DOCSLIB.ORG

This Fredskorpset-Norway

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
This Fredskorpset-Norway VUC LTTC OCE CC WCE Nr. 9 RAPPORT Odd Ragnar Hunnes Norleif Vik STUDENT EXCHANGE FOR DEVELOPMENT Report on a project Authors Odd Ragnar Hunnes and Norleif Vik Publisher Volda University College Year 2010 ISBN 978-82-7661-291-2 (digital version) ISSN 1891-5981 Front page Photo from Wikipedia Commons Print set Author Distribution http://www.hivolda.no/rapport © Author/Volda University College 2010 This material is protected by copyright law. Without explicit authorisation, reproduction is only allowed in so far as it is permitted by law or by agreement with a collecting society. The Report Series includes academic work in progress, as well as finished projects of a high standard. The reports may in some cases form parts of larger projects, or they may consist of educational materials. All published work reports are approved by the dean of the relevant faculty or a professionally competent person as well as the college’s research coordinator. CONTENTS PREFACE .................................................................................................................................. 5 COORDINATORS AND STUDENTS ..................................................................................... 6 SOME VITAL CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................. 13 PART 1 PRESENTATION ...................................................................................................... 18 1.1 PLANNING ................................................................................................................... 18 1.1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 18 1.1.2 Background and idea for the project ....................................................................... 19 1.1.3 Cooperating institutions .......................................................................................... 20 1.1.4 Main structure of the project ................................................................................... 22 1.1.5 Contact between the partners .................................................................................. 24 1.1.6 Recruitment ............................................................................................................. 25 1.2 PROGRAM AND APPROACH .................................................................................... 27 1.2.1 Joint planning and preparations ............................................................................... 27 1.2.2 The study programs during the stay abroad ............................................................ 27 1.2.3 Information program on return to home country .................................................... 29 1.2.4 Completion of the project ........................................................................................ 31 1.3 RIPPLE EFFECTS ......................................................................................................... 34 1.3.1 Friendly contact on and off campus ........................................................................ 34 1.3.2 Involvement in the project ....................................................................................... 34 1.3.3 Projects and programs ............................................................................................. 36 1.3.4 Long lasting careers ................................................................................................ 39 PART 2 EVALUATION .......................................................................................................... 40 2.1 METHOD ....................................................................................................................... 40 2.2 FROM THE PARTNER MEETINGS ........................................................................... 46 2.2.1 Coordinators and colleagues ................................................................................... 46 2.2.2 Items discussed in partner meetings ........................................................................ 46 2.3 FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE AFRICAN STUDENTS .................................. 58 2.3.1 Preparations ............................................................................................................. 58 2.3.2 Practical questions ................................................................................................... 59 2.3.3 Professional benefits ............................................................................................... 61 2.3.4 Goal statements ....................................................................................................... 65 2.3.5 Bridge builders ........................................................................................................ 67 2.3.6 Making Norwegian friends ...................................................................................... 68 2.3.7 Expectations and surprises ...................................................................................... 70 2.3.8 Development ........................................................................................................... 72 2.3.9 Coming home .......................................................................................................... 72 O.R. Hunnes and N. Vik: Student exchange for development. Report No. 9 (2010). Volda University College and Møreforsking Volda. 2.4 FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE NORWEGIAN STUDENTS ........................... 73 2.4.1 Information .............................................................................................................. 73 2.4.2 Practical questions ................................................................................................... 74 2.4.3 Professional benefits ............................................................................................... 75 2.4.4 Bridge builders ........................................................................................................ 77 2.4.5 Making African friends ........................................................................................... 78 2.5 FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF AFRICAN COLLEGE LEADERS .......................... 80 2.5.1 Responses from interviews ...................................................................................... 80 2.5.2 Excerpts from a survey ............................................................................................ 83 REFERENCES ......................................................................................................................... 85 APPENDIXES ......................................................................................................................... 87 4 O.R. Hunnes and N. Vik: Student exchange for development. Report No. 9 (2010). Volda University College and Møreforsking Volda. PREFACE The project ‘SRS 105 Exchange for Development’ was planned and carried out by five partner colleges: Chancellor College of University of Malawi and Lilongwe Teacher Training College in Malawi, Ongwediva College of Education and Windhoek College of Education in Namibia and Volda University College in Norway. The project was organized in cooperation with the Norwegian Peace Corps-Youth (FK-Youth) and is one of the projects with the highest number of participants in the new FK Youth program so far, with a total of 83 participants (39 from Norway, 24 from Malawi and 20 from Namibia). A majority of the 83 participants are going to teach Social Studies in primary/secondary school as their future occupation in Norway (North), Namibia and Malawi (South). The essence of the project has been to prepare the participants for the important job as teachers and ‘bridge builders’ between partner institutions and partner countries. For those of us who came up with the idea of an exchange project for teacher trainees and who have played key roles in its implementation, it is very important to offer a vote of thanks to everyone who in their various ways has contributed. Here we especially want to thank all the coordinators who have represented the four African partner institutions for their important role in the project, the evaluation included. They have contributed through written statements, discussions and interviews. Student participants have been giving their share of information through answering on a questionnaire and participating in group discussions and individual interviews. We have also been able to observe some of them teach their own students in their home countries. The report is written by the two project coordinators at Volda University College. Norleif Vik has been the North coordinator and overall coordinator of the project while Odd Ragnar Hunnes has been the deputy North coordinator. We acknowledge that we have been very active participants in the project. This fact will most probably influence the selection of information presented in the report as well as the interpretation of it. We should probably be expected to give a positively skewed picture of the project. Nevertheless, we have tried to balance this as best we can, but are of course aware that this report should be read as a report from a project as well as a report about a project. As such we hope that the report may contribute to a high quality of possible projects of similar nature in the time to come. It is our wish that the report will be read by many who are all hereby invited to communicate their response
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 71877/687532 09/5380- 18.09.2014
    A ROYAL NORWEGIAN MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND CARE SERVICES EFTA Surveillance Authority Rue Belliard 35 B-1040 Brussel Your ref Our ref Date 71877/687532 09/5380- 18.09.2014 Response from the Norwegian Government to the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s letter of formal notice - legislation on private import of alcohol 1. INTRODUCTION Reference is made to the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s (“the Authority”) letter of formal notice to Norway for maintaining in force certain legislation on private import of alcohol, dated 18 June 2014. The letter was forwarded from the Norwegian Ministry of Finance to the Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services, which is responsible for the Norwegian legislation on alcohol. By the Authority’s e-mail of 3 July 2014, an extension of the deadline for Norway’s response was granted until 18 September 2014. On behalf of the Norwegian Government (“the Government”), the Ministry of Health and Care Services hereby gives its response to the letter of formal notice. The Government respectfully submits that the Norwegian requirement on functional and structural separation between the undertaking selling the alcoholic beverages and the undertaking delivering the beverages does not violate Article 11 and/or 36 EEA. The Government refers in this regard to its letters of 21 August 2012, 20 December 2012 and 24 January 2014, as well as to its letter of 21 December 2009'. In addition, the Government would like to make the following remarks. 1 Complaint concerning the import an distribution of alcohol in Norway, case 67389/539008. See the remarks on question 4 and 5.___________________________________________________________ Postal address Visiting address Telephone* Departement of Public Our officer POBox 8011 Dep Teatergt, 9 +47 22 24 90 90 Health Hege Christina 0030 Oslo Vat no.
    [Show full text]
  • Click Here for Download
    GUIDE TO HIGHER EDUCATION IN NORWAY STUDY IN NORWAY. STUDYINNORWAY.NO FACTS ABOUT NORWAY OFFICIAL NAME: The Kingdom of Norway LOCATION: Northern Europe with borders to Finland, Sweden, Russia, the North Sea and the North Atlantic Ocean WELCOME AREA: 385,186 km2 MAINLAND: 323,787 km2 SVALBARD AND JAN MAYEN: 61,399 km2 TO NORWAY. LENGTH OF COASTLINE: 25,148 km, including fjords STUDY OFF THE BEATEN TRACK LARGEST LAKE: Mjøsa, 362 km2 – GO NORTH! HIGHEST MOUNTAIN: Galdhøpiggen, 2,469 m POPULATION: 5 258 317 (01.01.2017) CAPITAL CITY: Oslo Education for all, high academic quality, a modern society GOVERNMENT: Constitutional monarchy and an attractive lifestyle. These are key phrases used by international students in Norway, and it is all true. LANGUAGE: Norwegian Bokmål and Nynorsk and in some districts also Sámi STUDYINNORWAY.NO MONETARY UNIT: Norwegian kroner, NOK TERRAIN: 44 national parks and 11 glaciers NATURAL RESOURCES: Petroleum, copper, natural gas, fish, timber, hydropower π π Source: Statistics Norway GUIDE TO HIGHER EDUCATION IN NORWAY 04-05 STUDY IN NORWAY “Education for all” is the basic principle of the Norwegian educational system. In addition to the diploma, all students According to the law, every child is ensured a minimum of 13 years’ education, will also receive a Diploma Supplement THERE IS LOTS OF regardless of social or cultural background and possible special needs. The (DS) from their Norwegian institution. STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Ministry of Education and Research is determined to make the Norwegian The DS gives a supplementary description AND INVOLVEMENT. educational system one of the best in the world, based on a framework of of the qualification obtained with a view MASTER STUDENT, USA lifelong learning.
    [Show full text]
  • Religion Education in Norway: Tension Or Harmony Between Human Rights and Christian Cultural Heritage?
    Religion Education in Norway: Tension or Harmony between Human Rights and Christian Cultural Heritage? BENGT-OVE ANDREASSEN University of Tromsø Abstract Both research and public and scholarly debate on religious education (RE) in Norway have mostly revolved around the subject in primary and secondary school called Christianity, Religion and Ethics (KRL) (later renamed Religion, Philosophies of Life and Ethics, RLE), not least due to the criticisms raised by the UN’s Human Rights Com- mittee in 2004 and the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in 2007 of the Norwegian model for RE in primary and secondary schools. The RE subject in upper secondary school, however, is hardly ever mentioned. The same applies to teacher education. This article therefore aims at providing some insight into how RE has developed in the Norwegian educational system overall, ranging from primary and secondary to upper secondary and including the different forms of teacher education. Keywords: religious education, teacher education, educational system, human rights, Norway Historical Background The development of religious education (RE) in Norway can be described in three main perspectives which link with historical periods: firstly, the Chris- tian education policy in the period from 1736 (when confirmation was made obligatory for all people) to 1860; secondly, the gradual secularisation of the school from 1860, as new subjects supplemented and challenged Christian- ity as the main curricular focus in schools, to 1969, when a new Education Act stated that RE should no longer should be confessionally rooted in Christianity. The period of religious instruction in Norwegian schools was then formally over, and ‘separative religious education’, in what has been © The Finnish Society for the Study of Religion Temenos Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 School Education in Norway
    1. SCHOOL EDUCATION IN NORWAY – 13 Chapter 1 School education in Norway While Norway’s results in the OECD’s Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) are at or above the OECD average depending on the subject, these outcomes are not considered satisfactory given Norway’s high levels of spending on education. There are also indications that the quality of education provided varies between municipalities with otherwise similar characteristics. The first publication of PISA results in 2000 was described by stakeholders in Norway as a “PISA shock”, which has helped focus attention on the monitoring of quality in education. Over the past ten years, there has been a strong focus on building up national tools and procedures to monitor quality at different levels of the system with a view to improve practices and raise performance. This national agenda is coupled with efforts to build up capacity at all levels and support networking among schools and school owners to strengthen collective learning. This approach reflects Norway’s well-established tradition of local autonomy, with individual schools being “owned” by municipalities and counties and accountable to them rather than more distant national bodies. OECD REVIEWS OF EVALUATION AND ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION: NORWAY © OECD 2011 14 – 1. SCHOOL EDUCATION IN NORWAY This chapter provides background information that will help readers not familiar with the Norwegian education system understand the context in which evaluation and assessment takes place. The chapter provides a brief overview of the current national demographic, political and economic context as well as a description of the key features of the Norwegian education system.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to South Dakota Norwegian-American Collections
    GUIDE TO COLLECTIONS RELATING TO SOUTH DAKOTA NORWEGIAN-AMERICANS Compiled by Harry F. Thompson, Ph.D. Director of Research Collections and Publications The Center for Western Studies With the assistance of Arthur R. Huseboe, Ph.D. and Paul B. Olson Additional assistance by Carol Riswold, D. Joy Harris, and Laura Plowman Originally published in 1991 by The Center for Western Studies, Augustana College, Sioux Falls, SD 57197 and updated in 2007. Original publication was made possible by a grant from the South Dakota Committee on the Humanities and by a gift from Harold L. Torness of Sisseton, South Dakota. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Albright College 2 Augustana College, The Center for Western Studies 3 Augustana College, Mikkelsen Library 4 Augustana College (IL), Swenson Swedish Immigration Research Center 5 Black Hills State University 6 Brookings Public Library 7 Canton Public Library 8 Centerville Public Library 9 Codington County Historical Society 10 Cornell University Libraries 11 Dakota State University 12 Dakota Wesleyan University 13 Dewey County Library 14 Elk Point Community Library 15 Grant County Public Library 16 Phoebe Apperson Hearst Library 17 J. Roland Hove 18 Luther College 19 Minnehaha County Historical Society 20 Minnehaha County Rural Public Library 21 Minnesota Historical Society, Research Center 2 22 Mitchell Area Genealogical Society 23 Mobridge Public Library 24 National Archives--Central Plains Region 25 North Dakota State University, North Dakota Institute for Regional Studies 26 Norwegian American Historical Association 27 James B. Olson 28 Rapid City Public Library 29 Rapid City Sons of Norway Borgund Lodge I-532 30 Regional Center for Mission--Region III, ELCA 31 St.
    [Show full text]
  • Minority Parents' Experiences with the Norwegian Nature and O
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives Anne Sine van Marion “BEND THE FISH WHILE IT IS STILL FRESH” Minority parents’ experiences with the Norwegian nature and outdoors discourses in barnehager Master’s Thesis in Childhood Studies May 2013 Department of Norwegian Centre for Child Research, NOSEB Faculty of Social Science and Technology Management Norwegian University fo Science and Technology, NTNU Trondheim, Norway ABSTRACT This study aims at providing an analysis of the experiences of non-Scandinavian minority parents with children in Norwegian barnehager (early childhoood settings) where spending time in nature and the outdoors represents an important part of the programme. The fieldwork and data collection took place in a city in Norway in March to June 2012 and is collected through semi-structured interviews. In the analysis of the data theoretical perspectives of ideas, values and cultural practices within the dominant Norwegian nature and outdoor life discourses and the discourses dominating the view on children and childhood in Norway are utilized. In the analyzing process concepts such as culture, adaptation, reciprocity and resistance have been useful tools to understand the processes of meaning making that take place when people from more cultures meet and have to negotiate and re-negotiate their patterns for life. Theoretical perspectives and ideas of the dominant discourses of the North influencing the views on children and childhood have also been draw on. Due to former colonialization, and to globalization, these ideas have spread to large parts of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Living and Working in Norway // Living and Working in Norway
    Living and working in Norway // Living and working in Norway // Contents Facts about Norway 3 Culture 6 Labour market trends 8 How to find a job in Norway 10 Checklist – moving to Norway 14 Unemployment and social insurance 16 (Folketrygden) Employment terms and conditions 18 Education/accreditation of qualifications 22 Housing in Norway 24 Useful reading about Norway 25 CV/application letter 26 SVALBARD JAN MAYEN Eggøya Ny-Ålesund Olonkinbyen Longyearbyen Barentsburg Polarsirkelen Facts about Norway // Norway contains large areas of unspoilt countryside which offer abundant opportunities for outdoor pursuits, including sporting challenges. Geography approximately 50 000 islands of which Norway extends over 1 750 km between just 2 000 are inhabited. the 58th and 71st degrees north, and as Norway is a country of many such is characterised by great distances. mountains. From the inland mountains If you imagine an axis at the southern and plateaux, the landscape descends tip of the country and rotate it through sharply towards the coast. The western 180 degrees on a map of Europe, the parts are characterised by steep mountains opposite end would reach as far south as and deep valleys which soften gradually central Italy. At its widest, the country into wide valleys and rolling hills in the covers 420 km from east to west, at its eastern parts. The west features fjords narrowest just 6 km. cutting deep into the country; these are With a total area of 387 000 square in fact sub-sea extensions of the valleys. kilometres, Norway is the seventh A quarter of the country is forested, and largest country in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Norway's Jazz Identity by © 2019 Ashley Hirt MA
    Mountain Sound: Norway’s Jazz Identity By © 2019 Ashley Hirt M.A., University of Idaho, 2011 B.A., Pittsburg State University, 2009 Submitted to the graduate degree program in Musicology and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Musicology. __________________________ Chair: Dr. Roberta Freund Schwartz __________________________ Dr. Bryan Haaheim __________________________ Dr. Paul Laird __________________________ Dr. Sherrie Tucker __________________________ Dr. Ketty Wong-Cruz The dissertation committee for Ashley Hirt certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: _____________________________ Chair: Date approved: ii Abstract Jazz musicians in Norway have cultivated a distinctive sound, driven by timbral markers and visual album aesthetics that are associated with the cold mountain valleys and fjords of their home country. This jazz dialect was developed in the decade following the Nazi occupation of Norway, when Norwegians utilized jazz as a subtle tool of resistance to Nazi cultural policies. This dialect was further enriched through the Scandinavian residencies of African American free jazz pioneers Don Cherry, Ornette Coleman, and George Russell, who tutored Norwegian saxophonist Jan Garbarek. Garbarek is credited with codifying the “Nordic sound” in the 1960s and ‘70s through his improvisations on numerous albums released on the ECM label. Throughout this document I will define, describe, and contextualize this sound concept. Today, the Nordic sound is embraced by Norwegian musicians and cultural institutions alike, and has come to form a significant component of modern Norwegian artistic identity. This document explores these dynamics and how they all contribute to a Norwegian jazz scene that continues to grow and flourish, expressing this jazz identity in a world marked by increasing globalization.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Peacebuilding As Small State Foreign Policy: Norway's Peace
    Peacebuilding as Small State Foreign Policy: Norway’s Peace Engagement in a Changing International Context Forthcoming in International Studies (2014) Kristian Stokke Department of Sociology and Human Geography, University of Oslo Abstract This article examines the emergence and transformation of Norway’s peace engagement in the context of changing international relations. Focusing on foreign policy discourses and practices, the article portrays peace engagement as value-based efforts to support resolution of distant intrastate conflicts, and a strategy to promote Norway’s interests and influence in international relations. The article also argues that changing international relations after the turn of the century has challenged and reoriented Norway’s peace engagement in a more realist direction. Foreign policy discourses and practices are increasingly based on a broad notion of interests that also includes ideals of peace, democracy and development. This means that peace engagement can support a domestic political consensus on foreign policy, and simultaneously promote Norway’s standing, relevance and influence in international relations. Peace engagement has thus been institutionalized as a foreign policy that promotes peace while also addressing the challenges associated with smallness in international relations. Keywords: small state, foreign policy, discourse, peace, Norway, Sri Lanka, Burma/Myanmar 1 Introduction Studies of international relations have tended to privilege major actors in world politics, their economic and security interests, and hard power capabilities and strategies. Small states have been given less overall attention and their international strategies are often portrayed as ‘playing it small’ by aligning themselves to major powers in security alliances to overcome their lack of hard power capabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Student Dropout in Upper Secondary Education in Norway
    London Review of Education DOI:https://doi.org/10.18546/LRE.15.2.12 Volume15,Number2,July2017 Student dropout in upper secondary education in Norway: A challenge to the principles of the welfare state? KristofferHalvorsrud* Centre for Psychiatry (Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine), Queen Mary University of London, UK Abstract ThisarticlepresentsareviewofextantresearchonstudentdropoutinNorway,originally undertaken as part of a systematic review. The article contextualizes the foundational principle of equality as championed by the welfare state and identifies the significance of dropoutinuppersecondaryeducationinNorway.Thearticlethenassesseswhetherdropout hasbeensufficientlyaddressed,byexploringdropoutmeasuresthathavebeenimplemented andevaluated.Itisarguedthatalthoughequalityofaccesstouppersecondaryeducationhas beenimproved,theenduringsignificanceofstudentdropoutrevealsconcealededucational inequalitiesofoutcomesinasocialdemocratic‘welfarestate’. Keywords: dropout;uppersecondaryeducation;Nordicwelfaremodel;reviewofresearch; evaluationstudies Introduction ParallelingthesituationinotherOrganisationforEconomicCo-operationandDevelopment (OECD)countries,studentdropoutfromuppersecondaryeducationandtraininginNorway constitutesasignificantpolicychallenge(OECD,2016).Themajorityofresearchonthisissue inNorwayhasanalysedstudent/registrydata(seee.g.Eielsenet al.,2013;Huitfeldtet al.,2016; Markussenet al.,2008;Størenet al.,2007),butthisresearchalonecannottelluswhichmeasures arethemosteffectiveorinformpractitionersandpolicymakersabouthowbesttoinvesttheir
    [Show full text]
  • Secondary Education in Scandinavia: Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Plus the U.S
    Secondary Education in Scandinavia: Denmark, Norway, Sweden, plus the U.S. Perspective Presenters: • Christopher Adams, Indiana University, [email protected] TAICEP Annual • LesLee Clauson Eicher, AACRAO International, Conference [email protected] September 5 – 7, 2017 • Erik Kyhlberg, Swedish Council for Higher Education, Rome, Italy [email protected] • Rolf Lofstad, Norwegian Agency for Quality Assurance in Education (NOKUT), [email protected] Scandinavia DENMARK Educational Ladder: Denmark Compulsory Non-compulsory Studentereksamen Note: The upper secondary programs will be subject to Højere Handelseksamen change in the coming years, following a political agreement Højere Teknisk Eksamen between the Danish government and a majority in Højere Forberedelseseksamen the Danish Parliament. Primary and Lower Secondary Education: Denmark • Folkeskole is a free, public school system with a comprehensive (un-streamed) curriculum. •Compulsory education = 10 years: 1 year pre-school + grades 1-9 (typically ages 6- 16). An optional grade 10 also exists in the Folkeskole. •School-leaving examination certificate is the Afgangsbevis. Upper Secondary Education: Denmark – the Details Legislation, school system and management The Ministry of Education issues the regulations according to which the schools work. The schools, which are spread throughout Denmark, are self-governing institutions with different histories and academic profiles. They finance the implementation of one or more of the upper secondary education programmes by means of grants from the Ministry of Education provided on the basis of student numbers. The head of the school answers to a board, the composition of which reflects the school’s specific profile. The teachers and students of the school appoint representatives to the board. The school board appoints and dismisses the head teacher and has overall responsibility for the running of the school and its activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Higher Education in the Nordic Countries
    TemaNord 2015:526 TemaNord TemaNord 2015:526 TemaNord Ved Stranden 18 DK-1061 Copenhagen K www.norden.org Higher Education in the Nordic Countries Evaluation of the Nordic agreement on admission to higher education Higher Education in the Nordic Countries The Nordic agreement on admission to higher education aims to ensure that in all the Nordic countries applicants to higher education from another Nordic country should be considered for admission on the same or equivalent basis as local applicants. In 2014 the Nordic Institute of Studies in Innovation, Research and Education (NIFU) evaluated the agreement. In the report the evaluators give a description and a mapping of Nordic student mobility in a European context, as well an evaluation how appropriate and effective the agreement is. It is concluded that the agreement and Nordic cooperation is largely taken for granted and that the agreement has both a practical and symbolic value for Nordic cooperation. For the future development four possible scenarios and a set of general recommendations are given. TemaNord 2015:526 ISBN 978-92-893-4051-9 (PRINT) ISBN 978-92-893-4053-3 (PDF) ISBN 978-92-893-4052-6 (EPUB) ISSN 0908-6692 TN2015526 omslag.indd 1 01-04-2015 10:27:37 Higher Education in the Nordic Countries Evaluation of the Nordic agreement on admission to higher education Mari Elken, Elisabeth Hovdhaugen and Jannecke Wiers‐Jenssen TemaNord 2015:526 Higher Education in the Nordic Countries Evaluation of the Nordic agreement on admission to higher education Mari Elken, Elisabeth Hovdhaugen and Jannecke Wiers‐Jenssen ISBN 978‐92‐893‐4051‐9 (PRINT) ISBN 978‐92‐893‐4053‐3 (PDF) ISBN 978‐92‐893‐4052‐6 (EPUB) http://dx.doi.org/10.6027/TN2015‐526 TemaNord 2015:526 ISSN 0908‐6692 © Nordic Council of Ministers 2015 Layout: Hanne Lebech Cover photo: ImageSelect Print: Rosendahls‐Schultz Grafisk Printed in Denmark This publication has been published with financial support by the Nordic Council of Ministers.
    [Show full text]