DOCSLIB.ORG

2021 Wyoming Game and Fish Department Hunting License

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2021 Wyoming Game and Fish Department Hunting License 2021 Wyoming Game and Fish Department Hunting License Application Information NEW FOR 2021 • Nonresident Moose and Bighorn Sheep Applicants – When submitting applications nonresident applicants will have to elect to be awarded a preference point if unsuccessful in the draw. • Voluntary Wildlife Crossing Donation – Wyoming statutes provide for a voluntary donation to be utilized for wildlife conservation efforts related to the transportation system in Wyoming. See page 20. • Voluntary Wildlife Damage Donation – Wyoming statutes provide for a voluntary donation to be utilized to fund predatory control activities in Wyoming. See page 20. For more information on hunting in Wyoming, please see the 2021 Wyoming Hunt Planner at https://wgfd.wyo.gov/hunting/hunt-planner. LEFTOVER LICENSES The Department conducts a leftover drawing for full and reduced price elk, deer and antelope limited quota licenses remaining after the initial limited quota drawing. • Application period for leftover elk, deer and antelope drawing – June 21 – June 25, 2021. • Tentative results of leftover drawing available – July 8, 2021 • Licenses remaining after the initial drawing and the leftover drawing go on sale on a first come, first served basis – July 12, 2021. APPLICATION DATES AND DEADLINES Online Applications The Department shall begin accepting applications at 8:00 a.m. on the specified date listed in the application deadline charts below. Online applications must be completed and submitted by midnight mountain time on the deadline date. Effective January 1, 2019 all applications, licenses and permits paid for with a credit card will incur a credit card processing fee. Fees must be paid in full by Visa, MasterCard or Discover when the application is submitted. Unsuccessful applicants will no longer receive refund warrants, but will instead have a credit applied back to the credit card that was used for the submission of the online application. To assist in the refund process, please ensure that the credit card used has an expiration date valid through the time period in which the drawing will be conducted. The Department will issue refund warrants in all circumstances when the credit card is no longer valid for processing a credit back to the credit card. Customers who need assistance submitting their applications online may go to a Department Regional Office or the Cheyenne Headquarters Office to use a computer at the kiosk station and receive personal assistance from Department personnel. 1 Resident Application Deadlines – online applications must be completed and submitted by midnight mountain time (MT) on the deadline date indicated below Online Application Dates Amount Modify/Withdraw Tentative Resident Applications Midnight MT to Remit (Doesn’t Deadline Date Results Available include processing fee) Elk–Full Price Elk Jan. 4 – June 1 June 1 June 17 $62* Youth Elk ** Jan. 4 – June 1 June 1 June 17 $30* Elk–Full Price Pioneer/Pioneer Heritage Pioneer/Pioneer Heritage Elk*** Jan. 4 – June 1 June 1 June 17 $10*/$40* Elk–Reduced Price Cow/Calf Elk Jan. 4 – June 1 June 1 June 17 $48* Cow/Calf Youth Elk ** Jan. 4 – June 1 June 1 June 17 $25* Elk–Reduced Price Pioneer/Pioneer Heritage Pioneer/Pioneer Heritage Cow/Calf Elk*** Jan. 4 – June 1 June 1 June 17 $10*/$32* Deer–Full Price Deer Jan. 4 – June 1 June 1 June 17 $47* Youth Deer ** Jan. 4 – June 1 June 1 June 17 $20* Deer–Full Price Pioneer/Pioneer Heritage Pioneer/Pioneer Heritage Deer*** Jan. 4 – June 1 June 1 June 17 $7*/$31* Deer–Reduced Price Doe/Fawn Deer Jan. 4 – June 1 June 1 June 17 $27* Doe/Fawn Youth Deer** Jan. 4 – June 1 June 1 June 17 $19* Deer–Reduced Price Pioneer/Pioneer Heritage Pioneer/Pioneer Heritage Doe/Fawn Deer*** Jan. 4 – June 1 June 1 June 17 $7*/$23* Antelope–Full Price Antelope Jan. 4 – June 1 June 1 June 17 $42* Youth Antelope** Jan. 4 – June 1 June 1 June 17 $20* Antelope–Full Price Pioneer/Pioneer Heritage Pioneer/Pioneer Heritage Antelope*** Jan. 4 – June 1 June 1 June 17 $7*/$27* Antelope–Reduced Price Doe/Fawn Antelope Jan. 4 – June 1 June 1 June 17 $27* Doe/Fawn Youth Antelope** Jan. 4 – June 1 June 1 June 17 $19* Antelope–Reduced Price Pioneer/Pioneer Heritage Pioneer/Pioneer Heritage Doe/Fawn Jan. 4 – June 1 June 1 June 17 $7*/$23* Antelope*** Moose** License Jan. 4 – Mar. 1 April 15 May 6 $157* Preference Point Only** July 1 – Nov. 1 N/A $7 Bighorn Sheep** License Jan. 4 – Mar. 1 April 15 May 6 $157* Preference Point Only** July 1 – Nov. 1 N/A $7 Bighorn Sheep–Reduced Price Ewe/Lamb Bighorn Sheep Jan. 4 – Mar. 1 April 15 May 6 $41* Ewe/Lamb Youth Bighorn Sheep** Jan. 4 – Mar. 1 April 15 May 6 $25* Mountain Goat** Jan. 4 – Mar. 1 April 15 May 6 $157* Wild Bison** Any Wild Bison Mar. 1 – Mar. 31 April 15 May 6 $419* Female or Calf Wild Bison Mar. 1 – Mar. 31 April 15 May 6 $265* Wild Turkey Spring Wild Turkey Jan. 4 – Feb. 1 Feb. 3 Feb. 18 $16 Pioneer/Pioneer Heritage Spring Wild Turkey*** Jan. 4 – Feb. 1 Feb. 3 Feb. 18 $2/$10 Fall Wild Turkey Apr. 1 – June 1 June 1 July 15 $16 Pioneer/Pioneer Heritage Fall Wild Turkey*** Apr. 1 – June 1 June 1 July 15 $2/$10 Continued on next page. 2 Online Application Dates Amount Modify/Withdraw Tentative Resident Applications Midnight MT to Remit (Doesn’t Deadline Date Results Available include processing fee) Pheasant Glendo Apr. 1 – June 1 NA Aug. 5 Free Springer Apr. 1 – June 1 NA Aug. 5 Free Sandhill Crane -Limited Quota Apr. 1 – June 1 NA July 15 Free Furbearing Animal - Limited Quota Furbearing Apr. 1 – June 1 NA July 15 Free Animal Trapping Permit Competitive Raffle Chances** Super Tag License July 15, 2020 – July 1, 2021 NA July 15 $10 Super Tag Trifecta License July 15, 2020 – July 1, 2021 NA July 15 $30 * A nonrefundable application fee of $5 for big game and wild bison is included in the amount to be remitted for each license applied for in the initial license drawing. ** See Page 15 for Minimum Age to Hunt Big and Trophy Game, Wild Bison, Youth Licenses or apply for Big Game Preference Points on Page 13 *** See page 15 for Pioneer and Pioneer Heritage Licenses 3 Nonresident Application Deadlines – online applications must be completed and submitted by midnight mountain time (MT) on the deadline date indicated below Online Application Dates Amount Modify/Withdraw Tentative to Remit (Doesn’t Nonresident Applications Midnight MT Deadline Date Results Available include processing fee) Elk–Full Price Elk and Fishing Jan. 4 – Feb. 1 May 10 May 20 $707* Youth Elk and Fishing** Jan. 4 – Feb. 1 May 10 May 20 $290* Special Elk and Fishing Jan. 4 – Feb. 1 May 10 May 20 $1,283* Preference Point Only July 1 – Nov. 1 N/A $52 Preference Point Only–Youth** July 1 – Nov. 1 N/A $10 Elk–Reduced Price Cow/Calf Elk Jan. 4 – Feb. 1 May 10 May 20 $303* Cow/Calf Youth Elk** Jan. 4 – Feb. 1 May 10 May 20 $115* Deer–Full Price Deer Jan. 4 – June 1 June 1 June 17 $389* Youth Deer** Jan. 4 – June 1 June 1 June 17 $125* Special Deer Jan. 4 – June 1 June 1 June 17 $677* Preference Point Only July 1 – Nov. 1 N/A $41 Preference Point Only –Youth** July 1 – Nov. 1 N/A $10 Deer–Reduced Price Doe/Fawn Deer Jan. 4 – June 1 June 1 June 17 $49* Doe/Fawn Youth Deer** Jan. 4 – June 1 June 1 June 17 $34* Antelope–Full Price Antelope Jan. 4 – June 1 June 1 June 17 $341* Youth Antelope** Jan. 4 – June 1 June 1 June 17 $125* Special Antelope Jan. 4 – June 1 June 1 June 17 $629* Preference Point Only July 1 – Nov. 1 N/A $31 Preference Point Only–Youth** July 1 – Nov. 1 N/A $10 Antelope–Reduced Price Doe/Fawn Antelope Jan. 4 – June 1 June 1 June 17 $49* Doe/Fawn Youth Antelope** Jan. 4 – June 1 June 1 June 17 $34* Moose** License Jan. 4 – Mar. 1 April 15 May 6 $1,997* Preference Point Only** July 1 – Nov. 1 N/A $150 Bighorn Sheep** License Jan. 4 – Mar. 1 April 15 May 6 $2,335* Preference Point Only** July 1 – Nov. 1 N/A $150 Bighorn Sheep–Reduced Price Ewe/Lamb Bighorn Sheep Jan. 4 – Mar. 1 April 15 May 6 $255* Ewe/Lamb Youth Bighorn Sheep** Jan. 4 – Mar. 1 April 15 May 6 $115* Mountain Goat** Jan. 4 – Mar. 1 April 15 May 6 $2,177* Wild Bison** Any Wild Bison Mar. 1 – Mar. 31 April 15 May 6 $4,417* Female or Calf Wild Bison Mar. 1 – Mar. 31 April 15 May 6 $2,767* Wild Turkey Spring Wild Turkey Jan. 4 – Feb. 1 Feb. 3 Feb. 18 $74 Fall Wild Turkey Apr. 1 – June 1 June 1 July 15 $74 Pheasant Glendo Apr. 1 – June 1 NA Aug. 5 Free Springer Apr. 1 – June 1 NA Aug. 5 Free Sandhill Crane -Limited Quota Apr. 1 – June 1 NA July 15 Free Furbearing Animal Limited Quota Furbearing Apr. 1 – June 1 NA July 15 Free Animal Trapping Permit Competitive Raffle Chances** Super Tag License July 15, 2020 – July 1, 2021 NA July 15 $10 Super Tag Trifecta License July 15, 2020 – July 1, 2021 NA July 15 $30 * A nonrefundable application fee of $15 for big game and wild bison is included in the amount to be remitted for each license applied for in the initial license drawing.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cervid TB DPP Testing August 2017
    Cervid TB DPP Testing August 2017 Elisabeth Patton, DVM, PhD, Diplomate ACVIM Veterinary Program Manager Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection Division of Animal Health Why Use the Serologic Test? Employ newer, accurate diagnostic test technology Minimizes capture and handling events for animal safety Expected to promote additional cervid TB testing • Requested by USAHA and cervid industry Comparable sensitivity and specificity to skin tests 2 Historical Timeline 3 Stat-Pak licensed for elk and red deer, 2009 White-tailed and fallow deer, 2010-11 2010 - USAHA resolution - USDA evaluate Stat-Pak as official TB test 2011 – Project to evaluate TB serologic tests in cervids (Cervid Serology Project); USAHA resolution to approve Oct 2012 – USDA licenses the Dual-Path Platform (DPP) secondary test for elk, red deer, white-tailed deer, and fallow deer Improved specificity compared to Stat-Pak Oct 2012 – USDA approves the Stat-Pak (primary) and DPP (secondary) as official bovine TB tests in elk, red deer, white- tailed deer, fallow deer and reindeer Recent Actions Stat-Pak is no longer in production 9 CFR 77.20 has been amended to approve the DPP as official TB program test. An interim rule was published on 9 January 2013 USDA APHIS created a Guidance Document (6701.2) to provide instructions for using the tests https://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/animal_ diseases/tuberculosis/downloads/vs_guidance_670 1.2_dpp_testing.pdf 4 Cervid Serology Project Objective 5 Evaluate TB detection tests for official bovine tuberculosis (TB) program use in captive and free- ranging cervids North American elk (Cervus canadensis) White-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) Reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) Primary/screening test AND Secondary Test: Dual Path Platform (DPP) Rapid immunochromatographic lateral-flow serology test Detect antibodies to M.
    [Show full text]
  • Bison and Elk in Yellowstone National Park - Linking Ecosystem, Animal Nutrition, and Population Processes
    Bison and Elk in Yellowstone National Park - Linking Ecosystem, Animal Nutrition, and Population Processes Part 3 - Final Report to U.S. Geological Survey Biological Resources Division Bozeman, MT Project: Spatial-Dynamic Modeling of Bison Carrying Capacity in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem: A Synthesis of Bison Movements, Population Dynamics, and Interactions with Vegetation Michael B. Coughenour Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado December 2005 INTRODUCTION Over the last three decades bison in Yellowstone National Park have increased in numbers and expanded their ranges inside the park up to and beyond the park boundaries (Meagher 1989a,b, Taper et al. 2000, Meagher et al. 2003). Potentially, they have reached, if not exceeded the capacity of the park to support them. The bison are infected with brucellosis, and it is feared that the disease will be readily transmitted to domestic cattle, with widespread economic repercussions. Brucellosis is an extremely damaging disease for livestock, causing abortions and impaired calf growth. After a long campaign beginning in 1934 and costing over $1.3 billion (Thorne et al. 1991), brucellosis has been virtually eliminated from cattle and bison everywhere in the conterminous United States except in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. Infection of any livestock in Montana, Idaho, or Wyoming would result in that state losing its brucellosis-free status, leading to considerable economic hardships resulting from intensified surveillance, testing, and control (Thorne et al. 1991). Management alternatives that have been considered include hazing animals back into the park, the live capture and holding of animals that leave the park, and culling or removal from within the park.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020-2021 Arizona Hunting Regulations
    Arizona Game and Fish Department 2020-2021 Arizona Hunting Regulations This publication includes the annual regulations for statewide hunting of deer, fall turkey, fall javelina, bighorn sheep, fall bison, fall bear, mountain lion, small game and other huntable wildlife. The hunt permit application deadline is Tuesday, June 9, 2020, at 11:59 p.m. Arizona time. Purchase Arizona hunting licenses and apply for the draw online at azgfd.gov. Report wildlife violations, call: 800-352-0700 Two other annual hunt draw booklets are published for the spring big game hunts and elk and pronghorn hunts. i Unforgettable Adventures. Feel-Good Savings. Heed the call of adventure with great insurance coverage. 15 minutes could save you 15% or more on motorcycle insurance. geico.com | 1-800-442-9253 | Local Office Some discounts, coverages, payment plans and features are not available in all states, in all GEICO companies, or in all situations. Motorcycle and ATV coverages are underwritten by GEICO Indemnity Company. GEICO is a registered service mark of Government Employees Insurance Company, Washington, DC 20076; a Berkshire Hathaway Inc. subsidiary. © 2019 GEICO ii ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT — AZGFD.GOV AdPages2019.indd 4 4/20/2020 11:49:25 AM AdPages2019.indd 5 2020-2021 ARIZONA HUNTING4/20/2020 REGULATIONS 11:50:24 AM 1 Arizona Game and Fish Department Key Contacts MAIN NUMBER: 602-942-3000 Choose 1 for known extension or name Choose 2 for draw, bonus points, and hunting and fishing license information Choose 3 for watercraft Choose 4 for regional
    [Show full text]
  • The Camel Farm Maintain an Enclosure Housing Goats in 15672 South Ave
    received a repeat citation for failing to The Camel Farm maintain an enclosure housing goats in 15672 South Ave. 1 E., Yuma, Arizona good repair. It had fencing with metal edges that were bent inward, sharp points protruding into the enclosure, and a gap The Camel Farm, operated by Terrill Al- large enough for an animal’s leg or head to Saihati, has failed to meet minimum become stuck. The facility was also cited for standards for the care of animals used in failing to maintain the perimeter fence in exhibition as established in the federal good repair and at a sufficient height of 8 Animal Welfare Act (AWA). The U.S. feet to function as a secondary containment Department of Agriculture (USDA) has system for the animals in the facility. A repeatedly cited The Camel Farm for section of the perimeter fence had a numerous infractions, including failing measured height of 5 feet, 4 inches. to provide animals (including sick, wounded, and lame ones) with adequate October 9, 2019: The USDA issued The veterinary care, failing to maintain Camel Farm a repeat citation for failing to enclosures in good repair, failing to have a method to remove pools of standing provide animals with drinking water, water around the water receptacles in failing to have an adequate number of enclosures housing a zebra, a donkey, employees to supervise contact between camels, and goats. The animals were the public and animals, failing to unable to drink from the receptacles without maintain clean and sanitary water standing in the water and mud.
    [Show full text]
  • Drawn by the Bison Late Prehistoric Native Migration Into the Central Plains
    DRAWN BY THE BISON LATE PREHISTORIC NATIVE MIGRATION INTO THE CENTRAL PLAINS LAUREN W. RITTERBUSH Popular images of the Great Plains frequently for instance, are described as relying heavily portray horse-mounted Indians engaged in on bison meat for food and living a nomadic dramatic bison hunts. The importance of these lifestyle in tune with the movements of the hunts is emphasized by the oft-mentioned de­ bison. More sedentary farming societies, such pendence of the Plains Indians on bison. This as the Mandan, Hidatsa, Pawnee, Oto, and animal served as a source of not only food but Kansa, incorporated seasonal long-distance also materials for shelter, clothing, contain­ bison hunts into their annual subsistence, ers, and many other necessities of life. Pursuit which also included gardening. In each case, of the vast bison herds (combined with the multifamily groups formed bands or tribal en­ needs of the Indians' horses for pasturage) af­ tities of some size that cooperated with one fected human patterns of subsistence, mobil­ another during formal bison hunts and other ity, and settlement. The Lakota and Cheyenne, community activities.! Given the importance of bison to these people living on the Great Plains, it is often assumed that a similar pattern of utilization existed in prehistory. Indeed, archeological KEY WORDS: migration, bison, Central Plains, studies have shown that bison hunting was Oneota, Central Plains tradition key to the survival of Paleoindian peoples of the Plains as early as 11,000 years ago. 2 If we Lauren W. Ritterbush is Assistant Professor of Anthropology at Kansas State University.
    [Show full text]
  • Differential Habitat Selection by Moose and Elk in the Besa-Prophet Area of Northern British Columbia
    ALCES VOL. 44, 2008 GILLINGHAM AND PARKER – HABITAT SELECTION BY MOOSE AND ELK DIFFERENTIAL HABITAT SELECTION BY MOOSE AND ELK IN THE BESA-PROPHET AREA OF NORTHERN BRITISH COLUMBIA Michael P. Gillingham and Katherine L. Parker Natural Resources and Environmental Studies Institute, University of Northern British Columbia, 3333 University Way, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada V2N 4Z9, email: [email protected] ABSTRACT: Elk (Cervus elaphus) populations are increasing in the Besa-Prophet area of northern British Columbia, coinciding with the use of prescribed burns to increase quality of habitat for ungu- lates. Moose (Alces alces) and elk are now the 2 large-biomass species in this multi-ungulate, multi- predator system. Using global positioning satellite (GPS) collars on 14 female moose and 13 female elk, remote-sensing imagery of vegetation, and assessments of predation risk for wolves (Canis lupus) and grizzly bears (Ursus arctos), we examined habitat use and selection. Seasonal ranges were typi- cally smallest for moose during calving and for elk during winter and late winter. Both species used largest ranges in summer. Moose and elk moved to lower elevations from winter to late winter, but subsequent calving strategies differed. During calving, moose moved to lowest elevations of the year, whereas elk moved back to higher elevations. Moose generally selected for mid-elevations and against steep slopes; for Stunted spruce habitat in late winter; for Pine-spruce in summer; and for Subalpine during fall and winter. Most recorded moose locations were in Pine-spruce during late winter, calv- ing, and summer, and in Subalpine during fall and winter.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Species of Special Concern and Vascular Plant Flora of the National
    Plant Species of Special Concern and Vascular Plant Flora of the National Elk Refuge Prepared for the US Fish and Wildlife Service National Elk Refuge By Walter Fertig Wyoming Natural Diversity Database The Nature Conservancy 1604 Grand Avenue Laramie, WY 82070 February 28, 1998 Acknowledgements I would like to thank the following individuals for their assistance with this project: Jim Ozenberger, ecologist with the Jackson Ranger District of Bridger-Teton National Forest, for guiding me in his canoe on Flat Creek and for providing aerial photographs and lodging; Jennifer Whipple, Yellowstone National Park botanist, for field assistance and help with field identification of rare Carex species; Dr. David Cooper of Colorado State University, for sharing field information from his 1994 studies; Dr. Ron Hartman and Ernie Nelson of the Rocky Mountain Herbarium, for providing access to unmounted collections by Michele Potkin and others from the National Elk Refuge; Dr. Anton Reznicek of the University of Michigan, for confirming the identification of several problematic Carex specimens; Dr. Robert Dorn for confirming the identification of several vegetative Salix specimens; and lastly Bruce Smith and the staff of the National Elk Refuge for providing funding and logistical support and for allowing me free rein to roam the refuge for plants. 2 Table of Contents Page Introduction . 6 Study Area . 6 Methods . 8 Results . 10 Vascular Plant Flora of the National Elk Refuge . 10 Plant Species of Special Concern . 10 Species Summaries . 23 Aster borealis . 24 Astragalus terminalis . 26 Carex buxbaumii . 28 Carex parryana var. parryana . 30 Carex sartwellii . 32 Carex scirpoidea var. scirpiformis .
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Study on the Physicochemical Parameters Of
    ienc Sc es al J ic o u Legesse et al., Chem Sci J 2017, 8:4 m r e n a h l DOI: 10.4172/2150-3494.1000171 C Chemical Sciences Journal ISSN: 2150-3494 Research Article Open Access A Comparative Study on the Physicochemical Parameters of Milk of Camel, Cow and Goat in Somali Regional State, Ethiopia Legesse A1*, Adamu F2, Alamirew K2 and Feyera T3 1Department of Chemistry, College of Natural and Computational Science, Ambo University, Ethiopia 2College of Natural and Computational Science, Jigjiga University, Ethiopia 3Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Ethiopia *Corresponding author: Abi Legesse, Department of Chemistry, College of Natural and Computational Science, Ambo University, Ethiopia, Tel: +251 11 236 2006; E- mail: [email protected] Received date: September 25, 2017; Accepted date: October 03, 2017; Published date: October 06, 2017 Copyright: © 2017 Legesse A, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Abstract This research was carried out to investigate key physicochemical parameters of milk samples collected from camel, cow and goat in Jigjiga district, Eastern Ethiopia. Sixty fresh milk samples were collected purposively from camels, cows and goats (twenty samples from each species) and analyzed. The results revealed that, cow milk had 6.30 ± 0.15 pH, 0.29 ± 0.04% titratable acidity, 14.6 ± 0.60% total solid, 0.75 ± 0.07% ash, 3.54 ± 0.12% protein, 5.54 ± 0.65% fat and 1.06 ± 0.03 specific gravity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bear in the Footprint: Using Ethnography to Interpret Archaeological Evidence of Bear Hunting and Bear Veneration in the Northern Rockies
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2014 THE BEAR IN THE FOOTPRINT: USING ETHNOGRAPHY TO INTERPRET ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE OF BEAR HUNTING AND BEAR VENERATION IN THE NORTHERN ROCKIES Michael D. Ciani The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Ciani, Michael D., "THE BEAR IN THE FOOTPRINT: USING ETHNOGRAPHY TO INTERPRET ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE OF BEAR HUNTING AND BEAR VENERATION IN THE NORTHERN ROCKIES" (2014). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 4218. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/4218 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE BEAR IN THE FOOTPRINT: USING ETHNOGRAPHY TO INTERPRET ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE OF BEAR HUNTING AND BEAR VENERATION IN THE NORTHERN ROCKIES By Michael David Ciani B.A. Anthropology, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, 2012 A.S. Historic Preservation, College of the Redwoods, Eureka, CA, 2006 Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Anthropology, Cultural Heritage The University of Montana Missoula, MT May 2014 Approved by: Sandy Ross, Dean of The Graduate School Graduate School Dr. Douglas H. MacDonald, Chair Anthropology Dr. Anna M. Prentiss Anthropology Dr. Christopher Servheen Forestry and Conservation Ciani, Michael, M.A., May 2014 Major Anthropology The Bear in the Footprint: Using Ethnography to Interpret Archaeological Evidence of Bear Hunting and Bear Veneration in the Northern Rockies Chairperson: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Food Habits of Deer and Three Classes of Livestock Author(S): Craig A
    Comparative Food Habits of Deer and Three Classes of Livestock Author(s): Craig A. McMahan Reviewed work(s): Source: The Journal of Wildlife Management, Vol. 28, No. 4 (Oct., 1964), pp. 798-808 Published by: Allen Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3798797 . Accessed: 13/07/2012 12:15 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Allen Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of Wildlife Management. http://www.jstor.org COMPARATIVEFOOD HABITSOF DEERAND THREECLASSES OF LIVESTOCK CRAIGA. McMAHAN,Texas Parksand Wildlife Department,Hunt Abstract: To observe forage competition between deer and livestock, the forage selections of a tame deer (Odocoileus virginianus), a goat, a sheep, and a cow were observed under four range conditions, using both stocked and unstocked experimental pastures, on the Kerr Wildlife Management Area in the Edwards Plateau region of Texas in 1959. The animals were trained in 2 months of preliminary testing. The technique employed consisted of recording the number of bites taken of each plant species by each animal during a 45-minute grazing period in each pasture each week for 1 year.
    [Show full text]
  • Anaplasma Phagocytophilum in the Highly Endangered Père David's
    Yang et al. Parasites & Vectors (2018) 11:25 DOI 10.1186/s13071-017-2599-1 LETTER TO THE EDITOR Open Access Anaplasma phagocytophilum in the highly endangered Père David’s deer Elaphurus davidianus Yi Yang1,3, Zhangping Yang2,3*, Patrick Kelly4, Jing Li1, Yijun Ren5 and Chengming Wang1,6* Abstract Eighteen of 43 (41.8%) Père David’s deer from Dafeng Elk National Natural Reserve, China, were positive for Anaplasma phagocytophilum based on real-time FRET-PCR and species-specific PCRs targeting the 16S rRNA or msp4. To our knowledge this is the first report of A. phagocytophilum in this endangered animal. Keywords: Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Père David’s deer, Elaphurus davidianus, China Letter to the Editor GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). The fluorescence reson- Père David’s deer (Elaphurus davidianus) are now found ance energy transfer (FRET) quantitative PCR targeting only in captivity although they occurred widely in north- the 16S rRNA gene of Anaplasma spp. [5] gave positive eastern and east-central China until they became extinct reactions for 18 deer (41.8%), including 8 females in the wild in the late nineteenth century [1]. In the (34.8%) and 10 males (50.0%). To investigate the species 1980s, 77 Père David’s deer were reintroduced back into of Anaplasma present, the positive samples were further China from Europe. Currently the estimated total popu- analyzed with species-specific primers targeting the 16S lation of Père David’s deer in the world is approximately rRNA gene of A. centrale, A. bovis, A. phagocytophilum 5000 animals, the majority living in England and China.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Nutritional Factors on the Development of Phosphatic Uroliths Using Meat Goats As a Model for Captive Giraffes
    THE IMPACT OF NUTRITIONAL FACTORS ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF PHOSPHATIC UROLITHS USING MEAT GOATS AS A MODEL FOR CAPTIVE GIRAFFES Kathleen Sullivan, MS,1* Eric van Heugten, PhD,1 Kimberly Ange-van Heugten, MS,1 Matthew H. Poore, PhD,1 Sharon Freeman, MS,1 Barbara Wolfe, DVM, PhD, DACZM2 1 Department of Animal Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695; 2The Wilds, Cumberland, OH 43732 Abstract Obstructive urolithiasis is a documented problem in domestic ruminants, such as the meat goat, and exotic herbivores, such as captive giraffe. These two species develop phosphorus based uroliths and are considered browsing ruminants. Due to the logistical challenges of performing studies with captive giraffe, a metabolic trial was conducted using meat goats as a model. The intent of this study was to determine the impact of type of diet (ADF-16 or Wild Herbivore complete pelleted feed) and complete pelleted feed to hay ratios (20 or 80% hay) on the development of urolithiasis in meat goats, in the context of captive giraffe feeding practices. The diet in which ADF-16 pellets were fed in combination with 20% hay had the lowest levels of fiber, the lowest calcium (Ca) to phosphorus (P) ratio, and the highest level of P compared to the other 3 diet treatments. From our results, we concluded that feeding the ADF-16 pellets with hay as 20% of the diet, produced a trend of high urinary P over the four week experimental period. There was also a tendency for a higher crystal count in the urine when hay was 20% of the diet.
    [Show full text]