Navin Ramgoolam
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Corrigé Corrected
Corrigé Corrected CR 2018/20 International Court Cour internationale of Justice de Justice THE HAGUE LA HAYE YEAR 2018 Public sitting held on Monday 3 September 2018, at 10 a.m., at the Peace Palace, President Yusuf presiding, on the Legal Consequences of the Separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius in 1965 (Request for advisory opinion submitted by the General Assembly of the United Nations) ____________________ VERBATIM RECORD ____________________ ANNÉE 2018 Audience publique tenue le lundi 3 septembre 2018, à 10 heures, au Palais de la Paix, sous la présidence de M. Yusuf, président, sur les Effets juridiques de la séparation de l’archipel des Chagos de Maurice en 1965 (Demande d’avis consultatif soumise par l’Assemblée générale des Nations Unies) ________________ COMPTE RENDU ________________ - 2 - Present: President Yusuf Vice-President Xue Judges Tomka Abraham Bennouna Cançado Trindade Donoghue Gaja Sebutinde Bhandari Robinson Gevorgian Salam Iwasawa Registrar Couvreur - 3 - Présents : M. Yusuf, président Mme Xue, vice-présidente MM. Tomka Abraham Bennouna Cançado Trindade Mme Donoghue M. Gaja Mme Sebutinde MM. Bhandari Robinson Gevorgian Salam Iwasawa, juges M. Couvreur, greffier - 4 - The Republic of Mauritius is represented by: H.E. Sir Anerood Jugnauth, G.C.S.K., K.C.M.G., Q.C., Minister Mentor, Minister of Defence, Minister for Rodrigues of the Republic of Mauritius, as Head of Delegation (from 3 to 5 September 2018); Mr. Nayen Koomar Ballah, G.O.S.K., Secretary to Cabinet and Head of the Civil Service, Mr. Dheerendra Kumar Dabee, G.O.S.K., S.C., Solicitor General, H.E. Mr. Jagdish Dharamchand Koonjul, G.O.S.K., Ambassador and Permanent Representative of the Republic of Mauritius to the United Nations in New York, Ms Shiu Ching Young Kim Fat, Minister Counsellor, Prime Minister’s Office, Mr. -
Le Premier Ministre Devrait Annoncer La Fin De La Session Dissolution Parlementaire Ce Week-End Ou En Début De Semaine
N°4 - SAMEDI 5 OCTOBRE 2019 - GRATUIT ZORDI.MU LE PREMIER MINISTRE DEVRAIT ANNONCER LA FIN DE LA SESSION DISSOLUTION PARLEMENTAIRE CE WEEK-END OU EN DÉBUT DE SEMAINE. SANS QUE LE CHILDREN'S BILL AIT IMMINENTE ÉTÉ VOTÉ. LES PARTIS POLITIQUES S'APPRÊTENT DONC À NÉGOCIER LE DERNIER VIRAGE AVANT LE SPRINT VERS LES ÉLECTIONS GÉNÉRALES. P.3 TIANJIN EN CHINE ENQUÊTES BÂCLÉES : DENI DE JUSTICE JEAN-MICHEL LEE SHIM QUAND LA VILLE NI COUPABLES, NI INNOCENTS «DES AGENTS VOUS SURVEILLE P. 14-15 P. 10-11 DE TOUS LES PARTIS TRAVAILLENT POUR SOLIDARITE MARYE PIKE» P. 8-9 ZORDI [5 OCTOBRE 2019] Laktialite 2 Metro Express L’Inde a entièrement financé la première phase du projet à hauteur de L’Inde et Maurice Rs 18,8 milliards. Une collabo- ration qui a été grandement saluée par le Premier ministre font route ensemble Pravind Jugnauth. S’il y a un nom qui est revenu sans cesse dans le également pas raté l’occasion de faire ressortir que ce soft ministre, cela démontre une nouvelle fois l’affection de discours du Premier ministre et ministre des Finances, launch illustre bien la transformation qui est en train de l’Inde pour Maurice. Narendra Modi a, pour sa part, Pravind Jugnauth, à l’occasion du soft-launch du Metro s’opérer à Maurice. «Nous sommes en train d’améliorer la vie salué le «leadership visionnaire» de Pravind Jugnauth Express, le jeudi 3 octobre, c’est bien celui de son de tout le monde. Nous sommes une nation. Aujourd’hui nous qui a, selon lui, voulu des infrastructures et services homologue indien, Narendra Modi. -
(Hansard) First Session Tuesday 16 November 2010
1 No. 15 of 2010 FIFTH NATIONAL ASSEMBLY PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) FIRST SESSION TUESDAY 16 NOVEMBER 2010 2 CONTENTS PAPERS LAID QUESTIONS (ORAL) MOTION – SUSPENSION OF S.O. 10 (2) STATEMENTS BY MINISTERS MOTION - GOVERNMENT PROGRAMME 2010-2015 ADJOURNMENT QUESTIONS (WRITTEN) 3 Members Members THE CABINET (Formed by Dr. the Hon. Navinchandra Ramgoolam) Dr. the Hon. Navinchandra Ramgoolam, GCSK, Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs FRCP and External Communications Dr. the Hon. Ahmed Rashid Beebeejaun, GCSK, Deputy Prime Minister, Minister of Energy and FRCP Public Utilities Hon. Charles Gaëtan Xavier-Luc Duval, GCSK Vice-Prime Minister, Minister of Social Integration and Economic Empowerment Hon. Pravind Kumar Jugnauth Vice-Prime Minister, Minister of Finance and Economic Development Hon. Anil Kumar Bachoo Minister of Public Infrastructure, National Development Unit, Land Transport and Shipping Dr. the Hon. Arvin Boolell Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade Dr. the Hon. Abu Twalib Kasenally, FRCS Minister of Housing and Lands Hon. Mrs Sheilabai Bappoo, GOSK Minister of Gender Equality, Child Development and Family Welfare Hon. Nandcoomar Bodha Minister of Tourism and Leisure Dr. the Hon. Vasant Kumar Bunwaree Minister of Education and Human Resources Hon. Satya Veryash Faugoo Minister of Agro-Industry and Food Security Hon. Showkutally Soodhun Minister of Industry and Commerce Hon. Devanand Virahsawmy, GOSK Minister of Environment and Sustainable Development Dr. the Hon. Rajeshwar Jeetah Minister of Tertiary Education, Science, Research and Technology 4 Hon. Satyaprakash Ritoo Minister of Youth and Sports Hon. Mrs Leela Devi Dookun-Luchoomun Minister of Social Security, National Solidarity and Reform Institutions Hon. Louis Hervé Aimée Minister of Local Government and Outer Islands Hon. -
Fifth National Assembly
1 No. 11 of 2010 FIFTH NATIONAL ASSEMBLY PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) FIRST SESSION TUESDAY 10 AUGUST 2010 CONTENTS 2 PAPERS LAID QUESTIONS (Oral) MOTIONS SUSPENSION OF S.O. 10 (2) GOVERNMENT PROGRAMME 2010-2015 ADJOURNMENT QUESTIONS (Written) 3 Members Members THE CABINET (Formed by Dr. the Hon. Navinchandra Ramgoolam) Dr. the Hon. Navinchandra Ramgoolam, GCSK, FRCP Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications Dr. the Hon. Ahmed Rashid Beebeejaun, GCSK, FRCP Deputy Prime Minister, Minister of Energy and Public Utilities Hon. Charles Gaëtan Xavier-Luc Duval, GCSK Vice-Prime Minister, Minister of Social Integration and Economic Empowerment Hon. Pravind Kumar Jugnauth Vice-Prime Minister, Minister of Finance and Economic Development Hon. Anil Kumar Bachoo Minister of Public Infrastructure, National Development Unit, Land Transport and Shipping Dr. the Hon. Arvin Boolell Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade Dr. the Hon. Abu Twalib Kasenally, FRCS Minister of Housing and Lands Hon. Mrs Sheilabai Bappoo, GOSK Minister of Gender Equality, Child Development and Family Welfare Hon. Nandcoomar Bodha Minister of Tourism and Leisure Dr. the Hon. Vasant Kumar Bunwaree Minister of Education and Human Resources Hon. Satya Veryash Faugoo Minister of Agro-Industry and Food Security Hon. Showkutally Soodhun Minister of Industry and Commerce Hon. Devanand Virahsawmy, GOSK Minister of Environment and Sustainable Development Dr. the Hon. Rajeshwar Jeetah Minister of Tertiary Education, Science, Research and Technology Hon. Satyaprakash Ritoo Minister of Youth and Sports Hon. Mrs Leela Devi Dookun-Luchoomun Minister of Social Security, National Solidarity and Reform Institutions Hon. Louis Hervé Aimée Minister of Local Government and Outer Islands Hon. -
Mauritius Times Epaper 5 March 2021
66th Year -- No. 3657 Friday, March 5, 2021 www.mauritiustimes.com facebook.com/mauritius.times 18 Pages - ePaper MAURITIUS TIMES l A good leader is a person who takes a little more than his share of the blame and a little less than his share of the credit. - John Maxwell Interview: Rama Sithanen - Economist & Former MOF “The Bérenger-Duval coalition risks transforming an already divided country into a cleaved and a polarised one between two distinct groups competing for political power” * See Pages 7-8-9 Shedding the Dead Sea mentality Need to remain focused There was a time in this country when the focus was not so We owe it to the young and future generations to clear the much on power per se as on what positive changes that appalling mess and trigger the sea change necessary to power could bring about for the betterment of the citizenry establish a significantly better order Dr R Neerunjun Gopee * See Page 3 By Mrinal Roy * See Page 3 By Hanna Zagefka, Vaccine nationalism will block our Professor of Social Psychology, path out of the pandemic - so how Royal Holloway * See Page 2 do we resist our tribal instinct? Mauritius Times Friday, March 5, 2021 www.mauritiustimes.com Edit Page facebook.com/mauritius.times 2 The Political Cauldron: More Muddling The Conversation t is widely known that the leader of the him to establish his credentials as a potential Vaccine nationalism will block our MMM, Paul Berenger, has the knack to com- leader of the LP. Imit political blunders - and that is what has The question now is: What happens next? -
THE FORMATION, COLLAPSE and REVIVAL of POLITICAL PARTY COALITIONS in MAURITIUS Ethnic Logic and Calculation at Play *
VOLUME 4 NO 1 133 THE FORMATION, COLLAPSE AND REVIVAL OF POLITICAL PARTY COALITIONS IN MAURITIUS Ethnic Logic and Calculation at Play * By Denis K Kadima and Roukaya Kasenally ** Denis K Kadima is the Executive Director of EISA. P O Box 740 Auckland Park 2006 Johannesburg Tel: +27 (0) 11 482.5495; Fax: +27 (0) 11 482.6163 e-mail: [email protected] Dr Roukaya Kasenally is a media and political communication specialist and teaches in the Faculty of Social Studies and Humanities at the University of Mauritius. Reduit, Mauritius Tel: +230 454 1041; Fax: +230 686 4000 e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Coalitions and alliances are a regular feature of the Mauritian political landscape. The eight post-independence general elections have all been marked by electoral accords where those expecting to retain power or those aspiring to be in power hedge their bets by forming alliances with partners that ensure that they will be elected. Another fascinating feature is that, apart from that in 1976, all these coalitions have been formed before the election, allowing each party leader to engage in a series of tactical and bargaining strategies to ensure that his party gets a fair deal and, more recently, an equal deal, where the alliance partners shared the post of Prime Minister. The purpose of this paper is to shed some light on this under- researched area and to offer some explanation of the different mechanisms that exist * The authors acknowledge with gratitude the Konrad Adenauer Foundation, Johannesburg, and the Embassy of Finland, Pretoria, who funded the project. -
Women and Politics in a Plural Society: the Case of Mauritius
Town The copyright of this thesis rests with the University of Cape Town. No quotation from it or information derivedCape from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of theof source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non-commercial research purposes only. University WOMEN AND POLITICS IN A PLURAL SOCIETY: THE CASE OF MAURITIUS Town Ramola RAMTOHULCape of Dissertation submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the UniversityAfrican Gender Institute University of Cape Town February 2009 Women and Politics in a Plural Society: The Case of Mauritius ABSTRACT This research is a socio-historical study of women and politics in the Indian Ocean Island of Mauritius. It traces the historical evolution of women‟s political engagement in social and women‟s movements as well as in the formal political institutions. The backdrop to this study was my interest in the field of women and politics and concern on women‟s marginal presence in the Mauritian parliament since women obtained the right to vote and stand for election in 1947, and until recently, the stark silences on this issue in the country. Mauritius experienced sustained democracy following independence and gained a solid reputation in terms of its stable democratic regime and economic success. Despite these achievements, the Mauritian democracy is deficient with regard to women‟s representation at the highest level of decision-making, in parliament. Moreover, the absence of documentation on this topic has rendered the scope of thisTown study broad. In this thesis I primarily draw on the postcolonial feminist writings to study women‟s political activism in social and women‟s movements. -
2010 AGTF Newsletter
Aapravasi Ghat Trust Fund NEWSLETTER Volume 1 No 8 2 NoVEMBER 2010 s e v i h c r A n o i t a r g i m m I I G M aRchaEoLogIcaL RESEaRch aT TRIaNoN hERITagE SITE tion) (AGTF Collec Illustration of the foundations uncovered during the archaeological works which gives a tentative indication of the extent of this large structure A team of Archaeologists composed of Dr Diego Calaon from the Università Ca’ Foscari in Venice (Italy), Dr Saša Čaval from the Intitut za Courtesy of Dr K Seetah antropološke in prostorske študije, in Ljubljana (Slovenia), Dr Aleks Shows a drainage system that may have Pluskowski from Reading University (UK) and Dr Krish Seetah from been associated with this large structure McDonald Institute & University of Central Lancashire (UK) conducted archaeological excavations at Trianon Heritage Site from 6 to 17 July 2010. Quarter Rupee coin found during excavation WoRkShop oN “BhojpuRI aT ThE cRoSSRoaDS” From 13 to 15 July 2010, AGTF organised a workshop on Bhojpuri heritage at the University of Mauritius. The workshop aimed at reinforcing collaboration between research institutions and discussing future research programme for Bhojpuri cultures and traditions based on research undertaken in this field together with possible means of promotion and dissemination. The discussions focused on the impact of modernity on Bhojpuri languages and traditions on the similarities and differences between Bhojpuri traditions and cultures in Mauritius and India thanks (AGTF Collection) to the collaboration of Dr Archana Kumar, Associate Professor, Department of English, Banaras Hindu University in India and Chief Guest at the workshop. -
Disputes Over the British Indian Ocean Territory: a Survey RESEARCH PAPER 13/31 22 May 2013
Disputes over the British Indian Ocean Territory: a survey RESEARCH PAPER 13/31 22 May 2013 Between 1968 and 1973 the British Government cleared the entire Chagos Archipelago of its inhabitants, opening the way for a US military base on the biggest island, Diego Garcia. The Archipelago was made a British overseas territory, the British Indian Ocean Territory (BIOT). Two main disputes have arisen from these events. One has been between the Chagos Islanders and the British Government over the legality of the former’s removal and whether they have a right to return. The other has been between the UK and Mauritius about sovereignty over the BIOT. The UK has said that it will cede sovereignty to Mauritius once the BIOT is no longer required for defence purposes. Can progress be made towards resolving these disputes? Both have at various points in the past appeared to be all but intractable and several domestic and international legal challenges remain in play. But potential ways forward over the next two years are certainly not beyond the bounds of imagination. The British Government is currently reviewing its policy on resettlement, with supporters of the Chagos Islanders arguing that the outer islands of the Archipelago could be feasible sites for limited resettlement. And while the arrangement with the US over its military use of Diego Garcia looks set to be extended for a further 20 years from 2016, some are asking whether, if the outer islands of the BIOT are not required for defence purposes, they could be ceded to Mauritius as an interim step. -
Mauritius V United Kingdom
ARBITRATION UNDER ANNEX VII OF THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF THE SEA MAURITIUS v. UNITED KINGDOM COUNTER-MEMORIAL SUBMITTTED BY THE UNITED KINGDOM 15 JULY 2013 CONTENTS CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION…………………………………………… 1 A: Summary of proceedings…………………………………………………… 1 B: General observations………………………………………………………..... 3 C: Organisation of the Counter-Memorial……………………………………..... 5 PART ONE: THE FACTS…………………………………………………….. 7 CHAPTER II: GEOGRAPHICAL, CONSTITUTIONAL AND DIPLOMATIC BACKGROUND……………………………………………... 8 A: Geography of the British Indian Ocean Territory and of the Republic of Mauritius………………………………………………………………………… 8 (i) The British Indian Ocean Territory………………………………..… 8 (ii) The Republic of Mauritius……………………………………………. 11 B: The constitutional history of the Chagos Archipelago/ British Indian Ocean Territory………………………………………………………………………..... 11 (i) Cession to the United Kingdom……………………………………… 12 (ii) British administration as a Lesser Dependency (1814-1965)………… 12 (iii) The British Indian Ocean Territory: establishment and constitutional evolution……………………………………………………………... 16 C: The constitutional history of Mauritius……………………………………..... 18 D: The 5 November 1965 agreement by the Mauritius Council of Ministers to 22 the establishment of the BIOT………………………………………………… E: Debate in the UN General Assembly in 1965/1967 and subsequently………. 31 (i) UNGA resolutions 2066(XX), 2232(XXI) and 2357(XXII)………… 31 (ii) Mauritian statements in the UNGA after Independence and UK replies…………………………………………………………………. 34 F: Subsequent relations between Mauritius and the United Kingdom concerning the BIOT………………………………………………………………………… 38 (i) Fishing in the BIOT and the ‘fishing rights’ understanding…….......... 38 (ii) The mineral rights understanding…………………………………….. 45 Figure 2.1: Geographical Setting of BIOT and Mauritius…………………... 48 Figure 2.2: 200 Nautical Mile Zones of BIOT and Mauritius……………….. 49 Figure 2.3: British Indian Ocean Territory: Chagos Archipelago………….. 50 Figure 2.4: Fishing Licences Issued by BIOT from 1991 to 30 March 2010. -
Written Statement, Mauritius Submits As Follows
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE SEPARATION OF THE CHAGOS ARCHIPELAGO FROM MAURITIUS IN 1965 (REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION) Written Statement of the Republic of Mauritius VOLUME I 1 March 2018 Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................1 I. The involvement of the U.N. General Assembly .............7 II. The questions posed by the U.N. General Assembly .....11 III. Summary of Mauritius’ Written Statement ....................14 CHAPTER 2 GEOGRAPHY AND COLONIAL HISTORY .....................................23 I. Introduction ....................................................................23 II. Geography ......................................................................23 III. Early and colonial history ..............................................29 IV. The Chagos Archipelago has always been an integral part of the territory of Mauritius .......................34 A. Constitutional, legislative and administrative arrangements ..............................34 B. Economic, cultural and social links ....................39 C. Recognition of the Chagos Archipelago as an integral part of the territory of Mauritius ............................................................43 V. Conclusion ......................................................................53 CHAPTER 3 THE PROCESS OF DECOLONISATION AND THE DETACHMENT OF THE CHAGOS ARCHIPELAGO FROM MAURITIUS ...............................................................................55 -
REPUBLIC of MAURITIUS V. UNITED KINGDOM OF
ARBITRATION UNDER ANNEX VII OF THE 1982 UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF THE SEA REPUBLIC OF MAURITIUS v. UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND REPLY OF THE REPUBLIC OF MAURITIUS VOLUME I 18 November 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1:! INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................1! (a)! The UK’s argument on self-determination ......................................................2! (b)! Documents disclosed by the UK in the English judicial review proceedings ..................................................................................................2! (c)! UK silences ......................................................................................................5! (d)! The nature and purpose of the “MPA” ............................................................6! (e)! Recognition of Mauritius’ Rights ....................................................................7! I.! The Structure of the Reply ............................................................................................8! (a)! The Factual Chapters of the Reply ..................................................................8! (b)! The Legal Chapters of the Reply .....................................................................9! CHAPTER 2:! HISTORICAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND ..............................13! I.! Introduction .................................................................................................................13! II.! The Chagos Archipelago has