DOCSLIB.ORG

Supplemental Environmental Assessment for the James J

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Supplemental Environmental Assessment for the James J Supplemental Environmental Assessment for the James J. Rowley Training Center Master Plan, 2017 Update November 2017 Prepared for Department of Homeland Security/ United States Secret Service JAMES J. ROWLEY TRAINING CENTER MASTER PLAN, 2017 UPDATE SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Responsible Agency: U.S. Secret Service Abstract: The U.S. Secret Service (USSS) has prepared this Supplemental Environmental Assessment (SEA) for the James J. Rowley Training Center (RTC) Master Plan 2017 Update, located in Prince George’s County, Maryland. The project includes the construction of new facilities, the renovation of existing facilities, the consolidation of facilities into precincts, infrastructure expansion, and security upgrades. This SEA considers the environmental effects of implementing a No Action (No Build) Alternative and an Action Alternative. For information concerning this document contact: Communications Center, SAF Attn: Thomas Franklin 245 Murray Lane, SW, Bldg. T-5 Washington, DC 20223 [email protected] Supplemental EA for the James J. Rowley Training Center Master Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Project Location ............................................................................................................................................................................ 2 Purpose and Need for the Action ........................................................................................................................................ 2 History of the RTC ........................................................................................................................................................................ 4 Existing Facilities ........................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Public and Agency Involvement ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Issues and Impact Topics ........................................................................................................................................................ 5 Alternatives ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Actions Common to Both Alternatives ............................................................................................................................. 9 Alternative A: No Action Alternative ................................................................................................................................. 13 Alternative B: Action Alternative ........................................................................................................................................ 13 Alternative Considered But Dismissed .......................................................................................................................... 14 Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences................................................................................................... 21 Methodology of Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences ............................................. 23 Land Use and Planning Policies ......................................................................................................................................... 24 Socioeconomics, Environmental Justice, and Protection of Children .......................................................... 33 Historic and Archaeological Resources ........................................................................................................................ 38 Roadways and Traffic Patterns .......................................................................................................................................... 39 Parking ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 45 Public Transit ............................................................................................................................................................................... 46 Topography, Drainage, and Soils ...................................................................................................................................... 48 Water Resources ....................................................................................................................................................................... 53 Vegetation ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 65 Wildlife ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 72 Noise ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 74 Air Quality ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 76 Utilities ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 81 Stormwater Management ..................................................................................................................................................... 83 Sustainability ................................................................................................................................................................................ 85 Hazardous Materials ................................................................................................................................................................ 87 Coastal Zone Management .................................................................................................................................................. 89 Summary of Impacts................................................................................................................................................................ 91 Cumulative Impacts.................................................................................................................................................................. 99 Table of Contents i Supplemental EA for the James J. Rowley Training Center Master Plan References ...................................................................................................................................................................................................102 List of Preparers ........................................................................................................................................................................................106 Notification List ..........................................................................................................................................................................................110 Figures Figure 1: Project Location .......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Figure 2: Existing Site Plan...................................................................................................................................................................... 15 Figure 3: 2012 RTC Master Plan .......................................................................................................................................................... 16 Figure 4: Proposed 2017 RTC Master Plan Update .................................................................................................................. 17 Figure 5: Comparison of 2012 RTC Master Plan and 2017 Master Plan Update....................................................... 18 Figure 6: Comparison of Existing Conditions, 2012 RTC Master Plan, and 2017 RTC Master Plan Update ..... .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 19 Figure 7: RTC Soil Types, Locations, and Existing and Proposed Hardscape ............................................................. 51 Figure 8: Wetlands and Waters Delineated within the RTC (2016) .................................................................................... 57 Figure 9: Impacts on Wetlands and Waters within the RTC .................................................................................................. 67 Figure 10: Vegetation Plan for Alternative A ................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sayers, Margery
    Sayers, Margery From: Melissa Annen <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 8:30 PM To: CouncilMail Subject: CR 111 Vote No"! As a Howard County resident who lives and drives this area daily, I do not want Howard County to help fund a railroad station and two parking garages and other infrastructure for the ill-conceived development which will bring 1000 residential units and about 800,000 sq. ft of commercial and office space to Route 1 at the Howard entrance to the Laurel Race track. The traffic nightmares will be intolerable! The City of Laurel train station is only 2500 feet away. Why should we fund this for the developer??? It will do nothing to help improve the traffic in that area, only cause MORE traffic. Please vote NO!!!! Melissa Annen Savage/ MD Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android Sayers, Margery From: Donald Campbell <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 8:40 PM To: CouncilMail Subject: Parking garages and railroad station > Dear Howard County Council, > > I am writing this email to let you know that I vote no on CR111.1 do > not believe that Howard County should continue to fund developers on > building things such as a Rail Station and 2 new Parking garages. > Someone up there really needs to learn how to say no to some things. I > feel and urge you all to table this bill. > > Thanks for your time in this matter! > > Myra Phelps > 8808 Baltimore Street > Savage, Maryland 20763 Sayers, Margery From: Donald Campbell <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 8:57 PM To: CouncilMail Subject: Railroad station and Parking garages Dear County Council, I am writing to info you that I vote NO on CR 111.
    [Show full text]
  • Dimensions Healthcare System Request for Proposals the State Of
    Dimensions Healthcare System Request for Proposals The State of Maryland and Prince George’s County have each enacted legislative policies that encourage the participation of locally- based and minority-owned businesses. I. DEFINITIONS 1.1 “Contractor” means the Offeror selected and contracted in accordance with sections 5.5 and 5.7 of this RFP to perform the work specified in Part IV of this RFP. 1.2 “Contract Manager” means the staff representative of the Oversight Committee designated in section 4.8 of this RFP who will oversee, on behalf of the Oversight Committee, the Project and the Contractor’s activities. 1.3 “Offeror” means an entity that submits a timely proposal in response to and in accordance with the terms of this RFP. 1.4 “Oversight Committee” or “Committee” means the committee created pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding between the State of Maryland and Prince George’s County described in section 2.2 of this RFP, to support and enhance the medical services provided by the health care facilities managed by Dimensions Healthcare System. 1.5 “Project” means the services described in Part IV of this RFP. 1.6 “Project Manager” means the individual representative of the Contractor designated in its proposal, pursuant to subsection 5.1.2 of this RFP, as responsible for management of the Project and the services described in Part IV of this RFP, and who serves as the primary point of contact for the Contractor regarding all tasks related to the engagement. 1.7 “Project Coordinator” means the representative or representatives of Dimensions Healthcare System identified in section 4.8 of this RFP who are responsible for on-site, day-to-day project coordination with the Contractor.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents January 8, 2020
    BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS TABLE OF CONTENTS JANUARY 8, 2020 LOCATION: STATE HOUSE, 100 STATE CIRCLE, GOVERNOR’S RECEPTION ROOM, ANNAPOLIS Section Overall Item page no. page no. SECRETARY’S AGENDA 1 Agriculture 1 2 Board of Public Works PAAR 2 3-4 3 Board of Public Works Wetlands 15-17 24 5 Board of Public Works Advisory 5 6 Office of the Attorney General 6 7-9 7 Housing & Community Dev’t 18-20 28 10 Environment 15 11 16 MD Stadium Authority 22 34 12-13 St. Mary’s College 17 14 Board of Public Works Regulations 21 21 Natural Resources 32 23 Supplemental: Record Correction 36 APPENDIX EMERGENCY REPORTS A1 App1 37 General Services A3 App4 40 A2 Human Services App2 38 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES/REAL PROPERTY SUPPLEMENT 1-3 Rural Legacy DNR1 41 4 MD Environmental Trust DNR8 48 5 Timber Sales DNR9 49 6-8 Program Open Space Local Share DNR10 50 9 Program Open Space State Share DNR13 53 UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF MARYLAND SUPPLEMENT 1 USM1 54 G.O. Bonds 8 USM15 68 2-3 University of MD, College Park USM3 56 4 USM8 61 University of MD Eastern Shore 7 USM13 66 5 University of MD, Baltimore USM11 64 6 USM12 65 Salisbury University 11 USM20 73 9-10 University of MD, Baltimore County USM16 69 12 Bowie State University USM22 75 PAGE TWO BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS TABLE OF CONTENTS JANUARY 8, 2020 Section Overall Item page no. page no. MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1-4 MD Aviation Administration MDOT1 78 5-6 MD Port Administration MDOT8 85 7-8 MDOT15 92 MD Transit Administration 13-16 MDOT29 106 9-10 MDOT20 97 Motor Vehicle Administration 17-19 MDOT34 111 11-12 MDOT25 102 20 State Highway Administration MDOT41 118 23 MDOT49 126 21-22 The Secretary’s Office MDOT42 119 DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES 1-10 OSP1 133 Capital Grants & Loans 43-53 OSP70 202 11-13 OSP13 149 Construction 54 OSP81 213 14-21 OSP18 150 28-29 OSP49 181 55-59 OSP82 214 Services 80 OSP130 262 82 OSP138 270 83 OSP141 273 22-25 OSP33 165 40-42 OSP64 196 60-66 Information Technology OSP91 223 78 OSP127 259 79 OSP129 261 26-27 OSP44 176 39 Maintenance OSP62 194 67-69 OSP111 243 30 OSP53 185 G.O.
    [Show full text]
  • News and Notes Prince George's County J § 'W
    News and Notes Prince George's County J § 'W . CO , Historical Society ! = = 3 e 'MaritlU' February 1997 Our 45th Year Volume XXV Number 1 BOARD OF DIRECTORS 1997 President - Jane Eagen Directors 1997-1999 Past Presidents Vice President - Eugene Roberts, Jr. Mildred Ridgeley Gray John Giannetti Secretary - Sarah Bourne Melinda Alter Paul T. Lanham Treasurer - John Bourne Katherine Clagett Warren Rhoads Historian - Frederick DeMarr Directors 1996-1998 W.C. (Bud) Button Editor - Sharon Howe Sweeting Julie Bright Joyce MacDonald John Mitchell William Uber Illustration by Fred H. Greenberg from Washington Itself by E. J. Applewhite, 1986 JOIN US on SATURDAY, MARCH 8 at 2:00 pm at the Glenn Dale Community Center Mr David J. Danelski, Supreme Court Historian, will speak on Sons of Maryland on the United States Supreme Court: Thomas Johnson, Samuel Chase, Gabriel Duvall, Roger Brooke Taney and Thurgood Marshall. Mr. Danelski has researched, taught and written extensively about the United States Supreme Count. He will share little know stories and attempt to undo some popular misconceptions about these men. We have invited the members of the Duvall Society to join us for this celebration of Gabriel Duvall. The reception following the program will be at Marietta, home of Gabriel Duvall. FROM THE EDITOR'S DESK Happy New Year. You will notice on the cover the new/old Board of Directors of the Historical Society and an announcement of the meeting on Saturday, March 8 (2:00 pm, Glenn Dale Community Center) on "Sons of Maryland on the United States Supreme Court." This issue begins with the continuation of a column called Meet the Meet the Board Board written by Secretary Sarah Bourne.
    [Show full text]
  • The Opportunity for a Renovated MARC Station at Laurel Race Track
    The Opportunity for a Renovated MARC Station at The Maryland Jockey Club at Laurel Park Presented by Mark Thompson 1/ST Properties 1 1/ST RACING: A NATIONAL PORTFOLIO OF TOP RACE TRACKS Properties Properties 1/ST RACING: COMPETITIVE STRATEGY 1/ST Racing provides… →Industry-leading, experiential entertainment →Modernized racing facilities →Cutting edge digital horse wagering 1/ST Properties develops… →Active entertainment communities that create synergy with our core business EXPERIENTIAL ENTERTAINMENT MODERN FACILITIES DIGITAL WAGERING Properties THE MARYLAND JOCKEY CLUB Pimlico / Laurel Park / Rosecroft / Bowie → Founded in 1743 → Presidents George Washington & Andrew Jackson were members → Owns the Preakness Stakes, Pimlico, Maryland Jockey Club at Laurel Park, Bowie Training Track, and Rosecroft Raceway → Owned & operated by The Stronach Group since 2007 → The Stronach Group is investing and growing racing in Maryland MARYLAND JOCKEY CLUB AT LAUREL PARK: Properties REGIONAL LOCATION Properties FACILITIES AND LAND HOLDINGS ACRES Total: 350 → Howard: 63 → Anne Arundel: 287 CLUBHOUSE → Built in 1911 → 412,000 SF OPERATIONS → Open Days: 362 → Racing Days: 168 → Training Days: 363 → MJC Employees: 440 → Backstretch Employees: 600-800 → Equine Athletes: 900+ Properties Scale One of the largest contiguous parcels in HoCo: → 63 Total Acres → 25 Acres of Open and Recreation Space Program Transit Oriented Development Zoning: → 1,000 Residential Units → 650,000 Square Feet of Commercial Uses → 127,000 Square Feet of Retail Uses Properties INITIAL
    [Show full text]
  • Bowie State MARC Station Area
    A Technical Assistance Panel Report Bowie State MARC Station Area Sponsored by: Bowie State MARC Station Development Board and Prince George’s County Planning Department The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission October 17-18, 2011 1 Bowie State MARC Station Area Prince George’s County, MD October 17-18, 2011 A Technical Assistance Panel Report ULI Washington 4909 Cordell Avenue 2nd Floor Bethesda, MD 20814 (240) 497-1919 Fax: (240) 497-1818 www.washington.uli.org 2 About ULI Washington A District Council of the Urban Land Institute ULI Washington is a district council of ULI–the Urban Land Institute, a nonprofit education and research organization supported by its members. Founded in 1936, the Institute today has over 30,000 members worldwide representing the entire spectrum of land use planning and real estate development disciplines, working in private enterprise and public service. As the preeminent, multidisciplinary real estate forum, ULI facilitates the open exchange of ideas, information, and experience among local, national, and international industry leaders and policy makers dedicated to creating better communities. ULI’s mission is to provide leadership in the responsible use of land and in creating and sustaining thriving communities worldwide. ULI Washington carries out the ULI mission locally by sharing best practices, building consensus, and advancing solutions through its educational programs and community outreach initiatives. About the Technical Assistance Panel (TAP) Program The objective of ULI Washington’s Technical Assistance Panel (TAP) program is to provide expert, multidisciplinary advice on land use and real estate issues facing public agencies and nonprofit organizations in the Washington Metropolitan area.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Metropolitan Area Transit, Commission
    WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT, COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. ORDER NO. 1138 IN THE MATTER OF: Served June P, 1971 Application of WMA Transit ) Application No. 671 Company for Permanent Authority ) to Operate Route X Between ) Docket No. 226 Laurel , Maryland and Washington, ) D. C. By Application No. 671, filed on December 17, 1970, WMA Transit Company (WMA) sought to amend its WMATC Certificate- of Public Convenience and Necessity No. 8 to add authority to operate between Laurel, Maryland and Washington, D. C. WMA proposed to operate one round trip each day over the following route: From Lau rel to Farra ut S oars Commencing at Cherry Lane and U. S. Highway Route I (Laurel Shopping Center), thence via U.S. Highway Route 1, Maryland State- Route 198, Irving Street, Maryland State Route 197 (Bowie-Laurel Road), Briar- croft Lane, Briarwood Road,.Contee Road, Maryland State Route 197, cut-off to southbound Baltimore- Washington Parkway, Baltimore Washington Parkway, Kenilworth Avenue, cut-off to East Capitol Street, East Capitol Street Bridge, C Street, N.E.; North Carolina Avenue, N.E.; Constitution Avenue, N.E.; 3rd Street, N.W.; C Street, S.W.; 6th Street, S.W.; D Street, S.W.; thru S,W. Bus Terminal, D Street, S'.W.; lath Street, S.W.; Independence Avenue, S.W.; 14th Street, S.W.; H Street, N.W.; Connecticut Avenue, N.W., to Terminal Stand south of Farragut Square. From_Farragut Square to Laurel Commencing at Terminal Stand on Connecticut Avenue south of Farragut Square, thence via Eye Street, N.W.; 14th Street, N.W.; Independence Avenue, S.W.;, 12th Street; S.W.; D Street, S.W.; thru S.W.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Master Plan Committee Document
    City of Laurel Master Plan Goals, Objectives, and Policies ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF LAUREL ____________ ____, 2016 – ORDINANCE NO. ____ February 2016 Draft 8103 SANDY SPRING ROAD LAUREL, MARYLAND CITY OF LAUREL Mayor: Craig A. Moe City Council: H. Edward Ricks, President Michael R. Leszcz, President Pro Tem Valerie M. A. Nicholas, First Ward Donna L. Crary, Second Ward Frederick Smalls, Second Ward In Conjunction With the Planning Commission Mitzi R Betman, Chairwoman John R. Kish, Vice Chairman Frederick Smalls, Ex-Officio Member Bill Wellford Donald E. Williford G. Rick Wilson And the Master Plan Review Committee Richard Armstrong Pam Brown Toni Drake Samuel Epps Roy P. Gilmore Douglas Hayes Steve Meyerer Luther Roberts G. Rick Wilson __________ ___, 2016 1 ABSTRACT Title City of Laurel Master Plan Author: Department of Community Planning and Business Services Maps: Department of Information Technology Subject: Master Plan for the City of Laurel. Elements include land use, municipal growth, community facilities, water resources, public safety, transportation, recreation, sensitive areas, and implementation. Date: __________ ____, 2016 Abstract: This document sets forth recommendations for the future development and growth of the City. Specific recommendations are made for the many elements integral to the functioning of the City including land use proposals, transportation concerns, capital improvements and the physical and living environments. The focus of the document is to provide a long- range plan for the retention of the traditional characteristics of Laurel with the integration of future land use development. 2 ORDINANCE NO. ____ AN ORDINANCE TO APPROVE AND ADOPT A MASTER PLAN FOR THE CITY OF LAUREL Sponsored by the President at the request of the Administration.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Laurel Master Plan
    City of Laurel Master Plan Goals, Objectives, and Policies ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF LAUREL July 25, 2016 – ORDINANCE NO. 1873 8103 SANDY SPRING ROAD LAUREL, MARYLAND CITY OF LAUREL Mayor: Craig A. Moe City Council: H. Edward Ricks, President Michael R. Leszcz, President Pro Tem Valerie M. A. Nicholas, First Ward Donna L. Crary, Second Ward Frederick Smalls, Second Ward In Conjunction With the Planning Commission Mitzi R Betman, Chairwoman John R. Kish, Vice Chairman Frederick Smalls, Ex-Officio Member Bill Wellford Donald E. Williford G. Rick Wilson And the Master Plan Review Committee Richard Armstrong Pam Brown Toni Drake Samuel Epps Roy P. Gilmore Douglas Hayes Steve Meyerer Luther Roberts G. Rick Wilson July 25, 2016 1 ABSTRACT Title City of Laurel Master Plan Author: Department of Economic and Community Development Maps: Department of Information Technology Subject: Master Plan for the City of Laurel. Elements include land use, municipal growth, community facilities, water resources, public safety, transportation, recreation, sensitive areas, and implementation. Date: July 25, 2016 Abstract: This document sets forth recommendations for the future development and growth of the City. Specific recommendations are made for the many elements integral to the functioning of the City including land use proposals, transportation concerns, capital improvements and the physical and living environments. The focus of the document is to provide a long- range plan for the retention of the traditional characteristics of Laurel with the integration of future land use development. 2 ORDINANCE NO. 1873 AN ORDINANCE TO APPROVE AND ADOPT A MASTER PLAN FOR THE CITY OF LAUREL Sponsored by the President at the request of the Administration.
    [Show full text]
  • AA-891 Laurel Racetrack, (Laurel Park)
    AA-891 Laurel Racetrack, (Laurel Park) Architectural Survey File This is the architectural survey file for this MIHP record. The survey file is organized reverse- chronological (that is, with the latest material on top). It contains all MIHP inventory forms, National Register nomination forms, determinations of eligibility (DOE) forms, and accompanying documentation such as photographs and maps. Users should be aware that additional undigitized material about this property may be found in on-site architectural reports, copies of HABS/HAER or other documentation, drawings, and the “vertical files” at the MHT Library in Crownsville. The vertical files may include newspaper clippings, field notes, draft versions of forms and architectural reports, photographs, maps, and drawings. Researchers who need a thorough understanding of this property should plan to visit the MHT Library as part of their research project; look at the MHT web site (mht.maryland.gov) for details about how to make an appointment. All material is property of the Maryland Historical Trust. Last Updated: 05-13-2019 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR Eligible: yes DETERMINATION OF ELIGIBILITY FORM no X Property Name: Laurel Racetrack Inventory Number: AA-891 Address: 3600 Laurel - Ft. Meade Road. City: Laurel Zip Code: 20724 County: Anne Arundel and Howard USGS Topographic Map: Laurel Owner: Laurel Racing Association LP Is the property being evaluated a district? X yes Tax Parcel Number: 86 Tax Map Number: 19 Tax Account ID Number: 03593300 U.S. Army, Corps of Engineers, Baltimore
    [Show full text]
  • Mayor and City Council of Laurel Department of Economic and Community Development
    MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF LAUREL DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 8103 Sandy Spring Road Laurel, Maryland 20707 (301) 725-5300 Web: http://www.cityoflaurel.org E-mail: [email protected] DATE October 4, 2018 AGENDA ITEM NO. 8 AMENDED TECHNICAL STAFF REPORT TO: City of Laurel Planning Commission FROM: Christian L. Pulley, Director CASE: Patuxent Greens Golf Course- Final Site & Landscape Plan GENERAL INFORMATION APPLICANT: ADC Builders Inc. 6290 Montrose Road Rockville, MD 20852 OWNER: Cohen Siegel Investors 6290 Montrose Road Rockville, MD 20852 LOCATION: 14415 Greenview Drive Laurel, MD 20708 ZONE: Planned Unit Development Existing (PUD-E) REQUESTED ACTION: Final Site and Landscape Plan Approval PREVIOUS ACTION: First Annexation 1981 PUD Amendment September 12, 1983 (Resolution No. 16-83) PUD Amendment September 10, 1984 (Resolution No. 12-84) Map Amendment (No. 330) October 22, 1984 (Resolution No. 14-84) Map Amendment (No. 502) June 4, 1990 (Ordinance No. 934) Departure of Approved PUD Plan, December 11, 2017 (17-17-PC) Map Amendment No. 880 (17-16-PC), Ordinance No. 1924, January 22, 2018 BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Applicant is seeking Final Site and Landscape Plan approval to re-develop the Patuxent Greens Golf Course, located at 14415 Greenview Drive, Laurel, MD 20708 into a residential community. The subject property consists of 191.71 acres of land and is located on the eastern corner of Greenview Drive and Clubhouse Boulevard. The property is approximately one-tenth of a mile southeast from the intersection of Laurel Bowie Road (Maryland Route 197) and Clubhouse Boulevard. The proposed project is to subdivide land into 222 townhouses and 167 single-family homes for 1 389 residential development units (36.67 acres).
    [Show full text]
  • 1999 Master Plan for Redevelopment of Old Town Bowie
    0ili r I I I i iii Master Plan for Redevelopn1ent of I Old To vn Bo vie j j I I I I I I I I City of Bowie I and the Old Town Bowie Steering Committee Ii Thomas Point Associates Inc The Faux Group Inc lOT Associates Inc II D FeinDesign KELLERCo I i aUitrl Seprember 1999 Table of Contents Section No Title Page No Executive Summary 1 Introduction 1 1 2 Existing Conditions 2 1 Overview 2 1 2 2 Design and Infrastructure 2 3 2 3 Traffic and Transportation 2 20 2 4 Conclusions 2 22 3 Market Analysis 3 1 Demographic and Economic Conditions 31 3 2 Existing Market Conditons 39 JM 3 3 Analysis of Tourism 317 3 4 Projections 322 3 5 Conclusions 327 4Ii 4 Plan Overview 4 1 Vision 41 4 2 Recommendations 41 4 3 Zoning and Development Regulatory Tools 43 4 Parking Improvements 412 4 5 Traffic Improvements 415 4 6 Development Opportunities 418 4 7 Conclusions 430 5 Implementation Financing and Financial Feasibility 5 1 Costs Priorities and Responsibilities 51 5 2 Funding and Phasing 53 5 3 Implementation Tools 53 54 Cost Benefit Analysis 59 5 5 Retail Leasing Strategy 5 16 5 6 Marketing Plan 520 5 7 Conclusions 525 6 Conclusions 61 Executive Summary Executive Summary Old Town Bowie Redevelopment Plan In February 1999 the City ofBowie retained a team of consultants in design transportation and economics to prepare this master plan for Old Town Bowie the historic village center ofthe City ililIl The consultants held public meetings and discussions with business leaders and residents their in order to structure conclusions and recommendations Residents spoke
    [Show full text]