DOCSLIB.ORG

Written Statement, Mauritius Submits As Follows

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Written Statement, Mauritius Submits As Follows INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE SEPARATION OF THE CHAGOS ARCHIPELAGO FROM MAURITIUS IN 1965 (REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION) Written Statement of the Republic of Mauritius VOLUME I 1 March 2018 Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................1 I. The involvement of the U.N. General Assembly .............7 II. The questions posed by the U.N. General Assembly .....11 III. Summary of Mauritius’ Written Statement ....................14 CHAPTER 2 GEOGRAPHY AND COLONIAL HISTORY .....................................23 I. Introduction ....................................................................23 II. Geography ......................................................................23 III. Early and colonial history ..............................................29 IV. The Chagos Archipelago has always been an integral part of the territory of Mauritius .......................34 A. Constitutional, legislative and administrative arrangements ..............................34 B. Economic, cultural and social links ....................39 C. Recognition of the Chagos Archipelago as an integral part of the territory of Mauritius ............................................................43 V. Conclusion ......................................................................53 CHAPTER 3 THE PROCESS OF DECOLONISATION AND THE DETACHMENT OF THE CHAGOS ARCHIPELAGO FROM MAURITIUS ...............................................................................55 I. Introduction ....................................................................55 II. The struggle for independence .......................................57 III. The secret plan to detach the Chagos Archipelago ........63 IV. The 1965 Constitutional Conference ..............................79 i A. Uncertainty about whether Mauritius would be granted independence .........................80 B. The U.K. had already decided to detach the Chagos Archipelago .....................................82 C. Mauritian Ministers opposed the detachment of the Chagos Archipelago .............84 D. The Colonial Secretary sought to obtain Mauritian Ministers’ “agreement” to detachment to shield the U.K. from domestic and international criticism ..................84 V. Private meetings on “defence matters” ..........................87 VI. Premier Ramgoolam’s meeting with Prime Minister Wilson ..............................................................91 VII. The Lancaster House Undertakings ...............................98 VIII. The formal detachment of the Chagos Archipelago ..................................................................104 IX. Subsequent actions, including the forcible removal of the inhabitants ............................................108 A. The forcible removal of the Chagossians .........110 B. The return of Aldabra, Farquhar and Desroches to Seychelles ...................................114 X. Conclusion ....................................................................116 CHAPTER 4 NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL REACTIONS TO THE DETACHMENT OF THE CHAGOS ARCHIPELAGO .......................119 I. Introduction ..................................................................119 II. The reaction of Mauritius .............................................119 A. Mauritius’ reaction to the detachment of the Chagos Archipelago ...............................121 ii B. Mauritius’ reaction to the announcement of a “Marine Protected Area” in and around the Chagos Archipelago .......................131 III. International reaction to the detachment of the Chagos Archipelago .....................................................135 A. Reaction at the United Nations .........................136 B. Reaction of the international community .........151 IV. Reaction to the forcible removal of the Chagossians ...156 V. Conclusion ....................................................................166 CHAPTER 5 THE COURT HAS JURISDICTION TO GIVE THE ADVISORY OPINION REQUESTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY, AND THERE ARE NO REASONS FOR THE COURT TO DECLINE TO GIVE IT ...............................................................................167 I. The Court Has jurisdiction to give the Advisory Opinion requested by the General Assembly in Resolution 71/292 ........................................................167 A. The General Assembly is an organ duly authorised to request an Advisory Opinion from the Court ..................................................168 B. The General Assembly has asked the Court to give an Advisory Opinion on legal questions ..................................................170 II. There are no compelling reasons for the Court to decline to give the Advisory Opinion that has been requested ..............................................................173 CHAPTER 6 THE DECOLONISATION OF MAURITIUS WAS NOT LAWFULLY COMPLETED WHEN MAURITIUS WAS GRANTED INDEPENDENCE IN 1968 ..........................................187 I. Introduction ..................................................................187 II. The legal principles governing decolonisation .............189 iii A. The Mandate system and the League of Nations .............................................................189 B. The Charter of the United Nations ...................191 C. The Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples .............................................................198 D. The practice of the Security Council ................208 III. Self-determination as the modus operandi of decolonisation ...............................................................212 IV. The fundamental elements of self-determination in the process of decolonisation ...................................216 V. The decolonisation of Mauritius was not lawfully completed in 1968 ........................................................228 A. The unit of self-determination was the entire territory of Mauritius ..............................228 B. The United Nations recognised the entire territory of Mauritius as the unit of self- determination ....................................................230 C. The decision of the administering power to dismember Mauritius prior to independence had no effect on the self-determination unit .....233 D. The right of self-determination had to be exercised according to the freely-expressed will of the people of the territory concerned ....235 E. The detachment of the Chagos Archipelago was carried out in secret without any attempt to ascertain the views of the people of Mauritius ..........................................238 F. The “agreement” of the Council of Ministers of Mauritius was not capable of meeting the requirements of self-determination ..................242 iv VI. Conclusion ....................................................................248 CHAPTER 7 THE CONSEQUENCES UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW ARISING FROM THE ADMINISTERING POWER’S CONTINUED ADMINISTRATION OF THE CHAGOS ARCHIPELAGO .........................................................................251 I. Introduction ..................................................................251 II. The Administering Power’s continued administration of the Chagos Archipelago is a continuing internationally wrongful act that must cease .............................................................................253 III. The unlawful colonial administration of part of Mauritius’ territory must be brought to an immediate end ..............................................................255 A. Immediate cessation is required .......................255 B. Full decolonisation of Mauritius can and should be achieved immediately ......................259 IV. The legal consequences while decolonisation is being completed ...........................................................270 V. The legal consequences that apply to third States and international organisations .....................................280 CONCLUSIONS................................................................................................. 285 LIST OF ANNEXES .......................................................................................... 289 v CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 On 22 June 2017, the United Nations General Assembly, by a vote of 94 to 15, adopted Resolution 71/292, which requested the Court to render the present Advisory Opinion pursuant to Article 65 of its Statute. On 14 July 2017, the Court fixed 30 January 2018 as the time-limit within which written statements may be submitted to the Court by the United Nations and its Member States, in accordance with Article 66, paragraph 2 of its Statute. On 17 January 2018, the Court adopted an Order by which it extended the time-limit for the filing of written statements to 1 March 2018. This Written Statement is submitted by Mauritius pursuant to the Order of the Court. *** 1.2 The request from the General Assembly asks the Court to render an Advisory Opinion on the completion of the decolonisation of Mauritius, which attained its independence on 12 March 1968. The Chagos Archipelago was purportedly detached from the colonial territory of Mauritius three years earlier, by an Order in Council dated 8 November 1965. By that time, the United Nations had played a central role in the process of decolonisation for the two decades since its inception. 1.3 On 14 December 1960, the General Assembly adopted, by a vote of 89 votes to none, the Declaration on the Granting of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • This Keyword List Contains Indian Ocean Place Names of Coral Reefs, Islands, Bays and Other Geographic Features in a Hierarchical Structure
    CoRIS Place Keyword Thesaurus by Ocean - 8/9/2016 Indian Ocean This keyword list contains Indian Ocean place names of coral reefs, islands, bays and other geographic features in a hierarchical structure. For example, the first name on the list - Bird Islet - is part of the Addu Atoll, which is in the Indian Ocean. The leading label - OCEAN BASIN - indicates this list is organized according to ocean, sea, and geographic names rather than country place names. The list is sorted alphabetically. The same names are available from “Place Keywords by Country/Territory - Indian Ocean” but sorted by country and territory name. Each place name is followed by a unique identifier enclosed in parentheses. The identifier is made up of the latitude and longitude in whole degrees of the place location, followed by a four digit number. The number is used to uniquely identify multiple places that are located at the same latitude and longitude. For example, the first place name “Bird Islet” has a unique identifier of “00S073E0013”. From that we see that Bird Islet is located at 00 degrees south (S) and 073 degrees east (E). It is place number 0013 at that latitude and longitude. (Note: some long lines wrapped, placing the unique identifier on the following line.) This is a reformatted version of a list that was obtained from ReefBase. OCEAN BASIN > Indian Ocean OCEAN BASIN > Indian Ocean > Addu Atoll > Bird Islet (00S073E0013) OCEAN BASIN > Indian Ocean > Addu Atoll > Bushy Islet (00S073E0014) OCEAN BASIN > Indian Ocean > Addu Atoll > Fedu Island (00S073E0008)
    [Show full text]
  • Narratives of Oppression Michael Tigar American University Washington College of Law
    Human Rights Brief Volume 17 | Issue 1 Article 6 2009 Narratives of Oppression Michael Tigar American University Washington College of Law Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/hrbrief Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, and the Human Rights Law Commons Recommended Citation Tigar, Michael. "Narratives of Oppression." Human Rights Brief 17, no. 1 (2009): 34-38. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington College of Law Journals & Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Human Rights Brief by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Tigar: Narratives of Oppression Narratives of Oppression by Michael Tigar The following piece is based on Professor Michael Tigar’s keynote address delivered at the “Strategic Litigation in International and Domestic Fora” event on October 12, 2009, at the American University Washington College of Law (WCL). Professor Tigar is a Professor Emeritus at WCL and a Professor of the Practice of Law at Duke Law School. Ten years ago, he founded the UNROW Human Rights Impact Litigation Clinic, which has represented, among others, the indigenous people from the Chagos Archipelago in their lawsuit in United States federal court. The Chagossians were forcibly uprooted from their homeland in the Indian Ocean in the 1960s and 1970s by the United States and the United Kingdom to make way for the U.S. military base on Diego Garcia. lthough I hope there are some general lessons to be drawn from my remarks, I am going to focus today Tigar.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds of the British Indian Ocean Territory, Chagos Archipelago, Central Indian Ocean Peter Carr
    CARR: Birds of Chagos 57 Birds of the British Indian Ocean Territory, Chagos Archipelago, central Indian Ocean Peter Carr Carr, P., 2015. Birds of the British Indian Ocean Territory, Chagos Archipelago, central Indian Ocean. Indian BIRDS 10 (3&4): 57–70. Peter Carr, 80 Links Way, Beckenham, Kent, England, UK, BR3 3DQ. E-mail: [email protected]. Manuscript received on 02 June 2015. Introduction from three directions, the east, north and west and seabird The Chagos Archipelago lies at the end of the Chagos-Laccadive migrants from four, the north and south and dispersing east and Ridge and is some 500km due South of the Maldives archipelago. west along the equatorial counter current systems.” Observations It is the final termini for migrating organisms heading South in post-1971 have proven that Bourne’s words were prophetic; the central Indian Ocean. It is made up of five islanded atolls landbird and seabird vagrants and migrants are an exciting aspect centred upon the Great Chagos Bank, the largest atoll structure of birding in the Chagos. The vast majority of migratory species in the world. The climate is tropical oceanic, hot and humid yet are of northern hemisphere origin (though there is evidence moderated by trade winds. Mean monthly temperatures vary that a limited number of vagrants are from the east and west) from a maximum of 30.75°C in March to a minimum of 28.03°C and are generally present in the archipelago from September in August. The northern atolls of the archipelago are the wettest through to March. As more ornithological research is conducted in the Indian Ocean (Stoddart & Taylor 1971).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Executive Summary Mauritius Is an Upper Middle-Income Island Nation
    Executive Summary Mauritius is an upper middle-income island nation of 1.2 million people and one of the most competitive, stable, and successful economies in Africa, with a Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of USD 11.9 billion and per capita GDP of over USD 9,000. Mauritius’ small land area of only 2,040 square kilometers understates its importance to the Indian Ocean region as it controls an Exclusive Economic Zone of more than 2 million square kilometers, one of the largest in the world. Emerging from the British colonial period in 1968 with a monoculture economy based on sugar production, Mauritius has since successfully diversified its economy into manufacturing and services, with a vibrant export sector focused on textiles, apparel, and jewelry as well as a growing, modern, and well-regulated offshore financial sector. Recently, the government of Mauritius has focused its attention on opportunities in three areas: serving as a platform for investment into Africa, moving the country towards renewable sources of energy, and developing economic activity related to the country’s vast oceanic resources. Mauritius actively seeks investment and seeks to service investment in the region, having signed more than forty Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements and maintaining a legal and regulatory framework that keeps Mauritius highly-ranked on “ease of doing business” and good governance indices. 1. Openness To, and Restrictions Upon, Foreign Investment Attitude Toward FDI Mauritius actively seeks and prides itself on being open to foreign investment. According to the World Bank report “Investing Across Borders,” Mauritius has one of the world’s most open economies to foreign ownership and is one of the highest recipients of FDI per capita.
    [Show full text]
  • Consolidating Democratic Governance in the Sadc Region: Mauritius
    CONSOLIDATING DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE IN THE SADC REGION: MAURITIUS CONSOLIDATING DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE IN THE SADC REGION: MAURITIUS StraConsult, Mauritius Study Commissioned by EISA 2008 Published by EISA 14 Park Rd, Richmond Johannesburg South Africa P O Box 740 Auckland Park 2006 South Africa Tel: 27 11 482 5495 Fax: 27 11 482 6163 Email: [email protected] www.eisa.org.za ISBN: 978-1-920095-85-7 © EISA All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of EISA. First published 2008 EISA is a non-partisan organisation which seeks to promote democratic principles, free and fair elections, a strong civil society and good governance at all levels of Southern African society. _____________ ____________ EISA Research Report, No. 37 EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 37 i PREFACE This research report is the culmination of a study undertaken by EISA focusing on the state of democratic governance in the Southern African region. The programme, implemented under the generic theme ‘Consolidating Democratic Governance in the SADC Region’, has evolved over a four-year period spanning 2003-2006. The research aims to investigate the state of democracy and governance in the Southern African Development Community (SADC) region, posing a key question as to whether or not the region has undergone democratic transition and, if so, posing a related question as to whether or not the region is firmly set on the road to democratic consolidation. The four key variables for the assessment of the state of democratic governance in this study are: representation and accountability; citizen participation; local governance; and economic management and corporate governance.
    [Show full text]
  • BARBADOS Latin America & Caribbean
    Country Profile BARBADOS Abc Region: Latin America & Caribbean 2020 EPI Country Rank (out of 180) GDP [PPP 2011$ billions] 4.7 77 GDP per capita [$] 16,464 2020 EPI Score [0=worst, 100=best] Population [millions] 0.3 45.6 Urbanization [%] 31.19 Country Scorecard Issue Categories Rank [/180] Environmental Health 38 60.7 Air Quality 32 66.0 Sanitation & Drinking Water 78 51.9 Heavy Metals 39 70.4 Waste Management 50 67.2 Ecosystem Vitality 145 35.6 Biodiversity & Habitat 177 12.6 Ecosystem Services 75 37.1 Fisheries 28 18.4 Climate Change 58 59.1 Pollution Emissions 102 53.3 Agriculture 170 11.9 Water Resources 104 1.1 Regional Average World Average epi.yale.edu Page 1 of 3 Country Profile BARBADOS Abc Region: Latin America & Caribbean 10-Year Regional Regional Rank EPI Score Change Rank Average Environmental Performance Index 77 45.6 +0.9 18 45.6 Environmental Health 38 60.7 +0.9 3 46.8 Air Quality 32 66 +1.3 2 46.9 Household solid fuels 28 96.5 +5.3 1 48.0 PM 2.5 exposure 90 40.7 -1.6 21 44.3 Ozone exposure 1 100 –- 1 65.7 Sanitation & Drinking Water 78 51.9 –- 9 47.0 Unsafe sanitation 71 58.3 +1.3 8 52.0 Unsafe drinking water 76 47.6 -0.8 9 43.6 Heavy Metals / Lead exposure 39 70.4 +3.6 4 50.8 Waste Management / Controlled solid waste 50 67.2 –- 7 42.2 Ecosystem Vitality 145 35.6 +1.0 30 44.7 Biodiversity & Habitat 177 12.6 +1.2 32 58.4 Terrestrial biomes (nat'l) 174 2.8 –- 32 73.3 Terrestrial biomes (global) 174 2.8 –- 32 71.4 Marine protected areas 113 0.1 –- 28 31.7 Protected Areas Representativeness Index 34 50.4 +10.9 20 52.4 Species
    [Show full text]
  • Family History Mauritius Twocol
    Our Ancestors from Mauritius Paul Francis, 2010 This is the story of our ancestors who came from Mauritius. 1 Early Days Mauritius had been uninhabited prior to The story of our Mauritian ancestors the arrival of the first European settlers. th starts on the 9 of April 1729. After a Its dense forests had been roamed by five month journey from St Malo in dodos, their close relation the solitaire, France, the wooden sailing ship “Royal and by tortoises so large that eight Philip” was at last about to arrive in people could stand on the back of one. Mauritius (then known as the Ile de All these had, however, been wiped out France). On board were the first 30 by the Dutch, who had established a volunteer French settlers, on their way number of abortive colonies on the to new lives in the new colony. And island during the seventeenth century, amongst them was Jean Toussaint Jocet before abandoning the island in 1710. de la Porte, his wife Jeanne Thérèse They had left behind feral monkeys and Thomas, and their two young children, rats. Without natural predators, the rats aged three and five. had overrun the island and grown to the size of rabbits. The colony on Ile de France was only Native Forests of Mauritius. eight years old. It was a private sector colony – established by the French East In 1729, when Jean and Jeanne arrived, India Company to act as a base for their the colony had about 100 French settlers trading ships in the Indian Ocean.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    Darwin Initiative Annual Report Important note: To be completed with reference to the Reporting Guidance Notes for Project Leaders: it is expected that this report will be about 10 pages in length, excluding annexes Submission Deadline: 30 April Project Reference 19-027 Project Title Strengthening the world’s largest Marine Protected Area: Chagos Archipelago Host Country/ies British Indian Ocean Territory (BIOT) Contract Holder Institution Bangor University Partner institutions University of Warwick, Zoological Society of London, FCO BIOT Administration Darwin Grant Value £287,788 Start/end dates of project 2012/13 – 2014/15 Reporting period (eg Apr 2013 2013-2014: Annual Report 2 – Mar 2014) and number (eg Annual Report 1, 2, 3) Project Leader name Dr John R Turner Project website Chagos Environment Outreach Project: http://www.zsl.org/conservation/regions/africa/chagos- coral/chagos-community,1915,AR.html http://www.zsl.org/regions/uk-and-overseas-territories/chagos- archipelago Scientific Expedition 2014: http://chagos-trust.org/2014-biot- expedition Report author(s) and date Dr John Turner, Prof Charles Sheppard, Dr Heather Koldewey, Rebecca Short and Audrey Blancart contributed to report and/or annexes. June 2014. Project Goal: To strengthen the Chagos Marine Protected Area by providing scientific knowledge for effective management, and develop a strategy that engages the support of potential stakeholders through outreach, education and engagement. The legacy will be sound management and increased value of what is currently the world’s largest no-take Marine Protected Area and a unique and globally important reference site. Location: The Chagos archipelago is situated in the middle of the Indian Ocean at the southernmost end of the Laccadive-Chagos ridge.
    [Show full text]
  • British Overseas Territories Law
    British Overseas Territories Law Second Edition Ian Hendry and Susan Dickson HART PUBLISHING Bloomsbury Publishing Plc Kemp House , Chawley Park, Cumnor Hill, Oxford , OX2 9PH , UK HART PUBLISHING, the Hart/Stag logo, BLOOMSBURY and the Diana logo are trademarks of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc First published in Great Britain 2018 First edition published in 2011 Copyright © Ian Hendry and Susan Dickson , 2018 Ian Hendry and Susan Dickson have asserted their right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 to be identifi ed as Authors of this work. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publishers. While every care has been taken to ensure the accuracy of this work, no responsibility for loss or damage occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any statement in it can be accepted by the authors, editors or publishers. All UK Government legislation and other public sector information used in the work is Crown Copyright © . All House of Lords and House of Commons information used in the work is Parliamentary Copyright © . This information is reused under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 ( http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/ open-government-licence/version/3 ) except where otherwise stated. All Eur-lex material used in the work is © European Union, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/ , 1998–2018. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity: the UK Overseas Territories. Peterborough, Joint Nature Conservation Committee
    Biodiversity: the UK Overseas Territories Compiled by S. Oldfield Edited by D. Procter and L.V. Fleming ISBN: 1 86107 502 2 © Copyright Joint Nature Conservation Committee 1999 Illustrations and layout by Barry Larking Cover design Tracey Weeks Printed by CLE Citation. Procter, D., & Fleming, L.V., eds. 1999. Biodiversity: the UK Overseas Territories. Peterborough, Joint Nature Conservation Committee. Disclaimer: reference to legislation and convention texts in this document are correct to the best of our knowledge but must not be taken to infer definitive legal obligation. Cover photographs Front cover: Top right: Southern rockhopper penguin Eudyptes chrysocome chrysocome (Richard White/JNCC). The world’s largest concentrations of southern rockhopper penguin are found on the Falkland Islands. Centre left: Down Rope, Pitcairn Island, South Pacific (Deborah Procter/JNCC). The introduced rat population of Pitcairn Island has successfully been eradicated in a programme funded by the UK Government. Centre right: Male Anegada rock iguana Cyclura pinguis (Glen Gerber/FFI). The Anegada rock iguana has been the subject of a successful breeding and re-introduction programme funded by FCO and FFI in collaboration with the National Parks Trust of the British Virgin Islands. Back cover: Black-browed albatross Diomedea melanophris (Richard White/JNCC). Of the global breeding population of black-browed albatross, 80 % is found on the Falkland Islands and 10% on South Georgia. Background image on front and back cover: Shoal of fish (Charles Sheppard/Warwick
    [Show full text]
  • Additional International Service Terms and Conditions
    Additional International Service Terms and Conditions International Applied Charges: International calls that begin in one rate period and end in another rate period will be charged the rate in effect at the time the connection is established. Telecommunications Relay Service (“TRS”) Discount: TRS service "includes domestic interstate and international calls." "International calls placed through the MCI National TRS Center are not eligible for discounts." Casual (Non-Account) Calling Surcharge: $5.50 per-call surcharge is applicable to international calls placed by Casual Callers. International Direct Dial Calling rates apply. Operator Assistance Service Operator Assistance service is available with rates that apply 24 hours a day and seven days a week. The rates apply to calls that originate in the U.S. Mainland and Hawaii and terminate in the international locations identified in a separate table. Call usage will be calculated on a 60-second minimum duration basis with additional 60-second increments.. Operator Assistance surcharges will apply. Below is a list of international locations that may be reached only with the assistance of an operator. Operator services surcharges do not apply to calls made to these locations. COUNTRY COUNTRY CODE NAME ------------- ------------------------- 246 BRITISH INDIAN OCEAN 246 CHAGOS ARCHIPELAGO 246 DANGER ISLAND 246 DIEGO GARCIA 246 EAGLE ISLANDS 246 EGMONT ISLAND 246 NELSONS ISLAND 246 PEROS BANHOS 246 SALOMON ISLANDS 246 THREE BROTHERS 258 MOZAMBIQUE 675 NEW BRITIAN 675 NEW GUINEA 675 NEW IRELAND 675 ADMIRALITY ISLANDS 675 BISMRK ARCHPLGO ISL 690 TOKELAU ISLAND 808 MIDWAY ISLANDS (US) 808 WAKE ISLAND (US) 850 KOREA, NORTH 872 PITCAIRN ISLAND International Maritime Satellite (INMARSAT) Special rates apply to calls that involve International Maritime Satellite (INMARSAT) Calling.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 1 Comprehensive International Points List
    Table 1 Comprehensive International Points List FCC ITU-T Country Region Dialing FIPS Comments, including other 1 Code Plan Code names commonly used Abu Dhabi 5 971 TC include with United Arab Emirates Aden 5 967 YE include with Yemen Admiralty Islands 7 675 PP include with Papua New Guinea (Bismarck Arch'p'go.) Afars and Assas 1 253 DJ Report as 'Djibouti' Afghanistan 2 93 AF Ajman 5 971 TC include with United Arab Emirates Akrotiri Sovereign Base Area 9 44 AX include with United Kingdom Al Fujayrah 5 971 TC include with United Arab Emirates Aland 9 358 FI Report as 'Finland' Albania 4 355 AL Alderney 9 44 GK Guernsey (Channel Islands) Algeria 1 213 AG Almahrah 5 967 YE include with Yemen Andaman Islands 2 91 IN include with India Andorra 9 376 AN Anegada Islands 3 1 VI include with Virgin Islands, British Angola 1 244 AO Anguilla 3 1 AV Dependent territory of United Kingdom Antarctica 10 672 AY Includes Scott & Casey U.S. bases Antigua 3 1 AC Report as 'Antigua and Barbuda' Antigua and Barbuda 3 1 AC Antipodes Islands 7 64 NZ include with New Zealand Argentina 8 54 AR Armenia 4 374 AM Aruba 3 297 AA Part of the Netherlands realm Ascension Island 1 247 SH Ashmore and Cartier Islands 7 61 AT include with Australia Atafu Atoll 7 690 TL include with New Zealand (Tokelau) Auckland Islands 7 64 NZ include with New Zealand Australia 7 61 AS Australian External Territories 7 672 AS include with Australia Austria 9 43 AU Azerbaijan 4 994 AJ Azores 9 351 PO include with Portugal Bahamas, The 3 1 BF Bahrain 5 973 BA Balearic Islands 9 34 SP include
    [Show full text]