tips here for Portland, that a year at one of the other Oregon cities is not the same exciting. The tips listed here, however, are interesting for all Baden-Wuerttemberg students in Oregon, because many things you can already see and experience during your orientation weeks. (BTW: This is almost everything I did (among other things, of course) within my 2 ½ weeks of re-visiting in June 2004; but it took me a year of living in the city in 2001/02 to figure out which were the hot tips ☺) Here are my personal Must-Sees Oregon History Center in SW Park blocks right south of PSU (This museum features very interesting and well researched exhibitions about the development of Portland as a city as well as about the whole Pacific Northwest as it was discovered from the sea and the Columbia River; good place to check out during your orientation weeks; you get a student reduction with ISIC or other student ID card) Council Crest Park (considered the highest spot in Portland; nice views to Mt Hood, Mt Adams, Mt St Helens and even Mt Rainier on some days as well as to Beaverton; take Bus 51 [Vista]; the Bus driver often feels himself as an informal Portland guide; tell him that you are visiting and he even might stop for you at nice viewpoints to take pictures.
  • 1 Senate Committee on Natural Resources and Wildfire Recovery

    1 Senate Committee on Natural Resources and Wildfire Recovery

    Senate Committee On Natural Resources and Wildfire Recovery Oregon State Capitol 900 Court Street NE Salem, Oregon 97301 February 3, 2021 Chair Golden, Vice Chair Heard and distinguished Committee Members, thank you for the opportunity to appear before you today. I’m going to share about the importance of engaging tribal sovereign nations, tribal natural resource departments, tribally-led cultural fire management organizations, and indigenous communities to help advance Opportunities for Maximizing Prescribed Burning in Oregon. My name is Belinda Brown, and I am an enrolled member of the Kosealekte Band of the Ajumawi-Atsuge Nation, formally recognized by the federal government as the Pit River Tribe. Our ancestral land base encompasses a “hundred mile square” that spans from the four northeastern-most counties of California—Modoc, Lassen, Shasta and Siskiyou—across stateliness into the Goose Lake Valley of Lake County in Oregon. I am also descended from the Gidutikad Band of the Northern Paiute, whose ancestral land base stretches from Warner Valley in Oregon to Surprise Valley in California, reaching across what is now called the Modoc National Forest into the Fremont-Winema National Forest. I present this testimony as a traditional cultural practitioner who grew up practicing aboriginal fire use, and also in my current capacity as Tribal Partnerships Director for Lomakatsi Restoration Project, a non- profit organization based in Ashland, Oregon, and as Chairwoman for the Inter-Tribal Ecosystem Restoration Partnership. I have previously served as a tribal elected official, holding office on the Pit River Tribal Council and as a Cultural Representative. My homeland encompasses the vegetation gradients of juniper woodland sagebrush steppe habitat, to ponderosa pine bitterbrush, to mixed conifer systems.
  • Gardensmart Oregon Was Created By: Oregon Is a Gardener’S Dream

    Gardensmart Oregon Was Created By: Oregon Is a Gardener’S Dream

    Thanks to: Printed on recycled paper, chlorine-free, acid-free process, with soy-based ink. BES WS 0825 © 2008 Free-not for sale. EC 1620 A gardener’s dream GardenSmart Oregon was created by: Oregon is a gardener’s dream. Our varied climates and mild conditions allow Jennifer Goodridge, Mitch Bixby, and Leslie Winter-Gorsline, us to showcase a wide variety of plants from around the world. In fact, Bureau of Environmental Services, City of Portland nursery crops are Oregon’s number one agricultural commodity. Mandy Tu and Stephen Anderson, The Nature Conservancy Renee Harber, Oregon Association of Nurseries and Clackamas Community College Unfortunately, a few plants used in gardens and landscapes cause serious ecological harm by ‘jumping the fence’ and spreading elsewhere. These Jeff Douglas, Oregon Public Broadcasting invasive plants can become serious problems that threaten water quality, Linda McMahan, Oregon State University Extension Service wildlife and our economy by crowding out native plants, changing stream Samuel Chan, Oregon Sea Grant and OSU Extension Service flows, increasing erosion, competing with crops or creating fire hazards. We are grateful for technical assistance provided by the Oregon Department of This booklet offers gardeners and landscape designers many choices of Agriculture, USDA Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, Marion Soil plants that work for gardens while protecting the health and beauty of and Water Conservation District, 4-County Cooperative Weed Management Area, Oregon’s natural lands and waters. We highlight plants that should be Oregon Association of Nurseries Natural Resources Committee, Salix Associates, Wallowa Resources, Northwest Weed Management Partnership, East Multnomah avoided because they are invasive, and offer non-invasive alternatives (both Soil and Water Conservation District, Sara McFarland, West Multnomah Soil and natives and non-native ornamentals) that you can safely plant instead.
  • EXHIBIT P – Application for Site Certificate

    EXHIBIT P – Application for Site Certificate

    EXHIBIT P – Application for Site Certificate FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT OAR 345-021-0010(1)(p) REVIEWER CHECKLIST (p) Exhibit P. Information about the fish and wildlife habitat and the fish and wildlife species, other than the species addressed in subsection (q) that could be affected by the proposed facility, providing evidence to support a finding by the Council as required by OAR 345-022- 0060. The applicant shall include: Rule Sections Section (A) A description of biological and botanical surveys performed that support the P.2 information in this exhibit, including a discussion of the timing and scope of each survey. (B) Identification of all fish and wildlife habitat in the analysis area, classified by the P.3 general fish and wildlife habitat categories as set forth in OAR 635-415-0025 and the sage-grouse specific habitats described in the Greater Sage-Grouse Conservation Strategy for Oregon at OAR 635-140-0000 through -0025 (core, low density, and general habitats), and a description of the characteristics and condition of that habitat in the analysis area, including a table of the areas of permanent disturbance and temporary disturbance (in acres) in each habitat category and subtype. (C) A map showing the locations of the habitat identified in (B). P.4 (D) Based on consultation with the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) P.5 and appropriate field study and literature review, identification of all State Sensitive Species that might be present in the analysis area and a discussion of any site- specific issues of concern to ODFW. (E) A baseline survey of the use of habitat in the analysis area by species identified in P.6 (D) performed according to a protocol approved by the Department and ODFW.
  • 2020 Spring Zootracks

    2020 Spring Zootracks

    ZooTracks IT’S ALL ABOUT YOUR OREGON ZOO Painted Pupdate Donors support keeper’s first visit to Africa All she could manage to say was, “Dog! Dog! Dog!” The driver slammed on the brakes to avoid spooking the pack of African painted dogs lounging near the road in the early morning. The truck was packed with people and gear — solar panels, batteries and supplies for living on the savanna. For days, they had scanned the roadside for tracks, and Beth Foster worried she might return to Oregon without ever seeing the animal that brought her here. After almost 20 years as a keeper, caring primarily for lions and painted dogs, this was the first time she had seen dogs in the wild. Thanks to a grant, generously funded by donors to the Oregon Zoo Foundation, Foster spent two weeks working with Greg Rasmussen at the Painted Dog Research Trust in Zimbabwe, an organization she and the Oregon Zoo have collaborated with for years. The trust’s mission is to save this highly endangered species while training local graduate students in the rigors of conservation and scientific field research. “I'm almost 50,” Foster said. “I've worked with African animals for my whole career, and I hadn't gone to Africa — to finally have that opportunity was amazing!” Foster traveled to the trust’s headquarters near Victoria Falls with longtime ZooGuide volunteer Roger Williams. As soon as they arrived, they were put to work. The two spent their days building a much-needed storage shed, collecting water and doing anything they could to help.
  • Little White Salmon

    Little White Salmon

    Lower Columbia Salmon Recovery And Fish & Wildlife Subbasin Plan Volume II – Subbasin Plan Chapter K – Little White Salmon Lower Columbia Fish Recovery Board December 15, 2004 Preface This is one in a series of volumes that together comprise a Recovery and Subbasin Plan for Washington lower Columbia River salmon and steelhead: -- Plan Overview Overview of the planning process and regional and subbasin elements of the plan. Vol. I Regional Plan Regional framework for recovery identifying species, limiting factors and threats, the scientific foundation for recovery, biological objectives, strategies, measures, and implementation. Vol. II Subbasin Plans Subbasin vision, assessments, and management plan for each of 12 Washington lower Columbia River subbasins consistent with the Regional Plan. These volumes describe implementation of the regional plan at the subbasin level. II.A. Lower Columbia Mainstem and Estuary II.B. Estuary Tributaries II.C. Grays Subbasin II.D. Elochoman Subbasin II.E. Cowlitz Subbasin II.F. Kalama Subbasin II.G. Lewis Subbasin II.H. Lower Columbia Tributaries II.I. Washougal Subbasin II.J. Wind Subbasin II.K. Little White Salmon Subbasin II.L. Columbia Gorge Tributaries Appdx. A Focal Fish Species Species overviews and status assessments for lower Columbia River Chinook salmon, coho salmon, chum salmon, steelhead, and bull trout. Appdx. B Other Species Descriptions, status, and limiting factors of other fish and wildlife species of interest to recovery and subbasin planning. Appdx. C Program Directory Descriptions of federal, state, local, tribal, and non- governmental programs and projects that affect or are affected by recovery and subbasin planning. Appdx. D Economic Framework Potential costs and economic considerations for recovery and subbasin planning.
  • National Shorebird Plan (NSP)

    National Shorebird Plan (NSP)

    Revised January 29, 2013 U.S. Shorebird Conservation Plan Intermountain West Regional Shorebird Plan Version 1.0 by: Lewis W. Oring Larry Neel Kay E. Oring 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary ……………………………………………………………………………...3 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………….4 1. Description of Intermountain West…………………………………………………….….….4 A. Shorebird habitat types within the region………………………………….……….……..4 B. Bird Conservation Regions (BCR)…...……………………………………….……..…....6 C. Major shorebird issues in the Intermountain West region…………………….….…...…10 2. Shorebird species occurrence in the Intermountain West……………………………….…..12 A. Regional shorebird list………………………………………………………….…..…....12 B. Bird Conservation Region lists to describe different parts of the region………………...12 C. Priority shorebirds…………………………………………………………………….…13 D. Shorebird guilds…………………………………………………………………..……...13 3. Intermountain West regional goals…………………………………………………...……...13 4. Habitat report………………………………………………………………………………...20 5. Intermountain West research and monitoring needs……………..……………………….….20 6. Funding needs to meet regional goals……………………………………………………..…20 7. Management coordination issues and needs…………………………………………………20 8. Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………………….…….21 Appendix I. Key shorebird areas of the Intermountain West: Great Salt Lake…………….…..22 Appendix II. Key shorebird areas of the Intermountain West: Salton Sea………………..…….25 Appendix III. Key shorebird areas of the Intermountain West: Lake Abert………………..……27 Appendix IV. Key shorebird areas of the Intermountain
  • Fall 2014 | Oregon Zoo Foundation

    Fall 2014 | Oregon Zoo Foundation

    Fall 2014 | Oregon Zoo Foundation From the interim director Creating a world-class elephant habitat When was your last providing guests with exciting new viewing Since the birth of Packy in 1962, than the current elephant habitat, visit to the Oregon opportunities. the Oregon Zoo’s elephants have it will extend around the eastern Zoo? Chances are, inspired millions of visitors to edge of the zoo and encompass These important projects are funded by you came away appreciate and care about wildlife. rolling meadows, 4-foot-deep sand the 2008 zoo bond and demonstrate the awestruck by the In February 2014, the celebrated yards and one of the world’s largest zoo’s commitment to fulfill our promise to wonder and beauty of herd stepped into a new era when indoor elephant facilities, offering voters: increasing capacity for conservation the animals and their they walked into the first portion of stunning views of the Oregon education, protecting animal health and surroundings. Our their new habitat, Elephant Lands. Zoo herd. safety, and improving sustainability through The most ambitious project in the mission is to inspire “To thrive at the Oregon Zoo, new exhibits. Oregon Zoo’s 125-year history, our guests to take action on their behalf. elephants need to move, interact As part of Metro, the zoo continues to play Elephant Lands brings together The past year has been one of the most with other members of the herd a central role in preserving the region’s science-based care and thoughtful pivotal in Oregon Zoo history. Thanks and the males need to be able to natural beauty and supporting a thriving design to produce an amazing to support from our community, we come in and out of the herd as economy.
  • Searching for Oregon Silverspot Butterfly (Speyeria Zerene Hippolyta

    Searching for Oregon Silverspot Butterfly (Speyeria Zerene Hippolyta

    Use of Canines to Detect Early Life History Stages of a Threatened Butterfly Cody Burkhart Rich Van Buskirk Environmental Science Pacific University Extinction Rates Ceballos et al., 2015 Taxonomic Bias • International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) • Endangered Species Act (ESA) • Documenting insect extinctions are currently underrepresented (Dunn, 2005) 500 450 400 350 300 250 200 Number ofSpecies Number Insects 150 100 50 0 Vertebrates Invertebrates Mammals Birds Reptiles Amphibians Fishes Clams Snails Insects Arachnids Crustaceans Corals U.S Fish and Wildlife Service, 2017 Causes of Decline 90 80 70 60 50 40 Percentage 30 20 10 0 Resource Use Exotic Species Construction Altered Habitat Agriculture Species Pollution Water Dynamics Interactions Diversions (non-exotics) Lawler et al., 2002 Insect Conservation: Large Blue Butterfly (Maculinea arion) Photo By: PJC&CO from Wikimedia Commons Large Blue Butterfly • Early responses focused on habitat restoration • Critical life history stage relied on Myrmica sabuleti ants • Extirpated in the UK in 1979 Conservation Implications • Species decline can be reversible • Understanding life history is essential Oregon Silverspot Butterfly (Speyeria zerene hippolyta) • OSB Habitat: – Early successional communities – Salt-spray meadows – Oregon Coast and northern California coast. – Extirpated in Washington. • Larval host plant: early blue violet (Viola adunca) (Oregon Zoo 2009) History of Decline • Habitat loss U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2001 Remaining Threats • Succession 6000 • Invasive species 5000 4000 3000 Cascade Head Rock Creek Mount Hebo 2000 Oregon Silverspot Butterfly Population Numbers Population Butterfly Silverspot Oregon 1000 0 Year OSB Life Cycle Oregon Zoo, 2009 The Conservation Canines Project • Determine feasibility of using scent detection dogs to locate cryptic life history stages • Assess dynamics of pilot search project Mt.
  • Washington Park South Entry Vision

    Washington Park South Entry Vision

    WASHINGTON PARK SOUTH ENTRY VISION September 2012 V.V.O.M. WORLD FORESTRY CENTER PORTLAND CHILDREN’S MUSEUM TRI-MET OREGON ZOO Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION 2 THE STORY 14 THE SOLUTION 27 PHASING AND COST 27 NEXT STEPS 29 APPENDIX METRO / Portland Parks & Recreation / Washington Park Alliance i SEPTEMBER 2012 WASHINGTON PARK SOUTH ENTRY VISION INTRODUCTION This South Entry Vision report was commissioned by Metro and Portland » Creates a new entrance alignment and features, including stormwater, to Parks & Recreation (PP&R), on behalf of the Washington Park Alliance work with the proposed new drop-off and pick-up at the Oregon Zoo’s (WPA), to further develop the WPA’s Washington Park South Entry & proposed new Conservation Discovery Zone (CDZ). Parking Vision Study, dated April 20, 2011. » Consolidates most of the parking in a new structure built above grade, north of the TriMet station, to allow for more usable green, park space The scope of the original 2011 vision was to look at how to enhance the between the institutions; and character, clarify circulation, create a common green open space by replacing surface parking with a parking structure and improve pedestrian safety in » Provides a preliminary strategy for phasing and estimated project costs. the entire Washington Park south entry and parking area. A conceptual » PP&R intends to incorporate this report into a future update of the scheme was developed that met the WPA’s goals to create a common green Washington Park Master Plan. that enhanced the arrival experience into the park and met the collective needs of all the cultural institutions in the park.
  • Ebook Download Sightseeing

    Ebook Download Sightseeing

    SIGHTSEEING PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Rattawut Lapcharoensap | 250 pages | 09 Jan 2006 | Grove Press / Atlantic Monthly Press | 9780802142344 | English | New York, United States Sightseeing PDF Book Success can be as simple as sightseeing or farm visits. Guangzhou Metro reviews. Visitors wanting a little less physical activity can easily hop on the Historic Columbia River Scenic Byway to explore a lush world of waterfalls. Accommodation: Where to Stay in Cannon Beach. Canton Fair helper. Axe to Grind 3 reviews. Canton Tower 3, reviews. Pearl River Zhujiang reviews. Locked Manhattan reviews. Widgets Family Fun Center 12 reviews. A great first stop when visiting the monument is the Lava Lands Visitor Center. Things to do near Flint Hills Discovery Center. Sunset Zoo reviews. Colbert Hills 7 reviews. Oregon in Pictures: 20 Beautiful Places to Photograph. See 91 Experiences. See 31 Experiences. In the far northwest corner of Oregon, abutting the Columbia River and Pacific Ocean, Astoria is a charming seaside city with inspiring surroundings. WikiMatrix WikiMatrix. Kansas KS. Many foreigners like to go sightseeing in Los Angeles. Opened in , the museum is located on the University of Oregon campus, where other attractions include the Museum of Natural and Cultural History and a historic track at Hayward Field. This major river leads inland, paralleled by the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area with many fun things to do, including waterfall hikes and windsurfing or kiteboarding in Hood River. The state's largest city, Portland, has an international reputation for drawing tourists with an offbeat and welcoming culture. Keltic Star 12 reviews. The confusion between these two words is an extension of the confusion between site and sight.
  • Strategic Conservation Management in Oregon's Willamette Valley

    Strategic Conservation Management in Oregon's Willamette Valley

    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Strategic Conservation Management in Oregon’s Willamette Valley Surrogate Species Pilot 1.0 The Power of Partnership The Willamette Valley is the fastest growing and most densely populated eco-region in Oregon. Strong public and private partnerships are crucial to meet long-term conservation goals. Numerous partners are engaged in active research, conservation, and monitoring programs to improve the status of priority habitats and species in the Valley. These partnerships, the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife’s Oregon Conservation Strategy, and The Nature Conservancy’s Willamette Basin Synthesis Project, provided the foundation for our Strategic Habitat Conservation approach in the Willamette Valley. We thank the partners that have contributed their valuable time and expertise to this effort. We also thank our other partners who are providing important research, conservation, and monitoring expertise in the Valley. Together, our partnerships can enable a level of conservation no single agency, organization, or individual can accomplish alone. White-breasted nuthatch ©Robert Gilbert TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments.....i Executive Summary.....1 Introduction.....2 Meta-Review Approach.....3 Surrogate Species Selection.....6 Willamette Valley Strategy Habitats and Surrogate Species.....7 Biological Objectives and Priority Actions For Surrogate Species.....28 Summary.....28 References.....34 Appendix A. Types of surrogate species (adapted from Caro 2010)......39 REVIEW COPY © Metro ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Authors: Jodie Delavan, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Dolores Weisbaum, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Strategic Conservation Management Team Dan Bell, The Nature Conservancy Rebecca Currin, Oregon Department of Agriculture Lori Hennings, Metro Paul Henson, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Esther Lev, The Wetlands Conservancy Holly Michael, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Damien Miller, U.S.