DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix 1 Case Studies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix 1 Case Studies www.pwc.com 15 February 2011 Appendix 1 Case Studies Report Phase 2 February 2011 15 February 2011 1.1 Introduction.............................................................................................................................6 1.2 Italy - TAV (Treno Alta Velocità) SpA .................................................................................... 7 1.2.1 Project outline...................................................................................................................... 7 1.2.2 Packaging of the project ...................................................................................................... 7 1.2.3 Phasing of the project.......................................................................................................... 7 1.2.4 Organisation.........................................................................................................................8 1.2.5 Key challenges......................................................................................................................9 1.2.6 Key stakeholders..................................................................................................................9 1.2.7 Funding and financing ........................................................................................................9 1.2.8 Cost and budget ...................................................................................................................9 1.2.9 Key contractual features....................................................................................................10 1.2.10 Procurement strategy ....................................................................................................10 1.2.11 Risks ...............................................................................................................................10 1.2.12 Lessons learned..............................................................................................................10 1.2.13 Sources ...........................................................................................................................10 1.3 South-Africa – Gautrain.........................................................................................................11 1.3.1 Project outline.....................................................................................................................11 1.3.2 Packaging of the project .....................................................................................................11 1.3.3 Phasing of the project.........................................................................................................11 1.3.4 Organisation........................................................................................................................11 1.3.5 Key challenges.................................................................................................................... 12 1.3.6 Key stakeholders................................................................................................................ 12 1.3.7 Funding and financing ...................................................................................................... 13 1.3.8 Cost and budget ................................................................................................................. 13 1.3.9 Key contractual features.................................................................................................... 13 1.3.10 Procurement strategy .................................................................................................... 13 1.3.11 Risks ............................................................................................................................... 13 1.3.12 Lessons learned.............................................................................................................. 13 1.3.13 Sources ........................................................................................................................... 14 1.4 Sweden – HSR Feasibility Study .......................................................................................... 15 1.4.1 Project outline.................................................................................................................... 15 1.4.2 Packaging of the project .................................................................................................... 15 1.4.3 Phasing of the project........................................................................................................ 15 1.4.4 Organisation....................................................................................................................... 16 1.4.5 Key challenges.................................................................................................................... 17 1.4.6 Key stakeholders................................................................................................................ 17 1.4.7 Funding and financing ...................................................................................................... 17 1.4.8 Total cost and budget ........................................................................................................ 18 1.4.9 Key contractual features.................................................................................................... 18 1.4.10 Procurement strategy .................................................................................................... 19 1.4.11 Risks ............................................................................................................................... 19 1.4.12 Lessons learned.............................................................................................................. 19 1.4.13 Sources ........................................................................................................................... 19 1.5 Netherlands (HSL Zuid)........................................................................................................20 1.5.1 Project outline....................................................................................................................20 1.5.2 Packaging of the project ....................................................................................................20 1.5.3 Phasing of the project........................................................................................................20 1.5.4 Organisation.......................................................................................................................20 1.5.5 Key Challenges...................................................................................................................20 1.5.6 Key stakeholders................................................................................................................20 1.5.7 Funding and financing ...................................................................................................... 21 1.5.8 Cost and budget ................................................................................................................. 21 1.5.9 Risks ................................................................................................................................... 21 1.5.10 Lessons learned.............................................................................................................. 21 1.5.11 Sources ...........................................................................................................................22 1.6 Japan – Tohoku Shinkansen.................................................................................................23 2 15 February 2011 1.6.1 Project outline....................................................................................................................23 1.6.2 Packaging of the project ....................................................................................................23 1.6.3 Phasing of the project........................................................................................................23 1.6.4 Organisation.......................................................................................................................23 1.6.5 Key challenges....................................................................................................................24 1.6.6 Key stakeholders................................................................................................................24 1.6.7 Funding and financing. .....................................................................................................24 1.6.8 Cost and budget .................................................................................................................24 1.6.9 Key contractual features....................................................................................................24 1.6.10 Procurement strategy ....................................................................................................25 1.6.11 Risks ...............................................................................................................................25 1.6.12 Lessons learned..............................................................................................................25 1.6.13 Sources ...........................................................................................................................25 1.7 France (TGV)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mezinárodní Komparace Vysokorychlostních Tratí
    Masarykova univerzita Ekonomicko-správní fakulta Studijní obor: Hospodářská politika MEZINÁRODNÍ KOMPARACE VYSOKORYCHLOSTNÍCH TRATÍ International comparison of high-speed rails Diplomová práce Vedoucí diplomové práce: Autor: doc. Ing. Martin Kvizda, Ph.D. Bc. Barbora KUKLOVÁ Brno, 2018 MASARYKOVA UNIVERZITA Ekonomicko-správní fakulta ZADÁNÍ DIPLOMOVÉ PRÁCE Akademický rok: 2017/2018 Studentka: Bc. Barbora Kuklová Obor: Hospodářská politika Název práce: Mezinárodní komparace vysokorychlostích tratí Název práce anglicky: International comparison of high-speed rails Cíl práce, postup a použité metody: Cíl práce: Cílem práce je komparace systémů vysokorychlostní železniční dopravy ve vybra- ných zemích, následné určení, který z modelů se nejvíce blíží zamýšlené vysoko- rychlostní dopravě v České republice, a ze srovnání plynoucí soupis doporučení pro ČR. Pracovní postup: Předmětem práce bude vymezení, kategorizace a rozčlenění vysokorychlostních tratí dle jednotlivých zemí, ze kterých budou dle zadaných kritérií vybrány ty státy, kde model vysokorychlostních tratí alespoň částečně odpovídá zamýšlenému sys- tému v ČR. Následovat bude vlastní komparace vysokorychlostních tratí v těchto vybraných státech a aplikace na český dopravní systém. Struktura práce: 1. Úvod 2. Kategorizace a členění vysokorychlostních tratí a stanovení hodnotících kritérií 3. Výběr relevantních zemí 4. Komparace systémů ve vybraných zemích 5. Vyhodnocení výsledků a aplikace na Českou republiku 6. Závěr Rozsah grafických prací: Podle pokynů vedoucího práce Rozsah práce bez příloh: 60 – 80 stran Literatura: A handbook of transport economics / edited by André de Palma ... [et al.]. Edited by André De Palma. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2011. xviii, 904. ISBN 9781847202031. Analytical studies in transport economics. Edited by Andrew F. Daughety. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985. ix, 253. ISBN 9780521268103.
    [Show full text]
  • Signalling on the High-Speed Railway Amsterdam–Antwerp
    Computers in Railways XI 243 Towards interoperability on Northwest European railway corridors: signalling on the high-speed railway Amsterdam–Antwerp J. H. Baggen, J. M. Vleugel & J. A. A. M. Stoop Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands Abstract The high-speed railway Amsterdam (The Netherlands)–Antwerp (Belgium) is nearly completed. As part of a TEN-T priority project it will connect to major metropolitan areas in Northwest Europe. In many (European) countries, high-speed railways have been built. So, at first sight, the development of this particular high-speed railway should be relatively straightforward. But the situation seems to be more complicated. To run international services full interoperability is required. However, there turned out to be compatibility problems that are mainly caused by the way decision making has taken place, in particular with respect to the choice and implementation of ERTMS, the new European railway signalling system. In this paper major technical and institutional choices, as well as the choice of system borders that have all been made by decision makers involved in the development of the high-speed railway Amsterdam–Antwerp, will be analyzed. This will make it possible to draw some lessons that might be used for future railway projects in Europe and other parts of the world. Keywords: high-speed railway, interoperability, signalling, metropolitan areas. 1 Introduction Two major new railway projects were initiated in the past decade in The Netherlands, the Betuweroute dedicated freight railway between Rotterdam seaport and the Dutch-German border and the high-speed railway between Amsterdam Airport Schiphol and the Dutch-Belgian border to Antwerp (Belgium).
    [Show full text]
  • 1/2012 3 Svakheter Ved Stillesby-Utredningen
    FORJERNBANE Bli medlem! www.jernbane.no Foreløpig pris 13 milliarder – Innmeldt til Riksrevisjonen s. 10 – Anbefaler grønn vekst s. 6 www.jernbane.no FORJERNBANE Foreløpig pris 13 milliarder RIK ONSRUD slag for Eidsvoll st.-Sørli langs Vorma/Mjøsa har økt med t til 11,5 mrd. Enkeltsporstrekningen på Gardermobanen, er anslått til 1,5 mrd. uten at det gjøres noe med den dår- n eksterne KS2 rapporten regner det ikke som usannsyn- n få påplussinger. Rundt årsskiftet kom det fram at Jern- selsdepartementet holdt tilbake en alternativanalyse datert t en Østlig trasé Venjar-Sørli var så å si like god som en Østlandet er åpenbart et viktig prosjekt på vei mot et nytt nett. Men Norge er mer enn Østlandet. En 1. jernbane- omfatte Jærbanen, Vossebanen og Trønderbanen. Finan- ss og bør baseres på et bredt politisk forlik. Større statlige ygging bør også inngå. akke 2? øyhastighetsutredning har gitt ny kunnskap, men reiser . ommet fram til forholdsvis høye kostnader og klimagass- en. Dette skyldes i stor grad høy tunnelandel og at det er ig helstøping av tunnelene, noe som avviker Jernbanever- Det er også lagt til grunn doble tunnelløp overalt. For de som det også vil bli en del av, er det kanskje ikke nødven- måten i nasjonal transportplan for klimaeffekten gir langt nn det som ble brukt i Høyhastighetsutredningen. Klima- afikk i høyere luftlag er heller ikke tatt hensyn til, og det syn til sparte kostnader ved at tog overtar for fly, bil, buss. net med kostnader ved bygging av flere av stasjonene, men de billettinntekter. et har lagt til grunn to alternativer; 250 og 330 km/t.
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome to Indra Navia As in Norway
    Page 1 February 2018 Contents 1. FLYTOGET, THE AIRPORT EXPRESS TRAIN................................................................................................................................... 1 2. RUTER – PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION IN OSLO AND AKERSHUS ................................................................................................... 2 3. GETTING THE TRAIN TO ASKER................................................................................................................................................... 4 4. HOTEL IN ASKER ......................................................................................................................................................................... 7 5. EATING PLACES IN ASKER ........................................................................................................................................................... 9 6. TAXI ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 10 7. OSLO VISITOR CENTRE - OFFICIAL TOURIST INFORMATION CENTRE FOR OSLO ........................................................................ 10 8. HOTEL IN OSLO ........................................................................................................................................................................ 11 WELCOME TO INDRA NAVIA AS IN NORWAY 1. Flytoget, the Airport Express Train The Oslo Airport Express Train (Flytoget)
    [Show full text]
  • Eighth Annual Market Monitoring Working Document March 2020
    Eighth Annual Market Monitoring Working Document March 2020 List of contents List of country abbreviations and regulatory bodies .................................................. 6 List of figures ............................................................................................................ 7 1. Introduction .............................................................................................. 9 2. Network characteristics of the railway market ........................................ 11 2.1. Total route length ..................................................................................................... 12 2.2. Electrified route length ............................................................................................. 12 2.3. High-speed route length ........................................................................................... 13 2.4. Main infrastructure manager’s share of route length .............................................. 14 2.5. Network usage intensity ........................................................................................... 15 3. Track access charges paid by railway undertakings for the Minimum Access Package .................................................................................................. 17 4. Railway undertakings and global rail traffic ............................................. 23 4.1. Railway undertakings ................................................................................................ 24 4.2. Total rail traffic .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nasjona Signalplan 2020
    National Signalling Plan 2020 1 LIST OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY ................................................................................................. 3 1.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 3 1.2 SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................... 5 2 NATIONAL SIGNALLING PLAN ..................................................................................................... 6 2.1 GRAPHIC OVERVIEW – YEAR OF COMMISSIONING ........................................................................... 6 2.2 GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION IN MAP .............................................................................................. 6 3 DESCRIPTION PER LINE SECTION .............................................................................................. 8 4 DOCUMENT INFORMATION .......................................................................................................... 9 4.1 TERMINOLOGY ............................................................................................................................ 9 4.2 REFERENCES .............................................................................................................................. 9 A significant proportion of the signalling systems on the Norwegian railway network are nearing the end of their life expectancy. This is an overall plan for the
    [Show full text]
  • Platform of Rail Infrastructure Managers in Europe
    P R I M E Platform of Rail Infrastructure Managers in Europe General Presentation November 2019 1 Main features . Acts as the European Network of Infrastructure Managers as established by the 4th Railway Package to: . develop Union rail infrastructure . support the timely and efficient implementation of the single European railway area . exchange best practices . monitor and benchmark performance and contribute to the market monitoring . tackle cross-border bottlenecks . discuss application of charging systems and the allocation of capacity on more than one network Added value . ‘Influencing’ function: industry able to affect draft legislation . ‘Early warning’ function: EC/ERA and industry - interaction and mutual understanding of respective ‘business’ . ‘Stress-test’ function: EC to test legislative proposals re their ‘implementability‘ . ‘Learning’ function: EC and IM to improve ‘Business’ function: Benchmarking of best practice to enhance IMs effectiveness and capabilities 2 The Evolution of PRIME – timeline Today September October March 2014 June 2016 The European Network of Rail IMs 2013 2013 First 8 IMs to EC proposes 26 participants, 40 members, 5 observers sign the 7 participants Declaration of 5 subgroups, 6 subgroups, Declaration of 2 subgroups: Intent to all IMs cooperation with 2 cooperation platforms Intent KPIs and benchmarking to set up PRIME regulators ad hoc working groups Implementing Acts ad hoc security group, PRIME PRIME PRIME 3 Members As of 20 December 2018: EU Industry Members Industry observers 20. Lietuvos geležinkeliai, LT European Commission 1. Adif, ES 1. CER (member) 2. Bane NOR, NO 21. LISEA, FR 2. EIM 3. Banedanmark, DK 22. MÁV Zrt , HU 3. RNE ERA (observer) 4.
    [Show full text]
  • MEDIA PLANNER 2019 Irjinternational Railway Journal
    MEDIA PLANNER 2019 IRJInternational Railway Journal YOUR GLOBAL MEDIA PARTNER MEDIA PLANNER 2019 THE IRJ BRAND IRJ The global source of railway news THE IRJ BRAND Since its launch in 1960 as the world’s first truly global railway trade publication, International Railway Journal (IRJ) has set the bar for news coverage, analysis and in-depth reports on the latest technologies and trends to keep railway managers, engineers, and suppliers around the world up-to-date with developments in the global rail industry. HIGHLY RESPECTED EDITORIAL TEAM IRJ’s highly respected and knowledgeable team of journalists, regional editors and correspondents travel the world to produce in-depth and insightful reports on the latest railway and transit projects. IRJ sets a high standard for impartial reporting and bold design, while its easy-to-navigate website consistently carries a high-volume of quality news articles, making it a leading online news destination for the rail industry. EXTENSIVE GLOBAL REACH IRJ’s standing in the market is reflected in its extremely loyal readership and steadily-growing website traffic. According to our latest ABC audit1, 84% of IRJ’s total circulation of 10,324 railway professionals is requested compared with just 20.6%2 for our nearest competitors. IRJ’s growing global reach encompasses our monthly print magazine, interactive digital edition, news-leading website, daily and weekly newsletters, social media, webinars, and conferences. YOUR MEDIA PARTNER IRJ is one of the few constants in a rapidly-changing world, with new markets emerging, organisations restructuring, suppliers merging, and the continuous evolution of digital technologies. IRJ is your ideal partner to help your business grow and prosper.
    [Show full text]
  • Upcoming Projects Infrastructure Construction Division About Bane NOR Bane NOR Is a State-Owned Company Respon- Sible for the National Railway Infrastructure
    1 Upcoming projects Infrastructure Construction Division About Bane NOR Bane NOR is a state-owned company respon- sible for the national railway infrastructure. Our mission is to ensure accessible railway infra- structure and efficient and user-friendly ser- vices, including the development of hubs and goods terminals. The company’s main responsible are: • Planning, development, administration, operation and maintenance of the national railway network • Traffic management • Administration and development of railway property Bane NOR has approximately 4,500 employees and the head office is based in Oslo, Norway. All plans and figures in this folder are preliminary and may be subject for change. 3 Never has more money been invested in Norwegian railway infrastructure. The InterCity rollout as described in this folder consists of several projects. These investments create great value for all travelers. In the coming years, departures will be more frequent, with reduced travel time within the InterCity operating area. We are living in an exciting and changing infrastructure environment, with a high activity level. Over the next three years Bane NOR plans to introduce contracts relating to a large number of mega projects to the market. Investment will continue until the InterCity rollout is completed as planned in 2034. Additionally, Bane NOR plans together with The Norwegian Public Roads Administration, to build a safer and faster rail and road system between Arna and Stanghelle on the Bergen Line (western part of Norway). We rely on close
    [Show full text]
  • List of Numeric Codes for Railway Companies (RICS Code) Contact : [email protected] Reference : Code Short
    List of numeric codes for railway companies (RICS Code) contact : [email protected] reference : http://www.uic.org/rics code short name full name country request date allocation date modified date of begin validity of end validity recent Freight Passenger Infra- structure Holding Integrated Other url 0006 StL Holland Stena Line Holland BV NL 01/07/2004 01/07/2004 x http://www.stenaline.nl/ferry/ 0010 VR VR-Yhtymä Oy FI 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x http://www.vr.fi/ 0012 TRFSA Transfesa ES 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 04/10/2016 x http://www.transfesa.com/ 0013 OSJD OSJD PL 12/07/2000 12/07/2000 x http://osjd.org/ 0014 CWL Compagnie des Wagons-Lits FR 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x http://www.cwl-services.com/ 0015 RMF Rail Manche Finance GB 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x http://www.rmf.co.uk/ 0016 RD RAILDATA CH 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x http://www.raildata.coop/ 0017 ENS European Night Services Ltd GB 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x 0018 THI Factory THI Factory SA BE 06/05/2005 06/05/2005 01/12/2014 x http://www.thalys.com/ 0019 Eurostar I Eurostar International Limited GB 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x http://www.eurostar.com/ 0020 OAO RZD Joint Stock Company 'Russian Railways' RU 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x http://rzd.ru/ 0021 BC Belarusian Railways BY 11/09/2003 24/11/2004 x http://www.rw.by/ 0022 UZ Ukrainski Zaliznytsi UA 15/01/2004 15/01/2004 x http://uz.gov.ua/ 0023 CFM Calea Ferată din Moldova MD 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x http://railway.md/ 0024 LG AB 'Lietuvos geležinkeliai' LT 28/09/2004 24/11/2004 x http://www.litrail.lt/ 0025 LDZ Latvijas dzelzceļš LV 19/10/2004 24/11/2004 x http://www.ldz.lv/ 0026 EVR Aktsiaselts Eesti Raudtee EE 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x http://www.evr.ee/ 0027 KTZ Kazakhstan Temir Zholy KZ 17/05/2004 17/05/2004 x http://www.railway.ge/ 0028 GR Sakartvelos Rkinigza GE 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x http://railway.ge/ 0029 UTI Uzbekistan Temir Yullari UZ 17/05/2004 17/05/2004 x http://www.uzrailway.uz/ 0030 ZC Railways of D.P.R.K.
    [Show full text]
  • HS1 Escrow Arrangements
    Final Report July 2018 HS1 Escrow Arrangements Office of Rail and Road Our ref: 23336101 Final Report July 2018 HS1 Escrow Arrangements Prepared by: Prepared for: Steer Office of Rail and Road 28-32 Upper Ground One Kemble Street London SE1 9PD London WC2B 4AN +44 20 7910 5000 www.steergroup.com Our ref: 23336101 Steer has prepared this material for Office of Rail and Road. This material may only be used within the context and scope for which Steer has prepared it and may not be relied upon in part or whole by any third party or be used for any other purpose. Any person choosing to use any part of this material without the express and written permission of Steer shall be deemed to confirm their agreement to indemnify Steer for all loss or damage resulting therefrom. Steer has prepared this material using professional practices and procedures using information available to it at the time and as such any new information could alter the validity of the results and conclusions made. HS1 Escrow Arrangements | Final Report Contents 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 1 Purpose of the Study .......................................................................................................... 1 Our approach ...................................................................................................................... 1 2 Background ............................................................................................................... 2
    [Show full text]
  • A System Solution to Optimize the Maintenance Process
    A System Solution to Optimize The Maintenance Process © 2012 ERDMANN-Softwaregesellschaft mbH Introduction - 2 IRISSYS® (International Railway Inspection and Services System) 1 Introduction ................................................................................................ 1 1.1 The Process of Maintenance ....................................................................... 1 1.2 The Task .............................................................................................. 1 1.3 The Solution .......................................................................................... 3 1.4 Your Partner .......................................................................................... 3 2 Advantages at a Glance .................................................................................. 4 3 IRISSYS® - Solutions ..................................................................................... 6 3.1 Inspection Data Management ...................................................................... 6 3.2 Analysis ............................................................................................... 9 3.3 Maintenance and Repair ........................................................................... 14 3.4 Fast Portability to Different Route Networks .................................................. 19 4 IRISSYS® - Software .................................................................................... 21 4.1 Systems Architecture .............................................................................
    [Show full text]