DOCSLIB.ORG

Master Plan Comprehensive Amendment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Master Plan Comprehensive Amendment City of Laurel Master Plan Comprehensive Amendment ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF LAUREL NOVEMBER 26, 2007 – ORDINANCE NO. 1572 AMENDED SEPTEMBER 28, 2009 – ORDINANCE NO. 1647 8103 SANDY SPRING ROAD LAUREL, MARYLAND CITY OF LAUREL Mayor: Craig A. Moe City Council: Frederick Smalls, President Michael R. Leszcz Janis L. Robinson Gayle Snyder Michael B. Sarich In Conjunction With the Planning Commission C. Michael Walls, Chairman Frederick Smalls, Council President Peggy N. Anderson John R. Kish Donald E. Williford A. Scott Kluckhuhn And the Master Plan Review Committee C. Michael Walls, Chairman Faith C. Calhoun Douglas Hayes Steve Meyerer Toni Drake Chony Davis-Johnson G. Rick Wilson Date: November 26, 2007 1 ABSTRACT Title City of Laurel Master Plan Author: Department of Community Planning & Business Services Subject: Master Plan for the City of Laurel. Elements include land use, environmental, recreation, housing, transportation, community facilities, economics, and implementation. Date: November 26, 2007 Abstract: This document sets forth recommendations for the future development and growth of the City. Specific recommendations are made for the many elements integral to the functioning of the City including land use proposals, transportation concerns, capital improvements and the physical and living environments. The focus of the document is to provide a long- range plan for the retention of the traditional characteristics of Laurel with the integration of future land use development. 2 ORDINANCE NO. 1572 AN ORDINANCE TO APPROVE AND ADOPT A MASTER PLAN FOR THE CITY OF LAUREL Sponsored by the President at the request of the Administration. WHEREAS, the City of Laurel Planning Commission (hereinafter "the Com- mission") was charged pursuant to Article 66B, Section 3.05, Annotated Code of Maryland, to make and approve a proposed Master Plan (hereinafter "the Plan") and to thereafter recommend the same to the City Council of Laurel for adoption, the Plan to serve as a guide for public and private actions and decisions to insure the development of public and private property in appropriate relationships, including in such Plan any areas outside of its boundaries which, in the Commission's judgment, are related to the planning responsibilities of the Commission; and WHEREAS, the Plan was proposed with the assistance of a Master Plan Review Committee which held a number of public hearings and made recommendations regarding the Plan; and WHEREAS, in the preparation of the Plan, the Commission was required to make, and did make, careful and comprehensive surveys and studies of present conditions and future anticipated growth of the City of Laurel, with due regard to its relation to neighboring territory; and WHEREAS, the Plan was required to be and was made for the general purpose of guiding and accomplishing the coordinated, adjusted, and harmonious development of the City of Laurel and its environs which will, in accordance with present and future needs, best promote health, safety, morals, order, convenience, prosperity, and general welfare, as well as efficiency and economy in the process of development, including among other things, adequate provisions for traffic, the promotion of public safety, 3 adequate provision for light and air, conservation of natural resources, the prevention of environmental pollution, the promotion of the healthful and convenient distribution of population, the promotion of good civic design and arrangement, wise and efficient expenditure of public funds, and the adequate provision of public utilities and recreation facilities, and other public requirements; and WHEREAS, before recommending the adoption of the Plan, the Commission was required to, and did hold, at least one public hearing thereon, notice of the time and place of which having been given by one publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Laurel; and WHEREAS, at least 60 days prior to the public hearing held by the Commission, copies of the recommended Plan were referred to all adjoining planning jurisdictions and to all state and local jurisdictions that have responsibility for financing or constructing public improvements necessary to implement the Plan; and WHEREAS, the City of Laurel Planning Commission approved the Plan on September 11, 2007 by a majority of its membership, and did thereby recommend the Plan to the Mayor and City Council of Laurel for adoption; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the Plan and wishes to adopt the Plan, with certain modifications, a copy of the Plan being attached hereto as Attachment "A" and incorporated herein by reference. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ENACTED AND ORDAINED, by the Mayor and City Council of Laurel that the Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto as Attachment "A" and is incorporated herein by reference, be and the same is hereby approved and adopted as and for the 2007 Master Plan of the City of Laurel. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED AND ORDAINED, that this Ordinance shall take effect from the date of its adoption. 4 PASSED this 26th day of November, 2007 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 10 Background ................................................................................................................. 10 Legal Status ................................................................................................................. 11 Planning Area Boundary .............................................................................................. 11 II. PLAN PERSPECTIVE ................................................................................................. 13 History ......................................................................................................................... 13 Regional Location ........................................................................................................ 17 Natural Environment .................................................................................................... 20 III. POPULATION TRENDS AND CHARACTERISTICS .................................................. 23 Area Population Trends ............................................................................................... 23 Population Characteristics ........................................................................................... 27 Projected Population .................................................................................................... 33 IV. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................ 35 State Visions ................................................................................................................ 35 Planning Goals and Objectives .................................................................................... 47 General Goals ............................................................................................................. 48 Land Use ..................................................................................................................... 49 Historic Preservation .................................................................................................... 49 Municipal Growth ......................................................................................................... 50 Housing ....................................................................................................................... 51 Community Facilities .................................................................................................... 51 Water Resources ......................................................................................................... 52 Public Safety ................................................................................................................ 54 Transportation ............................................................................................................. 55 Recreation ................................................................................................................... 56 Senior Citizens ............................................................................................................ 57 Sensitive Areas ............................................................................................................ 58 V. LAND USE ELEMENT ................................................................................................ 59 Overview...................................................................................................................... 59 Land Use Designations ................................................................................................ 66 Revitalization Overlay Areas ........................................................................................ 72 Mixed Use Transportation Oriented Development ........................................................ 76 Neighborhoods ............................................................................................................ 76 Special Study Areas .................................................................................................... 84 Route 1 – Washington Boulevard/Second Street Corridor ........................................... 84 Recommendations .................................................................................................... 86 Main Street
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sayers, Margery
    Sayers, Margery From: Melissa Annen <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 8:30 PM To: CouncilMail Subject: CR 111 Vote No"! As a Howard County resident who lives and drives this area daily, I do not want Howard County to help fund a railroad station and two parking garages and other infrastructure for the ill-conceived development which will bring 1000 residential units and about 800,000 sq. ft of commercial and office space to Route 1 at the Howard entrance to the Laurel Race track. The traffic nightmares will be intolerable! The City of Laurel train station is only 2500 feet away. Why should we fund this for the developer??? It will do nothing to help improve the traffic in that area, only cause MORE traffic. Please vote NO!!!! Melissa Annen Savage/ MD Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android Sayers, Margery From: Donald Campbell <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 8:40 PM To: CouncilMail Subject: Parking garages and railroad station > Dear Howard County Council, > > I am writing this email to let you know that I vote no on CR111.1 do > not believe that Howard County should continue to fund developers on > building things such as a Rail Station and 2 new Parking garages. > Someone up there really needs to learn how to say no to some things. I > feel and urge you all to table this bill. > > Thanks for your time in this matter! > > Myra Phelps > 8808 Baltimore Street > Savage, Maryland 20763 Sayers, Margery From: Donald Campbell <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 8:57 PM To: CouncilMail Subject: Railroad station and Parking garages Dear County Council, I am writing to info you that I vote NO on CR 111.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 ANNUAL REPORT Boston 5 Middlesex Avenue, Suite 401 Somerville, MA 02145 T 617.684.1500 F 617.623.3601
    LOCATIONS CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS 1626 East Jefferson Street Rockville, MD 20852-4041 Scan this code t 301.998.8100 with your phone f 301.998.3700 to see more. Federal Realty Investment Trust Download the i-nigma app to REGIONAL OFFICES get started. POISED 2010 ANNUAL REPORT Boston 5 Middlesex Avenue, Suite 401 Somerville, MA 02145 t 617.684.1500 f 617.623.3601 Philadelphia 50 East Wynnewood Road, Suite 200 Wynnewood, PA 19096 t 610.896.5870 f 610.896.5876 San Jose 3055 Olin Avenue, Suite 2100 San Jose, CA 95128-2069 t 408.551.4600 f 408.551.4616 South Florida 7015 Beracasa Way, Suite 204 Boca Raton, FL 33433 t 561.347.6522 f 561.368.6223 federalrealty.com 98454_Cvr 1 3/10/11 3:02 PM THE SHOPS AT EASTGATE Chapel Hill, NC Lisa collaborates with Planimetron and HZDG on Federal Realty’s website and online leasing tools. It starts with the proper stance: a firm financial footing, the result of our prudent and thoughtful investment approach. Drawing on decades of experience, we target our efforts at owning, operating, developing, and redeveloping high-quality retail real estate, serving markets with dense BOARD OF TRUSTEES populations, strong household incomes, and high barriers to entry by competitors. We remain focused on the long term. It is precisely this poised, (TOP, FROM LEFT) Jon E. Bortz, Chairman and CEO, Pebblebrook Hotel Trust balanced approach that created a healthy balance sheet and one of the David W. Faeder, Managing Partner, Fountain Square Properties lowest costs of capital in the industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Dimensions Healthcare System Request for Proposals the State Of
    Dimensions Healthcare System Request for Proposals The State of Maryland and Prince George’s County have each enacted legislative policies that encourage the participation of locally- based and minority-owned businesses. I. DEFINITIONS 1.1 “Contractor” means the Offeror selected and contracted in accordance with sections 5.5 and 5.7 of this RFP to perform the work specified in Part IV of this RFP. 1.2 “Contract Manager” means the staff representative of the Oversight Committee designated in section 4.8 of this RFP who will oversee, on behalf of the Oversight Committee, the Project and the Contractor’s activities. 1.3 “Offeror” means an entity that submits a timely proposal in response to and in accordance with the terms of this RFP. 1.4 “Oversight Committee” or “Committee” means the committee created pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding between the State of Maryland and Prince George’s County described in section 2.2 of this RFP, to support and enhance the medical services provided by the health care facilities managed by Dimensions Healthcare System. 1.5 “Project” means the services described in Part IV of this RFP. 1.6 “Project Manager” means the individual representative of the Contractor designated in its proposal, pursuant to subsection 5.1.2 of this RFP, as responsible for management of the Project and the services described in Part IV of this RFP, and who serves as the primary point of contact for the Contractor regarding all tasks related to the engagement. 1.7 “Project Coordinator” means the representative or representatives of Dimensions Healthcare System identified in section 4.8 of this RFP who are responsible for on-site, day-to-day project coordination with the Contractor.
    [Show full text]
  • 3,077 Sq Ft 2Nd Generation Restaurant Space 14708 Baltimore Avenue Laurel, Md 20707
    3,077 SQ FT 2ND GENERATION RESTAURANT SPACE 14708 BALTIMORE AVENUE LAUREL, MD 20707 LOCAL & REGIONAL LEASING BY: ANOTHER PROPERTY Space Highlights: • 3,077 sf 2nd generation restaurant space • Outdoor patio seating 3,077 SF • Adjacent to Regal Cinemas, a multitude of AVAILABLE shopping and dining destinations, and 1,414 luxury apartments (“Evolution”) • Within 1.5 miles from the University of Maryland Laurel Medical Center Center Overview: Join: • Towne Centre at Laurel is a 392,500 • Over 37,000 vehicles per day on square foot mixed-use shopping Baltimore Avenue, providing a major Welcome center offering various retail thoroughfare between College Park shopping opportunities and multiple and North Laurel dining and entertainment options to Laurel’s • Anchored by Harris Teeter and • Convenient and well located Regal Cinemas, Towne Centre at community-oriented shopping center Laurel boasts national retailers that freshest at the intersection of Baltimore include Burlington, Old Navy, Ulta, Avenue and Cherry Lane, providing Party City, Mattress Warehouse, destination... easy access to I-95, Route 32 and Carter’s, Panera Bread, Mission BBQ, 2 the Capital Beltway Outback Steakhouse, BJ’s & more! 3,077 SF 63 4TH ST 4 STORIES | 340 UNITS 3,077 SF AVAILABLE 20,2 CHE 35 RRY AADT LN 1 37,012 AADT 1 BALTIMORE AVE 4 4TH ST 4TH ST 612-CAR CAPACITY 4 STORIES 340 UNITS CHERRY LN 3,077 SF LAUREL LAKE CHERRY LN Fresh Green 1 BALTIMORE AVE 1 BALTIMORE AVE 5 NORTH LAUREL COMMUNITY CENTER WHISKEY BOTTOM RD SCOTCHTOWN HILLS ELEM. SCHOOL Russett Green LAUREL ELEM. SCHOOL LAUREL Laurel Shopping Center JR.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2017-2018
    EXCELLENCEANNUAL REPORT 2017–2018 IMPACT SUCCESS MESSAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2017–2018 PRESIDENT’S 2019–2021 Strategic Plan ....................................4 PATHWAYS Culinary Arts Center Opening ....................5 Prince George’s Community College now offers 10 academic Lanham Hall Opening ................................................6 pathways to degrees, certificates, Extension Centers ........................................................20 licensures, workforce trainings, and professional development. Financial Reports .......................................................... 28 Page 11 PGCC Foundation ..........................................................30 Grants ................................................................................................ 32 Donors .............................................................................................. 34 FRONT COVER Drs. Anthony T. Fulton and Thomisha M. Duru are two of the many faculty featured throughout the college in recognition of the great value and talent of our vast array of educators. MESSAGE PRESIDENT’S Prince George’s Community Their hard work and College (PGCC) had an exemplary dedication continue to receive year and set the tone for how the college honorable recognition, including receiving intends to support student success and address the highest rating on the Maryland State the region’s most pertinent needs. Thanks to the Department of Education 2018–2019 Maryland School leadership and collaborative efforts of our Board of Trustees, Report Card.
    [Show full text]
  • The Opportunity for a Renovated MARC Station at Laurel Race Track
    The Opportunity for a Renovated MARC Station at The Maryland Jockey Club at Laurel Park Presented by Mark Thompson 1/ST Properties 1 1/ST RACING: A NATIONAL PORTFOLIO OF TOP RACE TRACKS Properties Properties 1/ST RACING: COMPETITIVE STRATEGY 1/ST Racing provides… →Industry-leading, experiential entertainment →Modernized racing facilities →Cutting edge digital horse wagering 1/ST Properties develops… →Active entertainment communities that create synergy with our core business EXPERIENTIAL ENTERTAINMENT MODERN FACILITIES DIGITAL WAGERING Properties THE MARYLAND JOCKEY CLUB Pimlico / Laurel Park / Rosecroft / Bowie → Founded in 1743 → Presidents George Washington & Andrew Jackson were members → Owns the Preakness Stakes, Pimlico, Maryland Jockey Club at Laurel Park, Bowie Training Track, and Rosecroft Raceway → Owned & operated by The Stronach Group since 2007 → The Stronach Group is investing and growing racing in Maryland MARYLAND JOCKEY CLUB AT LAUREL PARK: Properties REGIONAL LOCATION Properties FACILITIES AND LAND HOLDINGS ACRES Total: 350 → Howard: 63 → Anne Arundel: 287 CLUBHOUSE → Built in 1911 → 412,000 SF OPERATIONS → Open Days: 362 → Racing Days: 168 → Training Days: 363 → MJC Employees: 440 → Backstretch Employees: 600-800 → Equine Athletes: 900+ Properties Scale One of the largest contiguous parcels in HoCo: → 63 Total Acres → 25 Acres of Open and Recreation Space Program Transit Oriented Development Zoning: → 1,000 Residential Units → 650,000 Square Feet of Commercial Uses → 127,000 Square Feet of Retail Uses Properties INITIAL
    [Show full text]
  • V. Prince George's County Retail Maps
    M-NCPPC LIST OF EXHIBITS I. EXISTING RETAIL PERFORMANCE Exhibit I-1 Historical Inventory by Type of Retail; Prince George’s County, MD; 2006-2014 QTD Exhibit I-2 Historical Absorption by Type of Retail; Prince George’s County, MD; 2006-2014 QTD Exhibit I-3 Historical Deliveries by Type of Retail; Prince George’s County, MD; 2006-2014 QTD Exhibit I-4 Historical Vacancy by Type of Retail; Prince George’s County, MD; 2006-2014 QTD Exhibit I-5 Major Shopping Center Openings and Absorption Pace; Prince George’s County, MD; 2006-2014 QTD Exhibit I-6 Super Regional/Regional Malls, Lifestyle, And Power Center Retail Occupancy Rate; Prince George’s County, MD; Washington, D.C., MSA; And Baltimore MSA; 2011-2014 QTD Exhibit I-7 Community And Neighborhood/Strip Center Retail Occupancy Rate; Prince George’s County, MD; Washington, D.C., MSA; And Baltimore MSA; 2011-2014 QTD Exhibit I-8 Super Regional/Regional Malls, Lifestyle, And Power Center Absorption as Percent of Occupied Space; Prince George’s County, MD; Washington, D.C., MSA; And Baltimore MSA; 2011-2014 QTD Exhibit I-9 Community And Neighborhood/Strip Center Absorption as Percent of Occupied Space; Prince George’s County, MD; Washington, D.C., MSA; And Baltimore MSA; 2011-2014 QTD Exhibit I-10 Super Regional and Regional Mall Locations and Current Property Statistics; Prince George’s County, MD; 2014 Exhibit I-11 Super Regional and Regional Malls - Inventory and Average Rental Rate; Prince George’s County, MD; 2006-2014 QTD Exhibit I-12 Super Regional and Regional Malls - Absorption, Deliveries,
    [Show full text]
  • KzgYgj\IzhihQ?PVT &
    M V ½A>83BA064)BA7jc^dc]ZVYiV`ZhVWZVi^c\dkZgYgj\iZhihq?PVT & 123 Years of Leadership in Higher Education www.nyack.edu/dc 202.220.1300 :IN;EB<:MBHGH? u PPP'P:LABG@MHGIHLM'<HF(>QIK>LLu L>IM>F;>K+2%+)).u --5A44++ Mankl]Zr *!()#()+7%.$)5470 -AYOR!NTHONY7ILLIAMSMAYNOTRUNAGAIN 1^fX]V>dc.DWhZgkZghhVn bVndghZiidgZkZVa]^heaVchq " BTT<^]bcTa):ajh^kZ\^Vci hfj^Y[^cVaanXVeijgZYdc[^abq 1d]ZTaBch[T) :bZg\ZcXn\ZVg id\ZindjgZVYn $%..)3#//+!0 ¼80<8==>24=C½)(OUSE-AJORITY,EADER4OM$E,AYSPEAKSTOTHEMEDIAAFTERBEINGINDICTEDONACONSPIRACYCHARGE$E,AYVEHEMENTLYDENIEDTHECHARGE [dgVcni]^c\q!& A^\P]RT 34;0H270A643 ;P]VdPVT) FZchkbmre^Z]^k[eZf^lbg]b\mf^gmhgÌ_ZgZmb\Íikhl^\nmhk Khggb^>Zke^%ma^=^fh\kZmb\ikhl^\nmhk bg:nlmbgpahe^]ma^bgo^lmb`Zmbhg%]^gb^] 7\f]gAUfh]bd[ F0B78=6C>=kAhnl^FZchkbmrE^Z]^kMhf Ghg^ma^e^ll%=^EZrÍlm^fihkZkr]^iZkmnk^ ihebmb\lpZlbgoheo^]'A^aZlghm^]ik^obhnl& 8daYeaVn^h^c =^EZrpZlbg]b\m^][rZM^qZl`kZg]cnkr Zg]ma^ikhli^\mh_Z\kbfbgZemkbZe_hkhg^h_ ermaZma^aZlikhl^\nm^]fZgr=^fh\kZml adkZ0Ydndj P^]g^l]ZrhgZ\aZk`^h_\hglibkbg`mhobh& ma^K^in[eb\ZglÍfhlmoblb[e^e^Z]^klk^o^k& bgma^iZlm' eZm^ihebmb\Ze_ng]kZblbg`eZpl%_hk\bg`abfmh [^kZm^]makhn`ahnmma^@HI&kng<hg`k^ll% =^EZr%.1%pZlbg]b\m^]hgZlbg`e^_^ehgr i]^c`i]Vi m^fihkZkberlm^iZlb]^_khfabl@HIihlm'A^ pab\apZlZek^Z]rlmkn``ebg`pbma^mab\l \hngmh_\hglibkbg`pbmamphihebmb\ZeZllh\b& bZVch]ZÉh blma^ab`a^lm&kZgdbg`f^f[^kh_<hg`k^ll jn^lmbhgllnkkhng]bg`bmlL^gZm^e^Z]^k' Zm^l'Ma^mphik^obhnleraZ][^^g\aZk`^]pbma mh_Z\^\kbfbgZeikhl^\nmbhg' K^in[eb\Zgljnb\derfho^]mh_beema^ ma^lZf^\hglibkZ\r\hngm'Ma^bg]b\mf^gm hVi^h[^ZY4 :]^_bZgm=^EZrlZb]a^aZ]]hg^ghmabg`
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Environmental Assessment for the James J
    Supplemental Environmental Assessment for the James J. Rowley Training Center Master Plan, 2017 Update November 2017 Prepared for Department of Homeland Security/ United States Secret Service JAMES J. ROWLEY TRAINING CENTER MASTER PLAN, 2017 UPDATE SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Responsible Agency: U.S. Secret Service Abstract: The U.S. Secret Service (USSS) has prepared this Supplemental Environmental Assessment (SEA) for the James J. Rowley Training Center (RTC) Master Plan 2017 Update, located in Prince George’s County, Maryland. The project includes the construction of new facilities, the renovation of existing facilities, the consolidation of facilities into precincts, infrastructure expansion, and security upgrades. This SEA considers the environmental effects of implementing a No Action (No Build) Alternative and an Action Alternative. For information concerning this document contact: Communications Center, SAF Attn: Thomas Franklin 245 Murray Lane, SW, Bldg. T-5 Washington, DC 20223 [email protected] Supplemental EA for the James J. Rowley Training Center Master Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Project Location ............................................................................................................................................................................ 2 Purpose and Need for the Action
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Metropolitan Area Transit, Commission
    WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT, COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. ORDER NO. 1138 IN THE MATTER OF: Served June P, 1971 Application of WMA Transit ) Application No. 671 Company for Permanent Authority ) to Operate Route X Between ) Docket No. 226 Laurel , Maryland and Washington, ) D. C. By Application No. 671, filed on December 17, 1970, WMA Transit Company (WMA) sought to amend its WMATC Certificate- of Public Convenience and Necessity No. 8 to add authority to operate between Laurel, Maryland and Washington, D. C. WMA proposed to operate one round trip each day over the following route: From Lau rel to Farra ut S oars Commencing at Cherry Lane and U. S. Highway Route I (Laurel Shopping Center), thence via U.S. Highway Route 1, Maryland State- Route 198, Irving Street, Maryland State Route 197 (Bowie-Laurel Road), Briar- croft Lane, Briarwood Road,.Contee Road, Maryland State Route 197, cut-off to southbound Baltimore- Washington Parkway, Baltimore Washington Parkway, Kenilworth Avenue, cut-off to East Capitol Street, East Capitol Street Bridge, C Street, N.E.; North Carolina Avenue, N.E.; Constitution Avenue, N.E.; 3rd Street, N.W.; C Street, S.W.; 6th Street, S.W.; D Street, S.W.; thru S,W. Bus Terminal, D Street, S'.W.; lath Street, S.W.; Independence Avenue, S.W.; 14th Street, S.W.; H Street, N.W.; Connecticut Avenue, N.W., to Terminal Stand south of Farragut Square. From_Farragut Square to Laurel Commencing at Terminal Stand on Connecticut Avenue south of Farragut Square, thence via Eye Street, N.W.; 14th Street, N.W.; Independence Avenue, S.W.;, 12th Street; S.W.; D Street, S.W.; thru S.W.
    [Show full text]
  • Second Five-Year Review Report, Tipton Airfield Parcel Report Dated April 2011
    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION III 1650 Arch Street . Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029 September 23,2011 Markus Craig Program Manager Office of the Assistant Chief of Staff for Installation Management; BRAC Division NC3 - Taylor Bldg 5064A 2530 Crystal Drive Arlington, VA 22202 Subject: Final 5-Year Review Report for Tipton Airfield Parcel. Mr. Craig: Thank you for the opportunity to review the subject document. The five-year review process involved reviewing the protectiveness of the Tipton Airfield Parcel. The Army prepared this report to address the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) Section 12l(c) five-year review requirements. EPA has reviewed this five-year review report and found it to be consistent with EPA's June, 2001 guidance document, Comprehensive Five Year Review Guidance (OSWER No. 9355.7-03B-P, EPA 540-R-Ol-007). EPA does concur that the Tipton Airfield Parcel is protective in the short-term. However, EP A has made a determination that the long-term protectiveness of the Tipton Airfield Parcel must be deferred until the Land Use Controls are formally captured within a CERCLA decision document. EPA and the Army are currently in the process of finalizing an ESD that will address a) the need for sweeps of ordnance; b) appropriate disposal of ordnance if discovered; and c) land use control requirements. A Land Use Control Remedial Design should be submitted following the ESD which discusses the specifics of the Land Use Controls (i.e. what actions are limited and the extent of their limitation). Furthermore, as part of this five-year review, EPA has evaluated the basewide Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) measures for this site and has determined their status is as follows: Environmental Indicators 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Master Plan Committee Document
    City of Laurel Master Plan Goals, Objectives, and Policies ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF LAUREL ____________ ____, 2016 – ORDINANCE NO. ____ February 2016 Draft 8103 SANDY SPRING ROAD LAUREL, MARYLAND CITY OF LAUREL Mayor: Craig A. Moe City Council: H. Edward Ricks, President Michael R. Leszcz, President Pro Tem Valerie M. A. Nicholas, First Ward Donna L. Crary, Second Ward Frederick Smalls, Second Ward In Conjunction With the Planning Commission Mitzi R Betman, Chairwoman John R. Kish, Vice Chairman Frederick Smalls, Ex-Officio Member Bill Wellford Donald E. Williford G. Rick Wilson And the Master Plan Review Committee Richard Armstrong Pam Brown Toni Drake Samuel Epps Roy P. Gilmore Douglas Hayes Steve Meyerer Luther Roberts G. Rick Wilson __________ ___, 2016 1 ABSTRACT Title City of Laurel Master Plan Author: Department of Community Planning and Business Services Maps: Department of Information Technology Subject: Master Plan for the City of Laurel. Elements include land use, municipal growth, community facilities, water resources, public safety, transportation, recreation, sensitive areas, and implementation. Date: __________ ____, 2016 Abstract: This document sets forth recommendations for the future development and growth of the City. Specific recommendations are made for the many elements integral to the functioning of the City including land use proposals, transportation concerns, capital improvements and the physical and living environments. The focus of the document is to provide a long- range plan for the retention of the traditional characteristics of Laurel with the integration of future land use development. 2 ORDINANCE NO. ____ AN ORDINANCE TO APPROVE AND ADOPT A MASTER PLAN FOR THE CITY OF LAUREL Sponsored by the President at the request of the Administration.
    [Show full text]