DOCSLIB.ORG

EA for Aleutians 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EA for Aleutians 2020 Draft Environmental Assessment of a Marine Geophysical Survey by R/V Marcus G. Langseth of the Aleutian Arc, September–October 2020 Prepared for Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory 61 Route 9W, P.O. Box 1000 Palisades, NY 10964-8000 and National Science Foundation Division of Ocean Sciences 4201 Wilson Blvd., Suite 725 Arlington, VA 22230 by LGL Ltd., environmental research associates 22 Fisher St., POB 280 King City, Ont. L7B 1A6 Submitted 27 March 2020 Revised 23 June 2020 LGL Report FA0202-01 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................... v List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................... vi Abstract ....................................................................................................................................................... vii List of Acronyms ......................................................................................................................................... ix I Purpose and Need ...................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Mission of NSF ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Purpose of and Need for the Proposed Action ................................................................................. 1 1.3 Background of NSF-funded Marine Seismic Research ................................................................... 2 1.4 Regulatory Setting ........................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Proposed Action ............................................................................................................................... 2 2.1.1 Project Objectives and Context ........................................................................................... 2 2.1.2 Proposed Activities ............................................................................................................. 4 2.1.3 Monitoring and Mitigation Measures ................................................................................. 6 2.2 Alternative 1: No Action Alternative ............................................................................................... 9 2.3 Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Further Analysis ...................................................... 9 2.3.1 Alternative E1: Alternative Location .................................................................................. 9 2.3.2 Alternative E2: Use of Alternative Technologies ............................................................... 9 III Affected Environment ........................................................................................................................... 11 3.1 Oceanography ................................................................................................................................ 12 3.2 Protected Areas .............................................................................................................................. 13 3.2.1 Critical Habitat for ESA-listed Species ................................................................................ 13 3.2.2 Other Protected Areas ........................................................................................................... 14 3.3 Marine Mammals ........................................................................................................................... 15 3.3.1 Mysticetes ......................................................................................................................... 15 3.3.2 Odontocetes ...................................................................................................................... 25 3.3.3 Pinnipeds ........................................................................................................................... 30 3.3.4 Marine Fissiped ................................................................................................................. 34 3.4 Sea Turtles ..................................................................................................................................... 35 3.4.1 Leatherback Turtle ............................................................................................................ 35 3.5 Seabirds .......................................................................................................................................... 36 3.5.1 Short-tailed Albatross ....................................................................................................... 36 3.5.2 Steller’s Eider ................................................................................................................... 37 3.5.3 Spectacled Eider ............................................................................................................... 38 3.6 Corals ............................................................................................................................................. 38 3.7 Fish, Essential Fish Habitat, and Habitat Areas of Particular Concern ......................................... 39 3.7.1 ESA-Listed Fish Species .................................................................................................. 39 3.7.2 Important Fish Resources ................................................................................................. 39 3.7.3 Essential Fish Habitat ....................................................................................................... 41 3.7.4 Habitat Areas of Particular Concern ................................................................................. 42 3.8 Fisheries ......................................................................................................................................... 42 3.8.1 Commercial Fisheries ....................................................................................................... 42 Draft Environmental Assessment for L-DEO Aleutians, 2020 Page iii Table of Contents 3.8.2 Recreational Fisheries ....................................................................................................... 46 3.9 SCUBA Dive Sites and Shipwrecks .............................................................................................. 47 IV Environmental Consequences ............................................................................................................... 47 4.1 Proposed Action ............................................................................................................................. 47 4.1.1 Direct Effects on Marine Mammals and Sea Turtles and Their Significance ................... 47 4.1.2 Direct Effects on Marine Invertebrates, Fish, and Fisheries, EFH, and Their Significance ...................................................................................................................... 70 4.1.3 Direct Effects on Seabirds and Their Significance ........................................................... 78 4.1.4 Indirect Effects on Marine Mammals, Sea Turtles, Seabirds, and Fish and Their Significance ...................................................................................................................... 78 4.1.5 Possible Effects on Subsistence Hunting and Fishing ...................................................... 79 4.1.6 Direct Effects on Cultural Resources and Their Significance .......................................... 80 4.1.8 Cumulative Effects ........................................................................................................... 81 4.1.9 Unavoidable Impacts ........................................................................................................ 84 4.1.10 Coordination with Other Agencies and Processes ............................................................ 85 4.2 No Action Alternative .................................................................................................................... 85 V List of Preparers ..................................................................................................................................... 86 VI Literature Cited ..................................................................................................................................... 87 List of Appendices .................................................................................................................................... 134 Appendix A: Determination of Mitigation Zones .................................................................................... A-1 Appendix B: Marine Mammal Densities ................................................................................................. B-1 Appendix C: Marine Mammal Take Calculations ................................................................................... C-1 Appendix D: Ensonified Areas for Marine Mammal Take Calculations ................................................. D-1 Draft Environmental Assessment for L-DEO Aleutians, 2020 Page iv List of Figures LIST OF FIGURES Page FIGURE 1. Map of the proposed 2020 seismic survey of the Aleutian Arc showing representative survey lines and marine
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Results of the March 2018 Acoustic-Trawl Survey of Walleye
    Alaska Fisheries Science Center National Marine Fisheries Service U.S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AFSC PROCESSED REPORT 2018-07 Results of the March 2018 Acoustic-Trawl Survey of Walleye Pollock (Gadus chalcogrammus) Conducted in the Southeastern Aleutian Basin Near Bogoslof Island, Cruise DY2018-02 December 2018 This report does not constitute a publication and is for information only. All data herein are to be considered provisional. This document should be cited as follows: McKelvey, D., and M. Levine. 2018. Results of the March 2018 acoustic-trawl surve y of walleye pollock (Gadus chalcogrammus) conducted in the Southeastern Aleutian Basin near Bogoslof Island, Cruise DY2018-027. AFSC Processed Rep. 2018-07, 44 p. Alaska Fish. Sci. Cent., NOAA, Natl. Mar. Fish. Serv., 7600 Sand Point Way NE, Seattl e WA 98115. Available at http://www.afsc.noaa.gov/Publications/ProcRpt/PR2018-07.pdf. Reference in this document to trade names does not imply endorsement by the National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA. Results of the March 2018 Acoustic-Trawl Survey of Walleye Pollock (Gadus chalcogrammus) Conducted in the Southeastern Aleutian Basin Near Bogoslof Island, Cruise DY2018-02 by D. McKelvey and M. Levine December 2018 THIS INFORMATION IS DISTRIBUTED SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF PRE- DISSEMINATION PEER REVIEW UNDER APPLICABLE INFORMATION QUALITY GUIDELINES. IT HAS NOT BEEN FORMALLY DISSEMINATED BY NOAA FISHERIES/ALASKA FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER AND SHOULD NOT BE CONSTRUED TO REPRESENT ANY AGENCY DETERMINATION OR POLICY ABSTRACT Scientists from the Alaska Fisheries Science Center conducted an acoustic-trawl survey in early March 2018 to estimate the abundance of pre-spawning walleye pollock (Gadus chalcogrammus) in the southeastern Aleutian Basin near Bogoslof Island.
    [Show full text]
  • Breaking with Tradition: Redefining Measures for Diet Description with a Case Study of the Aleutian Skate Bathyraja Aleutica (Gilbert 1896)
    Environ Biol Fish (2012) 95:3–20 DOI 10.1007/s10641-011-9959-z Breaking with tradition: redefining measures for diet description with a case study of the Aleutian skate Bathyraja aleutica (Gilbert 1896) Simon C. Brown & Joseph J. Bizzarro & Gregor M. Cailliet & David A. Ebert Received: 1 September 2010 /Accepted: 27 October 2011 /Published online: 16 November 2011 # Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011 Abstract Characterization of fish diets from stomach Aleutian skate Bathyraja aleutica from specimens content analysis commonly involves the calculation of collected from three ecoregions of the northern Gulf multiple relative measures of prey quantity (%N,%W,% of Alaska (GOA) continental shelf during June- FO), and their combination in the standardized Index of September 2005–2007. Aleutian skate were found to Relative Importance (%IRI). Examining the underlying primarily consume the commonly abundant benthic structure of dietary data matrices reveals interdependen- crustaceans, northern pink shrimp Pandalus eous and cies among diet measures, and obviates the advantageous Tanner crab Chionoecetes bairdi, and secondarily use of underused prey-specific measures to diet charac- consume various teleost fishes. Multivariate variance terization. With these interdependencies clearly realized partitioning by Redundancy Analysis revealed spa- as formal mathematical expressions, we proceed to tially driven differences in the diet to be as influential isolate algebraically, the inherent bias in %IRI, and as skate size, sex, and depth of capture. Euphausiids provide a correction for it by substituting traditional and other mid-water prey in the diet were strongly measures with prey-specific measures. The resultant new associated with the Shelikof Strait region during 2007 index, the Prey-Specific Index of Relative Importance (% that may be explained by atypical marine climate PSIRI), is introduced and recommended to replace %IRI conditions during that year.
    [Show full text]
  • Oversight and Reauthorization Hearing on the Rehabilitation Act of 1983
    DOCUMEIIT RESUME ED 249 748 EC 170 860 TITLE Ove- ght and Reauthorization Hearing on the Rehabilitation Act of 1983. Bearings before the Subcot 'Nitta. on Select Education of the Committee on Education and Labor. Rouse of Representatives, Ninety -- Eighth Congress, First Session Narch 21 and 23, 1983). INSTITUTION Congress of the U.S., Washington, D.C.Rouse Commettee on Education and Labor. PUB DATE 84; NOTE ' FUR TYPE 4114*I 1/Legislative/Regulatory Materials (090) EDRS PRICE NFO1 /FC18 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Compliance (Legal); Disabilities; *Federal Legislation; Federal Programs; Bearings; Rehabilitation; *Vocational Rehabilitation 'IDENTIFIERS *Rehabilitation Act 1973 ABSTRACT Excerpts are presented from the March 1983 hearings on oversight and reauthorization of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. Prepared statements are included from federal officials; representatives of professional rehabilitation and education associations and state and local agencies; etudents; and other interested persons. In addition to the statements, letters and supplemental materials on the topic are also, provided from associations, agencies, university faculty, and federal officials. The statements touch on amendisents to the act, provisions for independent living, rehabilitation research, and rehabilitation training. (CL) *********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRA are the best that can be made from the original document. ***********************************************************************
    [Show full text]
  • Adak Army Base and Adak Naval Operating Base and Or Common Adak Naval Station (Naval Air Station Adak) 2
    N?S Ferm 10-900 OMB Mo. 1024-0018 (342) NHL - WWM, PACIFIC Eip. 10-31-84 Uncled States Department off the Interior National Park Service For NPS UM only National Register off Historic Places received Inventory Nomination Form date entered See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries complete applicable sections ' _______ 1. Name__________________ historic Adak Army Base and Adak Naval Operating Base and or common Adak Naval Station (Naval Air Station Adak) 2. Location street & number not (or publication city, town vicinity of state Alaska code 02 county Aleutian Islands code 010 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use __ district X public __ occupied __ agriculture __ museum building(s) private __ unoccupied commercial park structure both work in progress educational private residence X site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment religious object in process X yes: restricted government __ scientific being considered .. yes: unrestricted industrial transportation __ no ,_X military __ other: 4. Owner off Property name United States Navy street & number Adak Naval Station, U.S. Department of the Navy city, town FPO Seattle vicinity of state Washington 98791 5. Location off Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. United States Navy street & number Adak Naval Station. U.S. Department of the Navy city, town FPO Seattle state Washington 98791 6. Representation in Existing Surveys y title None has this property been determined eligible? yes J^L no date federal _ _ state __ county local depository for survey records city, town state 7. Description Condition Check one Check one __ excellent __ deteriorated __ unaltered _K original site __ good X_ ruins _X altered __ moved date _.__._.
    [Show full text]
  • Growth of the Northern Fur Seal Colony on Bogoslof Island, Alaska THOMAS R
    ARCTIC VOL. 42, NO. 4 (DECEMBER 1989) P. 368-312 Growth of the Northern Fur Seal Colony on Bogoslof Island, Alaska THOMAS R. LOUGHLIN' and R.V. MILLER' (Received 14 March 1989; accepted in revised form 10 May 1989) ABSTRACT. Northern fur seal, Callorhinus ursinus, pups were first observed on Bogoslof Island, southeast Bering Sea, in 1980. By 1988 the population had grown at a rate of 57Vo.yr" to over 400 individuals, including 80+ pups, 159 adult females, 22 territorial males, and 188 subadult males. Some animals originated from rookeries of the CommanderIslands, whereas others are probably from thePribilof Islands. In 1983 and 1985 over 50% of the females were estimated to be > 6 years of age, based on vibrissae color. The rookery is in the same location where solitary male fur seals were seen in 1976 and 1979 and is adjacent to a large northern sea lion rookery. Key words: Bogoslof Island, northern fur seal, Callorhinus ursinus, northern sea lion, breeding colony RBSUMÉ. Des bébés otaries à fourrure, Callorhinus ursinus, ont été observés pour la premiere fois sur Bogoslof Island, au sud-est de la mer de Béring en 1980. En 1988, la population avait augmenté à un tauxde 57 %.an" et dépassait les 400 individus. Parmi eux, on comptait 80 bébés ou plus, 159 femelles adultes, 22 mâles possédant un territoire et 188 jeunes adultes mâles. Certains animaux venaient des colonies des îles du Commandeur, alors que d'autres venaient probablement des îles Pribilof. En 1983 et 1985, on a estimé que plus de 50 To des femelles avaient plus de 6 ans, en se fondant sur lacouleur de leurs vibrisses.
    [Show full text]
  • Ardea 94(3): 639–650
    Local movements, home ranges and body condition of Common Eiders Somateria mollissima wintering in Southwest Greenland Flemming R. Merkel1,2,*, Anders Mosbech2, Christian Sonne2, Annette Flagstad3, Knud Falk4 & Sarah E. Jamieson4 Merkel F.R., Mosbech A., Sonne C., Flagstad A., Falk K. & Jamieson S.E. 2006. Local movements, home ranges and body condition of Common Eiders Somateria mollissima wintering in Southwest Greenland. Ardea 94(3): 639–650. We examined local movements, home ranges and body condition of wintering Northern Common Eiders Somateria mollissima borealis in Southwest Greenland from late winter until spring migration in 2000 and 2001. At key marine habitats at coastal areas and in the inner fjord system of Nuuk, we implanted 33 Eiders with satellite transmitters and collected Eider carcasses for body condition analyses. Most Eiders exhib- ited strong site fidelity during the study period with a mean 95% home range size of 67.8 km2 and a mean core area (50%) of 8.1 km2. Diurnal movements peaked at dawn and dusk when birds presumably moved between feeding areas and roosting sites. Roosting occurred near day- time activity centres, on average 1.7 km apart. Among birds marked at coastal habitats only between 8% and 29% also used the inner fjord habitats, despite high levels of hunting at the coastal area. Birds that did move to the inner fjord system did not return to the coastal area. These findings accentuate the need for managing wintering Common Eiders in Southwest Greenland also at a local scale, taking site fidelity into account. The body condition of adult fjord birds was either equal or superior to that of coastal birds.
    [Show full text]
  • Aleutian Islands
    Journal of Global Change Data & Discovery. 2018, 2(1): 109-114 © 2018 GCdataPR DOI:10.3974/geodp.2018.01.18 Global Change Research Data Publishing & Repository www.geodoi.ac.cn Global Change Data Encyclopedia Aleutian Islands Liu, C.1* Yang, A. Q.2 Hu, W. Y.1 Liu, R. G.1 Shi, R. X.1 1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; 2. Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth，Chinese Academy of Sciences，Beijing100101，China Keywords: Aleutian Islands; Fox Islands; Four Mountains Islands; Andreanof Islands; Rat Islands; Near Islands; Kommandor Islands; Unimak Island; USA; Russia; data encyclopedia The Aleutian Islands extends latitude from 51°12′35″N to 55°22′14″N and longitude about 32 degrees from 165°45′10″E to 162°21′10″W, it is a chain volcanic islands belonging to both the United States and Russia[1–3] (Figure 1, 2). The islands are formed in the northern part of the Pacific Ring of Fire. They form part of the Aleutian Arc in the Northern Pacific Ocean, extending about 1,900 km westward from the Alaska Peninsula to- ward the Kamchatka Peninsula in Russia, Figure 1 Dataset of Aleutian Islands in .kmz format and mark a dividing line between the Ber- ing Sea to the north and the Pacific Ocean to the south. The islands comprise 6 groups of islands (east to west): the Fox Islands[4–5], islands of Four Mountains[6–7], Andreanof Islands[8–9], Rat Islands[10–11], Near Is- lands[12–13] and Kommandor Islands[14–15].
    [Show full text]
  • XIV. Appendices
    Appendix 1, Page 1 XIV. Appendices Appendix 1. Vertebrate Species of Alaska1 * Threatened/Endangered Fishes Scientific Name Common Name Eptatretus deani black hagfish Lampetra tridentata Pacific lamprey Lampetra camtschatica Arctic lamprey Lampetra alaskense Alaskan brook lamprey Lampetra ayresii river lamprey Lampetra richardsoni western brook lamprey Hydrolagus colliei spotted ratfish Prionace glauca blue shark Apristurus brunneus brown cat shark Lamna ditropis salmon shark Carcharodon carcharias white shark Cetorhinus maximus basking shark Hexanchus griseus bluntnose sixgill shark Somniosus pacificus Pacific sleeper shark Squalus acanthias spiny dogfish Raja binoculata big skate Raja rhina longnose skate Bathyraja parmifera Alaska skate Bathyraja aleutica Aleutian skate Bathyraja interrupta sandpaper skate Bathyraja lindbergi Commander skate Bathyraja abyssicola deepsea skate Bathyraja maculata whiteblotched skate Bathyraja minispinosa whitebrow skate Bathyraja trachura roughtail skate Bathyraja taranetzi mud skate Bathyraja violacea Okhotsk skate Acipenser medirostris green sturgeon Acipenser transmontanus white sturgeon Polyacanthonotus challengeri longnose tapirfish Synaphobranchus affinis slope cutthroat eel Histiobranchus bathybius deepwater cutthroat eel Avocettina infans blackline snipe eel Nemichthys scolopaceus slender snipe eel Alosa sapidissima American shad Clupea pallasii Pacific herring 1 This appendix lists the vertebrate species of Alaska, but it does not include subspecies, even though some of those are featured in the CWCS.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Alaskan Notes
    270 GABRIELSON,SomeAlaskan Notes L[Auk April SOME ALASKAN NOTES BY IRA N. GABRIELSON (Concluded[romp. 150) CALn*ORNIAMumu•, Uria aalgecali[ornica (Bryant).--This was prob- ably the mostabundant species observed on the trip. We did not see California Murres until we reachedSeward (June 10) where there was a large colony associatedwith the still more numerousPacific Kittiwakes.The deepwater at the baseof the cliff allowedus to drift the boat closeand in the clear depthswe could see the birds literally flyingunder the water as expertlyas fishes. Often they came to the surface,saw the boat, and instantly dived again. The great coloniesof the Semidisand Kagamil Island were the largest,composed largely or entirely of this species. In the former island group, wheneverwe approachedthe precipitouscliffs dosely enough to see distinctly,we found every available shelf and nook crowdedwith tourres. At Kagamil Island we traveledin the 'Brown Bear' for at least two miles along cliffs similarly occupied,and the water was covered with birds. These were two of the most impressiveof the bird coloniesseen on the trip. On BogoslofIsland an almostequally large concentra- tion of tourrescontained both this speciesand the next. PALLAS'SMumu•, Uria lornvia arra (Pallas).--Thisnorthern species was first found on BogoslofIsland (June 24). At St. GeorgeIsland (July 8) and St. Paul Island (July 4-6) Pallas's Murre was common,while at Walrus Island (July 7) the enormous murre colony was comprisedlargely, if not entirely, of this species. I saw only one bird there that I thought was a California Murre and it movedaway before I couldbe sure. Pallas'sMurre wasabundant also at St.
    [Show full text]
  • Boats Built at Toledo, Ohio Including Monroe, Michigan
    Boats Built at Toledo, Ohio Including Monroe, Michigan A Comprehensive Listing of the Vessels Built from Schooners to Steamers from 1810 to the Present Written and Compiled by: Matthew J. Weisman and Paula Shorf National Museum of the Great Lakes 1701 Front Street, Toledo, Ohio 43605 Welcome, The Great Lakes are not only the most important natural resource in the world, they represent thousands of years of history. The lakes have dramatically impacted the social, economic and political history of the North American continent. The National Museum of the Great Lakes tells the incredible story of our Great Lakes through over 300 genuine artifacts, a number of powerful audiovisual displays and 40 hands-on interactive exhibits including the Col. James M. Schoonmaker Museum Ship. The tales told here span hundreds of years, from the fur traders in the 1600s to the Underground Railroad operators in the 1800s, the rum runners in the 1900s, to the sailors on the thousand-footers sailing today. The theme of the Great Lakes as a Powerful Force runs through all of these stories and will create a lifelong interest in all who visit from 5 – 95 years old. Toledo and the surrounding area are full of early American History and great places to visit. The Battle of Fallen Timbers, the War of 1812, Fort Meigs and the early shipbuilding cities of Perrysburg and Maumee promise to please those who have an interest in local history. A visit to the world-class Toledo Art Museum, the fine dining along the river, with brew pubs and the world famous Tony Packo’s restaurant, will make for a great visit.
    [Show full text]
  • Observation and Modeling of Source Effects in Coda Wave Interferometry at Pavlof Volcano Matthew M
    Boise State University ScholarWorks Center for Geophysical Investigation of the Shallow CGISS Publications and Presentations Subsurface (CGISS) 5-1-2009 Observation and Modeling of Source Effects in Coda Wave Interferometry at Pavlof Volcano Matthew M. Haney Boise State University Kasper van Wijk Boise State University Leiph A. Preston Sandia National Laboratories David F. Aldridge Sandia National Laboratories This document was originally published by Society of Exploration Geophysicists in The Leading Edge. Copyright restrictions may apply. DOI: 10.1190/1.3124930 SPECIALSeismic SECTION: modeling S e i s m i c m o d e l i n g Observation and modeling of source effects in coda wave interferometry at Pavlof volcano MATTHEW M. HANEY, U.S. Geological Survey Alaska Volcano Observatory KASPER VAN WIJK, Boise State University LEIPH A. PRESTON and DAVID F. ALDRIDGE, Sandia National Laboratories orting out source and path eff ects for seismic waves Sat volcanoes is critical for the proper interpretation of underlying volcanic processes. Source or path eff ects imply that seismic waves interact strongly with the volcanic subsurface, either through partial resonance in a conduit (Garces et al., 2000; Sturton and Neuberg, 2006) or by random scattering in the heterogeneous volcanic edifi ce (Wegler and Luhr, 2001). As a result, both source and path eff ects can cause seismic waves to repeatedly sample parts of the volcano, leading to enhanced sensitivity to small changes in material properties at those locations. Th e challenge for volcano seismologists is to detect and reliably interpret these subtle changes for the purpose of monitoring eruptions. We examine seismic records of repeating explosions from Pavlof volcano, Alaska, during its 2007 eruption.
    [Show full text]
  • Grea3tfpermhl RESOURCES of the ALEUTIAN ARC
    GrEa3TFPERMhL RESOURCES OF THE ALEUTIAN ARC Wy Roman .I. Mntylcw, RlairB~yA. Lics, Chri~',Boph~r.I. WYC, and Mary A. Moomnsa GEOTHERMAL RESOURCES OF THE ALEUTIAN ARC By Roman J. Motyka, Shirley A. Liss, Christopher J. Nye, and Mary A. Moorman Roman Motyka sampling an upper Glacier Valley hot spring in the Makushin geothermal area. Photo by Shirley Liss. Professional Report 114 Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys Cover photo: "Old Faithful" of the Geyser Bight geothermal resource area. When- ever it has been observed (1870, 1948, 1980, and 1988),spring G8, Fairbanks, Alaska shown here at maximum activity, has had an eruption cycle of 1993 12 minutes. Photo by Shirley Liss. STATE OF ALASKA Walter J. Hickel, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Harry A. Noah, Commissioner DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL & GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS Thomas E. Smith, State Geologist Division of Geological & GeophysicalSurveys publications can be inspected at the following locations. Address mail orders to the Fairbanks office. Alaska Division of Geological University of Alaska Anchorage Library & Geophysical Surveys 321 1 Providence Drive 794 University Avenue, Suite 200 Anchorage, Alaska 99508 Fairbanks, Alaska 99709-3645 Elmer E. Rasmuson Library Alaska Resource Library University of Alaska Fairbanks 222 W. 7th Avenue Fairbanks, Alaska 99775-1005 Anchorage, Alaska 995 13-7589 Alaska State Library State Office Building, 8th moor 333 Willoughby Avenue Juneau, Alaska 9981 1-0571 This publication released by the Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, was
    [Show full text]