DOCSLIB.ORG

Pirinc Reports On

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pirinc Reports On PIRINC REPORTS ON mill ilium PIHI Hill i» Ml in in III mill . Hill CONCISE REPORTS ON WORLD OIL AND GENERAL INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENTS OF INTEREST TO THE PETROLEUM INDUSTRY Published by the PETROLEUM INDUSTRY RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INC., 122 East 42nd Street, New York 17, New York • Telephone: OXford 7-3774 HARRY B. HILTS, Chairman, Board of Trustee,s JOHN H. LICHBLAU, Editorial and Research Director November 11, 1957 MIDDLE EAST SPOTLIGHTS Page .USSR EXTENDS PERMANENT FOOTHOLD IN MIDDLE EAST Soviet Union Now Permanently Established in Area Purpose: Control of Free World's Major Oil Deposits All M.E. Countries Increase Economic Ties w/Sovbloc 2 ............... PROTECTING EUROPE AGAINST NEW MIDDLE EAST OIL CRISIS Increased Explorations in Other Areas High Level of Tanker Construction Activity Problem of Additional Stock Capacity for Europe Public Ignores Industry's Cost in Providing "Flexibility" THE BIG MIDDLE EAST PIPELINE PROJECT Kuwait -Iraq-Turkey Project Now Questionable Iraq's Dilemma: Turkish Pipeline vs. Arab Unity Alternative Plans to Increase Iraq's Production 6 ............... THE IRANIAN PIPELINE PROJECT Qum-Iskenderun Project Still in Early Discussion Stage .THE ITALIAN ENTRY INTO IRAN The SIRIP Venture Not Necessarily Optimum Deal for Iran No Deviation from Middle East's 50/50 Principle Good Deal for AGIP; Could be Way for More Non-Majors into M.E. Mattel's Public Stature Raised at Majors' Expense Consortium also has Plans for Iran 10 TRENDS IN MIDDLE EAST OIL PRODUCTION Iran only Oil Country Unaffected by Suez Crisis Comparative Oil Output and Growth Rates, June-Sept.-Periods All Oil Countries Benefiting by Iraq's Loss 12, .EGYPT New Sinai Fields Reverse Declining Production Trend Structure of Oriental Petroleum Company Oil Sel-Sufficiency to Decrease Sovbloc Imports Economy Fairly Strong Despite Blocked Foreign Funds Suez Canal Now Egypt's Major Income Earner Current Canal Improvement limited to restoration of 1956 Draft USSR EXTENDS PERMANENT FOOTHOLD IN MIDDLE EAST Political developments in the Middle East continue to be the main event in the world political arena. For the moment the heat is off the Arab-Israel dispute and instead is on intra-Arab feuds as well as the local manifestations of the East-West struggle. The future course of events can, of course, only be sketched in the roughest terms, in view of all the imponderables and unknowable factors entering the situation. How- ever, this much is sure: the USSR is now firmly established in the Middle East and will remain a major factor in all Middle East affairs from here on in. At the same time it has become clear that Arab unity is not nearly as cohesive a factor in the Middle East as it appeared when Israel seemed the only source of trouble in the area. Nevertheless, unity is genuinely desired by all Arab nations and in the absence of countervailing forces can be expected to play an important part in Arab policy-making. Both these factors have a direct bearing on the Middle East oil situation. Since the USSR's exceptional effort to gain a foothold in the Middle East is not caused by any Soviet need for Middle East oil or by any other special economic or strategic considerations, it seems clear that the Kremlin is out to gain control over the Middle East oil producing and trans- porting countries for the purpose of gaining an economic stranglehold on non-communist Europe. Since there is no doubt that the USSR is now fully entrenched in Syria and fairly strongly in Egypt, this means that it already sits astride all existing oil transportation routes between the Middle East and Europe, with the exception of the Cape of Good Hope route. This does not permit the USSR to turn the flow of Middle East oil on and off at will from now on. But in any future crisis - and there will undoubtedly be some - the presence of direct Soviet influence in both Syria and Egypt must be taken into account. Of course, there is always the possibility of a change in government in either or both these countries. But barring such an eventuality, Soviet influence in both countries will continue to grow, as their trade, aid and foreign investment becomes increasingly Soviet-oriented. This is particularly .true of Syria which, being a small and poor country, can easily be totally supplied by the USSR, which can also take most of its exports. According to all reports from Syria, this is exactly what is happening. If this trend con- tinues, the country should be economically completely inside the Soviet orbit within the next couple of years. A preliminary indication of the strength of this trend was given last spring when the Czech firm Technoexport was awarded the contract to build the country's first refinery, at a cost of $29 million. The award was so obviously based on political rather than technical or economic considerations that it briefly became a rallying point for all anti-government forces who pointed, in vain, to the fact that the American firm Procon, Inc., had submitted a bid which, at an only slightly higher cost, would have given Syria a far superior refinery, including Procon's high-octane process. FIRING - 2 But the "neutralist" countries are not the only ones in the Middle East affected by Soviet economic infiltration tactics. Even such pro- western countries as Lebanon, Iran and the Sudan are reporting very sharp increases in trade with the Soviet bloc. At the moment there are no polit- ical strings attached to these deals. But since they are all much more im- portant and advantageous to the Middle East countries concerned than to the Soviet bloc, which has no real need for any of the Middle East's export commodities, it is obvious that USSR's real interest in all this is to extend its political influence in the world's richest oil area. PROTECTING EUROPE AGAINST A NEW MIDDLE EAST OIL CRISIS For Western Europe all this means that some 70 percent of its oil needs come from an area whose existing political instability has now been compounded by the successful entry of the West's official enemy No. 1 on the scene. How to protect itself against the obvious dangers of this situation is something that concerns not only the countries dependent on Middle East oil but also the companies which produce, ship and market it. For they can contribute greatly in providing the degree of flexibility which would im- munize Western Europe from the immediate consequences of another Middle East oil shut-down. To a considerable extent this is already being done. The explora- tion of new concession areas in Venezuela (which during the last crisis had little spare capacity) and the opening-up of the Sahara and of new deposits in Sicily and France are all designed to accomplish this. For, were it not for the political risks in the Middle East, there would be much less motiva- tion to find new oil supply sources for Western Europe, in view of the vast and growing reserves in the Middle East. The high level of super tanker construction activity, in the face of the sustained current slump in world tanker trade, is another way to create additional flexibility. For it means that in case any or all of the existing shipping routes from the Middle East become suddenly closed, alterna- tive ones can be used. Of course, not all the 34 million dw tons of existing firm tanker orders are meant to carry Middle East oil to Europe. But since the world tanker fleet is expected to increase at an annual rate of l6 - 17 percent while the annual increase in world oil consumption may not even reach the generally quoted figure of 6-7percent in the next few years, there will certainly be a lot more excess carrying capacity available in the next 3-5 years than we had in any previous post war year. BUILDING ADDITIONAL STOCK CAPACITY Some additional stock capacity in Europe, as a buffer against any sudden emergency, would also be part of the overall effort to increase flexib- ility vis-a-vis the Middle East. Very little has been done on this particular aspect of it, largely because of the exceedingly large amount of unproductive capital that would have to be tied up in order to maintain enough oil stocks to supply all of Europe for any significant period of time. FIRING - 3 Determining the level of such emergency stocks is, of course, an extremely difficult and delicate procedure, since it has to be based largely on hypothetical assumptions, regarding the type and length of future emergencies. The only thing that can be said from recently gained experience is that if the emergency were limited to the Middle East, and not part of a general international conflagration, Western Europe could certainly temporarily get along on 75 to 80 percent of its normal needs. Furthermore, it could count on receiving a combined 50 to 60 percent of its reduced oil requirements from the Western hemisphere together with its own domestic production. Additional coal ship- ments from the U. S. would also help to reduce the oil deficit. This means that, at the most, emergency stocks would have to fill a gap equivalent to only about 1/3 of Europe's normal oil requirements. At the present rate of consumption for Western Europe and adjacent areas this would mean approximately 1 million b/d, disregarding seasonal fluctuations. However, since it would take three to four weeks to call forth the required additional quantity of oil from the Western hemisphere and to complete the necessary tanker transfers, an additional 750,000 - 850,000 b/d would have to be stocked up for this initial period.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Malacca-Max the Ul Timate Container Carrier
    MALACCA-MAX THE UL TIMATE CONTAINER CARRIER Design innovation in container shipping 2443 625 8 Bibliotheek TU Delft . IIIII I IIII III III II II III 1111 I I11111 C 0003815611 DELFT MARINE TECHNOLOGY SERIES 1 . Analysis of the Containership Charter Market 1983-1992 2 . Innovation in Forest Products Shipping 3. Innovation in Shortsea Shipping: Self-Ioading and Unloading Ship systems 4. Nederlandse Maritieme Sektor: Economische Structuur en Betekenis 5. Innovation in Chemical Shipping: Port and Slops Management 6. Multimodal Shortsea shipping 7. De Toekomst van de Nederlandse Zeevaartsector: Economische Impact Studie (EIS) en Beleidsanalyse 8. Innovatie in de Containerbinnenvaart: Geautomatiseerd Overslagsysteem 9. Analysis of the Panamax bulk Carrier Charter Market 1989-1994: In relation to the Design Characteristics 10. Analysis of the Competitive Position of Short Sea Shipping: Development of Policy Measures 11. Design Innovation in Shipping 12. Shipping 13. Shipping Industry Structure 14. Malacca-max: The Ultimate Container Carrier For more information about these publications, see : http://www-mt.wbmt.tudelft.nl/rederijkunde/index.htm MALACCA-MAX THE ULTIMATE CONTAINER CARRIER Niko Wijnolst Marco Scholtens Frans Waals DELFT UNIVERSITY PRESS 1999 Published and distributed by: Delft University Press P.O. Box 98 2600 MG Delft The Netherlands Tel: +31-15-2783254 Fax: +31-15-2781661 E-mail: [email protected] CIP-DATA KONINKLIJKE BIBLIOTHEEK, Tp1X Niko Wijnolst, Marco Scholtens, Frans Waals Shipping Industry Structure/Wijnolst, N.; Scholtens, M; Waals, F.A .J . Delft: Delft University Press. - 111. Lit. ISBN 90-407-1947-0 NUGI834 Keywords: Container ship, Design innovation, Suez Canal Copyright <tl 1999 by N. Wijnolst, M .
    [Show full text]
  • A Short History of the Suez Canal.Pdf
    Acknowledgements: Thanks to my son Adam and daughter-in-law Kylie Twomey who encouraged (read constantly hounded) me to write a book that related to a lecture that I had written. I promise that this is the start of a series! Also, to my son Andrew and daughter-in-law Rachel who inspire me to maintain a thirst for greater knowledge. And to my wife Julie who supported me during the long hours of putting this book together, providing suggestions and took responsibility for formatting the pages. And to Colin Patterson at Mumby Media for his valued input in reviewing this document prior to publication. Front cover: Photo courtesy Aashay Baindur/Wikimedia https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Capesize_bulk_carrier_at_Suez_Canal_Bridge.JPG Back cover: Photo courtesy Alydox at English Wikipedia https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:DeLesseps.JPG Table of Contents A Few Interesting Canal Facts.......................................................... 1 The Course of the Suez Canal ........................................................... 2 Regional Geography .......................................................................... 3 Ancient Projects ................................................................................. 6 Early Ambitions ................................................................................. 9 Early Troubles ..................................................................................13 Canal Construction ..........................................................................16 Canal Completed
    [Show full text]
  • May 2016,ISSN 0474–6279 4 Member Country Focus Centre for Dialogue Iran Oiliran Show Appointment Newsline Obituary
    Visit our website www.opec.org The ultimate resource It has been a common response throughout the history a more creative, more dynamic and more competitive en- of human societies to look elsewhere for solutions to ergy sector. In this, the role of each country’s national oil complex challenges. When man first set out across the company, under the inspiring leadership of their respec- Tigris-Euphrates river valley, he went not only in search of tive ministries, should not be overlooked. And together, better living conditions but also knowledge and wisdom. in various ways, they have each been able to start putting It is not much different today. Developing countries together programmes of action and investment, research of the ‘global south’ — in Africa, Asia, and the Middle and development, that promises to make each country a Commentary East — often find themselves looking to other countries leader in its own right. for the newest approaches to economic development and What the Oil Show in Iran also demonstrated, as one the latest technological innovations. of our feature articles in this edition suggests, is the coun- Sometimes lost in this rush for the ‘newest’ and the try’s resilience. That is to say, even without necessarily ‘latest’ is the recognition that local communities often having access to all the inputs, materials and resources have a better understanding of local challenges, and that that companies might want or desire, they have still found the people on the ground may have some of the greatest a way to move forward — and not only move forward but insights.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of Economic Dominance
    1 A Brief History of Economic Dominance The United States has the sticks and carrots. —John Foster Dulles in a memorandum to President Dwight Eisenhower in the aftermath of the Suez crisis1 The Suez Canal is as good a metaphor as any for economic dominance. It is well known that the Suez crisis of 1956 irretrievably buried any hopes (or illusions, some would say) that the United Kingdom might retain its status as a great power. But the history of the canal actually bookends both the apogee and collapse of the British empire. And at both points in time, the economi- cally dominant creditor country gained at the expense of the enfeebled and indebted power. Opposed originally to the canal’s construction, which began in 1859, the United Kingdom subsequently rued its lack of a direct stake once the water- way’s strategic possibilities as its “highway to India” and “backdoor to the East” became evident. The original Suez Canal company was majority-owned by the French, with the Egyptian ruler, Ismail Pasha—the khedive or viceroy nominally representing the Ottoman ruler in Istanbul—enjoying a 44 percent stake. By 1875, however, Egypt teetered on the edge of insolvency, overstretched by military adventurism in the Sudan and Ethiopia, seduced into profligacy stemming from the khedive’s grandiose ambition to make Cairo the Paris-on- the-Nile, and debilitated by dwindling export revenues once stability returned to international cotton markets after the US Civil War. A debt-to-GDP ratio of close to 200 percent, mostly owed to restive European bondholders, forced the khedive to sell his stake for a paltry sum of 4 million pounds, which amounted to 4 percent of his debt and 7 percent of Egypt’s GDP at the time.
    [Show full text]
  • A Maritime Geostrategy of Petroleum Distribution Jean-Paul Rodrigue
    Document generated on 09/26/2021 2:21 p.m. Cahiers de géographie du Québec Straits, Passages and Chokepoints A Maritime Geostrategy of Petroleum Distribution Jean-Paul Rodrigue Les détroits maritimes Article abstract Volume 48, Number 135, décembre 2004 The transportation of petroleum represents one of the most strategically important circulations of resources in the global economy. Its role cannot be URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/011797ar overstated. Yet, petroleum has become a “strategically invisible” commodity as DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/011797ar its flow has been continuous with limited, but eye-opening, disruptions such as the First Energy Crisis is 1973. Petroleum supplies are virtually taken for See table of contents granted. Since approximately two-thirds of the world’s petroleum production is shipped by sea, there are inherent distribution constraints, which require navigating through straits and passages; chokepoints of maritime circulation. This paper presents an overview of the geography of oil supply and demand, Publisher(s) and the strategic issues that are linked to its maritime circulation. Chokepoints Département de géographie are perceived as resources, the value of which varies according to degree of use. As the era of petroleum domination draws to a close, the importance and vulnerability of strategic passages will increase. Their ability to handle ISSN additional traffic appears to be limited, implying that future energy crises or 0007-9766 (print) oil shortages are more likely to be attributable to the challenges of distribution. 1708-8968 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article Rodrigue, J.-P. (2004). Straits, Passages and Chokepoints: A Maritime Geostrategy of Petroleum Distribution.
    [Show full text]
  • Quel Avenir Pour Les Grands Canaux Maritimes ?
    ASSOCIATION DU SOUVENIR DE FERDINAND DE LESSEPS ET DU CANAL DE SUEZ Quel avenir pour les grands canaux maritimes ? Bulletin n° 2 Janvier 2017 3 Sous le haut patronage de Monsieur Alain JUPPÉ, maire de BORDEAUX, QUEL AVENIR POUR LES GRANDS CANAUX MARITIMES ? Bibliothèque de Bordeaux Mériadeck. Colloque de Bordeaux sous la présidence d’Arnaud Ramière de Fortanier 10 juin 2016. Organisation : Gabriel de Bérard, Thierry Chambolle Logistique : Madeleine de Bérard Reportage photographique : Béatrice Barraud 4 Sous le haut patronage de Monsieur Alain JUPPÉ, maire de BORDEAUX, 5 QUEL AVENIR POUR LES GRANDS CANAUX MARITIMES ? Bibliothèque de Bordeaux Mériadeck. Sommaire Bienvenue par Gabriel de Bérard ........................................................................................................7 Accueil par la Mairie de Bordeaux ......................................................................................................9 Ouverture du colloque par Arnaud Ramière de Fortanier .............................................................11 Interventions S.E Madame Pilar de Aleman ............................................................................................................13 Madame Nivine Khaled ......................................................................................................................19 Monsieur Arnaud Ramière de Fortanier ...........................................................................................25 Professeur Hubert Bonin ....................................................................................................................29
    [Show full text]
  • The 1956 Suez Crisis
    ch6.qxd 1/28/98 9:08 AM Page 135 CHAPTER 6 The 1956 Suez Crisis On July 26, 1956, Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser nationalized the Suez Canal. The ostensible reason for the nationalization was to use the tolls to ‹nance the building of the Aswan Dam. Nasser’s action was an act of revenge against the British and the French, who had previously held control of the company that controlled the Canal. This con›ict precipi- tated an international crisis over ownership and operation of the Suez Canal. The French and British were immediately thrust into the domain of losses by the nationalization of the Canal. The British had recently with- drawn 90,000 troops from the area on June 13, in response to strong American pressure.1 The French were having trouble with their colonials in Algeria. Both countries saw the seizure of the Canal as prelude to the complete loss of their colonial positions in the African and Asian worlds. Eisenhower’s perspective during the Suez crisis stands in stark contrast to the Europeans’, at least partly because America had different goals and stakes in the Canal than did the British and French. Eisenhower was in a relative domain of gains, unlike the British and French, who were both operating in domains of loss. According to the predictions offered by prospect theory, this should encourage Eisenhower to make relatively risk- averse decisions as opposed to British and French decisions, which were more likely to be risk seeking in nature. At the time of the Suez crisis, the United States had the military power to force its will on Egypt, and yet Eisenhower chose not to do so.
    [Show full text]
  • The Suez Crisis: a Brief Comint History
    TOP SECRET united states cryptologic history The Suez Crisis: A BriefComint History (U) DECLASSIFIED UNDER AUTHORITY OF THE INTERAGENCY SECURITY CLASSIFICATION APPEALS PANEL, E.0.13526, SECTION 5.3(b)(3) ISCAP APPEAL NO. 2013-117, document no.1 DECLASSIFICATION DATE: March 05, 2018 THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CODEWORD MATERIAL NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS Cl.assified By NSA/CSSM 123-2 Oeclassify.011: Origmating Agency's Determination Req1.ured TePSECRET ... II Contents of this publication should not i,e reproduced, or further disseminated outside the U.S. Intelligence Community without the permiulon of the Director. NSA/CSS. Inquiries about reproduction and dissemination shouldbe directed to the Oftice ofCryptologic Archives and History, T54. r 'fOP SECRET UMBRA UNITED STATES CRYPTOLOGIC HIS.TORY Special Series Crisis Collection Volume2 The Suez Crisis: A BriefComint History (U) Withheld from public release under the National Security Act of 1959, 50 U.S.C. 3605 (P.L. 86-36) OFFICE OF ARCHIVES AND HISTORY NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL SECURITY SERV~CE 1988 T-OP SECRH UMBRA , NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS .a UNCLASSIFIED TableofContents Page Foreword -;...·-·-·------------------·-··---·-----------------·-----·--------- v Background ---------····--------···-------·····------------------------···-· 1 The Rise ofNasser ------------------------~-----·----------·-------------------· 3 A Search for Weapons ------"".·------...:---·-----------------·---- 4 TheSoviet Factor ---------------------·-----·-------------------------- 8 Soviet
    [Show full text]
  • The Suez Company's Concession in Egypt, 1854-1956: Modern Infrastructure and Local Economic Development
    The Suez Company's Concession in Egypt, 1854-1956: Modern Infrastructure and Local Economic Development Caroline Piquet Enterprise & Society, Volume 5, Number 1, March 2004, pp. 107-127 (Article) Published by Cambridge University Press For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/53850 Access provided by University of Chicago (6 Jun 2017 19:33 GMT) Khh005.fm Page 107 Tuesday, February 17, 2004 9:55 AM The Suez Company’s Concession in Egypt, 1854–1956: Modern Infrastructure and Local Economic Development CAROLINE PIQUET For over a century in Egypt, the Suez Canal Company reflected the role of the concession in European economic expansion overseas. Concession was a European business practice widespread in Egypt; it was an institution inherited from a system of privileges for Europeans since the Middle Ages. It promised a way for Egypt to adopt modern infrastructures and receive needed European help for digging the canal. The results of the Suez Company are indis- putable: the desert of the Suez Isthmus became a lively economic region with active ports, growing cities, and an expanding labor force. And the region was linked to the rest of the country by a new road network. At the same time, however, the concession sys- tem denied Egypt full benefit of this infrastructure. The canal served the financial and strategic interests of the company, not the interests of the local economy. This outcome embodied all the contradictions of the concession system: on the one hand, conces- sions were a necessity for modern infrastructure development in Egypt; on the other, they were a hindrance to further national eco- nomic development.
    [Show full text]
  • Suez Canal Salvage Operations in 1974
    Description of document: US Navy Salvage Report: Suez Canal Salvage Operations in 1974 Requested date: 20-December-2007 Released date: 17-December-2008 Posted date: 05-May-2009 Title of document Suez Canal Salvage Operations in 1974 Source of document: Department of the Navy Naval Sea Systems Command [email protected] The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website. FOREWORD On 5 June 1975 the Suez C anal will again be open to the ships of the world for the first time since its closure during the 1967 Six-Day War, when ten ships were scuttled by Egyptian forces to close this important waterway to ocean going shipping.
    [Show full text]
  • Andrej DÁVID1 WILL the POLITICAL CRISIS IN
    Sea transport, Suez Canal, Suezmax ships, sea routes, closing of the canal, political crisis Andrej DÁVID 1 WILL THE POLITICAL CRISIS IN EGYPT THREATEN SEA TRANSPORT? The Suez Canal which was built due to the reduction of the transit distance between the North Atlantic and the Indian Ocean lies on one of the most important sea routes in the world. It has been rebuilt for several times just as ships have grown in size and capacity over the years. Suezmax ships are the maximum-sized tankers or container ships which can sail through the canal. Their deadweight is from 125 000 to 240 000 tons. Since its opening in 1869 it has been closed twice due to two war conflicts (the Suez Crisis and the Six-Day War). The closures influenced the direction of transport flows in sea transport and the size and capacity of ships. OHROZÍ POLITICKÁ KRÍZA V EGYPTE NÁMORNÚ PLAVBU? Suezský prieplav, ktorý bol postavený kvôli skráteniu prepravných vzdialeností medzi severným Atlantikom a Indickým oceánom leží na jednej z najdôležitejších prepravných trás sveta. Prieplav bol prestavaný nieko ľko krát, tak ako námorné lode zvä čšovali svoje parametre a prepravnú kapacitu v priebehu rokov. Ich hrubá nosnos ť je od 125 tis. do 240 tis. ton. Od svojho otvorenia v roku 1869 bol dvakrát uzavretý kvôli dvom vojenským konfliktom (Suezská kríza a Šes ťdňová vojna). Tieto uzavretia vplývali na zmenu smerovania prepravných prúdov v námornej doprave, ve ľkos ť a kapacitu námorných lodí. 1. INTRODUCTION The Suez Canal lies on one of the most important sea routes in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • AM 2. Designing New Homes for Ageing Well
    2. Designing new homes for ageing well #HLINconf19 DesigningAge new-friendly homes housing for ageing well Housing LIN conference, 20 March 2019 Julia Park Architect and Head of Housing Research, Levitt Bernstein ©Tim Crocker About Levitt Bernstein Multi-disciplinary, design-led practice established 50 years ago 130 staff in studios in London and Manchester Urban design Architecture Landscape Interior design Research Changing demographics Three main aims • Consider how UK design has moved on since the first HAPPI report • Provide practical, forward-looking design guidance • Take the debate about how to live well as we live longer to the next stage. ©Copenhagen Municipality Contents 1. Introduction 2. Approaching a new project 3. The value of shared space 4. The importance of home 5. Responding to a changing world 6. Conclusion Case studies ©Jacob Birgens/JJW Arkitekter What is an ‘older person’? ©Pollard Thomas Edwards ©Mungo Park Important step forward in Building Regs, 2015 Category 1 68m2 Category 2 70m2 Category 3 87m2 One-off bespoke design, Northumberland ‘Shawm House’, Mason Kerr for private clients ©Rob Rhodes Family house with granny annex Barratt competition entry, Levitt Bernstein Co-housing, North Barnet ‘New Ground’, Pollard Thomas Edwards for OWCH with Hanover ©Tim Crocker Bungalows, Greenwich Bell Phillips Architects for Royal Borough of Greenwich ©Edmund Sumner Multi-cultural, multi-generational living, Clapton Common ‘Lime Tree Court’, Levitt Bernstein for Hanover, Agudas Israel HA and Hill ©Tim Crocker Extra care, Lewisham
    [Show full text]