DOCSLIB.ORG

Junction 9 Improvement Scheme Preliminary Environmental Information Report May 2021 M3 Junction 9 Improvement Preliminary Environmental Information Report (PEIR)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Junction 9 Improvement Scheme Preliminary Environmental Information Report May 2021 M3 Junction 9 Improvement Preliminary Environmental Information Report (PEIR) M3 junction 9 improvement scheme Preliminary Environmental Information Report May 2021 M3 Junction 9 Improvement Preliminary Environmental Information Report (PEIR) Contents 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1-1 Background ................................................................................................................ 1-1 Planning history .......................................................................................................... 1-1 Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) ................................................................... 1-3 The decision maker and planning policy .................................................................... 1-3 Purpose of this PEIR .................................................................................................. 1-4 Structure and content of this PEIR ............................................................................. 1-4 Availability of this PEIR .............................................................................................. 1-5 Consultation ................................................................................................................ 1-6 2 The Proposed Scheme............................................................................................................. 2-1 Need for the Proposed Scheme ................................................................................. 2-1 Proposed Scheme objectives ..................................................................................... 2-1 Proposed Scheme location ........................................................................................ 2-2 Proposed Scheme description ................................................................................... 2-3 3 Consideration of alternatives .................................................................................................. 3-1 EIA Regulations .......................................................................................................... 3-1 Historic consideration of alternatives.......................................................................... 3-1 Summary of on-going design work and consideration of alternatives ........................ 3-6 4 Environmental impact assessment methodology ................................................................ 4-1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 4-1 Surveys and predictive techniques and methods ....................................................... 4-1 Predicting environmental impacts ............................................................................... 4-2 Evaluating significance ............................................................................................... 4-2 Embedded and essential mitigation ........................................................................... 4-6 The Rochdale Envelope ............................................................................................. 4-6 Monitoring of significant residual effects .................................................................... 4-7 Reporting .................................................................................................................... 4-7 Scoped in effects ........................................................................................................ 4-8 Competent experts ..................................................................................................... 4-8 Constraints and limitations ......................................................................................... 4-8 Risk of major accidents and/or disasters.................................................................... 4-8 Cumulative effects .................................................................................................... 4-10 5 Air Quality ................................................................................................................................. 5-1 5.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 5-1 5.2 Legislative and policy framework ............................................................................... 5-1 5.3 Consultation ................................................................................................................ 5-2 5.4 Assessment methodology and significance criteria ................................................... 5-7 5.5 Assessment assumptions and limitations................................................................. 5-14 HE551511-VFK-EGN-X_XXXX_XX-TN-LE-0004 Revision P07 May 2021 M3 Junction 9 Improvement Preliminary Environmental Information Report (PEIR) 5.6 Study area ................................................................................................................ 5-15 5.7 Baseline conditions................................................................................................... 5-16 5.8 Design, mitigation and enhancement measures ...................................................... 5-23 5.9 Assessment of potential effects ................................................................................ 5-24 5.10 Anticipated further assessment ................................................................................ 5-27 6 Cultural Heritage ...................................................................................................................... 6-1 6.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 6-1 6.2 Legislative and policy framework ............................................................................... 6-2 6.3 Consultation ................................................................................................................ 6-3 6.4 Assessment methodology and significance criteria ................................................. 6-13 6.5 Assessment assumptions and limitations................................................................. 6-22 6.6 Baseline conditions................................................................................................... 6-22 6.7 Design, mitigation and enhancement measures ...................................................... 6-33 6.8 Assessment of potential effects ................................................................................ 6-34 6.9 Anticipated further assessment ................................................................................ 6-46 7 Landscape and Visual.............................................................................................................. 7-1 7.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 7-1 7.2 Legislative and policy framework ............................................................................... 7-2 7.3 Consultation ................................................................................................................ 7-3 7.4 Assessment methodology and significance criteria ................................................. 7-17 7.5 Assessment assumptions and limitations................................................................. 7-27 7.6 Study area ................................................................................................................ 7-27 7.7 Baseline conditions................................................................................................... 7-29 7.8 Design, mitigation and enhancement measures ...................................................... 7-40 7.9 Assessment of potential effects ................................................................................ 7-43 7.10 Anticipated further assessment ................................................................................ 7-56 8 Biodiversity ............................................................................................................................... 8-1 8.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 8-1 8.2 Legislative and policy framework ............................................................................... 8-1 8.3 Consultation ................................................................................................................ 8-4 8.4 Assessment methodology and significance criteria ................................................. 8-16 8.5 Assessment assumptions and limitations................................................................. 8-22 8.6 Study area ................................................................................................................ 8-23 8.7 Baseline conditions................................................................................................... 8-24 8.8 Design, mitigation and enhancement measures ...................................................... 8-43 8.9 Assessment of potential effects ................................................................................ 8-46 8.10 Anticipated further assessment ................................................................................ 8-59 9 Geology and Soils ...................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Ramblers' Association Working for Walkers
    Portsmouth Group Summer - Autumn (July – October 2018) Walks Programme The Ramblers' Association Working for Walkers The RA promotes rambling, protects Rights of Way, campaigns for access to open country and defends the beauty of the countryside Web site: Head office www.ramblers.org.uk Local http://www.portsmouthramblers.org.uk/ Email: Head office [email protected] Local Local [email protected] PORTSMOUTH GROUP WALKING PROGRAMME Correct as at 30th MAY 2018. Check the website for any updates. The Portsmouth Group offers a variety of walks mainly in Hampshire, West Sussex and the Isle of Wight. On Saturdays these are moderately paced 5 to 9 mile walks whilst, on Sundays, they are faster paced 11 to 15 mile walks. The Group also has short Friday evening walks and some extra Saturday walks in more distant parts in the summer months. Most walks have a pub/cafe stop either at the end or at lunch time. New walkers always welcome. Just turn up at meeting place for shorter walks. For walks in excess of 10 miles, please contact leader first if you have not previously walked this distance. Grade A walks – for experienced walkers; brisk pace Grade B walks – regular pace Grade C walks – moderate pace Grade D walks – slow pace These are only general indications of the pace and will vary with the individual leader. Portsmouth Group Summer - Autumn (July - October 2018) Programme Page 2 Never rely on this printed programme. Check the Portsmouth Ramblers website for any changes. CAR SHARING AND LIFTS– IMPORTANT INFORMATION Our group encourages car sharing as well as assisting those without transport and those with transport but who lack confidence driving to unfamiliar areas to get to the walks.
    [Show full text]
  • Listed Building and Conservation Area) Act 1990
    Town and Country Planning Acts 1990 Planning (Listed Building and Conservation Area) Act 1990 LIST OF NEW PLANNING AND OTHER APPLICATIONS, RECEIVED AND VALID IN PARISH/TOWN WARD ORDER WEEKLY LIST AS AT 20 June 2021 For Guidance 1 Those applications which have a star by them are FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. Please see over for a list and description of application types. 2 If the Grid Reference is blank, this is because it is a property which is in the process of being entered on the Property Database for the District. 3 The Conservation Area only appears where the application is known to be in a Conservation Area . 4 Where the application has not been allocated to a case officer, “Team Manager “ for the relevant area appears instead. 5 The Publicity Period is 21 days after the Site Notice Date or 21 days after a Press Advert date, where this has been made, whichever is the later. Applications may be determined after this date. If you require any further information, please enquire at Main Reception, City Offices, Colebrook Street, Winchester, SO23 9LJ quoting the Case Number. We will then be able to give you the current status of the application. We are open Monday to Thursday 8.30am - 5.00pm, Fridays 8.30am - 4.30pm, excluding Bank and Public Holidays. Page 1 APPLICATION CODES AND DESCRIPTION AVC Full Advert Consent AVT Temporary Advert Consent (non-standard time limit) AGA Agricultural Application APN Agricultural Prior Notification CER Certificate of Alternative Use CHU Change of Use DEC Demolition Consultation EUC Established Use
    [Show full text]
  • Worthy Walk 6 : a Walk in the Park the Walk This Time Is Written with People Pushing Buggies in Mind; It Starts and Ends by the School
    Worthy Walk 6 : A Walk in the Park The walk this time is written with people pushing buggies in mind; it starts and ends by the school. The walk is entirely on surfaced paths. Total length is just over 1.5 miles but could be shortened or lengthened at your discretion. Broadview 4 5 Mosaic at Broadview – showing the Woodhams 3 Farm Roman Villa 2 Primary School 6 8 START: 1 Top of Church Lane 7 Ordnance Survey mapping © Crown copyright Media 022/11 Kingsworthy House Worthy Walk 6 : A walk in the Park 1. Start at the Nations Hill end of the footpath that 5. When you reach Lovedon Lane turn right, over the runs beside the school fence and head towards old railway bridge and down to the Basingstoke Eversley Park. This path follows the line of the old Road. To the left the row of fir trees show the line of pack horse route known as the Whiteway, on the old railway which goes under the A33 and to account of its chalk surface. This led from Alresford via Itchen Abbas. Attempts are being made Winchester to Basingstoke and was an important to clear parts of the line for use as footpaths and route until it was usurped by the opening of the cycle routes – if this interests you, find out more by Turnpike road from Popham to Winchester in about contacting County Councillor Jackie Porter, 1760. [email protected]. 2. Once in Eversley Park go past the play area and 6. As you approach the Basingstoke Road you will keep to the path beside the top hedge until you cut notice a large house straight ahead.
    [Show full text]
  • Kings Worthy 1 Byway 4851 3378 4812 3505 from Road C.95 at Hookpit Farm to Junction with No
    Information on Rights of Way in Hampshire including extracts from “The Hampshire Definitive Statement of Public Rights of Way” Prepared by the County Council under section 33(1) of the National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act 1949 and section 57(3) of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 The relevant date of this document is 15th December 2007 Published 1st January 2008 Notes: 1. Save as otherwise provided, the prefix SU applies to all grid references 2. The majority of the statements set out in column 5 were prepared between 1950 and 1964 and have not been revised save as provided by column 6 3. Paths numbered with the prefix ‘5’ were added to the definitive map after 1st January 1964 4. Paths numbered with the prefix ‘7’ were originally in an adjoining parish but have been affected by a diversion or parish boundary change since 1st January 1964 5. Paths numbered with the prefix ‘9’ were in an adjoining county on 1st January 1964 6. Columns 3 and 4 do not form part of the Definitive Statement and are included for information only Parish and Path No. Status Start Point (Grid End point (Grid Descriptions, Conditions and Limitations ref and ref and description) description) Kings Worthy 1 Byway 4851 3378 4812 3505 From Road C.95 at Hookpit Farm to Junction with No. 2 Open to All Road U173, BOAT 2 Traffic Hookpit Farm Lane From C.95 south westwards along gravel road to farm then along gravel road enclosed approximately 20ft. wide between hedges, under railway arch, then along earth track enclosed approximately 20ft.
    [Show full text]
  • Milestones & Waymarkers
    MILESTONES & WAYMARKERS The Journal of the Milestone Society incorporating On the Ground Volume Seven 2014 ISSN. 1479-5167 FREE TO MEMBERS OF THE MILESTONE SOCIETY MILESTONES & WAYMARKERS incorporating On the Ground Volume Seven 2014 MILESTONES & WAYMARKERS The Journal of the Milestone Society incorporating On the Ground Volume Seven 2014 The Milestone Society—Registered Charity No 1105688 ISSN 1479-5167 PRODUCTION TEAM John V Nicholls, 220 Woodland Avenue, Hutton, BRENTWOOD, Essex, CM13 1DA Email: [email protected] Supported by the Editorial Panel of Carol Haines, Mike Hallett, Keith Lawrence and David Viner MAIN CONTENTS INTRODUCTION This latest issue of one of the Society’s two principal Emergency Powers and the Milestones 3 publications in print marks ten years of publishing this A Cheshire milepost 6 Journal, now firmly established as an annual publication It happened at the milestone 7 and permanent place of record, especially as since 2011 The A34 – A Tribute to Ogilby? 11 it has incorporated the valuable On The Ground section, From the Archives previously published separately. Lost mileposts of the Middx & Essex Turnpike 12 Its seven issues between 2004 and 2010 together On the Ground 13 with seven issues of Milestones & Waymarkers since Scotland 2004 represents a significant archive, especially when 20 taken together with the Society’s six-monthly Newslet- ‘Crossing the Pennines’ Heritage Trail 21 ter, which by the turn of 2014/15 will have published 28 Milestones from Overseas issues since the very early days of the Society in 2001. Sri Lanka, Malta, New Zealand 22 Much has changed over that period, not least the Book Review: Moving Miles 26 growing use of the website to share new information and The Roehampton Mounting Block and ‘Milestone’ 27 increasingly to record activities.
    [Show full text]
  • M3 Junction 9 Improvement Scheme PCF Stage 2 – Report on Public Consultation
    M3 Junction 9 Improvement Scheme PCF Stage 2 – Report on Public Consultation March 2018 Registered office Bridge House, 1 Walnut Tree Close, Guildford, GU1 4LZ Highways England Company Limited registered in England and Wales number 09346363 M3 Junction 9 Improvement Scheme PCF Stage 2 – Report on Public Consultation M3 JUNCTION 9 IMPROVEMENT SCHEME PCF STAGE 2 (OPTION SELECTION) REPORT ON PUBLIC CONSULTATION Highways England Date: March 2018 Project no: 70015218 HE PIN: 551511 Prepared for: Highways England Bridge House Walnut Tree Close Guildford Surrey GU1 4LZ Mountbatten House Basing View Basingstoke RG21 4HJ Hampshire United Kingdom Tel: +44-(0) 1256 318800 www.wsp.com ii M3 Junction 9 Improvement Scheme PCF Stage 2 – Report on Public Consultation QUALITY MANAGEMENT ISSUE/REVISION FIRST ISSUE REVISION 1 REVISION 2 REVISION 3 SUITABILITY Remarks P01 Date March 2018 Carole Lehman / Prepared by Adam Webb Signature Checked by Duncan Brooks Signature Authorised by Pradeep Agrawal Signature PIN: HE551511 Project number WSP ref: 70015218 Report number HE551511-WSP-GEN-M3J9PCF2-RP-TR-00048 iii M3 Junction 9 Improvement Scheme PCF Stage 2 – Report on Public Consultation PRODUCTION TEAM CLIENT (HIGHWAYS ENGLAND) Major Projects Programme Lead Steve Hoesli Major Projects Senior Project Neil Andrew Manager Major Projects Project Manager Simon Hewett Senior User Representative Paul Benham WSP Tel: +44 (0)1684 851 751 RIS Area 3 Programme Director Steve O’Donnell RIS Area 3 Programme Manager Stuart Craig Tel: +44 (0)1256 318 660 Project Director Roland Diffey Tel: +44 (0)1256 318 777 Project Manager Pradeep Agrawal Tel: +44 (0)2031 169 090 iv M3 Junction 9 Improvement Scheme PCF Stage 2 – Report on Public Consultation TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ...................................................................................9 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Gazetteer.Doc Revised from 10/03/02
    Save No. 91 Printed 10/03/02 10:33 AM Gazetteer.doc Revised From 10/03/02 Gazetteer compiled by E J Wiseman Abbots Ann SU 3243 Bighton Lane Watercress Beds SU 5933 Abbotstone Down SU 5836 Bishop's Dyke SU 3405 Acres Down SU 2709 Bishopstoke SU 4619 Alice Holt Forest SU 8042 Bishops Sutton Watercress Beds SU 6031 Allbrook SU 4521 Bisterne SU 1400 Allington Lane Gravel Pit SU 4717 Bitterne (Southampton) SU 4413 Alresford Watercress Beds SU 5833 Bitterne Park (Southampton) SU 4414 Alresford Pond SU 5933 Black Bush SU 2515 Amberwood Inclosure SU 2013 Blackbushe Airfield SU 8059 Amery Farm Estate (Alton) SU 7240 Black Dam (Basingstoke) SU 6552 Ampfield SU 4023 Black Gutter Bottom SU 2016 Andover Airfield SU 3245 Blackmoor SU 7733 Anton valley SU 3740 Blackmoor Golf Course SU 7734 Arlebury Lake SU 5732 Black Point (Hayling Island) SZ 7599 Ashlett Creek SU 4603 Blashford Lakes SU 1507 Ashlett Mill Pond SU 4603 Blendworth SU 7113 Ashley Farm (Stockbridge) SU 3730 Bordon SU 8035 Ashley Manor (Stockbridge) SU 3830 Bossington SU 3331 Ashley Walk SU 2014 Botley Wood SU 5410 Ashley Warren SU 4956 Bourley Reservoir SU 8250 Ashmansworth SU 4157 Boveridge SU 0714 Ashurst SU 3310 Braishfield SU 3725 Ash Vale Gravel Pit SU 8853 Brambridge SU 4622 Avington SU 5332 Bramley Camp SU 6559 Avon Castle SU 1303 Bramshaw Wood SU 2516 Avon Causeway SZ 1497 Bramshill (Warren Heath) SU 7759 Avon Tyrrell SZ 1499 Bramshill Common SU 7562 Backley Plain SU 2106 Bramshill Police College Lake SU 7560 Baddesley Common SU 3921 Bramshill Rubbish Tip SU 7561 Badnam Creek (River
    [Show full text]
  • The Winnallwinnall
    TheThe WinnallWinnall CommunityCommunity PlanPlan 1 Foreword This report presents the culmination of 4 years of work to identify the good points and bad points that make Winnall the place it is and what the people who live here really think about the place. There is a lot to like about Winnall, but there are always things to be improved. We spoke to the residents in person and undertook a questionnaire, we spoke to young and old Winnall residents in special consultations to try and find out as much as we could about what they felt needed to be fixed and what could be improved. There were plenty of suggestions. One significant thing we learned about Winnall was actually how good it is. While the residents who responded to questions were able to identify a number of problems and problems areas, this should not detract from the low crime rate, the large number of facilities and the excellent com- munity spirit. The questionnaire showed a large number of people who spent many years, indeed decades, in Winnall. Of the respondents who made a comment, one simply wrote “A great place to live!” That is not to say there isn't a lot to do, and that is the real purpose of the community plan. The best way of finding out what the problems are is to go to the people who know about them, and while everyone may have their own opinion, there are certainly a lot of problems that are shared by a large number of people. Transport featured regularly as did parking and queues on main routes to the motorway were considered a major problem in Winnall.
    [Show full text]
  • Landowner Deposits Register
    Register of Landowner Deposits under Highways Act 1980 and Commons Act 2006 The first part of this register contains entries for all CA16 combined deposits received since 1st October 2013, and these all have scanned copies of the deposits attached. The second part of the register lists entries for deposits made before 1st October 2013, all made under section 31(6) of the Highways Act 1980. There are a large number of these, and the only details given here currently are the name of the land, the parish and the date of the deposit. We will be adding fuller details and scanned documents to these entries over time. List of deposits made - last update 12 January 2017 CA16 Combined Deposits Deposit Reference: 44 - Land at Froyle (The Mrs Bootle-Wilbrahams Will Trust) Link to Documents: http://documents.hants.gov.uk/countryside/Deposit44-Bootle-WilbrahamsTrustLand-Froyle-Scan.pdf Details of Depositor Details of Land Crispin Mahony of Savills on behalf of The Parish: Froyle Mrs Bootle-WilbrahamWill Trust, c/o Savills (UK) Froyle Jewry Chambers,44 Jewry Street, Winchester Alton Hampshire Hampshire SO23 8RW GU34 4DD Date of Statement: 14/11/2016 Grid Reference: 733.416 Deposit Reference: 98 - Tower Hill, Dummer Link to Documents: http://documents.hants.gov.uk/rightsofway/Deposit98-LandatTowerHill-Dummer-Scan.pdf Details of Depositor Details of Land Jamie Adams & Madeline Hutton Parish: Dummer 65 Elm Bank Gardens, Up Street Barnes, Dummer London Basingstoke SW13 0NX RG25 2AL Date of Statement: 27/08/2014 Grid Reference: 583. 458 Deposit Reference:
    [Show full text]
  • View Characterisation and Analysis
    South Downs National Park: View Characterisation and Analysis Final Report Prepared by LUC on behalf of the South Downs National Park Authority November 2015 Project Title: 6298 SDNP View Characterisation and Analysis Client: South Downs National Park Authority Version Date Version Details Prepared by Checked by Approved by Director V1 12/8/15 Draft report R Knight, R R Knight K Ahern Swann V2 9/9/15 Final report R Knight, R R Knight K Ahern Swann V3 4/11/15 Minor changes to final R Knight, R R Knight K Ahern report Swann South Downs National Park: View Characterisation and Analysis Final Report Prepared by LUC on behalf of the South Downs National Park Authority November 2015 Planning & EIA LUC LONDON Offices also in: Land Use Consultants Ltd Registered in England Design 43 Chalton Street London Registered number: 2549296 Landscape Planning London Bristol Registered Office: Landscape Management NW1 1JD Glasgow 43 Chalton Street Ecology T +44 (0)20 7383 5784 Edinburgh London NW1 1JD Mapping & Visualisation [email protected] FS 566056 EMS 566057 LUC uses 100% recycled paper LUC BRISTOL 12th Floor Colston Tower Colston Street Bristol BS1 4XE T +44 (0)117 929 1997 [email protected] LUC GLASGOW 37 Otago Street Glasgow G12 8JJ T +44 (0)141 334 9595 [email protected] LUC EDINBURGH 28 Stafford Street Edinburgh EH3 7BD T +44 (0)131 202 1616 [email protected] Contents 1 Introduction 1 Background to the study 1 Aims and purpose 1 Outputs and uses 1 2 View patterns, representative views and visual sensitivity 4 Introduction 4 View
    [Show full text]
  • An Improved Backcalculation Method to Predict Flexible
    AN IMPROVED BACKCALCULATION METHOD TO PREDICT FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT LAYERS MODULI AND BONDING CONDITION BETWEEN WEARING COURSE AND BASE COURSE by BACHAR AL HAKIM BSc, MSc, MASCE, MIHT A thesis submitted to Liverpool John Moores University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Liverpool John Moores University School of the Built Environment Liverpool United Kingdom. April 1997. This thesis is dedicated to the souls of my mum and my twin brother, whom I lost during this research period. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author wishes to express his sincere appreciation to Dr H. Al-Nageim, Professor L. Lesley and Mr D. Morley under whose supervision this research project was conducted. Sincere thanks are due to Dr D. Pountney for his advice concerning the mathematical, statistical and computer works. A special thank is also extended to Professor D. Jagger, the School Deputy Director for Research and Developments for his help and support. The author acknowledges the co-operation of Cheshire County Council for permission of access to the A34 road pavements, University of Ulster for the Nottingham Asphalt Tester provision and SWK Pavement Engineering Limited for providing the A41 pavement results for analysis. Researchers, staff and technicians of the School of the Built Environment are thanked for their friendship and help. Finally the author wishes to dedicate this thesis to his parents, his wife and his son for their understanding, love and moral support. ABSTRACT The aim of this research project is to develop an improved backcalculation procedure, for the determination of flexible pavement properties from the Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) test results. The conventional backcalculation methods estimate the pavement layer moduli assuming full adhesion exists between layers in the analysis process.
    [Show full text]
  • Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation Sincs Hampshire.Pdf
    Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINCs) within Hampshire © Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre No part of this documentHBIC may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recoding or otherwise without the prior permission of the Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre Central Grid SINC Ref District SINC Name Ref. SINC Criteria Area (ha) BD0001 Basingstoke & Deane Straits Copse, St. Mary Bourne SU38905040 1A 2.14 BD0002 Basingstoke & Deane Lee's Wood SU39005080 1A 1.99 BD0003 Basingstoke & Deane Great Wallop Hill Copse SU39005200 1A/1B 21.07 BD0004 Basingstoke & Deane Hackwood Copse SU39504950 1A 11.74 BD0005 Basingstoke & Deane Stokehill Farm Down SU39605130 2A 4.02 BD0006 Basingstoke & Deane Juniper Rough SU39605289 2D 1.16 BD0007 Basingstoke & Deane Leafy Grove Copse SU39685080 1A 1.83 BD0008 Basingstoke & Deane Trinley Wood SU39804900 1A 6.58 BD0009 Basingstoke & Deane East Woodhay Down SU39806040 2A 29.57 BD0010 Basingstoke & Deane Ten Acre Brow (East) SU39965580 1A 0.55 BD0011 Basingstoke & Deane Berries Copse SU40106240 1A 2.93 BD0012 Basingstoke & Deane Sidley Wood North SU40305590 1A 3.63 BD0013 Basingstoke & Deane The Oaks Grassland SU40405920 2A 1.12 BD0014 Basingstoke & Deane Sidley Wood South SU40505520 1B 1.87 BD0015 Basingstoke & Deane West Of Codley Copse SU40505680 2D/6A 0.68 BD0016 Basingstoke & Deane Hitchen Copse SU40505850 1A 13.91 BD0017 Basingstoke & Deane Pilot Hill: Field To The South-East SU40505900 2A/6A 4.62
    [Show full text]