DOCSLIB.ORG

DISJOINTED FLUIDITY: a PROPOSITION for CONCEPTUALIZING and MODELING RELATIONAL PROCESSES by Jacqueline Joslyn a Dissertation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DISJOINTED FLUIDITY: a PROPOSITION for CONCEPTUALIZING and MODELING RELATIONAL PROCESSES by Jacqueline Joslyn a Dissertation Disjointed Fluidity: A Proposition for Conceptualizing and Modeling Relational Processes Item Type text; Electronic Dissertation Authors Joslyn, Jacqueline Citation Joslyn, Jacqueline. (2021). Disjointed Fluidity: A Proposition for Conceptualizing and Modeling Relational Processes (Doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA). Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction, presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 26/09/2021 09:51:02 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/658598 DISJOINTED FLUIDITY: A PROPOSITION FOR CONCEPTUALIZING AND MODELING RELATIONAL PROCESSES by Jacqueline Joslyn Copyright ©Jacqueline Joslyn 2021 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the SCHOOL OF SOCIOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2021 2 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Dissertation Committee, we certify that we have read the dissertation prepared by: Jacqueline Joslyn titled: and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. _________________________________________________________________ Date: ____________Mar 19, 2021 Joseph J Galaskiewicz _________________________________________________________________ Date: ____________Mar 19, 2021 Robin Stryker _________________________________________________________________ Date: ____________Mar 19, 2021 Ronald L Breiger _________________________________________________________________ Date: ____________Mar 19, 2021 Brian Hilligoss Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent upon the candidate’s submission of the final copies of the dissertation to the Graduate College. We hereby certify that we have read this dissertation prepared under our direction and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement. _________________________________________________________________ Date: ____________Mar 19, 2021 Joseph J Galaskiewicz Sociology _________________________________________________________________ Date: ____________Mar 19, 2021 Robin Stryker Sociology Acknowledgements I would like to express my deepest appreciation to my dissertation co-chairs, Joseph Galaskiewicz and Robin Stryker. Their astute advice, feedback, and encouragement has been so very instrumental to every aspect of this research. I am wholeheartedly grateful to my dissertation committee members, Ronald Breiger and Brian Hilligoss, for their generous guidance and suggestions. Thank you to the University of Arizona Graduate and Professional Student Council for providing funding for this research. I would like to recognize Nina Eliasoph and the Junior Theorists Symposium volunteers for providing critical feedback and allowing me to bring disjointed fluidity to the attention of the scholarly community. A special thank you to Corey Abramson for his valuable literature recommendations. I would also like to acknowledge Albert Bergesen. Our conversations were a valuable and cherished source of creative inspiration. I lovingly thank my friends and family for all the support, which I will forever pay forward. 3 Dedication To Carmela Joslyn (my mom), Clara Pasto (my grandma), and to all strong women: Thank you for giving me so many pixels to share. 4 Table of Contents Abstract ..................................................................................................................................... 9 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 10 About This Dissertation....................................................................................................... 13 Summary of Contents .......................................................................................................... 15 Chapter 1: Conceptualizing Relationships ............................................................................. 18 Relationships as Disjointedly Fluid Trajectories ................................................................ 19 The Disjointedness of Relationships ................................................................................... 20 The Fluidity of Relationships ............................................................................................. 21 Relationships as Trajectories .............................................................................................. 23 Key Phenomenological Traditions ...................................................................................... 24 What Does It Matter? .......................................................................................................... 28 Bringing It Together ............................................................................................................ 33 Chapter 2: Internal Mechanisms of Continuity ..................................................................... 39 Loss and Absence................................................................................................................. 39 Analysis I: Internal Mechanisms ........................................................................................ 42 Significance to the Study of Loss and Absence ................................................................... 52 Discussion............................................................................................................................. 54 Chapter 3: External Mechanisms of Continuity .................................................................... 57 Analysis II: External Mechanisms ...................................................................................... 58 Recap on Concepts and Mechanisms .................................................................................. 68 Case 1 ................................................................................................................................ 69 Case 2 ................................................................................................................................ 72 Case 3 ................................................................................................................................ 75 Chapter 4: Pixels and Flows ................................................................................................... 80 Making Disjointed Fluidity Useful ...................................................................................... 80 Time and Cognition as Primary Modeling Variables .......................................................... 81 Allowing Conceptual Constructs to Change ....................................................................... 83 Suspending Statistical Assumptions ................................................................................... 83 Pixels and Flows .................................................................................................................. 84 Analysis I: Pixel Trails ........................................................................................................ 88 Analysis II: Pixel Properties ................................................................................................ 97 Modeling Pixel Clusters and Intuitive Timelines ................................................................ 97 5 Passing and Absorbing Pixels........................................................................................... 105 Discussion........................................................................................................................... 111 Extending the Model ........................................................................................................ 112 Limitations and Uses ........................................................................................................ 114 Broader Significance ........................................................................................................ 117 Summary ............................................................................................................................ 117 Chapter 5: A Mixed Methods Analysis of Gender and Mentorship ................................... 119 Gender Culture in the Workplace .................................................................................... 120 Hypotheses ......................................................................................................................... 123 Data and Variables ............................................................................................................ 125 Statistical Analysis ............................................................................................................. 126 Discussion........................................................................................................................... 133 Summarizing the Story of Gender and Mentorship ......................................................... 137 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................. 141 Appendix A: Data and Methods ..........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cultural Theorizing Has Dramatically Increased
    Cultural CHAPTER 9 Theorizing Another Embarassing Confession Like the concept of social structure, the conceptualization of culture in sociology is rather vague, despite a great deal of attention by sociologists to the properties and dynamics of cul- ture. There has always been the recognition that culture is attached to social structures, and vice versa, with the result that sociologists often speak in terms of sociocultural formations or sociocultural systems and structures. This merging of structure and culture rarely clarifies but, instead, further conflates a precise definition of culture. And so, sociology’s big idea— culture—is much like the notion of social structure. Its conceptualization is somewhat meta- phorical, often rather imprecise, and yet highly evocative. There is no consensus in defini- tions of culture beyond the general idea that humans create symbol systems, built from our linguistic capacities, which are used to regulate conduct. And even this definition would be challenged by some. Since the 1980s and accelerating with each decade, the amount of cultural theorizing has dramatically increased. Mid-twentieth-century functional theory had emphasized the importance of culture but not in a context-specific or robust manner; rather, functional- ism viewed culture as a mechanism by which actions are controlled and regulated,1 whereas much of the modern revival of culture has viewed culture in a much more robust and inclusive manner. When conflict theory finally pushed functionalism from center stage, it also tended to bring forth a more Marxian view of culture as a “superstructure” generated by economic substructures. Culture became the sidekick, much like Tonto for the Lone Ranger, to social structure, with the result that its autonomy and force indepen- dent of social structures were not emphasized and, in some cases, not even recognized.
    [Show full text]
  • CULTURAL ANALYSIS the Work of Peter L. Berger, Mary Douglas, Michel Foucault, and Jürgen Habermas
    ROUTLEDGE LIBRARY EDITIONS: MICHEL FOUCAULT CULTURAL ANALYSIS CULTURAL ANALYSIS The Work of Peter L. Berger, Mary Douglas, Michel Foucault, and Jürgen Habermas ROBERT WUTHNOW, JAMES DAVISON HUNTER, ALBERT BERGESEN, EDITH KURZWEIL Volume 5 First published in 1984 This edition first published in 2010 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon, OX14 4RN Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 270 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business © Robert Wuthnow, James Davison Hunter, Albert Bergesen and Edith Kurzweil 1984 Printed and bound in Great Britain All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 10: 0-415-56195-7 (Set) ISBN 10: 0-415-56198-1 (Volume 5) ISBN 10: 0-203-09277-5 (ebook) ISBN 13: 978-0-415-56195-2 (Set) ISBN 13: 978-0-415-56198-3 (Volume 5) ISBN 13: 978-0-203-09277-4 (ebook) Publisher’s Note The publisher has gone to great lengths to ensure the quality of this reprint but points out that some imperfec- tions in the original copies may be apparent. The publisher has made every effort to trace copyright holders and welcomes correspondence from those they have been unable to contact.
    [Show full text]
  • SOC 532: SOCIOLOGY of RELIGION Fall 2009 Richard L. Wood, Associate Professor of Sociology Thursdays 4:00-6:30 Pm, 1061 SSCI (Sociology Commons)
    SOC 532: SOCIOLOGY OF RELIGION Fall 2009 Richard L. Wood, Associate Professor of Sociology Thursdays 4:00-6:30 pm, 1061 SSCI (Sociology Commons) Office Hours: Mondays 2:00-3:00 p.m.1078 SSCI, 505-277-3945 Thursdays 2:00-3:00 p.m.1078 SSCI, 505-277-3945 or mornings at 401 Hokona-Zuni, by appointment via 277-1117 [email protected] fax: 505-277-1115 This course is designed to introduce students to a broad range of sociological work on religion. The course will emphasize the social and political implications of religious dynamics, but we will also pay attention to broader elements of religion. The field is a vast one, and even a serious, graduate-level course can only skim the surface; students are encouraged to delve more deeply into their particular interests via the term paper project. The course includes a variety of theoretical approaches, and comparative-historical, survey, network-analytic, and ethnographic methodological approaches are all included. We will discuss the relative advantages that different theoretical and methodological approaches offer for generating sociological insight into religion and society. The content of the course will be weighted heavily toward understanding religion and society in three settings: the United States, Latin America, and the Middle East. However, the theoretical and methodological tools learned will be useful for the sociology of religion in whatever settings draw your interests (and term papers can certainly be written on a wide variety of topic areas). Goals of the course: At the end of semester (if you prepare the readings well, engage actively in thoughtful discussion, and complete the other assignments), you will have laid strong intellectual foundations for doing graduate-level scholarship on religion (comprehensive exams, master’s thesis, dissertation research, etc.).
    [Show full text]
  • ROBERT WUTHNOW Department of Sociology Wallace Hall Princeton
    ROBERT WUTHNOW Department of Sociology Wallace Hall Princeton University Princeton, New Jersey 08544 (609) 258-4742 or 258-4531 Education: University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, B.S., 1968, Summa Cum Laude University of California, Berkeley, Department of Sociology, Ph.D., 1975 Employment: Andlinger Professor of Sociology Director, Center for the Study of Religion Princeton University Publications: Books The Left Behind: Decline and Rage in Rural America (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2018), 196 pp. American Misfits and the Making of Middle Class Respectability (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2017), 362 pp. Inventing American Religion: Polls, Surveys, and the Tenuous Quest for a Nation’s Faith (New York: Oxford University Press, 2015), 256 pp. In the Blood: Understanding America’s Farm Families (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2015), 240 pp. Rough Country: How Texas Became America’s Most Powerful Bible-belt State (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2014), 654 pp. Paperback edition, 2016. Small-Town America: Finding Community, Shaping the Future (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2013), 504 pp. Paperback edition, 2015. The God Problem: Expressing Faith and Being Reasonable (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2012), 332 pp. Red State Religion: Faith and Politics in America’s Heartland (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2012), 484 pp. Paperback edition, 2014. Remaking the Heartland: Middle America Since the 1950s (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2011), 376 pp. Paperback edition, 2013. Be Very Afraid: The Cultural Response to Terror, Pandemics, Environmental Devastation, Nuclear 2 Annihilation, and Other Threats (New York: Oxford University Press, 2010), 304 pp.
    [Show full text]
  • American Sociological Association 1722 N Street, NW Washington, DC
    Lester F. Ward Ellsworth Faris Everett C. Hughes William G. Sumner Frank H. Hankins George C. Homans Franklin H. Giddings Edwin H. Sutherland Pitirim A. Sorokin Albion W. Small Robert M. Maciver Wilbert E. Moore Edward A. Ross Stuart A. Queen Charles P. Loomis George E. Vincent Dwight Sanderson Philip M. Hauser George E. Howard George A. Lundberg Arnold M. Rose Charles H. Cooley Rupert B. Vance Ralph H. Turner Frank W. Blackmar Kimball Young Reinhard Bendix James Q. Dealey Carl C. Taylor William H. Sewell Edward C. Hayes Louis Wirth William J. Goode James P. Lichtenberger E. Franklin Frazier Mirra Komarovsky Ulysses G. Weatherly Talcott Parsons Peter M. Blau Charles A. Ellwood Leonard S. Cottrell, Jr. Lewis M. Coser Robert E. Park Robert C. Angell Alfred McClung Lee John L Gillin Dorothy Swaine Thomas J. Milton Yinger William I. Thomas Samuel A. Stouffer Amos H. Hawley John M. Gillette Florian Znaniecki Hubert M. Blalock, Jr. William F. Ogburn Donald Young Peter H. Rossi Howard W. Odum Herbert Blumer William Foote Whyte Emory S. Borgardus Robert K. Merton Erving Goffman Luther L. Bernard Robin M. Williams, Jr. Alice S. Rossi Edward B. Reuter Kingsley Davis James F. Short, Jr. Ernest W. Burgess Howard Becker Kai Erikson F. Stuart Chapin Robert E. L. Faris Matilda White Riley Henry P. Fairchild Paul F. Lazarsfeld American Sociological Association 1722 N Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20036 (202) 833-341 0 (Printed in the USA.) COVER DESIGN by Karen Gray Edwards Th~ time has long passed, if it ever existed, when it is sensible to generalize from findings based on studies done entirely within the · UnitEid States, without asking whether our findings are descriptive only of the U.S: or would apply as well to other developed countries, to other Western countries, to other capitalist countries, to other countries in gene~al.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham Research Online
    Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 06 March 2009 Version of attached le: Published Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: Guest, M. (2007) 'Evangelical identity and contemporary culture : a congregational study in innovation.', Milton Keynes: Paternoster. Further information on publisher's website: http://www.paternoster-publishing.com/authentic/welcome.jsp Publisher's copyright statement: Additional information: Sample chapters deposited. Chapter 1: 'Evangelical Christianity in a post-Christian world.', pp.1-22. Chapter 8: 'The bigger picture.', pp.194-219. Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Durham University Library, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LY, United Kingdom Tel : +44 (0)191 334 3042 | Fax : +44 (0)191 334 2971 https://dro.dur.ac.uk CHAPTER 1 Evangelical Christianity in a Post-Christian World Peter Berger has noted that, of the world’s religions, it is Protestant Christianity that has had the most ‘intense and enduring encounter with the modern world’. 1 Indeed, previous examinations of this relationship have focused on a number of affinities.
    [Show full text]
  • June 2021 CURRICULUM VITAE ROBERT WUTHNOW Gerard R. Andlinger
    June 2021 CURRICULUM VITAE ROBERT WUTHNOW Gerard R. Andlinger ’52 Professor of Sociology Emeritus Department of Sociology 107 Wallace Hall Princeton University Princeton, New Jersey 08544 [email protected] 609-258-4531 Education Ph.D. University of California, Berkeley, 1975 - Sociology B.S. University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, 1968 Selected Honors and Awards Andrew M. Greeley Lifetime Achievement Award in Sociology of Religion, 2018 Distinguished Career Award, ASA Section on Altruism, Morality, and Social Solidarity, 2016 Coral Horton Tullis Memorial Prize, Texas State Historical Association, for Rough Country: How Texas Became America’s Most Powerful Bible-Belt State, 2015 Member, American Philosophical Society, elected 2013 Association of American Publishers Award for Professional and Scholarly Excellence, Theology and Religious Studies, for Boundless Faith: The Global Outreach of American Churches, 2010 Warren J. Mitofsky Award for Excellence in Public Opinion Research, Roper Center, 2009 Member, American Academy of Arts and Sciences, elected 2008 Honorary Degree, Doctor of Humane Letters, Wake Forest University, 2008 Tufts Civic Engagement Research Prize, Tisch College of Citizenship and Public Service, 2007 Mirra Komarovsky Best Book Award, Eastern Sociological Society, for America and the Challenges of Religious Diversity, 2007 Distinguished Article Award, Sociology of Religion Section, American Sociological Association, 2004, with Conrad Hackett and Becky Yang Hsu 2 Martin E. Marty Award for Public Understanding of Religion,
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae [July 2012]
    Curriculum Vitae [July 2012] Michael Hout Natalie Cohen Professor of Sociology & Demography University of California, Berkeley Address Phones Department of Sociology Office: (510)643-6874 410 Barrows Hall Dept: (510)642-4766 Berkeley, California 94720-1980 e-mail: mikehout @ berkeley.edu Education 1976 Ph.D. Indiana University [Sociology] Dissertation: Determinants of Marital Fertility in the United States, 1960–1970 1973 M.A. Indiana University [Sociology] 1972 B.A. University of Pittsburgh [Sociology and History] Employment History 2009– University of California, Berkeley, Natalie Cohen Professor of Sociology & Demography 2006- University of California, Berkeley, Professor of Sociology & Demography 1988-2006 University of California, Berkeley, Professor of Sociology 1985-88 University of California, Berkeley, Associate Professor of Sociology 1982-85 University of Arizona, Associate Professor of Sociology 1976-82 University of Arizona, Assistant Professor of Sociology Honors 2007 Otis Dudley Duncan Award, for Century of Difference, Population Section of the American Sociological Association 2006 Elected to the American Philosophical Society 2003 Elected to the National Academy of Sciences 2000 Distinguished Graduate School Alumnus, Indiana University 1998 “Outstanding book” on Human Rights, Gustavus Myers Center, for Inequality by Design 1997 Elected to American Academy of Arts and Sciences 1996 Population Association of America Clifford C. Clogg Memorial Award “In recognition of distinguished contributions to the collection, modeling, and analysis of census and survey data.” 1989 Elected to Sociological Research Association Books 2006 Fischer, Claude S., and Michael Hout. Century of Difference: How America Changed in the Last Hundred Years. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Greeley, Andrew, and Michael Hout. The Truth About Conservative Christians.
    [Show full text]
  • January, 2020 CURRICULUM VITAE ROBERTO M
    January, 2020 CURRICULUM VITAE ROBERTO M. FERNANDEZ OFFICE ADDRESS: Massachusetts Institute of Technology PHONE: (617) 253-7256 MIT Sloan School of Management FAX: (617) 253-2660 Room E62-387 E-Mail: [email protected] 100 Main Street Cambridge, MA 02142-1347 EDUCATION Ph.D. Sociology, University of Chicago, 1985 M.A. Sociology, University of Chicago, 1980 B.A. Sociology, Harvard College, 1978 HONORS AND AWARDS SION Distinguished Faculty Residence, Department of Sociology and Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University (May, 2018). Keynote speaker, “Past, Present, and Future Research on Networks and Hiring,” at the Hiring and Organizations conference at the Stanford Graduate School of Business (May, 2018). Keynote speaker, “What do Labor Market Networks Do?“ at the "Social Networks, Referrals and Neighborhood Effects in Frictional Labour Markets" conference at the Center of Interdisciplinary Research, Bielefeld University (April, 2018). Keynote speaker, “Reflections on the Glass Ceiling,” at the International Conference on The Role of the Firm in the Labor Market, Berlin, Germany (April, 2017). Keynote speaker for the 10th Anniversary Celebration of the Ph.D program at ESSEC, Cergy, France (December 8, 2016). Keynote speaker, “Does Competition Drive Out Discrimination?,” at the 5th Madrid Work and Organizations Symposium, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Madrid, Spain (October 30, 2015). Keynote speaker, “What Does Competition Do?,” at the Second Lugano Conference on Organizations, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland (June 20, 2015). Keynote speaker, “The Power of Networks in the Labor Market,” at “Embeddedness and Beyond: Do Sociological Theories Meet Economic Realities?” International Conference in Moscow http://esconf2012.hse.ru/video/ (October 25-28, 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • CULTURE and COGNITION Professor Vanina Leschziner Department of Sociology University of Toronto Fall 2019
    SOC6517HS: GRADUATE SEMINAR SOCIOLOGY OF CULTURE II: CULTURE AND COGNITION Professor Vanina Leschziner Department of Sociology University of Toronto Fall 2019 Location and Time: Sociology Department, Room 240, Thursday 12pm-2pm Office Hours: Thursday 3-5pm, Room 398, 725 Spadina (third floor) Phone Number: 416-978-4535 Email: [email protected] Course Description and Objectives Culture and Cognition is a newer but rapidly growing area in sociology. It is not simply the sum of its two parts -- some culture and some cognition. Rather, the area is defined by relatively specific conceptual interests, analytical frameworks and methodological approaches to the study of culture and cognition as phenomena that are observable in their association at a social level, and that are thus subject to systematic study. As an area of study, Culture and Cognition is associated with the sociology of culture. But it has a specific set of analytical concerns that make it clearly distinct from the larger subfield. Scholars in Culture and Cognition are interested in studying the relationship between mental schemas, cultural configurations, and social structures. Unlike the broader sociology of culture, the area of Culture and Cognition focuses on the workings of the mind, seeking to understand how mental structures shape actors’ perceptions, thinking, decision-making, actions, and social relations. Scholars in this area utilize a variety of methods -- both qualitative and quantitative -- to empirically investigate the actions, discourses, and patterns of relations through which they can examine how culture and cognition interrelate to shape social arrangements. This seminar will provide an overview of the kind of research being done in Culture and Cognition.
    [Show full text]
  • Contemp Theory 2003
    CONTEMPORARY THEORY a/k/a Sociology 502 Instructor: Paul DiMaggio (8-1971, [email protected]) Term: Spring, 2003 (9:00 am – 12 noon, Wednesdays) Room 190, Wallace Hall Purpose: This 12-week seminar surveys the field of contemporary social theory, exposing you to major approaches, themes, thinkers and debates. There are several ways one could organize such a course: as a historical narrative of issues and debates; as an introduction to a set of important books or important thinkers, around varying approaches to theory and theory construction (from metatheory to cumulative theoretical research programs), or around key theoretical dilemmas (theories of action, mechanisms bridging micro and macro, comparative history). This seminar does a little bit of each, providing a tasting menu that will, I hope, provide at least superficial literacy and equip you to probe more deeply the ideas and approaches that you find most stimulating and useful. The focus throughout is on the instrumental value of theory, as a means of improving research. There are many ways that theory can do that – by making one question taken-for-granted assumptions and thus liberating one from conventional habits of mind, by ex- ercising the imaginative faculties, by clarifying presuppositions that form the implicit ground for research, by presenting models for thinking about problems, and even by suggesting empirical propositions. Eligibility: This seminar is required of first-year graduate students in Sociology. It is open to any graduate student in Sociology or other social-science department or the Woodrow Wilson school, and to senior-year sociology majors. Others may apply to instructor for admission.
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Theory
    CONTEMPORARY THEORY a/k/a Sociology 502 Instructor: Paul DiMaggio (8-1971, [email protected]) Term: Spring, 2002 (9:00 am – 12 noon, Thursdays) Room 190, Wallace Hall Purpose: This 12-week seminar surveys the field of contemporary social theory, exposing you to major approaches, themes, thinkers and debates. There are several ways one could organize such a course: as a historical narrative of issues and debates; as an introduction to a set of important books or important thinkers, around varying approaches to theory and theory construction (from metatheory to cumulative theoretical research programs), or around key theoretical dilemmas (theories of action, mechanisms bridging micro and macro, comparative history). This seminar does a little bit of each, providing a tasting menu that will, I hope, provide at least superficial literacy and equip you to probe more deeply the ideas and approaches that you find most stimulating and useful. The focus throughout is on the instrumental value of theory, as a means of improving research. There are many ways that theory can do that – by making one question taken-for-granted assumptions and thus liberating one from conventional habits of mind, by ex- ercising the imaginative faculties, by clarifying presuppositions that form the implicit ground for research, by presenting models for thinking about problems, and even by suggesting empirical propositions. Eligibility: This seminar is required of first-year graduate students in Sociology. It is open to any graduate student in Sociology or other social-science department or the Woodrow Wilson school, and to senior-year sociology majors. Others may apply to instructor for admission.
    [Show full text]