Operation Aleppo P Pp

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Operation Aleppo P Pp Opppperation Aleppo Back Ground Material Related to Chapters 11 & 12 First phase of Battle of Aleppo To Buy Operation Aleppo in paperback or Kindle e-book, visit: www.amazon.co.uk or www.amazon.com (then search Operation Aleppo by Tim Ripley) Battle of Aleppo – Operation Dawn of Victory 24 SepteSeptebetomber to 17 No oebevember 200616 Briefing by Tim Ripley, Part 1 updated 12th January 2017 SOURCES This briefing is based in analysis of multiple sources, including: 1. Analysis of news media still and video imagery 2. Analysis of social media still and video imagery from Syria, Turkey and Russia. Syrian soldiers and militia fighters, Shia militia fighters and Russian servicemen incessantly post on‐line photos of themselves and their fiends. 3. Syrian and Russian ggpovernment news products 4. Google Earth and other commercial satellite imagery By Geo‐location and comparing the above, it is possible to gain a reasonable “ground truth” about © [email protected] what is happening on the ground. NOTE: All the images in this brief Mob +44 (0) 7711 806905 are all sourced from “raw” video imagery from Syria Future Syrian and Allied Operations Against Aleppo, Nov‐Dec 2016 Operation Dawn of Victory Battle Plan Note: Syrian and allied forces have no intention of launching a direct or all out Russian Involvement frontal assault on the heavily populated urban area of eastern Aleppo. Future Russian involvement 3rd Phase: continue push rebels back away from western outer siege lines (mid November) in the final phases will be: 4th Phase: seize rural, industrial and unpopulated areas along the eastern edge of Aleppo city, to pen 1. Airpower and surveillance on the outer the remaining population and rebel fighters tightly into urban areas withwithoutout means to grow food or siege lines to prevent any This photo take in the water sources. (late November) rebel attempt to lift siege office of the Syrian 5th Phase: break up rebel held eastern Aleppo enclave into a series of smaller pockets, which are of Aleppo, hitting targets commander in Aleppo, considered more then likely to surrender and volunteer for “evacuation”. (December) in south west Aleppo and SRG Major‐General Zaid AIM to clear out eastern Aleppo of rebel fighters by the end of December Idlib provinces. Saleh, on 25th Oct 16 2. Psychological warfare to intimidate population show expected rebel and fighters in eastern offensive and the future Aleppo to surrender and Syrian offensive evacuate their enclave operations 3. Demonstration of force Source: @Souria4Syrians with prestige weapons 5th Phase (Kalibr cruise missiles and Operations carrier aviation) to create “intimidation” effect. Russian airpower and strategic weapons have little 4th Phase utility in close quarter street fighting so will not be Operations employed in fighting inside rd eastern Aleppo 3 Phase Operations Rebel Forces in and around Aleppo © [email protected] City, Sept‐Nov 2016 Train in Northern Balance of Forces in Aleppo City: • 8,000 fighters (including 1,000 from Nusra Syria bringing Front) inside Aleppo city (Source: UN) Government Aug to Nov 2016 • 50,000 fighters in Idlib region, to the south reinforcements and west of Aleppo. Some 3‐4,000 of these to Aleppo 7 Aug are trained and equipped for offensive 16, Source: Syrian Government and Allies, July 2016 combat operations @IvanSidorenko Republican Guard and Special Forces, 2,000+ troops • The Russian MOD claimed there were 6,000 1 Syrian Arab Army (SAA) Regulars 2, 500+ troops. Mostly in command, artillery, logistic rebel fighters operating around the western and air force units edge of Aleppo’s outer siege lines Militia: 10,000? fighters (civilian mobilised to operate on shift system to man front line defences) Allies: 8,000? fighters (majority deployed to south of Aleppo city, expect for 1,000 Palest inia n fig hte rs w ho a re based in t he no rt h o f Aleppo ci ty) Syrian Government Reinforcements – 5-6,000 additional troops arrive from Aug Low loaders bring to Oct 2016 Syrian Republican Early August 2016 Guard T‐72s to • Elements 15th Special Forces Division Aleppo, 29th Sept 16 • Military Intelligence Shield Forces - Lions Den Battalion source: Late August 2016 @IvanSidorenko1 • 800th Republican Guard (RG) Regiment from Damascus Late September 2016 • Elements 102nd & 106th RG Brigades & 4th Mechanised Division (identified as moving from Damascus 23/9/16, Column of Syrian with 1,750 troops) Army reinforcements • Units of Tiger Force and Desert Hawks to Kweires Front from Hama arrive in Aleppo 21 Late October • Brigade sized armour equipped unit, local media report 1,500 troops arrive in Aleppo from Damascus and Tartus Oct 16, including 2S1 • Desert Hawks arrive in Aleppo Province 122mm SP gun and • Republican Guard “Shudada Kafr Saghira” Brigade (arrive late Oct) BMP fighting vehicles These units – expect for the Tiger Force and Desert Hawks - were all released from the Damascus region as a result of Source: Arab source the surrender of rebel enclaves around the capital. Take Away: • Syrian Government has more troops capable of “offensive” operations in the Aleppo region than the rebels, by a ratio of 3 or 4:1 Overall commander of wider Aleppo theatre of operations, ALEPPO REGION – Major General Qassem Soleimani (who is also the Pro‐Government Chain of Iranian Revolutionary Guards ) • ) Corps Quds Force commander Command in south Aleppo, 6 Sept 16. Source: Arab Source Syrian/Russian/Iranian/Hizbullah “CentCom” Joint Operations Room or Command Post located at Al Safirah Military Base, south east of Aleppo city Commander Russian Military Contingent in Syria, Lt Gen Aldlexander Zhlhuravlev, Republican Guard gives medals to Palestinian militia in Major‐General Zaid Aleppo, 23rd Oct 16 Saleh, Head of the Source: @IvanSidorenko1 Aleppo Security Committee and commander of Syrian military operations in Lt. Gen. Vladimir Savchenko, head of the Aleppo, 26 Sept 16 Coordination Centre for Reconciliation of Source: Arab Source Opposing Sides, giving out medals to Palestinian militia in Aleppo. He is head of negotiating truces and surrenders, as well as psychological warfare ops. Source: An unidentified Russian general gives https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6if5Y7f medals to troops of Military D2uM Intelligence Shield 223 unit in Aleppo 11 Oct 16 Ba’ath Party Committee in Aleppo runs the city on Source: @IvanSidorenko1 behalf of Damascus government Take Aways: Source: nmedia, , 26 Sept 16 • Operation Dawn of Victory is a “coalition” battle Major General Sergey Sevryukov , commander of • Russia is the “dominant voice” in the coalition, due the presence of the Russian 49th Army with Baath Russian air group in Syria, political support from Moscow and the Russian Party Brigades on advisory veto on the UN Security Council visit to Aleppo, Aug 16 © [email protected] Source: KP.ru Syrian Advance against Aleppo Enclave © [email protected] 24/9/2016 to 17/10/16 Aleppo siege lines 24th September 2016 Aleppo siege lines 16th October 2016 Inner Siege Lines 4km Outer Siege Lines Syrian Penetration 4km Eastern Aleppo Wide Rebel controlled Syrian enclave, with 250,000 to Front 275,000 civilians inside © [email protected] North West Aleppo Government Outer Siege Lines and Rebel Aleppo North East Syrian Arab Army Outer Siege Lines 147th Sppgecial Forces Regiment Offensives •Kwieres Airbase Garrison (driven from Artillery base early Aug 24/9/16 to (Major General Munzer 16) 106th Special Forces Brigade rd Zammam) – 300 airforce troops 83 Republican Guard Battalion 6/10/16 Palestinian militia “Liwaa Al‐Quds” Militia Forces Qadesh 'the lion's lair' RG group •Union of Forat Jarabulus • Zahraa and Nubl National 24/9/16 & 27/9/16 Batttalion (Commnander Aref 29/9/16 Defence Force Successful on 29/9/2016 & 1/10/16 Ehmaid Al Jaber Abu Stayff) •Tiger Force uiits (arrive from Rebels 24/9/16 Tartus, 27 Sep 16) Aleppo City inner siege •Desert Hawks Brigade (arrive 3&4/10/16 1&2/10/16 late Oct) lines •Republican Guard “Shudada Syrian Arab Army HQ of 2nd Reserve Division (2,500 + regular RG + Palestinian Quds Kaffr ShiSaghira”Bi” Briga de (arr ive 30/9/16 late Oct) troops) 2/10/16 & 3/10/16 • 106th Special Forces Brigade (Brigadier Suheil 4/10/2016 – 800 Bn RG Ismail) 5/10/16 – elms 102nd RG Brigade Russian Land Forces • elements 4th Division 5/10/16 – SAA & Baath Bns • 102nd Brigade Republican Guard (arrive from 6/10/2016 Contingent D?/Damascus ?/9/2016) SAA?? • Forward Command post of • 800th Regt RG (arrive from Damascus on 25 Hizbullah Aug) 27/9/16 Coordination Centre for • Military Intelligence Shield Forces ‐ Lions Den 1/10/16 Reconciliation of Opposing Battalion (arrive 6 Aug) •Elements 15th Special Forces Division (arrive 8 Sides Aug ) • Russian Orlan 10 UAV •Desert Hawks (arrive 31 Oct 16) (commander Colonel Mohammad Jaber) detachment •Tiger Force (arrive 31 Ocr 16) • MSTA B Battery 120th Allied Forces Russian Guards Artillery Palestinian militia “Liwaa Al‐Quds” (commanders Omar Hussein Al Hasan & Muhammad Rafi) Regiment, with 4 x 152mm Militia Forces A65 • National Defence Forces(NDF) of Aleppo City • Al-Ba’ath Battalions 102nd RG Brigade • Forward Air Controllers th •Contingent Liwa Imam Al‐Baqir Brigade ( Shia 800 Regt RG • Russian Naval Infantry Baath Bns NDF Brigade) Commander Khaled al Daher Hizbullah Company 24/9/16 & 4/10/16&7/10/16 © [email protected] Government and Rebel Offensives 6/10/16 to 17/10/16 Russian MOD and Syrian 102nd Brigade RG &Liwaa Al‐Quds SAA 7/8/9/10/16 Govt declared unilateral 8/10/16 11 &12/10/16 Ceasefire on SAA ?? 18th Oct 2016 until
Recommended publications
  • Iraq's Muqtada Al-Sadr
    IRAQ’S MUQTADA AL-SADR: SPOILER OR STABILISER? Middle East Report N°55 – 11 July 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................. i I. MUQTADA’S LINEAGE .............................................................................................. 1 A. MUHAMMAD BAQIR AL-SADR: THE REVOLUTIONARY THINKER AND “FIRST MARTYR” ......2 B. MUHAMMAD SADIQ AL-SADR: THE PLEBEIAN ACTIVIST AND “SECOND MARTYR”............3 C. MUQTADA AL-SADR: THE UNLIKELY HEIR .........................................................................6 II. MUQTADA’S STEEP AND SWIFT LEARNING CURVE....................................... 7 A. FROM CONFRONTATION TO DOMINANT PRESENCE................................................................7 B. TRIAL AND ERROR: THE FAILURE AND LESSONS OF RADICALISATION ................................10 C. MUQTADA’S POLITICAL ENTRY ..........................................................................................12 III. THE SADRIST MOVEMENT: AN ATYPICAL PHENOMENON ....................... 17 A. MUQTADA’S POLITICAL RESOURCES...................................................................................17 B. AN UNSTRUCTURED MOVEMENT ........................................................................................20 IV. THREE POTENTIAL SOURCES OF CONFLICT ................................................. 21 V. CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................. 24 APPENDICES A. MAP OF IRAQ ......................................................................................................................25
    [Show full text]
  • View/Print Page As PDF
    MENU Policy Analysis / PolicyWatch 3198 What Is Iran Up To in Deir al-Zour? by Oula A. Alrifai Oct 10, 2019 Also available in Arabic / Farsi ABOUT THE AUTHORS Oula A. Alrifai Oula A. Alrifai is a senior fellow in The Washington Institute's Geduld Program on Arab Politics. Brief Analysis Tehran and its proxies have been exerting hard and soft power in northeast Syria, combining military consolidation with economic, social, and religious outreach in order to cement their long-term influence. n September 30, Syria and Iraq reopened their main border crossing between al-Bukamal and al-Qaim, O which had been formally closed for five years. The circumstances surrounding the event were telling—the ceremony was delayed by a couple weeks because of unclaimed foreign airstrikes on Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps targets in east Syria following the Iranian attack against Saudi oil facilities earlier that month. What exactly have the IRGC and its local proxies been doing in Deir al-Zour province? And what does this activity tell us about Iran’s wider plans there? OPENING THE DOOR FOR IRAQI PROXIES T he border ceremony was led by Khadhim al-Ikabi, an Iraqi government representative, raising questions about whether the decision will help circumvent U.S. sanctions placed on Iran. Although Syrian state media celebrated the event as an opportunity to increase trade with Iraq, Tehran’s reaction indicated that the crossing will mainly serve Iranian military interests. According to officials and media in Iran, reopening the border is of “high strategic importance” in strengthening the Islamic Republic’s “trilateral coalition” with Baghdad and Damascus.
    [Show full text]
  • MIDDLE EAST, NORTH AFRICA Continued: Iran: Winning Hearts and Minds in Deir Ezzor “…A History of Iranian Shi’I Proselytism in Deir Ezzor Which Dates to 1988…”
    MIDDLE EAST, NORTH AFRICA Iran: Winning Hearts and Minds in Deir Ezzor OE Watch Commentary: Deir Ezzor is a tribal Sunni province of Syria located on the Euphrates River, along the border with Iraq. Its physical and socio-cultural environments resemble those of Iraq’s Anbar Province, and it was an ISIS stronghold for several years. Late last year, the provincial capital and surrounding areas were retaken by loyalist forces, with Iranian-backed militias leading the charge. Although it is not a natural social environment for deep-rooted Iranian influence to take hold, some of the Iran-backed militias may be there to stay. The foundations for Iran’s ability to assert control over this traditionally Sunni area are partially explained in the accompanying passage, published last November in the Syrian opposition news website alsouria.net. According to the article, soft-power measures from as early as 1988 have paved the way for Iran’s new foothold in Deir Ezzor. That year, the article claims, Iranian envoys began enticing poor villagers from the Baqqara (Baggara) tribe to adopt religious practices associated with Shi’i Iran. Through mechanisms such as the Imam al-Murtaza Foundation, Iran extended its influence by providing these neglected areas with material assistance and a new ideological edifice, based on Iranian Revolutionary ideals and centered around newly built Shi’i houses of worship (Husseiniyat). Iran’s close relations with the Assad government also allowed its envoys and allies to provide government functions in some areas, according to the article. The loyalist retaking of Deir Ezzor in late 2017 received crucial support from Nawaf al-Bashir, a prominent member of the Baqqara in Syria.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran's Networks of Influence in the Middle East
    an strategic dossier IRAN’S NETWORKS OF INFLUENCE IN THE MIDDLE EAST published by The International Institute for Strategic Studies ARUNDEL HOUSE | 6 TEMPLE PLACE | LONDON | WC2R 2PG | UK 1 an strategic dossier IRAN’S NETWORKS OF INFLUENCE IN THE MIDDLE EAST The International Institute for Strategic Studies ARUNDEL HOUSE | 6 TEMPLE PLACE | LONDON | WC2R 2PG | UK DIRECTOR-GENERAL AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE Dr John Chipman This publication has been prepared by the Director-General and Chief Executive of the Institute and his staff. It incorporates commissioned contributions from recognised subject experts, which were reviewed by a range of experts in the field. The IISS would like to thank the various individuals who contributed their expertise to the compilation of this dossier. The responsibility for the contents is ours alone. The views expressed herein do not, and indeed cannot, represent a consensus of views among the worldwide membership of the Institute as a whole. First published November 2019 by the International Institute for Strategic Studies. © 2019 The International Institute for Strategic Studies cover images: Top: Background: A Lebanese Hizbullah fighter near Arsal, Lebanon, 26 July 2017 (Anwar Amro/AFP/ Getty Images); main images, top–bottom: Popular Mobilisation Units fighters launch missiles targeting the village of Salmani, south of Mosul, in Iraq’s Nineva province, 30 October 2016 (Ahmad Al-Rubaye/AFP/Getty Images); Major- General Qasem Soleimani, commander of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) attends a meeting between Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei (not pictured) and the IRGC in Tehran, 18 September 2016 (by Pool/Press Office of Iranian Supreme Leader/Anadolu Agency/Getty Images); Pro-government forces at a funeral ceremony at the Sayyida Zainab mosque in Damascus, Syria, 26 April 2017 (Louai Beshara/AFP/Getty Images) Printed and bound in the UK by Hobbs the Printers Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Document in PDF Format
    Spotlight on Global Jihad November 2 – 8, 2017, 2017 Main events of the week The conquest of the regions controlled by the Islamic State has reached the last lap. Abu Kamal, ISIS's last stronghold, is currently under combined pressure from the Syrian army, the Shi'ite militias and Hezbollah operatives, and Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) advancing on the city from both sides of the Euphrates. The attack on Abu Kamal is being waged with intensive Russian air support. The first forces of the Shi'ite militias and Hezbollah are apparently a few dozen kilometers from Abu Kamal. All the forces, and the countries behind them, want to be part of the final victory at Abu Kamal, which will mean the end of the Islamic State's existence in Syria. For that reason Qasem Soleimani, commander of the IRGC's Qods Force, made a point of visiting Deir al-Zor and had his picture taken with Shi'ite militia fighters affiliated with Iran, despite being in mourning for the death of his father. The strategically significant events in Syria were overshadowed this week by potentially explosive local events in the northern Golan Heights. On November 3, 2017, the rebel forces headed by the Headquarters for the Liberation of al-Sham (originally the al-Qaeda- affiliated al-Nusra Front), initiated an offensive aimed to open a supply route to besieged rebel operatives in the Beit Jinn enclave. After several hours of clashes the Syrian army and its affiliated militias halted the attack and restored the status quo ante. According to a report, the clashes were renewed on November 6, 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Inherent Resolve Operation Pacific Eagle–Philippines
    LEAD INSPECTOR GENERAL I REPORT TO THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS OPERATION INHERENT RESOLVE OPERATION PACIFIC EAGLE–PHILIPPINES APRIL 1, 2018‒JUNE 30, 2018 ABOUT THIS REPORT In January 2013, legislation was enacted creating the Lead Inspector General (Lead IG) framework for oversight of overseas contingency operations. This legislation, which amended the Inspector General Act, requires the Inspectors General of the Department of Defense (DoD), Department of State (DoS), and U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) to, among other things, provide quarterly reports to Congress. The DoD Inspector General (IG) is designated as the Lead IG for Operation Inherent Resolve (OIR) and Operation Pacific Eagle-Philippines (OPE-P). The DoS IG is the Associate Inspector General for OIR and OPE-P. The USAID IG participates in oversight for both operations. The Offices of Inspector General of the DoD, DoS, and USAID are referred to in this report as the Lead IG agencies. Other partner agencies also contribute to oversight of OIR and OPE-P. The Lead IG agencies collectively carry out their four statutory missions related to these overseas contingency operations: • Develop a joint strategic plan to conduct comprehensive oversight over the contingency operation. • Ensure independent and effective oversight of programs and operations of the Federal Government in support of the contingency operation through either joint or individual audits, inspections, and investigations. • Perform analyses to ascertain the accuracy of information provided by federal agencies relating to obligations and expenditures, costs of programs and projects, accountability of funds, and the award and execution of major contracts, grants, and agreements.
    [Show full text]
  • Networks, Mobilisation and Resistance in the 2021 Presidential Election in Syria
    Networks, Mobilisation and Resistance in the 2021 Presidential Election in Syria Wartime and Post-Conflict in Syria Project’s Team Research Project Report Wartime and Post-Conflict in Syria Issue 2021/08 - 23 June 2021 © European University Institute 2021 Content and individual chapters © Wartime and Post-Conflict in Syria Project’s Team, 2021 This work has been published by the European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies. This text may be downloaded only for personal research purposes. Additional reproduction for other purposes, whether in hard copies or electronically, requires the consent of the authors. If cited or quoted, reference should be made to the full name of the author(s), editor(s), the title, the year and the publisher. Requests should be addressed to [email protected]. Views expressed in this publication reflect the opinion of individual authors and not those of the European University Institute. Middle East Directions Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Project Report RSCAS/Middle East Directions 2021/08 23 June 2021 European University Institute Badia Fiesolana I – 50014 San Domenico di Fiesole (FI) www.eui.eu/RSCAS/Publications/ cadmus.eui.eu Funded by the European Union 2 Networks, Mobilisation and Resistance in the 2021 Presidential Election in Syria Wartime and Post-Conflict in Syria Project’s Team* * The Wartime and Post-Conflict in Syria project (WPCS) provides operational and strategic analysis of prospects, challenges, trends and policy options in wartime and in preparation for post-conflict in Syria. WPCS focuses on policy and response-relevant themes, to include: key actors and dynamics of local governance; the war economy and its impact on the future reconstruction of Syria; the fragmentation of the military and security landscape and options to re-shape security frameworks; and regional interventions and their impact on local socio-political dynamics.
    [Show full text]
  • Fuel in Government of Syria Controlled Areas Thematic Report March 2020
    FUEL IN GOVERNMENT OF SYRIA CONTROLLED AREAS THEMATIC REPORT MARCH 2020 1 / 13 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The fuel crisis which has debilitated the Syrian economy since late 2018 has caused massive lines at pumping stations, battered domestic economic activity, threatened transportation and agricultural output and crippled fuel-dependent services nationwide. The shortage is a result of the conflict itself and a consequence of sanctions targeting the Government of Syria in Damascus and their Iranian backers. Destruction of domestic petroleum infrastructure and fragmented control of resources has shrunk domestic oil production from approximately 385,000 barrels per day in 2010 to no more than 24,000 barrels per day, far short of national demand. To cover the shortfall, the Government of Syria has explored piecemeal schemes to circumvent the restrictions and secure its energy needs. One such scheme was the use of a line of credit extended by Iran in 2013. This has become increasingly unstable as the Trump administration announced its strategy to “confront and contain Iran”, implementing sanctions which have all but halted critical Iranian tanker shipments to Syria. In response to its embattled position, Damascus then explored the possibility of importing fuel products from ISIS-controlled areas in the northeast of the country. The Government turned to the young businessman, Muhammad Bara al-Qaterji, who had extensive tribal connections in Ar-Raqqa, to arrange the supply of fuel products into Government-controlled areas. Qaterji, who was included in the US sanctions list, continued to supply the Government of Syria with fuel from northeast Syria under Kurdish self-administration (KSA) control.
    [Show full text]
  • “The Gulf and Iran's Capability for Asymmetric Warfare” (.Pdf)
    Anthony H. Cordesman, Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy The Gulf and Iran’s Capability for Asymmetric Warfare Anthony H. Cordesman Burke Chair in Strategy Working Paper: Please send comments to [email protected] January 10, 2020 Photo: ARASH KHAMOUSHI/AFP/ Getty Images Introduction 2 Much of the reporting on the clashes between Iran and the United States that began in late December 2019, that led to the strikes that killed the commander the Iran’s Quds force, Qasem Soleimani, and led to Iranian missile strikes on U.S. bases in Iran, have focused on the Quds force and treated it as the dominant element of Iraq’s military forces and Iran’s asymmetric capabilities. The Quds force is only part of a much broader and steadily growing mix of Iranian asymmetric warfare capabilities. Its role must be kept in careful perspective in evaluating the threat of any major escalation in the tensions and military exchanges between Iran and the United States and the risk of a major war in the Gulf. Furthermore, much of the recent news reporting on Iran has misstated the nature of Iran’s forces and capabilities. It is critical to assess Iran’s actual military capabilities, and the developments in its approach to asymmetric warfare, as accurately as is possible at the unclassified level and put them in the broader context of the capabilities that the U.S. and its Arab strategic partners can bring to bear in deterring and defending against Iran. This analysis focuses on both Iran’s overall capabilities for asymmetric warfare and the overall military balance in the Gulf – including U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly Conflict Summary | 16 - 22 September 2019
    WEEKLY CONFLICT SUMMARY | 16 - 22 SEPTEMBER 2019 WHOLE OF SYRIA SUMMARY • NORTHWEST | Despite a decrease in Government of Syria (GoS) aerial bombardment, increased levels of shelling on the Hayyat Tahrir ash Sham (HTS)-dominated Idleb enclave continued. In the Turkish-backed areas of northern Aleppo Governorate, improvised explosive device (IED) attacks and inter-group clashes increased. • SOUTH & CENTRAL | Attacks against GoS-aligned personnel continued in southern Syria and included a ISIS-claimed IED attack. ISIS activity also resumed in central areas of the country after the completion of a GoS ISIS clearance operation last week. In Quneitra Governorate, an uncommon inter-GoS groups clash occurred in Jbhat al Khashab town. • NORTHEAST | Widespread civilian protests against Iranian presence were reported in GoS-held Deir Ez Zor Governorate. The protests occurred two days after two airstrikes struck Iranian linked sites in the far east. The U.S.- backed Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) continued a recruitment drive that began last week. U.S./Turkish military also conducted the second joint patrol within a month in Ras al Ain town. Figure 1: Dominant Actors’ Area of Control and Influence in Syria as of 22 September 2019. NSOAG stands for Non-state Organized Armed Groups. Also, please see the footnote on page 2. Page 1 of 7 WEEKLY CONFLICT SUMMARY | 16 - 22 SEPTEMBER 2019 NORTHWEST SYRIA1 Government of Syria (GoS) aerial activity declined in the northwest during the week, with just one event in Kabani Town, compared to 23 events the previous period. However, GoS shelling continued to target communities in the Hayyat Tahrir ash Sham (HTS)-dominated northwest, with 139 events in 77 locations2 recorded during the week.
    [Show full text]
  • Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC)
    Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Name: Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Type of Organization: Military terrorist transnational violent Ideologies and Affiliations: Islamist Khomeinist Shiite state actor Place of Origin: Iran Year of Origin: 1979 Founder(s): Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini Places of Operation: Afghanistan, Europe, Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, South America, Syria Overview Also Known As: Islamic Revolutionary Guards Pasdaran (“Guards”) Revolutionary Guards Sepah (“Corps”) Sepah-e Pasdaran-e Enghelab-e Eslami (“Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps”) Executive Summary: The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) is tasked with preserving the Islamic Republic of Iran and the ideals of the 1979 revolution. The IRGC combines traditional military roles with a relentless focus on supposed domestic enemies. The IRGC is Iran’s primary instrument for exporting the ideology of the Islamic Revolution worldwide. It is rigidly loyal to Iran’s clerical elite. The IRGC is Iran’s main link to its terrorist proxies, which the regime uses to boost Iran’s global influence. Within the IRGC are the Basij militia and the Quds Force (IRGC-QF). The Basij, literally “mobilization,” is a paramilitary organization charged with channeling popular support for the Iranian regime. The Basij is famous for its recruitment of volunteers, many of them teenage children, for human wave attacks during the Iran-Iraq war. Today, the Basij has two missions: to provide defensive military training to protect the regime against foreign invasion, and to suppress domestic anti-regime activity through street violence and intimidation. After the contested 2009 Iranian presidential elections, for example, the Basij brutally quashed protests and attacked student dormitories. The IRGC’s Quds Force specializes in foreign missions, providing training, funding and weapons to extremist groups, including Iraqi insurgents, Hezbollah, and Hamas.
    [Show full text]
  • The Failure of Post-Conflict Reconstruction in Iraq
    BUILDING STATES, FAILING NATIONS: THE FAILURE OF POST-CONFLICT RECONSTRUCTION IN IRAQ Hawzhin Azeez B.A., M.A. A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy January 2013 Newcastle Business School, Faculty of Business and Law The University of Newcastle, Australia. The thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been made in the text. I give consent to the final version of my thesis being made available worldwide when deposited in the University’s Digital Repository**, subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. **Unless an Embargo has been approved for a determined period. Acknowledgements The completion of this thesis would not have been possible without the support of my supervisors Dr. Robert Imre and Dr. Tod Moore. Dr. Imre came on board at an exceptionally crucial time and rescued my confidence and desire to proceed with my research. Since then, his constant guidance and support, particularly in the form of emotional support and motivation has been profound in encouraging me to continue with the research. Dr. Imre has also been crucial in encouraging my confidence in teaching, one of my life's greatest passions, in addition to supporting my efforts at publications. Dr. Tod Moore likewise inherited a haphazard thesis and provided valuable feedback and support which was crucial to the completion of the thesis.
    [Show full text]