The Death Penalty in Botswana Hasty and Secretive Hangings
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
DITSHWANELO - The Botswana Centre for Human Rights THE DEATH PENALTY IN BOTSWANA HASTY AND SECRETIVE HANGINGS International Fact-finding Mission This photo is of one prisoner's grave, dug in the prison graveyard just before his planned execution in 1999. From The Botswana Guardian, 26 February 1999. FIDH acknowledges The Botswana Guardian, for the use of this picture. n° 473/2 - June 2007 THE DEATH PENALTY IN BOTSWANA HASTY AND SECRETIVE HANGINGS This report was produced with the support of the European Commission (European Initiative for Democracy and Human Rights - EIDHR) and the Fund for FIDH Missions. The opinions expressed in this document are those of FIDH only and can not be attributed to the European Union. FIDH-DITSHWANELO / P A G E 2 THE DEATH PENALTY IN BOTSWANA HASTY AND SECRETIVE HANGINGS Table of contents Foreword: Why Mobilise against the Death Penalty? . 4 I. Introduction . 7 1.1 Rationale of the mission . 7 1.2 Botswana in a nutshell . 8 1.3 Human rights instruments ratified by Botswana. 10 II. The Judicial System . 12 2.1 The Court System and Procedure. 12 2.1.1 Customary Law Courts . 12 2.1.2 Magistrate Courts . 12 2.1.3 The High Court . 13 2.1.4 The Court of Appeal of Botswana . 13 2.1.5 Courts Martial. 13 2.2 Criminal investigation and prosecution procedures . 14 2.2.1 Investigation. 14 2.2.2 Prosecution . 14 2.3 Pre trial phase and judgement . 14 2.3.1 Persons awaiting trials . 14 2.3.2 Trial phase. 15 III. The death penalty in Botswana . 18 3.1 Some Statistics . 18 3.2 The public opinion in Botswana . 18 3.3. Offences carrying the death penalty. 19 3.4. The trial . 19 3.4.1. Jurisdiction . 19 3.4.2. The right to a fair trial : The pro deo system in question. 20 3.4.3. Extenuating circumstances and mandatory death sentences . 22 3.5 Conditions of detention. 23 3.5.1 Preliminary remarks . 23 3.5.2 The Prisons Act. 23 3.6. Challenging the death penalty in Courts . 25 3.7 Post trial phase: hasty and secret executions. 26 3.7.1 The Clemency Committee: an opaque process. 26 3.7.2 Speedy executions: the issue of transparency . 27 IV. Conclusion and Recommendations. 30 Annexes . 33 1. Persons met by the mission . 33 2. List of persons executed since independence . 34 3. Overcrowding situation from January to October 2005 . 35 FIDH-DITSHWANELO / P A G E 3 THE DEATH PENALTY IN BOTSWANA HASTY AND SECRETIVE HANGINGS Foreword: Why Mobilise against the Death Penalty? FIDH is strongly opposed to the death penalty. FIDH imprisonment. The report of the Illinois Commission on considers it to be contrary to the very notions of human Capital Punishment stressed that: 'no system, given human dignity and liberty. Furthermore, the death penalty has nature and frailties, could ever be devised or constructed that been proved to be entirely ineffective as a deterrent. would work perfectly and guarantee absolutely that no Consequently, neither principles nor utilitarian innocent person is ever again sentenced to death'. considerations can justify the use of capital punishment. When innocent people are executed, "society as a whole - i.e. 1. The death penalty is inconsistent with all of us - in whose name the verdict was reached, becomes notions of human dignity and liberty collectively guilty because its justice system has made the supreme injustice possible" said Robert Badinter, French Human rights and human dignity are universally Minister of Justice, in 1981. For society as a whole, accepting acknowledged as fundamental norms that form the basis of the possibility of condemning innocent people to death is politically organised society. The death penalty directly entirely contrary to the fundamental principles of human contradicts this premise and is based on a misconception of dignity and justice. justice. Justice is based on human rights guarantees: The existence of Justice is based on freedom and dignity: a criminal can and human rights guarantees is the distinctive character of a should be punished only when he or she freely committed an reliable and legitimate judicial system; notably, the right to a act that disrupts the legal order. It is for this reason that fair trial - including, for example, the rejection of evidence minors and insane persons cannot be held responsible for obtained through torture or other inhuman and degrading their actions in a criminal justice system. treatment. From this perspective, FIDH is convinced that the full respect of these human rights and the rejection of legally Because it is irreversible, the death penalty presents a sanctioned violence are at the core of the legitimacy of any contradiction between the premise of its imposition-freedom criminal justice system. Justice, particularly when it concerns and conscience in acting-and the fundamental values of the most serious crimes and the life of the accused is at stake, human dignity and liberty, which make human and social should not rely on chance and fortune. The life of an individual change possible. should not depend on contingent factors such as jury selection, media pressure and the competence of a defence Human freedom is indeed defined as the possibility to attorney. The rejection of inhumane sentences, first and change and transcend a given life situation. In the case of the foremost the death penalty, clearly contributes to the building criminal justice system, this means there must be the of a judicial system based on universally accepted principles, redemptive opportunity for rehabilitation and re-socialisation. in which vengeance has no place and in which the population The irreversibility of the death penalty undermines this as a whole can trust. fundamental notion of freedom.